Chapter 4 - Capacity and LOS
Chapter 4 - Capacity and LOS
Fundamental diagrams of
vehicular streams, q k
or u q enclose a region
that subtends the stream
conditions meeting a
certain safety level
Each level of flow q
corresponds to two
distinct stream conditions
(free flow and traffic
jam)
2
Capacity
The capacity of a transportation facility is defined as the
maximum number of vehicles that can be accommodated per
unit time under given conditions.
Maximum hourly rate (usually peak 15 minutes of the peak
hour)
3
Free-flow speed (FFS)
The mean speed of passenger cars that can be accommodated
under low to moderate flow rates on a uniform freeway
segment under prevailing roadway and traffic conditions.
Affected by
Lane width
Lateral clearance
Number of lanes
Interchange density
Geometric design
4
Level of Service (LOS)
Highway Capacity Manual
(2000)
5
6
A freeway is a divided highway with
full access control and two or more
lanes in each direction
7
Major Freeway Components
basic segment, on and off ramp
junctions, and weaving sections
Basic Segment
Weaving
On ramp Section Off ramp
junction junction
8
Major Freeway Components
basic segment, on and off ramp
junctions, and weaving sections
9
Ideal Conditions for Basic Freeway
Segments
Minimum lane widths of 3.6 m
Minimum right-shoulder lateral
clearance between the edge of
the travel lane and the nearest
obstacle or object that influences
traffic behavior of 1.8 m
Minimum median lateral
clearance of 0.6 m
Basic free
way segment 10
Ideal Conditions for Basic
Freeway Segments
Traffic stream composed entirely
of passenger cars
Five or more lanes for one
direction (in urban areas only)
Interchange spacing at 3 km or
greater
Level terrain, with grades no
greater than 2 percent
Driver population composed
principally of regular users of
the facility
11
LOS - A
Free-flow operation
Vehicles are completely free to
manoeuvre
Effects of incidents or point
breaks are easily absorbed
LOS B
Free-flow operation
Ability to maneuver is only
slightly restricted
Effects of minor incidents still
easily absorbed
12
LOS - C
Speeds at or near FFS
Freedom to maneuver is noticeably
restricted
Queues may form behind any
significant blockage.
LOS D
Speeds decline slightly with
increasing flows
Density increases more quickly
Freedom to maneuver is more
noticeably limited
Minor incidents create queuing
13
LOS - E
Operation near or at capacity
No useable gaps, and little room to
manoeuvre
Any disruption causes queuing
14
LOS F
Breakdown in flow
Queues form behind
breakdown points
Demand > capacity
15
Intended to relate quality of traffic service to
given volumes or flow of traffic.
Based on
Density in terms of passenger cars per
kilometer per lane
Speed in terms of mean passenger-car speed
Volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio
16
LOS Criteria for Basic Freeway Segments
Free-Flow LOS
Speed, km/hr Criteria A B C D E
120 Max density, pc/km/ln 7 11 16 22 28
Minimum speed, km/hr 120 120 114.6 99.6 85.7
Max v/c 0.35 0.55 0.77 0.92 1.00
Max service flow rate, 840 1320 1840 2200 2400
pc/hr/ln
110 Max density, pc/km/ln 7 11 16 22 28
Minimum speed, km/hr 110 110 108.5 97.2 83.9
Max v/c 0.33 0.51 0.74 .91 1.00
Max service flow rate, 770 1210 1740 2135 2350
pc/hr/ln
100 Max density, pc/km/ln 7 11 16 22 28
Minimum speed, km/hr 100 100 100 93.8 82.1
Max v/c 0.30 0.48 0.70 .90 1.00
Max service flow rate, 700 1100 1600 2065 2300
pc/hr/ln
90 Max density, pc/km/ln 7 11 16 22 28
Minimum speed, km/hr 90 90 90 89.1 80.4
Max v/c 0.28 0.44 0.64 0.87 1.00
Max service flow rate, 630 990 1440 1955 2250
pc/hr/ln
Table 1
Freeway LOS
17
LOS Criteria for Basic Freeway Segments
Figure 1 18
Freeway LOS
LOS Criteria for Basic Freeway Segments Example 1
At a basic section of freeway under ideal conditions, free flow
speed (FFS) was observed as 100 km/h through field
measurement. Determine:
a) The level of service (LOS) and the average speed (S) of this
section when the flow rate is 800 pc/hr/ln.
b) The level of service (LOS) and the average speed (S) of this
section when the flow rate is 1600 pc/hr/ln.
c) The capacity of this section.
d) If the FFS was observed as 106 km/hr, what is the expected
capacity?
Basic free
way
segment
19
Capacity and LOS Analysis Methodology
Operational analysis: LOS is required for specific traffic and roadway characteristics
vp
20
Limitations of the Methodology
The methodology does not apply to or take into account of :
Special lanes reserved for a particular type of vehicle ( truck,
climbing, etc.)
Extended bridge and tunnel segments
Facilities with FFS < 90 km/h or > 120 km/h
Demand conditions in excess of capacity
Posted speed limit
21
Capacity and LOS Analysis Methodology
FFS
vp
LOS
22
Determining FFS
Mean speed of passenger cars measured during low to
moderate flows (up to 1300 pc/h/ln)
Field Measurement of FFS
No adjustments are made to FFS
Weekday off-peak for moderate flow rate
Reflects the net effect of all condition at the study site
(speed, lane width, lateral clearance, interchange density,
number of lanes)
23
Determining FFS
Estimating of FFS
FFS BFFS f LW f LC fN f ID
24
Base Free-Flow Speed (BFFS)
Estimation of FFS for an existing or future freeway segment is
accomplished by adjusting a base free-flow speed downward
to reflect the influence of four factors
Lane width
Lateral clearance
Number of lanes
FFS BFFS f LW f LC fN f ID
Interchange density
25
Base Free-Flow Speed (BFFS)
Adjustment for lane width: base condition for lane width is 3.6
m
26
Base Free-Flow Speed (BFFS)
Adjustment for lateral clearance: 1.8 m or greater on the right
side
27
Base Free-Flow Speed (BFFS)
Adjustment for number of lanes: five or more lanes (in one
direction)
28
Base Free-Flow Speed (BFFS)
Adjustment for interchange density: 0.3 interchange density or
3.3 km interchange spacing
29
Determining Flow Rate
Hourly flow rate must reflect the influence of heavy vehicles,
the temporal variation of traffic flow over an hour, and the
characteristics of the driver population
Adjust hourly volumes (veh/h) to equivalent passenger-car
flow rate (pc/h)
V
vp
PHF N f HV fp
Peak 15
volume
minutes
1 hour Time
31
Determining Flow Rate
Peak hour factor (PHF)
Typical values
0.80 to 0.95
Lower PHF characteristic of rural or off-peak
Higher PHF typical of urban peak-hour
V
PHF
V15 4
V = hourly volume (veh/hr) for hour of analysis
V15 = maximum 15-min. flow rate within hour of analysis
32
Determining Flow Rate
Peak hour factor (PHF) - Example 2
Assume that 120, 125, 150, and 145 vehicles were counted
during each of the four 15-min. periods during the peak
hour. Compute PHF.
Now, hourly volume V = 150+120+125+145 = 540 veh/hr
Peak 15-minute volume V15(max) = 150
PHF = V/ [4×V15(max)] = 540/(4×150) = 0.90
U 540 Veh/ Hr
•
Up = = = 600 Veh/ Hr
PHF 0.9
33
Determining Flow Rate
Peak hour factor (PHF) Example 2
UP
¥ ¥0s 600 Veh / Hr
= =
-
=
,,
34
Determining Flow Rate
Heavy vehicle adjustment
Adjusted to an equivalent flow rate expressed in passengers
cars per hour per lane
Base condition (fHV = 1.0)
No heavy vehicles (trucks, buses, RVs)
1
f HV
1 PT ( ET 1) PR ( ER 1)
35
Determining Flow Rate
Heavy vehicle adjustment
If grade is long enough or steep enough to have a significant
effect on the operation of the overall segment it should be
analyzed as a separate segment
36
Determining Flow Rate
Heavy vehicle adjustment
Extended freeway segments
o General terrain refers to a series of single grades that are
not too long or too steep and as such do not have a
significant impact on the operation of the overall segment.
Such upgrades, downgrades, and level sections are
considered as extended general freeway segments.
o As a rule, extended segments may be used for grades less
than 2%, between 2% and 3% and less than 0.8 km, or
any grade of 3% or more and less than 0.4 km.
o The type of terrain, which is classified as level, rolling, or
mountainous, affects Passenger-car equivalent value.
37
Determining Flow Rate
Heavy vehicle adjustment
Equivalents for extened freeway segments
o Level terrain: combination of grades and horizontal or
vertical alignment that permits heavy vehicles to maintain
the same speed as passenger car
o Rolling terrain: combination of grades and horizontal or
vertical alignment that causes heavy vehicles to reduce
their speeds substantially below those of passenger cars
(not crawl speeds)
o Mountainous terrain: combination of grades and horizontal
or vertical alignment that causes heavy vehicles to operate
at crawl speeds for significant distances or at frequent
intervals
38
Determining Flow Rate
Heavy vehicle adjustment
Equivalents for extened freeway segments
39
1
Itp , / Et -
1) + PRIER 1)
-
40
Determining Flow Rate
Heavy vehicle adjustment
Equivalents for specific grades: upgrades
o Any grade between 2% and 3% and longer than 0.8 km,
or any grade of 3% or more and longer than 0.4 km is
usually analyzed as a separate segment.
41
CVG4150 - Won Taek Oh 42
43
Determining Flow Rate
Heavy vehicle adjustment
Equivalents for specific grades: downgrades
< 4010
44
Determining Flow Rate
Heavy vehicle adjustment
Equivalents for specific grades: downgrades
45
U
PHF ✗ Nxnfiiuxnfp
Driver population factor
Representative of stream in which most drivers are familiar
with the facility.
It is generally accepted that traffic streams with different
characteristics (i.e. recreational drivers) use freeways less
efficiently.
0.8 to 1.00 (commuter traffic, familiar users)
46
Determining LOS
Step 1: Use flow rate, vp and FFS curve to find average
passenger car speed (S)
47
FFS Up > 5 > D > LOS
Determining LOS
.
2.6
1 v p 15FFS 3100
S FFS 23FFS 1800
28 20 FFS 1300
vp - 15FFS)
S FFS
48
D
FFS Up > 5 > > Los
Determining LOS
.
vp
D
S
D = density (pc/km/ln)
vp = flow rate (pc/h/ln)
(pc/km/ln)
S = average passenger-car speed (km/h)
49
Determining LOS
Step 3: compare the calculated D with the density range in
Table 1 in the next slide
FFS .
Up > 5 > D > Los
50
Table 1
Freeway LOS
51
LOS Basic Freeway Segments Example 3
A rural freeway has an base/ideal free-flow speed of 120 km/h
and two 3.6m lanes in each direction, with right shoulder lateral
clearance of 1.2m. Interchanges are spaced approximately 5 km
apart. Traffic consists of 10% trucks and buses and 8%
recreational vehicles. The adjustment for driver population factor
is estimated to be 0.80. There is a 1.7 km long 3.1% grade.
PHF=0.9
a) At present, the expected hourly volume is 1584 veh/h. What is
the level of service on the upgrade section (use Table 1) and
on the downgrade section (use Figure 1)?
b) Determine the capacity and the max. 15-min flow rate on the
upgrade section.
c) If you wish to avoid capacity level operations and you wish to
provide LOS D, how many lanes would be required for the
upgrade section?
52
LOS Basic Freeway Segments Example 3
C 7
Table 1
Freeway LOS
53
LOS Basic Freeway Segments Example 3
Figure 1
54
Freeway LOS
LOS Basic Freeway Segments Example 3
:
Table 2 - fLW
Table 3 - fLC
55
LOS Basic Freeway Segments Example 3
Table 4 - fN
Table 5 - fID
56
LOS Basic Freeway Segments Example 3
Table 6 fHV
Extended Segments
Table 7 fHV
Specific Grades
57
LOS Basic Freeway Segments Example 3
Table 8 fHV
Specific Grades
>
58
LOS Basic Freeway Segments Example 3
Table 9 fHV
:
Specific Grades
Table 6 fHV
Extended Segments
59
Design of Basic Freeway Segments Example 4
Given:
Radial freeway being planned in urban area.
Freeway access expected to be provided at 2 km spacing.
Expected hourly volume V=3465 veh/hr
Right shoulder lateral clearance = 1.2 m
PHF=0.90 , Driver population factor =0.8
Rolling terrain, 15% trucks
Determine:
Number of lanes (3.6 m each) for LOS C
60
LOS Basic Freeway Segments Example 4
Table 1
Freeway LOS
61
LOS Basic Freeway Segments Example 4
104.8
Capacity
4 Lanes
3 Lanes
1468 1957
Figure11
Figure
62
Freeway LOS
Freeway LOS
LOS Basic Freeway Segments Example 4
Table 2 - fLW
Table 3 - fLC
63
LOS Basic Freeway Segments Example 4
Table 4 - fN
Table 5 - fID
64
LOS Basic Freeway Segments Example 4
Table 6 fHV
Extended Segments
Table 7 fHV
Specific Grades
65
66
Two-Lane Highways vs Freeway Segments
Freeway
(Each direction)
Two-Lane
Highway
N=1
(Each direction)
67
Capacity
HCM (2000) states: Capacity of two-lane highways is 1,700
pc/hr for each direction and will normally not exceed 3,200
pc/hr for both directions for long section of the highway.
For two lane highways in mountainous terrain and those
containing grades of 3% or more with lengths 1.0 km or more
should be analyzed using a different method and is not
covered here.
68
Class
Class I. Two-lane highways that function as primary
arterials, daily commuter routes, and links to other
69
Ideal Conditions for Basic Two-Lane
Highway Segments
Level terrain
Lane widths 3.6 m or greater
Clear shoulders 1.8 m wide or
greater
Passing permitted with absence of
no-passing zones
Passenger cars only in the traffic
stream
Equal volume in both directions
(50/50 directional split)
70
Level of Service (LOS)
There are two measures used to describe the service quality of a two-lane highway.
(1) percent time following another vehicle and
(2) average travel speed.
71
Level of Service
Class I two-lane highways: highways that serve a high
percentage of long trips
% time spent following (PTSF) in platoons
Average travel speed (ATS).
72
Level of Service (LOS)
Level of Service A: This is the highest quality of service that can be achieved.
Motorists are able to travel at their desired speed. The need for passing other
vehicles is well below the capacity for passing.
Class I highway average travel speed (ATS) is 90 km/h or greater.
Level of Service C: Further increases in flow beyond the LOS B range results
in a noticeable increase in the formation of platoons and an increase in platoon
size. Passing opportunities are severely decreased.
Class I highway average travel speeds (ATS) are 70 to 80 km/h
73
Level of Service (LOS)
74
Procedures for Evaluating LOS of Two-Way Segments
75
Criteria for Two-Lane Highways in Class I
(Table 1)
76
Criteria for Two-Lane Highways in Class II
(Table 2)
77
LOS Two-Lane Highways Example 5
The following values of PTSF and ATS have been determined
based on the analysis of four roadway segments. Determine the
LOS if the roadway segments are: (a) Class I and (b) Class II.
78
LOS Two-Lane Highways Example 5
(a) Class I
Segment 1: LOS
B
Segment 2: LOS
C
always go
> Segment 3: LOS
for the lowest
Los for class I D
Segment 4: LOS
E
(Table 1) 79
LOS Two-Lane Highways Example 5
(a) Class II
we are
since class z
analysing
ya
Segment 1: LOS
A
Segment 2: LOS
B
Segment 3: LOS
C
Segment 4: LOS
E
(Table 2) 80
Methodology for LOS
81
Methodology for LOS
82
Determining Free-Flow Speed (FFS) (Class I)
Field measurement
Mean speed of traffic under low flow conditions (up to two-
way flows of 200 pc/h)
Volume adjustment should be made for more than 200 pc/h of
field measurements
83
Determining Free-Flow Speed
Field measurement
Adjustment for volumes more than 200 pc/h
Vf
FFS S FM 0.0125
f HV
84
Determining Free-Flow Speed
Estimating FFS
FFS BFFS f LS fA
Note that BFFS depends on local conditions and the transportation engineer
should estimate it based on their knowledge of the area and the speeds on similar
facilities. The range of BFFS is 70 100 km/h. Posted speed limits may serve as
replacements for BFFS
85
Determining Free-Flow Speed
Estimating FFS
fLs: base condition for a two-lane highway require 3.6 m lane
widths and 1.8 m shoulder widths
86
Determining Free-Flow Speed
Estimating FFS
Access point density: dividing the total
number of intersections and driveways
on both sides of the roadway segment by
the length of the segment in kilometers
sides
on Both
Total 2 lane
of the
highway
87
Determining demand flow rate (Class I & II)
V
vp
PHF fG f HV
88
Determining demand flow rate
Grade adjustment factor (fG) to determin speed (ATS)
V
vp
PHF fG f HV
89
Determining demand flow rate
Grade adjustment factor (fG) to percent
V
time-spent-following (PTSF) vp
PHF fG f HV
90
Determining demand flow rate
Heavy vehicle adjustment factor(fHV)
1
f HV
1 PT ( ET 1) PR ( ER 1)
91
Determining demand flow rate
Adjustment for heavy vehicles (speed ATS)
92
Determining demand flow rate
Adjustment for heavy vehicles (percent
time-spent-following PTSF)
93
Determining demand flow rate
V
vp
PHF fG f HV
1
f HV
1 PT ( ET 1) PR ( ER 1)
94
Determining demand flow rate
Iterative computations
i. Set
V
vp
PHF
ii. Next using the appropriate values of fG, and fHV, calculate
a new value of vp. Check the value. If not within the flow
limits for which fG, ET and ER were calculated, recalculate
vp with new values of fG, ET and ER. Continue until vp is
determined.
95
Determining Average Travel Speed (Class I)
ATS = average travel speed for both directions of travel combined (km/h)
fnp = adjustment for percentage of no-passing zones
vp = passenger-car equivalent flow rate for peak 15 min period (pc/h)
96
Determining Average Travel Speed
Adjustment (fnp) for effect of no-passing zones on average
travel speed on two-way segments
97
fnp
98
Determining Percent Time-Spent-Following (Class I & II)
PTSF BPTSF f d / np
99
fd/np
100
101
Determining LOS
1) First comparing vp with the two-way capacity of 3,200 pc/h
2) If vp is greater than capacity, the LOS is F
3) Also, if the demand flow rate in either direction (vp times
directional split) is > 1700 pc/h, the LOS is F
4) For a segment on a Class I facility with demand less than
capacity, the LOS is determined by comparing the average
travel speed (ATS) and percent (%) time spent following
(PTSF) with limits given in HCM Table, with the case
governing highway operation
5) For segment on Class II facility with demand less than
capacity, LOS is determined by comparing the percent (%)
time spent following (PTSF) with the limits given in HCM
Table
102
LOS Two-Lane Highways Example 6
Given:
Class II Two-Lane Highway in rolling terrain.
Volume = 1600 veh/h (two-way)
PHF = 0.95
Percent directional split = 50/50
Percent no-passing zone = 50%
Determine: Determine the LOS
103
LOS Two-Lane Highways Example 6
Table 1
LOS Class I
Table 2
LOS Class II
104
LOS Two-Lane Highways Example 6
Table 3
FFS fLS
Table 4
FFS fA
105
LOS Two-Lane Highways Example 6
Table 5a
ATS fG
Table 5b
PTSF fG
106
LOS Two-Lane Highways Example 6
Table 6a
ATS fHV
Table 6b
PTSF fHV
107
LOS Two-Lane Highways Example 6
fnp
Table 7a
ATS fnp
108
LOS Two-Lane Highways Example 6
fd/np
Table 7b
FTSP fd/np
109
LOS Two-Lane Highways Example 7
A Class I two-lane highway has a base free-flow speed of 100
km/h. Lane width is 3.6 m and shoulder width is 1.2m. There are 6
access points per km. The roadway is located in rolling terrain
with 40% no-passing zones. The two-way traffic volume is 800
veh/hr with PHF = 0.9. The directional split is 60/40. Traffic
includes 5% trucks and 10% recreational vehicles. Determine the
level of service (LOS).
110