Unit IV Prof Ed 8
Unit IV Prof Ed 8
In this unit, you will acquaint yourself in the concepts of Assessment in the Affective Domain. It describes
a number of non-cognitive variables such as person’s attitude, interests, and values. The importance of
affective targets, affective traits, and learning targets as well as affective domain of the taxonomy of
educational objectives will also be discussed.
Objectives:
At the end of this module, you should be able to:
a. recognize the affective taxonomy in the educational objectives;
b. craft affective learning outcomes for the different levels in the affective domain; and
c. develop instruments for assessing affective learning.
In 1964, David R. Krathwohl, together with his colleagues, extended Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational
Objectives by publishing the second taxonomy of objectives, this time giving emphasis on the affective
domain. The affective domain refers to the way in which we deal with situations emotionally such as
feelings, appreciation, enthusiasm, motivation, values, and attitudes.
Responding Concerned with responses that go beyond merely Student gives special
attending to phenomena. Students are sufficiently attention to the discussion of
motivated that they are not just “willing to attend” mathematics lesson to be
but are actively attending. able to answer the activities.
Characterization Internalization has taken place in an individual’s Student applies the lessons
by Value value hierarchy to the extent that he or she can be learned in mathematics in
characterized as holding a particular value or set of daily activities/real-life
values. scenario.
Below are the sample behavioral verbs appropriate for the affective domain.
As teachers, you should encourage students to not just receive information at the bottom of the affective
hierarchy. Instead, encourage them to respond to what they learn, to value it, to organize it, and even to
characterize it.
The affective domain is the least studied and most often overlooked domain in educational literature despite
the fact that almost every researcher or author begins with a premise on the importance of the affective
domain in the teaching-learning process. The reason, perhaps, is the fact that affective domain is the most
imprecise and the hardest to evaluate among Bloom’s three domains. Traditional assessment procedures,
for instance, concentrate on the cognitive aspects of learning and as teachers, majority of us typically focus
our efforts on the development of tasks and instruments for measuring cognitive learning. However, it is
important to realize that by tapping the potentials of the affective domain in enhancing learning, we increase
the likelihood of real and authentic learning among our students.
Similarly, students may experience affective roadblocks to learning that can neither be recognized nor
solved with using a purely cognitive approach.
The purpose of objectives is not to restrict spontaneity or constraint the vision of education in the
discipline; but to ensure that learning is focused clearly enough that both students and teacher know
what is going on, and so learning can be objectively measured. Different archers have different styles,
so do different teachers. Thus, you can shoot your arrows (objectives) in many ways. The important
thing is that they reach your target (goals) score the bulls eye!
In the affective domain, and in particular, when we consider learning competencies, we also consider the
following concepts:
1. Attitudes- are defined as a mental predisposition to act that is expressed by evaluating a particular
entity with some degree of favor or disfavor. Individuals generally have attitudes that focus on objects,
people, or institutions. Attitudes are also attached to mental categories. Mental orientations towards
concepts are generally referred to as values. Attitudes are comprised of four components:
a. Cognitions - beliefs, theories, expectancies, cause-and effect beliefs, and perceptions relative to the
focal object; not the same as “feelings”
b. Affect - refers to our feelings with respect to the focal object such as fear, liking, or anger.
c. Behavioral Intentions – refers to goals, aspirations, and our expected response to the attitude object.
d. Evaluation – central component of attitudes; consists of the imputation of some degree of goodness or
badness to an attitude object.
2. Motivation. A reason or set of reasons for engaging in a particular behavior, especially human behavior
as studied in psychology and neuropsychology. According to Geen, R.G. (1995), motivation refers to
the initiation, direction, intensity, and persistence of human behavior.
The Need Theory (Abraham Maslow Hierarchy of Human Needs). One of the theories that explain human
motivation. It can be summarized as follows:
Human beings have wants and desires which influence their behavior; only unsatisfied needs can
influence behavior, satisfied needs cannot.
Arranged in order of importance, from the basic to the complex.
The person advances to the next level of needs only after the lower need is at least minimally satisfied.
The further the progress up the hierarchy, the more individuality, humanness and psychological health
a person will show.
The Two-Factor Theory by Frederick Herzberg. One of the theories that explain human motivation. He
stated that certain factors in the workplace result in job satisfaction while others do not, but if absent lead
to dissatisfaction. He distinguished between:
Motivators (challenging work, recognition, responsibility- positive satisfaction
Hygiene factors (status, job security, salary and fringe benefits) which do not motivate if present, but
if absent will result in demotivation.
The ERG Theory (Existence, Relatedness, and Growth) by Clayton Alderfer. He expanded the Maslow’s
hierarchy of needs.
Trait Description
Attitudes Predisposition to respond favorably or unfavorably to specific
situations, concepts, objects, institutions, or persons
Student self-report
Student interview- there is an opportunity that teachers may have direct involvement with the
students wherein teachers can probe and respond for better understanding.
Surveys and questionnaires- there are two types of using survey and questionnaires: the
constructed response, in which is a straightforward approach asking the students about their affect
by responding to simple statement of question; the selected-response, in which students can choose
from options, thus ensuring anonymity.
Peer Ratings
It is the least common method in assessing affect because students may not take this seriously. However,
the teachers can accurately have observed what is being assessed in peer ratings since teachers also engage
with the students.
a. Checklist - contain criteria that focus on the intended outcome or target. It helps students in
organizing the tasks assigned to them into logically sequenced steps that will lead to successful
completion of the task.
b. Rating Scale - helps students understand the learning target/outcomes and to focus students’
attention to performance. It gives feedback to students as far as their strengths and weaknesses with
respect to the targets to which they are measured. Students not only learn the standards but also
may internalize the set standards. In addition, ratings help to show each student’s growth and
progress.
c. Likert Scale - It is a list of clearly favorable and unfavorable attitude statements. The students are
tasked to respond to each of the statement that usually uses a five-point scale: Strongly Agree,
Agree, Undecided, Disagree, Strongly Disagree.
d. Semantic Differential Scale - This uses adjective pairs that provide anchors for feelings or beliefs
that are opposite in direction and intensity. Students would place a check between each pair of
adjectives that describes positive or negative aspects of the trait.
References
Cajigal, R. and Mantuano, M.L. (2014). Assessment of Learning 2. Quezon City: Adriana Publishing Co.
Inc.
Navarro, R. and Santos, R. (2013). Authentic Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes Assessment 2
(2nd Edition). Quezon City: Lorimar Publishing Inc.
KFP