0% found this document useful (0 votes)
30 views26 pages

Chapter 3 Compression Members

The document discusses the design and classification of compression members in structural engineering, highlighting their resistance to axial compression and the effects of length on this resistance. It categorizes cross-sections into four classes based on their buckling resistance and outlines the design considerations for columns, including slenderness ratios and buckling resistance. Additionally, it provides examples of calculations for determining the adequacy of specific column sections under axial loads.

Uploaded by

tatek
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
30 views26 pages

Chapter 3 Compression Members

The document discusses the design and classification of compression members in structural engineering, highlighting their resistance to axial compression and the effects of length on this resistance. It categorizes cross-sections into four classes based on their buckling resistance and outlines the design considerations for columns, including slenderness ratios and buckling resistance. Additionally, it provides examples of calculations for determining the adequacy of specific column sections under axial loads.

Uploaded by

tatek
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 26

3.

COMPRESSION MEMBERS
A structural member is considered a compression member if designed
primarily to resist axial compression.
Examples of compression members:
 column
 top chords of trusses
 Struts

The resistance of a compression member decreases as its length increases.


The axially loaded tension member resistance is not dependent on its
length. If the bending action is significant, the member is termed a beam
column and designed differently
1
Classification of cross-section
 ES EN1993: 2015 classifies sections
into four categories.
 The role of cross-section classification
is to identify the extent to which
their local buckling resistance limits
the resistance and rotation capacity.

2
.

 Class 1 /plastic section/:- can form a plastic hinge with the rotation
capacity required from the plastic analysis without reducing the resistance.
 Class 2 /compact sections/:- can develop plastic moment resistance but
have limited rotation capacity because of local buckling.
 Class 3 /semi-compact section/:- the stress in the extreme compression
fibre of the steel member can reach the yield strength. Still, local buckling
is liable to prevent the development of plastic moment resistance.
 Class 4 /thin-walled section/:- local buckling will occur before attaining
yield stress in one or more parts of the cross-section. Effective widths may
be used to make the necessary allowances for reductions in resistance due
to the effects of local buckling.
3
.

 The classification of sections depends on:


 the category of flange and web elements
whether it is pure compression, pure bending
or combined compression and bending.
 the width to thickness ratio of the parts
subject to compression
 most of compression elements, can be separated
into two categories:
 Internal elements: supported along two edges
parallel to the compressive stress direction.
 Outstand elements: attached along one edge and
free on the other edge parallel to the direction of
compressive stress.
4
.

5
.

6
Design Compression Members
Columns, based on slenderness ratio are distinguished as:
Stocky Columns:- Very low slenderness, unaffected by overall buckling
and failure results from rupture of cross-section.
Slender Columns
 Medium slenderness:- unaffected by imperfection, ultimate failure load
≈ Euler Load and independent of yield stress.
 Large slenderness:- affected by imperfection and failure load is less
than Euler Load
Euler Load /elastic critical load/ is the maximum load supported by the
column free from any type of imperfection.
Effective length (Le) of a column is defined as length between the points of
contraflexure of BMD of the buckled column.
7
.

8
.

 Compression Resistance of Cross section


 For members in axial compression, the design value of the compressive
force Nc, Sd at each cross-section shall satisfy:
 Compressive resistance Nc, Rd equals
For Class 1, 2 and 3 cross-sections
 For Class 4 cross-sections, compressive resistance is limited to local
buckling resistance of the cross-section:
 Flexural Buckling Resistance
• A compression member should be verified against buckling as:
• The design buckling resistance
for Class 1,2 and 3 cross-sections:
for class 4 cross-sections: 9
.

 Buckling curves
The value of χ, reduction factor for the relevant buckling mode, for the
appropriate non-dimensional slenderness 𝜆̅ should be determined as:

α is an imperfection factor
𝑁𝑐𝑟 is the elastic critical force
for the relevant buckling mode
based on the gross cross-section

10
.

11
.

Values of χ for appropriate 𝜆̅ may be obtained from fig. 6.4:

For slenderness 𝜆̅ ≤ 0.2 or for 𝑁𝐸𝑑/𝑁𝑐𝑟 ≤ 0.04 the buckling effects may be
ignored and only cross sectional checks apply. 12
Examples on Compression Members
1. Check a column subjected to an axial compression force 6000 kN, using a
UC 254 ×254×167 (universal column) cross section in S 355 steel, according to
ES EN 3. The column is supported as shown in the figure. With length of 5 m.

13
.

14
Solution:
• Given:- 𝑁𝑐,𝑆𝑑 = 6000𝑘𝑁 L = 5𝑚
S − 355 UC − 254 ∗ 254 ∗ 167
• Required:- Check the capacity
• Solution:-
 Geometrical properties [ Tables\Universal columns.pdf ]:-
ℎ = 289.1 𝑚𝑚; 𝑏𝑓 = 265.2 𝑚𝑚; 𝑡𝑓 = 31.7 𝑚𝑚; 𝑡𝑤 = 19.2 𝑚𝑚; 𝐴 = 213 𝑐𝑚2 ;
𝑟 = 12.7 𝑚𝑚; 𝐼𝑦 = 30000 𝑐𝑚4 ; 𝐼𝑧 = 9870 𝑐𝑚4 ; 𝑖𝑦 = 11.9 𝑐𝑚; 𝑖𝑧 = 6.81 𝑐𝑚;

 Cross-Section Classification:

𝜀= 235 235
𝑓𝑦 = 355 = 0.81
15
.
 For the flange:
b−𝑡𝑤 −2𝑟 265.2−19.2−2∗12.7
c 2 2
= = = 3.48
tf 𝑡𝑓 31.7
9𝜀 = 9 ∗ 0.81 = 7.29
→→→ 3.48 < 7.29 →→→→→→ Class 1
 For the web:
d ℎ;2(𝑡𝑓 :𝑟) 289.1;2∗(31.7:12.7)
= = = 10.43
tw 𝑡𝑤 19.2
33𝜀 = 33 ∗ 0.81 = 26.73
→→→ 10.43 < 26.73 →→→→→→ Class 1
Therefore, the whole section is class 1 (plastic).

16
.
 Compression resistance of the cross section
𝐴 ∗ 𝑓𝑦 21300 ∗ 355
𝑁𝑐,𝑅𝑑 = = ∗ 10;3 = 7561.5𝑘𝑁
𝛾𝑚0 1.00
𝑁𝑐,𝑅𝑑 (7561.5𝑘𝑁) > 𝑁𝑐,𝑆𝑑 (6000𝑘𝑁) Safe !!!
 Flexural buckling resistance of a member
• buckling length: 𝐿𝐸 𝑦 = 5𝑚 (𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑦 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑒𝑑)
𝐿𝐸 𝑧 = 3𝑚 𝑎𝑛𝑑 2𝑚 (𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑦 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑒𝑑)
• slenderness coefficients: [take E = 210 GPa]
Ε 210∗103
𝜆1 = 𝜋 =𝜋 = 76.4 ; [slenderness at stress level of 𝑓𝑦 ]
𝑓𝑦 355

OR, 𝜆1 = 93.9𝜀 = 93.9 ∗ 0.81 = 76.1


17
.

[𝜆 𝑖𝑠 𝑠𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜]
• Calculation of the reduction factor, 𝜒
ℎ 289.1
= = 1.09 < 1.2 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡𝑓 = 31.7𝑚𝑚 < 100𝑚𝑚
𝑏 265.2
Bending around z  curve c 𝛼 = 0.49

18
.
 Safety verification
𝜒𝐴𝑓𝑦 0.808∗21300∗355
𝑁𝑏,𝑅𝑑 = = = 6110𝑘𝑁
𝛾𝑚1 1.0

As 𝑁𝑐,𝑆𝑑 = 6000𝑘𝑁 < 𝑁𝑏,𝑅𝑑 = 6110𝑘𝑁


 Safety is verified !!!

19
.

2. Design a suitable UC of S 355 steel to resist a factored axial compression


load corresponding to a permanent load of 160 kN and a variable load of
230KN. Let Lcr,y=12m and Lcr,z = 6m.

20
Solution:
 𝑁𝐸𝑑 = 1.35𝐺𝑘 + 1.5𝑄𝑘 = 1.35 ∗ 160 + 1.5 ∗ 230 = 561 𝑘𝑁
 First trial section: [use 𝑓𝑦 = 355𝑀𝑃𝑎 , 𝜒 = 0.5 & 𝑁𝑏,𝑅𝑑 ≥ 𝑁𝐸𝑑 ]
𝜒𝐴𝑓𝑦 𝑁𝑏,𝑅𝑑 ∗𝛾𝑚1 561000∗1.0
𝑁𝑏,𝑅𝑑 = 𝐴≥ = = 31.6𝑐𝑚2
𝛾𝑚1 𝜒∗𝑓𝑦 0.5∗355

• Take 152*152*30-UC with 𝐴 = 38.3 𝑐𝑚2 ; 𝑡𝑓 = 9.4 𝑚𝑚;


𝑖𝑦 = 6.76 𝑐𝑚; 𝑖𝑧 = 3.83 𝑐𝑚

𝜀= 235 = 235 = 0.81 and take the longer side (major axis)
𝑓𝑦 355

12000 1
= ∗ = 2.33
67.6 93.9∗0.81
Buckling will occur about the major (y) axis.

21
.
• For a rolled UC section:
ℎ 157.6
= = 1.03 < 1.2 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡𝑓 = 9.4 𝑚𝑚 < 100 𝑚𝑚
𝑏 152.9
Bending about y axis  curve b  𝛼 = 0.34
= 0.5 1 + 0.34 2.33 − 0.2 + 2.332 = 3.57
1
= = 0.16 < 0.5
3.57: 3.572 ;2.332
0.5:0.16
• Second trial section: [𝜒 = = 0.33]
2
561000∗1.0
𝐴≥ = 47.89 𝑐𝑚2  take 203*203*46-UC with 𝐴 =
0.33∗355
58.7 𝑐𝑚2 ; 𝑡𝑓 = 11 𝑚𝑚; 𝑡𝑤 = 7.2 𝑚𝑚; 𝑖𝑦 = 8.82 𝑐𝑚; 𝑖𝑧 = 5.13 𝑐𝑚
12000 1
= ∗ = 1.79
88.2 93.9∗0.81
22
.
ϕ = 0.5 1 + 0.34 1.79 − 0.2 + 1.792 = 2.37
1
χ= = 0.25 < 0.5
2.37 + 2.372 − 1.792
• Take the next largest area section: 203*203*52-UC with
𝐴 = 66.3 𝑐𝑚2 ; b = 204.3 𝑚𝑚; ℎ = 206.2 𝑚𝑚; 𝑡𝑓 = 12.5 𝑚𝑚;
𝑡𝑤 = 7.9 𝑚𝑚; r = 10.2 mm; 𝑖𝑦 = 8.91 𝑐𝑚; 𝑖𝑧 = 5.18 𝑐𝑚
 Section classification:
b−𝑡𝑤 −2𝑟 204.3−7.9−2∗10.2
c 2 2
Flange: = = = 7.04 < 9𝜀 = 7.29 → Class 1
tf 𝑡𝑓 12.5

d ℎ;2(𝑡𝑓 :𝑟) 206.2;2∗(12.5:10.2)


Web: = = = 20.35 < 33𝜀Class 1
tw 𝑡𝑤 7.9
Therefore, the whole section is class 1
23
.
• Non dimensional slenderness:
12000 1
• = ∗ = 1.77
89.1 93.9∗0.81
ℎ 206.2
• Buckling curve and imperfection factor: = < 1.2 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡𝑓 <
[
𝑏 204.3
100 𝑚𝑚] implies buckling about y axis  curve b  𝛼 = 0.34
ϕ = 0.5 1 + 0.34 1.77 − 0.2 + 1.772 = 2.33
1
• Reduction factor: χ = = 0.26
2.33: 2.332 ;1.772
• Buckling resistance:
𝜒𝐴𝑓𝑦 0.26∗6630∗355
𝑁𝑏,𝑅𝑑 = = = 612𝑘𝑁 > 561𝑘𝑁 = 𝑁𝑐,𝐸𝑑
𝛾𝑚1 1.0

So, the 203 ∗ 203 ∗ 52 𝑈𝐶 is satisfactory.


24
Exercise 2
• Check a column subjected to an axial compression force 2500 kN, using a UB
528 ×209×82 cross section in S 275 steel, according to ES EN 3. The column
is supported as shown in the figure. With length of 6 m.

25
Assignment - 2
For the following truss, design the upper cord members (compressed
members) with L = 3.00 m. Consider the same type of cross section, that is
circular tube (CT), with welded connections between the members of the
structure.
Use S-355 steel

26

You might also like