The document outlines a series of exam questions related to economic concepts such as price ceilings, price floors, elasticity of demand, and government intervention in markets. Each question is divided into two parts, requiring explanations and real-world examples to discuss the implications for stakeholders and the effectiveness of various economic policies. The total marks for each question are 25, and the document is intended for assessment purposes by the International Baccalaureate Organization.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
102 views3 pages
Paper 1 (1) Students
The document outlines a series of exam questions related to economic concepts such as price ceilings, price floors, elasticity of demand, and government intervention in markets. Each question is divided into two parts, requiring explanations and real-world examples to discuss the implications for stakeholders and the effectiveness of various economic policies. The total marks for each question are 25, and the document is intended for assessment purposes by the International Baccalaureate Organization.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3
Paper 1 (1) [250 marks]
1. [Maximum mark: 25] SPM.1.SL.TZ0.1
(a) Explain two reasons why a government might set a price ceiling (maximum price) on a good. [10]
(b) Using real-world examples, discuss the consequences of a price
ceiling on stakeholders. [15]
2. [Maximum mark: 25] 24M.1.SL.TZ1.1
(a) Explain how one determinant of demand might lead to a decrease in the price of wheat and how one determinant of supply might lead to an increase in the price of wheat. [10]
(b) Using real-world examples, evaluate the view that price floors (minimum prices) should never be used. [15]
3. [Maximum mark: 25] 24M.1.SL.TZ2.1
(a) Explain how a decrease in the price of travelling by train might affect the price and output of its substitutes and of its complements. [10]
(b) Using real-world examples, evaluate the view that the
government should never provide subsidies to firms. [15]
4. [Maximum mark: 25] 23N.1.SL.TZ1.1
(a) Explain how the availability of substitutes for a good and whether a good is a necessity affect its price elasticity of demand. [10] (b) Using real-world examples, examine the importance of price elasticity of demand to firms and to governments. [15]
5. [Maximum mark: 25] 23N.1.SL.TZ2.1
(a) Explain the difference between price elasticity of demand and income elasticity of demand. [10]
(b) Using real-world examples, evaluate the view that an
understanding of price elasticity of demand can be useful for firms trying to increase total revenue. [15]
6. [Maximum mark: 25] 23N.1.HL.TZ1.1
(a) Explain two determinants of price elasticity of demand. [10]
(b) Using real-world examples, discuss how a government might
respond to a situation in which there is a high concentration ratio in a market. [15]
7. [Maximum mark: 25] 23M.1.SL.TZ1.1
(a) Explain why, in the case of healthcare and education, positive externalities might cause market failure. [10]
(b) Using real-world examples, discuss whether the provision of
subsidies is the best way to increase the consumption of merit goods. [15]
8. [Maximum mark: 25] 23M.1.SL.TZ2.1
(a) Explain two types of government intervention that could be used to correct the market failure arising from the consumption of demerit goods. [10]
(b) Using real-world examples, discuss whether public goods
should always be provided directly by the government. [15]
9. [Maximum mark: 25] 23M.1.HL.TZ2.1
(a) Explain why products may have different income elasticities of demand. [10]
(b) Using real-world examples, discuss the assumption that
consumers always seek to maximize their utility. [15]
10. [Maximum mark: 25] 22N.1.SL.TZ0.1
(a) Explain two forms of government intervention in markets. [10]
(b) Using real-world examples, discuss the view that governments
should intervene if markets fail to provide public goods. [15]