Paper 3 MS Feb2025
Paper 3 MS Feb2025
(31.8 V)
4
(58.9mA)
(use of 32 V gives 59(.2) mA)
(allow C.E. for value of Vrms from (a))
reason: others would give too large or too small a trace (1)
3
[9]
M / kg y / mm acceptable M × y min sf
0.5 89(.0) 44.5 / 45
2
1.0 82(.0) 82(.0)
1.5 76(.0) 114(.0)
2.0 71(.0) 142(.0)
3
2.5 66.5 166(.3)
3.0 62.5 187.5 / 188
for 2✔ two correct calculations of M × y
see table for min sf in result for M × y
OR
one correct calculation of M × y and an appropriate reverse-
working calculation;
statement rejecting inverse-proportion supported by suitable
quantitative reasoning, eg calculation of the percentage difference
between the results of their calculations;
condone ‘large’ / ‘significant differences’ (between calculation
results) / use of >> etc;
reject ‘values are different’ / ‘not same’ / ‘not constant’ / ‘not close
enough’ use of > etc;
reasoning must be based on the data points, eg reject ‘best-fit line
crosses y-axis’
1
OR
OR
OR
(e) gradient from Δ log(V / cm3) divided by Δ log(p / MPa); evaluated to ≥ 3 sf result between
−1.05 and −1.01 1✔
don’t insist on large steps / read off accuracy
accept result that rounds to 3sf between −1.05 and −1.01; sign
essential
1
OR
a calculation of p × V (by any means)
OR
use of log V = −1 × log 0.34 + their intercept
no credit for claiming 1.685 (or 1.170) are intercepts; this cannot
earn 2✔
1
OR
wait (after a change) between taking readings / until the oil level stabilises 2✔
award of 2✔ is contingent on valid 1✔
for 2✔ condone ‘keep lab temperature constant’;
‘use a water bath’ is neutral
reject ‘do the experiment slowly’ / ‘do not heat the apparatus’ / ‘keep
windows closed’ etc
1
[19]