Scribd
Upload
13 views2 pages

Rubrics

The document outlines the evaluation criteria and marks allocation for a Basic Electrical Engineering Lab experiment. It includes sections on practical implementation, performance during execution, goal acquisition, data listing, discussion of results, and affective aspects like discussion and clarification of results. Each criterion is graded on a scale from Level 0 to Level 4, with specific descriptions for each level.

Uploaded by

Saad Khan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
13 views2 pages

Rubrics

The document outlines the evaluation criteria and marks allocation for a Basic Electrical Engineering Lab experiment. It includes sections on practical implementation, performance during execution, goal acquisition, data listing, discussion of results, and affective aspects like discussion and clarification of results. Each criterion is graded on a scale from Level 0 to Level 4, with specific descriptions for each level.

Uploaded by

Saad Khan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

EECE1091 Basic Electrical Engineering Lab

(R1 - Experiment)
PSYCHOMOTOR (P2)
Allocated Marks
S. No. Criteria Marks Level 0 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Obtained
Implementation of practical procedural steps by the student, as guided during
Practical demonstration, is:
1 implementation 1 0 lacking consistency across inconsistent, with notable
generally consistent, with
consistent and accurate
(exp. steps, material occasional minor
many attempts variations with multiple attempts
variations
preparation, etc.)
0.25 0.5 0.75 1
Performance Student performance during execution of the experiment as instructed by
during execution the lab instructor is:
2 (equipment operation, 1 0 lacking precision with inconsistent with moderate generally precise with highly precise and
control over exp., significant errors errors minor errors consistent without errors
readings, safety
0.25 0.5 0.75 1
precautions etc.)
For the achievement of goals, as guided/outlined in lab manual, the student:
fails to achieve task partially achieves the completes tasks with completes tasks precisely
Acquisition of Goals objectives & has objectives, with noticeable minor &
4 (Group contribution, exp. 0.5 0 significant errors deviations from objectives accurately and meets all
results as required, etc.) errors stated
objectives

0.125 0.25 0.375 0.5


SUB-TOTAL MARKS (PT)
2.5 SUB-TOTAL MARKS OBTAINED (PO)

(a) COGNITIVE (C2)


Allocated Marks
S. No. Criteria Marks Level 0 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
Obtained
Data listing (tabulation, graphs, charts, as needed) and calculations performed by the student
is:
Data listing (calculation,
5 tabulation, graphs, charts, 0.75 0 complete and inaccurate complete and accurate with fully complete and
incomplete and inaccurate
with major parts missing minor parts missing accurate
etc.)

0.1875 0.375 0.563 0.75


Discussion on results and relating them with real-life applications by the student is:

unclear, incoherent, or lack somewhat clear but lack mostly clear and logical, logically and persuasive,
logical flow consistency and focus with minor lapses in with
Discussion on coherence clear and coherent
6 Results 0.5 0 reasoning
(With real-life applications)

0.125 0.25 0.375 0.5


SUB-TOTAL MARKS (CT)
1.25 SUB-TOTAL MARKS OBTAINED (CO)
(b) AFFECTIVE (A2)
Allocated Marks
S. No. Criteria Level 0 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Obtained
Marks
Student discussion on results (i.e. conclusive remarks) is:
in right direction, accepts near to correct, accepts correct, and actively seeks
vague, and avoids or
Discussion disregards feedback,
feedback but shows limited feedback and incorporates and interprets feedback,
7 (ability to discuss the 0.5 0 arguments in varying some aspects in results for
showing little to no situations interpretation meaningful arguments on
results) incorporation
results

0.125 0.25 0.375 0.5


Student clarification about results under varying situations is:
accurate, convincing and
mostly accurate generally accurate and well reasoned,
Clarification weak, inaccurate and non- but arguments convincing with minor effectively
8 (ability to clarify results 0.75 0 convincing lack errors addressing the
under varying situations) strength/reason in reasoning modifications
in results

0.1875 0.375 0.563 0.75

SUB-TOTAL MARKS (AT)


1.25
SUB-TOTAL MARKS OBTAINED (AO)
Instructor’s Name: Total Marks (PT + CT + AT) :

Instructor’s Signature: Marks Obtained (PO + CO + AO) :

You might also like