Scribd
Upload
9 views1 page

Science Lab-Rep-Rubric 2223

The laboratory report rubric outlines criteria for evaluating reports across five categories: Abstract, Introduction, Methodology, Results and Discussion, Conclusion, and References. Each category is graded on a scale from Exceptional to Novice, with specific point ranges and descriptions for performance levels. The rubric emphasizes the importance of clarity, completeness, and proper citation in scientific reporting.

Uploaded by

zach.d.dulnuan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
9 views1 page

Science Lab-Rep-Rubric 2223

The laboratory report rubric outlines criteria for evaluating reports across five categories: Abstract, Introduction, Methodology, Results and Discussion, Conclusion, and References. Each category is graded on a scale from Exceptional to Novice, with specific point ranges and descriptions for performance levels. The rubric emphasizes the importance of clarity, completeness, and proper citation in scientific reporting.

Uploaded by

zach.d.dulnuan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

LABORATORY REPORT RUBRIC

Exceptional Proficient Competent Novice


Incomplete
Main objective, main Refers to most of the Incorrectly discussed
discussion of main
results and major points but some the main objective,
objective, main
discussion, general minor details are main results and
results and
Abstract conclusion, and missing or not clearly discussion, general
discussion, general
recommendations are explained conclusion, and
conclusion, and
stated properly recommendations
(11-15 points) recommendations
(16-20 points) (1-4 points)
(5-10 points)
Is nearly complete but
Accurately and Incomplete or
does not provide
thoroughly discussed Discussed some of the incorrectly discussed
context for minor
Introduction the concept behind concept behind the the concept behind the
points. Contains
the experiment done experiment done experiment
relevant information
with proper citations (1-2 points)
but fails to provide (3-5 points)
(9-10 points)
background for one
aspect of the
experiment or certain
information is not
cohesive.
(6-8 points)
Accurately discussed discussed the Incomplete discussion Incorrectly discussed
the methodology methodology clearly of the methodology the methodology done
Methodology done in the in the experiment but done in the in the experiment
experiment lacks relevant pieces experiment (1-2 points)
(9-10 points) of information (3-5 points)
(6-8 points)
Accurately identified Identified the results
and justified the from the experiment to Discussion is relevant Incorrectly or
results from the the concept with to the results of incomplete relevant
Results and
experiment to the proper citations but concept with proper discussion of results
Discussion
concept with proper lacks justification in citations to concept
citations error. (9-15 points) (1-8 points)
(24-30 points) (16-23 points)
Completely discussed Is nearly complete but
how the objectives does not provide Discussed the Objectives of the
were met for the context for minor objectives met for the experiment were not
Conclusion
experiment and the points in discussing the experiment discussed
concept behind it objective. (5-10 points) (1-4 points)
(16-20 points) (11-15 points)
Completely sited Most sited references No references were
Sited references used
references in proper in proper APA used in creating the
References in the paper
APA format Format laboratory report (0-2
(3-5 points)
(9-10 points) (6-8 points) points)

You might also like