BAHIR DAR UNIVERSITY

INSTITUTE OF DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT

AND FOOD SECURITY STUDY

DEPARTMENT OF DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT

AND FOOD SYSTEM RESILIENT MSC PROGRAM

COURSE TITLE: LIVELIHOOD, NUTRITION AND FOOD

SECURITY (Drfs 5211)

Individual assignment on reviewing: POLITICAL ECONOMY OF LIVELIHOODS

IN INDIA

By: ID

Mussie Birhanie BDU1700330

Submitted to: Mossa Endris (PhD)

Bahir Dar, Ethiopia

i|Page
 Contents
1. Lessons I learned from the paper reviewed.......................................................................................1
2. Summary...........................................................................................................................................1
3. Introduction.......................................................................................................................................2
4. Objective...........................................................................................................................................2
5. Main arguments by the author...........................................................................................................3
6. Critics................................................................................................................................................4
7. Policy recommendation.....................................................................................................................5
8. Conclusion and recommendation......................................................................................................5

ii | P a g e
1. Lessons I learned from the paper reviewed

Lessons I learned from the paper reviewed

1, India's economy encompasses the control of resources like land, water, and forests, which are

unevenly distributed, affecting various groups of livelihoods.

2, Political economy examines the relationships between economics, law, and politics.

3, Analyzing political economy can enhance the effectiveness of livelihood policies and

interventions.

4, the unequal distribution of resources like land creates a power imbalance, with those

controlling resources dictating terms to the marginalized. This insight stresses the importance of

advocating for equitable resource distribution to empower the poor.

2. Summary

The document explores the political economy of livelihoods in India, emphasizing its

significance for organizations engaged in poverty alleviation. It defines political economy as the

dynamics of resource control and its implications for different communities. The focus is

primarily on land, but it also encompasses water, forests, and capital, highlighting how uneven

distribution affects various groups, such as farmers, tribals, and laborers. While agrarian relations

have received attention, the livelihoods of marginalized groups remain underrepresented in

political discourse. By analyzing these relationships and resource bases, the document aims to

enhance understanding and inform more effective livelihood in the political economy of

livelihoods in India is crucial yet often overlooked by organizations promoting livelihoods. It

encompasses the control and dynamics of resources like land, water, and forests, which are

unevenly distributed, affecting various groups, including farmers, tribes, and laborers.

1|Page
Understanding these dynamics is essential for effective livelihood interventions that address the

needs of the poor.

3. Introduction

The political economy of livelihoods in India is a crucial area that remains underexplored.

Understanding the dynamics of resource control such as land, water, forests, and capital is

essential for organizations aiming to improve the livelihoods of the poor. This resource book

delves into the intricate relationships between economics, law, and politics, emphasizing how

uneven resource distribution affects various groups, including farmers, tribals, and laborers. By

examining these relationships, we can better address the needs of those whose livelihoods are at

risk.

4. Objective

The objectives of the article on the political economy of livelihoods in India are multifaceted.

Firstly, it aims to analyze the intricate relationships between resource control and poverty,

highlighting how unequal access to essential resources like land, water, and capital contributes to

systemic inequalities.

Secondly, the article seeks to illuminate the specific challenges faced by marginalized

communities such as farmers, tribal populations, and informal workers who are often overlooked

in mainstream policy discussions.

Thirdly, it intends to advocate for inclusive policy-making processes that actively involve these

communities in shaping interventions that affect their livelihoods. Lastly, the article aspires to

promote a comprehensive understanding of the political economy to inform better strategies for

poverty alleviation and resource distribution, ultimately aiming for equitable and sustainable

2|Page
development that benefits all segments of society. By achieving these objectives, the article

endeavors to contribute to more effective and just policy frameworks in India.

5. Main arguments by the author

The author presents four main arguments regarding the political economy of livelihoods in India.

Resource Control and Power the author argues that understanding the control and distribution of

resources such as land, water, and forests is essential for addressing poverty and inequality.

Unequal access creates significant power imbalances affecting marginalized groups.

Marginalized Communities Overlooked: The author highlights that while agrarian issues are

often discussed, the specific livelihoods and challenges faced by marginalized communities,

including tribes and informal workers, are frequently ignored in policy discussions, leading to

ineffective interventions.

Need for Inclusive Policies: The author emphasizes the importance of inclusive policy-making

that actively incorporates the voices and needs of diverse groups. This approach is crucial for

developing targeted strategies that address the unique challenges different communities face.

Integrated Political Economy Approach: The author advocates for a comprehensive analysis of

the political economy that considers the interplay of various factors affecting livelihoods. This

integrated perspective is necessary for formulating effective strategies to improve living

conditions and ensure equitable access to resources for all.

The document advocates for several policy recommendations to improve livelihoods in India

through a political economy lens. First, it suggests enhancing the understanding of resource

distribution dynamics among policymakers and practitioners to design targeted interventions for

marginalized communities. Second, it calls for inclusive policies that recognize the diverse needs

3|Page
of various groups, such as tribals, pastoralists, and urban laborers, ensuring their voices are heard

in decision-making processes.

It emphasizes the importance of integrating land reform initiatives with environmental

sustainability efforts to secure the livelihoods of those dependent on land and natural resources.

Additionally, policies should address access to credit and financial services, enabling vulnerable

populations to invest in their livelihoods. Finally, the document recommends fostering

partnerships between government, civil society, and private sectors to create holistic approaches

that tackle structural inequalities and promote equitable resource distribution, leading to

sustainable livelihood outcomes

1. How do power imbalances in resource distribution specifically impact the livelihoods of

marginalized communities, and what evidence exists to support these claims?

2. In what ways can integrating political economy perspectives into existing livelihood strategies

lead to more sustainable development outcomes for both agrarian and non-agrarian

communities?

3. What specific policy interventions could be implemented to address the unique challenges

faced by trials and forest dwellers in India, and how can these interventions be measured for

effectiveness?

6. Critics

The document's examination of the political economy of livelihoods in India may face several

criticisms. One potential critique is that it emphasizes resource distribution without adequately

addressing the broader systemic issues, such as historical injustices and socio-cultural factors

that contribute to inequality. Additionally, while it highlights the plight of marginalized groups,

critics may argue that it lacks specific case studies or data to substantiate its claims, making the

4|Page
analysis less compelling. Furthermore, the focus on land and agrarian relations might be seen as

too narrow, neglecting the complexities of urban livelihoods and informal economies. Some may

also contend that the document does not sufficiently explore the role of government policies and

market forces in shaping livelihoods, potentially oversimplifying the political dynamics at play.

Lastly, there could be a call for more actionable recommendations for practitioners to effectively

integrate political economy insights into their livelihood interventions.

7. Policy recommendation

The document advocates for several policy recommendations to improve livelihoods in India

through a political economy lens. First, it suggests enhancing the understanding of resource

distribution dynamics among policymakers and practitioners to design targeted interventions for

marginalized communities. Second, it calls for inclusive policies that recognize the diverse needs

of various groups, such as tribals, pastoralists, and urban laborers, ensuring their voices are heard

in decision-making processes. Third, it emphasizes the importance of integrating land reform

initiatives with environmental sustainability efforts to secure the livelihoods of those dependent

on land and natural resources. Additionally, policies should address access to credit and financial

services, enabling vulnerable populations to invest in their livelihoods. Finally, the document

recommends fostering partnerships between government, civil society, and private sectors to

create holistic approaches that tackle structural inequalities and promote equitable resource

distribution, leading to sustainable livelihood outcomes.

8. Conclusion and recommendation

In conclusion, the analysis of the political economy of livelihoods in India underscores the

urgent need for a holistic understanding of resource distribution and its impact on marginalized

communities.

5|Page
Addressing systemic inequalities requires not only recognizing the diverse needs of various

groups but also implementing inclusive and participatory policy-making processes.

To effectively enhance livelihoods, the author recommends several strategic actions.

First, there should be a concerted effort to engage marginalized voices in the policymaking

process, ensuring their needs and experiences inform interventions. Second, policies must

integrate land reforms with sustainable development goals to protect the interests of vulnerable

populations reliant on natural resources. Third, access to credit and financial services should be

expanded to empower individuals to invest in their livelihoods. Finally, fostering collaboration

between government, civil society, and the private sector can create comprehensive approaches

that tackle structural inequalities and promote equitable resource distribution. By implementing

these recommendations, policymakers can work towards a more just and sustainable future for

all communities in India.

6|Page