Organising Function - Day
Organising Function - Day
1
Structure
DEFINITION
PRINCIPLES OF ORGANISING
IMPORTANCE
ORGANISING PROCESS
ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURES
AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY
8-2
DEFINITION OF ORGANISING
• The process of arranging people and other resources to work
together to accomplish a goal
• It involves coordinating human and other material resources.
• The process by which managers establish working relationships
among employees to achieve goals.
The functions of Organizing
4
Principles/Concepts of Organizing
Organizing is one of the major functions of
management. It is performed by all mangers and it
is a continuous process.
The principle of organizing has to do with the
grouping of organizational activities into various
units and dividing responsibility and authority
accordingly. Some of the widely practiced principles
are as follows:
•Objective: The goals and objectives
must be clearly defined for the entire
organization for each department and
even for each position in the organization
structure.
Once the objectives have been clearly
defined, organizing function become
easier.
PRINCIPLES /CONCEPTS OF ORGANISING
• Work specialization/ Departmentalization - where
activities are divided into specialized groups referred to as departments for the
purpose of specializing activities to simplify tasks of managers.
Unity of command - states that an employee should have one and only one
supervisor to whom he or she is directly responsible.
PRINCIPLES /CONCEPTS OF ORGANISING
Scalar Principle - refers to a clearly defined line of authority that
includes all employees in the organization i.e. a clear and unbroken
chain of command linking every person in the organization
Informal structures
– A “shadow” organization made up of the unofficial, but often critical,
working relationships between organization members.
– Potential advantages of informal structures:
• Helping people accomplish their work.
• Gaining access to interpersonal networks.
• Informal learning.
FORMS OF FORMAL ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES
Functional structures
People with similar skills and performing similar tasks are grouped together
into formal work units normally departments
Members work in their functional areas of expertise.
Board of Directors
Chief Executive
22
FORMS OF FORMAL ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURES
Divisional structures
– Group together people who work on the same
product or process, serve similar customers, and/or
are located in the same area or geographical region.
– Common in complex organizations.
– Avoid problems associated with functional structures.
Product,
customer/
Market and
Geographic
Structures
EXAMPLE ONE
10-24
Divisional structures based on product, geography, customer,
and process.
Management - Chapter 10
25
Product Organization
Advantages Disadvantages
• Facilitates coordination • Requires management
• Encourages management talents
development • Technical obsolescence
• Provides for decentralization of specialists
• Promotes growth • Changes take time to
effect
26
DIVISONAL/GEOGRAPHICAL STRUCTURES
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
• More flexibility in responding Duplication of resources and
to environmental changes efforts across divisions.
• Improved coordination. Competition and poor
• Clear points of responsibility coordination across divisions.
• Expertise focused on specific Emphasis on divisional goals at
customers, products, and expense of organizational goals.
regions. Inconsistency in standards may
• Greater ease in restructuring. develop in different locations
Advantages of Divisional Structures - continued
• Accountability becomes easy- very simple to identify managers
responsible for success and failure particular products, locations,
customers and different processes.
• Division managers become experts in their area
• Removes need for direct supervision of division by corporate
managers
• Divisional management improves the use of resources
• Its cheaper to establish local factories /offices than to service
markets in one location
Forms of Formal Organizational Structures
Matrix structure
– Combines functional and divisional structures to gain advantages and minimize
disadvantages of each.
– Common in organizations that use team and project work (have teams and projects)
– Creates dual authority – where an employee reports to two immediate bosses
– Used in:
• Manufacturing
• Service industries
• Professional fields
• Non-profit sector
• Multi-national corporations
Matrix structure Organizational Chart
Management - Chapter 10
30
MATRIX ORGANISATIONAL
STRUCTURES
DISADVANTAGES
ADVANTAGES
• Two-boss system is susceptible
• Better cooperation across functions
to power struggles
• Improved decision making – Two-boss system can create task
• Increased flexibility in restructuring confusion and conflict in work
• Better customer service priorities.
• Better performance accountability • Team meetings are time
• Improved strategic management consuming
– Team may develop “groupitis.”
Factors To Consider when Developing Organizational
Structures
Environment
Determine design
Strategy or organizational Technology
structure
Human
Resources
Determinants of Structure
The environment: Fast-changing environments require flat
structures; slowly changing environments favor tall structures.
• Structure must be more flexible when environmental change is
rapid.
– Usually need to decentralize authority.
Strategy: Different strategies require the use of different structures.
• A differentiation strategy needs a flexible structure, low cost may
need a more formal structure.
• Increased vertical integration or diversification also requires a
more flexible structure.
Technology
Small Batch Technology: produces small quantities of one-of-a-kind
products.
• Based on the skills of the workers who need a flexible (flat) structure.
Mass Production Technology: automated machines make high
volumes of standard products.
• Workers perform repetitive tasks so a formal (strict) - tall structure works
well.
Continuous Process Technology: totally mechanized systems of
automatic machines.
• Workers must watch for unexpected problems and react quickly. A flexible
structure is needed here.
Determinants of Structure
Human Resources: the final factor affecting organizational structure.
• Higher skilled workers who need to work in teams usually need a more flexible
structure.
• Higher skilled workers often have professional norms (CPA’s, physicians).
• Authority may be defined as the right to give orders and the power to
exert influence or the power to make decisions which affect or guide the
actions of others
• Authority may never be effective unless accepted.
• Influence; Actions that cause changes in behaviour or attitude of others
directly or indirectly
• Power is the ability to exert influence
Sources /Types of Power
Reward
Power
Legitimate Coercive
Power Power
Enable managers to be
leaders & influence
subordinates to
achieve goals
Expert
Referent
Power Power
Sources of Power
– Legitimate Power: manager’s authority resulting by their
management position in the firm.
• Can be power to hire/fire workers, assign work.
– Reward Power: based on the manager’s ability to give or
withhold rewards.
• Pay raises, bonuses, verbal praise.
• Effective managers use reward power to signal employees they are doing
a good job.
Sources of Power
– Coercive Power: based in ability to punish others.
• Ranges from verbal reprimand to pay cuts to firing.
• Can have serious negative side effects.
– Expert Power: based on special skills of leader.
• First & middle managers have most expert power.
• Often found in technical ability.
– Referent Power: results from personal characteristics of the leader
which earn worker’s respect, loyalty and admiration.
• Usually held by likable managers who are concerned about their workers.
RESPONSIBILTY AND ACCOUNTABILITY
• Authority goes with responsibility
• Responsibility is the obligation to use authority to get things
done.
• Responsibility requires those with authority to account for it. Authority
must be used as expected.
• Accountability is the evaluation of how authority has been used.
• To have authority means accepting responsibility and being accounted
for.
DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY
6/25/2021 48