Pms Toyo
Pms Toyo
Pms Toyo
on quality. 6) Standardized tasks are the foundation for continuous improvement and employee empowerment. Predictability is needed for consistency within the system. However, encourage employee creativity in problem-solving to improve the system. 7) Use visual control so no problems are hidden. Reports should be limited to one piece of paper. Avoid computer screens that distract from the real work being done. 8) Use only reliable, thoroughly tested technology that serves your people and processes. Efficiency is challenged if there are equipment problems or redundancies. What works trumps what's new. 9) Grow leaders who thoroughly understand the work, live the philosophy, and teach it to others. Leaders are grown from within rather than purchased from without. 10) Develop exceptional people and teams who follow your company's philosophy. This means painstakingly developing a culture that adheres to the correct philosophy, and encouraging teamwork. 11) Respect your extended network of partners and suppliers by challenging them and helping them improve. Respect is setting high standards for your partners, and them helping them achieve them. 12) Go and see for yourself to thoroughly understand the situation.Management has to go and see problems for themselves in order to make good decisions. When possible, information should not be mediated through others, but seen for oneself. 13) Make decisions slowly by consensus, thoroughly considering all options; implement decisions rapidly. Thoroughly consider alternatives and build consensus with all involved, then aggressively pursue what has been chosen. 14) Become a learning organization through relentless reflection and continuous improvement. Design processes for transparency, to highlight errors and allow for improvement. Use reflection after projects to identify shortomings. Standardize the best practices. Lean processes are implemented by tools such as value-stream mapping and 5S (Sort, straighten, shine, standardize, sustain). However, real change within an organization requires cultural change, and an organic embrace of the Toyota Way. If only the tools are used, change will be short-term and ineffective. Discussion I see several connections between this and Risk Management. The idea of making processes transparent so that errors are quickly found echoes Reason's ideas about opaque systems and latent errors. The discussion of valuing individual creativity in improving procedures connects with the RM idea of valuing employee input when operations are carried out, to avoid error. In both systems, employees are encouraged to think critically about the system. They are masters of the system, and not vice-versa. The fact that Toyota pulls off the difficult feat of balancing profit and quality suggests that there might be a third way in high-risk systems. If profit and quality can be produced without compromise, and if other seemingly opposed goals can be met as in the Lexus production, why not safety and production? Perhaps seeing the two as a binary is too one-dimensional.