Page No

Ex.No Date

AIM:

INTRODUCTION:

CASE tools known as Computer-aided software engineering tools is a kind of

componentbased development which allows its users to rapidly develop information systems. The
main goal of as technology is the automation of the entire information systems development life
cycle process using a set of integrated software tools, such as modeling, methodology and
automatic code generation. Component based manufacturing has several advantages over custom
development. The main advantages are the availability of high quality, defect free products at low
cost and at a faster time. The prefabricated components are customized as per the requirements of
the customers. The components used are pre-built, ready- tested and add value and differentiation
by rapid customization to the targeted customers. However the products we get from case tools are
only a skeleton of the final product required and a lot of programming must be done by hand to
get a fully finished, good product.

CHARACTERISTICS OF CASE:

Some of the characteristics of case tools that make it better than customized development
are;

 It is a graphic oriented tool.

 It supports decomposition of process.

Some typical CASE tools are:

 Unified Modeling Language

 Data modeling tools, and
 Source code generation tools

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

INTRODUCTION TO UML (UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE):

The UML is a language for specifying, constructing, visualizing, and documenting the
software system and its components. The UML is a graphical language with sets of rules and
semantics. The rules and semantics of a model are expressed in English in a form known as OCL
(Object Constraint Language). OCL uses simple logic for specifying the properties of a system.
The UML is not intended to be a visual programming language. However it has a much closer
mapping to object-oriented programming languages, so that the best of both can be obtained. The
UML is much simpler than other methods preceding it. UML is appropriate for modeling systems,
ranging from enterprise information system to distributed web based application and even to real
time embedded system. It is a very expensive language addressing all views needed to develop and
then to display system even though understand to use. Learning to apply UML effectively starts
forming a conceptual mode of languages which requires learning.
Three major language elements:

• UML basic building blocks

• Rules that dictate how this building blocks put together
• Some common mechanism that apply throughout the language

The primary goals in the design of UML are:

1. Provides users ready to use, expressive visual modeling language as well so they can
develop and exchange meaningful models.

2. Provide extensibility and specialization mechanisms to extend the core concepts.

3. Be independent of particular programming languages and development processes.

4. Provide formal basis for understanding the modeling language.

5. Encourage the growth of the OO tools market.

6. Support higher-level development concepts.

7. Integrate best practices and methodologies.

Every complex system is best approached through a small set of nearly independent views of a
model. Every model can be expressed at different levels of fidelity. The best models are connected
to reality.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

The UML defines nine graphical diagrams:

1. Class diagram
2. Use-Case diagram
3. Behavior diagram
3.1. Interaction diagram
3.1.1.1. Sequence diagram

3.1.1.2. Collaboration diagram

3.2. State Chart diagram

3.3. Activity diagram

4. Implementation diagram
4.1. Component diagram
4.2. Deployment diagram

1. UML class diagram:

The UML class diagram is also known as object modeling. It is a static analysis diagram.
These diagrams show the static structure of the model. A class diagram is a connection of static
model elements, such as classes and their relationships, connected as a graph to each other and
to their contents.

2. Use-case diagram:
The functionality of a system can be described in a number of different use-cases, each of
which represents a specific flow of events in a system. It is a graph of actors, a set of use- cases
enclosed in a boundary, communication, associations between the actors and the use- cases, and
generalization among the use-cases.

3. Behavior diagram:
It is a dynamic model unlike all the others mentioned before. The objects of an object
oriented system are not static and are not easily understood by static diagrams. The behavior of
the class’s instance (an object) is represented in this diagram. Every use-case of the system has
an associated behavior diagram that indicates the behavior of the object. In conjunction with the
use-case diagram we may provide a script or interaction diagram to show a time line of events.
It consists of sequence and collaboration diagrams.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

4. Interaction diagram:
It is the combination of sequence and collaboration diagram. It is used to depict the flow of
events in the system over a timeline. The interaction diagram is a dynamic model which shows
how the system behaves during dynamic execution.

5. State chart diagram:

It consists of state, events and activities. State diagrams are a familiar technique to describe
the behavior of a system. They describe all of the possible states that a particular object can get
into and how the object's state changes as a result of events that reach the object. In most OO
techniques, state diagrams are drawn for a single class to show the lifetime behavior of a single
object.

6. Activity diagram:
It shows organization and their dependence among the set of components. These diagrams
are particularly useful in connection with workflow and in describing behavior that has a lot of
parallel processing. An activity is a state of doing something: either a real-world process, or the
execution of a software routine.

7. Implementation diagram:
It shows the implementation phase of the systems development, such as the source code
structure and the run-time implementation structure. These are relatively simple high-level
diagrams compared to the others seen so far. They are of two sub-diagrams, the component
diagram and the deployment diagram.

8. Component diagram:
These are organizational parts of a UML model. These are boxes to which a model can be
decomposed. They show the structure of the code itself. They model the physical components
such as source code, user interface in a design. It is similar to the concept of packages.

9. Deployment diagram:
The deployment diagram shows the structure of the runtime system. It shows the
configuration of runtime processing elements and the software components that live in them.
They are usually used in conjunction with deployment diagrams to show how physical modules
of code are distributed on the system.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

NOTATION ELEMENTS:
These are explanatory parts of UML model. They are boxes which may apply to describe
and remark about any element in the model. They provide the information for understanding the
necessary details of the diagrams.

Relations in the UML:

These are four kinds of relationships used in an UML diagram, they are:
• Dependency
• Association
• Generalization
• Realization Dependency:
It is a semantic relationship between two things in which a change one thing affects the
semantics of other things. Graphically a dependency is represented by a non-continuous line.

Association:
It is a structural relationship that describes asset of links. A link is being connected among
objects. Graphically association is represented as a solid line possibly including label.

Generalization:
It is a specialized relationship in which the specialized elements are substitutable for object
of the generalized element. Graphically it is a solid line with hollow arrow head parent.

Realization:
It is a semantic relation between classifiers. Graphically it is represented as a cross between
generalization and dependency relationship.

Where UML can be used:

UML is not limited to modeling software. In fact, it is expressive to model non-software such
as to show in structure and behavior of health case system and to design the hardware of the system.

Conceptual model be UML:

UML you need to form the conceptual model of UML. This requires three major elements:

1. UML basic building blocks.

2. Rules that dictate how this building blocks are put together.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

3. Some common mechanism that apply throughout the language.

Once you have grasped these ideas, you may be able to read. UML create some basic ones. As
you gain more experience in applying conceptual model using more advanced features of this
language.

Building blocks of the UML:

The vocabulary of UML encompasses these kinds of building blocks.

Use CASE definition:

Description:

A use case is a set of scenarios tied together by a common user goal. A use case is a behavioral
diagram that shows a set of use case actions and their relationships.

Purpose:
The purpose of use case is login and exchange messages between sender and receiver (Email
client).

Main flow:
First, the sender gives his id and enters his login. Now, he enters the message to the receiver
id.

Alternate flow:
If the username and id by the sender or receiver is not valid, the administrator will not allow
entering and “Invalid password” message is displayed.

Pre-condition:
A person has to register himself to obtain a login ID.

Post-condition:
The user is not allowed to enter if the password or user name is not valid.
Class diagram:
Description:

• A class diagram describes the type of objects in system and various kinds of relationships
that exists among them.
• Class diagrams and collaboration diagrams are alternate representations of object models.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

During analysis, we use class diagram to show roles and responsibilities of entities that provide
email client system behaviors design. We use to capture the structure of classes that form the email
client system architecture.
A class diagram is represented as:
<<Class name>>
<<Attribute 1>>
<<Attribute n>>
<<Operation ()>>

Relationship used:
A change in one element affects the other

Generalization:
It is a kind of relationship

State chart:
Description:

• The state chart diagram made the dynamic behavior of individual classes.

• State chart shows the sequences of states that an object goes through events and state
transitions.
• A state chart contains one state ‘start’ and multiple ‘end’ states.
The important objectives are:

Decision:
It represents a specific location state chart diagram where the work flow may branch based
upon guard conditions.

Synchronization:
It gives a simultaneous workflow in a state chart diagram. They visually define forks and
joints representing parallel workflow.

Forks and joins:

• A fork construct is used to model a single flow of control.

• Every work must be followed by a corresponding join.

• Joints have two or more flow that unit into a single flow.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

State:
A state is a condition or situation during a life of an object in which it satisfies condition or
waits for some events.

Transition:
It is a relationship between two activities and between states and activities.

Start state:
A start state shows the beginning of a workflow or beginning of a state machine on a state
chart diagram.

End state:
It is a final or terminal state.

Activity diagram

Description:
Activity diagram provides a way to model the workflow of a development process. We can
also model this code specific information such as class operation using activity diagram. Activity
diagrams can model different types of diagrams. There are various tools involved in the activity
diagram.

Activity:
An activity represents the performance of a task on duty. It may also represent the execution
of a statement in a procedure.

Decision:
A decision represents a condition on situation during the life of an object, which it satisfies
some condition or waits for an event.

Start state:
It represents the condition explicitly the beginning of a workflow on an activity.

Object flow:
An object on an activity diagram represents the relationship between activity and object that
creates or uses it.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

Synchronization:
It enables us to see a simultaneous workflow in an activity.

End state:
An end state represents a final or terminal state on an activity diagram or state chart diagram.

Sequence diagram:
Description:

A sequence diagram is a graphical view of scenario that shows object interaction in a time
based sequence what happens first what happens next. Sequence diagrams are closely related to
collaboration diagram.

The main difference between sequence and collaboration diagram is that sequence diagram show
time based interaction while collaboration diagram shows objects associated with each other.

The sequence diagram for the e-mail client system consists of the following objectives:

Object:
An object has state, behavior and identity. An object is not based is referred to as an instance.

The various objects in e-mail client system are:

• User

• Website

• Login

• Groups
Message icon:
A message icon represents the communication between objects indicating that an action will
follow. The message icon is the horizontal solid arrow connecting lifelines together.

Collaboration diagram:
Description:

Collaboration diagram and sequence diagrams are alternate representations of an interaction.

A collaboration diagram is an interaction diagram that shows the order of messages that implement

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

an operation or a transaction. Collaboration diagram is an interaction diagram that shows the order
of messages that implement an operation or a transaction. Collaboration diagram shows object s,
their links and their messages. They can also contain simple class instances and class utility
instances. During, analysis indicates the semantics of the primary and secondary interactions.
Design, shows the semantics of mechanisms in the logical design of system. Toggling between the
sequence and collaboration diagrams When we work in either a sequence or collaboration diagram,
it is possible to view the corresponding diagram by pressing F5 key.

Allocated Marks
TABLE OF CONTENT
Marks Obtained
AIM 5
DESCRIPTION AND DIAGRAM 10
RESULT 5
VIVA 5
TOTAL 25

RESULT:

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

Ex.No Date

AIM:

PROBLEM IDENTIFIED:

Malicious websites are a major security threat, facilitating various cybercrimes such
as phishing, malware distribution, and identity theft. Many users fall victim to these threats
due to the deceptive nature of such websites. Existing methods, such as blacklists, are
ineffective against zero-hour attacks and newly generated malicious URLs, as attackers use
obfuscation and algorithmic techniques to bypass detection.

PROBLEM STATEMENT:

The detection of malicious websites is a crucial task in cybersecurity to protect users

from phishing attacks and other online threats. The existing detection mechanisms primarily
rely on blacklists, which fail to identify newly created malicious URLs. To address this issue,
the proposed system implements both Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL)
models for enhanced accuracy in malicious URL detection. ML models such as Decision
Trees, Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Adaptive Boost will be used for
feature classification, while a Hybrid Deep Learning Model utilizing an autoencoder
mechanism will optimize detection performance. This approach aims to improve the accuracy
and efficiency of identifying malicious websites while reducing false positives.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

Ex.No Date

AIM:

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Introduction

1.1 Purpose

1.2 Scope

2. Overall Description

2.1 Product Perspective

2.2 User Classes and Characteristics

2.3 Operating environment

3. Functional Requirements

3.1 Input Interface

3.2 Recognition Module

3.3 Output Interface

3.4 User Management

4. Non- Functional Requirements

4.1 Performance

4.2 Usability

4.3 Reliability

4.4 Security

5. System Models

5.1 Use Case Diagram

6. Other Requirements

6.1 Legal and Regulatory Requirements

6.2 Documentation Requirements

7. Glossary

8.Appendices

8.1 References

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

PROJECT TITLE: MALWARE DETECTION SYSTEM

1. Introduction

1.1 Purpose

This document outlines the software requirements specification for the malicious
website detection system. The application is designed to identify and prevent access to harmful
websites by analyzing their characteristics and behaviors. It provides a secure browsing
environment by classifying websites and warning users of potential threats.

1.2 Scope

• Detects and classifies malicious websites using machine learning and deep learning
models.
• Provides automated URL classification as safe, suspicious, or malicious..
• Offers real-time threat detection with instant alerts when users attempt to visit harmful
websites..

• Uses natural language processing (NLP) to analyze website content, metadata, and
phishing indicators.

• Integrates machine learning models such as Random Forest, SVM, Naïve Bayes, and
Neural Networks for improved accuracy..

• Maintains a dynamic threat database that continuously updates with newly detected
malicious URLs and integrates with external threat intelligence sources

• Features an adaptive learning model that enhances detection by analyzing new attack
patterns and refining AI algorithms..

• Supports enterprise integration by providing API access for businesses to incorporate

detection features into their security infrastructure.

• Implements secure user authentication with role-based access control for administrators,
analysts, and regular users..

These features may be considered for future enhancements based on user feedback and market
needs.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

2. Overall Description

2.1 Product Perspective

The malicious website detection system is a web-based cybersecurity tool designed to

identify and classify harmful websites in real time. It analyzes various attributes such as domain
age, SSL certificates, IP reputation, and webpage content to detect potential threats. Unlike
traditional blacklist-based approaches, the system incorporates machine learning and deep
learning models to enhance accuracy and detect zero-day attacks. It can function as a standalone
web application or integrate into enterprise security frameworks through an API. The system
continuously updates its detection models and maintains a threat database to counter evolving
cyber threats.

2.2 User Classes and Characteristics

• The system is designed for general internet users, cybersecurity analysts, and
organizations to enhance web security.

• General users browse the web and may unknowingly visit malicious websites, while
cybersecurity analysts monitor and investigate threats.

• Organizations integrate the system into their security infrastructure to protect

employees from phishing and malware attacks, requiring administrators and analysts
to have cybersecurity knowledge.

These users are expected to have basic computer literacy skills and internet access.

2.3 Operating environment

The system is accessible through web browsers on desktops, laptops, and mobile devices. It
is compatible with Windows, macOS, and Linux operating systems. The system requires an
active internet connection for real-time scanning and integration with external threat
intelligence sources. The backend operates on a secure cloud infrastructure with database
storage for logs and reports.Functional Requirements

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

3. Functional Requirements

3.1 Input Interface

The application will provide a user interface for entering the following information:

• Users can manually enter website URLs for scanning, upload files containing multiple
URLs, or submit requests via an API.
• The system fetches and analyzes web page data, extracting key attributes such as
domain age, SSL certificate status, and IP reputation.
• Validation checks ensure accurate input, preventing the scanning of improperly
formatted URLs or duplicate entries.

The interface should allow users to enter data in a clear and organized manner. Validation rules
should be implemented to ensure data accuracy

3.2 Recognition Module

The recognition module will employ two key functionalities:

• Feature extraction and analysis: The system extracts and analyzes multiple website
attributes to detect malicious behavior. It evaluates factors such as domain age, WHOIS
information, SSL certificate validity, website content, embedded scripts, and IP
reputation. Using natural language processing (NLP), it scans webpage text and
metadata to identify phishing attempts, fake login forms, and suspicious keywords.
Additionally, it examines URL structure and obfuscation techniques that attackers use
to bypass security filters.

• Machine learning-based classification: The system applies machine learning (ML)

and deep learning (DL) models such as Random Forest, SVM, Naïve Bayes, and Neural
Networks to classify websites into safe, suspicious, or malicious categories. These
models analyze patterns in previously flagged websites and continuously improve
detection accuracy by learning from new data. threat intelligence databases to validate
3.3 Output Interface

The application will provide output in the following ways:

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology
 Page No

• Website classification results: After analyzing a URL, the system provides a

classification result indicating whether the website is safe, suspicious, or malicious.
This classification is based on factors like domain age, SSL certificate status, content
analysis, and IP reputation. Users can view these results instantly, along with a
confidence score representing the accuracy of the classification.
• Detailed threat analysis report: The system generates a comprehensive report
containing information about the website’s security risks. This includes phishing
indicators, presence of malware, URL obfuscation techniques, redirection behavior, and
suspicious JavaScript execution. Users can access this report to understand why a
website was flagged and take appropriate actions.
• Real-time alerts and recommendations: When a user attempts to visit a potentially
dangerous website, the system triggers a real-time warning. The alert advises users to
avoid the website and provides alternative safe links or security tips. For organizations,
the system can log and send reports to cybersecurity teams, allowing them to block
malicious websites across their network.

3.4 User Management

The system may include user management functionalities to provide a personalized experience.
This could include:

• The system includes a secure authentication mechanism where users can register, log
in, and access features based on their roles. Role-based access control ensures that
administrators, analysts, and general users have appropriate permissions..
• Users can manage their profiles, update personal details, and track their scanned URLs.
Administrators can oversee user activities, configure security settings, and manage
roles.

• The system maintains a history of all scanned URLs, allowing users to review past
results. Administrators and analysts can monitor system usage, track threats, and
generate reports for further analysis.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

4. Non- Functional Requirements

4.1 Performance

• The system processes URL scans within a few seconds, ensuring minimal delay in
detecting malicious websites. It is optimized to handle multiple concurrent scans
without significant performance degradation.
• Efficient algorithms and database management techniques ensure quick retrieval of
previously scanned URLs, reducing the need for repeated analysis of known websites..
• The system is designed to scale efficiently, allowing it to accommodate an increasing
number of users and scans while maintaining high accuracy and response speed.

4.2 Usability

• The system features a simple and intuitive user interface, making it easy for users to
enter URLs, view scan results, and access reports without technical expertise.
• Clear and visually structured classification results, including safety scores and threat
indicators, help users quickly understand potential risks.
• The platform is accessible across multiple devices and browsers, ensuring a seamless
experience for all users, including those with limited cybersecurity knowledge.

4.3 Reliability

• The system maintains a high detection accuracy rate by continuously updating its
machine learning models and threat database to detect emerging cyber threats.
• It ensures minimal downtime with robust server infrastructure, regular maintenance,
and failover mechanisms to provide uninterrupted service.
• Proper error handling and logging mechanisms help track system performance, detect
anomalies, and ensure smooth functionality even under high user loads.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

4.4 Security

• The application should implement user authentication mechanisms to prevent

unauthorized access to user data. This may involve password protection and secure
login procedures.
• Sensitive user data (resumes, personal information) should be encrypted during storage
and transmission. This protects data confidentiality and prevents unauthorized access.
• The application should follow secure coding practices to minimize vulnerabilities that
could be exploited by malicious actors.

5. System Models

5.1 Use Case Diagram

The SRS document should include a Use Case Diagram that visually represents the interaction
between users and the system functionalities. This diagram typically depicts actors (users) and
use cases (tasks they want to perform). Here's an example:

• Actors: General user, Cybersecurity Analyst, Administrator

• Use Cases:

o General User :
▪ Enter URL for scanning
▪ View website classification results
▪ Receive real-time alerts
▪ Access scan history
o Cybersecurity Analyst :
▪ Monitor flagged websites
▪ Analyze threat reports
▪ Review suspicious activities
o Administrator:
▪ Manage user accounts
▪ Update detection models
▪ Configure security settings
SMVEC - Department of Information Technology
 Page No

6. Other Requirements

6.1 Legal and Regulatory Requirements

The system complies with data privacy laws such as the General Data Protection
Regulation (GDPR) and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) to ensure user data
protection and ethical handling of information. It follows cybersecurity regulations and
standards, including the NIST Cybersecurity Framework and OWASP guidelines, to maintain
secure operations and prevent unauthorized access. Additionally, the system ensures proper
logging and reporting of detected malicious websites while maintaining transparency and
adhering to legal frameworks for cyber threat monitoring and prevention. These measures help
in protecting user information, preventing misuse of data, and ensuring that the detection
system operates within the boundaries of cybersecurity laws and ethical guidelines.

6.2 Documentation Requirements

This section specifies the types of documentation required for the project. Here are
some examples:

• A user manual will be provided to help users navigate the system, enter URLs,
interpret scan results, and understand security alerts.
• Technical documentation will detail system architecture, machine learning models,
API integration, and security configurations for developers and cybersecurity
analysts.
• An administrator guide will include instructions on managing user accounts, updating
detection models, and maintaining the threat database.
• Regular updates to documentation will ensure that changes in system features,
security policies, or compliance requirements are clearly communicated.
7. Glossary

• Phishing: A fraudulent technique where attackers create fake websites to steal sensitive
information from users.
• Machine learning: An artificial intelligence approach that enables the system to
analyze patterns and improve detection accuracy over time.
• Blacklist: A database of known malicious websites that helps in blocking access to
harmful URLs..
SMVEC - Department of Information Technology
 Page No

• Deep learning: An advanced subset of machine learning that uses neural networks to
detect complex patterns in website behavior.
• False positive: A safe website that is incorrectly flagged as malicious by the detection
system.
• False negative: A malicious website that is mistakenly classified as safe, potentially
exposing users to cyber threats..
• SSL certificate: A security protocol that encrypts communication between a website
and users, helping to verify the authenticity of a website.
• Zero-hour attack: A newly launched cyber threat that has not yet been detected or
blacklisted by security systems.
• Threat intelligence: Data collected from cybersecurity sources to enhance the
detection of malicious activities and improve system performance..
• URL obfuscation: A technique used by attackers to disguise malicious links and make
them appear legitimate.

8. Appendices

8.1 References

• Muon Ha, Yulia Shichkina, Nhan Nguyen, and Thanh-Son Phan, “Classification of
malicious websites using machine learning based on URL characteristics,”
ResearchGate, July 12, 2023.

• Mohammed Aljebreen, Fatma S. Alrayes, Sumayh S. Aljameel, and Muhammad

Kashif Saeed, “Political Optimization Algorithm with a Hybrid Deep Learning
Assisted Malicious URL Detection Model,” MDPI, December 13, 2023.

• Saeid Sheikhi, Panos Kostakos, “Safeguarding Cyberspace: Enhancing Malicious

Website Detection with PSO-Optimized XGBoost and Firefly-Based Feature
Selection,” Elsevier, Volume 142, July 2024, 103885.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

Ex.No Date

AIM:

SCENARIOS:

1. New URL/File Scan Scenario:

• User uploads a file or enters a URL to scan.

• User selects preferred scanning modes (e.g., quick scan, deep scan).
• System extracts key features for classification.
• System displays initial results highlighting possible malicious patterns.

2. Existing Scan History Management Scenario:

• User views previously scanned files/URLs and their results.

• User marks flagged files/URLs as safe or confirms malicious nature.
• User updates threat details or modifies classification tags.
• System maintains an updated log of scan results and adjustments.

3. Threat Analysis and Pattern Learning Scenario:

• System analyzes historical scan data to identify recurring malicious patterns.

• System builds behavior models using machine learning techniques.
• Identifies high-risk sources, domains, and files based on trends.
• Generates insights on potential vulnerabilities and emerging threats.

4. Advanced Threat Prevention Recommendation Scenario:

• System suggests proactive defense techniques for high-risk patterns.

• User specifies security goals (e.g., prevent phishing, reduce zero-day attacks).
• System recommends:

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

o Suitable machine learning models (e.g., Decision Tree, Random Forest).

o Deep learning techniques with auto-encoder optimization.
o Security tools and browser plugins for enhanced protection.

5. Automated Threat Mitigation Scenario:

• System dynamically adjusts security protocols based on emerging threats.

• High-risk domains are automatically blocked or quarantined.
• User receives alerts with real-time recommendations.
• System updates blacklist and suspicious pattern databases.

USE CASES:

1. Manage User Profile

• Actor: User
• Description: This use case covers functionalities for managing user accounts and
preferences, including:

• Create a new user account.

• Login to an existing account.
• Edit profile details (e.g., name, contact info).
• Configure scan preferences and notification settings.

2. Initiate and Manage Scans

• Actor: User
• Description: This use case includes functionalities for scanning and analyzing
files/URLs:

• Upload or enter URLs/files for scanning.

• Select scan mode (quick scan or deep scan).
• View scan results and classification summary.
• Mark suspicious files/URLs for further investigation.
• Download detailed scan reports.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

3. Manage Scan History and Results

• Actor: User
• Description: This use case focuses on tracking and updating scan results:

• View and filter past scan reports.

• Add notes or modify scan results.
• Update threat status of flagged files/URLs.
• Identify and label recurring threat patterns.

4. Analyze Malicious Behavior Patterns

• Actor: System
• Description: This use case focuses on leveraging machine learning for threat
analysis:

• Analyze features of previously scanned URLs/files.

• Identify malicious patterns and predict future threats.
• Generate insights on evolving attack vectors.
• Update threat databases dynamically.

5. Recommend Optimal Security Strategies

• Actor: System
• Description: This use case covers suggesting proactive measures for threat
prevention:

• Analyze past scan results and user preferences.

• Recommend feature classification and optimization techniques.
• Suggest suitable algorithms (e.g., Decision Tree, Adaptive Boost).
• Recommend online tools, security plugins, and preventive measures.

6. Generate and Adjust Dynamic Threat Mitigation Plans

• Actor: System
• Description: This use case focuses on creating dynamic response plans:

• Build real-time defense protocols based on scan history.

• Generate smart threat mitigation strategies.
• Adjust blacklists and security configurations dynamically.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

USE CASE MODEL:

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

Allocated Marks
TABLE OF CONTENT
Marks Obtained
AIM 5
DESCRIPTION AND DIAGRAM 10
RESULT 5
VIVA 5
TOTAL 25

RESULT:

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

Ex.No Date

AIM:

OBJECT INTERACTION AND DIAGRAMS FOR MALICIOUS DETECTION

SYSTEM

Identified Objects:

Based on the scenarios and use cases, here are the key objects involved in the Malicious
Detection System:
• User: Represents the individual using the system.
• URL/File: Represents the file or website to be scanned.
• Scan Engine: Analyzes URLs and files to detect malicious behavior.
• Scan Manager: Manages scan requests, stores results, and handles updates.
• Database: Stores scan history, user preferences, and threat patterns.
• Notification System: Triggers alerts and notifications for suspicious results.

Sequence Diagram - Initiate Scan

This sequence diagram depicts the interaction between objects when a user initiates a scan in
the Malicious Detection System:

1. User interacts with the system to upload a file or enter a URL.

2. The system forwards the scan request to the Scan Manager.
3. Scan Manager stores scan request details in the database.
4. The Scan Engine analyzes the file or URL to detect malicious patterns.
5. The Scan Manager updates the scan status and stores results.
6. If threats are detected, the Notification System triggers an alert.
7. The system displays the scan results to the user.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

Sequence Diagram - Update Scan History

This sequence diagram depicts the interaction between objects when a user updates scan
history or modifies scan details:

1. User selects an existing scan result to update or review.

2. The system retrieves scan details from the Scan Manager.
3. User modifies scan-related information (e.g., re-scan, priority updates).
4. The system sends the updated details to the Scan Manager.
5. Scan Manager updates the record in the database.
6. The Scan Engine re-analyzes the scan if needed.
7. Updated results and notifications are adjusted accordingly.
8. The system confirms the successful update to the user.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

State Chart for Scan Lifecycle

This state chart represents the lifecycle of a scan in the Malicious Detection System:
• Initialized: Scan request is submitted by the user.
• In Progress: Scan is actively being processed.
• Completed: Scan results are generated successfully.
• Re-scanned: Scan is reinitiated due to changes or user request.
• Threat Detected: Malicious content is found and flagged.
• Cleaned/Quarantined: Threat is neutralized or removed.
• Archived: Scan history is stored for future reference.
• Deleted: Scan record is permanently removed.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

Activity Diagram - Scan Management

This activity diagram illustrates the process of scan management in the Malicious Detection
System:

1. User opens the Malicious Detection System.

2. User chooses to upload a file or enter a URL for scanning.
3. If initiating a new scan:
o Enter file/URL details.
o Scan Engine analyzes content.
o Results are stored and alerts are triggered if necessary.
4. If reviewing scan history:
o Fetch scan results.
o Modify and save changes if needed.
o Re-scan if required.
5. If deleting a scan record:
o Remove the record from the system.
o Cancel associated notifications or alerts.
6. System confirms the action and returns to the main dashboard.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

Allocated Marks
TABLE OF CONTENT
Marks Obtained
AIM 5

DESCRIPTION AND DIAGRAM 10

RESULT 5

VIVA 5

TOTAL 25

RESULT:

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

Ex.No Date

AIM:

1. Project Scope Definition

The project scope encompasses:
• Developing a machine learning and deep learning-based system for detecting and predicting
malicious websites.
• Implementing feature classification using Decision Tree, Random Forest, K-Nearest, and
Adaptive Boost algorithms.
• Integrating a hybrid deep learning model with auto-encoder (AE) for feature optimization.
• Providing a web-based interface for end-users to input URLs for analysis and view scan results

1.1 Introduction
The "Detection and Prediction of Malicious Websites Using Feature Classification and
Optimization Techniques" project aims to build a robust system capable of identifying malicious
websites by leveraging a combination of machine learning and deep learning models. This
solution addresses the increasing cybersecurity threats by:
• Accurate Malicious Website Detection: Using feature-based classification models to detect
malicious URLs and domains.
• Advanced Feature Optimization: Employing auto-encoder techniques to improve feature
selection and reduce false positives.
• Multi-Algorithm Classification: Using Decision Tree, Random Forest, K-Nearest, and
Adaptive Boost for improved prediction accuracy.
• Comprehensive Web Interface: Allowing users to scan websites and view results with
detailed insights.
• Scalability and Efficiency: Ensuring that the solution can handle a high volume of website
scans with minimal latency.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

1.2 Project Deliverables

The primary deliverables of this project will be a fully functional malicious website detection
system with the following features:
• User Management: Account creation, login, and role-based access for users and
administrators.
• Website/URL Scanning Module: Allowing users to input URLs and receive a risk analysis
report.
• Feature Classification Engine: Integration of Decision Tree, Random Forest, K-Nearest, and
Adaptive Boost models to classify URLs based on malicious indicators.
• Deep Learning Optimization: Implementation of a hybrid deep learning model with auto-
encoder (AE) to enhance classification accuracy.
• Scan History and Result Storage: Enabling users to access previous scan results for
reference.
• Admin Review Panel: A dashboard for administrators to review scan outcomes and monitor
system performance.
• Security and Privacy Measures: Ensuring the protection of user data and secure
communication between system components.
• Real-time Notification System: Alerting users about potential threats or suspicious activity

1.3 Project Inclusions

The project scope encompasses development, testing, and deployment of the malicious website
detection system. The key inclusions are:
• User Interface (UI): Designing a responsive and intuitive web interface for ease of use.
• Database Management: Secure storage of scan data, user profiles, and historical information.
• Algorithm Integration: Incorporation of multiple machine learning models for feature
classification and analysis.
• Deep Learning Enhancement: Developing an auto-encoder-based deep learning model for
feature optimization.
• Security Protocols: Implementing encryption, secure communication, and access control
measures.
• API Integration: Enabling communication with external APIs for URL analysis and threat
intelligence.
• Scan Reporting and Visualization: Providing detailed insights and analytics on scan results.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

1.4 Project Exclusions

The following functionalities are currently excluded from the project scope:
• Advanced Phishing Detection: Identifying phishing attacks through content analysis and
visual recognition will be considered in future iterations.
• Real-Time Threat Intelligence Integration: While basic threat intelligence will be integrated,
continuous real-time updates will be considered in subsequent versions.
• Mobile Application Development: The initial version will be a web-based solution, with
mobile app support considered as a future enhancement

1.5 Assumptions and Dependencies

The project operates under the following assumptions:
• Users have basic knowledge of web security and URL scanning procedures.
• Access to publicly available datasets for training machine learning models.
• Availability of APIs for real-time threat intelligence and data enrichment.
• Reliable hosting infrastructure to support scalable system deployment.
• Development and deployment tools are suitable for the project requirements

1.6 Success Criteria

The project will be considered successful upon achieving the following criteria:
• A fully functional malicious website detection system is developed and deployed.
• The classification models achieve a high accuracy rate in detecting malicious URLs.
• The auto-encoder-based optimization model enhances system efficiency and reduces false
positives.
• The web interface provides a seamless user experience for URL scanning and result
visualization.
• Security protocols effectively protect user data and prevent unauthorized access.

1.7 Communication and Change Management

A structured communication plan will be established to ensure regular updates, timely reviews,
and transparency with project stakeholders. Change management procedures will be
implemented to evaluate and incorporate any required modifications during the development
lifecycle.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No
1. Cost Estimation Techniques for Malicious Website Detection Project
Several cost estimation techniques can be employed for the "Detection and Prediction of Malicious
Websites using Feature Classification and Optimization Techniques of Machine Learning and
Deep Learning Models" project:

2.1. Top-Down Estimation

• Estimate total project cost based on industry averages for similar cybersecurity and AI-
based applications.
• Provides a high-level overview but may lack precision.

Concept:
This technique estimates the total project cost based on historical data from similar AI-powered
cybersecurity applications or industry benchmarks.

Advantages:

• Quick and easy to implement, especially for projects with comparable models and feature
sets.
• Provides a high-level overview of potential costs.

Disadvantages:

• May lack accuracy, especially if the project involves innovative features or custom
models.
• Relies heavily on the availability of reliable historical data from similar projects.

2.2. Bottom-Up Estimation

• Identify individual tasks and their associated costs (e.g., data preprocessing, model
development, feature engineering, UI/UX design, cloud storage, and deployment).
• Offers a more detailed breakdown but requires effort to identify all tasks.

Concept:
This technique involves breaking down the malicious website detection project into smaller, well-
defined tasks. Each task’s time and resource requirements are estimated individually, and the total
project cost is derived by summing these estimates.

Advantages:

• Provides a more detailed and accurate cost breakdown.

• Useful for identifying cost drivers and potential areas for cost optimization.

Disadvantages:

• Can be time-consuming to identify and estimate all individual tasks.

• Relies on precise estimates for each component, which can be challenging.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

2.1. Three-Point Estimate

• Consider optimistic, pessimistic, and most likely cost scenarios for each task.
• Provides a range for potential costs and helps account for uncertainties.

Concept:
This technique considers three possible scenarios for each task:

1. Optimistic: The best-case scenario with minimal costs.

2. Pessimistic: The worst-case scenario where development is delayed or requires additional
resources.
3. Most Likely: The most probable cost/time estimate.

The final estimate is calculated using a weighted average of these three values.

Advantages:

• Accounts for potential risks and uncertainties in model training and implementation.
• Provides a cost range, offering a more realistic budget estimation.

Disadvantages:

• Requires expertise to estimate optimistic, pessimistic, and most likely costs accurately.
• Relies on subjective judgment to determine the weight of each scenario.

2.2. Parametric Estimation

• Utilizes historical data and mathematical models to predict project cost.

Concept:
This technique applies formulas or established cost relationships based on cybersecurity application
characteristics (e.g., data size, model complexity, and cloud storage) to estimate the overall cost.

Advantages:

• Can be more accurate than top-down estimation, especially for projects with comparable
AI-driven cybersecurity features.
• Provides an objective cost estimation model.

Disadvantages:

• Requires access to relevant historical project data and established parametric models.
• May not be suitable for highly unique malicious website detection models with custom
feature sets.

2.3. Function Point Analysis (FPA)

• Specifically used for software development projects.

• Estimates effort based on functional size, measured in Function Points (FP).

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

Concept:
FPA evaluates the complexity of AI features in the malicious website detection system, such as
feature classification, optimization techniques, and hybrid deep learning models. Industry data
provides benchmarks to convert Function Points into effort and cost estimates.

Advantages:

• Offers a standardized approach to estimating AI software development costs.

• Provides objective and repeatable estimates, ensuring cost consistency.

Disadvantages:

• Requires training in FPA methodology and effort estimation using Function Points.
• May not be suitable for AI-powered systems with significant non-functional components
(e.g., real-time threat detection, secure data storage).

2. Cost Estimation Tools

2.1 AI-Powered Task Estimation Tools

• Task Complexity Estimation Tools:

o Tools like ClickUp AI or Motion AI analyze task complexity using historical data
and AI-driven predictions.
o Advantages: Helps predict time and resource allocation based on previous tasks
and workload patterns.
o Disadvantages: Requires integration with task management platforms, may not
work well with sparse historical data.
• Machine Learning-Based Workload Estimation Tools:
o Platforms like Asana AI or Trello Smart Suggestions estimate effort based on task
dependencies, team capacity, and deadlines.
o Advantages: Dynamically adjusts estimations based on real-time progress and
team feedback.
o Disadvantages: Might require extensive initial setup and data training for better
accuracy.

2.2 Expert Judgment Tools

• AI-Powered Collaborative Decision-Making Tools:

o Tools like Notion AI or Fellow AI facilitate expert input on task prioritization and
effort estimation through AI-assisted discussions.
o Advantages: Helps refine malicious detection tasks based on expert
recommendations and team consensus.
o Disadvantages: Requires collaboration with team members, may take time to
reach an optimized consensus.

2.3 Spreadsheet-Based AI Tools

• AI-Integrated Spreadsheets:
o Custom Google Sheets with AI plugins (e.g., GPT-powered formulas) to automate
task time estimations and priority setting.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

o Advantages: Provides flexible and customizable AI-driven task estimation with

minimal cost.
o Disadvantages: Requires knowledge of AI spreadsheet functions, may involve
manual adjustments for best results.
o Consider using pre-built templates with AI integration to streamline setup.

2.4 Online AI Task Estimation Services

• AI-Based Productivity Calculators:

o Websites like Todoist AI or Sunsama provide online estimation tools based on
input like urgency, estimated duration, and workload balance.
o Advantages: Quick and easy to use for getting a rough workload estimation.
o Disadvantages: Limited customization options, may not account for unique task
complexities accurately.

3. Project Scheduling Techniques

3.1 Work Breakdown Structure (WBS):

Concept:
A hierarchical breakdown of the project deliverables into smaller, manageable tasks. It visually
depicts the project scope and task dependencies.

Benefits:

• Improves project clarity and understanding for all stakeholders.

• Helps identify dependencies between tasks and potential bottlenecks.
• Facilitates better resource allocation and task management.

Creation Process:

• Start by defining the main project deliverable (e.g., Malicious Website and File Detection
System).
• Break it down into major functionalities (e.g., Feature Extraction, Model Training,
Malware Classification, API Integration, and User Interface).
• Further decompose each major functionality into smaller, well-defined tasks:
o Feature Extraction: Identify and extract relevant features from websites and files.
o Model Training: Train machine learning models using classification algorithms.
o Malware Classification: Classify websites and files as malicious or benign.
o API Integration: Implement API functionality for real-time scanning.
o User Interface: Design a web-based or terminal interface for user interaction.

3.2 Gantt Chart:

Concept:
A bar chart that visually represents the project schedule. Tasks are displayed along the horizontal
axis, and their durations are shown as bars along a time scale. Dependencies between tasks can be
highlighted.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

Benefits:

• Offers a clear visual overview of the project timeline.

• Helps track progress and identify potential delays.
• Enables communication and collaboration regarding task scheduling.

Creation Process:

• List all tasks identified in the WBS on the chart.

• Estimate the duration of each task in appropriate units (days, weeks).
• Define dependencies between tasks (e.g., Feature extraction must be completed before
model training).
• Use the information to schedule tasks sequentially or concurrently on the chart.

3.3 Critical Path Method (CPM)/Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT):

Concept:
CPM and PERT are scheduling techniques that identify the critical path of a project. The critical
path is the sequence of tasks with zero slack (buffer time) – any delay in these tasks will directly
impact the project deadline.

Benefits:

• Helps prioritize tasks and resource allocation to ensure timely completion.

• Enables proactive risk management by identifying potential bottlenecks on the critical
path.

Implementation:

• Estimate optimistic, pessimistic, and most likely durations for each task.
• CPM uses deterministic calculations, while PERT employs statistical methods to account
for uncertainties.
• Use project management software to automate these calculations and create critical path
diagrams.

3.4 Agile Techniques:

Concept:
Agile methodologies like Scrum emphasize iterative development and continuous improvement.
Project work is divided into short sprints (e.g., 2-week iterations) with frequent planning,
development, and testing cycles.

Benefits:

• Adaptable to changing requirements and allows for course correction as needed.

• Encourages close collaboration and communication within the development team.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

Implementation:

• Define a Product Backlog containing all the features and improvements needed for the
Malicious Website and File Detection system.
• Plan short sprints where specific tasks (e.g., feature refinement, model optimization) are
tackled.
• Hold daily stand-up meetings to track progress and discuss blockers.
• Conduct sprint reviews and retrospectives to improve future development cycles.

4. Malware Detection Tools and Techniques

5.1. Malware Analysis Software:

Features:

• Static and dynamic analysis of websites and files.

• Identification of malicious patterns and behavioral anomalies.
• API integration for real-time threat analysis.
• Automated detection and reporting of malicious entities.

Examples:

• VirusTotal (https://www.virustotal.com/)
• Hybrid Analysis (https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/)
• Cuckoo Sandbox (https://cuckoosandbox.org/)

Advantages:

• Provides comprehensive analysis of suspicious files and URLs.

• Facilitates real-time malware detection.
• Generates detailed threat intelligence reports.

Disadvantages:

• May require high computational resources for dynamic analysis.

• False positives may occur with certain detection methods.

5.2. AI-Powered Threat Detection Tools:

Features:

• AI-driven classification of malicious and benign entities.

• Predictive threat modeling with adaptive learning algorithms.
• Automated scanning and threat analysis.
• Detection of zero-day attacks using anomaly detection.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No
Examples:

• CrowdStrike (https://www.crowdstrike.com/)
• Darktrace (https://www.darktrace.com/)
• Cylance AI (https://www.blackberry.com/us/en/products/cylance)

Advantages:

• Enhances threat detection through continuous learning.

• Identifies previously unknown attack patterns.
• Scales easily for enterprise-level security.

Disadvantages:

• Requires initial model training and periodic retraining.

• High initial setup and licensing costs.

5.3. Threat Intelligence Platforms:

Features:

• Aggregation and analysis of threat data from multiple sources.

• Correlation of malware signatures and IoCs (Indicators of Compromise).
• Real-time threat alerts and mitigation recommendations.

Examples:

• MISP (Malware Information Sharing Platform) (https://www.misp-project.org/)

• ThreatConnect (https://threatconnect.com/)
• Recorded Future (https://www.recordedfuture.com/)

Advantages:

• Facilitates proactive threat intelligence sharing.

• Improves response times to emerging threats.
• Supports real-time threat correlation and investigation.

Disadvantages:

• May generate excessive noise without proper filtering.

• Requires regular updates to maintain relevance.

5.4. AI-Powered Incident Response Tools:

Features:

• Automated incident triage and analysis.

• AI-powered response playbooks for threat mitigation.
• Post-incident forensic analysis and reporting.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No
Examples:
• IBM Resilient (https://www.ibm.com/security/resilient)
• Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR (https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cortex/xsoar)
• Siemplify (https://www.siemplify.co/)

Advantages:

• Speeds up incident response and threat mitigation.

• Reduces manual effort through automation.
• Provides detailed forensic insights for improving security posture.

Disadvantages:

• May require advanced expertise for configuration.

• High implementation and maintenance costs.

5. Applying AI Tools and Techniques

The selection of AI-powered tools will depend on the complexity of the detection system and the
size of the dataset. A possible approach includes:

1. Develop an AI-Assisted Threat Classification Model: Use AI to classify websites and

files as malicious or benign.
2. Use AI for Anomaly Detection: Leverage AI to detect zero-day threats and unexpected
anomalies.
3. Select a Threat Intelligence Platform: Choose a tool that aggregates threat intelligence
and facilitates real-time analysis.
4. Integrate AI with Incident Response Tools: Automate incident analysis and response
using AI-driven playbooks.
5. Monitor System Performance with AI Analytics: Use AI insights to assess the accuracy
and efficiency of threat detection models.

6. Conclusion

By leveraging AI-powered threat detection tools, organizations can:

• Automate and optimize malware classification.

• Enhance threat detection through continuous learning.
• Improve incident response times with AI-powered playbooks.
• Gain insights into emerging threats and zero-day vulnerabilities.
• Increase overall system resilience and security effectiveness.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

Allocated Marks
TABLE OF CONTENT
Marks Obtained
AIM 5
DESCRIPTION AND DIAGRAM 10
RESULT 5
VIVA 5
TOTAL 25

RESULT:

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

Ex.No Date

AIM:

Detection and Prediction of Malicious Websites using Feature Classification

and Optimization Techniques of Machine Learning and Deep Learning
Models

1. Presentation Layer (Client)

The Presentation Layer handles user interactions, ensuring a seamless experience across multiple
platforms. It serves as the interface between users and the backend functionalities of the
application.

User Interaction

Web Application:

• Users can access the malware detection application through a web browser.
• The platform is designed to ensure compatibility with various devices and browsers.

File and URL Scanning:

• Users can upload files or enter URLs to scan for potential malicious content.
• The application provides a clean interface for quick submission and results display.

Real-Time Results:

• The system offers real-time feedback, displaying analysis results within seconds.
• Users receive categorized reports (safe, suspicious, or malicious) based on the analysis.

Report Generation:

• Users can download detailed reports about the scanned files or websites.
• The report includes threat classification, detected anomalies, and prediction scores.

Task History and Scan Logs:

• Users can access historical scan results and review previous reports.
• Scan history is securely stored for future reference.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

Visual Representation

Threat Visualization:

• Displays interactive graphs and heatmaps to visualize malicious patterns.

• Highlights potential threats, anomalies, and affected areas in uploaded files or scanned
URLs.

Scan Progress Indicators:

• Progress bars and visual indicators provide real-time updates during the scanning process.
• Users can track scanning stages (feature extraction, classification, and threat
identification).

2. Data Layer (Server)

The Data Layer handles core functionalities, including authentication, AI-based malware
detection, and external API integrations.

User Authentication and Data Storage

Authentication:

• Username and Password: Users create accounts and log in with standard credentials.
• Multi-Factor Authentication: Optional two-factor authentication for enhanced security.

Data Storage:

• Relational Databases (SQL): Stores user profiles, scan logs, and historical scan results.
• NoSQL Databases: Stores unstructured data such as AI model results and metadata.

AI-Based Malware Detection Engine

Feature Extraction and Classification:

• Extracts features from the input (URLs or files) and classifies them using machine
learning models.
• Utilizes Decision Tree, Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors, and Adaptive Boost for
classification.

Hybrid Deep Learning Model:

• An auto-encoder (AE) is used for optimization and anomaly detection.

• Deep learning models refine feature extraction and enhance threat detection capabilities.

Real-Time Threat Analysis:

• AI models analyze URL patterns, file structures, and metadata to detect malicious
behavior.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No
Third-Party API Integration

VirusTotal API:

• Cross-verifies scan results by integrating with VirusTotal for additional insights.

IP Geolocation API:

• Analyzes geolocation data to determine whether URLs originate from suspicious regions.

Domain Reputation API:

• Validates the reputation of the scanned domain to assess the likelihood of malicious intent.

3. Design Modeling

The application follows a structured design model to ensure maintainability, scalability, and
reliability.

Model-View-Controller (MVC) Architecture

Model (Business Logic Layer):

• Manages core business logic for feature extraction, classification, and malware prediction.
• Handles user profiles, scan history, and AI model results.

View (User Interface Layer):

• Represents the front-end UI of the application.

• Displays scan results, reports, and threat visualizations.

Controller (Application Logic Layer):

• Acts as an intermediary between the Model and View.

• Processes scan requests, AI insights, and task updates, ensuring synchronization between
client and server.

Benefits of Using MVC:

• Modular Development: Allows independent development of the model, view, and

controller.
• Testability: Each component can be tested separately, enhancing system reliability.
• Reusability: The Model and Controller can be reused across similar applications.

4. Entity-Relationship Diagram (ERD)

The ERD defines the data model, including entities and their relationships. In this malware
detection application, the ERD includes:

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No
Entities:

• User: Stores information such as name, contact details, and login credentials.
• Scan: Represents a specific scan with details like URL/file, scan timestamp, and results.
• Model Result: Contains AI model predictions, confidence scores, and feature vectors.
• Threat Category: Defines the type of threat detected (phishing, malware, etc.).

Relationships:

• User has many Scans: A user can submit multiple scans for analysis.
• Scan belongs to a Model Result: Each scan is associated with AI model results.
• Scan belongs to a Threat Category: Each scan is assigned a threat category.
• User reviews Scan Reports: Users can review and download historical scan reports.

5. Design Document

The design document includes comprehensive technical details of the application. It includes:

System Architecture Diagrams:

• High-Level Overview: Illustrates the overall architecture, including the client (browser),
server, database, and AI models for classification and prediction.
• Detailed Client-Server Interaction: Showcases interactions such as how a scan is
submitted, how AI models generate predictions, and how results are displayed.

Layer Descriptions:

• Presentation Layer (Client): Describes UI functionalities, including scan initiation, task

history, and report viewing.
• Business Logic Layer (Server): Handles feature extraction, threat classification, and AI
model execution.
• Data Access Layer: Manages interaction with databases for scan results, user
authentication, and task history.

Class Diagrams:

• Task Class: Manages scan tasks and associated results.

• User Class: Handles user authentication and session management.
• Model Class: Executes AI models and stores predictions.

Entity-Relationship Diagram (ERD):

• Defines data relationships between users, scans, models, and threat categories.
• Helps ensure consistency and maintain data integrity.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

API Documentation:

If the application integrates with external APIs for threat verification or geolocation, the API
documentation will include:

• API Endpoints: Specifies the URLs used to interact with external APIs.
• Request/Response Formats: Describes JSON or XML data formats used for request and
response.
• Authentication: Details any necessary authentication methods for API access.
• Error Codes: Lists potential error codes returned by the APIs and their explanations.

AI POWERED TO DO LIST ARCHITECTURE:

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

Allocated Marks
TABLE OF CONTENT
Marks Obtained
AIM 5

DESCRIPTION AND DIAGRAM 10

RESULT 5

VIVA 5

TOTAL 25

RESULT:

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

Ex.No Date

AIM:

DESIGN PATTERNS:

Software paradigm is a theoretical framework that serves as a guide for the development and
structure of a software system. There are several software paradigms, including:

• Imperative paradigm: This is the most common paradigm and is based on the idea that a
program is a set of instructions that tell a computer what to do. It is often used in
languages such as C and C++.
• Object-oriented paradigm: This paradigm is based on the idea of objects, which are self-
contained units that contain both data and behavior. It is often used in languages such as
Java, C#, and Python.
• Functional paradigm: This paradigm is based on the idea that a program is a set of
mathematical functions that transform inputs into outputs. It is often used in languages
such as Haskell, Lisp, and ML.
• Logic paradigm: This paradigm is based on the idea that a program is a set of logical
statements that can be used to infer new information. It is often used in languages such as
Prolog and Mercury.

SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LIFE CYCLE (SDLC):

SDLC is the acronym for software development life cycle. It is also called the software
development process. All the tasks required for developing and maintaining software. It consists
of a plan describing how to develop, maintain, replace and alter the specific software. It is a
process for planning, creating, testing, and information system. It is a framework that describes
the activity performed at each stage of software development. It is a process used by a system
analyst to develop an information system including requirements, validation, training, and
ownership.

• It allows the highest level of management control.

• Everyone understands the cost and resources required.
• To improve the application quality and monitor the application.
• It performs at every stage of the software development life cycle.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

• Better Communication: The software development life cycle provides a structured

framework for communication between stakeholders, including developers, project
managers, and end-users. This helps to ensure that everyone is on the same page and that
requirements are clearly defined.
• Improved Time Management: The software development life cycle helps to improve time
management by breaking down the development process into manageable stages. This
allows developers to focus on one stage at a time and ensures that deadlines are met.
• Enhanced Collaboration: The software development life cycle encourages collaboration
between developers, testers, and other stakeholders. This helps to ensure that everyone is
working towards the same goal and that issues are identified and addressed early in the
process.
• Better Risk Management: The software development life cycle helps to identify potential
risks and issues early in the process, allowing them to be addressed before they become
major problems. This helps to reduce the risk of project failure and ensures that the final
product meets quality standards.
• Improved Testing: The software development life cycle includes multiple stages of
testing, ensuring that the final product is thoroughly tested and meets quality standards.
This helps to reduce the risk of bugs and errors, ensuring that the final product is stable
and reliable.
• Increased Customer Satisfaction: The software development life cycle ensures that the
final product meets customer requirements and expectations, leading to increased
customer satisfaction. This can help to improve customer loyalty and increase revenue for
the organization.

DIFFERENT TYPES OF SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LIFE CYCLE MODELS:

There are various software development life cycle models. These models are referred to as the
software development process models. The models defined and designed which followed during
the software development process.

1. Waterfall model: The waterfall model is easy to understand and simple to manage. The
whole process of software development is divided into various phases. The step of
requirements analysis, integration, maintenance.
2. Iterative model: It is repetition incarnate. In short, it is breaking down the software
development of large applications into smaller pieces.
3. Spiral model: It helps the group to adopt elements of one or more process models. To
develop strategies that solve uncertainty and risk.
4. V-model: It is known as the verification and validation model. It is characterized by a
corresponding testing phase for the development stage. V model joins by coding phase.
5. Big Bang model: It focuses on all types of resources in software development and coding.
Small project with smaller size development team which are working together.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

STAGES OF SDLC MODEL:

• Stage-1:
Requirement gathering: The feasibility report is positive towards the project and next
phase start with gathering requirement from the user. Engineer communicates with the
client and end users to know their Idea and which features they want the software to
include.
• Stage-2:
Software design: It is a process to transform user requirements into a suitable form. It
helps programmers in software coding. There is a need for more specific and detailed
requirements in software. The output of the process can directly be used in
implementation in a programming language.
There are three design levels as follows:
1. Architectural design – It is the highest abstract version of the system. In a software
system, many components interact with each other.
2. High-level design – It focuses on how the system along with all its components
can be implemented in form of modules.
3. Detailed design – It defines the logical structure of each module and its interface to
communicate with each module.
• Stage-3:
Developing product: In this phase of SDLC, you will see how the product will be
developed. It is one of the crucial parts of SDLC, It is also called the Implementation
phase.
• Stage-4:
Product Testing and Integration: In this phase, we will integrate the modules and will test
the overall product by using different testing techniques.
• Stage-5:
Deployment and maintenance: In this phase, the actual deployment of the product, or you
can say the final product will be deployed, and also we will do maintenance of the product
for any future updates and release of new features.

ADVANTAGES OF USING A SOFTWARE PARADIGM:

• Provide a consistent structure for developing software systems.

• Help developers understand the problem they are trying to solve.
• Help developers design and implement solutions more effectively.
• Help developers organize and reuse code more efficiently.
• Help developers create more reliable and maintainable software.

DISADVANTAGES OF USING A SOFTWARE PARADIGM:

• Can be difficult to learn and understand for new developers.

• Can be limiting if a problem does not fit well into a specific paradigm.
• Can make it difficult to integrate systems developed using different paradigms.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No
ADVANTAGES OF SDLC:

• Provides a structured approach to software development, which helps to ensure that

important steps are not overlooked.
• Helps to identify and manage risks early in the development process.
• Helps to deliver software on time and within budget.
• Helps to ensure that software meets the needs of the customer or end-user.
• Helps to improve communication and collaboration among team members.
• Better Resource Management: The SDLC helps to ensure that resources, such as
personnel, equipment, and materials, are allocated effectively throughout the development
process. This helps to ensure that the project stays on schedule and within budget.
• Quality Assurance: The SDLC includes multiple stages of quality assurance, including
testing, validation, and verification. This helps to ensure that the final product is free of
bugs and errors and meets quality standards.
• Flexibility: The SDLC can be adapted to suit the needs of different types of projects and
organizations. This flexibility allows organizations to choose the SDLC methodology that
works best for them.
• Improved Documentation: The SDLC requires documentation at every stage of the
development process. This helps to ensure that important information is captured and can
be referred to later if needed.
• Continuous Improvement: The SDLC encourages continuous improvement by providing
opportunities for feedback and evaluation throughout the development process. This helps
to ensure that the final product meets the changing needs of the customer or end-user.
• Compliance: The SDLC can help organizations to comply with regulatory requirements
and industry standards by ensuring that software is developed in a controlled and
structured manner.

DISADVANTAGES OF SDLC:

• Can be inflexible, making it difficult to accommodate changes or unexpected events.

• Can be time-consuming and costly, particularly in the early stages of development.
• Can lead to delays or increased costs if requirements change during development.
• Can lead to a focus on documentation rather than working software.
• Can lead to a lack of customer involvement during development, which can result in a
product that does not meet the customer’s needs.
• Limited scope for creativity: The SDLC is a structured approach to software development
that can be quite rigid in its processes and procedures. This can limit the ability of
developers to be creative and come up with innovative solutions.
• Overemphasis on planning: The SDLC places a great deal of emphasis on planning and
documentation, which can sometimes result in too much time and resources being spent
on these activities at the expense of actually developing the software.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

• Difficulty in handling complex or large projects: The SDLC can be difficult to manage for
complex or large projects, as it involves a lot of coordination and communication among
team members and stakeholders.
• Risk of waterfall model: The SDLC follows a sequential process, often referred to as the
waterfall model. This means that each stage of the development process must be
completed before moving on to the next stage. This can result in delays and increased
costs if problems are encountered later in the development process.
• Can be too rigid for agile projects: The SDLC is not well suited for agile development
methodologies, which require a more flexible and iterative approach to software
development.
• May not be suitable for all types of software: The SDLC may not be suitable for all types
of software, particularly those that require a rapid development cycle or frequent updates.

WATERFALL MODEL FOR AI-POWERED TO DO LIST

ITERATIVE WATERFALL MODEL FOR AI-POWERED TO DO LIST :

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

SPIRAL MODEL FOR AI-POWERED TO DO LIST :

V - MODEL FOR AI-POWERED TO DO LIST:

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

Allocated Marks
TABLE OF CONTENT
Marks Obtained

AIM 5

DESCRIPTION AND DIAGRAM 10

RESULT 5

VIVA 5

TOTAL 25

RESULT:

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

Ex.No Date

AIM:

DATA MODELLING FOR MALICIOUS WEBSITE DETECTION:

Data modeling in malicious website detection involves creating structured representations of data
to identify and predict malicious activities. This process applies formal techniques to map data
from different sources and ensure a consistent and accurate approach to detecting potential
threats. It plays a crucial role in understanding relationships between various features and
optimizing the classification of websites as benign or malicious.

Overview:

Data modeling in malicious website detection involves defining and analyzing data requirements
to support the threat analysis and detection processes. It involves collaboration between
cybersecurity experts, data scientists, and machine learning engineers to create a robust model.
Three types of data models are generated during the process of transitioning from requirements to
the implementation of the malicious detection system:

• Conceptual Data Model: This initial model defines technology-independent

specifications for features and threat indicators. It facilitates discussions with stakeholders
on potential malicious patterns and threat vectors.
• Logical Data Model: This translates the conceptual data model into structures that can be
implemented in machine learning models and databases. It identifies specific features such
as URL length, domain age, and HTTPS status.
• Physical Data Model: The logical model is further transformed into a physical model that
organizes data in databases, accounts for storage, and ensures optimal performance for
real-time detection.

Data modeling ensures that data elements, structures, and relationships are consistently defined to
facilitate efficient and accurate detection. Properly modeled data enhances the overall
effectiveness of malicious website detection systems by enabling seamless integration with
classification models and maintaining high accuracy.

Objectives of Data Modeling in Malicious Detection:

• To assist cybersecurity experts, data scientists, and developers in understanding and

using a standardized data model that captures threat indicators.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

• To manage threat data as a resource for real-time monitoring and proactive threat
identification.
• To integrate threat intelligence systems and improve collaborative security protocols.
• To design and maintain databases/data warehouses that house information on known
and potential threats.

Types of Data Modelling:

Data modeling in malicious website detection evolves as threats change, requiring constant
adaptation. Models should be dynamic and capable of adapting to new attack vectors and changes
in malicious behavior.

• Strategic Data Modeling: Defines an overall vision for integrating malicious detection
systems within an organization’s security infrastructure.
• Data Modeling during Systems Analysis: Creates logical data models that are part of the
development of machine learning models and security systems.

DATA MODELS:

Data models for malicious detection provide a framework for managing threat-related data in an
organized, consistent manner. Consistent models ensure the compatibility of data and enable
seamless integration of different threat detection systems. Poorly designed models can lead to
errors in classification and increased maintenance costs.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

Common Problems in Malicious Detection Data Models:

• Rigid business rules: Models that hard-code business rules may lead to difficulties in
adapting to emerging threats. Business rules should be implemented flexibly to handle
evolving attack patterns.
• Incorrect entity identification: Misidentification of key indicators may lead to data
duplication and errors in threat classification. Entity definitions should be explicit and
aligned with threat models.
• Arbitrary differences in models: Inconsistencies between models can result in complex
interfaces between systems, increasing costs. Interfaces should be considered while
designing data models.
• Lack of standardized data: The absence of standard definitions and structures prevents
seamless data sharing across threat intelligence platforms. Consistency in modeling
standards is crucial for collaboration and information exchange.

Types of Data Schemas in Malicious Detection:

• Conceptual Schema: Defines the domain of malicious website detection, including

entities like URLs, domain age, SSL certificates, and phishing patterns.
• Logical Schema: Structures the information into identifiable features for machine
learning models, such as IP reputation, DNS records, and WHOIS data.
• Physical Schema: Defines the actual storage of data in databases, ensuring efficient
access and processing for real-time threat detection.

ER MODEL FOR MALICIOUS DETECTION:

Entity-relationship (ER) models for malicious detection represent structured data to identify
relationships between threat indicators and classification results. An ER model helps in
visualizing relationships between features such as:

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

• Entity Types: URLs, IP addresses, DNS records, certificates, and user interactions.
• Relationships: Associations between entities that capture threat indicators and
classification results.

Techniques for Designing Data Models in Malicious Detection:

Several techniques can be used to create effective data models for malicious website detection,
including:

• Bachman Diagrams
• Chen’s Notation
• IDEF1X
• Relational Models
• Object-Relational Mapping (ORM)
• Data Vault Modeling
• Extended Backus–Naur Form (EBNF)
• Fully Communication-Oriented Information Modeling (FCO-IM)

ER MODEL FOR AI-POWERED TO DO LIST :

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

Allocated Marks
TABLE OF CONTENT
Marks Obtained
AIM 5
DESCRIPTION AND DIAGRAM 10
RESULT 5
VIVA 5
TOTAL 25

RESULT:

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

Ex.No Date

AIM:

DESIGN PATTERNS

A design pattern provides a general reusable solution for common problems that occur in
software design. The pattern typically shows relationships and interactions between classes or
objects.
• The idea is to speed up the development process by providing well-tested, proven
development/design paradigms.
• Design patterns are programming language-independent strategies for solving common
problems.
• That means a design pattern represents an idea, not a particular implementation. By using
design patterns, you can make your code more flexible, reusable, and maintainable.
• It’s not mandatory to always implement design patterns in your project. Design patterns are not
meant for project development. Design patterns are meant for common problem-solving.
Whenever there is a need, you have to implement a suitable pattern to avoid such problems in the
future.
• To find out which pattern to use, you just have to try to understand the design patterns and their
purposes. Only by doing that, you will be able to pick the right one.

TYPES OF DESIGN PATTERNS

Several types of design patterns are commonly used in software development. These patterns can
be categorized into three main groups:

Creational Design Patterns

Creational design patterns abstract the instantiation process. They help make a system
independent of how its objects are created, composed, and represented. A class creational pattern
uses inheritance to vary the class that’s instantiated, whereas an object creational pattern will
delegate instantiation to another object. Creational patterns give a lot of flexibility in what gets
created, who creates it, how it gets created, and when.

There are two recurring themes in these patterns:

• They all encapsulate knowledge about which concrete class the system uses.
• They hide how instances of these classes are created and put together.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

TYPES OF CREATIONAL DESIGN PATTERNS

• Factory Method Design Pattern: Used to create different classifiers dynamically (e.g., URL
classifier, IP address classifier, content classifier).
• Abstract Factory Method Design Pattern: Creates related objects like feature extractors,
prediction engines, and logging mechanisms without specifying their concrete classes.
• Singleton Method Design Pattern: Ensures that the feature extraction engine is a single
instance across the entire system.
• Prototype Method Design Pattern: Enables cloning of existing classifier configurations to
modify them without affecting the original.
• Builder Method Design Pattern: Helps construct complex analysis pipelines step by step
(e.g., feature extraction, classification, and result logging).

Structural Design Patterns

Structural Design Patterns are concerned with how classes and objects are composed to form
larger structures. Structural class patterns use inheritance to compose interfaces or
implementations. The result is a class that combines the properties of its parent classes.

There are two recurring themes in these patterns:

• This pattern is particularly useful for making independently developed class libraries work
together.
• Structural Design Patterns describe ways to compose objects to realize new functionality.
• The added flexibility of object composition comes from the ability to change the composition
at runtime, which is impossible with static class composition.

TYPES OF STRUCTURAL DESIGN PATTERNS

• Adapter Method Design Pattern: Allows different ML and DL models to be plugged into the
system easily.
• Bridge Method Design Pattern: Separates feature extraction from classification, allowing
independent modifications.
• Composite Method Design Pattern: Groups multiple feature sets together into one entity
(e.g., domain features, content features, and network features).
• Decorator Method Design Pattern: Adds extra functionality to classifiers dynamically, such
as logging or alert mechanisms.
• Facade Method Design Pattern: Provides a simplified interface for performing complex
malicious website detection tasks.
• Flyweight Method Design Pattern: Reduces memory usage by reusing feature extraction
models and templates.
• Proxy Method Design Pattern: Controls access to advanced classification algorithms for
different user roles.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

Behavioral Design Patterns

Behavioral Patterns are concerned with algorithms and the assignment of responsibilities
between objects. Behavioral patterns describe not just patterns of objects or classes but also the
patterns of communication between them. These patterns characterize complex control flow
that’s difficult to follow at runtime.

There are three recurring themes in these patterns:

• Behavioral class patterns use inheritance to distribute behavior between classes.
• Behavioral object patterns use object composition rather than inheritance.
• Behavioral object patterns are concerned with encapsulating behavior in an object and
delegating requests to it.

TYPES OF BEHAVIORAL DESIGN PATTERNS

• Chain Of Responsibility Method Design Pattern: Passes the request through multiple
validation and classification stages.
• Command Method Design Pattern: Allows the system to apply, undo, or redo feature
classification steps efficiently.
• Interpreter Method Design Pattern: Parses rule-based inputs for dynamic classifier
configuration.
• Mediator Method Design Pattern: Coordinates communication between classification
modules and reporting systems.
• Memento Method Design Pattern: Stores snapshots of classification results for future audit
purposes.
• Observer Method Design Pattern: Notifies administrators about suspicious patterns and
anomalies in real time.
• State Method Design Pattern: Modifies classification behavior based on incoming website
traffic patterns.
• Strategy Method Design Pattern: Provides different machine learning or deep learning
models for classification.
• Template Method Design Pattern: Defines a common workflow for classification pipelines
while allowing custom feature integration.
• Visitor Method Design Pattern: Analyzes different types of incoming URLs and provides
tailored classification reports.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

DESIGN PATTERN FOR AI POWERED TO DO LIST :

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

Allocated Marks
TABLE OF CONTENT
Marks Obtained
AIM 5
DESCRIPTION AND DIAGRAM 10
RESULT 5
VIVA 5
TOTAL 25

RESULT:

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

Ex.No Date

AIM:

TEST PLANNING

Test planning is one of the critical steps in ensuring the success of malicious website detection
software. The goal of test planning is to address key aspects of testing strategy, resource
utilization, responsibilities, risks, and priorities. Test planning is an integral part of overall project
planning.

The test planning activity marks the transition from one phase of software development to
another. It estimates the number of test cases and their duration, defines the test completion
criteria, identifies areas of risks, and allocates resources. Identification of the best methodologies,
techniques, and tools is part of test planning, which depends on:
• The nature and complexity of malicious website detection
• The test budget and risk assessment
• The skill level of available staff
• The time available for different testing phases

The output of the test planning process is the Test Plan Document. Test plans are developed for
each level of testing. Each test plan corresponds to the phase of software developed in that stage.

• During the requirements phase, the deliverable is the Software Requirements Specification
(SRS), which leads to developing system and validation test plans.
• The design phase produces the System Design Document, which guides the creation of
component and integration test plans.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

TEST PLAN GENERATORS:

TEST CASE

Test case design involves selecting appropriate techniques, preparing test data, developing test
procedures, setting up the test environment, and integrating necessary supporting tools.

In the context of malicious website detection, designing effective test cases ensures that the
system performs as expected under different conditions, including various website inputs, URLs,
and file types. The main test objectives include:
• Validating URL classification and prediction accuracy
• Checking feature extraction from URLs and web pages
• Evaluating the performance of machine learning and deep learning models
• Verifying the handling of false positives and false negatives
• Testing response time and system robustness

To create test objectives:

1. Gather reference materials such as the Software Requirements Specification (SRS) and
design documentation for the malicious detection system.
2. Collaborate with domain experts (e.g., security analysts, test engineers, and data scientists)
in brainstorming sessions to compile a list of test objectives.

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

Example:

For system testing, possible test objectives may include:

• Verifying URL input validation
• Ensuring feature extraction accuracy
• Confirming correct classification by machine learning models
• Validating integration with external security APIs
• Assessing system response to malicious and non-malicious websites

TEST OBJECTIVE TRANSFORMATION

After defining test objectives:

• Transform the objectives into a list of items to be tested under each objective. For example,
while testing feature extraction, the list may include:

• Extracting URL length, domain age, and IP address

• Detecting phishing patterns and abnormal behavior
• Handling missing or malformed data

• Create a mapping matrix between the list of items and any existing test cases to facilitate
reusability. This mapping helps in identifying gaps and avoiding redundant test cases.

Each item in the list should be evaluated for adequacy of coverage, ensuring that no critical
aspect of the malicious detection system is left untested.

TEST COVERAGE

During test planning, decisions related to test coverage need to be made. Test coverage provides
insights into how much of the system's requirements, design, and code are effectively tested.

For malicious website detection, different forms of test coverage include:

• Requirements Coverage: Verifying that all functional and non-functional requirements are
tested

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

• Design Coverage: Ensuring that all modules, APIs, and interfaces are tested
• Code Coverage: Evaluating if all lines of code, branches, and conditions are executed
• Interface Coverage: Validating integration with external APIs and databases

SOFTWARE METRICS AND TEST COVERAGE

Software metrics play an important role in measuring attributes that are critical to the success of
the malicious website detection system. Measurement of these attributes helps clarify
relationships between them, thereby facilitating informed decision-making.

In the context of malicious website detection, relevant software testing metrics include:
• Defect Density: The number of defects per module or component
• Test Effectiveness: The percentage of defects detected by test cases
• Code Coverage Percentage: The extent of code executed during testing
• False Positive/False Negative Rates: Accuracy of classification results

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

SOFTWARE METRICS :

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology

 Page No

Allocated Marks
TABLE OF CONTENT
Marks Obtained
AIM 5
DESCRIPTION AND DIAGRAM 10
RESULT 5
VIVA 5
TOTAL 25

RESULT:

SMVEC - Department of Information Technology