GTS CPS 1.0
GTS CPS 1.0
0
Contents
1. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1.1. Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1.2. Document name and identification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1.3. PKI participants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1.3.1. Certification authorities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Root CAs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Intermediate CAs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Externally Operated Subordinate CAs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1.3.2. Registration authorities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
1.3.3. Subscribers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
1.3.4. Relying parties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1.3.5. Other participants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1.4. Certificate usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1.4.1. Appropriate certificate uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1.4.2. Prohibited certificate uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1.5. Policy administration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1.5.1. Organization administering the document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1.5.2. Contact person . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1.5.3. Person determining CPS suitability for the policy . . . . . . . . . . . 12
1.5.4. CPS approval procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
1.6. Definitions and acronyms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
2. PUBLICATION AND REPOSITORY RESPONSIBILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.1. Repositories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.2. Publication of certification information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.3. Time or frequency of publication . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
2.4. Access controls on repositories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
3. IDENTIFICATION AND AUTHENTICATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
3.1. Naming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
3.1.1. Types of names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
3.1.2. Need for names to be meaningful . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
3.1.3. Anonymity or pseudonymity of subscribers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
3.1.4. Rules for interpreting various name forms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
3.1.5. Uniqueness of names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
3.1.6. Recognition, authentication, and role of trademarks . . . . . . . . . . 15
3.2. Initial identity validation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
3.2.1. Method to prove possession of private key . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
3.2.2. Authentication of organization identity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 2
3.2.2.1. Identity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
3.2.2.2. DBA/Tradename . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
3.2.2.3. Verification of Country . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
3.2.2.4. Authorization by Domain Name Registrant . . . . . . . . . . 16
3.2.2.5. Authentication for an IP Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
3.2.2.6. Wildcard Domain Validation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
3.2.2.7. Data Source Accuracy and Validity Periods . . . . . . . . . . 17
3.2.3. Authentication of individual identity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
3.2.4. Non-verified subscriber information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
3.2.5. Validation of authority . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
3.2.6. Criteria for interoperation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
3.3. Identification and authentication for re-key requests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
3.3.1. Identification and authentication for routine re-key . . . . . . . . . . . 18
3.4. Identification and authentication for revocation request . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
4. CERTIFICATE LIFE-CYCLE OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . 19
4.1. Certificate Application . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
4.1.1. Who can submit a certificate application . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
4.1.2. Enrollment process and responsibilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
4.2. Certificate application processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
4.2.1. Performing identification and authentication functions . . . . . . . . . 19
4.2.2. Approval or rejection of certificate applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
4.2.3. Time to process certificate applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
4.2.4. Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) records . . . . . . . . . 20
4.3. Certificate issuance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
4.3.1. CA actions during certificate issuance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
4.3.2. Notification to subscriber by the CA of issuance of certificate . . . . . 20
4.4. Certificate acceptance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
4.4.1. Conduct constituting certificate acceptance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
4.4.2. Publication of the certificate by the CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
4.4.3. Notification of certificate issuance by the CA to other entities . . . . . 21
4.5. Key pair and certificate usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
4.5.1. Subscriber private key and certificate usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
4.5.2. Relying party public key and certificate usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
4.6. Certificate renewal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
4.6.1. Circumstance for certificate renewal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
4.6.2. Who may request renewal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
4.6.3. Processing certificate renewal requests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
4.6.4. Notification of new certificate issuance to subscriber . . . . . . . . . . 22
4.6.5. Conduct constituting acceptance of a renewal certificate . . . . . . . . 22
4.6.6. Publication of the renewal certificate by the CA . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
4.6.7. Notification of certificate issuance by the CA to other entities . . . . . 22
4.7. Certificate re-key . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
4.7.1. Circumstance for certificate re-key . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
4.7.2. Who may request certification of a new public key . . . . . . . . . . . 22
4.7.3. Processing certificate re-keying requests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
4.7.4. Notification of new certificate issuance to subscriber . . . . . . . . . . 23
4.7.5. Conduct constituting acceptance of a re-keyed certificate . . . . . . . 23
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 3
6.1.7 Key usage purposes (as per X.509 v3. key usage field) . . . . . . . . . 41
6.2. Private Key Protection and Cryptographic Module Engineering Controls . . . . 41
6.2.1. Cryptographic module standards and controls . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
6.2.2. Private key (n out of m) multi-person control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
6.2.3. Private key escrow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
6.2.4. Private key backup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
6.2.5. Private key archival . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
6.2.6. Private key transfer into or from a cryptographic module . . . . . . . 42
6.2.7. Private key storage on cryptographic module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
6.2.8. Method of activating private key . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
6.2.9. Method of deactivating private key . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
6.2.10. Method of destroying private key . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
6.2.11. Cryptographic Module Rating . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
6.3. Other aspects of key pair management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
6.3.1. Public key archival . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
6.3.2. Certificate operational periods and key pair usage periods . . . . . . . 42
6.4. Activation data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
6.4.1. Activation data generation and installation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
6.4.2. Activation data protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
6.4.3. Other aspects of activation data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
6.5. Computer security controls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
6.5.1. Specific computer security technical requirements . . . . . . . . . . . 43
6.5.2. Computer security rating . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
6.6. Life cycle technical controls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
6.6.1. System development controls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
6.6.2. Security management controls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
6.6.3. Life cycle security controls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
6.7. Network security controls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
6.8. Time-stamping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
7. CERTIFICATE, CRL, AND OCSP PROFILES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
7.1. Certificate profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
7.1.1. Version number(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
7.1.2. Certificate extensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
7.1.3. Algorithm object identifiers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
7.1.4. Name forms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
7.1.5. Name constraints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
7.1.6. Certificate policy object identifier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
7.1.7. Usage of Policy Constraints extension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
7.1.8. Policy qualifiers syntax and semantics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
7.1.9. Processing semantics for the critical Certificate Policies extension . . . 46
7.2. CRL profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
7.2.1. Version number(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
7.2.2. CRL and CRL entry extensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
7.3. OCSP profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
7.3.1. Version number(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
7.3.2. OCSP extensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
8. COMPLIANCE AUDIT AND OTHER ASSESSMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 6
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Overview
The Google Public Key Infrastructure (“Google PKI”), has been established by Google Trust
Services, LLC (“Google”), to enable reliable and secure identity authentication, and to facilitate
the preservation of confidentiality and integrity of data in electronic transactions. This document is
issued by Google to identify the practices and procedures that Google employs in issuing certificates
from its Certificate Authorities within the Google PKI.
The term Certification Authority (CA) is an umbrella term that refers to all entities authorized to
issue, manage, revoke, and renew certificates. Moreover it can refer to the infrastructure and key
material from which such an entity issues and signs certificates.
This CPS covers all certificates issued and signed by the following CAs hereinafter referred to as
‘Google CAs’.
Root CAs
• GTS Root R1
Key: RSA 4096, SHA-384
Serial#: 6e:47:a9:c5:4b:47:0c:0d:ec:33:d0:89:b9:1c:f4:e1
Thumbprint: e1:c9:50:e6:ef:22:f8:4c:56:45:72:8b:92:20:60:d7:d5:a7:a3:e8
Valid until: Jun 22, 2036
• GTS Root R2
Key: RSA 4096, SHA-384
Serial#: 6e:47:a9:c6:5a:b3:e7:20:c5:30:9a:3f:68:52:f2:6f
Thumbprint: d2:73:96:2a:2a:5e:39:9f:73:3f:e1:c7:1e:64:3f:03:38:34:fc:4d
Valid until: Jun 22, 2036
• GTS Root R3
Key: ECC 384, SHA-384
Serial#: 6e:47:a9:c7:6c:a9:73:24:40:89:0f:03:55:dd:8d:1d
Thumbprint: 30:d4:24:6f:07:ff:db:91:89:8a:0b:e9:49:66:11:eb:8c:5e:46:e5
Valid until: Jun 22, 2036
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 9
• GTS Root R4
Key: ECC 384, SHA-384
Serial#: 6e:47:a9:c8:8b:94:b6:e8:bb:3b:2a:d8:a2:b2:c1:99
Thumbprint: 2a:1d:60:27:d9:4a:b1:0a:1c:4d:91:5c:cd:33:a0:cb:3e:2d:54:cb
Valid until: Jun 22, 2036
• Root R2
Key: RSA 2048, SHA-1
Serial#: 04:00:00:00:00:01:0f:86:26:e6:0d
Thumbprint: 75:e0:ab:b6:13:85:12:27:1c:04:f8:5f:dd:de:38:e4:b7:24:2e:fe
Valid until: Dec 15, 2021
• Root R4
Key: ECC 256, SHA-256
Serial#: 2a:38:a4:1c:96:0a:04:de:42:b2:28:a5:0b:e8:34:98:02
Thumbprint: 69:69:56:2e:40:80:f4:24:a1:e7:19:9f:14:ba:f3:ee:58:ab:6a:bb
Valid until: Jan 19, 2038
Effective Oct 1, 2016 the Root R2 and Root R4 operate under this CPS. Prior to that date it was
operated by GlobalSign NV under their Certificate Policy and Certification Practice Statement.
The CA certificates of the above listed CAs can be retrieved at http://pki.goog/.
Intermediate CAs
• GTS X1
Key: RSA 2048, SHA-256
Serial#: 6e:47:a9:c9:a5:53:e3:c2:ce:1f:14:4e:d7:7d:ac:e7
Thumbprint: 0f:d1:f2:00:9d:51:01:1d:23:f8:72:96:27:90:d1:c8:23:44:33:6f
Valid until: Jun 22, 2026
• GTS X2
Key: RSA 2048, SHA-256
Serial#: 6e:47:a9:ca:ce:7f:84:65:19:2e:e7:33:2b:27:27:c3
Thumbprint: 29:35:6c:48:6b:b0:e2:ec:8a:0f:c9:0b:ed:73:b8:fa:1d:c1:13:df
Valid until: Jun 22, 2026
• GTS X3
Key: RSA 2048, SHA-256
Serial#: 6e:47:a9:cc:b4:5a:29:c7:b0:78:d0:1b:a3:21:12:61
Thumbprint: c1:dd:09:28:69:8b:06:c6:fb:1f:7c:db:10:03:d8:7b:51:26:11:ae
Valid until: Jun 22, 2026
• GTS X4
Key: RSA 2048, SHA-256
Serial#: 6e:47:a9:ce:4f:46:c2:3d:e2:49:ea:cc:38:94:53:73
Thumbprint: e0:fb:04:9e:23:c6:59:20:8b:62:33:68:a0:d2:61:e3:9a:42:18:b2
Valid until: Jun 22, 2026
The CA certificates of the above listed CAs can be retrieved at http://pki.goog/.
The following externally operated subordinate CAs have a Google CA listed as the issuer of their
CA certificate.
• GlobalSign Extended Validation CA - G2
Key: RSA 2048, SHA-256
Serial#: 04:00:00:00:00:01:44:4e:f0:4a:55
Thumbprint: 65:be:10:2b:e2:69:28:65:0e:0e:f5:4d:c8:f4:f1:5a:f5:f9:8e:8b
Valid until: Dec 15, 2021
Cross Certified: February 2014
Certificate: DER
Registration Authorities (RAs) are entities that approve and authenticate requests to obtain, renew,
or revoke Certificates. RAs are generally responsible for identifying and authenticating Applicants
for Certificates, verifying their authorization to request Certificates, approving individuals, entities,
and/or devices to be named in Certificates, and authorizing and/or requesting a CA to issue, renew,
or revoke a Certificate to an individual, entity or device.
All RA functions for the Google CAs listed in this CPS will be performed by Google.
1.3.3. Subscribers
A Relying Party is any individual or entity that acts in reliance on a Google Certificate to verify a
digital signature and/or decrypt an encrypted document or message. Relying Parties may include
Google and Google Affiliates, as well as unaffiliated individuals or entities.
The Google CAs listed in this CPS are operated by Google Inc on behalf of Google Trust Services
LLC.
Appropriate Certificate uses under this CPS are all uses for the purpose of authentication, using
digital signatures, encryption and access control which are consistent with the key usage extension
fields of the respective Certificate and are not in violation of the CP, this CPS, applicable law or
any agreement made between the Subscriber and Google.
Certificates are not proof of the trustworthiness or honesty of the subscriber nor do they indicate
the subscriber’s compliance with any law. By issuing a certificate Google merely confirms that it
has used reasonable means to verify the information in the certificate before it was issued.
Certificates issued under this CPS are not intended and may not be used for any application
requiring fail-safe performance such as (a) the operation of nuclear power facilities, (b) air traffic
control systems, (c) aircraft navigation systems, (d) weapons control systems, or (e) any other
system whose failure could lead to injury, death or environmental damage.
Google certificates may not be used for man-in-themiddle purposes or where usage is prohibited
by law.
The Google CA Policy Authority is responsible for the drafting, maintenance, and interpretation
of this Certification Practice Statement.
The Google CA Policy Authority determines the suitability and applicability of this CPS.
Google may change this CPS as deemed necessary. Changes that in the judgment of Google
will have no or only a minimal effect on Participants in the Google PKI, may be made without
notification. Changes, that in the judgment of Google will have a significant impact on Participants
in the Google PKI, will be made with prior notice to such Participants.
CPS changes and potential notofications will be published at http://pki.goog/.
A new version of the CPS will become effective fifteen (15) days after it has been published, and
will supersede all previous versions and will be binding on all Participants in the Google PKI from
that point forward.
2.1. Repositories
Google maintains a Repository which comprises its root certificates, its current CP and CPS,
Subscriber Agreements, Relying Party Agreements, and the most recent revocation information
for certificates it has issued.
Additionally Google publishes all non-constrained Subordinate CA Certificates and all Cross Cer-
tificates it issues including a link to the CPS under which they were issued.
Google represents that it will adhere to the latest version of the CP published in the Repository.
The Repository can be accessed at http://pki.goog/.
Web Pages that can be used by application software suppliers to test their software with subscriber
certificates that chain up to each publicly trusted root certificate are hosted at http://pki.goog/.
Google’s practice with regards to CAA records is stated in section 4.2.4.
CA CRL
GTS Root R1 http://crl.pki.goog/gtsr1/gtsr1.crl
GTS Root R2 http://crl.pki.goog/gtsr2/gtsr2.crl
GTS Root R3 http://crl.pki.goog/gtsr3/gtsr3.crl
GTS Root R4 http://crl.pki.goog/gtsr4/gtsr4.crl
Root R2 http://crl.globalsign.net/root-r2.crl
Root R4 http://crl.globalsign.net/root-r4.crl
3.1. Naming
3.1.1. Types of names
Certificates contain an X.501 distinguished name in the Subject name field, and incorporate the
following attributes:
• Country (C)
• Organization (O)
• Organizational Unit (OU)
• State or Province (S)
• Locality (L)
• Common Name (CN)
• E-mail Address (E)
Certificates also incorporate the Subject Alternative Name (SAN) attribute, which repeats the
Common Name, as well as any other names that may apply to the subject.
Domain names included in the CN or SAN attributes must identify one or more specific hosts.
Google may issue wildcard certificates, which identify a set of hosts.
No stipulation
No stipulation
Certificate Applicants are prohibited from requesting certificates that contain content which is
infringing on the intellectual property and commercial rights of others. Google does not determine
whether Certificate Applicants have intellectual property rights in the name used in a Certificate
Application nor does Google resolve any dispute concerning the ownership of a domain name or
trademark. Google may reject any Certificate Application and revoke any Certificate because of
such a dispute.
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 16
The Certificate Applicant must prove ownership of the private key by providing a PKCS #10
compliant certificate signing request, or a cryptographically equivalent proof. This requirement
does not apply when a key pair is generated by Google on behalf of the Applicant.
3.2.2.1. Identity
Google follows the CP when verifying the identity of Certificate Applicants.
3.2.2.2. DBA/Tradename
Google follows the CP when verifying that the Applicant holds the right to use a DBA/Tradename
to be included in the Subject Identity information.
• Verify that the domain name is registered with an Internet Corporation for Assigned Names
and Numbers (ICANN)-approved registrar or a registry listed by the Internet Assigned Num-
bers Authority (IANA). Subdomains must be for a domain appropriately registered with these
organizations.
• Verify that the Domain registration information in the WHOIS database is public and shows
the name, physical address, and administrative contact information for the entity to be
named as the Subject in the Certificate. When a WHOIS database is not available, obtain
compensating confirmation from the registry or registrar;
• Verify that the entity to be named as the Subject in the Certificate is the registered holder
of the domain name, or alternatively, that it has the exclusive right to use the domain name
by (i) verifying the identity of the person that is the registered holder of the domain name,
and (ii) obtaining a verified confirmation from such owner of the domain name confirming
such exclusive right to use the domain name;
• Verify that the entity to be named as the Subject in the Certificate is aware of its registration
of the domain name.
Google may require additional proof of ownership from the Applicant in case of doubt.
Google maintains procedures to ensure that its Identification and Authentication practices comply
with the provisions on individual identification as set out in the CP.
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 18
Google uses a reliable method of communication with the Applicant or its Representative.
The authority of Certificate Applicants to request Certificates on behalf of an organization is
verified during the validation of the Applicant’s identity. The verification is based on one or
several of the sources listed in section 3.2.2 and its respective subsections.
Google may allow Applicants to specify in writing the individuals who may request Certificates on
its behalf. Where such a specification has been made, Google does not accept certificate requests
that are outside this specification but will upon written request provide the Applicant a list of its
authorized certificate requesters.
All Cross Certificates that identify a Google CA as the Subject are listed in the Repository, provided
that Google has arranged for or accepted the establishment of the trust relationship.
Applications for a Google Certificate that names an entity as the Subject may be submitted by
a Representative employed by or contracted by, and authorized to act on behalf of the concerned
entity.
Applicants seeking to obtain a Google Certificate must submit to Google a certificate application
form including a certificate request and provide at a minimum, the following:
• The identity of the Subscriber to be named as the Subject in the Certificate;
• The Public Key to be included in the Certificate (if the Subscriber has generated its own
Key Pair);
• The fully qualified domain names to be included in the Certificate (if the Certificate will
contain a domain name);
• An executed Subscriber Agreement, which may be electronic;
• Any other relevant information that Google requests.
Google performs identification and authentication of all required Subscriber information, as spec-
ified in section 3.2. If this information is not included in the certificate application and cannot be
readily obtained from a trusted internal data source, the employee who processes the application
requests the applicant to provide the required information in an alternative form.
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 20
Data obtained for identification and authentication purposes from a trusted third party source, is
confirmed with the Applicant before it is used.
Google maintains procedures to identify High Risk Certificate Requests that require additional
verification activity prior to their approval. This includes maintaining an internal database of all
Certificates that have previously been revoked and all certificate requests that have been rejected
due to suspected phishing or other fraudulent usage or concerns. This information is used during
identification and authentication to identify suspicious certificate requests.
Google may approve an application if all required subscriber information has been provided and
validated. All other request will be rejected.
Certificate applications that contain a new gTLD are not approved while the gTLD is still under
consideration by ICANN.
Applications for subordinate CAs are not approved unless the CA in question will be operated by
Google or one of its affiliates and will be governed by the CP and this CPS.
Where Google has entered into a written Service Level Agreement with the Applicant Google will
process certificate applications in accordance with the Service Level Objectives defined therein.
Otherwise certificate applications will be processed within a reasonable timeframe.
Google does not review Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) DNS Resource Records for
certificate application processing.
Prior to issuing a Certificate Google processes the Certificate Application and performs the required
I&A procedures in accordance with this CPS. Once these procedures have been completed, the
Certificate is generated and the appropriate key usage extension added.
Certificate Issuance by a root CA requires a CA Engineer to deliberately issue a direct command
in order to perform the certificate signing operation.
After issuing the Certificate, Google will notify the Applicant via e-mail or an alternate means of
communication and will provide the Applicant with appropriate instructions on how to obtain the
Certificate. Delivery of the Certificate will be made via a designated Google service.
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 21
Google may notify the public of the issuance of a certificate by submitting it to one or more publicly
accessible Certificate Transparency logs.
No stipulation.
No stipulation.
Certificate renewal is the process whereby a new Certificate with an updated validity period is
created for an existing Key Pair.
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 22
As a general matter, Google does not offer Certificate renewal. Whenever a Google Certificate
expires, the Subscriber is required to generate a new Key Pair and request a new Certificate in
accordance with this CPS.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Google treats certificate re-key requests as requests for the issuance of a new Certificate.
Not applicable.
12. Google’s right to issue Certificates expires or is revoked or terminated, unless it has made
arrangements to continue maintaining the CRL/OCSP Repository;
13. Google is made aware of a possible compromise of the Private Key of the Subordinate CA
used for issuing the Certificate;
14. Revocation is required by the CP and/or Certification Practice Statement; or
15. The technical content or format of the Certificate presents an unacceptable risk to Application
Software Suppliers or Relying Parties (e.g. the CA/Browser Forum might determine that a
deprecated cryptographic/signature algorithm or key size presents an unacceptable risk and
that such Certificates should be revoked and replaced by CAs within a given period of time).
Requests for Certificate revocation and reports concerning suspected certificate misuse, fraud, inap-
propriare conduct and other certificate related matters can be submitted via e-mail to pki-contact@
google.com. If the request or report is related to a potential compromise of the private key of a
certificate, the requestor should also contact [email protected].
Google maintains capabilities to receive Certificate revocation requests 24/7.
Certificate revocation requests that are made by the Subscriber are evaluated using the Identifica-
tion and Authorization criteria set out in section 3 of the CP. Requests made by other parties are
evaluated on a case by case basis taking into consideration the following criteria:
• The nature of the alleged problem reported by the requestor;
• The evidence provided in support of the request;
• The urgency of the request;
• The quantity of requests received in relation to the concerned Certificate or Subscriber;
• The entity making the request; and
• Applicable legislation.
If Google determines that a revocation is warranted it updates the certificate status information
accordingly. Where appropriate Google may also forward the case to law enforcement.
The evaluation of a Certificate revocation request begins within 24 hours after the request has
been received. If Google determines that a Revocation is warranted it updates the CRL promptly
and in no case later than one business day following Revocation.
Relying Parties are required to confirm the validity of each Certificate in the certificate chain by
checking the applicable CRL or OCSP responder before relying on a Google Certificate.
For the status of Subscriber Certificates: For CAs for which Google publishes a CRLs, that CRLs
is updates and reissues at least once every seven (7) days, and the value of the nextUpdate field is
not more than ten (10) days beyond the value of the thisUpdate field.
For the status of Subordinate CA Certificates: Google updates and reissues CRLs at least (i) once
every twelve (12) months and (ii) within 24 hours after revoking a Subordinate CA Certificate,
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 27
and the value of the nextUpdate field is not more than twelve months beyond the value of the
thisUpdate field.
See section 2.2 for CRL locations.
Google maintains sufficient resources to provide a response time for CRL and OCSP responses of
ten seconds or less under normal operating conditions.
Google makes available OCSP status information for all certificates it issues. The OCSP responder
locations are included in the respective certificates.
OCSP responses conform to RFC2560 and/or RFC5019. They are either:
1. Signed by the CA that issued the Certificates whose revocation status they indicate, or
2. Signed by an OCSP Responder whose Certificate is signed by the CA that issued the Cer-
tificate whose revocation status is indicated. The OCSP Responder’s signing Certificate
contains an extension of type id-pkix-ocsp-nocheck, as defined by RFC2560.
The OCSP responder supports GET method for receiving OCSP requests. It does not respond
with a “good” status on certificates which have not been issued.
For Subscriber Certificates, OCSP data is updated at least every four days, and has a maximum
expiration time of ten days.
For Subordinate CA Certificates, OCSP data is updated at least every twelve (12) months and
within 24 hours after revoking a Subordinate CA Certificate.
Not applicable.
In the case of a compromise of the private key used to sign certificates, Subscriber must immediately
notify Google that the Subscriber’s certificate has been compromised. Google will revoke the
concerned signing key, and publish a CRL to make relying parties aware that the certificates
issued off the signing key can no longer be trusted.
The subscriber is responsible for investigating the circumstances of any such compromise.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Revocation entries on a CRL or OCSP Response are not removed until after the Expiry Date of
the revoked Certificate.
Certificate Status Services are available 24x7, unless temporarily unavailable due to maintenance
or service failure. Additionally Google maintains a continuous 24x7 ability to respond internally
to high-priority Certificate Problem Reports.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 29
Not applicable.
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 30
Google CA systems are located in a selected set of locations which have been evaluated for their
physical security, as well as local legal considerations that may affect CA operations.
All CA systems are operated from buildings which are solidly constructed to prevent unauthorized
entry.
Google has in place appropriate physical security controls to restrict access to all hardware and
software used for providing CA Services. Access to such hardware and software is limited to
those personnel performing in a trusted role as described in Section 5.2.1. Access is controlled
through the use of electronic access controls, mechanical combination lock sets, deadbolts, or
other security mechanisms. Such access controls are manually or electronically monitored for
unauthorized intrusion at all times. Only authorized personnel will be allowed access, either
physical or logical, to the CA systems.
The Google CA servers are located inside of a locked cabinet or cage area in a locked server room.
Access to the server room is controlled by badge readers. The private keys for the CAs are stored
in hardware security modules that are validated to FIPS 140-2 Level 3 or higher and that are
physically tamper-evident and tamper-resistant.
Google CA facilities are equipped with uninterruptable power supply and air conditioning to ensure
reliable operations.
No stipulation.
No stipulation.
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 31
No stipulation.
Google takes reasonable steps to ensure that all media used for the storage of information such as
keys, Activation Data or its files are sanitized or destroyed before they are released for disposal.
Google maintains a backup facility for its CA infrastructure which also holds copies of the CA
private keys for redundancy. The backup facility has security controls which are equivalent to
those operated at the primary facility.
All personnel who have access to or control over cryptographic operations of a Google CA that
affect the issuance, use, and management of Certificates are considered as serving in a trusted role
(“Trusted Role”). Such personnel include, but are not limited to, members of Google’s Information
Security Team.
Google maintains controls to provide reasonable assurance that:
• A documented procedure for appointing individuals to Trusted Roles and assigning respon-
sibilities to them is followed;
• The responsibilities and tasks assigned to Trusted Roles are documented and “separation of
duties” for such Trusted Roles based on the risk assessment of the functions to be performed
is implemented;
• Only personnel assigned to Trusted Roles have access to Secure Zones and High Security
Zones;
• Individuals in a Trusted Role act only within the scope of such role when required for
performing administrative tasks;
• Employees and contractors observe the principle of “least privilege” when accessing, or when
configuring access privileges on, Certificate Systems;
• Trusted Roles use a unique credential created by or assigned to a single person for authenti-
cation to Certificate Systems;
• Where Trusted Roles use a username and a password to authenticate, access controls are
configured such that at a minimum they satisfy the following requirements:
– Passwords have at least twelve (12) characters for accounts not publicly accessible (ac-
cessible only within Secure Zones or High Security Zones);
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 32
– Passwords for accounts that are accessible from outside a Secure Zone or High Security
Zone are configured to have at least eight (8) characters, use a combination of at least
numeric and alphabetic characters, and may not be one of the user’s previous four
passwords; and implement account lockout for failed access attempts; OR
– Implement a documented password management and account lockout policy that the CA
has determined provide at least the same level of protection against password guessing
as the foregoing controls.
• Trusted Roles log out of or lock workstations when no longer in use;
• Workstations are configured with inactivity time-outs that log the user off or lock the work-
station after a set time of inactivity without input from the user;
• Review all system accounts at least every 90 days and deactivate any accounts that are no
longer necessary for operations;
• Revoke account access to Certificate Systems after no more than five (5) failed access at-
tempts, provided that this security measure is supported by the Certificate System and does
not weaken the security of this authentication control;
• Disable all privileged access of an individual to Certificate Systems within 24 hours upon
termination of the individual’s employment relationship with the CA;
• Enforce multi-factor authentication for administrator access to Issuing Systems and Certifi-
cate Management Systems;
• Restrict remote administration or access to an Issuing System, Certificate Management Sys-
tem, or Security Support System except when:
– The remote connection originates from a device owned or controlled by the CA and
from a pre-approved external IP address,
– The remote connection is through a temporary, non-persistent encrypted channel that
is supported by multi-factor authentication, and
– The remote connection is made to a designated intermediary device meeting the follow-
ing:
* Located within the CA’s network,
* Secured in accordance with these Requirements, and
* Mediates the remote connection to the Issuing System.
The Private Key can only be backed up, stored, and recovered by personnel in trusted roles using,
at least, dual control in a physically secured environment.
No stipulation.
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 33
Auditors of the infrastructure and certificate issuance are independent from the operators who
approve and issue certificates using a Google CA.
To review their conformance with applicable policies and procedures, Google CAs undergo annual
audits performed by independent auditors.
Google enforces appropriate personnel and management policies which are sufficient to provide
reasonable assurance that its personnel are competent and that they perform their duties in a
manner that is satisfactory and in accordance with this CPS.
All personnel operating the Google CAs are Google employees. Contractors or other third parties
will not be allowed to act in Trusted Roles maintaining a Google CA.
Google follows a set of established procedures for selecting and evaluating personnell who operate
Google CAs or act in other information security roles.
All Google personnel who perform information verification duties receive skills-training that covers
basic Public Key Infrastructure knowledge, authentication and vetting policies and procedures
(including this CPS), common threats to the information verification process including phishing
and other social engineering tactics.
Validation Specialists receive their skills-training prior to commencing their job role and Google
requires them to pass an examination on the applicable information verification requirements.
Google maintains records of such training and ensures that personnel entrusted with Validation
Specialist duties maintain an appropriate skill level.
Google requires personnel in Trusted Roles to maintain skill levels consistent with the CA training
and performance programs. To this end Google requires such personnel to undergo re-training at
least annually.
No Stipulation.
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 34
Google will impose sanctions, including suspension and termination if appropriate, on its employees
acting in Trusted Roles if they perform unauthorized acts, abuse their authority, or for other
appropriate reasons, at the discretion of the CA management.
Independent contractors must meet the same training requirements as Google employees. Inde-
pendent contractors will not be used in Trusted Roles.
Training and documentation is provided to Google employees as necessary for them to perform
competently in their job role.
Google records system and CA application events and creates certificate management logs from
the data collected in accordance with internal audit procedures. The following events are recorded:
• CA key lifecycle management events
– Key generation, backup, storage, recovery, archival and destruction;
– Cryptographic device lifecycle events.
• Applicant and Subscriber events
– Request to create a certificate;
– Request to revoke a certificate.
• CA and Subscriber Certificate lifecycle events
– Verification activities stipulated in the CP and this CPS;
– Acceptance and rejection of certificate requests, frequency of processing log;
– Key generation;
– Key compromise notification;
– Creation of a certificate;
– Delivery of a certificate;
– Revocation of a certificate;
– Generation of a Certificate Revocation List;
– Generation of an OCSP response.
• Actions by Trusted Personnel
– Login events and use of identification and authentication mechanisms;
– Changes to CA policies;
– Changes to CA keys;
– Configuration changes to the CA.
• Security Events
– Successful and unsuccessful PKI system access attempts;
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 35
Google retains any audit logs generated for at least seven years, or longer if required by law and
makes these audit logs available to its Qualified Auditor upon request.
Multiple copies of audit logs are stored in different locations and protected by appropriate physical
and logical access controls.
No stipulation.
No stipulation.
Events that are deemed potential security issues involving the Certificate Authority infrastructure
will be escalated to a permanent security monitoring team.
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 36
Google retains all documentation relating to certificate requests and the verification thereof, and
all Certificates and revocation thereof, for at least seven years after any Certificate based on that
documentation ceases to be valid, or longer as required by law.
A backup of archive information is maintained at a distinct, separate location with similar security
and availability requirements.
Backup and recovery procedures exist and can be utilized so that a complete set of backup copies
will be available in the event of the loss or destruction of the primary archives.
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 37
All archived records will be time-stamped by the CA’s normal logging facilities. Such time infor-
mation need not be cryptography-based.
No stipulation.
No stipulation.
If a disaster causes a Google CA to become inoperative, Google will re‐initiate its operations on
replacement hardware at a comparable, secured facility after ensuring the integrity and security of
the CA systems.
Google maintains an Incident Response Plan and a Disaster Recovery Plan, which set out the
procedures necessary to ensure business continuity, to notify affected stakeholders, and to reason-
ably protect Application Software, Suppliers, Subscribers, and Relying Parties in the event of a
disaster, security compromise, or business failure. Google annually tests, reviews, and updates its
business continuity plan and its security plans and makes them available to the its auditors upon
request.
The business continuity plan includes:
1. The conditions for activating the plan;
2. Emergency procedures;
3. Fallback procedures;
4. Resumption procedures;
5. A maintenance schedule for the plan;
6. Awareness and education requirements;
7. The responsibilities of the individuals;
8. Recovery time objective (RTO);
9. Regular testing of contingency plans;
10. A plan to maintain or restore the CA’s business operations in a timely manner following
interruption to or failure of critical business processes;
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 38
11. A requirement to store critical cryptographic materials (i.e., secure cryptographic device and
activation materials) at an alternate location;
12. A definition of acceptable system outage and recovery times;
13. The frequency at which backup copies of essential business information and software are
taken;
14. The distance of recovery facilities to the CA’s main site; and
15. Procedures for securing an affected facility following a disaster and prior to restoring a secure
environment either at the original or a remote site.
5.7.2. Recovery procedures if computing resources, software, and/or data are cor-
rupted
Google maintains a backup site in a remote location that mirrors its primary facility, so that if
any software or data is corrupted it can be restored from the backup site via a secure connection.
Backups of all relevant software and data are taken on a regular basis. They are stored off-site
and can be retrieved electronically when necessary.
In the event that the Private Key of a Google CA is compromised, Google will:
• Immediately cease using the compromised key material;
• Revoke all Certificates signed with the compromised key;
• Take commercially reasonable steps to notify all Subscribers of the Revocation; and
• Take commercially reasonable steps to cause all Subscribers to cease using, for any purpose,
any such Certificates.
Once the compromised key material has been replaced and a secure operation of the CA in question
has been established, the CA may re-issue the revoked certificates following the procedure for
initially providing the certificates.
Google employs and contracts security personnel who will use all reasonable means to monitor
the CA facility after a natural or other type of disaster so as to protect sensitive materials and
information against loss, additional damage, and theft.
To confirm that it posesses appropriate disaster recovery capabiliities, Google performs periodic
tests of its business continuity and disaster recovery plans.
5.8. CA or RA termination
When it is necessary to terminate operation a Google CA, the impact of the termination is to be
minimized as much as possible in light of the prevailing circumstances. This includes:
• Providing practicable and reasonable prior notice to all Subscribers;
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 39
• Assisting with the orderly transfer of service, and operational records, to a successor CA, if
any;
• Preserving all records for a minimum of one (1) year or as required by this CPS, whichever
is longer; and
• Revoking all Certificates issued by the CA no later than at the time of termination.
If commercially reasonable, prior notice of the termination of a Google CA will be given at least
3 months before the termination date.
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 40
Key Pairs for Google CAs are generated pursuant to formal key generation procedures and inside
of a FIPS 140-2 Level 3 certified Hardware Security Module from where the private key cannot be
extracted in plaintext.
Subscriber Key Pairs are generated (i) by the Subscriber by software supplied by their device
or operating system, (ii) by by a Google Service, or (iii) by an authorized member of Google’s
Information Security Team.
Key pairs for intermediate CAs are generated in accordance with the requirements set forth by
the corresponding root CA including any contractual obligations that might exist between Google
and the root CA.
If applicable, Private Keys are delivered to Subscribers in a secure manner in accordance with
applicable Google policy on transferring confidential information. Subscriber Private Keys are
encrypted for transport to the Subscriber.
Google does not archive Subscriber Private Keys.
Subscribers provide their public key to Google for certification through a PKCS#10 Certificate
Signing Request. The preferred transfer method for sending this information is HTTP over Secure
Sockets Layer (SSL).
The public keys of Google CAs are made available from the online repository at http://pki.goog/.
Additionally the public keys of Google root CAs are delivered through their inclusion into the root
programs of software and equipment manufacturers.
To prevent cryptanalytic attacks, all Google CAs use key sizes and cryptographic protocols which
adhere to NIST recommendations and to the applicable provisions of the CP.
For RSA keys, Google confirms that the value of the public exponent is an odd number equal to
3 or more.
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 41
6.1.7 Key usage purposes (as per X.509 v3. key usage field)
Root CA Private Keys are not used to sign Certificates except in the following cases:
1. Self-signed Certificates to represent the Root CA itself;
2. Certificates for Subordinate CAs and Cross Certificates;
3. Certificates for infrastructure purposes (e.g. administrative role certificates, internal CA op-
erational device certificates, and OCSP Response verification Certificates); and
4. Certificates issued solely for the purpose of testing products with Certificates issued by a
Root CA.
All CA private keys used to sign certificates, CRLs, or any related information leverage hardware
security modules meeting FIPS 140-2 Level 3 or higher and Common Criteria EAL4+ security
specifications. Cryptography leveraged to protect this information is selected to withstand crypt-
analytic attacks for the lifetime of the encrypted key.
CA Private Keys are kept in a physically secure location, and are never stored unencrypted outside
of Hardware Security Modules.
All Certificate Authority Key Pairs are generated in pre-planned key generation ceremonies. Upon
finalization of the ceremony, all individuals involved sign off on the successful completion of the
script, and thoroughly describe any exceptions that may have been applied in the process.
Records are maintained at least for the lifetime of the key pair.
Backups of CA Private Keys are stored in a secure manner in accordance with applicable Google
policy.
Private Keys belonging to Google CAs are not archived by parties other than Google.
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 42
Private Keys generated on behalf of a Subordinate CA are encrypted for transport to the Subor-
dinate CA.
All transfers of Private Keys into or from a cryptographic module are performed in accordance
with the procedures specified by the vendor of the relevant cryptographic module.
Private keys are stored in accordance with applicable instructions specified by the cryptographic
module manufacturer.
Private keys are activated in accordance with applicable instructions specified by the cryptographic
module manufacturer
Private keys are deactivated in accordance with applicable instructions specified by the crypto-
graphic module manufacturer.
Private Keys are destroyed in accordance with applicable instructions specified by the crypto-
graphic module manufacturer. In addition Google policy on destruction of highly confidential
information is followed.
No stipulation.
Certificates are valid starting at the moment of signing, unless otherwise specified in the certificate
validity structure, until the end noted in the certificate expiration time.
Subscriber certificates are issued for a period of one year or less.
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 43
No stipulation.
Hardware Security Module keys are stored in the Hardware Security Module, and can only be used
by authorized CA administrators upon authentication. Passphrases required to unlock the keys
are stored in an encrypted form. Physical activation data such as smart cards, when applicable,
are stored in a protected and secured environment.
No stipulation.
No stipulation.
Google uses software that has been formally tested for suitability and fitness for purpose. Hardware
is procured through a managed process leveraging industry-standard vendors.
Google has established an Information Security Organization which implements and operates a
framework of internal controls and comprises technical, organizational, and procedural measures.
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 44
System security management is controlled through the privileges assigned to the operating system
accounts of the CA infrastructure and by the Trusted Roles described in this CPS.
6.8. Time-stamping
All logs contain synchronized time stamps.
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 45
By issuing a Certificate, Google represents that it followed the procedure set forth in this CPS to
verify that, as of the issuance date, all of the Subject Information was accurate. Google does not
include a Domain Name in a Subject attribute except as specified in Section 3.2.5.1
Wildcard names may be used for wildcard certificates.
Google does not issue Certificates containing IP Addresses or Internal Names in the Subject Infor-
mation.
Google’s processes relating to I&A and Certificate issuance prevent an OU attribute from including
a name, DBA, tradename, trademark, address, location, or other text that refers to a specific natu-
ral person or Legal Entity unless this information has been verified this information in accordance
with Section 3.2 and the Certificate also contains subject:organizationName, subject:localityName,
and subject:countryName attributes, also verified in accordance with Section 3.2.2.1.
All attributes, when present within the subject field, contain information that has been verified.
SSL certificates may not contain metadata such as ‘.’, ‘‐’, and ‘’ (i.e. space) characters, and/or any
other indication that a value is absent, incomplete, or a field is not applicable.
No stipulation.
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 46
Google Certificates that comply with the CA/Browser Forum Baseline Requirements may include
the object identifier 1.3.6.1.4.1.11129.2.5.1 in their policy list.
Certificates that comply with the Organization Validated Policy defined in the CA/Browser Forum
Baseline Requirments may also include the 2.23.140.1.2.2 object identifier in the policy list.
No stipulation.
No stipulation.
No stipulation.
No stipulation.
No stipulation.
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 47
No stipulation.
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 48
8.7. Self-Audits
Google monitors its adherance to the CP and this CPS by performing self audits on at least a
quarterly basis against a randomly selected sample of the greater of one certificate or at least
three percent of the Certificates issued by it during the period commencing immediately after the
previous self-audit sample was taken.
Google requires all Subordinate CAs that it cross signs as well as all Delegated Third Parties to
undergo an annual audit which meets the criteria specified in section 8.1.
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 50
9.1. Fees
9.1.1. Certificate issuance or renewal fees
Google may charge Subscribers for the issuance, management and renewal of Certificates. Google
will never charge for the revocation of certificates it has issued.
Google may charge a reasonable fee for access to its Certificate databases.
Google does not charge a fee as a condition of making the CRLs required by this CPS available in a
Repository or otherwise available to Relying Parties. Google may however charge a fee for providing
customized CRLs, OCSP services, or other value-added revocation and status information services.
Google does not permit access to revocation information, Certificate status information, or time
stamping in its Repository by third parties that provide products or services that utilize such
Certificate status information without Google’s prior express written consent.
Google does not charge a fee for access to this CPS. Any use made for purposes other than simply
viewing the document, such as reproduction, redistribution, modification, or creation of derivative
works, shall be subject to a license agreement with Google.
No stipulation.
No stipulation.
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 51
No stipulation.
The following Applicant and Subscriber related information is considered confidential information.
1. Certificate applications;
2. Records submitted by the Applicant in support of Certificate applications;
3. Private keys;
4. Log files and other audit records;
5. Transaction records.
Certificates and revocation data is not considered confidential information. Furthermore infor-
mation is not considered confidential if its disclosure is mandated pursuant to the CP or this
CPS.
Google, its contractors and agents use a reasonable degree of care when processing and protecting
confidential information.
1. Right to Use Domain Name or IP Address: That, at the time of issuance, Google (i) im-
plemented a procedure for verifying that the Applicant either had the right to use, or had
control of, the domain name(s) and IP address(es) listed in the Certificate’s subject field and
subjectAltName extension (or, only in the case of domain names, was delegated such right or
control by someone who had such right to use or control); (ii) followed the procedure when
issuing the Certificate; and (iii) accurately described the procedure in this CPS;
2. Authorization for Certificate: That, at the time of issuance, Google (i) implemented a pro-
cedure for verifying that the Subject authorized the issuance of the Certificate and that the
Applicant is authorized to request the Certificate on behalf of the Subject; (ii) followed the
procedure when issuing the Certificate; and (iii) accurately described the procedure in this
CPS;
3. Accuracy of Information: That, at the time of issuance, Google (i) implemented a procedure
for verifying the accuracy of all of the information contained in the Certificate (with the
exception of the subject:organizationalUnitName attribute); (ii) followed the procedure when
issuing the Certificate; and (iii) accurately described the procedure in this CPS;
4. No Misleading Information: That, at the time of issuance, Google (i) implemented a pro-
cedure for reducing the likelihood that the information contained in the Certificate’s sub-
ject:organizationalUnitName attribute would be misleading; (ii) followed the procedure when
issuing the Certificate; and (iii) accurately described the procedure in this CPS;
5. Identity of Applicant: That, if the Certificate contains Subject identity information, Google
(i) implemented a procedure to verify the identity of the Applicant in accordance with Sec-
tions 3.1.1.1 and 3.2.2.1; (ii) followed the procedure when issuing the Certificate; and (iii)
accurately described the procedure in this CPS;
6. Subscriber Agreement: That, if Subscriber is not a Google Affiliate, the Subscriber and
Google are parties to a legally valid and enforceable Subscriber Agreement that satisfies the
requirements of this section, or, if Subscriber is a Google Affiliate, the Applicant acknowl-
edged and accepted Google’s Certificate terms of use, notice of which is provided by Google
to Applicant during the Certificate issuance process;
7. Status: Google maintains a 24 x 7 publicly-accessible Repository with current information
regarding the status (valid or revoked) of all unexpired Certificates; and
8. Revocation: Google will revoke the Certificate for any of the reasons specified in this CPS.
No stipulation.
Google requires, as part of the Subscriber Agreement or Terms of Use Agreement, that the Ap-
plicant make the commitments and warranties in this section for the benefit of the CA and the
Certificate Beneficiaries.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate, Google obtains, for its express benefit and that of the
Certificate Beneficiaries, either:
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 54
Relying Parties represent and warrant that: (a) they have read, understand and agree to this
CPS; (b) they have verified both the relevant Google CA’s Certificate and any other certificates
in the certificate chain using the relevant CRL or OCSP; (c) they will not use a Certificate if the
Certificate has expired or been revoked; (d) they have sufficient information to make an informed
decision as to the extent to which they choose to rely on the information in a Certificate; (e)
they have studied the applicable limitations on the usage of Certificates and agree to Google’s
limitations on liability related to the use of Certificates; (f) they are solely responsible for deciding
whether or not to rely on information in a Certificate; and (g) they are solely responsible for the
legal and other consequences of their failure to perform the Relying Party obligations in this CPS.
Relying Parties also represent and warrant that they will take all reasonable steps to minimize
the risk associated with relying on a digital signature, including only relying on a Certificate after
considering:
1. Applicable law and the legal requirements for identification of a party, protection of the
confidentiality or privacy of information, and enforceability of the transaction;
2. The intended use of the Certificate as listed in the Certificate or this CPS;
3. The data listed in the Certificate;
4. The economic value of the transaction or communication;
5. The potential loss or damage that would be caused by an erroneous identification or a loss of
confidentiality or privacy of information in the application, transaction, or communication;
6. The Relying Party’s previous course of dealing with the Subscriber;
7. The Relying Party’s understanding of trade, including experience with computer‐based meth-
ods of trade; and
8. Any other indicia of reliability or unreliability pertaining to the Subscriber and/or the appli-
cation, communication, or transaction.
No stipulation.
EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY STATED IN SECTION 9.6.1 OF THIS CPS, GOOGLE DOES NOT
WARRANT THAT ANY SERVICE OR PRODUCT WILL MEET ANY EXPECTATIONS OR
THAT ACCESS TO CERTIFICATES WILL BE TIMELY OR ERROR‐FREE.
Google does not guarantee the availability of any products or services and may modify or discon-
tinue any product or service offering at any time. A fiduciary duty is not created simply because
an individual or entity uses Google’s services.
9.9. Indemnities
9.9.1. By subscriber
No stipulation.
To the extent permitted by applicable law, Relying Parties shall indemnify Google for their: (a)
violation of any applicable law (b) breach of representations and obligations as stated in this CPS;
(c) reliance on a Certificate that is not reasonable under the circumstances; or (d) failure to check
the status of such Certificate to determine if the Certificate is expired or revoked.
The CPS becomes effective upon publication in the Repository. Amendments to this CPS become
effective upon publication in the Repository.
9.10.2. Termination
This CPS and any amendments remain in effect until replaced by a newer version.
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 57
Upon termination of this CPS, Participants are nevertheless bound by its terms for all Certificates
issued for the remainder of the validity periods of such Certificates.
9.12. Amendments
9.12.1. Procedure for amendment
Google may change this CPS at any time in its sole discretion and without prior notice to Sub-
scribers or Relying Parties. The CPS and any amendments thereto are available in the Repository.
Amendments to this CPS will be evidenced by a new version number and date, except where the
amendments are purely clerical.
Google may provide additional notice (such as in the Repository or on a separate website) in the
event that it makes any material changes to its CPS. Google is responsible for determining what
constitutes a material change of the CPS. Google does not guarantee or set a notice‐and‐comment
period.
No stipulation.
No stipulation.
9.16.2. Assignment
Relying Parties and Subscribers may not assign their rights or obligations under this CPS, by
operation of law or otherwise, without Google’s prior written approval. Any such attempted
assignment shall be void. Subject to the foregoing, this CPS shall be binding upon and inure to
the benefit of the parties hereto, their successors and permitted assigns.
9.16.3. Severability
If any provision of this CPS shall be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, the validity,
legality, or enforceability of the remainder of this CPS shall not in any way be affected or impaired
hereby.
Google may seek indemnification and attorneys’ fees from a party for damages, losses, and expenses
related to that party’s conduct. Google’s failure to enforce a provision of this CPS does not waive
Google’s right to enforce the same provision later or right to enforce any other provision of this
CPS. To be effective, waivers must be in writing and signed by Google.
Google shall not be liable for any default or delay in the performance of its obligations hereunder
to the extent and while such default or delay is caused, directly or indirectly, by fire, flood, earth-
quake, elements of nature or acts of God, acts of war, terrorism, riots, civil disorders, rebellions or
revolutions in the United States, strikes, lockouts, or labor difficulties or any other similar cause
beyond the reasonable control of Google.
Google PKI: The Google Public Key Infrastructure established, operated and maintained by
Google for publicly trusted certificates.
Identification and Authentication (I&A): The process for ascertaining and confirming
through appropriate inquiry and investigation the identity and authority of a person or entity.
See Section 3.2
Incorporating Agency: The government agency in the jurisdiction in which an entity is incorpo-
rated under whose authority the legal existence of the entity was established (e.g., the government
agency that issued the Certificate of Incorporation).
Information Security Team: Google employees who belong to the Privacy & Security organi-
zation.
Internal Name: A string of characters (not an IP address) in a Common Name or Subject
Alternative Name field of a Certificate that cannot be verified as globally unique within the public
DNS at the time of certificate issuance because it does not end with a Top Level Domain registered
in IANA’s Root Zone Database.
Key Pair: Two mathematically related numbers, referred to as a Public Key and its corresponding
Private Key, possessing properties such that: (i) the Public Key may be used to verify a Digital
Signature generated by the corresponding Private Key; and/or (ii) the Public Key may be used to
encrypt an electronic record that can be decrypted only by using the corresponding Private Key.
Legal Entity: An association, corporation, partnership, proprietorship, trust, government entity
or other entity with legal standing in a country’s legal system.
NIST: (US Government) National Institute of Standards and Technology
OCSP: Online Certificate Status Protocol
OID: Object Identifier
Operational Period: The intended term of validity of a Google Certificate, including beginning
and ending dates. The Operational Period is indicated in the Certificate’s “Validity” field. See
also Expire.
Participants: The persons authorized to participate in the Google PKI, as identified in Section
1.3. This term includes the Google CAs, and each Subscriber and Relying Party operating under
the authority of the Google PKI.
Private Key: The key of a Key Pair that must be kept secret by the holder of the Key Pair, and
that is used to generate digital signatures and/or to decrypt electronic records that were encrypted
with the corresponding Public Key.
Public Key: The key of a Key Pair that is intended to be publicly shared with recipients of
digitally signed electronic records and that is used by such recipients to verify Digital Signatures
created with the corresponding Private Key and/or to encrypt electronic records so that they can
be decrypted only with the corresponding Private Key.
Public Key Cryptography: A type of cryptography, also known as asymmetric cryptography,
that uses a unique Key Pair in a manner such that the Private Key of that Key Pair can decrypt
an electronic record encrypted with the Public Key, or can generate a digital signature, and the
corresponding Public Key, to encrypt that electronic record or verify that Digital Signature.
Public Key Infrastructure (PKI): A set of hardware, software, people, procedures, rules,
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 61
policies, and obligations used to facilitate the trustworthy creation, issuance, management, and
use of Certificates and keys based on Public Key Cryptography.
Qualified Auditor: A natural person or Legal Entity that meets the requirements of Section 8.2.
RA: See Registration Authority.
Registration Authority (RA): An entity that is responsible for identification and authentication
of certificate subjects, but that does not sign or issue certificates (i.e., an RA is delegated certain
tasks on behalf of a CA). A role within the Google PKI that administers the Registration Process
and processes requests for Certificate Reissuance and Revocation.
Registration Process: The process, administered by the CA or an RA, that a Subscriber uses
to apply for and obtain a Google Certificate.
Reissuance: The process of acquiring a new Google Certificate and associated Key Pair to replace
an existing Google Certificate and associated Key Pair, prior to the Expiration of the existing
Google Certificate and associated Key Pair’s Operational Period.
Relying Party: A recipient of a Certificate who acts in reliance on the Certificate and/or digital
signatures verified using the Certificate.
Repository: An online accessible database in the Google PKI containing this CPS, the CRL for
revoked Google Certificates, and any other information specified by Google.
Revocation: The process of requesting and implementing a change in the status of a Certificate
from valid to Revoked.
Revoked: A Certificate status designation that means the Certificate has been rendered perma-
nently Invalid.
Subject: The individual or organization named in a Certificate’s “Subject” field.
Subscriber: The individual or organization that is named as the Subject of a Certificate and that
has agreed to the terms of a Subscriber Agreement with Google.
Subscriber Agreement: The contract between Google and a Subscriber whereby the Subscriber
agrees to the terms required by this CPS with respect to each Certificate issued to the Subscriber
and naming the Subscriber as the Subject.
TLS: Transport Layer Security
Token: A hardware device (such as a smart card) used to store a Key Pair and associated
Certificate and to perform cryptographic functions.
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 62
Root CA Certificate
Field Content
issuer Matches subject
validity:not after Less or equal to 25 years after the certificate was issued
or the validity:notBefore date – whichever is later.
subject Contains countryName, organizationName and
commonName
extension:subjectKeyIdentifier TBD
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 64
Field Content
extension:basicConstraints TBD
extension:keyUsage digitalSignature, keyCertsign and cRLSign are set,
other bits are not set
Subordinate CA Certificate
Field Content
validity:not after Not later than notAfter date of signing certificate
subject Contains countryName, organizationName and
commonName
extension:subjectKeyIdentifier TBD
extension:authorityKeyIdentifier Matches subjectKeyIdentifier of signing certificate;
authorityCertIssuer and authorityCertSerialNumber not
present
extension:certificatePolicies contains at least one policyIdentifier are set, other bits
are not set
extension:basicConstraints cA is TRUE
extension:keyUsage digitalSignature, keyCertsign, and cRLSign bits are set,
all other bits are not set
extension:keyUsage digitalSignature, keyCertsign, and cRLSign bits are set,
all other bits are not set
extension:authorityInfoAccess TBD
extension:authorityInfoAccess contains at least one DistributionPoint containing a
fullName of type uniformResourceIdentifier
Field Content
validity:not after Not later than notAfter date of signing certificate
subject Contains countryName, organizationName and
commonName
extension:subjectKeyIdentifier TBD
extension:authorityKeyIdentifier Matches subjectKeyIdentifier of signing certificate;
authorityCertIssuer and authorityCertSerialNumber
not present
extension:certificatePolicies not maked critical, contains at least one
policyIdentifier
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 65
Field Content
extension:basicConstraints optional. if present: cA is FALSE
extension:authorityInfoAccess not marked critical, contains at least one
DistributionPoint containing a fullName of type
uniformResourceIdentifier of the issuing CA’s OCSP
responder
policyQualifiers:policyQualifierId optional. if present: id‐qt 1 RFC 5280
extension:cRLDistributionPoints not marked critical, contains HTTP URL of CRL
service
extension:keyUsage (optional) bit positions for keyCertSign and cRLSign not set
extension:extkeyUsage Either the value id‐kp‐serverAuth RFC 5280 or
id‐kp‐clientAuth RFC 5280 or both values present.
id‐kp‐emailProtection RFC 5280 may be present.
Other values should not be present.
Google Trust Services, Certification Practice Statement v1.0 66