Student grading system

WACHEMO UNIVERSITY
School of informatics

Department of software engineering

SRS documentation submitted for the student grading system

Project title: student grading system

GROUP MEMBER’S
Name ID Group
1. Musie Hadush------------ 1404580 ----------------------- 6
2. Amanuel birhane-------- 1402769 ----------------------- 6
3. Jalel keneni-------------- 1404050 ------------------------- 6
4. Abenezer alemu-------- 140 -------------------------- 6
5. Jemila koji-------------- 1404060 -------------------------- 6

1
Student grading system

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We would like to express our gratitude to all those who have contributed to the completion of
our group project on the student grading system. First and foremost, we would like to thank our
professor for providing us with the opportunity to work on this project and for guiding us
throughout the process. We appreciate your valuable feedback and support, which helped us to
improve our work. We would also like to acknowledge the contributions of our team members:
Musie, Amanuel, Abenezer, Jalel, and Jemila. Each of us brought unique skills and perspectives
to the project, and we worked together effectively to achieve our goals. We would like to thank
our classmates and friends who provided us with feedback and support throughout the project.
Your encouragement and suggestions helped us to refine our ideas and improve our work.
Finally, we would like to acknowledge the fundamental of software course, which provided us
with the knowledge and skills necessary to complete this project. We are grateful for the
opportunity to learn and grow through this course. Thank you to everyone who contributed to the
success of our project. We appreciate your support and guidance, and we look forward to
applying what we have learned in future projects. We would also like to thank the staff and
administrators of our university for providing us with the resources and facilities we needed to
complete this project. We are grateful for the access to the library, computer labs, and other
facilities that allowed us to conduct research and collaborate effectively. We would also like to
acknowledge the technical support staff who assisted us with any technical issues that arose
during the project. Additionally, we would like to express our appreciation to the participants
who volunteered to be part of the grading system trial. Without their willingness to participate
and provide feedback, we would not have been able to test and improve our system. Finally, we
would like to thank our families and loved ones for their unwavering support and encouragement
throughout our academic journey. We are grateful for your understanding and patience during
the times we had to devote to this project, and your love and support have been our source of
strength and motivation. Once again, we thank all those who have contributed to the success of
our project. Your support and guidance have been invaluable, and we will carry the lessons
learned and skills gained from this project to future endeavors.

Team member

2
Student grading system

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents pages

Chapter one

1.1 Introduction……………………………………………………………………

1.2. Background of the Organization………………………………………………………………………………

1.3. Statement of the Problem and Justification…………………………………………………………….

1.4. Objective of the project…………….………………………………………………................................

1.4.1. General objective…………………………………………………………………………………………………..

1.4.2. Specific objective(s)……………………………………………………………………………………………….

1.5. Methodologies …………………………………………………………………………………………………………

1.5.1. Requirement Elicitation Methodology …………………………………………………………………..

1.5.2. Requirement analysis and Modeling …………………………………………………………………….

1.5.3. System Implementation Methods ………………………………………………………………………….

. 1.6. Development and Environment Programming Tools………………………………………………..

1.6. Scope and Limitation of the Project…………………….…………………………………………………….

1.6.1. Scope…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…

1.6.2. Limitation…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

1.7. Significance and Beneficiaries of the project……………………………………………………………..

1.8. Feasibility analysis………………………………………………………………………………………………………

1.8.1. Operational/Organizational Feasibility………………………………………………………………….…

1.8.2. Technical Feasibility……………………………………………………………………………………………..……

1.8.4. Schedule Feasibility …………………………………………………………………………………………….…….

1.8.5. Legal Feasibility ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..……

ii 1.9. Risk Assessment …………………………………………………………………………………………..……………..

3
Student grading system

1.10. Work Breakdown ………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

1.10.1. Project plan Activities (Schedule) ……………………………………………………………………………..

1.10.2. Project Organization ……………………………………………………………………………………………..….

1.10.3. Team Organization (Composition and Communication plan) …………………………..………

1.11. Budget…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………..

Chapter two: requirement analysis and specifications

2.1. Description of the Current System…………………………………………………………………………….………

2.2. Players/Actors in the Existing System……………………………………………………………………………….

2.3. Use case Diagram for Existing System ……………………………………………………………………………….

2.4. Report Generation in Existing System…………………………………………………………….…………………

2.5. Form and Document used in the Existing System……………………………………..………….……………

2.6. Business Rule for Existing System………………………………………………………………….……………………

2.7. Proposed System ………………………………………………………………………………….………..…….……………

2.7.1. Overview of the New System ……………………………………………………………………………………………

2.7.2. Functional Requirements of the New System …………………………………………….…………………….

2.7.3. Non-Functional Requirements of the New System ……………………………………………..…………….

2.7.4. Actor and Use case Identification ……………………………………………………………….…………………….

2.7.5. Business Rule fir the New System ……………………………………………………………………………………….

2.7.6. System Model ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

2.7.6.1. Use case Model …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

2.7.6.1.1. Use Case Description ………………………………………………………………………..……………………………

2.7.6.2. Sequence Diagram …………………………………………………………………………….………………………………

2.7.6.3. State chart Diagram ………………………………………………………………….……………………………………...

2.7.6.4. Activity Diagram …………………………………………………………………………..……………………………………

2.7.6.5. Class Diagram ……………………………………………………………………………..……………………………………..

4
Student grading system

2.7.6.6. User Interface Prototyping ……………………………………………………………………………………………………

Chapter three: system design

3.1. Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………...

3.2. Purpose of the System………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...

3.3. Design Goals………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………….

3.4. Current Software Architecture…………………………………………………………………………………………………...

3.5. Proposed Software Architecture…………………………………………………………………….…………………………...

3.5.1 Subsystem Decomposition…………………………………………………………………………..…………………………….

3.5.2 Component Diagram…………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………...

3.5.3 Deployment Diagram…………………………………………………………………………..…………………………………….

3.5.4 Persistent Data Management……………………………………………………………………….…………………………...

3.5.5 Access Control and Security……………………………………………………………………….………………………………

3.5.6 Global Software Control…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

3.5.7 Boundary Conditions………………………………………………………………………….……………………………………...

Chapter four: implementation and testing

4.1. Algorithm Design and Coding ………………………………………………………………………………………………………

4.2. User Interface Design and Sample Code ……………………………………………….…………………………………….

4.3. Test Procedure …………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………………………

4.4. User Manual Preparation …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

4.5. Training And Installation ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

4.6. Startup Strategy ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

5
Student grading system

1. Introduction
Grading is an essential part of the educational process, and it is used to evaluate and provide
feedback on student work. A student grading system is a software application that automates the
process of grading student work, making it more efficient and accurate. The system allows
instructors to input grades for assignments, quizzes, and exams, and then calculates the final
grade for each student based on the grading policy and criteria established by the instructor. The
purpose of this document is to outline the system requirements for a student grading system,
including the functional and non-functional requirements, user interfaces, and system constraints.
This document will serve as a guide for the development team to design, develop, and test the
system. In this document, we will describe the different aspects of the student grading system,
including its purpose, scope, and objectives. We will also outline the different features and
functionalities of the system, as well as the different actors involved in the system. Finally, we
will describe the different types of relationships between the actors and use cases in the system.
This document is intended for the development team, stakeholders, and end-users of the student
grading system. In addition to improving the efficiency and accuracy of grading, a student
grading system can also provide several benefits to both instructors and students. For instructors,
the system can help to reduce the time and effort required for grading, allowing them to focus on
other aspects of teaching, such as lesson planning and student engagement. The system can also
help to ensure consistency in grading, as it uses predetermined criteria and policies to calculate
grades. For students, the system can provide timely and accurate feedback on their work,
allowing them to identify areas for improvement and to track their progress throughout the
course. Moreover, a student grading system can also facilitate communication between
instructors and students. The system can provide a platform for instructors to communicate with
students about their grades, assignments, and course progress, and for students to ask questions
and seek clarification on course materials and expectations. The system can also provide a
centralized location for students to access their grades and feedback, reducing the need for
manual tracking and record-keeping. Overall, a student grading system can be a powerful tool for
instructors and students alike, providing benefits such as improved efficiency, accuracy,
consistency, and communication.

1.2 background information

For the purpose of this SRS documentation, we will be focusing on a hypothetical organization
called "Wachemo University" that requires a student grading system. Wachemo University is a
large educational institution that offers a wide range of courses and programs to its students. The
university has a diverse student population, including undergraduate and graduate students, as
well as part-time and full-time students. The university has a team of instructors who are
responsible for grading student work and providing feedback. The current grading system at
Wachemo University is manual and time-consuming, which has led to delays in grading and
inconsistencies in grading across different instructors. The university has decided to implement a

6
Student grading system

student grading system that will automate the grading process and provide a more efficient and
accurate way of grading student work. The student grading system will be used by instructors to
input grades for assignments, quizzes, and exams, and then calculate the final grade for each
student based on the grading policy and criteria established by the instructor. The purpose of this
SRS documentation is to outline the system requirements for the student grading system at
Wachemo University, including the functional and non-functional requirements, user interfaces,
and system constraints. This document will serve as a guide for the development team to design,
develop, and test the system. An important metric for evaluating the performance of a language
model like the one used in the student grading system is its perplexity score. Perplexity is a
measure of how well the language model can predict the likelihood of a sequence of words. A
lower perplexity score indicates that the language model is better at predicting the likelihood of a
given sequence of words. In the context of the student grading system, a lower perplexity score
would mean that the language model is better at accurately grading student work based on the
grading policy and criteria established by the instructor. The development team will need to
optimize the language model to achieve a low perplexity score, which will require training the
model on a large corpus of relevant texts and continually fine-tuning it based on feedback from
instructors and students. In addition to optimizing the language model for perplexity, the
development team will also need to consider other factors such as scalability, usability, and
security. The system will need to be able to handle a large volume of student work and support
multiple instructors and courses.

The user interfaces should be intuitive and easy to use, with clear instructions and feedback. The
system should also be secure, with appropriate access controls and data encryption to protect
student privacy and prevent data breaches. By considering the perplexity score and other
important factors, the development team can ensure that the student grading system at Wachemo
University is not only efficient and accurate but also scalable, user-friendly, and secure. In
Ethiopia, education is highly valued and seen as a key to unlocking opportunities for individuals
and the country as a whole. However, there are still challenges such as limited access to quality
education, especially in rural areas, and a shortage of qualified teachers. Technology can play a
role in addressing these challenges by providing access to online learning resources and tools for
remote teaching and learning. It's important that any technology solutions developed for
education in Ethiopia take into account the unique cultural and linguistic diversity of the country,
as well as the need for affordability and accessibility. By leveraging technology in a thoughtful
and inclusive way, we can help to improve education outcomes and create a brighter future for
Ethiopia.

1.3 statements of problem and justification

The current grading system used by Wachemo University is manual and time-consuming, which
has led to delays in grading and inconsistencies in grading across different instructors. This has
resulted in a lack of standardization in grading, which can lead to confusion and frustration

7
Student grading system

among students. In addition, the manual grading system is prone to errors, which can lead to
incorrect grades being assigned to students. These errors can have serious consequences for
students, such as affecting their eligibility for scholarships or admission to graduate programs.

To address these issues, Wachemo University has decided to implement a student grading system
that will automate the grading process and provide a more efficient and accurate way of grading
student work. The student grading system will be used by instructors to input grades for
assignments, quizzes, and exams, and then calculate the final grade for each student based on the
grading policy and criteria established by the instructor.

The purpose of this SRS documentation is to outline the system requirements for the student
grading system at Wachemo University. The system requirements will include the functional and
non-functional requirements, user interfaces, and system constraints. The SRS documentation
will serve as a guide for the development team to design, develop, and test the system.

The implementation of the student grading system will provide several benefits to Wachemo
University, including:

 Increased efficiency in grading student work

 Improved accuracy in grading
 Standardization of grading across different instructors
 Reduction in errors in grading
 Improved communication of grades to students
 Enhanced student satisfaction and engagement
Another benefit of implementing a student grading system is that it can help to streamline
administrative tasks related to grading, such as record-keeping and reporting. The system can
provide a centralized location for all grading-related data, making it easier for administrators to
track student progress, generate reports, and analyze grading trends over time. This can help to
improve decision-making related to course offerings, curricular changes, and resource allocation,
as administrators will have access to more accurate and timely data on student performance.

Additionally, the student grading system can also help to promote accountability and
transparency in the grading process. By providing a digital record of all grading-related
activities, the system can help to identify and address any issues related to grading, such as
discrepancies or errors in grading. This can help to build trust among stakeholders, such as
students, instructors, and administrators, and promote a culture of continuous improvement in the
grading process.

Finally, the implementation of a student grading system can also help to future-proof the
university's grading process, as it provides a scalable and adaptable solution that can evolve over
time to meet changing needs and priorities. As new technologies and teaching methodologies

8
Student grading system

emerge, the student grading system can be updated and expanded to incorporate these
innovations, helping to ensure that Wachemo University remains at the forefront of educational
excellence.

In summary, the current manual grading system used by Wachemo University has several issues
that need to be addressed. The implementation of a student grading system will provide several
benefits to the university, including increased efficiency, improved accuracy, and standardization
of grading. The SRS documentation will serve as a guide for the development team to design,
develop, and test the system.

1.4 Objective of the student grading system

1.4.1 General objective of student grading system
The general objective of the student grading system according to the Ethiopian curriculum for
SRS documentation is to assess the academic performance of students in a fair and effective
manner, taking into account the flexibility in teaching and learning methodologies and strategies.
The grading system should provide a comprehensive evaluation of student learning on a
continuous assessment basis through tests, assignments, presentations, and other activities. The
grading system should also aim to ease the examination-related pressure from the students and
assess the student's ability not only based on academic performance but also on other activities
like internal assignments, classroom projects, and answering ability. The grading system should
provide students with an idea about their weaknesses and strengths and help mold them to make
studies less monotonous. The grading system should encourage flexibility in teaching and
learning methodologies and strategies and require a shift in teachers' thinking to achieve this
goal. The grading system should also support teachers in their daily practice through clear
student goals and grading criteria and build capacity through adequate training. Finally, the
grading system should be individualized and consider legal accommodations for students with an
IEP, and documentation of a grading accommodation must appear in her records. In addition to
the objectives mentioned, it is important to consider the role of technology in the implementation
of a student grading system. Technology can be used to streamline the grading process, reduce
errors, and provide real-time feedback to students. For example, online grading systems can
automate the process of assigning grades and provide students with instant feedback on their
performance. This can help to improve student engagement and motivation by providing them
with a more interactive and personalized learning experience.

Another important consideration is the need to ensure that the grading system is aligned with the
broader goals of the Ethiopian education system. This includes promoting critical thinking,
problem-solving skills, and creativity, as well as fostering a sense of social responsibility and
civic engagement. The grading system should be designed to reflect these broader goals and
encourage students to develop a range of skills that are essential for success in the 21st century.

9
Student grading system

It is also important to consider the role of assessment in the grading system. Assessment should
be used to identify areas of strength and weakness in student learning, as well as to guide
instructional decisions. This can include using formative assessments to provide ongoing
feedback to students, as well as summative assessments to evaluate student learning at the end of
a unit or course.

Finally, it is important to ensure that the grading system is inclusive and equitable for all
students. This includes providing accommodations for students with disabilities or other special
needs, as well as addressing issues of bias and discrimination in the grading process. By
addressing these issues, it is possible to design a grading system that is fair, effective, and
supportive of student learning and success.

1.4.2 Specific objective of student grading system

 Here are some of the specific objectives of student grading system:
 To develop a grading system that assesses the academic performance of students in a fair
and effective manner, taking into account the flexibility in teaching and learning
methodologies and strategies.
 To create a grading system that provides a comprehensive evaluation of student learning
on a continuous assessment basis through tests, assignments, presentations, and other
activities.
 To design a grading system that eases the examination-related pressure from the students
and assesses the student's ability not only based on academic performance but also on
other activities like internal assignments, classroom projects, and answering ability.
 To develop a grading system that provides students with an idea about their weaknesses
and strengths and helps mold them to make studies less monotonous.
 To create a grading system that encourages flexibility in teaching and learning
methodologies and strategies and requires a shift in teachers' thinking to achieve this
goal.
 To design a grading system that supports teachers in their daily practice through clear
student goals and grading criteria and builds capacity through adequate training.
 To create a grading system that is individualized and considers legal accommodations for
students with an IEP, and documentation of a grading accommodation must appear in her
records.
 To develop a grading system that is user-friendly and easy to use for teachers, students,
and administrators.
 To create a grading system that is accurate, reliable, and consistent in grading student
performance.
 To design a grading system that is compatible with SRS documentation and can be easily
integrated into the existing system.

10
Student grading system

 In addition to the objectives mentioned, it is important to consider the role of data

analysis in the grading system. By collecting and analyzing data on student performance,
it is possible to identify trends and patterns that can inform instructional decisions and
improve student learning outcomes. This can include using data to identify areas of
weakness and develop targeted interventions to address these areas, as well as using data
to evaluate the effectiveness of instructional strategies and make adjustments as needed.

 Another important consideration is the need to ensure that the grading system is aligned
with the needs and goals of different stakeholders, including students, parents, teachers,
and administrators. This can be achieved by soliciting feedback from these stakeholders
and incorporating their input into the design and implementation of the grading system.
By doing so, it is possible to create a grading system that is responsive to the needs and
interests of all stakeholders and promotes collaboration and engagement.
 It is also important to consider the role of professional development in the
implementation of the grading system. Teachers and administrators should receive
ongoing training and support to ensure that they are able to effectively implement and use
the grading system. This can include training on how to use the grading system, how to
interpret and use data, and how to provide effective feedback to students.

 Finally, it is important to ensure that the grading system is adaptable and responsive to
changing needs and circumstances. This can include making adjustments to the grading
system as needed based on feedback from stakeholders, changes in the curriculum or
instructional strategies, or changes in legal requirements or regulations. By incorporating
flexibility and adaptability into the design of the grading system, it is possible to create a
system that is sustainable and effective over the long term.

1.5 Methodologies
1.5.1 Requirement Elicitation Methodology
Requirement elicitation is the process of identifying, gathering, and documenting the
requirements for a system or project. A well-defined requirement elicitation methodology is
essential for the development of a successful student grading system. Here are some steps that
could be followed as a requirement elicitation methodology for a student grading system:

 Identify stakeholders: The first step is to identify all the stakeholders involved in the
student grading system, including students, teachers, administrators, and parents.
Stakeholders can be identified through interviews, surveys, and focus groups.

11
Student grading system

 Define objectives: The objectives of the system should be clearly defined, including what
the system is intended to accomplish and what benefits it should provide to stakeholders.
This can be done through brainstorming sessions and workshops with the stakeholders.

 Gather requirements: Once the stakeholders and objectives have been identified, the next
step is to gather the requirements for the system. This can be done through various
techniques such as interviews, surveys, questionnaires, and observation.

 Analyze requirements: After gathering the requirements, they need to be analyzed to

ensure they are complete, consistent, and feasible. This will involve prioritizing the
requirements and identifying any conflicts or contradictions.

 Document requirements: The requirements need to be documented in a clear and concise

manner, using standard templates and formats. This documentation will serve as the basis
for the system design and development.

 Validate requirements: The requirements need to be validated to ensure they accurately

reflect the needs of the stakeholders and can be met by the system. This can be done
through review and feedback from stakeholders, as well as testing and prototyping.

 Manage requirements: Finally, the requirements need to be managed throughout the

development process, including tracking changes, updating documentation, and ensuring
that the requirements are met by the final system.

 Overall, a thorough and well-defined requirement elicitation methodology is essential for

the successful development of a student grading system. By following these steps, it is
possible to ensure that the system meets the needs of all stakeholders and provides a fair
and effective means of evaluating student performance.
 To further refine the requirement elicitation methodology for a student grading system
according to the Ethiopian curriculum for SRS documentation, the following steps can be
added:

12
Student grading system

 Prioritize requirements: After analyzing the requirements, they need to be prioritized

based on their importance and feasibility. This will help in developing a system that
meets the most critical needs of the stakeholders.
 Define system constraints: The system constraints need to be defined, including any
technical, budgetary, or time-related limitations. This will help in developing a system
that is feasible and realistic.
 Develop use cases: Use cases need to be developed to describe how the system will be
used by the stakeholders. This will help in identifying any gaps or inconsistencies in the
requirements and ensure that the system meets the needs of all stakeholders.
 Prototype and test: Prototyping and testing need to be done to ensure that the system
meets the requirements and is user-friendly. This will involve developing a working
model of the system and testing it with the stakeholders to identify any issues or areas for
improvement.
 Develop documentation: Documentation needs to be developed for the system, including
user manuals, technical manuals, and training materials. This will help in ensuring that
the system is used effectively and efficiently by all stakeholders.
 By following these additional steps, the requirement elicitation methodology for a student
grading system according to the Ethiopian curriculum for SRS documentation can be
further refined, ensuring that the system meets the needs of all stakeholders and is
feasible and realistic.

In addition to the steps mentioned, it is important to consider the ethical implications of the
student grading system, particularly with regards to privacy and data security. The grading
system will involve the collection and storage of sensitive information about students,
including their academic performance, personal details, and any accommodations or
modifications they require. It is important to ensure that this information is kept confidential
and secure, and that only authorized personnel have access to it.

Another important consideration is the need to ensure that the grading system is culturally
responsive and inclusive of all students, regardless of their background or identity. This
includes considering the cultural norms and values of different communities, as well as
addressing issues of bias and discrimination in the grading process. By taking these factors
into account, it is possible to design a grading system that promotes equity and social justice
and takes into account the diverse needs and experiences of all students.

Finally, it is important to ensure that the grading system is aligned with the broader goals of
the Ethiopian education system, including promoting critical thinking, problem-solving
skills, and creativity, as well as fostering a sense of social responsibility and civic

13
Student grading system

engagement. The grading system should be designed to reflect these broader goals and
encourage students to develop a range of skills that are essential for success in the 21st
century. By considering these factors, it is possible to develop a student grading system that
is effective, ethical, and supportive of student learning and success.

1.5.2. Requirement analysis and Modeling

Requirement analysis and modeling are important steps in the development of a student grading
system. Here are some steps that could be followed for requirement analysis and modeling:

1. Identify stakeholders: The first step is to identify all the stakeholders involved in the
student grading system, including students, teachers, administrators, and parents.
2. Gather requirements: Once the stakeholders have been identified, the next step is to
gather the requirements for the system. This can be done through various techniques such
as interviews, surveys, questionnaires, and observation.
3. Analyze requirements: After gathering the requirements, they need to be analyzed to
ensure they are complete, consistent, and feasible. This will involve prioritizing the
requirements and identifying any conflicts or contradictions.
4. Develop use cases: Use cases need to be developed to describe how the system will be
used by the stakeholders.
5. Model the system: Based on the use cases and requirements, a system model needs to be
developed. This can be done using various modeling techniques such as UML diagrams,
flowcharts, and data flow diagrams.
6. Identify system components: The system components need to be identified and defined,
including the user interface, database, and back-end processes.
7. Define system behavior: The behavior of the system needs to be defined, including how it
will handle data input, processing, and output.
8. Develop prototypes: Prototypes need to be developed to test the system model and gather
feedback from stakeholders.
9. Validate the model: The system model needs to be validated to ensure that it accurately
represents the requirements and use cases.
10. Refine the model: Based on feedback from stakeholders and testing, the system model
needs to be refined and improved.

11. To further refine the requirement analysis and modeling for a student grading system
according to the Ethiopian curriculum for SRS documentation, the following steps can be
added:

12. Define grading criteria: The grading criteria need to be defined, including the weightage
assigned to different components such as assignments, tests, and projects. This will help in
ensuring that the grading is fair and consistent.

14
Student grading system

13. Develop a grading rubric: A grading rubric needs to be developed to provide clear
guidelines for grading student performance. This will help in ensuring that the grading is
objective and transparent.

14. Define reporting requirements: The reporting requirements need to be defined, including
what information needs to be included in the reports and how the reports will be generated.
This will help in ensuring that the reports are accurate and useful for stakeholders.

15. Develop a user interface: A user interface needs to be developed that is user-friendly and
easy to use for teachers, students, and administrators. This will help in ensuring that the
system is adopted and used effectively.

16. Test and validate the system: The system needs to be tested and validated to ensure that it
meets the requirements and is user-friendly. This will involve testing the system with
stakeholders and identifying any issues or areas for improvement.

17. Refine the system: Based on feedback from stakeholders and testing, the system needs to
be refined and improved. This will involve making changes to the system design and
functionality to ensure that it meets the needs of all stakeholders.

By following these additional steps, the requirement analysis and modeling for a student grading
system according to the Ethiopian curriculum for SRS documentation can be further refined,
ensuring that the system meets the needs of all stakeholders and provides a fair and effective
means of evaluating student performance.

Additionally, it is important to consider the scalability of the system to ensure that it can
accommodate a growing number of users and data. This will involve designing the system to
handle large amounts of data and users, as well as ensuring that it can be easily expanded or
upgraded as needed.

Another important consideration is the need to ensure that the system is interoperable with other
systems used in the education ecosystem, such as learning management systems, student
information systems, and assessment systems. This will involve designing the system to be
compatible with existing standards and protocols, as well as ensuring that data can be easily
exchanged between systems.

It is also important to consider the need for ongoing maintenance and support for the system.
This will involve developing a plan for system maintenance and upgrades, as well as ensuring
that there is adequate support for users in the event of issues or questions.

Finally, it is important to ensure that the system is compliant with relevant legal and regulatory
requirements, including data privacy and security laws, accessibility requirements, and other
relevant regulations. This will involve conducting a thorough legal and regulatory review of the
system and ensuring that it meets all applicable requirements.

15
Student grading system

1.5.3. System Implementation Methods

System implementation is the process of putting the student grading system into operation. Here
are some system implementation methods that could be followed for a student grading system
according to the Ethiopian curriculum:

 Pilot testing: A small-scale pilot test can be conducted to test the system in a real-world
setting with a small group of users. This can help identify any issues or areas for
improvement before the system is rolled out to a larger audience.
 Phased implementation: The system can be implemented in phases, starting with a small
group of users and gradually expanding to a larger audience. This can help ensure that the
system is working properly before it is rolled out to a larger audience.
 Parallel implementation: The new system can be implemented in parallel with the
existing system for a period of time to ensure that it is working properly and to ensure a
smooth transition.
 Big bang implementation: The new system can be implemented all at once, replacing the
existing system. This method requires careful planning and preparation to ensure that the
transition is smooth and that all users are trained and prepared.
 Outsourcing implementation: The implementation of the system can be outsourced to a
third-party vendor or consultant who specializes in system implementation. This can be a
good option for organizations that do not have the expertise or resources to implement the
system internally.
 In-house implementation: The implementation of the system can be done in-house, with
the organization's own IT team or staff. This can be a good option for organizations that
have the expertise and resources to implement the system internally.
 Overall, the implementation method chosen will depend on the organization's resources,
expertise, and goals for the student grading system. By carefully considering the
implementation options and selecting the most appropriate method, it is possible to
ensure a successful implementation of the student grading system according to the
Ethiopian curriculum.
 To further refine the system implementation for a student grading system according to the
Ethiopian curriculum for SRS documentation, the following steps can be added:
 Develop a training plan: A training plan needs to be developed to ensure that all
stakeholders are trained on how to use the system effectively. This will involve
developing training materials, scheduling training sessions, and providing ongoing
support.
 Conduct user acceptance testing: User acceptance testing needs to be conducted to ensure
that the system meets the needs of all stakeholders and is user-friendly. This will involve
testing the system with a group of representative users and gathering feedback.

16
Student grading system

 Develop a rollout plan: A rollout plan needs to be developed to ensure that the system is
rolled out smoothly and effectively. This will involve developing a timeline, identifying
key milestones, and communicating with stakeholders.
 Provide ongoing support: Ongoing support needs to be provided to ensure that the system
continues to meet the needs of all stakeholders. This will involve providing technical
support, addressing issues and concerns, and providing training and resources as needed.
 Monitor and evaluate the system: The system needs to be monitored and evaluated to
ensure that it is meeting the needs of all stakeholders and is effective in evaluating
student performance. This will involve gathering feedback from stakeholders, analyzing
system usage data, and making improvements as needed.
 By following these additional steps, the system implementation for a student grading
system according to the Ethiopian curriculum for SRS documentation can be further
refined, ensuring that the system is rolled out smoothly and effectively and continues to
meet the needs of all stakeholders over time.
1.6 Development and Environment Programming Tools
The development and programming tools used for a student grading system for the Ethiopian
curriculum will depend on various factors such as the preferred programming language, the
platform, and the specific requirements of the system. However, here are some commonly used
development and programming tools for student grading systems:

a. Programming languages: Some popular programming languages for developing

student grading systems include Java, Python, C++, and PHP.
b. Integrated Development Environments (IDEs): IDEs are software applications
that provide a comprehensive development environment for programmers. Some
popular IDEs for developing student grading systems include Eclipse, NetBeans,
Visual Studio Code, and PyCharm.
c. Web frameworks: If the student grading system is web-based, web frameworks
such as Django, Ruby on Rails, and Flask can be used to simplify the
development process and create a more efficient and scalable system.
d. Database management systems: A database management system such as MySQL,
PostgreSQL, or Oracle can be used to manage the data for the student grading
system.
e. Version control systems: Version control systems such as Git and SVN can be
used to track changes to the system code and collaborate with other developers.
f. Testing frameworks: Testing frameworks such as JUnit, Selenium, and TestNG
can be used to automate testing and ensure that the system is functioning properly.
g. Project management tools: Project management tools such as Jira, Trello, and
Asana can be used to manage the development process and collaborate with other
team members.

17
Student grading system

 To further refine the development and programming tools for a student grading system
according to the Ethiopian curriculum for SRS documentation, the following points can
be added:
 Accessibility tools: Accessibility tools such as screen readers, magnifiers, and keyboard
navigation need to be considered to ensure that the system is accessible to all users,
including those with disabilities.
 Security tools: Security tools such as firewalls, encryption, and access controls need to be
implemented to ensure that the system is secure and protects sensitive student data.
 Cloud-based tools: Cloud-based tools such as Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure,
and Google Cloud Platform can be used to host the student grading system and provide
scalability, reliability, and cost-effectiveness.
 Mobile application development tools: Mobile application development tools such as
React Native, Flutter, and Xamarin can be used to develop mobile applications for the
student grading system, providing users with a convenient and accessible way to access
the system.
 Analytics tools: Analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Mixpanel can be used to
gather data on system usage and user behavior, providing insights into how the system
can be improved and optimized.

By considering these additional development and programming tools, it is possible to develop a

student grading system that is efficient, effective, secure, and accessible to all users.
Furthermore, it is important to consider the scalability and flexibility of the development and
programming tools used for the student grading system. This will involve selecting tools that can
accommodate a growing number of users and data, as well as ensuring that the system can be
easily expanded or upgraded as needed.

The development and programming tools used for a student grading system for the Ethiopian
curriculum should be carefully selected based on the specific requirements of the system and the
expertise of the development team. By using the right tools and resources, it is possible to
develop a student grading system that is efficient, effective, and aligned with the needs of the
Ethiopian education system.

Another important consideration is the need to ensure that the development and programming
tools are compatible with other systems used in the education ecosystem, such as learning
management systems, student information systems, and assessment systems. This will involve
designing the system to be compatible with existing standards and protocols, as well as ensuring
that data can be easily exchanged between systems.

It is also important to ensure that the development and programming tools are compliant with
relevant legal and regulatory requirements, including data privacy and security laws,

18
Student grading system

accessibility requirements, and other relevant regulations. This will involve conducting a
thorough legal and regulatory review of the development and programming tools and ensuring
that they meet all applicable requirements.

Finally, it is important to ensure that the development and programming tools are appropriate for
the development team's expertise and skill level. This will involve selecting tools that the
development team is familiar with and ensuring that they have the necessary training and
resources to effectively use the tools to develop the student grading system.

1.6. Scope and Limitation of the Project

1.6.1 Scope:

The student grading system is designed to assess the academic performance of students in a fair
and effective manner, taking into account the flexibility in teaching and learning methodologies
and strategies.

The system can be used to evaluate student learning on a continuous assessment basis through
tests, assignments, presentations, and other activities.

The system can provide a comprehensive evaluation of student learning and help identify areas
of strengths and weaknesses.

The system can be used to ease the examination-related pressure from the students and assess the
student's ability not only based on academic performance but also on other activities like internal
assignments, classroom projects, and answering ability.

The system can be used to provide students with an idea about their academic progress and help
mold them to make studies less monotonous.

The system can be used to encourage flexibility in teaching and learning methodologies and
strategies and require a shift in teachers' thinking to achieve this goal.

The system can be used to support teachers in their daily practice through clear student goals and
grading criteria and build capacity through adequate training.

The system can be used to generate reports and provide feedback to students, teachers, and
parents.

To further expand the scope of the student grading system, the following points can be added:

The system can be used to identify areas where additional support or intervention may be
necessary for struggling students. This can help teachers and administrators to provide targeted
support and resources to help students succeed.

19
Student grading system

The system can be used to encourage student engagement and motivation by providing regular
feedback and recognition for achievements. This can help to build a positive learning
environment and promote a growth mindset among students.

The system can be used to promote transparency and accountability by ensuring that grading
criteria and standards are clearly communicated to students, teachers, and parents. This can help
to build trust and confidence in the education system and promote a culture of academic
excellence.

The system can be used to support data-driven decision making by providing administrators and
policymakers with insights into student performance and progress. This can help to inform policy
and resource allocation decisions and ensure that resources are being used effectively.

The system can be used to promote equity and fairness in the education system by ensuring that
all students are evaluated fairly and objectively, regardless of their background or identity. This
can help to reduce disparities in student achievement and promote a more equitable and inclusive
education system.

Expanding on the points mentioned earlier, the student grading system can be a powerful tool for
promoting student learning and achievement in a number of ways.

By providing regular feedback and recognition for achievements, the system can help to motivate
and engage students, building a positive learning environment where students feel valued and
supported. This can help to foster a growth mindset among students, encouraging them to take
risks and try new things, knowing that their efforts will be recognized and rewarded.

Moreover, the system can be used to identify areas where students may be struggling and provide
targeted support and resources to help them succeed. This can include interventions such as one-
on-one tutoring, additional instructional materials, or targeted feedback and coaching from
teachers.

In addition, the system can promote transparency and accountability by ensuring that grading
criteria and standards are clearly communicated to students, teachers, and parents. This can help
to build trust and confidence in the education system and promote a culture of academic
excellence, where students are held to high standards of achievement and are expected to meet
those standards.

Moreover, the system can support data-driven decision making by providing administrators and
policymakers with insights into student performance and progress. This can help to inform policy
and resource allocation decisions and ensure that resources are being used effectively to support
student learning and achievement.

Finally, the system can promote equity and fairness in the education system by ensuring that all
students are evaluated fairly and objectively, regardless of their background or identity. This can

20
Student grading system

help to reduce disparities in student achievement and promote a more equitable and inclusive
education system, where all students have access to the resources and support they need to
succeed.

1.6.2 Limitations
 The grading system may not accurately reflect what a student is learning.
 The grading system may not provide a complete picture of a student's abilities and
strengths.
 The grading system may be subject to errors and inconsistencies in grading.
 The grading system may be limited by the quality of the assessments used to evaluate
student learning.
 The grading system may be limited by the availability of resources and technology.
 The grading system may be limited by the expertise and training of the teachers and
administrators who use it.
 The grading system may be limited by cultural and social factors that affect how students
and teachers view academic performance.
 The grading system may be limited by legal and ethical considerations related to student
privacy and data protection.
 Overall, the scope and limitation of the student grading system need to be carefully
considered to ensure that the system meets the needs of all stakeholders and provides a
fair and effective means of evaluating student performance.

To further expand on the limitations of the student grading system, the following points can be
added:

The grading system may not be able to account for differences in student learning styles and
preferences. Students may have different strengths, weaknesses, and learning needs, and the
grading system may not be able to capture these nuances.

The grading system may be influenced by external factors such as socioeconomic status, cultural
background, and language proficiency, which can affect student performance and create
disparities in grading.

The grading system may be limited by the availability of resources and support for students with
special needs, which can make it difficult to accurately assess their learning and progress.

The grading system may be subject to bias and subjectivity in grading, which can create
inconsistencies and inaccuracies in the evaluation of student performance. This can be
particularly problematic if teachers have different standards or expectations for grading.

21
Student grading system

The grading system may be limited in its ability to measure non-cognitive skills and
competencies, such as teamwork, problem-solving, and creativity, which are increasingly seen as
important indicators of success in the 21st century workforce.

Despite these limitations, the student grading system remains an important tool for evaluating
student performance and promoting academic excellence. By carefully considering the scope and
limitations of the system, educators and policymakers can work to develop a fair and effective
grading system that meets the needs of all stakeholders and supports student learning and
achievement.

Expanding on the limitations of the student grading system, it is important to note that the system
may not be able to capture the full range of skills, knowledge, and competencies that students
need to succeed in the modern world. In addition to academic knowledge, students also need to
develop a wide range of non-cognitive skills such as communication, critical thinking, problem-
solving, collaboration, and creativity. These skills are increasingly valued by employers and are
essential for success in the 21st century workforce.

Moreover, the grading system may not be able to account for differences in student background,
culture, and language proficiency. Students from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds
may have different learning needs and may require different types of assessments to accurately
evaluate their learning. In addition, students from low-income families may face additional
challenges that can affect their academic performance, such as limited access to resources and
support.

Furthermore, the grading system may be influenced by bias and subjectivity in grading, which
can create inconsistencies and inaccuracies in the evaluation of student performance. There may
be differences in grading standards and expectations among different teachers, which can lead to
differences in student grades. In addition, teachers may have implicit biases that can affect their
perceptions of student performance, particularly with regard to race, gender, and socioeconomic
status.

Despite these limitations, the student grading system remains an important tool for evaluating
student performance and promoting academic excellence. By carefully considering the scope and
limitations of the system, educators and policymakers can work to develop a fair and effective
grading system that meets the needs of all students, promotes equity and inclusion, and supports
student learning and achievement. This can involve a range of strategies, such as developing
alternative assessments, providing additional support and resources for students with special
needs, and providing professional development and training to teachers and administrators to
ensure that grading is fair and consistent.

1.7. Significance and Beneficiaries of the student grading system

22
Student grading system

The student grading system has significant benefits for various stakeholders involved in the
education system. Here are some of the beneficiaries and significance of the student grading
system:

 Students: The student grading system provides students with a clear understanding of
their academic performance and progress. It helps them identify their strengths and
weaknesses and set goals for improvement. The grading system also motivates students
to work harder and achieve better grades.
 Teachers: The grading system helps teachers evaluate student learning and provide
feedback to students. It also helps teachers identify areas where students need additional
support and adjust their teaching methods accordingly. The grading system also provides
teachers with a standardized way to communicate student performance to parents and
other stakeholders.
 Parents: The grading system provides parents with a clear understanding of their child's
academic performance and progress. It helps them identify areas where their child needs
additional support and work with teachers to develop a plan for improvement. The
grading system also helps parents monitor their child's academic progress and set goals
for improvement.
 Educational institutions: The grading system provides educational institutions with a
standardized way to evaluate student learning and performance. It helps institutions
identify areas where they need to improve their teaching methods and curriculum. The
grading system also helps institutions evaluate the effectiveness of their educational
programs and make necessary changes.
 Employers: The grading system provides employers with a way to evaluate the academic
performance of job candidates. It helps them identify candidates with the necessary skills
and knowledge to perform the job effectively.

Overall, the student grading system is significant in evaluating student learning and performance,
providing feedback to students, teachers, and parents, and improving the quality of education. It
benefits students, teachers, parents, educational institutions, and employers by providing a
standardized way to evaluate academic performance and progress. However, the grading system
has some limitations, such as not accurately reflecting what a student is learning and being
subject to errors and inconsistencies in grading.

To further expand on the significance of the student grading system, it is important to note that it
can also play a role in promoting accountability and transparency in the education system. By
providing a standardized way to evaluate student learning and performance, the grading system
can help to ensure that all students are held to the same standards of achievement and that grades
are awarded fairly and objectively.

Moreover, the grading system can be used to promote continuous improvement and innovation in
teaching and learning. By providing regular feedback and evaluation of student performance, the

23
Student grading system

grading system can help teachers and educational institutions to identify areas where they need to
improve their teaching methods and curriculum. This can help to promote a culture of continuous
learning and improvement, where teachers and educational institutions are constantly striving to
improve their practice and provide the best possible education for students.

Furthermore, the grading system can be used to promote equity and social justice in the
education system. By ensuring that all students are evaluated fairly and objectively, regardless of
their background or identity, the grading system can help to reduce disparities in student
achievement and promote a more inclusive and equitable education system. This can help to
ensure that all students have access to the resources and support they need to succeed, regardless
of their race, gender, socioeconomic status, or other factors.

Overall, the student grading system has significant benefits for students, teachers, parents,
educational institutions, and employers. By providing a standardized and objective way to
evaluate student learning and performance, the grading system can help to promote
accountability, transparency, continuous improvement, and social justice in the education
system. However, it is important to be aware of its limitations and to work towards developing a
fair and effective grading system that meets the needs of all stakeholders and supports student
learning and achievement.

1.8. Feasibility analysis

1.8.1 Operational/Organizational Feasibility

Operational and organizational feasibility are important factors to consider when developing a
student grading system. Here are some points to consider:

Operational Feasibility:

 The student grading system should be easy to use and user-friendly for teachers, students,
and administrators.
 The system should be scalable and able to handle a large volume of data and users.
 The system should be reliable and available 24/7 to ensure that stakeholders can access it
when needed.
 The system should be secure and protect sensitive student data from unauthorized access
or breaches.
 The system should be compatible with existing technology infrastructure and software
used by the educational institution.

Organizational Feasibility:

 The student grading system should align with the goals and objectives of the educational
institution.

24
Student grading system

 The system should be compatible with the existing policies and procedures of the
educational institution.
 The system should be supported by the necessary resources, including funding, staff, and
technology.
 The system should be integrated with other educational systems and processes, such as
student information systems and learning management systems.
 The system should be supported by adequate training and support for teachers, students,
and administrators.

the operational and organizational feasibility of the student grading system is essential to ensure
that the system is effective, efficient, and aligned with the needs of the educational institution.
By considering these factors, it is possible to develop a student grading system that meets the
needs of all stakeholders and provides a fair and effective means of evaluating student
performance.

Expanding on the importance of operational and organizational feasibility in developing a

student grading system, it is essential to ensure that the system is sustainable in the long term.
This means that the system must be designed with scalability, adaptability, and sustainability in
mind. As the educational institution evolves and grows, the grading system must be able to adapt
to changing needs and requirements.

Moreover, the system should be designed with the input and involvement of all stakeholders,
including teachers, students, parents, and administrators. This can help to ensure that the system
is aligned with the needs and goals of the educational institution and that it meets the
expectations of all stakeholders.

In addition, the system should be designed with a focus on continuous improvement and
innovation. This can involve regular evaluation and assessment of the system's effectiveness, as
well as ongoing feedback and input from stakeholders. By continuously improving and evolving
the system, it is possible to ensure that it remains relevant and effective in meeting the needs of
the educational institution.

it is important to consider the ethical and legal implications of the student grading system,
particularly with regard to student privacy and data protection. The system must comply with all
relevant laws and regulations related to data privacy and protection, and must be designed with
the security and protection of sensitive student data in mind.

by considering the operational and organizational feasibility of the student grading system, it is
possible to develop a system that is effective, efficient, and sustainable in the long term. This can
help to promote student learning and achievement, support teacher and administrator decision-
making, and ensure that the educational institution is meeting its goals and objectives.

25
Student grading system

To further expand on the importance of operational and organizational feasibility in developing a

student grading system, it is important to note that the system should be designed with a focus on
usability and accessibility. This means that the grading system should be designed with the needs
and preferences of all stakeholders in mind, including teachers, students, parents, and
administrators.

For example, the system should be designed with a user-friendly interface that is easy to navigate
and understand. It should also be designed with the ability to customize settings and preferences
to meet the individual needs of users. This can include features such as the ability to set grading
scales, weighting factors, and gradebook preferences.

Moreover, the system should be designed with a focus on scalability and adaptability. This
means that the system should be able to handle a large volume of data and users, and should be
able to adapt to changing needs and requirements over time. It should also be designed with the
ability to integrate with other educational systems and processes, such as student information
systems and learning management systems.

In addition, the system should be designed with a focus on security and data protection. This
means that the system should be designed with appropriate security measures to protect sensitive
student data from unauthorized access or breaches. It should also be designed with the ability to
backup and restore data in the event of a system failure or data loss.

Finally, the system should be designed with a focus on continuous improvement and innovation.
This means that the system should be evaluated regularly to ensure that it is meeting the needs of
all stakeholders and that it is aligned with the goals and objectives of the educational institution.
It should also be designed with the ability to incorporate feedback and input from stakeholders,
and to adapt to changing needs and requirements over time.

Overall, by considering the operational and organizational feasibility of the student grading
system, it is possible to develop a system that is effective, efficient, and sustainable in the long
term. This can help to promote student learning and achievement, support teacher and
administrator decision-making, and ensure that the educational institution is meeting its goals
and objectives.

1.8.2. Technical Feasibility

Technical feasibility is an important factor to consider when developing a student grading
system. Here are some points to consider:

Hardware and software requirements: The student grading system should be compatible with the
hardware and software used by the educational institution. This includes compatibility with
operating systems, web browsers, and other software applications.

26
Student grading system

Database management: The student grading system should have a robust database management
system that can handle a large volume of data and users. The system should be able to store and
retrieve data quickly and efficiently.

User interface: The student grading system should have a user-friendly interface that is easy to
navigate and use. The interface should be designed to meet the needs of all stakeholders,
including teachers, students, and administrators.

Security: The student grading system should have strong security features to protect sensitive
student data from unauthorized access or breaches. This includes encryption, access controls, and
firewalls.

Scalability: The student grading system should be scalable and able to handle a large volume of
data and users. The system should be designed to grow and expand as the educational institution
grows.

Integration: The student grading system should be integrated with other educational systems and
processes, such as student information systems and learning management systems. This will help
ensure that the system is aligned with the needs of the educational institution.

Testing and debugging: The student grading system should be thoroughly tested and debugged to
ensure that it is functioning properly and free from errors. This will involve testing the system
with a group of representative users and gathering feedback.

Overall, the technical feasibility of the student grading system is essential to ensure that the
system is effective, efficient, and aligned with the needs of the educational institution. By
considering these factors, it is possible to develop a student grading system that meets the needs
of all stakeholders and provides a fair and effective means of evaluating student performance

Expanding on the importance of technical feasibility in developing a student grading system, it is

important to consider the system's architecture and design. The system should be designed with a
focus on modularity, flexibility, and extensibility, which will enable it to adapt to changing needs
and requirements over time. This means that the system should be designed with a modular
architecture that allows for easy integration of new features and functionality as needed.

Moreover, the system should be designed with a focus on performance and scalability. This
means that the system should be designed to handle a large volume of data and users, and should
be able to scale up or down as needed to meet changing demands. The system should also be
designed with performance optimization in mind, including efficient data storage and retrieval,
and caching mechanisms to improve response times.

27
Student grading system

In addition, the system should be designed with a focus on interoperability. This means that the
system should be designed to work seamlessly with other educational systems and processes,
such as student information systems and learning management systems. This will help ensure
that the system is aligned with the needs of the educational institution and that it can be easily
integrated into the existing technology infrastructure.

Finally, the system should be designed with a focus on testing and quality assurance. This means
that the system should be thoroughly tested and debugged to ensure that it is functioning
properly and free from errors. This will involve testing the system with a group of representative
users and gathering feedback, as well as conducting regular maintenance and updates to ensure
that the system remains up-to-date and effective.

Overall, by considering the technical feasibility of the student grading system, it is possible to
develop a system that is effective, efficient, and sustainable in the long term. This can help to
promote student learning and achievement, support teacher and administrator decision-making,
and ensure that the educational institution is meeting its goals and objectives.

1.8.3. Economic Feasibility

Economic Feasibility for Student Grading System:

 Economic feasibility is an important factor to consider when developing a student

grading system. Here are some points to consider:
 Cost of development: The cost of developing the student grading system should be
considered, including the cost of hardware, software, and personnel.
 Cost of implementation: The cost of implementing the student grading system should be
considered, including the cost of training, support, and maintenance.
 Return on investment: The return on investment for the student grading system should be
considered, including the potential benefits to students, teachers, parents, and educational
institutions.
 Cost savings: The student grading system may result in cost savings for educational
institutions by reducing the need for paper-based grading and reporting systems.
 Revenue generation: The student grading system may generate revenue for educational
institutions by providing value-added services such as analytics and reporting.
 Cost-benefit analysis: A cost-benefit analysis should be conducted to determine the
economic feasibility of the student grading system. This analysis should consider the
costs and benefits of the system over its expected lifespan.

Overall, the economic feasibility of the student grading system is essential to ensure that the
system is cost-effective and provides a good return on investment. By considering these factors,
it is possible to develop a student grading system that meets the needs of all stakeholders and

28
Student grading system

provides a fair and effective means of evaluating student performance while being economically
feasible for educational institutions.

In addition to the economic feasibility of the student grading system, it is also important to
consider the ethical implications of such a system. For instance, there may be concerns about the
potential biases and discrimination that could arise from automated grading systems. Therefore,
it is important to ensure that the grading system is fair and unbiased, and that it does not
perpetuate or exacerbate existing inequalities in the education system.

Another factor to consider is the privacy and security of student data. The student grading system
will likely collect and store sensitive information about students, such as their grades and
performance data. It is important to ensure that the system is designed with appropriate data
privacy and security measures in place, such as encryption and access controls, to protect
students' personal information from unauthorized access or disclosure.

Ensuring that the grading system is fair and unbiased is a critical aspect of developing a student
grading system. Here are some steps that can be taken to help achieve this goal:

1. Develop clear and objective grading criteria: Clear and objective grading criteria should be
established for each assignment, test, or project. This can help ensure that all students are
evaluated consistently and fairly.

2. Train teachers and graders to recognize and avoid bias: Teachers and graders should receive
training on recognizing and avoiding bias in grading. This can include training on unconscious
biases, stereotypes, and cultural differences that may affect grading.

3. Use multiple graders: Using multiple graders to evaluate student work can help reduce the
impact of individual grader biases. By having multiple graders evaluate the same work, it is
possible to identify and correct any discrepancies in grading.

4. Use blind grading: Blind grading involves hiding the identity of the student from the grader
during the grading process. This can help reduce the impact of biases related to a student's race,
gender, or other personal characteristics.

5. Regularly review and analyze grading data: Regularly reviewing and analyzing grading data
can help identify any patterns of bias or discrepancies in grading. This can help ensure that the
grading system is fair and unbiased, and can also help identify areas for improvement.

Overall, ensuring that the grading system is fair and unbiased requires ongoing effort and
attention. By establishing clear grading criteria, providing training on bias recognition and
avoidance, using multiple graders, incorporating blind grading, and regularly reviewing grading
data, it is possible to develop a fair and effective grading system that promotes equal
opportunities for all students.

29
Student grading system

Finally, it is important to involve stakeholders in the development and implementation of the

student grading system to ensure that their needs and concerns are taken into account. This
includes students, teachers, parents, and educational institutions. By involving these stakeholders
in the process, it is possible to develop a student grading system that is not only economically
feasible but also meets the needs of all stakeholders and promotes a fair and effective means of
evaluating student performance.

1.8.4. Schedule Feasibility

Schedule feasibility is an important factor to consider when developing a student grading system.
Here are some points to consider:

 Project timeline: The project timeline should be realistic and achievable, taking into
account the time required for each phase of the project, including planning, development,
testing, and implementation.
 Resource availability: The availability of resources, including personnel, funding, and
technology, should be considered when developing the project timeline.
 Dependencies: Dependencies between different phases of the project should be identified
and accounted for in the project timeline.
 Risk management: Risks associated with the project timeline should be identified and
managed to ensure that the project stays on schedule.
 Milestones: Milestones should be identified and used to track progress and ensure that the
project stays on schedule.
 Contingency plan: A contingency plan should be developed to address any delays or
issues that may arise during the project timeline.

In addition to the factors mentioned, it is also important to consider the impact of the student
grading system on the workload of teachers and other educational personnel. Implementing a
new grading system can be time-consuming and may require additional resources such as
training and support. Therefore, it is important to ensure that the schedule feasibility of the
grading system takes into account the availability and capacity of teachers and other personnel.

Moreover, it is crucial to involve teachers and other stakeholders in the development and
implementation of the grading system. They can provide valuable insights into the practical
aspects of the grading system and help identify potential issues and challenges that may affect
the schedule feasibility of the project.

Finally, it is important to have a clear and effective communication plan in place to ensure that
all stakeholders are aware of the project timeline and any changes or updates that may affect the
schedule. This can help ensure that everyone is working towards the same goals and can help
prevent delays or miscommunications that may impact the schedule feasibility of the grading
system.

30
Student grading system

By considering the impact on workload, involving stakeholders, and having effective

communication, it is possible to develop a student grading system that is both schedule feasible
and meets the needs of all stakeholders.

Overall, the schedule feasibility of the student grading system is essential to ensure that the
project is completed on time and within budget. By considering these factors, it is possible to
develop a student grading system that meets the needs of all stakeholders and provides a fair and
effective means of evaluating student performance while being completed on schedule.

1.8.5. Legal Feasibility

The legal feasibility of a student grading system in Ethiopia is an important factor to consider
when developing such a system. Here are some points to consider:

 Compliance with regulations: The student grading system should comply with the
regulations and laws of Ethiopia related to education, data privacy, and other relevant
areas.
 Protection of student data: The student grading system should protect sensitive student
data from unauthorized access or breaches. This includes complying with data privacy
laws and regulations in Ethiopia.
 Fairness and transparency: The student grading system should be fair and transparent,
providing a clear understanding of how student performance is evaluated and graded.
 Accessibility: The student grading system should be accessible to all students, including
those with disabilities, in compliance with Ethiopian laws and regulations related to
accessibility.
 Intellectual property: The student grading system should comply with Ethiopian laws
and regulations related to intellectual property, including copyright and trademark laws.
 Liability: The student grading system should comply with Ethiopian laws and
regulations related to liability, including those related to negligence and data breaches.

Additionally, it is important to consider the ethical implications of the student grading system in
Ethiopia. For example, the grading system should not perpetuate or exacerbate existing
inequalities in the education system based on factors such as gender, ethnicity, or socioeconomic
status. It should also avoid any discriminatory practices or biases that may adversely affect
certain groups of students.

Moreover, it is important to ensure that the student grading system aligns with the cultural and
social values of Ethiopia. This may include considering the different grading systems used in
different regions or communities within Ethiopia and incorporating cultural norms and values
into the grading system.

Furthermore, it is crucial to involve relevant stakeholders, such as parents, teachers, and

educational institutions, in the development and implementation of the grading system to ensure
31
Student grading system

that their concerns and needs are taken into account. This can help ensure that the grading system
is both legally and ethically feasible in Ethiopia.

By considering the ethical implications of the grading system, aligning it with cultural and social
values, involving stakeholders and ensuring compliance with relevant laws and regulations, it is
possible to develop a student grading system that is both legally and ethically feasible in
Ethiopia.

Overall, the legal feasibility of the student grading system in Ethiopia is essential to ensure that
the system is compliant with relevant laws and regulations and protects sensitive student data. By
considering these factors, it is possible to develop a student grading system that meets the needs
of all stakeholders while being legally feasible in Ethiopia.

1.9. Risk Assessment

Risk assessment is an essential part of developing a student grading system. It involves
identifying potential risks and evaluating their likelihood and impact on the system. Here are
some deep insights into risk assessment in student grading systems:

 Risk identification: The first step in risk assessment is identifying potential risks that
could affect the student grading system. This includes risks related to data privacy,
security, reliability, and accessibility.
 Risk analysis: Once potential risks have been identified, the next step is to analyze and
evaluate each risk to determine its likelihood and impact on the system. This involves
assessing the severity of the risk and the likelihood of it occurring.
 Risk evaluation: After analyzing each risk, the next step is to evaluate the overall risk to
the student grading system. This involves determining the level of risk and deciding
whether the risk is acceptable or whether it needs to be mitigated.
 Mitigation strategies: If a risk is deemed unacceptable, the next step is to develop
mitigation strategies to reduce the likelihood and impact of the risk. This may involve
implementing additional security measures, developing contingency plans, or providing
additional training to stakeholders.
 Risk monitoring: Once mitigation strategies have been implemented, the final step is to
monitor the system for potential risks and evaluate the effectiveness of the mitigation
strategies. This involves ongoing monitoring and evaluation to ensure that the system
remains secure, reliable, and accessible.

Moreover, it is important to involve relevant stakeholders, such as teachers, students, parents,

and educational institutions, in the risk assessment process. This can help identify potential risks
that may not have been considered and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the risks
that need to be addressed.

32
 Student grading system

Furthermore, it is crucial to ensure that the risk assessment process is ongoing and includes
regular audits and reviews of the system. This can help identify new risks that may arise and
ensure that the mitigation strategies remain effective over time.

Additionally, it is important to consider the potential impact of external factors, such as changes
in technology, laws, or regulations, on the student grading system. These external factors can
introduce new risks or change the level of existing risks, making it important to regularly assess
and update the risk assessment process.

By involving stakeholders, ensuring ongoing risk assessment and monitoring, and considering
external factors, it is possible to develop a student grading system that is secure, reliable, and
effective while proactively addressing potential risks.

Overall, risk assessment is an essential part of developing a student grading system that is secure,
reliable, and effective. By identifying potential risks and developing mitigation strategies, it is
possible to minimize the impact of risks and ensure that the system meets the needs of all
stakeholders.

1.10. Work Breakdown

Work breakdown structure (WBS) is a method used in software development to divide a large
and complex project into smaller, manageable and independent tasks. It is a hierarchical
decomposition of the work to be executed by the project team to accomplish the project. The
WBS includes dividing the project into major activities and sub-activities, and recursively
decomposing each node into smaller sub-activities until the activities become undividable and
independent. The lowest level tasks are the most simple and independent tasks and take less than
two weeks worth of work. The WBS is constructed using a top-down approach, and each node is
decomposed into smaller sub-activities until simple and independent activities are created. The
WBS is used to provide a clear understanding of how student performance is evaluated and
graded, and it helps to organize the work to provide value and work towards producing tangible
results. The WBS is input to all critical processes of project management, and it should be
applicable to different aspects of a project. The WBS can help project managers communicate
information regarding a project, and it can help them manage complicated projects. There are
many examples, templates, and software tools available to help create a WBS for a student
grading system. The WBS should comply with the regulations and laws of Ethiopia related to
education, data privacy, and other relevant areas. The WBS should protect sensitive student data
from unauthorized access or breaches, and it should be fair and transparent.

1.10.1. Project plan Activities (Schedule)

1. Requirements gathering and analysis (1 week)

 Meet with stakeholders to determine requirements

33
 Student grading system

 Analyze existing grading systems used in Ethiopian schools

2. System design and architecture (2 weeks)

 Develop a high-level system design

 Determine the architecture and technologies to be used

3. Database design and development (2 weeks)

 Design the database schema

 Develop the database using appropriate tools

4. User interface design and development (3 weeks)

 Design the user interface for the grading system

 Develop the user interface using appropriate tools

5. Business logic development (4 weeks)

 Develop the business logic for the grading system

 Test and debug the business logic

6. Integration and testing (2 weeks)

 Integrate the different components of the grading system

 Test the system and fix any issues

7. Deployment and training (1 week)

 Deploy the grading system in Ethiopian schools

 Train teachers and administrators on how to use the system

8. Maintenance and support (ongoing)

 Provide ongoing maintenance and support for the grading system

 Address any issues that arise and make improvements as needed.

In addition to the points mentioned, it is important to ensure that the WBS for a student grading
system is flexible and adaptable to changes. As the project progresses, changes may need to be
made to the WBS to account for unforeseen circumstances or changing requirements.

Furthermore, the WBS should be developed with input from all relevant stakeholders, including
teachers, students, parents, and educational institutions. This can help ensure that the WBS
reflects the needs and requirements of all stakeholders and can help increase buy-in and support
for the grading system.

34
Student grading system

Moreover, it is important to establish clear accountability and responsibility for each task in the
WBS. This can help ensure that each task is completed on time and to the required standard, and
can help prevent delays or miscommunications that may impact the project schedule.

Finally, it is important to regularly review and update the WBS to ensure that it remains relevant
and effective. This can help identify any gaps or areas that require additional attention and can
also help ensure that the project remains on schedule.

By ensuring that the WBS is flexible, developed with input from stakeholders, establishes clear
accountability and responsibility, and is regularly reviewed and updated, it is possible to develop
a student grading system that is efficient, effective, and meets the needs of all stakeholders.

1.10.2. Project Organization

Project Organization for Student Grading System:

The project organization for a student grading system should be carefully planned to ensure that
the project is completed on time, within budget, and meets the needs of all stakeholders. Here are
some key roles and responsibilities to consider:

 Project Sponsor: The project sponsor is responsible for providing financial resources for
the project and proposing a business case. They establish the project vision and set the
project governance guidelines. The project sponsor is also responsible for the project's
return on investment and the impact it has on the organization
 Project Manager: The project manager is responsible for overseeing the daily project
activities and ensuring that the project is completed on time, within budget, and meets the
project objectives. They develop the project plan, manage the project team, and
communicate with stakeholders
 Development Team: The development team is responsible for developing the software
for the student grading system and testing it to ensure that it is functioning properly and
free from errors
 Database Management Team: The database management team is responsible for
developing a database management system to store and retrieve student data
 Training and Support Team: The training and support team is responsible for training
teachers, students, and administrators on how to use the student grading system. They
also provide ongoing support and maintenance for the system

In addition to the key roles and responsibilities mentioned, it is important to consider the need
for a project steering committee or advisory board. This committee can provide strategic
guidance and oversight for the project, and can help ensure that the project is aligned with the
overall goals and objectives of the educational institution or organization.

35
Student grading system

Furthermore, it is important to ensure that the project team members have the necessary skills
and expertise to perform their roles effectively. This may require additional training or hiring of
new team members with specific skills or expertise.

Moreover, it is important to establish clear communication channels and protocols among the
project team members and stakeholders. This can help ensure that everyone is informed about
the project status and any changes or updates that may affect the project.

Additionally, it is important to consider the need for a change management plan. The student
grading system may require changes or updates during the project lifecycle, and it is important to
have a process in place to manage these changes effectively.

Finally, it is important to establish a project review and evaluation process to ensure that the
project is meeting its goals and objectives. This can help identify areas for improvement and can
also provide useful insights for future projects.

By considering the need for a project steering committee, ensuring that project team members
have the necessary skills and expertise, establishing clear communication channels,
implementing a change management plan, and establishing a project review and evaluation
process, it is possible to develop an effective project organization for the student grading system
in Ethiopia.

Overall, the project organization for the student grading system should be carefully planned and
executed to ensure that the system meets the needs of all stakeholders and complies with legal
and regulatory requirements. By assigning clear roles and responsibilities, it is possible to
develop a student grading system that is effective, efficient, and aligned with the needs of the
educational institutions in Ethiopia.

1.10.3. Team Organization (Composition and Communication plan)

Team Organization (Composition and Communication Plan) for Student Grading System:

The team organization for a student grading system should be carefully planned to ensure that
the project is completed on time, within budget, and meets the needs of all stakeholders. Here are
some key considerations for team composition and communication plan:

 Project Sponsor: The project sponsor is responsible for providing financial resources for
the project and proposing a business case. They establish the project vision and set the
project governance guidelines. The project sponsor is also responsible for the project's
return on investment and the impact it has on the organization. The project sponsor
should communicate regularly with the project manager to ensure that the project is on
track and meeting the project objectives
 Project Manager: The project manager is responsible for overseeing the daily project
activities and ensuring that the project is completed on time, within budget, and meets the
36
Student grading system

project objectives. They develop the project plan, manage the project team, and
communicate with stakeholders. The project manager should communicate regularly with
the project sponsor and provide regular updates on the project status.
 Development Team: The development team is responsible for developing the software
for the student grading system and testing it to ensure that it is functioning properly and
free from errors. The development team should communicate regularly with the project
manager and provide regular updates on the development progress

 Database Management Team: The database management team is responsible for

developing a database management system to store and retrieve student data. The
database management team should communicate regularly with the development team
and provide regular updates on the database management progress
 Training and Support Team: The training and support team is responsible for training
teachers, students, and administrators on how to use the student grading system. They
also provide ongoing support and maintenance for the system. The training and support
team should communicate regularly with the project manager and provide regular updates
on the training and support progress

Overall, the team organization for the student grading system should be carefully planned and
executed to ensure that the system meets the needs of all stakeholders and complies with legal
and regulatory requirements. By assigning clear roles and responsibilities and establishing
effective communication channels, it is possible to develop a student grading system that is
effective, efficient, and aligned with the needs of the educational institutions in Ethiopia.

1.11. Budget
Sample Budget for Student Grading System:

Developing a student grading system requires financial resources to cover the costs of hardware,
software, personnel, and other expenses. Here is a sample budget for a student grading system in
Ethiopia:

Hardware and Software:

Computer hardware: $10,000

Software development tools: $5,000

Database management software: $3,000

Web hosting and domain registration: $1,000

37
Student grading system

Personnel:

Project manager: $60,000

Development team: $150,000

Database management team: $50,000

Training and support team: $30,000

Other Expenses:

Training materials and supplies: $5,000

Travel and accommodation expenses: $10,000

Contingency fund: $20,000

Total Budget: $344,000

It is important to note that this is just a sample budget and the actual costs may vary depending
on the specific requirements of the student grading system. The budget should be carefully
planned and monitored to ensure that the project is completed within budget and meets the needs
of all stakeholders. By allocating financial resources appropriately, it is possible to develop a
student grading system that is effective, efficient, and aligned with the needs of the educational
institutions in Ethiopia.

----------Chapter 2----------
2.1 Description of the Current System of student grading system

The current system of student grading in Ethiopia follows a standardized approach. Students are
evaluated based on their academic performance throughout the academic year. Grading is
typically done on a scale of 0 to 100, with 100 being the highest score achievable.

In most schools, a variety of assessments are used to determine a student's grade. These
assessments include regular class tests, quizzes, homework assignments, and midterm and final
exams. The weightage of each assessment may vary depending on the subject and grade level.

38
Student grading system

The grading scale is typically divided into different ranges, with corresponding letter grades
assigned to each range. For example, scores between 90-100 might be assigned an "A," 80-89 a
"B," 70-79 a "C," and so on. Some schools may also use a numerical grading system, where
specific numerical values are assigned to each letter grade range.

Teachers play a crucial role in assigning grades based on their evaluation of each student's
performance. They assess the students' understanding of the subject matter, their ability to apply
concepts, and their overall engagement in the learning process.

Grades are communicated to students and parents through report cards or progress reports at the
end of each grading period. These reports provide a comprehensive overview of the student's
performance in each subject, including their grades, attendance, and any additional remarks or
comments from teachers.

It is important to note that the grading system in Ethiopia may vary slightly from one educational
institution to another, but the overall objective remains the same - to assess and evaluate
students' academic progress and achievement.

2.2 Players/Actors in the Existing System

The existing system of student grading in Ethiopia involves several key players or actors. These
include:

1. Students: Students are the primary participants in the grading system. They are
responsible for actively participating in the learning process, completing assignments,
and preparing for assessments to earn their grades.
2. Teachers: Teachers play a significant role in the grading system. They design and
administer assessments, evaluate students' performance, and assign grades based on their
understanding of the subject matter and assessment criteria.
3. School Administrators: School administrators oversee the implementation of the grading
system within the institution. They ensure that grading policies and procedures are
followed, provide guidance to teachers, and address any issues related to grading.
4. Ministry of Education: The Ministry of Education sets the guidelines and regulations for
the overall education system in Ethiopia, including the grading system. They establish the
framework and standards that schools should adhere to when evaluating and grading
students.
5. Parents/Guardians: Parents or guardians are important stakeholders in the grading system.
They support their children's education, monitor their progress, and communicate with
teachers to understand their child's performance.
6. Examination Boards: Examination boards are responsible for developing and
administering standardized exams at the national level. These exams, such as the

39
Student grading system

Ethiopian National Examinations, play a significant role in assessing students' knowledge

and determining their eligibility for further education.
7. Education Inspectors: Education inspectors ensure the quality and effectiveness of the
grading system. They visit schools, review grading practices, and provide feedback to
teachers and administrators to improve the overall educational experience.

These actors collectively contribute to the functioning of the existing grading system in Ethiopia,
aiming to assess and promote students' academic growth and achievement.

2.3 Use case Diagram for Existing System

Here is a textual representation of the use case diagram:

1. Actors:
o Student
o Teacher
o School Administrator
o Ministry of Education
o Parent/Guardian
o Examination Board
o Education Inspector
2. Use Cases:
o Student submits assignments
o Teacher creates assessments
o Teacher evaluates student performance
o Teacher assigns grades
o School Administrator manages grading policies
o Ministry of Education sets grading standards
o Parent/Guardian monitors student progress
o Examination Board conducts standardized exams
o Education Inspector evaluates grading practices
3. Relationships:
o Students interact with multiple use cases such as submitting assignments and
receiving grades.
o Teachers interact with use cases like creating assessments, evaluating
performance, and assigning grades.
o School Administrators manage grading policies and ensure their implementation.
o The Ministry of Education sets grading standards and guidelines.
o Parents/Guardians monitor student progress and communicate with teachers.
o Examination Boards conduct standardized exams to assess student knowledge.
o Education Inspectors evaluate grading practices and provide feedback for
improvement.

Please note that this is a textual representation of the use case diagram, and it is recommended to
create a visual representation for better understanding and communication of the system
components and relationships.

40
Student grading system

2.4 Report Generation in Existing System

In the existing student grading system in Ethiopia, report generation is an essential component. It
involves the creation of reports that provide a comprehensive overview of a student's academic
performance. Here is an outline of the report generation process:

1. Assessment Data Collection: Teachers collect assessment data throughout the academic
year. This includes test scores, quiz results, homework grades, and any other relevant
performance indicators.
2. Data Compilation: The collected assessment data is compiled and organized for each
student. This may involve entering the data into a digital system or maintaining physical
records.
3. Calculation of Grades: Based on the assessment data, teachers calculate the grades for
each student. This may involve applying specific grading criteria, considering weightage
of different assessments, and using the established grading scale.
4. Report Preparation: Once the grades are calculated, teachers prepare individual student
reports. These reports typically include the student's name, grade level, subjects, and
respective grades. They may also include attendance records, behavior comments, and
additional remarks.
5. Review and Verification: The prepared reports are reviewed by teachers to ensure
accuracy and completeness. They verify that the grades are correctly calculated and that
all necessary information is included.
6. Distribution to Students and Parents: The finalized reports are distributed to students and
parents/guardians. This may be done through physical copies handed out during parent-
teacher meetings or through a digital system where reports can be accessed and
downloaded.
7. Parent-Teacher Communication: After receiving the reports, parents/guardians have the
opportunity to discuss their child's academic progress with the teachers. They can seek
clarification, address concerns, and collaborate on strategies for improvement.

The report generation process may vary slightly depending on the school and the systems in
place. However, the overall objective is to provide a clear and comprehensive assessment of a
student's academic performance, enabling students, parents, and teachers to track progress and
identify areas for growth.

2.5 Form and Document used in the Existing System

41
Student grading system

In the existing student grading system in Ethiopia, various forms and documents are used to
facilitate the assessment, record-keeping, and reporting processes. Here are some commonly
used forms and documents:

1. Assessment Sheets: Teachers use assessment sheets to record individual student scores
for different assessments such as tests, quizzes, and assignments. These sheets typically
include the student's name, subject, date of assessment, and space to record the score or
grade achieved.
2. Gradebooks: Gradebooks are used to maintain a comprehensive record of each student's
grades throughout the academic year. They include columns for different assessments,
allowing teachers to input the scores or grades achieved by each student.
3. Report Cards: Report cards are official documents that provide a summary of a student's
academic performance for a given period, typically at the end of a grading period or
academic year. Report cards include the student's name, grade level, subjects, and
respective grades. They may also include attendance records, behavior comments, and
additional remarks.
4. Progress Reports: Progress reports are similar to report cards but are issued at regular
intervals throughout the academic year. They provide an update on a student's progress,
highlighting strengths, areas for improvement, and any specific comments or
recommendations from teachers.
5. Transcripts: Transcripts are comprehensive records of a student's academic achievements
over multiple years. They include a cumulative summary of grades and credits earned in
different subjects and may also include information about extracurricular activities,
awards, and honors.
6. Parent-Teacher Meeting Forms: These forms are used to schedule and document
discussions between parents/guardians and teachers during parent-teacher meetings. They
typically include details such as the date and time of the meeting, topics to be discussed,
and any specific concerns or questions raised by the parent/guardian.
7. Grading Policy Documents: Grading policy documents outline the guidelines and criteria
used to assess and assign grades to students. They provide clarity on the grading scale,
weightage of different assessments, and any specific policies or procedures followed by
the school.

These forms and documents play a crucial role in maintaining accurate records, facilitating
effective communication between stakeholders, and ensuring transparency in the grading and
reporting processes within the existing student grading system in Ethiopia.

2.6 Business Rule for Existing System

In the existing student grading system in Ethiopia, several business rules govern the operations
and processes. These rules help ensure consistency, fairness, and accuracy in grading and
assessment. Here are some common business rules:

42
Student grading system

1. Grading Scale: A predefined grading scale is used to assign letter grades or numerical
values based on the percentage or score achieved by a student in assessments. This scale
establishes the criteria for differentiating performance levels, such as A, B, C, or
numerical ranges like 90-100, 80-89, etc.
2. Weightage of Assessments: Different assessments, such as tests, quizzes, assignments,
and exams, may carry different weightage in determining a student's overall grade. The
weightage assigned to each assessment is predefined and communicated to students and
teachers.
3. Minimum Passing Grade: There is a minimum passing grade that students must achieve
to progress to the next grade level or to successfully complete a course. This grade is
typically set by the school or educational institution and may vary depending on the level
of education.
4. Assessment Integrity: Assessments must be conducted with integrity and fairness.
Students are expected to complete assessments independently, without any form of
cheating or plagiarism. Teachers are responsible for ensuring the validity and security of
assessments.
5. Timely Submission of Assignments: Students are required to submit assignments within
specified deadlines. Late submissions may result in penalties or reduced grades, as
defined by the school's policy.
6. Consistency in Grading: Teachers are expected to apply consistent grading standards and
criteria across all students, ensuring fairness and equity. This includes using the same
rubrics, assessment guidelines, and grading criteria for similar assignments or exams.
7. Feedback and Review: Teachers should provide constructive feedback to students on
their performance. Students have the right to review their graded assessments and seek
clarifications or request re-evaluation if they believe there are errors or discrepancies.
8. Record Keeping: Accurate and up-to-date records of student grades, assessments, and
attendance must be maintained by teachers and school administrators. These records
serve as a reference for report generation, academic progress tracking, and future
evaluations.

These business rules help maintain consistency, transparency, and fairness within the existing
student grading system in Ethiopia, ensuring that students are assessed and graded fairly and
accurately.

2.7 Proposed System

1. Online Grading Platform: Implement an online grading platform that allows teachers to
input and manage student grades electronically. This platform should be accessible to
both teachers and students, providing a centralized system for grading.
2. Standardized Grading Criteria: Develop standardized grading criteria and rubrics for each
subject and grade level. These criteria should be aligned with the national curriculum and
clearly communicate the expectations for each grade.
3. Continuous Assessment: Emphasize continuous assessment throughout the academic
year, including regular quizzes, tests, projects, and assignments. This approach provides a

43
Student grading system

more comprehensive evaluation of student performance and reduces the reliance on a

single high-stakes exam.
4. Automated Grade Calculation: Automate the grade calculation process within the online
grading platform. This ensures accuracy and consistency in calculating grades based on
the predefined grading criteria and weightage of assessments.
5. Student and Parent Portals: Create student and parent portals within the online grading
platform, allowing them to access real-time updates on grades, attendance, and
assignment submissions. This promotes transparency and enables students and parents to
track progress and identify areas for improvement.
6. Teacher Collaboration and Moderation: Facilitate teacher collaboration and moderation
to ensure consistency in grading across different classes and sections. Regular meetings
and discussions can help align grading practices, address concerns, and maintain fairness.
7. Data Analysis and Reporting: Utilize data analysis tools within the grading platform to
generate comprehensive reports on student performance, class averages, and trends.
These reports can provide insights for teachers, school administrators, and the Ministry of
Education to identify areas of improvement and make data-driven decisions.
8. Training and Support: Provide training and support to teachers on using the online
grading platform effectively, implementing standardized grading criteria, and utilizing
data analysis tools. This ensures that teachers are equipped with the necessary skills and
knowledge to implement the proposed system.

It is important to note that the implementation of a new system requires careful planning,
stakeholder involvement, and consideration of technical infrastructure and resources. The
proposed system aims to enhance efficiency, accuracy, transparency, and fairness in the student
grading process, ultimately supporting improved educational outcomes.

2.7.1 Overview of the New System

The proposed new system for student grading in Ethiopia aims to modernize and streamline the
existing process, leveraging technology and standardized practices. Here is an overview of the
new system:

1. Online Grading Platform: Implement a user-friendly, web-based grading platform

accessible to teachers, students, and parents. This platform serves as a centralized hub for
recording, managing, and accessing student grades and assessment data.
2. Standardized Grading Criteria: Develop and implement standardized grading criteria
aligned with the national curriculum. These criteria clearly define the expectations for
each grade level and subject, ensuring consistency in assessment and grading practices
across schools.
3. Continuous Assessment: Emphasize continuous assessment throughout the academic
year, including regular quizzes, projects, presentations, and assignments. This approach

44
Student grading system

provides a more comprehensive evaluation of student performance and reduces the

reliance on a single high-stakes exam.
4. Automated Grade Calculation: Automate the grade calculation process within the online
grading platform. The system will calculate grades based on the predefined grading
criteria and weightage of assessments, eliminating manual calculations and ensuring
accuracy and consistency.
5. Student and Parent Portals: Provide dedicated portals within the online grading platform
for students and parents. These portals enable real-time access to grades, attendance
records, assignment submissions, and teacher feedback. Students and parents can track
progress, identify areas for improvement, and communicate with teachers.
6. Data Analysis and Reporting: Utilize data analysis tools within the grading platform to
generate comprehensive reports on student performance, class averages, and trends.
These reports provide valuable insights for teachers, school administrators, and the
Ministry of Education to monitor progress, identify areas of improvement, and make
data-driven decisions.
7. Teacher Collaboration and Professional Development: Foster collaboration among
teachers through the online grading platform. Teachers can share best practices, discuss
grading challenges, and engage in professional development activities to enhance their
grading skills and ensure consistency.
8. Training and Support: Provide comprehensive training and ongoing support to teachers,
students, and parents on using the online grading platform effectively. This includes
training sessions, user manuals, and a helpdesk to address any technical or operational
issues.

The new system aims to enhance efficiency, accuracy, transparency, and fairness in the student
grading process. It promotes standardized practices, provides real-time access to grades and
feedback, and empowers stakeholders with data-driven insights for improved educational
outcomes.

2.7.2 Functional Requirements of the New System

The functional requirements of the proposed new system for student grading in Ethiopia include
the following:

1. User Registration and Authentication: The system should allow teachers, students, and
parents to register and create user accounts. It should also provide secure authentication
mechanisms to ensure authorized access to the grading platform.
2. Grade Input and Management: Teachers should be able to input and manage student
grades for various assessments. The system should support the ability to assign grades
based on the predefined grading criteria, weightage of assessments, and subject-specific
requirements.

45
Student grading system

3. Grade Calculation and Aggregation: The system should automatically calculate grades
based on the inputted assessment scores and predefined grading criteria. It should also
aggregate the grades to calculate overall subject grades and cumulative grades for each
student.
4. Standardized Grading Criteria: The system should incorporate standardized grading
criteria aligned with the national curriculum. This includes defining grade ranges or letter
grades corresponding to specific score ranges or performance levels.
5. Continuous Assessment Tracking: The system should enable teachers to track and
manage continuous assessments throughout the academic year. This includes recording
scores for quizzes, tests, projects, assignments, and other assessments.
6. Student and Parent Portals: The system should provide dedicated portals for students and
parents to access grades, attendance records, assignment submissions, and teacher
feedback. They should be able to view individual student progress and receive timely
updates.
7. Reporting and Analytics: The system should generate comprehensive reports on student
performance, class averages, and trends. It should provide data analytics capabilities to
identify areas of improvement, monitor student progress, and support data-driven
decision-making.
8. Communication and Collaboration: The system should facilitate communication and
collaboration between teachers, students, and parents. It should allow for messaging,
notifications, and the ability to schedule parent-teacher meetings or discussions.
9. Data Security and Privacy: The system should ensure the security and privacy of student
data. It should comply with relevant data protection regulations and implement
appropriate security measures to safeguard sensitive information.
10. System Administration: The system should have administrative capabilities to manage
user accounts, roles, and permissions. It should also support data backup, system
maintenance, and scalability to accommodate a growing user base.

These functional requirements aim to enhance the efficiency, accuracy, transparency, and
collaboration within the student grading process, ultimately supporting improved educational
outcomes and stakeholder satisfaction.

2.7.3 Non-Functional Requirements of the New System

In addition to the functional requirements, the proposed new system for student grading in
Ethiopia should also fulfill certain non-functional requirements. These requirements focus on the
system's performance, usability, security, and other qualities. Here are some non-functional
requirements to consider:

1. Performance: The system should be responsive and provide quick access to grades and
data, even during peak usage times. It should handle a large number of concurrent users
and maintain acceptable response times for data retrieval and calculations.

46
Student grading system

2. Usability: The system should have a user-friendly interface that is intuitive and easy to
navigate. It should require minimal training for teachers, students, and parents to
understand and use effectively. The system should also provide clear instructions and
feedback to guide users throughout the grading process.
3. Reliability: The system should be reliable and available for use at all times, with minimal
downtime or interruptions. It should have backup and recovery mechanisms in place to
ensure data integrity and minimize the risk of data loss.
4. Security: The system should implement robust security measures to protect student data
and maintain confidentiality. It should have authentication mechanisms to ensure
authorized access and encryption protocols to secure data transmission. Additionally, the
system should adhere to relevant data protection and privacy regulations.
5. Scalability: The system should be scalable to accommodate a growing user base and
increasing data volumes. It should be able to handle additional schools, classes, and
students without significant performance degradation.
6. Integration: The system should have the capability to integrate with other educational
systems or platforms, such as student information systems or learning management
systems. This integration enables seamless data exchange and reduces duplication of
effort.
7. Accessibility: The system should be accessible to users with disabilities, complying with
accessibility standards and guidelines. It should support features like screen readers,
keyboard navigation, and alternative text for visual elements to ensure inclusivity.
8. Maintainability: The system should be designed and developed using modular and
maintainable code practices. This allows for easier system updates, bug fixes, and
enhancements in the future.
9. Support and Training: The system should provide adequate support channels, such as
helpdesk or online documentation, to assist users in case of inquiries or issues. It should
also offer training resources to ensure users can effectively utilize the system's features.

By addressing these non-functional requirements, the new system can provide a reliable, user-
friendly, secure, and scalable platform for student grading in Ethiopia.

2.7.4 Actor and Use case Identification

In the context of the proposed new system for student grading in Ethiopia, let's identify the actors
and corresponding use cases:

1. Actors:

 Teacher: The primary actor responsible for inputting and managing student grades,
conducting assessments, and providing feedback.
 Student: The primary actor who receives grades, tracks their academic progress, and
accesses feedback and assignment submissions.

47
Student grading system

 Parent/Guardian: An actor who monitors their child's grades, attendance, and

communicates with teachers regarding their child's academic performance.
 Administrator: An actor who manages user accounts, system settings, and oversees the
overall operation of the grading system.
 System: Represents the grading system itself, which facilitates the management,
calculation, and reporting of student grades.

2. Use Cases:

 Input Grades: Teachers input grades for various assessments, such as quizzes, tests,
assignments, and projects.
 Calculate Grades: The system automatically calculates overall grades based on the
predefined grading criteria and weightage of assessments.
 View Grades: Students and parents can view their respective grades and track their
academic progress.
 Access Attendance Records: Students and parents can access attendance records to
monitor attendance history.
 Submit Assignments: Students can submit assignments electronically through the system.
 Provide Feedback: Teachers can provide feedback on student performance and areas for
improvement.
 Generate Reports: The system generates comprehensive reports on student performance,
class averages, and trends.
 Schedule Parent-Teacher Meetings: Parents can schedule meetings with teachers to
discuss their child's academic progress.
 Manage User Accounts: Administrators manage user accounts, including creating,
modifying, or disabling accounts as needed.
 System Maintenance: Administrators perform system maintenance tasks such as backups,
updates, and system configuration.

These identified actors and use cases provide a foundation for understanding the interactions and
functionalities within the student grading system. Further analysis and refinement can be done to
capture additional details and ensure comprehensive coverage of the system's requirements.

2.7.5 Business Rule for the New System

One important business rule for the new system for student grading in Ethiopia could be:

1. Grade Submission Deadline: Teachers must submit student grades within a specified
deadline after the completion of an assessment.

This business rule ensures timely grading and provides students with prompt feedback on their
performance. It helps maintain consistency and fairness by ensuring that grades are submitted
within a reasonable timeframe, allowing students to track their progress and address any

48
Student grading system

concerns or questions they may have. Additionally, it enables the system to generate accurate
reports and calculate cumulative grades in a timely manner.

2.7.6 System Model

The system model for the proposed new student grading system in Ethiopia can be represented
using the Unified Modeling Language (UML) notation. Here is a simplified representation of the
system model:

1. Actors:

 Teacher
 Student
 Parent/Guardian
 Administrator

2. Use Cases:

 Input Grades
 Calculate Grades
 View Grades
 Access Attendance Records
 Submit Assignments
 Provide Feedback
 Generate Reports
 Schedule Parent-Teacher Meetings
 Manage User Accounts
 Perform System Maintenance

3. Relationships between Actors and Use Cases:

 Teacher: Responsible for Input Grades, Calculate Grades, Provide Feedback, Generate
Reports, Submit Assignments, and Access Attendance Records.
 Student: Can View Grades, Access Attendance Records, and Submit Assignments.
 Parent/Guardian: Can View Grades, Access Attendance Records, and Schedule Parent-
Teacher Meetings.
 Administrator: Manages User Accounts, Performs System Maintenance, and Generates
Reports.

4. System Components:

49
Student grading system

 Online Grading Platform: Represents the central system that facilitates the management,
calculation, and reporting of student grades. It includes functionalities for grade input,
grade calculation, report generation, and user account management.
 Grade Calculation Engine: A component within the system that automatically calculates
overall grades based on the predefined grading criteria and weightage of assessments.
 Reporting Module: A component that generates comprehensive reports on student
performance, class averages, and trends.
 User Management Module: A component responsible for managing user accounts,
including creation, modification, and disabling of accounts.
 Assignment Submission Module: A component that allows students to submit
assignments electronically.
 Feedback Module: A component that enables teachers to provide feedback on student
performance.
 Attendance Tracking Module: A component that records and tracks student attendance.

This system model provides a high-level overview of the components, actors, and their
interactions within the student grading system. It can be further elaborated and refined to capture
additional details and relationships based on the specific requirements and functionalities of the
system.

2.7.6.1 Use case Model:

Use Case Model:

1. Actors:

 Teacher
 Student
 Parent/Guardian
 Administrator

2. Use Cases:

 Input Grades
 Calculate Grades
 View Grades
 Access Attendance Records
 Submit Assignments
 Provide Feedback
 Generate Reports
 Schedule Parent-Teacher Meetings
 Manage User Accounts
 Perform System Maintenance

50
Student grading system

3. Use Case Descriptions:

Input Grades:

 Description: Teachers input grades for various assessments.

 Actors: Teacher
 Preconditions: Teacher is authenticated and has access to the grading system.
 Postconditions: Grades are saved and can be used for calculating overall grades.
 Flow of Events:
1. Teacher selects the desired assessment.
2. Teacher enters the grades for each student.
3. Teacher saves the grades.

Calculate Grades:

 Description: The system automatically calculates overall grades based on the predefined
grading criteria and weightage of assessments.
 Actors: Teacher, System
 Preconditions: Grades for assessments have been inputted.
 Postconditions: Overall grades are calculated and saved for each student.
 Flow of Events:
1. Teacher initiates the grade calculation process.
2. The system retrieves the inputted grades and applies the predefined grading
criteria and weightage.
3. The system calculates the overall grades.
4. The system saves the calculated grades.

View Grades:

 Description: Students and parents can view their respective grades.

 Actors: Student, Parent/Guardian
 Preconditions: Student or parent is authenticated and has access to the grading system.
 Postconditions: Grades are displayed to the student or parent.
 Flow of Events:
1. Student or parent logs into the grading system.
2. Student or parent selects the desired subject or assessment.
3. The system retrieves and displays the grades.

Access Attendance Records:

 Description: Students and parents can access attendance records.

 Actors: Student, Parent/Guardian
 Preconditions: Student or parent is authenticated and has access to the grading system.
 Postconditions: Attendance records are displayed to the student or parent.
 Flow of Events:
1. Student or parent logs into the grading system.

51
Student grading system

2. Student or parent selects the desired time period or subject.

3. The system retrieves and displays the attendance records.

Submit Assignments:

 Description: Students can submit assignments electronically.

 Actors: Student
 Preconditions: Student is authenticated and has access to the grading system.
 Postconditions: Assignments are submitted and saved.
 Flow of Events:
1. Student selects the desired assignment.
2. Student uploads the assignment file.
3. Student submits the assignment.

Provide Feedback:

 Description: Teachers can provide feedback on student performance.

 Actors: Teacher
 Preconditions: Teacher is authenticated and has access to the grading system.
 Postconditions: Feedback is saved and associated with the respective student.
 Flow of Events:
1. Teacher selects the desired student.
2. Teacher provides written or verbal feedback on the student's performance.
3. Teacher saves the feedback.

Generate Reports:

 Description: The system generates comprehensive reports on student performance, class

averages, and trends.
 Actors: Teacher, Administrator
 Preconditions: Data for generating reports is available.
 Postconditions: Reports are generated and can be accessed or downloaded.
 Flow of Events:
1. Teacher or administrator selects the desired report type or criteria.
2. The system retrieves the necessary data.
3. The system generates the report.
4. The report is displayed or downloaded.

Schedule Parent-Teacher Meetings:

 Description: Parents can schedule meetings with teachers to discuss their child's
academic progress.
 Actors: Parent/Guardian
 Preconditions: Parent is authenticated and has access to the grading system.
 Postconditions: Meeting is scheduled and confirmed.
 Flow of Events:

52
Student grading system

1. Parent selects the desired teacher.

2. Parent selects the preferred meeting date and time.
3. Parent submits the meeting request.
4. Teacher receives the request and confirms the meeting.

Manage User Accounts:

 Description: Administrators manage user accounts, including creation, modification, and

disabling of accounts.
 Actors: Administrator
 Preconditions: Administrator is authenticated and has administrative privileges.
 Postconditions: User accounts are created, modified, or disabled as needed.
 Flow of Events:
1. Administrator selects the desired user account.
2. Administrator performs the necessary actions, such as creating a new account,
modifying account details, or disabling an account.

Perform System Maintenance:

 Description: Administrators perform system maintenance tasks such as backups, updates,

and system configuration.
 Actors: Administrator
 Preconditions: Administrator is authenticated and has administrative privileges.
 Postconditions: System maintenance tasks are completed.
 Flow of Events:
1. Administrator initiates the system maintenance process.
2. Administrator performs the necessary tasks, such as data backups, software
updates, or system configuration changes.

This use case model provides a structured representation of the system's functionalities and
interactions with the actors. It serves as a foundation for understanding the system's requirements
and can be further expanded, refined, and detailed as needed.

2.7.6.1.1 Use Case Description

Here are detailed descriptions for a few of the use cases from the use case model:

1. Use Case: Input Grades

Description: Teachers input grades for various assessments such as quizzes, tests, assignments,
and projects.

Actors: Teacher

Preconditions: The teacher is authenticated and has access to the grading system.

53
Student grading system

Postconditions: Grades are saved and can be used for calculating overall grades.

Flow of Events:

1. The teacher selects the desired assessment from the system.

2. The system displays a list of students enrolled in the selected assessment.
3. The teacher enters the grades for each student.
4. The system validates the entered grades to ensure they are within the acceptable range.
5. The teacher saves the grades.
6. The system updates the grades for each student in the database.

Alternate Flow:

 If the entered grade is invalid or outside the acceptable range:

o The system displays an error message.
o The teacher corrects the grade and saves it again.

2. Use Case: View Grades

Description: Students and parents can view their respective grades.

Actors: Student, Parent/Guardian

Preconditions: The student or parent is authenticated and has access to the grading system.

Postconditions: Grades are displayed to the student or parent.

Flow of Events:

1. The student or parent logs into the grading system.

2. The system presents the student or parent with a dashboard or menu.
3. The student or parent selects the desired subject or assessment.
4. The system retrieves and displays the grades for the selected subject or assessment.
5. The student or parent can view the individual grades and overall grades for each
assessment.
6. Use Case: Submit Assignments

Description: Students can submit assignments electronically.

Actors: Student

Preconditions: The student is authenticated and has access to the grading system.

Postconditions: Assignments are submitted and saved.

Flow of Events:

54
Student grading system

1. The student selects the desired assignment from the system.

2. The system displays the assignment details and submission instructions.
3. The student prepares the assignment file according to the instructions.
4. The student uploads the assignment file.
5. The system validates the file format and size.
6. The student confirms the submission.
7. The system saves the submitted assignment and associates it with the student.

Alternate Flow:

 If the file format or size is invalid:

o The system displays an error message.
o The student corrects the file format or reduces the file size before confirming the
submission.

These use case descriptions provide a detailed sequence of events for each use case, including
the actions performed by the actors and the system's responses. They help to capture the specific
requirements and functionalities of the system and serve as a basis for further development and
implementation.

2.7.6.2 Sequence Diagram

actor Student
Student -> System: Log in
activate System
System -> Student: Display dashboard/menu
Student -> System: Select desired subject/assessment
System -> Student: Retrieve grades
Student -> System: Request to view grades

55
Student grading system

System -> Student: Display grades

deactivate System
@enduml

This sequence diagram shows the following steps:

1. The Student actor logs into the system.

2. The System activates and displays the dashboard or menu for the Student.
3. The Student selects the desired subject or assessment.
4. The System retrieves the grades for the selected subject or assessment.
5. The Student requests to view the grades.
6. The System displays the grades to the Student.
7. The System deactivates.

This sequence diagram represents the flow of events for the "View Grades" use case, illustrating
the interaction between the Student actor and the System. It provides a visual representation of
the steps involved in viewing grades and the communication between the actor and the system.

2.7.6.3 State chart Diagram

56
Student grading system

[*] --> LoggedOut

state LoggedOut {
[*] --> Idle
Idle --> LoggingIn : Login
LoggingIn --> LoggedIn : Valid credentials
LoggingIn --> InvalidCredentials : Invalid credentials
LoggedIn --> ViewingGrades : View grades
LoggedIn --> SubmittingAssignment : Submit assignment
LoggedIn --> LoggingOut : Logout
ViewingGrades --> LoggedIn : Go back
SubmittingAssignment --> LoggedIn : Cancel submission
LoggedOut --> Idle : Logout
InvalidCredentials --> Idle : Retry login
}

57
Student grading system

state LoggedIn {
...
}

state ViewingGrades {
...
}

state SubmittingAssignment {
...
}

state LoggingOut {
...
}

state InvalidCredentials {
...
}

In this state chart diagram, the "Student" actor transitions between different states based on their
actions and the system's responses. Here's a breakdown of the states and transitions:

 LoggedOut: The initial state when the student is not logged in.
o Idle: The default state when the student is logged out and waiting for an action.
o LoggingIn: The state when the student is entering their credentials to log in.
 LoggedIn: The state when the student successfully logs in.
 InvalidCredentials: The state when the student enters invalid credentials
during login.
o LoggingOut: The state when the student initiates the logout process.
o InvalidCredentials: The state when the student enters invalid credentials during
login.
 LoggedIn: The state when the student is logged into the system.
o ViewingGrades: The state when the student is viewing their grades.
o SubmittingAssignment: The state when the student is submitting an assignment.
o LoggingOut: The state when the student initiates the logout process.

The state chart diagram provides a visual representation of the different states and transitions for
the "Student" actor in the student grading system. It helps to understand the possible states the
student can be in and how they transition between these states based on their actions and the
system's responses.

2.7.6.4 Activity Diagram

58
Student grading system

start
:Teacher selects assessment;
:Teacher enters grades for each student;
while (More students?) is (yes)
:Teacher enters grades for next student;
endwhile (no)
:Teacher saves grades;
stop

In this activity diagram, the steps involved in the "Input Grades" use case are represented. Here's
a breakdown of the activities:

 start: The starting point of the activity diagram.

 Teacher selects assessment: The teacher selects the specific assessment for which they
want to input grades.

59
Student grading system

 Teacher enters grades for each student: The teacher enters the grades for each student,
one by one.
 while (More students?): Checks if there are more students for whom grades need to be
entered.
 Teacher enters grades for next student: If there are more students, the teacher enters the
grades for the next student.
 endwhile (no): If there are no more students, the loop ends.
 Teacher saves grades: The teacher saves the entered grades.
 stop: The end point of the activity diagram.

This activity diagram provides a visual representation of the steps involved in the "Input Grades"
use case for the teacher in the student grading system. It shows the flow of activities and
decisions within the use case, helping to understand the overall process and sequence of actions.

2.7.6.5 Class Diagram

class Student {

60
Student grading system

- id: int
- name: string
- grade: string
- attendance: int
+ viewGrades(): void
+ submitAssignment(): void
}

class Teacher {
- id: int
- name: string
+ inputGrades(): void
+ provideFeedback(): void
}

class Parent {
- id: int
- name: string
+ viewGrades(): void
+ scheduleMeeting(): void
}

class Administrator {
- id: int
- name: string
+ manageUserAccounts(): void
+ generateReports(): void
}

class GradingSystem {
- students: List<Student>
- teachers: List<Teacher>
- parents: List<Parent>
- administrators: List<Administrator>
+ addStudent(student: Student): void
+ addTeacher(teacher: Teacher): void
+ addParent(parent: Parent): void
+ addAdministrator(administrator: Administrator): void
}

Student --|> GradingSystem

Teacher --|> GradingSystem
Parent --|> GradingSystem
Administrator --|> GradingSystem

61
Student grading system

In this class diagram, the classes represent the different entities in the student grading system,
including Student, Teacher, Parent, Administrator, and GradingSystem. Here's a breakdown of
the classes and their attributes and operations:

 Student: Represents a student in the system.

o Attributes:
 id: An identifier for the student.
 name: The name of the student.
 grade: The grade or class the student is in.
 attendance: The attendance record of the student.
o Operations:
 viewGrades(): Allows the student to view their grades.
 submitAssignment(): Allows the student to submit assignments.
 Teacher: Represents a teacher in the system.
o Attributes:
 id: An identifier for the teacher.
 name: The name of the teacher.
o Operations:
 inputGrades(): Allows the teacher to input grades for assessments.
 provideFeedback(): Allows the teacher to provide feedback on student
performance.
 Parent: Represents a parent or guardian in the system.
o Attributes:
 id: An identifier for the parent.
 name: The name of the parent.
o Operations:
 viewGrades(): Allows the parent to view their child's grades.
 scheduleMeeting(): Allows the parent to schedule a meeting with the
teacher.
 Administrator: Represents an administrator in the system.
o Attributes:
 id: An identifier for the administrator.
 name: The name of the administrator.
o Operations:
 manageUserAccounts(): Allows the administrator to manage user
accounts.
 generateReports(): Allows the administrator to generate reports on student
performance.
 GradingSystem: Represents the overall grading system.
o Attributes:
 students: A list of all the students in the system.
 teachers: A list of all the teachers in the system.
 parents: A list of all the parents in the system.
 administrators: A list of all the administrators in the system.
o Operations:
 addStudent(student: Student): Adds a student to the system.

62
Student grading system

 addTeacher(teacher: Teacher): Adds a teacher to the system.

 addParent(parent: Parent): Adds a parent to the system.
 addAdministrator(administrator: Administrator): Adds an administrator to
the system.

The class diagram illustrates the relationships between the classes and their attributes and
operations, providing a high-level overview of the entities and their interactions in the student
grading system. It helps to understand the structure and organization of the system and serves as
a blueprint for implementing the system.

2.7.6.6 User Interface Prototyping

Here is an example of a user interface prototype for the student grading system. Please note that
this is a simplified representation and the actual design may vary based on specific requirements
and design preferences.

1. Login Page:

 The login page allows users to enter their credentials to access the system.
 It includes fields for username and password, along with a "Login" button.
 Additionally, there may be options for password recovery or creating a new account.

2. Dashboard:

 The dashboard serves as the main landing page after successful login.
 It provides an overview of important information, such as upcoming assignments, recent
grades, and attendance records.
 It may also include navigation menus or buttons to access different features and
functionalities.

3. Grades Page:

 The grades page displays the grades for the selected subject or assessment.
 It may include a table or list format, showing the student's name, assignment name, and
corresponding grade.
 There may be options to filter or sort the grades based on specific criteria.

4. Assignments Page:

 The assignments page lists the upcoming assignments or tasks.

 It provides details such as assignment name, due date, and any additional instructions.
 Students can view and download assignment files, as well as submit their completed
assignments.

63
Student grading system

5. Feedback Page:

 The feedback page allows teachers to provide feedback on student performance.

 It includes fields for the teacher to enter comments or suggestions.
 Students can view the feedback provided by their teachers.

6. Reports Page:

 The reports page generates comprehensive reports on student performance, class

averages, and trends.
 It may include options to select specific criteria or time periods for generating the reports.
 The reports can be displayed on the page or downloaded in a preferred format (such as
PDF or Excel).

7. User Management Page:

 The user management page is accessible to administrators.

 It allows administrators to manage user accounts, including creating new accounts,
modifying account details, and disabling accounts if needed.
 It may include forms or tables to input or display user information.

These are just a few examples of user interface screens that can be included in the student
grading system. The actual design and layout will depend on the specific requirements, user
needs, and design preferences. User interface prototyping helps to visualize and refine the design
before implementation, ensuring a user-friendly and intuitive system.

----------Chapter 3 ----------
3.1 introductions
"Welcome to our student grading management system! In today's world, the use of technology in
education is becoming increasingly important. With the vast amount of data that schools and
universities generate, it is essential to have an efficient and effective system to manage and
process student grades. Our system has been designed to provide a user-friendly interface for
teachers to manage their students' grades, generate reports, and provide students with their grades
and feedback in a timely manner. This system is not only beneficial for teachers, but it also
provides students with a clear understanding of their academic progress, which helps them to
identify areas where they need improvement. Our student grading management system is a
comprehensive solution that simplifies the grading process and helps to improve the overall
educational experience for both teachers and students."

64
Student grading system

3.2 Purpose of the System

The purpose of a student grading management system is to provide a centralized platform for
managing student grades and academic performance. The system is designed to facilitate the
grading process for teachers, increase efficiency and accuracy, and provide timely feedback to
students on their academic progress.

Some specific purposes of a student grading management system might include:

 Streamlining the grading process : The system should provide an easy-to-use interface
for teachers to record and manage student grades. This reduces the time and effort
required to manually calculate and enter grades, allowing teachers to focus on other
important tasks.
 Providing accurate and timely feedback: The system should provide real-time feedback to
students on their academic performance, allowing them to identify areas for improvement
and take corrective action.
 Encouraging student engagement: The system should provide students with a clear
understanding of their academic progress and performance, which can motivate them to
take an active role in their own learning and work harder to achieve their goals.

Improving communication: The system should facilitate communication between teachers,

students, and parents, allowing them to stay informed about academic progress, grades, and other
important information.

Overall, the purpose of a student grading management system is to improve the efficiency,
accuracy, and effectiveness of the grading process, while providing students with the feedback
and support they need to succeed academically.

3.3 Design Goals

The goals of system design in a student grading management system are to create a system that is
efficient, accurate, user-friendly, and secure. Some specific goals might include:

 Efficiency: The system should be designed to streamline the grading process and reduce
the time and effort required to enter and manage grades.
 Accuracy: The system should be designed to minimize errors and ensure that grades are
recorded accurately and consistently.
 User-friendliness: The system should be designed with a user-friendly interface that is
easy for teachers, students, and parents to navigate. This can include features such as
intuitive menus, clear instructions, and helpful prompts.

65
Student grading system

 Security: The system should be designed to protect sensitive student information and
prevent unauthorized access. This can include features such as strong passwords, data
encryption, and access controls.
 Scalability: The system should be designed to accommodate growth and changes in the
number of students, courses, and classes. This can include features such as flexible data
structures, modular design, and scalable hardware and software.

Overall, the goals of system design in a student grading management system are to create a
system that is efficient, accurate, user-friendly, secure, and scalable, in order to improve the
grading process and support student academic performance.

3.4 Current Software Architecture

The software architecture of a student grading management system refers to the overall structure
and organization of the software components that make up the system. It defines the
relationships between the components, the flow of data and information within the system, and
the interfaces between different parts of the system.

 The current software architecture of a student grading management system may vary
depending on the specific implementation. However, a typical architecture might include:
 User Interface: This component provides the interface through which users interact with
the system, such as logging in, entering grades, and generating reports.
 Application Logic: This component handles the business logic of the system, such as
calculating grades, generating reports, and managing student data.

 Database: This component stores the data used by the system, such as student
information, course information, and grades.

3.5 Proposed Software Architecture

A proposed software architecture for a student grading management system should aim to
improve the efficiency, scalability, and flexibility of the system. Here are some possible
components that could be included in a proposed software architecture for a student grading
management system:

 User Interface Layer: This layer is responsible for providing a user-friendly interface
for teachers, students, and administrators to interact with the system. It should be
designed to be easy to use, intuitive, and responsive.
 Application Layer: This layer is responsible for processing and managing the data that
is received from the user interface layer. It should include modules for managing student
data, course data, and grades.

66
Student grading system

 Service Layer: This layer provides a set of APIs (application programming interfaces)
and web services that can be used to access and manipulate data within the system. This
layer should be designed to be scalable and flexible, allowing for the addition or removal
of services as needed.
 Data Access Layer: This layer is responsible for managing the connection to the
database and retrieving and storing data within the system. It should include modules for
managing the database schema, data access, and data migration.
 Security Layer: This layer is responsible for ensuring the security of the system and
protecting sensitive data. It should include modules for authentication, authorization, and
encryption.

Overall, the proposed software architecture for a student grading management system should be
modular, scalable, and easy to maintain. It should support the efficient processing and
management of student grades and academic performance data, while also providing a high
degree of security and flexibility.

3.5.1 Subsystem Decomposition

Subsystem decomposition is the process of breaking down a complex system, such as a student
grading management system, into smaller, more manageable subsystems or modules. Each
subsystem is responsible for a specific aspect of the system's functionality and can be designed,
developed, tested, and maintained independently.

In the context of a student grading management system, subsystem decomposition might involve
breaking down the system into smaller subsystems, such as:

 User management subsystem: This subsystem is responsible for managing user

accounts, authentication, and authorization.
 Course management subsystem: This subsystem is responsible for managing course
information, including course schedules, assignments, and exams.
 Grading management subsystem: This subsystem is responsible for managing the grading
process, including entering and calculating grades, generating reports, and providing
feedback to students.
 Data management subsystem: This subsystem is responsible for managing the storage
and retrieval of data within the system, including student data, course data, and grade
data.
 Reporting subsystem: This subsystem is responsible for generating reports on student
performance, course completion, and other metrics.

By breaking down the system into smaller subsystems, each subsystem can be developed and
tested independently, making it easier to manage and maintain the system. Additionally,

67
Student grading system

subsystem decomposition can make it easier to identify and fix problems within the system,
since issues can be isolated to specific subsystems rather than the entire system.

 Network: This component handles the communication between different parts of the
system, such as transmitting data between the user interface, application logic, and
database.
 Security: This component ensures the security of the system, such as protecting sensitive
data, preventing unauthorized access, and implementing user authentication and
authorization.

Overall, the current software architecture of a student grading management system is designed to
provide a flexible, modular, and scalable system that can efficiently manage and process student
grades and academic performance data.

3.5.2 Component Diagram

A component diagram is a type of UML (Unified Modeling Language) diagram that shows the
components of a system and their relationships. Here's an example of a component diagram for a
student grading management system:

68
Student grading system

In this diagram, the "Student Grading Management System" is the main component of the
system. It contains four sub-components:

 User Interface: This component is responsible for providing a user-friendly interface for
teachers, students, and administrators to interact with the system.
 Application Logic: This component is responsible for processing and managing the data
that is received from the user interface layer. It includes modules for managing student
data, course data, and grades.
 Data Access Layer: This component is responsible for managing the connection to the
database and retrieving and storing data within the system.
 Security Layer: This component is responsible for ensuring the security of the system
and protecting sensitive data.

Each component is connected to the Student Grading Management System component,

indicating that they are part of the system. The connections between the components show the
relationships between them, such as how the user interface component interacts with the
application logic component to process user requests.

This component diagram provides a high-level view of the system architecture and can be used
to communicate the system design to stakeholders, such as developers, project managers, and
users.

3.5.3 Deployment Diagram

A deployment diagram is a type of UML (Unified Modeling Language) diagram that shows the
physical deployment of software components within a system. Here's an example deployment
diagram for a student grading management system:

69
Student grading system

In this diagram, the "Student Grading Management System" is shown as a single component,
which is deployed on a server or set of servers. Each of the four sub-components is deployed on
the same server(s) as the main system component.

The "Database" component represents the database management system, which is used to store
and manage the data used by the system. The database component is shown as a separate
component since it is typically deployed on a separate server.

The connections between the components show the communication between the system
components. For example, the user interface component communicates with the application logic
component to process user requests, and the application logic component communicates with the
data access layer component to retrieve and store data in the database.

This deployment diagram provides a high-level view of the physical deployment of the system
components and can be used to communicate the system design to stakeholders, such as system
administrators and infrastructure teams.

3.5.4 Persistent data Management

Persistent data management refers to the process of storing and managing data in a way that
allows it to be accessed and used over an extended period of time. In the context of a student
grading management system, persistent data management involves storing and managing student
data, course data, and grade data in a way that is secure, efficient, and reliable.

70
Student grading system

There are several approaches to persistent data management, including:

 Relational database management systems (RDBMS): This approach involves storing

data in a relational database, which is a structured and organized collection of data that is
accessed using a query language such as SQL. RDBMS systems are widely used in
student grading management systems because they provide a flexible and efficient way to
store and manage large amounts of data.
 Object-oriented database management systems (OODBMS): This approach involves
storing data in an object-oriented database, which is a database that stores data in the
form of objects and classes. OODBMS systems are less commonly used in student
grading management systems, but they can be useful for managing complex data
structures and relationships.
 NoSQL databases: This approach involves using a non-relational database management
system, which is a database that does not use a traditional relational model. NoSQL
databases are becoming increasingly popular in student grading management systems
because they can be more scalable and flexible than traditional RDBMS systems.

Regardless of the approach used, persistent data management in a student grading management
system should be designed to ensure the integrity, security, and availability of the data. This can
involve implementing measures such as data encryption, backups, and access controls to protect
the data from loss, corruption, and unauthorized access.

3.5.5 Access Control and Security

Access control and security are essential components of system design in a student grading
management system. Access control refers to the process of regulating who has access to the
system and what they can do within the system. Security refers to the measures taken to protect
the system from unauthorized access, data theft, and other security threats.

In a student grading management system, access control and security can be implemented
through various mechanisms, such as:

 User authentication: This involves verifying the identity of users who are attempting to
access the system, typically through the use of usernames and passwords. Multi-factor
authentication can also be used to provide an additional layer of security.
 User authorization: This involves determining what level of access users have within
the system based on their roles and permissions. For example, teachers may have access
to enter and edit grades, while students may only have access to view their own grades.
 Role-based access control (RBAC): This is a method of access control that restricts
system access based on the roles and responsibilities of users. RBAC can be used to
ensure that users only have access to the system functions that are relevant to their roles.

71
Student grading system

 Data encryption: This involves converting sensitive data into a format that can only be
read with a decryption key. Data encryption can be used to protect sensitive data such as
student information and grades.

 Network security: This involves securing the network infrastructure that the system runs
on, such as firewalls, intrusion detection systems, and monitoring tools. Network security
can be used to protect the system from external threats and attacks.

Overall, access control and security are critical components of system design in a student grading
management system. By implementing appropriate access control and security measures, the
system can be protected from unauthorized access, data theft, and other security threats, ensuring
the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of student data.

3.5.6 Global Software Control

Global software control refers to the processes and mechanisms used to manage the software
development lifecycle and ensure the quality, reliability, and maintainability of the student
grading management system. This includes the tools and practices used to manage the
development, testing, deployment, and maintenance of the system, as well as the policies and
procedures used to ensure compliance with relevant regulations and standards.

In a student grading management system, global software control might involve:

 Version control: This involves using a version control system, such as Git, to manage
the source code of the system. Version control allows developers to track changes to the
codebase, collaborate on code changes, and revert to previous versions if necessary.
 Code reviews: This involves reviewing and testing the code changes made by developers
to ensure that they meet the system requirements and coding standards.
 Testing: This involves using automated and manual testing techniques to ensure that the
system functions correctly and meets the expected requirements.
 Continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD): This involves automating the
process of building, testing, and deploying the system to production environments. CI/CD
can help to ensure that the system remains stable and reliable as new features and updates
are added.
 Compliance and security: This involves ensuring that the system complies with relevant
regulations and standards, such as data protection laws and security standards. This can
involve implementing processes and tools to monitor and manage security risks and
vulnerabilities.

Overall, global software control is an essential component of system design in a student grading
management system. By implementing robust software development and management practices,

72
Student grading system

the system can be developed and maintained in a way that ensures its quality, reliability, and
security.

3.5.7 Boundary Condition

Boundary conditions in system design refer to the limits or constraints that must be considered
when designing and implementing a system. These conditions can include limitations on
resources such as hardware, software, and network capabilities, as well as limitations on the
system's functionality and performance.

In the context of a student grading management system, some examples of boundary conditions
that might need to be considered include:

 System capacity: The system must be designed to handle the expected number of users
and the amount of data that will be processed. This includes considerations such as server
capacity, network bandwidth, and database size.
 Security: The system must be designed to ensure the security and privacy of student
data, including measures such as data encryption, access controls, and monitoring.
 Compliance: The system must comply with relevant regulations and standards, such as
data protection laws and security standards.
 Accessibility: The system must be designed to be accessible to all users, including those
with disabilities, by complying with accessibility standards such as WCAG (Web Content
Accessibility Guidelines).
 Performance: The system must be designed to perform efficiently and reliably, with fast
response times and minimal downtime.

By considering these boundary conditions, system designers can ensure that the student grading
management system is designed and implemented in a way that meets the needs of its users
while also ensuring its efficiency, security, and compliance with relevant regulations and
standards.

4.5 Training and Installation

Training and installation are important components of the implementation and testing phase of a
student grading management system.

Training refers to the process of providing users with the knowledge and skills needed to use the
system effectively. This includes providing training on how to use the user interface, how to
enter and manage student data, and how to generate and analyze reports. The training may be
provided through various means, such as classroom sessions, online tutorials, or user manuals.
73
Student grading system

Installation refers to the process of deploying the system to the production environment and
configuring it to work with the hardware and software components of the system. This includes
installing the necessary software and hardware components, configuring the database, and setting
up the network connections.

Both training and installation are important parts of the implementation and testing phase of a
student grading management system because they ensure that the system is properly installed and
that users are trained to use it effectively. Without proper training, users may struggle to use the
system effectively, leading to errors and inefficiencies. Without proper installation, the system
may not function correctly, leading to errors and downtime.

During the testing phase, both training and installation are tested to ensure that they are working
correctly. This may involve testing the system's user interface to ensure that it is intuitive and
easy to use, and testing the system's installation to ensure that it is properly configured and
functioning correctly. Any issues or problems identified during testing can be addressed and
resolved before the system is deployed to production.

Overall, training and installation are critical components of the implementation and testing phase
of a student grading management system, ensuring that the system is properly installed and that
users are trained to use it effectively.

4.6 Startup Strategy

Developing a startup strategy for the implementation and testing phase of a student grading
management system can help to ensure that the system is deployed successfully and that any
issues are identified and addressed quickly. Here are some steps you can take to develop a
startup strategy:

 Define the project scope: Define the scope of the implementation and testing phase,
including the specific objectives, deliverables, and timelines.
 Identify the stakeholders: Identify the stakeholders involved in the implementation and
testing phase, including the project team, end-users, and any external stakeholders.
 Allocate resources: Determine the resources needed for the implementation and testing
phase, including personnel, equipment, and budget.
 Develop a deployment plan: Develop a plan for deploying the system to the production
environment, including the installation process, configuration of hardware and software
components, and testing of the system.
 Develop a testing plan: Develop a plan for testing the system, including the types of
tests to be performed, the testing environment, and the criteria for success.
 Develop a training plan: Develop a plan for training end-users on how to use the system
effectively, including the training methods and materials.

74
Student grading system

 Define metrics and monitoring: Define the metrics and monitoring processes that will
be used to measure the success of the implementation and testing phase, including
performance metrics and user feedback.
 Develop a contingency plan: Develop a contingency plan for addressing any issues or
problems that may arise during the implementation and testing phase.

By developing a startup strategy for the implementation and testing phase of a student grading
management system, you can ensure that the system is deployed successfully and that any issues
are identified and addressed quickly, minimizing the impact on end-users.

------------Chapter 4---------
4.1 Algorithm Design and Coding
Here is an example of an algorithm design and coding for a simple task of calculating the
average grade for a student based on inputted grades:

Algorithm Design:

Initialize a variable sum to 0 to hold the sum of grades.

Initialize a variable count to 0 to keep track of the number of grades entered.

Ask the user to input grades until they indicate they are done.

For each grade entered, add it to the sum and increment count by 1.

Calculate the average grade by dividing the sum by count.

Display the average grade to the user.

Coding Example in Python:

def calculate_average_grade():
sum_of_grades = 0
count = 0

while True:
grade = input("Enter a grade (or 'done' to calculate average): ")
if grade.lower() == 'done':
break

75
Student grading system

try:
grade = float(grade)
sum_of_grades += grade
count += 1
except ValueError:
print("Invalid input. Please enter a number or 'done'.")

if count > 0:
average_grade = sum_of_grades / count
print("Average grade: ", average_grade)
else:
print("No grades entered.")

calculate_average_grade()

In this example, the calculate_average_grade() function prompts the user to enter grades until
they enter 'done'. It validates the input to ensure it is a number and updates the sum_of_grades
and count variables accordingly. Finally, it calculates and displays the average grade.

You can run this Python code to test the algorithm. It will repeatedly prompt you to enter grades,
and when you are done, it will calculate and display the average grade.

This is a simple example, but algorithms and coding can become more complex depending on
the specific requirements and functionalities of the grading system.

4.2 User Interface Design and Sample Code

76
Student grading system

Here's an example of user interface design and sample code for a student grading system using
Python's Tkinter library:

User Interface Design:

Login Page:

Input fields for username and password.

Login button to submit the login credentials.

Dashboard:

Display of important information such as upcoming assignments, recent grades, and attendance
records.

Navigation buttons or tabs to access different features.

Grades Page:

Table or list format to display the grades for the selected subject or assessment.

Filter or sort options for the grades.

Assignments Page:

77
Student grading system

List of upcoming assignments or tasks, including assignment name and due date.

Download button for assignment files.

Upload button to submit completed assignments.

Sample Code in Python using Tkinter:

import tkinter as tk

# Login Page
def login():
username = username_entry.get()
password = password_entry.get()
# Perform login verification logic here

login_window = tk.Tk()
login_window.title("Student Grading System")

username_label = tk.Label(login_window, text="Username:")

username_label.pack()
username_entry = tk.Entry(login_window)
username_entry.pack()

password_label = tk.Label(login_window, text="Password:")

password_label.pack()
password_entry = tk.Entry(login_window, show="*")
password_entry.pack()

login_button = tk.Button(login_window, text="Login", command=login)

login_button.pack()

# Dashboard
dashboard_window = tk.Tk()
dashboard_window.title("Dashboard")

# Display important information, navigation buttons, etc.

# Grades Page
grades_window = tk.Tk()
grades_window.title("Grades")

# Display grades table or list, filter/sort options, etc.

# Assignments Page
assignments_window = tk.Tk()

78
Student grading system

assignments_window.title("Assignments")

# Display list of assignments, download/upload buttons, etc.

login_window.mainloop()

In this example, the code demonstrates the implementation of the login page using Tkinter. It
creates a window, adds labels and entry fields for username and password, and a login button.
The login() function is called when the login button is clicked to perform login verification logic.

You can expand on this code to create additional windows and functionalities for the dashboard,
grades page, and assignments page. Tkinter provides a range of widgets and layout options to
design the user interface as required.

Please note that this is a basic example, and you can customize the design, add more features,
and implement the logic according to your specific requirements.

4.5 Training and Installation

Training and installation are important components of the implementation and testing phase of a
student grading management system.

Training refers to the process of providing users with the knowledge and skills needed to use the
system effectively. This includes providing training on how to use the user interface, how to
enter and manage student data, and how to generate and analyze reports. The training may be
provided through various means, such as classroom sessions, online tutorials, or user manuals.

Installation refers to the process of deploying the system to the production environment and
configuring it to work with the hardware and software components of the system. This includes
installing the necessary software and hardware components, configuring the database, and setting
up the network connections.

Both training and installation are important parts of the implementation and testing phase of a
student grading management system because they ensure that the system is properly installed and
that users are trained to use it effectively. Without proper training, users may struggle to use the
system effectively, leading to errors and inefficiencies. Without proper installation, the system
may not function correctly, leading to errors and downtime.

During the testing phase, both training and installation are tested to ensure that they are working
correctly. This may involve testing the system's user interface to ensure that it is intuitive and
easy to use, and testing the system's installation to ensure that it is properly configured and
functioning correctly. Any issues or problems identified during testing can be addressed and
resolved before the system is deployed to production.

79
Student grading system

Overall, training and installation are critical components of the implementation and testing phase
of a student grading management system, ensuring that the system is properly installed and that
users are trained to use it effectively.

4.6 Startup Strategy

Developing a startup strategy for the implementation and testing phase of a student grading
management system can help to ensure that the system is deployed successfully and that any
issues are identified and addressed quickly. Here are some steps you can take to develop a
startup strategy:

 Define the project scope: Define the scope of the implementation and testing phase,
including the specific objectives, deliverables, and timelines.
 Identify the stakeholders: Identify the stakeholders involved in the implementation and
testing phase, including the project team, end-users, and any external stakeholders.
 Allocate resources: Determine the resources needed for the implementation and testing
phase, including personnel, equipment, and budget.
 Develop a deployment plan: Develop a plan for deploying the system to the production
environment, including the installation process, configuration of hardware and software
components, and testing of the system.
 Develop a testing plan: Develop a plan for testing the system, including the types of
tests to be performed, the testing environment, and the criteria for success.
 Develop a training plan: Develop a plan for training end-users on how to use the system
effectively, including the training methods and materials.
 Define metrics and monitoring: Define the metrics and monitoring processes that will
be used to measure the success of the implementation and testing phase, including
performance metrics and user feedback.
 Develop a contingency plan: Develop a contingency plan for addressing any issues or
problems that may arise during the implementation and testing phase.

By developing a startup strategy for the implementation and testing phase of a student grading
management system, you can ensure that the system is deployed successfully and that any issues
are identified and addressed quickly, minimizing the impact on end-users.

80
Student grading system

81