Major Social Science Methodologies and Research Designs - Chart
Major Social Science Methodologies and Research Designs - Chart
Quantitative Data Quantitative data Psychology, Quantitative data is Pros: Walter Mischel
is the value of Sociology and conducted using - Research marshmallow
data represented Anthropology surveys, using experiment.
by counts or experiments, field quantitative
numbers where observations and data is very
each set of data focus groups. fast
has a unique - It’s reliable
numerical value and
repeatable
information
- The findings
can be
generalized
with
quantitative
data
Cons:
- Quantitativ
e data
cannot be
followed-up
by any
other
answers
- You do not
have access
to specific
feedback
- It could
create an
unnatural
environmen
t
Field Observation Field observation Sociology and A field observation is Pros: Also Jane
is a type of field Psychology conducted to find - It gives Goodall’s
research that is and observe the very research on
used to observe a person or group of detailed chimpanzees
targeted person people and draws data
or a group of correlations between - It
targeted people subjects and emphasizes
in their surroundings, and the role and
environment in how the surroundings relevance
order to learn might change their of social
their behavior, behavior. context
activities and - It can find
process. social facts
that may
not be
obvious at
first or
which
research
participants
might be
unaware of.
Cons:
- It might
lack
breadth;
gathering
very
detailed
information
means
being
unable to
gather data
from a very
large
number of
people or
groups.
- It may be
emotionally
taxing.
- Documentin
g
observation
s may be
more
challenging
than with
other
methods
Focus Group A Psychology, Focus groups are Pro’s: The Second World
demographically Sociology and conducted to collect - Easy to War propaganda
diverse group of Anthropology qualitative data and measure focus group, the
people assembled in-depth insights. customer first ‘focused
to participate in a They allow reactions interview'.
guided discussion researchers to gather - Very easy
about a particular information on to save
product before it anything from time
is launched, or to products and Cons:
provide ongoing services to beliefs - Not as
feedback on a and perceptions in much depth
political order to reveal true compared
campaign, customer attitudes to other
television series, and opinions. market
etc. research
options
- Focus
groups are
much more
expensive
compared
to other
options
- Moderators
can greatly
impact the
bias of the
people in
the focus
group
Example:
Suppose a school board is considering restructuring local schools. What would be the best method of collecting reliable and valid
data to use in comparing the viability of the various schools? What would be the benefits of using qualitative data? What would
be the benefits of using quantitative data?” The benefits of using qualitative data would be that it is easier to look at and put into
words that can be understood. For example, asking the students about their opinions on teachers is easy to understand. This is in
contrast to quantitative data where you would say, look at each teacher's test scores. This can also be seen as better, because
there is less room for bias, as well as more objectivity.