Lec 3
Lec 3
∂L
π(x) ≡
∂ φ̇(x)
2. Classical Hamiltonian:
1 2 ks a2
i.e. H(φ, π) = π + (∂x φ)2
2m 2
3. Canonical Quantisation:
As with any fn, operator-valued fns. can be expressed as Fourier series expansion:
Z L=N a
φ̂(x) = 1 X e±ikx φ̂k , φ̂k ≡ 1 dx e∓ikx φ̂(x)
π̂(x) L1/2 k π̂k π̂k L1/2 0 π̂(x)
P
k runs over all quantised wavevectors k = 2πm/L, m ∈ Z
Exercise: confirm [π̂k , φ̂k′ ] = −i~δkk′
Advice: Maintain strict conventions(!) — we will pass freely between real and Fourier
space (and we will not care to write a tilde in each case).
Hermiticity: φ̂† (x) = φ̂(x), implies φ̂†k = φ̂−k (similarly π̂). Using
δk+k′ ,0
Z L z Z L }| { !
X 1 ′
X X
dx (∂ φ̂)2 = (ik φ̂k )(ik ′ φ̂k′ ) dx ei(k+k )x = k 2 φ̂k φ̂−k = k 2 |φ̂k |2
0 L 0 k k
′k,k
mωk2 /2
z }| {
Xh 1 ks a2 2 i
Ĥ = π̂k π̂−k + k φ̂k φ̂−k
k
2m 2
Comments:
• Ĥ provides explicit description of the low energy excitations of the system (waves)
in terms of their microscopic constituents (atoms)
• However, it would be much more desirable to develop a picture where the
relevant excitations appear as fundamental units...
to learn how, noting the structural similarity, let us digress and discuss/revise the...
p̂2 1
Ĥ = + mω 2 q̂ 2
2m 2
Although a single-particle problem, its property of equidistant
energy level separation, ǫn = ~ω n + 12 suggests alternative interpretation: