Scribd
Upload
24 views1 page

CACS Lab Rubrics 70 M

The document outlines a rubric for evaluating lab work, detailing criteria for assessment across various parameters including aim, code/procedure, results and discussion, viva voice, and record evaluation. Each parameter is assigned a specific mark range based on the quality of work, from 'Excellent' to 'Poor'. The total possible marks for the lab work evaluation is 70.

Uploaded by

Abhishek Dash
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
24 views1 page

CACS Lab Rubrics 70 M

The document outlines a rubric for evaluating lab work, detailing criteria for assessment across various parameters including aim, code/procedure, results and discussion, viva voice, and record evaluation. Each parameter is assigned a specific mark range based on the quality of work, from 'Excellent' to 'Poor'. The total possible marks for the lab work evaluation is 70.

Uploaded by

Abhishek Dash
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

SOFTWARE BASED LABS

Roll No& Year of study:___________________________________Date: ______________

Name of the Lab:__________________________________________

Rubrics for Evaluation of Lab work


Evaluation Marks
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Parameter scored
States the Aim clearly and
States Aim of the States Aim but is
completely. Includes No Aim or
Aim, input lab clearly with unclear and/or has
theory needed to objective is
data(5M) minor errors or a major error or
understand the included.
omissions. omissions.
experiments (0 M)
(3 M) (2M)
(5 M)
Data is presented in Data is not
Code is accurate and written form but no presented
Code/Procedure/ complete and labeled Minor errors or tables or charts inaccurately or is
Sequence of Steps Calculations clearly and omissions and/or major errors missing.
(25 M) correctly shown. (15M) .Very few Calculations are
(25 M) calculations. missing.
(10 M) (4 M)
Analysis
Brief and/or major
Discussion is detailed and Somewhat questions
Results and errors or omissions
includes the relationship detailed and/or responses are
Discussion & Overall, section is
between data. Results with minor errors or missing
conclusion not very thoroughly
units. omissions. completely, No
(15M) done.
(15M) (10M) results
(7M)
(0M)
Answers 50% of Answers 25% of Doesn’t answer
Viva Voice Answers all questions
questions questions any question –
(15M) (15M)
(10M) (6M) (0M)
50% of
Record Experiments 25% of Experiments Doesn’t have
Record
evaluation evaluated in evaluated in time Record
(10M)
(10M) time (1M) (0M)
(2M)

(70) (40) (26) (4)


Total Marks- 70 M

Evaluator’s Name & Signature with date:

You might also like