The APG System of Classification is a modern phylogenetic system for flowering plants based on DNA analysis, with major updates in APG I (1998), APG II (2003), APG III (2009), and APG IV (2016). The APG II system, published in 2003, improved upon its predecessor by introducing optional family placements and recognizing major clades like monocots and eudicots, emphasizing evolutionary relationships over traditional morphological traits. This system is significant for its accuracy in classifying plants, aiding botanical research, and providing a foundation for future classifications.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
57 views5 pages
APG II
The APG System of Classification is a modern phylogenetic system for flowering plants based on DNA analysis, with major updates in APG I (1998), APG II (2003), APG III (2009), and APG IV (2016). The APG II system, published in 2003, improved upon its predecessor by introducing optional family placements and recognizing major clades like monocots and eudicots, emphasizing evolutionary relationships over traditional morphological traits. This system is significant for its accuracy in classifying plants, aiding botanical research, and providing a foundation for future classifications.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5
The APG System of Classification
APG (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group) SYSTEM OF CLASSIFICATION is a modern,
phylogenetic classification system for flowering plants (angiosperms). It is based on genetic (DNA sequence) analysis rather than traditional morphological characteristics. The system has undergone multiple revisions, with APG I (1998), APG II (2003), APG III (2009), and APG IV (2016) being the major updates. Features of APG Classification System: 1. Phylogenetic Approach: Based on evolutionary relationships determined through DNA sequencing. 2. Cladistic Analysis: Uses molecular data to create monophyletic groups (clades). 3. No Formal Ranks: Avoids traditional ranks like class, subclass, or order, focusing instead on orders and families. 4. Frequent Updates: APG classification evolves with new genetic evidence.
Major APG Systems:
APG I (1998): First molecular-based classification, introduced new orders and families. APG II (2003): Allowed flexibility in family groupings, introduced optional broader families. APG III (2009): Established a more stable classification with a consensus on major clades. APG IV (2016): Incorporated new families and orders, refining earlier classifications.
APG II System of Classification (2003)
The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group II (APG II) System is an updated classification of flowering plants (angiosperms) published in 2003 by the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG). It is a revision of the APG I system (1998)
M.Sc. Pre Botany Paper IV
and is based on molecular phylogenetics, primarily using DNA sequence data from chloroplast, mitochondrial, and nuclear genes. This system provides a more natural classification of plants based on their evolutionary relationships rather than traditional morphological characteristics.
Key Features of the APG II System
1. Phylogenetic Approach o Based on DNA sequence data to determine relationships between plants. o Focuses on monophyletic groups (clades) to ensure a natural classification. o Emphasizes evolutionary relationships rather than traditional characteristics. 2. Improvement Over APG I (1998) o Introduces optional placements for some families, allowing them to be classified under multiple orders. o Recognizes monocots and eudicots as major groups within angiosperms. o Provides alternative classifications for some families that were previously uncertain. 3. Use of Molecular Data o DNA sequencing of chloroplast, mitochondrial, and nuclear genes was extensively used. o Helped clarify relationships between plant families and orders. o Allowed for reclassification of taxa that were previously misclassified. 4. Division of Angiosperms into Major Clades o Angiosperms are divided into monophyletic clades rather than traditional divisions like Dicots and Monocots. o Recognizes basal angiosperms, monocots, and eudicots as major groups.
M.Sc. Pre Botany Paper IV
o Within eudicots, core eudicots, rosids, and asterids are further classified.
Major Groups in the APG II System
1. Basal Angiosperms Includes the earliest-diverging lineages of flowering plants. Examples: Amborellaceae, Nymphaeaceae (Water lilies), Austrobaileyales. These plants exhibit primitive floral structures and are considered evolutionarily significant. 2. Monocots Characterized by a single seed leaf (cotyledon), parallel leaf venation, and scattered vascular bundles. Orders: Alismatales, Asparagales, Liliales, Arecales, Poales, Zingiberales, Commelinales. Examples: Grasses (Poaceae), Orchids (Orchidaceae), Palms (Arecaceae), Lilies (Liliaceae), Bananas (Musaceae). 3. Eudicots (True Dicots) Characterized by two seed leaves (cotyledons), net-like venation, and vascular bundles arranged in a ring. Divided into Core Eudicots, Rosids, and Asterids. a) Core Eudicots More advanced eudicots with highly specialized floral structures. Orders: Caryophyllales, Santalales. Examples: Cacti (Cactaceae), Carnations (Caryophyllaceae), Sandalwood (Santalaceae). b) Rosids (Divided into Fabids & Malvids) Fabids (Rosid I): Orders include Fabales, Rosales, Cucurbitales, Fagales. Malvids (Rosid II): Orders include Brassicales, Malvales, Sapindales.
Feature APG I (1998) APG II (2003) Classification Basis Molecular Data Improved Molecular Data Monophyletic Groups Some uncertainty More clearly defined Optional Placements Not included Included for certain families Number of Orders 40 45 Number of Families 462 457
Significance of APG II System
1. More Accurate and Natural Classification o Based on evolutionary history rather than arbitrary morphological traits. o Groups plants according to common ancestors, making the classification more stable. 2. Useful in Botanical Research o Helps in studying plant evolution and biodiversity. o Used in plant breeding, agriculture, and conservation. 3. Foundation for Further Classification Systems o Led to refinements in APG III (2009) and APG IV (2016). o Helped resolve uncertainties in plant relationships. 4. Application in Agriculture and Medicine
M.Sc. Pre Botany Paper IV
o Helps in identifying economically important plants. o Used in the pharmaceutical industry for plant-based drug discovery.
Comparison with Traditional Systems
Aspect Traditional Classification APG II System (2003) (Cronquist, Takhtajan, Engler) Basis Morphology, Anatomy Molecular Phylogenetics Groups Dicotyledons & Clades (Basal Monocotyledons Angiosperms, Monocots, Eudicots) Stability Subjective, based on More stable, based on physical traits genetic data Recognition of Less accurate More precise and Evolutionary scientifically robust Relationships