Vivek Kumar
Vivek Kumar
Abstract—In this paper, a new bi-objective control technique is electrical power; and as a result, the overload is supplied by the
proposed for the load frequency control in microgrids. The first spinning reserve generation capacity. The spinning reserve is the
objective is to set the system frequency to its desired value despite total amount of generation available from all units synchronized
uncertainties in the system inertia and damping caused mainly
by the penetration of renewable energy sources. The employed (i.e., spinning) on the system, minus the present load and losses
strategy to address this objective is based on the virtual inertia being supplied [1], [2]. To secure safe system operation and a
concept. The second objective is to design an automatic mechanism possibility of activating the primary control, the system operator
for charging/discharging of the battery storage units. By achieving must have an adequate spinning reserve at its disposal [3], [4],
this objective, it is possible to attain a compromise between the main [5].
mechanical units and the backup units to participate in supplying
the load. The strategy to address this objective is to estimate the In modern power grids, with increasing penetration of dis-
load change and then design a controller to track this signal by the tributed generation (DG) sources, the moments of inertia and
mechanical units. A multivariable observer-based proportional- inertia constant of the whole system decrease; and consequently,
integral (PI) controller is designed to simultaneously achieve both the system sensitivity to disturbances, caused by load changes
objectives. Applying the proposed method not only compensates and deviations in the DGs production, increases [3], [6]. Another
for the adverse effects of the uncertainties and disturbances, but
it also decreases the needed capacity of energy storage resources. challenge in modern power grids is the variability of the inertia
Simulation results show that the proposed method can improve since the power generated by DGs is highly dependent on
the microgrid load frequency characteristic while robust stability environmental and climatic conditions. Therefore, conventional
and performance are guaranteed with the limited energy storage control methods used in traditional power grids may not attain
capacity. the desirable performance of a modern power grid such as
Index Terms—Backup system control, load frequency control, microgrids.
microgrid, multivariable virtual inertia control. The utilization of energy storage devices (ESDs) and inverter-
interfaced distributed generators (IIDGs) is a viable option for
enhancing the system frequency, and the virtual inertia con-
I. INTRODUCTION
trol represents an alternative methodology for attaining this
N AC power systems with synchronous generating units,
I the quality of the frequency and active power control are
affected by the rotor moment of inertia. Frequency stability
objective. Numerous technologies exist for the implementation
of an energy storage system, such as batteries, flywheels, su-
perconducting magnetic energy storage, and supercapacitors.
and control are essential for the safe operation of power grids, Among the available candidates for energy storage units in
which are closely related to the balance of active power between energy storage systems, supercapacitors have the advantages
generation and consumption. If the electrical load increases of high power density and long lifetime [7], hence the focus
suddenly, the electrical power output exceeds the mechanical of this paper is on supercapacitors, although the same concepts
input power. This power shortage is compensated by the kinetic can be applied to other energy storage systems as well. The
energy of the rotating system. A decrease in the kinetic energy concept of virtual inertia refers to the immediate injection of
causes the turbine to decelerate resulting in a reduction of the additional active power into the power grid in the case of an
system frequency. When the governor senses these changes, the active power imbalance leading to an increase in the frequency,
steam inlet valve opens to balance the mechanical power and the which is made possible by a suitable control algorithm [3], [8].
The general approach for developing virtual inertia control is to
Manuscript received 29 June 2023; revised 13 October 2023; accepted 19 focus on the synchronous generators dynamics as represented
November 2023. Date of publication 28 November 2023; date of current ver- by an oscillation equation, and applying the concept of a vir-
sion 20 June 2024. Paper no. TPWRS-01005-2023. (Corresponding author:
Yazdan Batmani.)
tual synchronous generator (VSG) [8]. Additional dynamics
Ali Rafiee, Yazdan Batmani, and Hassan Bevrani are with the Department of synchronous generators, including primary and secondary
of Electrical Engineering, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj 66177-15175, Iran control loop dynamics, rotor damper wiring dynamics, and
(e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]).
Ali Mehrizi-Sani is with the Bradley Department of Electrical and Com-
stator wiring dynamics, have been suggested in previous lit-
puter Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0131 USA (e-mail: erature [9], [10]. Recently, numerous studies are conducted in
[email protected]). the field of virtual inertia control (for example, robust control
Color versions of one or more figures in this article are available at
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2023.3336692.
methods [11], [12], [13], adaptive control methods [14], [15],
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TPWRS.2023.3336692 integral control method [16], optimal control methods [17],
0885-8950 © 2023 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission.
See https://www.ieee.org/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur. Downloaded on January 23,2025 at 12:09:45 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
5982 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, VOL. 39, NO. 4, JULY 2024
The transfer function of the virtual inertial control loop has the
following general form that can encompass all the dynamics of
the controller and power converter.
bm sm + bm−1 sm−1 + · · · + b1 s + b0
C(s) = (3)
sn + an−1 sn−1 + · · · + a1 s + a0
As previously mentioned, a robust virtual inertia controller
aims to decrease the sensitivity of the closed-loop system S(s),
which is typically achieved by setting a high DC gain value for
the transfer function, denoted as C(0). However, the following
analysis indicates that using a high DC gain value for shaping
the virtual inertia control loop may limit the system’s ability Fig. 2. Interface topology used to regulate the power flow between the ESD
and microgrid.
to effectively utilize its spinning reserve generation capacity.
To explore this issue, let us compute the transfer function from
ΔP0 (s) to the mechanical power change ΔPm (s) as follows:
ΔPm (s) 1 s+βRKi
= × . (4)
ΔP0 (s) sR(1+sτg )(1+sτt ) (2Hs+D)+C(s)
The steady-state participation of the spinning reserve generation
units can be determined by applying the final value theorem
based on (4) as follows:
Fig. 3. Bidirectional DC–DC topology used in the ESSC.
ΔPm βKi
= . (5)
ΔP0 D + C(0)
emergency control are out of the scope of this paper and are not
Using (5) and the fact that C(0) is large, it can be concluded analyzed here.
that the spinning reserve generation units have a minor role in
responding to active power balance changes. For example, when III. PROPOSED TITO CONTROLLER
applying the robust controllers designed in [11], since C(0) =
By delivering short and instantaneous energy injections, this
1.82 × 103 and using (5), the ratio of the spinning reserve
paper focuses on enhancing the effectiveness of ESDs, specif-
generation power change to the load change is 6.44 × 10−5 .
ically supercapacitors, to improve the frequency performance
Therefore, almost all the overload must be supplied by the ESD,
of microgrids comprised of small local thermal power plants
and we need a high-capacity storage source. From a practical
or diesel generators and IIDGs. The interface topology used to
point of view, however, the ESDs have limited capacity. If the
regulate the power flow between the ESD and the microgrid
overload remains for long periods of time or when successive
consists of an energy storage side converter (ESSC) connected
overloads present even with short inter intervals, the power of
to the microgrid via a DC-link and a grid side converter (GSC)
the ESDs constantly decrease in the absence of the spinning
is shown in Fig. 2. The presence of the DC-link permits a
reserve generation contribution. In this situation, the frequency
degree of decoupling between the ESSC and GSC, allowing
regulation is not successfully achieved; and consequently, the
each controller design to be independently conducted.
overall system performance decreases.
The ESSC controller regulates the exchange of energy be-
Based on the above discussion, the following two main ob-
tween the ESD and the DC-link. The bidirectional DC/DC
jectives should be simultaneously addressed by a proper control
configuration, used to implement the ESSC, is depicted in Fig. 3.
structure:
r Objective #1: The system frequency should be regulated In this case, VDC is always higher than VESD , but energy can flow
in either direction. This converter can operate in the buck mode,
to its desired value despite uncertainty in the total inertia
which supplies energy to the storage device. The converter can
constant and damping coefficient as well as external dis-
also operate in the boost mode, which draws energy from the
turbances caused by the load changes and DGs variations.
r Objective #2: The spinning reserve generation units storage device. The following unified model can be utilized to
mathematically characterize these two operational modes:
should be excited to enable them to effectively contribute
in supplying the overload. VESD VDC
I˙L = − + Sw ,
Remark 1: In the case of a severe fault or a significant loss LESD LESD
of generation, the frequency may continue to decline until the IL
system experiences a frequency collapse. In such cases, it is V̇ESD = , (6)
CESD
necessary to activate the atypical operations of tertiary control,
emergency control (e.g., underfrequency load shedding), and where Sw1 = Sw , Sw2 = S̄w . The overline symbol is used to
protection mechanisms to reduce the likelihood of cascading represent the logical opposite state, i.e., if Sw = 1, then S̄w = 0.
failures, load or grid/network separation events, and additional In the power control mode, the control developed in [23] ensures
generation events [1], [3], [5]. However, the tertiary control and that the power transferred to/from the grid is controlled to track
Authorized licensed use limited to: Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur. Downloaded on January 23,2025 at 12:09:45 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
5984 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, VOL. 39, NO. 4, JULY 2024
∗
the power reference PESD using the control IL such that the
voltage of the capacitor bank does not exceed its acceptable
range VESDmin < VESD < VESDmax . In this situation, the closed loop
dynamics of the ESSC system is obtained as follows [23]:
IL3
I˙L = − ∗ ,
PESD CESD
∗
IL PESD
V̇ESD = = , (7) Fig. 5. Low inertia microgrid.
CESD VESD CESD
where VESD and CESD are the voltage and capacity of the super- ∗
capacitors, respectively. The GSC controller regulates VDC re- where PESD is the reference power for the ESD; τGSC is the time
garding the output power flow to maintain the DC-link’s energy constant of the grid side converter, that is displayed with τVI to
balance. The GSC control typically employs a phase locked-loop integrate this topic.
(PLL) that generates the grid frequency and phase-angle for As depicted in Fig. 5, the low inertia microgrid can consist
the dq-frame current control, as well as the outer voltage-loop of local thermal power plants or diesel generators and two types
and the inner current-loop controllers. More details on the GSC of IIDGs systems. The first type is grid-imposed frequency
control can be found in [7], [24]. However, the power tracking IIDGs such as photovoltaic (PV) and wind turbine generator
model of the GSC is used in the power-frequency synthesis and (WTG) systems, in which the operating frequency is prede-
analysis. The typical active power control loop of the GSC is termined and imposed by the AC grid [29]. The presence of
shown in Fig. 4 [25] where ωf is the cut-off angular frequency these resources decreases the system’s moment of inertia. The
of the low-pass filter; ω and δ are the angular frequency and second type of IIDGs is controlled-frequency IIDGs such as fuel
power angle, respectively; P and P ∗ are the active power cell (FC) systems, flywheel energy storage systems (FESS), and
and its reference, respectively. The gains Kp = ΔωMAX /Pn and battery energy storage systems (BESS), in which the operating
Kpd = 3Vn2 /X represent the frequency droop coefficient and the frequency is not determined by the grid but rather by the IIDGs
amplification from the change in δ to the change in the active system itself [29]. The presence of controlled-frequency IIDGs
power, respectively. ΔωMAX is the maximum allowable angular increases the system inertia, and consequently, the microgrid
frequency deviation; Pn is the nominal active power; X = ωLs performance [10]. These sources can adjust their power output
is the impedance of the line inductor Ls . The transfer function in response to changes in the microgrid frequency. As the pro-
from P ∗ to P can be derived from Fig. 4 as follows: posed controller is robust against uncertainties, it is expected
that the controller can maintain its performance in the absence
P 1 and presence of both of these resources (see Scenario 1). More
∗
= , (8)
P τp (τω s + 1)s + 1 precisely, the following two types of uncertainty can be handled
where τp = X/3Kp Vn2 = X pu /ΔωMAX and τω = 1/ωf . The by the controller:
r Input disturbance ΔP0 : It refers to changes in the active
time constant τp is proportional to the per-unit output inductance
of the GSC, and the time constant τω is equal to the inverse of power balance, which can be defined as a decrease in
the low-pass filter’s cut-off frequency. ωf is typically one decade power generation or an increase in power demand. This
below 50 Hz, and ΔωMAX 1 [25], [26], [27]. As a result, the disturbance is depicted in Fig. 5 as the total effects of the
condition 0 < τω τp often holds, and (8) can be simplified as first type of IIDGs and load changes.
r Unknown dynamics of the system: This uncertainty arises
follows:
due to ignoring the dynamics of the second type of IIDGs.
P 1
= . (9) The proposed controller does not use the positive impacts
P∗ τp s + 1 of these resources in improving the frequency restoration
Based on (7) and (9), in the power tracking mode, the ESD of the microgrid.
dynamics can be characterised by [28] The constant of inertia and the damping coefficient depend
∗
PESD on the penetration of IIDGs; and thus, both of the above sources
V̇ESD = , of uncertainties change these two parameters.
VESD CESD
To address both of the defined objectives in Section II, we
∗
PESD − PESD propose a novel disturbance observer-based control method in
ṖESD = , (10)
τGSC which the whole system is considered as a TITO system. Fig. 6
Authorized licensed use limited to: Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur. Downloaded on January 23,2025 at 12:09:45 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
RAFIEE et al.: LOAD FREQUENCY CONTROL IN MICROGRIDS: A ROBUST BI-OBJECTIVE VIRTUAL DYNAMICS TECHNIQUE 5985
TABLE I
USED PARAMETERS IN THE STUDIED MICROGRID
Authorized licensed use limited to: Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur. Downloaded on January 23,2025 at 12:09:45 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
5986 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, VOL. 39, NO. 4, JULY 2024
⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤
ż(t) 0 −F1 −F2 z(t) I2
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎣ 1 ⎦
ẋ (t) = ⎣ 0 A11 A12 ⎦ ⎣x1 (t)⎦ + ⎣ 0 ⎦ r(t) (15)
ẋ2 (t) gB2 KI A21 − gB2 KP F1 A22 − gB2 KP F2 x2 (t) gB2 KP
⎡ ⎤
z(t)
⎢ ⎥
y(t) = 0 I2 0 ⎣x1 (t)⎦
x2 (t)
⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤
A11 − A12 F−1 A12 F−1
2 F1 0 0 2
ẋs (t) ⎢ ⎥ xs (t) ⎢ ⎥
=⎣ 0 −K−1
P KI 0 ⎦ +⎣ 0 ⎦ r(t)
ẋf (t) xf (t)
0 0 −gB2 KP F2 gB2 KP
xs (t)
y(t) = I2 0 0 (16)
xf (t)
Authorized licensed use limited to: Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur. Downloaded on January 23,2025 at 12:09:45 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
RAFIEE et al.: LOAD FREQUENCY CONTROL IN MICROGRIDS: A ROBUST BI-OBJECTIVE VIRTUAL DYNAMICS TECHNIQUE 5987
and we have the following full rank solution for F2 : locations in the left-half-plane (LHP) of the s-plane [32]. In
this situation, the stability of the estimation error is guaranteed
0.135 1.506 ˙
since ẽ(t) = (A − LC )ẽ(t) is stable; and hence, ẽ(t) asymp-
F2 = .
0.675 0.301 totically tends to zero. Paying attention to the dominant poles
of the closed-loop system with the designed TITO PI controller,
For the above values, the eigenvalues of A11 − A12 F−1
2 F1 L is selected such that the first four observer poles are placed at
are −5 and −3.33. By tuning σ1 = 10σ2 = 10 and α = 50, the
−95, −85, −40, and −20. The last pole of the observer is also
controller gains are computed as follows:
located at −1. The obtained observer gain is as follows:
−0.215 0.107 −10.791 5.396 T
KP = , KI = . 129.248 −3.034 −17.034 −0.001 −593.893
6.917 −0.138 345.833 −6.917 L 1=
−4.303 93.667 162.536 0.024 82.485
The other eigenvalues of the system, i.e., the second and last
parts, are placed in −50, −50, −100, and −1000; and therefore, Remark 2: It is also possible to select the last pole of the
the asymptotic stability of the closed-loop system is guaranteed. observer far away from the imagery axis. In this situation, the
The second objective, i.e., tracking a step-kind reference signal, convergence rate of the obtained observer and as a result its
is also guaranteed due to the presence of non-zero integral action frequency bandwidth are increased. Adverse effects of noises
in the control structure. on the closed-loop system, however, may be intensified.
As mentioned earlier, the TITO high-gain PI controller is In this section, the performance of the proposed TITO con-
designed such that the system output tracks specific reference troller is investigated using simulations of a microgrid test
signals. While the first output, i.e., Δf , must be set to zero, system comprising 15 MW of domestic loads, 12 MW of thermal
the second output ΔPm must track changes in the active power power plant, 7 MW of wind farm, 4 MW of solar farm, 2 MW
balance. Therefore, the designed TITO controller can be imple- fuel cell energy storage system, and 3 MW of electrical and
mented in practice provided that ΔP0 is available. Nevertheless, mechanical energy storage system. The system base is 20 MW.
due to its nature, ΔP0 is unknown to the controller. In this Assume that the PVs of the solar farm and wind farm turbines
subsection, a dynamic observer is employed to compute an are connected to the DC sides of the IIDGs as a DC power
estimation of the load change, shown as d(t). source. The real and reactive power control of the IIDGs in a
Since the load may change slowly; and therefore, it is assumed given situation could be either current or voltage control mode,
˙ = 0. Augmenting this dynamic with (11) leads to the
that d(t) as discussed in detail in [26], [29], [34], and it is concluded that
following state-space representation: by effectively regulating the voltage on the DC side, the response
of the output power to the input reference power can be modeled
A Bd B as a first-order transfer function, with the time constant τ as a
Ẋ (t) = X (t) + u(t),
01×4 0 01×2 variable that can be adjusted to meet design requirements. The
microgrid parameters are presented in Table I.
A B 1) Effects of Unmodeled Dynamics: As previously stated
y(t) = C 02×1 X (t), (18) and for the aim of simplicity, the dynamics of FC, BESS,
and FESS are not considered in the design procedure of the
C proposed controller. It is assumed that the load is increased
0.1 pu at t = 0.1 s. The frequency and ESD power variations
where X (t) = [x (t), d(t)]T ∈ R5 is the augmented state
T
in the presence and absence of the aforementioned sources are
vector. If the pair (A , C ) is observable, a full-order Lu-
depicted in Fig. 8(a) and (b), respectively. As can be seen, these
enberger observer can be used to estimate the load change
sources have a positive impact on the system’s performance due
d(t) by measuring Δf (t) and ΔPm (t). To check the state
to their negative feedback control loops. However, these effects
observability of this pair, the observability matrix O =
are minor, and we can conclude that the ESD controlled by the
[C T , (CA )T , (C A 2 )T , (C A 3 )T , (C A 4 )T ] is computed,
proposed method provides almost all required power to achieve
and since it is full rank, (A , C ) is fully state observable. Now,
power balancing.
let X̂ (t) shows the estimation of the augmented state X (t).
1) Base Scenario: In this scenario, a simulation is done to
Selecting the Luenberger observer
investigate the fundamental properties of the proposed control
˙
X̂ (t) = A X̂ (t) + B u(t) + L y(t) − C X̂ (t) , (19) structure. For the aim of comparison, two single-input-single-
output (SISO) robust controllers, designed using the quantitative
the problem is to find the observer gain L ∈ R5×2 such that feedback theory (QFT) [10] and the H∞ method [11], are
the estimation error ẽ(t) = X (t) − X̂ (t) asymptotically con- considered. For the nominal values of the system parameters
verges to zero. This aim is attained if A − LC is a Hurwitz and when the load changes ±0.1 pu at t = 0.1 s, Fig. 9(a)
matrix, i.e., all of its eigenvalues have strictly negative real parts. and (b) depict the system frequency deviation. The frequency
Since (A , C ) is observable, it is possible to find L such that nadir and the maximal RoCoF as two important indices for
all the eigenvalues of A − LC are placed in predetermined evaluating the performance of these controllers are presented in
Authorized licensed use limited to: Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur. Downloaded on January 23,2025 at 12:09:45 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
5988 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, VOL. 39, NO. 4, JULY 2024
Fig. 10. Basic scenario: (a) Change in active power balance and estimation of
Fig. 8. Effects of FC, BESS, and FESS (a) Δf (t), (b) ΔPESD (t). its value, (b) ΔPESD (t) and ΔPm (t) in TITO control.
Fig. 11. Basic scenario: (a) ΔPESD (t), (b) ΔPm (t) in SISO control.
Fig. 9. Comparison results: (a) ΔP0 = 0.1 pu, (b) ΔP0 = −0.1 pu.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur. Downloaded on January 23,2025 at 12:09:45 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
RAFIEE et al.: LOAD FREQUENCY CONTROL IN MICROGRIDS: A ROBUST BI-OBJECTIVE VIRTUAL DYNAMICS TECHNIQUE 5989
Fig. 14. Effects of DER trip: (a) Δf (t), (b) ΔPm (t) and ΔPESD (t).
Fig. 12. Uncertainties in H and D: (a) Δf (t), (b) ΔPm (t) and ΔPESD (t).
Fig. 13. ESD charge and discharge modes: (a) Δf (t), (b) ΔPm (t) and
ΔPESD (t).
and wind farms. The purpose of this scenario is to verify the [12] J. Ma, Z. Song, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhao, and J. S. Thorp, “Robust stochastic
effectiveness of the suggested estimate technique for precisely stability analysis method of DFIG integration on power system consid-
ering virtual inertia control,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 32, no. 5,
determining the power imbalance when faced with entirely ran- pp. 4069–4079, Sep. 2017.
dom disturbances and noise. Fig. 15(a) illustrates the changes in [13] T. Kerdphol, F. S. Rahman, M. Watanabe, and Y. Mitani, “Robust virtual
the power balance within this state, along with the corresponding inertia control of a low inertia microgrid considering frequency measure-
ment effects,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 57550–57560, 2019.
estimation of these changes. Fig. 15(b) illustrates the estimation [14] X. Hou, Y. Sun, X. Zhang, J. Lu, P. Wang, and J. M. Guerrero, “Improve-
error, providing verification of the appropriate operation of the ment of frequency regulation in VSG-based AC microgrid via adaptive vir-
estimator. Fig. 15(c) illustrates the variations in frequency, and tual inertia,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 1589–1602,
Feb. 2020.
Fig. 15(d) depicts the power exchange between the storage [15] F. Wang, L. Zhang, X. Feng, and H. Guo, “An adaptive control strategy
source and the thermal unit within the microgrid, with the for virtual synchronous generator,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 54, no. 5,
objective of achieving power balance. pp. 5124–5133, Sep./Oct. 2018.
[16] K. Jiang, H. Su, H. Lin, K. He, H. Zeng, and Y. Che, “A practical secondary
frequency control strategy for virtual synchronous generator,” IEEE Trans.
VI. CONCLUSION Smart Grid, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 2734–2736, May 2020.
[17] M. M. Manaz and C.-N. Lu, “Optimal switched mode control to synthesize
In this paper, by defining a bi-objective control problem and dynamic frequency response from virtual synchronous machine in islanded
introducing a two-input-two-output (TITO) control strategy, a microgrid operation,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 51, no. 28, pp. 610–615,
Jan. 2018.
novel unified solution has been proposed for the load frequency [18] N. Xu, Y. Wang, M. Li, W. Wang, N. Wang, and J. Li, “An optimal control
control problem in modern power systems. The first control method of virtual angular acceleration to improve transient response based
objective is the system’s ability to restore its frequency to the on virtual synchronous generator,” in Proc. IEEE 3rd Int. Future Energy
Electron. Conf. Asia, 2017, pp. 1559–1563.
desired value. The second objective is to design an automatic [19] K.-H. Tan, F.-J. Lin, C.-M. Shih, and C.-N. Kuo, “Intelligent control
mechanism to address the need for cooperation between the main of microgrid with virtual inertia using recurrent probabilistic wavelet
power source unit and the ESD in supplying loads. These objec- fuzzy neural network,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 35, no. 7,
pp. 7451–7464, Jul. 2020.
tives have been robustly attained by employing the proposed [20] F. Yao, J. Zhao, X. Li, L. Mao, and K. Qu, “RBF neural network based
TITO high-gain PI controller with two important properties. virtual synchronous generator control with improved frequency stability,”
The first one is that the primary, secondary, and virtual inertia IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 4014–4024, Jun. 2021.
[21] C. Zheng, T. Dragicevic, and F. Blaabjerg, “Model predictive control based
control loops have been simultaneously designed. The second virtual inertia emulator for an islanded ac microgrid,” IEEE Trans. Ind.
property is the ability of the method to create an automatic charg- Electron., vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 7167–7177, Aug. 2021.
ing/discharging control mechanism for the ESD. According to [22] T. Kerdphol, F. S. Rahman, Y. Mitani, K. Hongesombut, and S. Küfeoğlu,
“Virtual inertia control-based model predictive control for microgrid
the obtained results, the proposed TITO control strategy has frequency stabilization considering high renewable energy integration,”
decreased the required capacity of the backup unit. Through Sustainability, vol. 9, no. 5, Mar. 2017, Art. no. 773.
some simulated scenarios, the effectiveness of the proposed [23] F. A. Inthamoussou, J. Pegueroles-Queralt, and F. D. Bianchi, “Control of
a supercapacitor energy storage system for microgrid applications,” IEEE
control strategy has been proved. Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 690–697, Sep. 2013.
[24] J. Fang, H. Li, Y. Tang, and F. Blaabjerg, “Distributed power system virtual
REFERENCES inertia implemented by grid-connected power converters,” IEEE Trans.
Power Electron., vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 8488–8499, Oct. 2018.
[1] H. Bevrani, Robust Power System Frequency Control. Berlin, Germany: [25] X. Guo, Z. Lu, B. Wang, X. Sun, L. Wang, and J. M. Guerrero, “Dynamic
Springer, 2014. phasors-based modeling and stability analysis of droop-controlled invert-
[2] A. J. Wood, B. F. Wollenberg, and G. B. Sheblé, Power Generation, ers for microgrid applications,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 5, no. 6,
Operation, and Control. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2013. pp. 2980–2987, Nov. 2014.
[3] J. Machowski, Z. Lubosny, J. W. Bialek, and J. R. Bumby, Power System [26] A. Rafiee, Y. Batmani, A. Mehrizi-Sani, T. Kato, and H. Bevrani,
Dynamics: Stability and Control. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2020. “Zero-level control design in AC microgrids: A robust multivariable
[4] A. Ahmadi-Khatir, M. Bozorg, and R. Cherkaoui, “Probabilistic spinning approach,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 8394–8405,
reserve provision model in multi-control zone power system,” IEEE Trans. Jul. 2023.
Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 2819–2829, Aug. 2013. [27] Q.-C. Zhong, Power Electronics-Enabled Autonomous Power Systems:
[5] P. Kundur, Power System Stability. New York, NY, USA: CRC Press, 2007. Next Generation Smart Grids. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2020.
[6] S. Zhang, Y. Mishra, and M. Shahidehpour, “Fuzzy-logic based frequency [28] J. Pegueroles-Queralt, F. D. Bianchi, and O. Gomis-Bellmunt, “A power
controller for wind farms augmented with energy storage systems,” IEEE smoothing system based on supercapacitors for renewable distributed
Trans. Power Syst., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 1595–1603, Mar. 2016. generation,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 343–350,
[7] J. Fang, H. Li, Y. Tang, and F. Blaabjerg, “On the inertia of future Jan. 2015.
more-electronics power systems,” IEEE Trans. Emerg. Sel. Topics Power [29] A. Yazdani and R. Iravani, Voltage-Sourced Converters in Power Systems:
Electron., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 2130–2146, Dec. 2019. Modeling, Control, and Applications. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2010.
[8] X. Meng, J. Liu, and Z. Liu, “A generalized droop control for grid- [30] S. Skogestad and I. Postlethwaite, Multivariable Feedback Control: Anal-
supporting inverter based on comparison between traditional droop control ysis and Design. New York: Wiley, vol. 2, 2007.
and virtual synchronous generator control,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., [31] Y. Wan, T. Keviczky, and M. Verhaegen, “Fault estimation filter design
vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 5416–5438, Jun. 2019. with guaranteed stability using Markov parameters,” IEEE Trans. Autom.
[9] J. Liu, Y. Miura, H. Bevrani, and T. Ise, “A unified modeling method of Control, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 1132–1139, Apr. 2018.
virtual synchronous generator for multi-operation-mode analyses,” IEEE [32] R. C. Dorf and R. H. Bishop, Modern Control Systems. London, U.K.:
Trans. Emerg. Sel. Topics Power Electron., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 2394–2409, Pearson, 2011.
Apr. 2021. [33] D. B. Ridgely, S. S. Banda, and J. J. D’Azzo, “Decoupling of high-gain
[10] A. Rafiee, Y. Batmani, F. Ahmadi, and H. Bevrani, “Robust load-frequency multivariable tracking systems,” J. Guid., Control, Dyn., vol. 8, no. 1,
control in islanded microgrids: Virtual synchronous generator concept and pp. 44–49, May 2012.
quantitative feedback theory,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 36, no. 6, [34] A. Rafiee, Y. Batmani, H. Bevrani, and T. Kato, “Robust MIMO controller
pp. 5408–5416, Nov. 2021. design for VSC-based microgrids: Sequential loop closing concept and
[11] T. Kerdphol, F. S. Rahman, M. Watanabe, and Y. Mitani, Virtual Inertia quantitative feedback theory,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 13, no. 1,
Synthesis and Control. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2021. pp. 129–138, Jan. 2022.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur. Downloaded on January 23,2025 at 12:09:45 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.