0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views6 pages

Paper 3 MS Feb2025

The document consists of mark schemes for various physics calculations and experiments, detailing the correct answers and reasoning for each part. It includes calculations for voltage, pressure, and graphing techniques, along with criteria for awarding marks based on the accuracy and reasoning of the students' responses. The document emphasizes the importance of correct methodology and reasoning in achieving the desired results.

Uploaded by

ItsDuke
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views6 pages

Paper 3 MS Feb2025

The document consists of mark schemes for various physics calculations and experiments, detailing the correct answers and reasoning for each part. It includes calculations for voltage, pressure, and graphing techniques, along with criteria for awarding marks based on the accuracy and reasoning of the students' responses. The document emphasizes the importance of correct methodology and reasoning in achieving the desired results.

Uploaded by

ItsDuke
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Mark schemes

(a) (i) T = 40(ms) (1)


1.
Hz (1)

(allow C.E. for value of T)

(ii) peak voltage (= 3 × 15) = 45 (V) (1)

rms voltage =32 V (1)

(31.8 V)
4

(b) (i) Irms = = 59mA (1)

(58.9mA)
(use of 32 V gives 59(.2) mA)
(allow C.E. for value of Vrms from (a))

(ii) Vrms = 59 × 10–3 × 90 = 5.3(1) V (1)

(allow C.E. for value of Irms from (i)) [or V2 =V1 ]

(c) Vpeak = 5.31× =7.5(1) (V) (1)


best choice: 5 V per division (1)
(allow C.E. for incorrect Vrms and for suitable reason)

reason: others would give too large or too small a trace (1)
3
[9]

(a) attempts two calculations that would lead to a conclusion 1✔


2.
for 1✔ the result of at least one calculation of M × y must be correct
(see table) otherwise withhold both marks;
allow use of y in m but reject POT error
allow use of correct read-offs from valid BFL;
condone use of two rows of data to show that when M doubles, y
does not halve;
award of 2✔ is contingent on valid 1✔
1

Runnymede College Page 10 of 15


a reasoned judgement explaining why y not inversely proportional to M 2✔

M / kg y / mm acceptable M × y min sf
0.5 89(.0) 44.5 / 45
2
1.0 82(.0) 82(.0)
1.5 76(.0) 114(.0)
2.0 71(.0) 142(.0)
3
2.5 66.5 166(.3)
3.0 62.5 187.5 / 188
for 2✔ two correct calculations of M × y
see table for min sf in result for M × y
OR
one correct calculation of M × y and an appropriate reverse-
working calculation;
statement rejecting inverse-proportion supported by suitable
quantitative reasoning, eg calculation of the percentage difference
between the results of their calculations;
condone ‘large’ / ‘significant differences’ (between calculation
results) / use of >> etc;
reject ‘values are different’ / ‘not same’ / ‘not constant’ / ‘not close
enough’ use of > etc;
reasoning must be based on the data points, eg reject ‘best-fit line
crosses y-axis’
1

Runnymede College Page 11 of 15


(b) (as P moves down) trapped air expands so)
pressure (of trapped air) is reduced 1✔
must address situation in Figure 3
for 1✔ allow ‘pressure reaches lower value’ reject ‘pressure is low’

pressure less than atmospheric pressure 2✔


for 2✔ allow ‘there is a pressure difference across P ‘ / ‘external
pressure > pressure of trapped air’
award 1✔2✔ for pressure of air reduced below atmospheric

this leads to an upwards force balancing the weight of P

OR

pressure difference across P × area of piston = weight of piston 3✔


for 3✔ allow any correct idea about how two opposing forces act to
produce equilibrium;
‘no resultant force’ is not enough
reject ‘weight = gravity’ / ideas about ‘suction’ / equating pressure
with force

why P falls when the valve is opened 4✔


for 4✔ idea of external and internal pressures equalising;
reject ‘pressure released / returns to normal’
Max 3

Runnymede College Page 12 of 15


(c) smooth curve of decreasing negative gradient through all 6 points 1✔
for 1✔ must be a single continuous line for M > 0.5 that overlaps
with all 6 +;
1

line with negative gradient extrapolated (backwards) to M ≤ −0.35 2✔


condone poorly-marked line (note that poor line quality may only be
penalised in (d))

records y corresponding to M = −0.7 3✔

y in range 108 mm to 116 mm 4✔


for 2✔ condone linear extension of curve with negative gradient for
M < +0.5
1

OR

for incorrect M (3 MAX)

smooth curve etc 1✔


for 3✔ curve must extend to where read off is being made
1

line with negative gradient extrapolated (backwards) to M ≤ −0.35 2✔

records y corresponding to M = −0.35;

y in range 101 mm to 107 mm 34✔

OR

for linear graph (2 MAX)

ruled line with negative gradient extrapolated (backwards) to M ≤ −0.35 12✔

records y corresponding to M = −0.7;

y in range 101 mm to 107 mm 34✔


award of 4✔ is contingent on valid 3✔
for 4✔ answers that round to nearest mm are acceptable
1

Runnymede College Page 13 of 15


(d) correctly identifies error 1✔
for 1✔ reading has been taken at / from the top of the meniscus /
top of coloured oil / top of liquid
OR
should have taken / did not take reading from the bottom / lowest
point of the meniscus / lowest point on surface of coloured oil
OR
‘(student thinks) sub-divisions are 0.1 cm3 and not (as question
states) 0.2 cm3’
reject ‘should have read from bottom of coloured oil’ / ‘failed to read
meniscus properly’ / ‘read at the top of the air’ / ‘has read divisions
incorrectly’ or wtte
1

correct reading is 35.8 2✔


for 2✔ CAO
1

(e) gradient from Δ log(V / cm3) divided by Δ log(p / MPa); evaluated to ≥ 3 sf result between
−1.05 and −1.01 1✔
don’t insist on large steps / read off accuracy
accept result that rounds to 3sf between −1.05 and −1.01; sign
essential
1

relevant algebra enabling comparison with y = mx + c 2✔


for 2✔ (eg Boyle’s Law written as)
log V = − log p + constant
condone variation based on Ideal Gas Law in which case must
establish that (nR)T / (Nk)T is constant (which then implies Boyle’s
Law) (recognisable data book symbols only)
OR
(Figure 5 shows)
log V = gradient × log p + constant;
accept (log) k, (log) c etc as recognisable symbols for the constant;
condone (any) numerical value given for the constant eg 101.685;
accept m as recognisable symbol for the gradient
1

why gradient ≈ −1 confirms Boyle’s Law 3✔


for 3✔ allow gradient is / equals / should be −1
if 2✔ not given accept ‘gradient ≈ −1 demonstrates inverse
proportion or wtte
1

Runnymede College Page 14 of 15


(f) reads off and attempts to make use of log p1 AND log V1 for any point on the line 1✔
for 1✔ check log V1 is within half a grid square of correct position for
their log p1 or vice-versa;
‘make use of’ excludes use in a gradient calculation
V2 in range 10.5 to 11.5 (cm3) earns 1✔2✔3✔
1

applies a workable method 2✔


for 2✔ creditworthy examples are
a calculation of the intercept in Figure 5
eg log V + log p = 0.585
OR

use of gradient = (eg similar triangles idea)

OR
a calculation of p × V (by any means)
OR
use of log V = −1 × log 0.34 + their intercept
no credit for claiming 1.685 (or 1.170) are intercepts; this cannot
earn 2✔
1

further manipulation to determine unknown V2 3✔


for 3✔ accept result that rounds to 10.5 or 11.5;
accept 2sf 11 (cm3)
1

(g) temperature (of air) 1✔


for 1✔ accept ‘mean ke of air molecules’ (or wtte) / vapour pressure
of air’
‘keep mass of air constant’ is neutral (this information is given
below Figure 5)
1

change the pressure of the gas slowly or wtte

OR

wait (after a change) between taking readings / until the oil level stabilises 2✔
award of 2✔ is contingent on valid 1✔
for 2✔ condone ‘keep lab temperature constant’;
‘use a water bath’ is neutral
reject ‘do the experiment slowly’ / ‘do not heat the apparatus’ / ‘keep
windows closed’ etc
1
[19]

Runnymede College Page 15 of 15

You might also like