Deterministic Numerical Modeling of Soil Structure Interaction 1st Edition Stephane Grangepdf Download
Deterministic Numerical Modeling of Soil Structure Interaction 1st Edition Stephane Grangepdf Download
https://ebookmass.com/product/deterministic-numerical-modeling-
of-soil-structure-interaction-1st-edition-stephane-grange/
https://ebookmass.com/product/deterministic-and-stochastic-modeling-
in-computational-electromagnetics-dragan-poljak/
https://ebookmass.com/product/mycorrhizal-mediation-of-soil-fertility-
structure-and-carbon-storage-1st-edition-edition-nancy-collins-
johnson/
https://ebookmass.com/product/soil-mapping-and-process-modeling-for-
sustainable-land-use-management-1st-edition-edition-paulo-pereira/
https://ebookmass.com/product/advances-in-engineered-cementitious-
composite-materials-structures-and-numerical-modeling-y-x-zhang/
Peridynamic Modeling, Numerical Techniques, and
Applications Erkan Oterkus
https://ebookmass.com/product/peridynamic-modeling-numerical-
techniques-and-applications-erkan-oterkus/
https://ebookmass.com/product/audio-production-principles-practical-
studio-applications-1st-edition-stephane-elmosnino/
https://ebookmass.com/product/fundamentals-of-soil-ecology-3rd-
edition/
Deterministic Numerical Modeling
of Soil–Structure Interaction
Series Editor
Marc Boulon
Deterministic
Numerical Modeling of
Soil–Structure Interaction
Edited by
Stéphane Grange
Diana Salciarini
First published 2021 in Great Britain and the United States by ISTE Ltd and John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as
permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, this publication may only be reproduced,
stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, with the prior permission in writing of the publishers,
or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms and licenses issued by the
CLA. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside these terms should be sent to the publishers at the
undermentioned address:
www.iste.co.uk www.wiley.com
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix
Index. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213
Introduction
The geotechnical works are usually designed referring to the following three
situations:
1) The pseudo-static case: where the loadings are nearly time independent
(a small number of cycles are accepted).
2) The cyclic case: involving a large number of slow cycles (slow versus the
time scales of any physical phenomena involved).
3) The dynamic (mostly seismic) case: where inertia forces are taken into
account.
In the pseudo-static and cyclic cases, the SSI is defined from a local point of
view, whereas in dynamic conditions it is examined from a more global angle. The
soil–structure interfaces, transfer zones of the loads acting between soil and
structure, and often zones of large localized deformations have a significant
importance. Special strategies and experimental characterization tests have been
developed for describing them.
– The classical and well-known finite element method (FEM) using interface or
contact elements available for coupled hydro-mechanical problems and in which the
local plastic energy dissipation contributes to the classical global damping.
– The distinct element method (DEM) in which the contact zones between soil
and structure are described by local adapted interaction laws.
– The finite difference method (FDM) using explicit algorithm in which interface
or contact elements are available and straightforward for coupled hydro-mechanical,
highly nonlinear with high deformation and dynamic problems.
– The more recent approaches based on the macro-element concept and
generalized variables in an incremental form available in static and dynamic
situations, where a large volume of soil underlying and surrounding the-structure is
represented by a small number of degrees of freedom. This method could be
considered as an improved extension of the stiffness coefficient methods known for
the piles as the t-z and p-y curves.
– The seismology approach with inertia and viscous equivalent damping forces,
in which the SSI is developed between several structures (like buildings in a town)
using the notion of meta-materials. This point of view is especially useful when
analyzing the movement of the buildings induced by a seismic event at the scale of a
town.
1
1.1. Introduction
The advent of numerical methods and, especially, finite element approaches has
provided engineers with formidable tools to predict the behavior of constructions.
Most of the time, the soil can be considered as a homogeneous medium behaving in
a purely drained or undrained manner. However, in some cases, depending on the soil
permeability and the loading rate, partially drained behaviors should be considered.
In this case, hydro-mechanical couplings must be included in the finite element
formulation for both volume and interface elements.
The development of renewable energy sources is the greatest challenge of the 21st
Century. A large number of offshore wind farms have been developed throughout the
last decade, especially in shallow waters in the North Sea where a sandy seabed is
mostly encountered. The offshore wind industry is expected to grow exponentially,
followed by the development of more recent wave and tidal energy devices. Whether
they are bottom-fixed or floating, their foundations or anchors will have to be designed.
The finite element simulation of anchors and foundations has become more popular
among offshore wind farm designers. However, the modeling of the interface between
the soil and the foundations is still very rudimentary.
From the mechanical point of view, shearing along the interfaces participates in the
strength of the foundation against applied loads in any direction (horizontal, vertical
or moment). When the maximum capacity is overcome, sliding occurs between the
soil and the foundation. Each movement of the foundation results in a fluid flow, since
it lies under the sea. This affects the interface behavior by modifying the maximum
shear stress available or by inducing a suction effect, because of a gap opening (e.g. for
suction caissons). The finite element modeling of these complex interactions at the
interface is the topic of this chapter.
The finite element method (FEM) is one of the most popular numerical methods for
solving partial differential equations for boundary value problems [ZIE 00]. The main
concept of the method is to decompose the entire continuum domain to be modeled
into a collection of subdomains, called elements. The continuum field of any physical
variable of interest (e.g. displacement, pore water pressure) is approximated over each
element, based on a finite number of variables (physical unknowns) and pre-defined
interpolation functions. The partial differential equations that must be solved over the
entire continuum domain can then be approximated and discretized for each element.
The set of discrete equations associated with each element can be combined into a
single global system and solved algebraically. The solution of this set of equations
is the one that minimizes the error of the approximation with respect to the actual
Hydro-mechanically Coupled Interface Finite Element 3
solution. The FEM has many advantages, such as the ability to simulate complex
geometries, incorporate different constitutive laws, involve multiphysical couplings
and analyze stress and internal variables locally.
Numerically solving the mechanical contact problem is not a recent topic, and
several books have been dedicated to this issue [JOH 92, WRI 06]. Within the
framework of finite element methods, two general approaches exist in order to manage
contact between two solid bodies, namely the thin layer and the zero-thickness
approach, as shown in Figure 1.1.
The first approach consists of explicitly modeling the contact zone with special
finite elements, designed to encounter large shear or compression deformation
[DES 84, SHA 93, WRI 13, WEI 15]. The second approach, adopted in the following,
involves special boundary elements which have no thickness, namely zero-thickness
elements [GOO 68, CHA 88, DAY 94, HAB 98, WRI 06]. They discretize a potential
zone of contact. A gap between each side of the interface and a probable other solid is
computed at each time step to detect contact. Three main ingredients are necessary to
formulate this approach:
– a criterion to rule the contact detection/loss and contact pressure evolution;
– a constitutive law to describe the shear/normal behavior(s);
– a technique to discretize the contact area between solids and to compute the gap
function gN , namely the distance between two solids.
No contact Contact
Medium 1
Thin layer
elements Medium 3
Medium 2
Thin layer
Medium 1
Boundary
elements
Medium 2
Zero-thickness
The normal contact constraint ensures that two perfectly smooth solids in contact
do not overlap each other. This mathematical criterion relates the gap function gN and
the contact pressure pN . It states that when the gap is null, the solids are in contact
and a contact pressure prevents their overlapping. When the pressure is equal to zero
and the gap is greater than or equal to zero, there is no contact.
The relationship between gap and pressure evolution can be termed as high
precision or low precision. In the first case, this relationship is physically based and
the pressure increases with a gap that can be negative, leading to interpenetration
(gN < 0). This is especially true in rock mechanics, where surfaces in contact are
not perfectly smooth and the normal pressure increases with deformation of asperities
[GEN 90].
Zoom
Penetration
The penalty method is adopted in the following for its simplicity, since it does
not require us to introduce a variable number of unknowns (Lagrange multipliers) at
each step. Both solutions are theoretically identical if the penalty coefficient tends
Hydro-mechanically Coupled Interface Finite Element 5
to infinity. However, increasing this coefficient too much creates a badly conditioned
stiffness matrix, which becomes difficult to solve.
The mobilization of shear stress along the interface is very important in many
applications. The maximum shear stress that could be mobilized in a tangential plane
is strongly dependent on the normal pressure. The most basic relationship between
them is the classical Coulomb criterion. However, similar to the normal behavior,
more complex constitutive laws may be defined: for example, to describe rock joints
[ALO 13, ZAN 13] or soil–structure interfaces [LIU 06, STU 16], including critical
state, we use dilative normal behavior and even cyclic degradation [LIU 08].
Gap Gap
Gap
The segment-to-segment discretization [HAB 98, PUS 04, FIS 06] is based on the
mortar method developed in [BEL 98]. In this case, the contact constraint is applied
over the element in a weak sense. The gap function is computed by the closest-point
projection of a point of the non-mortar surface onto the mortar surface, which is given
more importance. In the following, this method is adopted. The distance is computed at
each integration point of the element and extrapolated over it by means of interpolation
functions.
The flow problem within interfaces may be treated similarly to the mechanical
contact problem by special volume elements [THI 14] or the zero-thickness method
[GUI 02, SEG 08a]. The second approach is further developed in the following to be
consistent with the mechanical formulation. The flow problem is intrinsically coupled
with the mechanical problem through the opening/closing of the gap. In addition to
the flow along the interface direction, transversal flow also occurs, causing a drop of
pressure between the two sides. Two basic ingredients are necessary to describe this
part:
– a law relating the flow to the gradient of pressure (transversal/longitudinal);
– a technique to discretize the flow within and through the interface.
The single-node discretization of flow is the simplest one, as shown in Figure 1.4.
It simply superposes a discontinuity for fluid flow into a continuous porous medium
[BER 88]. In this case, there is no hydro-mechanical coupling and the opening of the
discontinuity is constant and user-defined. It acts as a pipe.
The last option dissociates the discretization of the longitudinal flow from both
sides of the interface by adding nodes inside the interface. The nodes have only a
single pressure degree of freedom. This method is termed triple-node discretization
Hydro-mechanically Coupled Interface Finite Element 7
[GUI 02, JHA 14, CER 15]. The underlying hypothesis is that the field of pressure is
homogeneous inside the interface. In this case, there are two drops of pressure between
each side of the interface and inside the interface.
Single node
gN
Finite element mesh
Porous medium
Double node
Discontinuity
gN
Triple node
gN
1.1.3. Objectives
The interface finite element is modeled using the zero-thickness approach, which
does not require any remeshing technique. The contact constraint is enforced by
a penalty method that is easy to implement and does not require any additional
unknowns. The mechanical constitutive law ruling the shear behavior is the classical
Coulomb model. The fluid flow problem is solved using a three-node discretization.
The couplings arise from the variation of storage and permeability with gap opening,
8 Deterministic Numerical Modeling of Soil–Structure Interaction
as well as the definition of an effective stress. The purpose of this section is to derive
the main equations of the problem and to formulate the continuum interface problem.
Ω2 e22 x2
x2
e21 t1 Γc2
t2 e11
Γ1t x1 e12
Ω1
E2
Γu1 E1
Γ1c and Γ2c denote both parts of the boundary where contact is likely to occur. In
this area, a local system of coordinates (e11 , e12 , e13 ) is defined along the mortar side
Γ1c , as shown in Figure 1.5, where e11 denotes the normal to the surface. The closest-
point projection x̄1 of a point of x2 of the boundary Γ2c onto Γ1c is defined such that
[WRI 06]
gN = x2 − x̄1 · ē11 , [1.1]
where (ē11 , ē12 , ē13 ) denotes the local system of coordinates at point x̄1 . This function
gN is referred to as the gap function, where the subscript N stands for the normal
direction. If there is no contact between the solids, gN is positive. The contact is
termed ideal if there is no interpenetration of the solids. This can be enforced if
the Lagrange multiplier method is used. However, if the penalty method is used,
interpenetration (negative gap function) is necessary to generate the contact pressure.
The definition of a relative tangential displacement between two points in the plane
of contact has no meaning in the field of large displacement [HAB 98]. Rather, normal
Hydro-mechanically Coupled Interface Finite Element 9
(N) and tangential (T1 and T2) velocities are defined in the local system of coordinates.
They are gathered into the vector ġ such that
where pN is the normal pressure, and τ1 and τ2 are the shear stresses in both directions
in the plane of the interface. The ideal contact constraint is summarized into the
Hertz–Signorini–Moreau condition [WRI 06]:
gN ≥ 0, pN ≥ 0 and pN gN = 0. [1.4]
If there is no contact, the gap function gN is positive and the contact pressure pN
is null. In case of contact, the gap function is null and the contact pressure is positive.
This condition is no longer verified if the penalty method is used. In case of contact,
the relation between the pressure and the gap function can be written as
where the minus sign ensures that the contact pressure is positive when inter-
penetration increases, i.e. gN < 0 and ġN < 0.
The stick and slip states are distinguished by the criterion f (t, q). It depends on the
stress state t and a set of internal variables q. The evolution of the stress state within
the interface depends on the constitutive law described hereafter.
The ideal stick state, ġT = 0, is also regularized by the penalty method, i.e. a
relative displacement is allowed. Therefore, the relation between the shear stress and
the tangential variation of displacement is given by
τ˙i = KT ġT i i = 1, 2. [1.8]
The constitutive law depends only on the stress state t within the interface and a
single parameter, the friction coefficient μ. Mathematically, it can be written as
2 2
f (t, μ) = (τ1 ) + (τ2 ) −μ pN . [1.9]
τ
where τ is the norm of the tangential stresses. The criterion is presented in Figure
1.6. In the absence of contact, the stress state lies on the apex of the criterion. Both
normal pressure and tangential stresses are null, i.e. t = 0. If the combination of
tangential and normal stresses lies below the criterion (f < 0), the tangential state
is considered as stick. Otherwise, if the stress state lies on the criterion (f = 0), the
tangential state is considered as sliding.
where De is equivalent to the elastic compliance tensor. When the interface reaches
the slip state, an elastoplastic compliance tensor Dep is defined such that
⎡ ⎤
−KN 0 0
⎡ ⎤ ⎢ τ1
2
τ1 τ2 ⎥ ⎡ ⎤
ṗN ⎢ (τ1 ) ⎥ ġN
⎢−μ KN KT 1 − −K T ⎥
⎣ τ̇1 ⎦ = ⎢ τ τ 2 τ 2 ⎥ ⎣ ⎦
⎢ ⎥ · ġT,1 .
τ̇2 ⎢ 2 ⎥
⎣ τ2 τ1 τ2 (τ2 ) ⎦ ġ T,2
−μ KN −KT KT 1 −
τ τ 2 τ 2
Dep
[1.11]
This tensor was introduced in [CHA 88], which is based on a non-associated flow
rule.
No contact Stick Slip
pN =0 >0 >0
τ =0 ≥ 0 = μ · pN
||τ|| f>0
Slip state f=0
f<0
No contact
Stick state
μ
pN
But time heals all wounds, and long before the special trolley had
landed the team back at Alton Leonard’s spirits were again at
normal, or perhaps a little beyond normal since, in spite of the
defeat, the Gray-and-Gold had had her big moments, and he had
shared in at least one of them. Disappointment had not prevented
the other members of the squad from giving praise where it was
deserved, and Leonard had heard a number of nice things said. Rus
Emerson had been especially complimentary, and Coach Cade, while
less demonstrative than the players, had expressed his approval
quite unmistakably. So, all in all, Leonard should have been more
than satisfied with the afternoon, it seemed. But he wasn’t, for the
defeat rankled, and Slim’s well-intended but cynical sounding advice
to “forget it and wait until next year” brought little comfort. But in
spite of having failed in their quest of revenge, the team became
quite cheerful, even merry, in fact, before they rolled into Alton, and
so Leonard too regained his spirits. It was almost dark by the time
he and Slim turned into the yard and made their way toward
Haylow, although beyond the buildings the western sky still showed
a tint of faded gold most appropriate to the occasion. The
Sophomore Dinner was set for seven, and it was already well past
five, a fact that Slim mentioned as they reached the front of
Academy Hall.
“I ought to get there a bit early, I suppose,” he added. “There’s
usually something that goes wrong at the last minute, and the other
fellows on the committee probably won’t show up until the last
moment.”
A dim form detached itself from the shadows of the doorway of
Academy once the two had passed and loitered carelessly down the
middle path in the direction of the gate. Neither Slim nor Leonard
saw this, however. But, just as they went up the steps of Haylow,
Leonard laid a detaining hand on his companion’s arm.
“There’s a fellow behind that tree over there by the yellow house,”
said Leonard softly. “You can’t see him now. He poked his head
around just as we started up here.”
Slim looked, but the further side of Meadow street was wrapped in
shadows and the particular tree, seen between the posts of the
entrance, looked no different than other trees. Slim shrugged. “I
don’t see anything, General. Guess it was just a shadow.”
“No, it wasn’t. I saw the fellow’s head plainly.”
“Oh, well, what of it? Probably some kid playing hide-and-seek. I’ll
tell you, though. We’ll have a look from the window at the end of
the corridor. Come on.”
They climbed the stairs and then went along the second floor hall
to the casement that overlooked Meadow street. When they reached
it and peered surreptitiously out and down a dark form was
proceeding townward along the further sidewalk, beyond the tree.
For a brief moment the form was palely lighted as it passed under a
street light, and Slim grunted.
“Guess you were right,” he said. “Looks like one of the freshies.
Keeping tabs on me, I suppose. I wonder if there was anything in
Johnny McGrath’s guff. Just for fun, when we go in the room we’ll
have a look before we light up. There may be more of the varmints
hiding about.”
“What do you suppose they’re up to?” asked Leonard.
“Search me,” said Slim. Then he chuckled. “Maybe they’re going to
kidnap us, General. Wish they’d try it, eh?”
“I guess they’re not interested in me,” replied Leonard a bit
regretfully. “See any one?”
He was looking over Slim’s shoulder, peering from the darkened
window. Outside the Academy yard was black save where the
infrequent lights along the walks shed a dim yellow radiance that
sent elongated shadows of the nearby trees sprawling off into the
gloom. It was a time of evening when most of the fellows were in
the dormitories, and save for a boy who passed under the window,
whistling a football tune, to turn in at the doorway beneath and
come pounding up the stairway, the yard appeared empty. Then Slim
said “Humph!” under his breath.
“What?” asked Leonard eagerly.
“Look along the Doctor’s path about fifty or sixty feet from the
middle path. See anything?”
“N-no,” answered Leonard disappointedly.
“Well, I do. There’s some one under the tree there. Close up to
the trunk and— There! Now he’s moving out a bit! See?”
“Yes!” exclaimed the other watcher excitedly. “What do you
suppose—”
“Silly chumps,” muttered Slim amusedly. “Kid stuff! Oh, well, it
amuses them. He’ll have to leave there pretty soon and go home to
supper, though. That’ll be our chance to give them the slip. What
time is it, anyhow? Turn on the light, will you?”
“Twenty-two of six,” answered Leonard a moment later.
“Plenty of time, then. They can’t get out from supper in much less
than half an hour, and that’ll make it half-past. We’ll be gone by—”
Slim stopped and listened. “Thought I heard some one outside,” he
explained, turning his glance away from the closed door. “I was
going to say that by half-past six we’ll be over at Kingman’s. Gee,
I’m tired, General! How does my eye look?”
“Not so bad,” said Leonard. He felt gingerly of his own nose. “This
thing’s mighty sore yet. Would you do anything to it?”
“Your beak? No, not until we get back again. Bathe it in arnica
then. All it needs now is soap and water.”
The youth who had gone pounding up to the floor above a few
minutes earlier now came thumping down again. The dormitory was
by no means quiet, but the visitor’s passing sounded well above all
else. Slim frowned. “That’s the noisiest brute I ever heard,” he
muttered. He went over to the window and looked down, but all he
could see in the darkness was a dim shape going toward Lykes.
“Must be wearing wooden shoes, from the sound.” He peered in the
direction of the watcher under the tree and then pulled the green
shade down. “I hope your feet are cold out there,” he muttered.
Both boys laid aside the clothes they had worn to New Falmouth,
since, as one never knew just what might occur in the course of a
class celebration, it was customary to wear articles that were not
highly valued. Slim pulled a pair of gray flannel trousers from the
closet and hunted out an old white sweater. Leonard selected a
veteran suit of grayish tweed that, during the past summer, had
served on Sundays and holidays at the farm. They didn’t hurry in
their preparations, since, if only as a joke on the freshman spies,
they meant to time their trip to the village while the enemy was at
supper. Besides, they were both feeling the effects of the game in
the shape of lame muscles and a general disinclination to move
faster than a slow walk.
Six o’clock struck while they were still dawdling and talking lazily
of the afternoon’s experiences, and doors began to open along the
corridors and the dwellers in Haylow set off for Lawrence Hall and
supper. Slim struggled into an old bath-robe and looked around for
his slippers. “I sort of think I’ll be ready to eat, myself, by the time
seven o’clock comes,” he remarked. “Where the dickens is that other
slipper of mine?”
“I’m ready now,” said Leonard. “I hope to goodness nothing
happens to that dinner before I get at it!”
“Don’t worry, General. Nothing’s going to happen to the food. I’ll
bet that right at this minute Kingman is mounting guard down there
with a shot-gun loaded with buckshot!”
“Well, then I hope that nothing happens to keep me from reaching
it,” amended Leonard, smiling.
Slim chuckled. “That’s different,” he said. “I’ll guarantee the feed,
General, but I won’t guarantee the guests. Ah, here you are, you
lopsided old reprobate!” He pulled the missing slipper from under the
further side of his bed and thrust a bare foot into it. “Guess we
might as well wash up,” he announced. “No use cutting it too fine. I
don’t run from trouble, but I don’t hunt for it, either, and maybe
we’ll be just as well off if we get inside that restaurant before the
freshies finish their supper.”
“All right,” assented Leonard. The hall was silent now and the last
footfall had ceased sounding on the pavement below. He picked up
his own robe and threw it over his present scanty costume. At that
instant there was an impatient exclamation from Slim.
“What the dickens is the matter with this door?” Slim demanded
as he turned the knob and pulled. Then, “Look here, where’s the
key?” he asked blankly.
The key was always on the inside of the lock, but it plainly wasn’t
there now. Slim and Leonard both looked about the floor. Then,
together, they seized the knob and pulled hard. The door didn’t
yield.
“Locked!” said Leonard.
Slim nodded, and a broad smile crept over his face. “Locked is
right,” he chuckled. “The little varmints win the first trick, General!”
“But how? There’s been no one here!”
“Remember the fellow with the heavy tread? That’s who, I’ll bet.
Got the tip from the fellow under the tree, or some other fellow, and
made a lot of noise going upstairs and then came down again quiet
and locked us in.”
“But how could he have got the key without our hearing the door
open or—” Leonard blinked. “I see! They put the key in the outside
before we came home!”
Slim nodded. “Or had it in their pocket. Well, we’ve got to get out
somehow. There’s no use raising a riot, for no one will hear us, I
guess. Perhaps if we yelled from the window— But, shucks, I
wouldn’t give those kids the satisfaction! If there was a transom—”
“How about the window?” interrupted Leonard.
“Rather a long drop, General, with a mighty hard landing. Wait a
minute! What fellows of our class are in Haylow? Let’s see. Joe
Conklin’s in Number 27, but that’s upstairs and on the back. He’d
never hear us. He’s probably on his way, too. Who else is there?”
“Wharton, in 4,” said Leonard. “Let’s raise a row and see if
anything happens.”
They did and nothing did happen. After several minutes of
shouting and thumping on the door and banging on the floor with a
shoe they gave it up. “Looks now,” said Slim, “like I wasn’t so smart
in deciding to wait! We’d have been wiser if we’d started earlier!” He
crossed to the window, threw it wide and looked down. “I guess I
can do it,” he murmured. Then he glanced to the right and said,
“Huh, never thought of that!”
Leonard, a shoe in one hand, was still staring perplexedly at the
door when Slim summoned him. “Give me a hand here, General,”
called Slim. “It’s only about five feet to the next window, and I can
make it easy.”
Slim wriggled out of his robe and kicked off his slippers. Leonard
followed him through the window and they stood together on the
broad ledge, each with a hand hooked under the sash. “Glad those
fresh kids aren’t here to see this,” commented Slim. “Get hold of my
wrist and hold it close in to the wall. If anything happens, son, let
go. Don’t try to hold me. But I’ll make it. All right!”
Slim edged to the end of the ledge, and Leonard slowly followed
him. Then, with one hand tight around Slim’s right wrist and the
other holding fast to the sash, Leonard pressed his body close
against the edge of the embrasure while Slim reached out his left
hand for a grip on the stone work about the next window. After a
moment he said: “Give me another inch or two if you can.” Leonard
obeyed. There was a moment of suspense and then Slim
announced: “All right, General. Let go!” Rather fearfully Leonard
released the other’s wrist and turned his head to see. Slim was safe
on the next sill, raising the lower sash. Then he disappeared, and
Leonard climbed back into Number 12. A moment later the door of
the next room opened and Slim’s bare feet padded along the
corridor. A key turned in the lock in front of Leonard and the door
swung in.
“Left the key in the lock,” panted Slim as he entered. “Say, we’ll
have to do some hurrying, General! Must be getting close to half-
past.”
They hustled off to the lavatory and hustled back again and
hurriedly donned their clothes. Leonard looked at his watch the
instant before he put the light out. The hands pointed to twenty-four
minutes after six.
Below, in the half-light of the doorway, Slim paused and looked
about inquiringly. There was no one in sight. But as they turned side
by side into the middle path that led toward Academy street voices
behind them announced that some of the fellows had finished
supper and were returning to the dormitories. At the far end of the
row, Borden Hall, the freshman dormitory, showed an occasional
light, but, so far as either Slim or Leonard could see, no forms were
about the entrance. They went on toward the gate, Slim chuckling
softly.
“Guess we beat them to it, after all,” he said.
But a minute later Slim changed his mind.
CHAPTER XVII
SLIM RETREATS
On Market street Slim led the way into a drug store and slipped
onto a stool in front of the white marble counter where two aproned
youths were dispensing drinks. “We’ve got to cook up some
scheme,” he said, “and we might as well be comfortable while we’re
at it. What’s yours?”
“Mine’s a good dinner,” answered Leonard wistfully.
“You’re in the wrong shop, General, but you can have a sandwich
if you say the word.”
Leonard looked longingly at the two tiers of sandwiches under the
glass cover nearby. “You?” he asked.
Slim shook his head sternly. “No, sir, I’m going to dine at
Kingman’s in about ten minutes.”
Leonard sighed and mentioned his choice of a beverage. The
renunciation was difficult. When their glasses were in front of them
Slim lifted his gravely. “Here’s luck,” he said.
“Success to our scheme,” replied Leonard, and drank deeply. The
concoction tasted good and he imbibed again and felt better. He
glanced at Slim. Slim was staring hard at the counter and absently
tracing a design on its smooth surface. The clock at the end of the
store, above the prescription counter, proclaimed three minutes past
seven. Leonard looked out through the big glass window and sought
inspiration. The sidewalks were well thronged, for the evening was
mild for November. A big yellow trolley car passed with a strident
clanging of its gong. Automobiles went by honking warningly to the
rash pedestrians who sought to find their way across the street. A
smart looking policeman, his fingers crooked in his belt, paused
momentarily to view the contents of the window and then continued
on his beat. Leonard had found his inspiration.
“Slim, look here,” he exclaimed. “Why can’t we get a cop to put us
through that mob back there? I just saw one go by. If we told him
how it was—”
But Slim looked instantly disapproving. “That wouldn’t be playing
the game,” he answered. “You—you don’t call on the cops to help
you, General. It isn’t done.”
“That wouldn’t be playing the game,” he answered
ebookmasss.com