Module 5
Module 5
HYDROLOGY
MODULE 5: LOSSES FROM PRECIPITATION
EXAMPLE 1:
SOLUTIONS:
Since the depth of interception by a GI roof is given to
be 1mm, the volume of interception is given as follows:
mm 2 3
1 ∗65m =0.065m
1000
SOLUTIONS: SOLUTIONS:
Since the depth of interception by tree canopy is given The depression loss for clayey soil is 2.5mm
to be 0.5mm, the volume of interception is given as
follows: The volume of the depression storage is given to be:
2
0.5 mm 10000m mm 3
∗7 ha∗ =35m 3 2.5 ∗2.1 ha∗10000=52.5m
1000 1 ha 1000
Compare that to the volume of rainfall, we have the The depression loss are affected by the following:
following: • Rainfall Intensity
• Type Soil
5 mm 10000m
2 • Antecedent Moisture Condition
∗7 ha∗ =350m 3
1000 1 ha
One major process of rainfall abstraction is
The amount of 35m3 that were intercepted comprises Evaporation. This is the conversion of liquid into vapor.
the water intercepted by the leaves of the trees alone.
Once the rest of the water came down of the canopy, Evaporation can be quantified as follows:
other abstractions or losses will occur such as • Direct Measurement
infiltration and evapotranspiration. • Indirect or Empirical Measurement
The next form of precipitation losses is Depression Direct measurement of evaporation usually involves
storage. Depressions storage occurs when the surface the use of pans. The following types of pan are given
is low and water will congregate to the low areas of the below:
surface where it ponds. The ponding of water occurs • USWB Class A pan – evaporation from dry lands
because it moves in at a much faster rate than what • Colorado sunken pan – evaporation for dry lands
the soil can absorb but the surface is low enough to • USGS floating pan – evaporation on lakes and
prevent runoff. streams
( )
bureau) u9
E= 1+ C (e s −e )
16
EXAMPLE 4:
E is in mm/day
U9 = wind speed measured at 9m above the surfaces
A USWB Class A pan was placed in the middle of a
in km/hr
farm. (C = 0.78) and at 7AM, the pan was filled to the
es - saturation vapor pressure in mmHg (see module
required depth. The following measurements were
2)
made for the rest of the day.
e – vapor pressure in mmHg (see module 2)
C – Meyer’s coefficient
Time Depth Depth If water depth is more than 6m; C = 0.36
Note:
(in) (mm) If water depth is less than 6m; C = 0.50
If the water level
0700 8” 200.00 reaches below 7”,
the pan must be Penman’s Equation:
1030 7.5” 187.50 E=0.89 ( 1+0.015 U 2 )(e s −e )
refilled back to 8”
1430 6.75” 168.75 E is in mm/day
1700 7.75 193.75 U2 = wind speed measured at 2m above the surfaces
in km/hr
es - saturation vapor pressure in mmHg (see module
SOLUTIONS: 2)
e – vapor pressure in mmHg (see module 2)
The amount of evaporation is tallied as follows:
The wind speed is obtained using the 7th power rule. It
200mm – 168.75mm = 31.25mm is recalled in hydraulics that the velocity particle within
a conduit is given to be:
This was taken from the measured pan water depth
from 7:00AM to 2:30PM. Since at 2:30PM the water
( )
1
U0 ro n
elevation is less than 7inches, it has to be refilled back =
to 8inches as soon as possible (after recording). Ur rr
Therefore at the next recording (5:00PM) the following
measurements are taken: since it is generally assumed that the atmosphere is
like a conduit and the friction of air will yield a value of
200mm – 193.75mm = 6.25mm n to be 7, hence the 7th power rule.
The total evaporation loss from the pan is then taken to To determine the wind speed at 2m from the surface
be
( 2hm )
1
U 2=U h 7
(for use in penman equation)
31.25mm + 6.25mm = 37.50mm
Since the pan tends to absorb a lot of heat, the actual To determine the wind speed at 9m from the surface
pan loss must be multiplied to a coefficient which is the equation is then transformed to:
unique to each pan and therefore:
( 9hm )
1
E=P e C U 9=U h 7
(for use in meyers equation)
EXAMPLE 5:
760 mmHg
4006.989 Pa∗ =30.062 mmHg
Determine the evaporation at Lake Palakpakin in San 101300Pa
Pablo, Laguna for the month of august given its depth
of 2.5m and the average daily temp for the month of Recall also that the relationship between the saturation
august to be 320C vapor pressure, vapor pressure and the relative
humidity is given to be
SOLUTIONS:
From the question it is determined that the required e
RH= ∗100
amount of evaporation is for the whole month of august es
and the applicable method for computing the
evaporation is the USBR method Given that the relative humidity is 80%, the vapor
pressure can be computed to be
E=0.833 ( 4.37 T m+ 43.3 )
e
80= ∗100 ; e = 24.0496mmHg
Given that the average monthly temperature for the 30.062 mmHg
month of august to be 320C, the monthly evaporation
can be computed as follows: The wind speed at 2m and 9m above the lake surface
is then computed using the 7th power rule.
E=0.833 [ 4.37(32 C)+43.3 ]
0
( )
1
2m
U 2=U h 7
E = 152.56mm/mo h
( ) ( ) =15.343 km
1 1
2m km 2 m
Laguna de Bay has an average depth of 2m. If the U 2=U 18 7
; U 2=21 7
18 hr 18 hr
average daily temperature is 290C and the wind speed
is recorded to be 21kph as measured 18m from the
( 918m ) ( )
1 1
surface of the lake. If the average daily humidity is 80% km 9 m km
U 9=U 18 7
; U 9=21 m 7 =19.02
determine the daily evaporation using hr 18 hr
e s=611 e 237.3 +T
E=0.89 ( 1+0.015 U 2 )(e s −e )
FJULY = 19.763 cm
Month F (cm)
July 19.763
Aug 19.687
Sep 18.839
Oct 18.416
The crop water requirement for the month of July is While infiltration is considered a loss in surface
taken to be hydrology, it is considered as input in groundwater
hydrology. Infiltration is measured directly and by
PETJULY = 19.763cm*1.1 = 21.739cm empirical models.
For the rest of the months, the following are obtained. Direct measurement of Infiltration is done using
infiltrometers. There are two kinds of infiltrometers
PETAUG = 19.687cm*1.1 = 21.656cm available for use:
1. Single tube Infiltrometer
PETSEP = 18.839cm*1.1 = 20.723cm 2. Double Ring Infiltrometer
One disadvantage of the single tube infiltrometer is that Time (min) 30 50 80 120 150
it allows for the rapid movement of water at the bottom
specially during dry season and also for sandy soil. Cumulative
900 1040 1190 1280 1343
This gives a higher infiltration rate during the early part Vol (cm3)
of the experiment.
Plot the infiltration capacity curve and determine the
Another disadvantage with respect to single tube constant rate of infiltration
infiltrometer is its length makes it difficult to be installed
in soils without disturbing the surrounding layer (50cm SOLUTIONS:
penetration is not easy to do specially in loamy,
gravelly and clayey soil. taking the area of infiltrometer to be:
Area= π (30cm) =706.86 cm2
3
10cm GROUNDLINE from the given, the volume added into the infiltrometer
5cm as well as the depth of water can be taken as follows:
Time Time Cum. Depth of Increment
(min) increment Volume water Depth
15cm (min) added added (cm)
(cm3 or ml) (cm)
[(3)/Area]
30cm (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Double ring infiltrometers were developed for the 0 0 0 0 0
purpose of 2 2 130 0.1839 0.1839
1. Easing the installation process in soils (0.15m
penetrations vs 0.5m penetration) 5 3 280 0.3961 0.2122
2. The presence of surrounding water around the 10 5 510 0.7215 0.3254
inner tube allows for the saturation of the
surrounding soil and thus ensuring that the water in 20 10 680 0.9620 0.2405
the inner tube will go down along vertically only 30 10 900 1.2732 0.3112
which ensures that the recorded infiltration rate is
coming from the actual vertical movement of water 50 20 1040 1.4713 0.1981
along the soil. 80 30 1190 1.6835 0.2122
Just like the single tube infiltrometer, the double tube or 120 40 1280 1.8108 0.1273
double ring infiltrometer also requires that water to be 150 30 1343 1.9000 0.0891
maintained at the 5cm level. The time from the first
refill to the subsequent refill must be recorded along
The increment depth (5) will then be divided with the
with the volume of refilling.
time increment (2) in order to get the infiltration rate in
cm/min and subsequently converting it to mm/hr
Similarly, just like in single tube infiltrometer, it will be
noticed that the volume added to maintain the depth to
5cm will decrease over time. This will denote the
saturation of the soil for as the water is saturated, it will
absorb water very slowly. It should be remembered
Time Increment Infiltration rate Infiltration rate In 1933, Horton expressed the decay of the infiltration
increment Depth (cm) (cm/min) (mm/hr) capacity to be
−K t
(min) [(5)/(2)] [(6)*10*60] f p =f c + (f 0 −f c ) e
h
10 0.2405 0.0241 14.4300 The Horton’s equation relies on the data of the
10 0.3112 0.0311 18.6741 infiltration graph in order to develop the equation
20 0.1981 0.0099 5.9418 Another equation for determining the decay of soil
30 0.2122 0.0071 4.2441 infiltration capacity is by the Green and Ampt method.
While this equation was developed earlier (1911) it was
40 0.1273 0.0032 1.9099 largely superseded by the Horton’s equation from the
30 0.0891 0.0030 1.7825 1930’s. The form of the Green and Ampt equation is
given to be
n
The graph of the infiltration rate (mm/hr) vs cumulative f p =m+
time is given to be as follows: Fp
Where:
m and n are green and ampt constant
60.0000
Fp is the cumulative infiltration depth
50.0000
EXAMPLE 9:
40.0000 From the data given in example 8, develop the
parameters of the Horton’s equation and the green and
30.0000 ampt equation
20.0000
Time (min) 0 2 5 10 20
10.0000
Cumulative
0 130 280 510 680
0.0000 Vol (cm3)
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Time (min) 30 50 80 120 150
From the infiltration curve shown about it can be seen
that the longer the experiment, the smaller the Cumulative
900 1040 1190 1280 1343
infiltration rate since the soil becomes more saturated Vol (cm3)
as more water is added.
SOLUTIONS
From the infiltration curve shown above, the saturated Obtain the infiltration rate with respect to time using the
infiltration capacity is at 1.7825mm/hr since the last two procedures in example 8.
points of the graph are so close with each other Time Cumulative Depth of Infiltration rate
(min) water added Fp (cm) fp (mm/hr)
Unlike in evaporation and evapotranspiration, there are 0 0 0
no direct empirical equation for quantifying infiltration
but instead the equation that will be develop must rely 2 0.1839 55.1736
on actual soil investigation which will yield an equation 5 0.3961 42.4412
that is reliable on the local area where the initial
10 0.7215 39.0459
investigation has been made.
20 0.9620 14.4300
There are two empirical equations that shows the 30 1.2732 18.6741
infiltration capacity of soil and these are used to derive
50 1.4713 5.9418
the working equation for the infiltration rate. These are
given as follows: 80 1.6835 4.2441
1. Horton’s infiltration equation 120 1.8108 1.9099
2. Green and Ampt equation
150 1.9000 1.7825
Taking the value of fc to be 1.7825 mm/hr the difference
between fp and fc as well as its logarithm are solved as reliably express the data points in that graph.
follows
Taking
Time Infiltration rate (fp - fc) ln(fp - fc) f(x) to be ln(fp-fc);
(min) fp (mm/hr) -0.05x to be -Kh t
3.99 to be ln(fo – fc)
0 0 0
2 55.1736 53.3911 3.97764 It should be noted that the reason why kh is negative in
5 42.4412 40.6587 3.70521 the beginning is because the usual plot of the graph of
infiltration capacity will always have a negative slope
10 39.0459 37.2634 3.61801
which was actually seen in this example to be -0.05
20 14.4300 12.6475 2.53746
30 18.6741 16.8916 2.82682 Since fc = 1.7825 mm/hr and ln(fo – fc) = 3.99, the value
of f0 can be obtained as follows:
50 5.9418 4.1593 1.42535
80 4.2441 2.4616 0.90081 3.99 = ln(f0 – 1.7825)
120 1.9099 0.1274 -2.06042
Taking e at both sides will yield
150 1.7825 0 -
e3.99 = eln(fo – 1.7825)
By Horton’s equation:
The original form of Horton’s equation are given to be 54.0549 = f0 -1.7825
as follows:
(f p −f c )=( f 0 −f c ) e
−K t h f0 = 55.8374
Taking the natural logarithm of both sides of the The horton’s equation will now be rewritten as
equation will yield: −0.05 t
f p =1.7825 +(f 0 −1.7828 ) e
ln ( f p −f c )=ln [ (f 0−f c ) e ]
−K t h
this makes it similar in form to y = mx + b which is an For the Green and Ampt equation plot the values of f p
equation of a straight line. Plotting ln(fp-fc) vs time will against the inverse of Fp
result in a graph shown below:
Fp 1/Fp fp
5.00000
f(x) = − 0.05 x + 3.99 0 0 0
4.00000
R² = 0.96 0.1839 5.4374 55.1736
3.00000
0.3961 2.5245 42.4412
2.00000
0.7215 1.3860 39.0459
1.00000
0.9620 1.0395 14.4300
0.00000
1.2732 0.7854 18.6741
-1.00000 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
1.4713 0.6797 5.9418
-2.00000
1.6835 0.5940 4.2441
-3.00000
1.8108 0.5522 1.9099
Note that the equation of the line as well as the 1.9000 0.5263 1.7825
trendline were inserted using the insert trendline
function in spreadsheets and that function is present by
default in many spreadsheet tools such as excel,
libreoffice and WPS
f ( x )=−0.05 x +3.99
60
50
40
30
20
10 f(x) = 10.83 x + 4.12
R² = 0.75
0
0.0000 1.0000 2.0000 3.0000 4.0000 5.0000 6.0000
n
f p =m+
Fp
V. REFERENCES