C Decision-Making Techniques
C Decision-Making Techniques
Products/markets to be in
Investment decisions
Strategic Planning for environmental changes
planning Identifying competitive advantage
(BOD)
Obtained and used resources effectively and
efficiently
Tactical management Implementing strategic decisions
(middle level of Preparing annual budgets
Recruiting staff
management)
- Costs:
+ Pre-implementation/development costs + Initial set-up costs (licensing, installing)
+ Data conversion of historical information + Staff and user training & IT support
+ Modifications & system upgrades + Communication charges (internet access)
1.1.2 Information technology
- Internet
- Intranet: subset of internet, only authorised users can access
- Wireless technology
- Network technology
1.1.3 Principal controls
- Purpose: reports prepared only when benefits > costs, only sent to relevant managers
- Types: format agreed in advance & distribution lists
1.1.4 Confidential information
Information security - protects the interests of those relying on information from harm
resulting from hacking, operational error, sabotage and other threats
Security – protection of the system from harm
Privacy – restriction of knowledge to authorized persons
- General security controls
+ Training all staff to create: an appropriate attitude of mind & strong security culture
+ Staffing arrangements should include:
Authorization for access and change routines to programs
Segregation of duties
Thorough vetting of job applicants before being employed
Appropriate procedures for cleansing of security access for terminated staff
Risk analysis on sensitive staff
- Physical access controls: security guards and cameras; time controls; electronic door
locks (PIN, card or bio-data entry)
- Logical access controls: system passwords; usage logs
- Hacking: authorization attack & trapdoor/backdoor attacks
1.2 Sources of information
- Internal: accounting system, inventory, payroll, purchase processing, sales processing,
qualitative information (e.g, customer satisfaction)
- External: primary (tailored information) & secondary (data for general use)
1.3 Information systems and data analytics
1.3.1 Accounting information requirements
- Strategic: profits by business segment; external factors influencing the organization;
market studies; investment appraisal
- Tactical: + Contain forecasts over periods up to 12 months
+ More detailed: detailed SOPL analysing revenue & costs by division/product
+ Be mainly internal and provided regularly: monthly analysis of revenues compared
with budgets and variance analysis
- Operational: transaction-based data (e.g, variances; receivables/payable levels; payroll
details; customer complaints; output records)
1.3.2 Information systems
STRATEGIC Executive Information System - Assist senior-management
(EIS) - Allows users to customize their
view to focus on information most
relevant to them
TACTICAL Decision Support System (DSS) A computer-based information
system often utilising analytical
modelling techniques
Management Information System Obtain data => process to produce
(MIS) useful information => distribute to
relevant managers
OPERATIONA Transaction Processing System - High-frequent & short-term data
L (TPS) - Automated processing with
limited human input
- Approaches: (1) Batch
processing (e.g, payroll
transactions) (2) Real-time
systems processing
- Enterprize Resource Planning System (ERP): provides a seamless flow of information
across an entire organisation using a shared database
- Customer Relationship Management System (CRM)
1.3.3 Big data
Big data - vast data sets that may be analysed to reveal patterns, trends and associations,
especially relating to human behaviour and interactions
Structed data - data stored within defined fields within a defined record, along with
similar data, according to the specifications laid down in a data model. The data model
limits the data collected and how it can be processed
Unstructured data - information gathered in various forms and ways, not in accordance
with any data model, and thus may be difficult to store or analyse
- Data analytics: Data testing – Data mining – Predictive analytics – Text analytics –
Statistical analytics
- Characteristics: 5Vs
Variety non-uniform, from internal and external sources, some structured but
primarily unstructured
Velocity fast and continuous
Veracity is the data valid, and can its accuracy be relied upon?
Analysis
Advantages Disadvantages
(costs per unit are more accurate)
Better decision-making: more accurate ABC is still based on budgeted overheads
knowledge of cost and profit per unit evaluate in the current period unsuitable for
whether to stop producing loss-making products future strategic decisions
Where cost-plus pricing is used, applying ABC It is more complex, and the selection of
means that the price will be more likely to cost drivers may not be straightforward:
achieve the desired margins. - There may be more than one possible
Better understanding of what causes costs cost driver for a particular overhead, so
resulting from identifying the cost driver some judgment is required in selecting an
enables managers to make more informed appropriate driver
decisions on actions to reduce costs - As not all costs will be easily identified
Control of overheads is more straightforward, with particular cost pools, some allocations
as responsibility for incoming costs must be will be arbitrary
established before ABC can be implemented
More accurate performance measurement Additional time and cost will be incurred
leads to better performance management to set up and administer the system
CHAPTER 3: ADVANCES IN MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING
3.1. Developments in management accounting
Traditional management accounting: inward-looking, focusing on controlling costs
- Costing systems (marginal and absorption costing)
- Budgeting systems
- Standard costing and variance analysis
- Working capital management
Business environment changes
Growth of services industries: SHIP
- Simultaneity (inseparability): the service is consumed simultaneously as it is performed
- Heterogeneity (variability): standard
- Intangibility
- Perishability: cannot be stored
- Non-transferability of ownership
Adding value and avoiding waste
- Total Quality Management (TQM): getting it right the first time
- JIT Manufacturing: pull through philosophy – customer demand drives production
=> JIT purchasing: raw materials are received when needed for production, so raw
material inventory is reduced to near-zero levels (inventory holding costs are low, but
ordering costs are high)
Response of management accountants
3.2. Target costing: emphasizes cost control through good product design and
production planning
Aim and use
- Traditional cost-plus: cost + profit margin = price
- Price determined by the market => companies have to accept
- Target costing attempts to achieve an acceptable margin in a situation where the price of
a product is determined externally by the market. This margin is achieved by identifying
ways to reduce the product's costs.
Most appropriately used during the design phase of a product (where cost savings can be
identified by changing the design of the product to avoid unnecessary costs from being
designed into the product)
Steps
- Determine the price the market will accept
- Deduct a required profit margin from this price => target cost
- Estimate the actual cost of the product
- Identify ways to narrow the gap between the actual costs and the target costs
Application to service industries
- Target costing is likely most appropriate in manufacturing industries, where a volume of
standard products is to be made
Narrowing the target cost gap: ensure that the perceived value of the final product/service
is not reduced (which would lead to lower effective selling prices)
- Reconsider the design to eliminate non-value-added elements
- Reduce the number of components or standardise components
- Use less expensive materials
- Employ a lower grade of staff on production (if the production process does not require
specialist skills)
- Invest in new technology
- Outsource elements of the production or support activities
- Reduce manning levels or redesign the workflow
Tear down analysis (reverse engineering): examining a competitor’s product to
identify possible improvements/costs reduction
Value engineering: investigating factors that affect the cost of a product/service to
improve the design of a product so the same functions can be provided for a lower cost or
save cost by eliminating those the customer does not value => applied to new
product/service at the beginning of the development process during the design stage
(i.e. before production starts)
4 elements of value:
o Utility or use value: how useful the product is to the owner
o Esteem value: how the product increases the owner’s well-being
o Scarcity value: how rarity impacts value
o Exchange value: the amount the owner sells the product for
Functional analysis
3.3. Life-cycle costing
Product lifecycle
- Development stage (planning and design stage): negative cash flow, no revenue
- Introduction phase/launch: market skimming, market penetration
- Growth: competition rises => force lower prices
- Maturity: most profits are made, stable prices => focus on maximizing short-term profits
- Decline: prices fall, unless a niche market found
Costs involved
- Commited costs: not incurred during the design phase, the company is committed to
incurring future expenditures (mainly during manufacturing) (common: 80% total costs
over the product’s life)
- Cost behavior
Stage Fixed costs Variable costs
Planning and Product design
design Buidling prototypes
Market research
Manufacturing Marketing and advertising Materials and components
and sales Fixed production and sales Direct labour
overheads Variable production and non-production
Design updating overheads
Sales commissions
Service and Decommissioning factories Servicing (may be outsourced)
abandonmen Disposal of products
- Strategies to extend product maturity
o Issuing updated versions of the product, which include new features. The costs of
developing updates for an existing product are likely considerably less than the cost
of creating an entirely new product.
o Repackaging the product to give it a new image
o Selling the product in new markets. This could be new geographical markets or
aiming the product at new market segments (e.g. by discounting the price).
3.4. Throughput accounting: producing for sale, not work-in-progress
The theory of constraints: Processs to maximize profit when faced with bottlenecks
1. Identify the system’s bottlenecks
2. Decide how to exploit the bottlenecks identified in (1)
3. Subordinate everything else to the decisions made in (2): ensure that other resources
do not produce at a higher rate than the bottleneck
4. Elevate the system’s bottlenecks (i.e. elevate production capacity by buying additional
machines (capacity investment), training the machine operators or reducing the time
spent on the bottleneck resource)
5. If a new constraint is broken in (4), return to (1)
Throughput contribution = Sales revenue – Direct material costs
The fixed elements in this technique include overheads and labour, which may collectively
termed “conversion costs”
Throughput accounting ratio (TPAR) = Contribution per hour / Fixed cost per hour
Non-financial factors
4.4. Shut-down decisions
- If positive contribution is being generated after all attributable costs, division should not
be shut down.
- Allocated fixed costs from head office should not be included in shut-down decision.
4.5. Further processing decisions
- Joint products have significant relative sales value
- A by-product is produced with one/more main products but has a small relative sales
value
- Once the products have reached the split-off point:
+ It may be possible to sell the product immediately in its current state.
+ The product may require further processing before it can be sold if incremental
revenue > incremental costs
4.6. Make or buy
Outsourcing
Advantages:
- Lower cost
- Service may become variable cost rather than a fixed cost
- Outsourcing allows management to focus on the core competencies of the business
without being distracted by managing peripheral areas.
- A specialist supplier may be able to supply goods or services of higher quality.
- Access to a broader range of expertise as the provider deals with several clients.
Disadvantages
- Loses control over a part of its business processes due to a third party involved
- Trusting a third party with confidential information about goods or services.
- Some costs may not be apparent (i.e. hidden) as anything not explicitly covered by the
contract will incur additional charges.
- Quality may suffer, especially if the contract price per unit is fixed (i.e. the third party
can only increase its profit by reducing costs)
- Operational dependence on the outsourcing company is linked to its financial
stability. Switching to another provider may be costly if the third-party company fails.
- Demotivate the workforce if the decision to outsource is associated with job losses
Make vs. Buy decisions
- Financial decisions based on whether make or buy-in maximizes incremental
contribution
- If a scarce resource is present, maximize contribution per scarce resource.
- Non-financial factors may apply.
CHAPTER 5: COST VOLUME PROFIT ANALYSIS
5.1. CVP Analysis
Objective: Effects of sales volume on financial results
Breakeven point
- A measure of the LOWEST activity level
- TOTAL CONTRIBUTION = TOTAL FIXED COSTS
5.2. Charts
Breakeven chart
Profit-volume chart
Multi-product situations
- Product mix
- PV charts
Advantages:
o Multi-product PV charts enable the user to see easily the relationship between revenue
and profit. Breakeven revenue can also be seen.
o Identifying the most and least profitable products should lead to improved
decisionmaking.
Disadvantages:
o The PV chart assumes either a constant sales mix or assumes that products are sold in
order of increasing C/S ratio. The actual sales mix is likely to deviate from these
assumptions, making the conclusions about breakeven revenue incorrect.
o The chart shows only profits plotted against revenue. It does not show variable costs
or output in units.
o The chart assumes that products can be sold in order of profitability, which ignores the
possibility that sales of one product may depend on sales of another.
CHAPTER 6: LIMITING FACTOR DECISIONS
Limiting factor analysis: phân tích yếu tố giới hạn để tối đa hoá lợi nhuận góp
(Contribution = Sales – Variable costs)
Throughput accounting: phân tích nguồn lực giới hạn để tối đa hoá throughput
(Throughput = Sales – Material costs)
6.1. Limiting factors
Limiting factors analysis
- It is possible for production capacity < sales demand due to scarcity (i.e. labor, machine
time, factory space, etc)
- This scarce resource is known as the limiting factor
One limiting factor
- With no limiting factor, maximum production is market demand
- Decision would be to prioritize products that maximize contribution
- Approach: limiting factor => contribution per unit => contribution per unit of limiting
factor => rank
Shadow price (dual price): the maximum price premium (incremental contribution)
that should be paid to obtain one more unit of a scarce resource (limiting factor) – NOT THE
TOTAL PRICE PAID
Feasible region: With the given constraints, all possible values for x and y lie in the boxed
area of the graph 0ABCD, called the relevant or feasible region. The point on the boundary of
this area must now be found where the contribution (C) has a maximum value.
Step 5 – The objective function
Only one contribution line needs to be plotted to identify the optimal solution.
For example, 100x + 150y = 150,000
The highest possible value of C lies where an iso-contribution line is furthest from the origin
on the edge of the feasible region.
- Contribution lines with a higher contribution value are further from the origin (the
point x = 0, y = 0) than those with a lower value
- All iso–contribution lines are parallel to each other
Contribution and the feasible region
- The line representing the lowest contribution value is closest to the origin. The line
furthest from the origin is outside of the feasible region. This means that this level of
contribution could not be achieved.
- Most of the middle contribution line lies outside the feasible region, but point B is on the
boundary of the feasible region, representing the combination of production that is
feasible at which contribution is maximised. It is the last point within the boundary that is
passed by the contribution line before it leaves the boundary.
Slope of the contribution line
- Point B represents the maximum contribution point
- However, had the contribution line been “flatter”, point A could be the point of maximum
contribution
Required: Determine how many units of each type of furniture should be produced each
week to maximise contribution. Calculate the maximum weekly contribution
The feasible region on the graph is 0ABCD. The dashed line represents the objective function.
Considering the point on the x axis (i.e. y = 0), x = 20 i.e. C = 35x + 10y = 700 (Alternatively,
consider the point on the y axis (i.e. x = 0), y = 70, i.e. C = 35x + 10y = 700
The optimum point is at C, the intersection of the skilled and unskilled constraints.
Solving simultaneously: 5x + 2y = 140 (1)
4x + y = 100 (2)
2 x (2) 8x + 2y = 200 (3)
(3) – (1) 3x = 60
x = 20
By substitution in (2): 80 + y = 100
y = 20
So to maximize contribution, the company should make and sell 20 of each type of unit
Contribution = (20 x $35) + (20 x $10) = $900
Assumptions
- Linearity - contribution and resource utilisation per unit are the same for any quantity
produced and sold in the range under consideration
- Infinite divisibility - of products and resources.The solution may not have integer values
(e.g. 12 1/4 units of x and 9 3/4 units of y) and should not be rounded. For example, for
an optimisation problem:
o rounding up will be to a point outside the feasible region
o if rounding down, it will depend on the gradient of the objective function, which
integer value lies furthest from the origin
- Solution is dependent on the quality of the input data (complete, accurate and valid)
- Only one quantifiable objective can be satisfied. Non-quantifiable objectives are not
considered at all
- Single value estimates (e.g. expected values) can be used for uncertain variables
- Only two "products" for graphical solution
PED will generally be negative since a rise in price leads to a fall in demand. However, by
convention, the minus sign is ignored when describing PED (e.g. if calculated as "− 1.5", it is
described as "1.5").
Demand for a product can be described as:
- Elastic − meaning that demand is very responsive to changes in price
PED > 1.0, increasing the price may lead to reduced revenue
- Inelastic− meaning that a change in price will have little impact on demand
PED < 1.0, price rises can increase revenue (e.g. necessity goods)
Product lifecycle
- Introduction: price skimming or penetration pricing
- Growth: price skimming => price reduced, penetration pricing => price rise
- Maturity: profit maximization pricing policies
- Decline phase: lower prices may be charged to sell of excess inventories
Competitors
Customers
Perfect competition
CHAPTER 8: RISK AND UNCERTAINTY
8.1. Decision making in a world of risk
Risk: the existence of several possible outcomes, which are known in advance along with the
related probability
Methods:
- Expected value - Maximax
- Value of perfect information - Maximin
- Decision trees - Minimax regret
Uncertainty: the potential outcomes of a decision that are not known in advance
8.2. Expected value (EV): represents the average outcome that would be achieved if a
decision were repeated many times
EXPECTED = WEIGHTED ARITHMETIC MEAN OF POSSIBLE OUTCOMES
VALUE (EV) = Σ (xi p(xi))
The sum of the probabilities of all outcomes must equal to 1
Profit tables (payoff matrix)
Value of perfect information
VALUE OF PERFECT INFORMATION
= EV WITH PERFECT INFORMATION – EV WITHOUT PERFECT INFORMATION
Value of imperfect information
VALUE OF IMPERFECT INFORMATION
= EV WITH IMPERFECT INFORMATION – EV WITHOUT INFORMATION
Decision trees
- Decision fork (point)
- Positive and negative feedback: the output has achieved/exceeded/below the plan
- Feed-forward control: predicted future results are compared against the desired
outcome. If it appears that the desired result will not be achieved based on the current
prediction, action can be taken now so that it is achieved. (e.g. target costing: the
expected cost per unit is compared with the derised cost per unit, and action is taken
to eliminate the gap)
Advantages Disadvantages
Incremental • The system is relatively simple to operate • Gives no incentive for developing
budget and easy to understand new ways of working or
• Avoid conflict between departmental reduction of costs
managers since a consistent approach is • Manager may spend
adopted throughout the organization unnecessarily to use up their
• Coordination between budgets is easier to budgeted expenditure to receive
achieve, as increments in functional the same/higher budget in next
budgets are easily aggregated into master year
budgets • The budget may become out of
• The effect of change can be seen quickly date and no longer relate to the
level of activity or type of work
being carried out
• The priority for resources may
have changed
• Any budgetary slack and
inefficiencies in a previous
budget is not reviewed
ZBB • Forces budget setter to re-evaluate every • Time-consuming, require high
activity. Obsolete activities are removed. level of skills (cost > benefit)
Wastage and budget slack should be • Ranking the packages can be
eliminated. difficult since many activities
• Develops a questioning attitude and cannot be compared based purely
encourages managers to look for on quantitative measures
alternatives • Too rigid and organization may
• Encourages a bottom-up approach to not able to react to unforeseen
budgeting => boost motivation of opportunities or threats
employees • Short term benefit > detriments
• Prevents “budget creep” (based on previous of long term goal
year’s figures with a percentage add-on)
Rolling • The budget is continuously updated to • Time, effort and money
budget reflect external changes, making it more • Budgets may be changed to hide
relevant and valid for comparison against operational inefficiencies
actual performance
• There will always be a budget for the next
12 months. This can be useful for planning
things such as cash flows and controlling
• Managers will be more motivated as the
budget is more realistic because it will be
updated to take account of changes outside
of their control
ABB • Draws attention to the costs of ‘overhead • Complicated and expensive to
activities’ which can be a large proportion implement as it requires detailed
of total operating costs analysis of overheads and
• A better understanding of what causes costs measuring of activities
to be incurred may provide opportunities • As fixed costs do not vary with
for cost reductions. changes in the volume of drivers
• May identify “non-value adding” activities in the short run, ABB may
which can be eliminated provide misleading information
9.4. Information used in budgetary systems
Aspects of information quality
A C C U R A T E
Accurate Complete Cost- User- Relevant Authoritative Timeliness Easy to
effective focused use
Sources of data and information: internal, external
9.5. Difficulties of changing a budgetary system
- Resistance to change: employees who do not appreciate the value of change may be
reluctant to help, especially if it requires additional work.
- Scepticism: particularly at senior management levels. Managers who do not understand
the benefit of the change may not give their full support.
- Training everyone involved in the process of change.
- Additional time and costs involved in moving to a new system
9.6. Uncertainty in the environment
Forecasting
- Factors may cause uncertainty in the budget-setting process:
o overall economic performance of the markets
o actions of competitor
o performance of employees
o market prices of inputs
o demand for new products will be uncertain
- Methods:
o Flexed or flexible budgets
o Rolling budgets
o Revision of the budgets at the end of the period before comparing with actual results
Flexible budgets: involves preparing two or more budgets, using different assumptions for each
about the level of sales or production
TOTAL COST = FIXED COST + (VARIABLE COST x ACTIVITY LEVEL)
High-low method or Learning curve
Flexed budgets: At the end of the year, prior to comparing the actual figures against the budget,
the budgets are re-calculated (flexed) using the original budget assumptions, but the actual
activity levels
9.7. Behavioral aspects of budgeting
Hopwood’s management styles
- Budget-constrained style
- Profit-conscious style
- Non-accounting style: qualitati ve factors are more important (e.g. customer satisfaction)
The value of the correlation coefficient will always lie between −1 and 1
r = +1 perfect positive correlation (i.e. all points on an upward sloping straight line)
r = −1 perfect negative correlation (i.e. all points on a downward sloping straight line)
r=0 means the variables are uncorrelated (i.e. no linear relationship)
Coefficient of determination (r2): explains how much of the total change in the amount of one
variable can be explained by the change in the other variabe
Regression:
- Assumes a lineare relationship between variables
- Described by equation y = a + bx
10.4. Learning curve theory
The learning effect
- Starts from the production of the first unit/batch
- Each time cumulative production doubles, the cumulative average time per unit falls
to a fixed percentage of the previous average time
Tabulation
Example
A product will take 100 hours for the first unit, and an 80% learning curve applies.
Required: Complete the following table
Unit Cumulative average time Cumulative total time Incremental total time
s
1 100 100 100
2 80%*100 = 80 160 60
4 80%*80 = 64 256 96
8 80%*64 = 51.2 409.6 153.6
16 80%*51.2 = 40.96 655.36 245.76
y = axb
y – cumulative average time per unit to produce x units
a – time taken for the first unit of output
x – the cumulative number of units produced
b – the index of learning (logLR/log2)
LR – the learning rate as a decimal
Conditions for a learning curve to apply
- The activity is labor intensive
- The units are identical (i.e. a repetitive task)
- Low labor turnover
- No prolonged breaks in production
Applications of learning curve theory
- Standard setting – labor standard should be set/revised based on the expected learning
effect
- Budgeting – variable costs per unit are expected to fall with an increase in production
- Pricing decisions – an accurate labor cost may be predicted
- Work scheduling
Reservations about the learning curve
- Knowing what the learning rate will be for new products
- Useful when a product’s production occurs continuously. If there is a break in
production, workers may “forget” the skill and the learning curve will not be so
predictable.
- Many products are tailor-made for customers so the mass production on identical items,
on which the learning effect is based, is not always appropriate
- In some heavily unionized industries, there may be “go slow” agreements where
workers agree not to work to their full capacity to save jobs
Steady state
In practice, the learning curve effect does not continue forever. At some point, a “steady
state” is reached; beyond this point, the time taken per unit is constant
INCREMENTAL TIME PER UNIT (STEADY STATE)
= TOTAL TIME (ALL UNITS AT SS) – TOTAL TIME (ALL UNITS BEFORE SS)
Steady state is achieved when the incremental time per unit is constant
Even after steady state is reached, the cumulative average time per unit would
still be decreasing
Example
Drake Co is budgeting the labour hours it needs to produce its new product, the Rega.
Drake Co estimates that the learning rate of its workforce on this production is 85%, and that
steady state is reached on the 20th unit.
The index of learning b is given as −0.2345. The time taken to produce the first unit is 2 hours.
Required: Calculate the incremental labour time per unit for the 20th and subsequent
units.
Hours
Total time taken to make the first 20 units (20*2*20-0.2345) 19.81
Total time taken to make the first 19 units (19*2*19-0.2345) 19.05
Time taken to make the 20th and subsequent units 0.76
The 20th unit took 0.76 hours to produce. This would apply to all units produced after the 20th
unit. For example, if total production was 100 units, the total labor hours would be:
19.81 hours (total time to make 20 units) + 80*0.76 hours (steady state incremental time per
unit) = 80.61 hours
Estimate the learning rate
- Tabular approach
Example
Foxy Co makes personal computers. The components for the PCs are bought from various
manufacturers, and the factory workers at Foxy Co assemble these to make a finished PC.
Production of a new type of PC has just begun. The management accountant has asked a
worker to keep a record of how much time they took to make each new computer. The worker
provided the following summary for the first month:
Incremental time taken (minutes)
1st unit 340
2nd unit 204
3rd and 4th units 326
5th to 8th units 522
9th to 16th units 964
17th to 32nd units 1,928
Total 4,284
The time shown within each band is the total for that band, not the average per computer.
Required:
a. Calculate the learning rate that applied to the new PC
Cumulative output Cumulative total time Cumulative average time per unit
(units) (minutes) (minutes)
1 340 340
2 544 272
4 870 217.5
8 1,392 174
16 2,356 147.25
32 4,284 133.875
As cumulative output doubles:
From 1 to 2 units: 272/340 = 80%
From 2 to 4 units: 217.5/272 = 80%
Therefore, the learning rate appears to be 80%.
b. Estimate the point at which the learning period finishes
Incremental time taken Average incremental time
1st unit 340 340
2nd unit 204 204
3rd and 4th units 326 163
5th to 8th units 522 130.5
9th to 16th units 964 120.5
17th to 32nd units 1,928 120.5
The time taken per unit becomes constant at 120.5 from the start of the band that includes the
9th to the 16th unit.
Therefore, the learning effect ends after the 8th unit.
- Algebraic approach: MUST BE USED when only information about the cumulative
average time is for two levels of output that are not exponentials of 2
MIGHT BE CASE IN OTQ
Example
The first unit of a product took 300 minutes; the total time taken for the first 8 units was 2,056
minutes.
Therefore, the cumulative average time per unit for the first 8 units is 257 minutes (2,056/8).
Cumulative output has doubled three times since the production of the first unit (from 1 to 2,
to 4, then to 8), and the cumulative average time per unit has fallen to 257. If the learning rate
is r:
Then, 300 × r3 = 257
So, r3 = 257/300 = 0.8567
Therefore, r = 0.9497 i.e. approximately 95%
It is potentially confusing that a HIGHER LEARNING RATE means the EFFECT
of learning is LOWER
Several developments may have reduced the learning effect and led to a higher
learning rate
- The introduction of technology means that the processes are less labor intensive.
There is, therefore, less scope for learning, as much of the process is likely to be
automated anyway and automated processed are likely to work at a constant rate.
- The recent redundancies may have demotivated the remaining staff members, as
they may believe that the company has little loyalty towards them. When morale is
low, employees are less likely to work as productively as possible, leading to a
higher learning rate.
CHAPTER 11 + 12: STANDARD COSTING & BASIC VARIANCE
ANALYSIS
[F2 REVISION]
STANDARD COSTING
- Standard cost: is a planned or predetermined cost which indicates how much a unit of
a product or service SHOULD cost
- Standard costing: is a control technique because it involves comparing standard
(expected) costs with actual costs and calculate their differences
- Standard type: basic standard, ideal standard, attainable standard, current standard
APPLYING STANDARD
SALES VARIANCES
Actual quantity sold x Actual price (AQ AP) Price variance
(shows the effect on profit of selling at a
Actual quantity sold x Standard price (AQ SP)
higher/lower price than the standard)
CAUSES OF VARIANCE
Favorable Adverse
Materials price Bulk discounts Market price increase (shortage)
Different Bad purchasing
supplier/materials Delivery costs
Change in quality
Materials usage Better quality Defective material
Different batch sizes More efficient Theft
Change in mix Excessive waste or spoilage
Stricter quality control
Labor rate Lower skilled labor Wage rise
Different skill mix Overtime working
Bonus payment
Idle time Strikes
Lack of material
Breakdowns
Injury/illness
Lack of orders
Labor efficiency Positive motivation Negative motivation
Higher pay/skill Lower pay/skill
Better equipment Poor equipment/material
Learning effect Slow working
Better material
Overhead expenditure Cost savings/cutbacks Cost increases
Incorrect split of semi- Excessive service usage
variable and fixed costs
Overhead efficiency
Overhead capacity Increase in productive hours Excessive idle time
Shortage of plant capacity
Sales price Market shortage To achieve an increase in volume
Change in quality
Response to
competitors
Pass on cost changes
Sales volume Increase in market share/size Fall in market share/size
CHAPTER 13: ADVANCED VARIANCE ANALYSIS
13.1. Materials mix and yield variances
Material usage variance = Material mix variance + Material yield variance
A mix variance is used to monitor the cost of material by looking at the change in the cost of
materials when the input materials are used in different proportions to the set standard
Actual quantity, Actual quantity,
Difference Variance
actual mix (AQ AM) Standard mix
liters/kg liters/kg liters/kg $
A B (A – B) (A – B) x Standard cost
Material 1
Material 2
A yield variance measures the efficiency of turning the inputs into outputs
The ‘total’ method Units
Actual output (in units) A
Exptected outputs from actual input (in units) B
Difference (A – B)
x standard cost per unit
Yield variance x
The ‘individual’ method
AQ SM SQ SM Variance
liters/kg liters/kg liters/kg $
A B (B – A) (B – A) x Standard cost
Material 1
Material 2
Interpreting material mix and yield variances
- A favorable overall materials mix variance means the actual mix is cheaper than
standard mix. Cheaper materials have been substituted for more expensive ones.
- A favorable yield variance means that actual output exceeds the output expected
for the given input units. This could be due to:
o Less spillage due to production methods
o Less waste due to quality of materials used as inputs
Inter-relationship between price, mix and yield variances
- The materials price variances may be outside the control of the production manager
- A manager who creates a favourable mix variance using an increased proportion of less
expensive material may inadvertently cause an unfavourable yield variance
A favorable mix and yield variance may result in an unfavorable non-financial impact
13.2. Sales mix and quantity variances
- A sales mix variance: indicated the effect on profit of changing the mix of actual sales
from the standard mix
Produc Actual sales quantity, Actual sales quantity, Differen Standard Variance
t Actual mix (AQAM) Standard mix (AQSM) t margin
A B A-B C (A – B) x C
X
Y
Z
- Sales quantity variance: indicates the effect on profit of selling a different total quantity
from the budgeted total quantity
Produc Actual sales quantity, Budgeted sales quantity, Differen Standard Variance
t Standard mix (AQSM) Standard mix (BQ DM) t margin
A B A-B C (A – B) x C
X
Y
Z
Interpreting the sales mix and quantity variance
- Analyzing the sales volume variance into mix and quantity variances is only likely useful
when sales of the various products are interrelated
- The analysis may indicate that products are substitutes or complements
- An adverse mix variance means that customers are buying less of the higher-margin
products and are instead buying lower-margin products. It implies substitution of one
product for another, rather than a reduction in the overall quantity of products sold
- An adverse quantity variance may be due to poor economic conditions or a new
competitors
Inter-relationships between variances
o Sales price and sales volume variances: a fall in selling prices for products would lead
to an adverse price variance. However, if it also leads to higher demand for the
products, the volume variance would be favorable.
o Sales mix and quantity variances: an adverse sales mix variance may be due to
customers switching to cheaper ranges or brands as these may be considered better
value. If these “better value” products attract customers from other products too, this
will lead to a favorable quantity variance
CHAPTER 14: PLANNING AND OPERATIONAL VARIANCES
14.1. Revision of budgets and standards
- At the end of a budget period, before comparing an organization’s actual performance
against the budget, budgets may be revised to take account of environmental changes
that were not anticipated when the budget was prepared
- Principles
o If something occurred during the budget period that was outside the control of the
manager meant the budget became unrealistic, the original budget should be revised
o Management should NOT revise budgets to hide inefficiencies
o Senior management should approve only appropriate revisions
14.2. Planning and operational variances
Problems of traditional variance analysis
- Compares: ACTUAL PERFORMANCE vs. EXPECTED PERFORMANCE
- Operational variance: revised budget vs. actual results
- Planning variance (or budget revision variance): revised budget vs. original budget
Planning cost variances
Materials price and labor rate
- Traditional price/rate variance: (AQ AP) (AQ SP)
Planning price variance Operational price variance
Actual quantity x Original standard price x Actual quantity x Actual price x
Actual quantity x Revised standard price x Actual quantity x Revised standard price x
Planning price variance x Operational price variance x
Adverse if the revised standard price is Favorable if the actual price is less than the
higher than the original standard price revised standard price
Materials usage and labor efficiency
- Traditional usage/efficiency variance: (AQ used – BQ for actual production) x Std cost
Planning price variance Operational price variance
Original std quantity for actual output x Actual quantity used x
Revised std quantity for actual output x Revised std quantity for actual output x
Difference x Difference x
@ original std price/rate per unit/hour x @ original std price/rate per unit/hour x
Material usage/Labor efficiency x Material usage/Labor efficiency x
planning variance operational variance
Adverse if the revised std quantity is greater
than the original std quantity
Learning curve and labor variances
Market size and market share variances
- A market size variance: arises because the size of the market was different from
expected due to change in the external environment (e.g. economic growth)
- A market share variance: arises because the share of that market was different from the
budget (e.g. due to effective advertising)
Sales managers can control the market share variance but cannot control the market
volume variance. Therefore, any bonus for the sales manager should be linked to the
market share variance.
Innovation is also essential to SmartC as it invests in new technology and improves processes with its
smartphone app. Resource utilisation is critical to its financial success as efficient use of delivery
vehicles, staff and financial resources will reduce costs and improve profitability. In other words,
innovation and resource utilisation drive financial success (higher profits) and competitiveness
(maintaining market share).
Example
The government of Northland privatised the Northland Railway Company in 20X6. The company was
split into smaller companies, each operating the trains on a specific route. These companies were then
sold to the private sector.
One of the private companies formed was the Great Suburban Railway Company, which provides
passenger train services on a busy commuter route between the capital city of Bigton and Smallton, a
distance of 100 km.
Financial and other information relating to the Great Suburban Railway for three financial years are
presented below.
20X7 20X8 20X9
Revenue ($000) 30,000 32,000 35,000
Profit ($000) (1,000) 2,000 5,000
Number of passenger journeys (000) 2,000 1,900 1,900
Number of employees 500 450 400
% of trains arriving on time 70% 72% 75%
Other information
The Great Suburban Railway is the only company licensed to operate a rail route between Bigton and
Smallton.
The aims of privatising the trains were to stop the subsidy the government had previously paid to the
train company and to increase the punctuality of services.
Since privatisation, passengers have complained that the number of carriages on each train has been
reduced, leading to a shortage of seats during peak times.
Required: Discuss the performance of the Great Suburban Railway from the perspective of
a. A shareholder
Shareholders will be pleased with the performance since privatisation. Revenues have increased by
16.67% from 20X7 to 20X9, which is good for a business such as railways where demand is likely to
be limited. The increase appears due to higher ticket prices, as the number of passenger journeys
(volume) fell during the period.
While the company recorded a loss in 20X7, the first year after privatisation, it made a good profit in
20X8 and 20X9. Profits have risen by more than revenue in absolute terms. This shows that the
company has reduced costs at the same time that revenues have increased. Net profit margin rose from
6.25% in 20X8 to 14.2% in 20X9.
The company has performed well from the perspective of shareholders.
b. The government
Generally, The government will be pleased that it no longer has to subsidise the railway and that the
company appears to survive in the private sector.
Another objective of privatisation was to increase the punctuality of trains. The Great Suburban
Railway has improved punctuality, measured as the percentage of trains arriving on time, from 70% to
75% between 20X7 and 20X9, so some progress has been made. However, 25% of trains are still
late, and the government (and passengers) will not be pleased.
c. The population of Smallton
The main objective for the people of Smallton likely is to have a reliable train service to the capital
which charges reasonable prices.
Punctuality has already been discussed, and passengers would likely be happy with the increase in the
percentage of trains arriving on time. However, they would hope for further improvements in this area.
One area that customers are likely to be unhappy about is the apparent increase in ticket prices.
Dividing total revenue by number of passenger journeys, the average ticket per journey has risen from
$15 in 20X7 to $18.42 in 20X9, an increase of 22%. This is a significant increase and is not likely to be
popular unless accompanied by better service in some way.
Customers also complain about the reduced number of carriages, leaving people without seats during
peak times. So, it does not appear that passengers are experiencing better service.
The number of passengers has fallen by 5% between 20X7 and 20X9. This is likely to be due to the
increase in prices. People may find alternative ways to travel to the capital (such as by bus or car) or
reduce their journeys.
Overall, the people of Smallton are not likely to be happy with the performance of the privatised
company.
Market conditions and competitors
Sustainability: meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future
generations to meet their own needs
CHAPTER 17: DIVISIONAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
17.1. Decentralization: delegation of authority to make decisions
- Revenue centers: decisions about revenue generation (usually selling costs)
- Cost centers: costs
- Profit centers: costs and revenue
- Investment centers: cost, revenues and asset investment decisions
Benefit
- Senior management can concentrate on strategy
- Faster decision-making: divisional managers are “on the spot” and can react quickly to
changes
- Better decision-making: specialist managers will likely understand their part of the
business better than senior management
- Motivation: divisional managers are given responsibility and status and may increase
effort
- Training and career progression: divisional managers acquire skills and experience which
may prepare them for senior management (e.g. ‘rotated’ between divisions)
- Tax advantages: locating divisions in certain areas which enjoy tax incentives or
government grants
Problems
- Lack of goal congruence: the risk that divisional managers will make decisions
inconsistent with overall organizational objectives
- Increased information requirements: reporting systems must be introduced
- Lost economies of scale: costs may rise through duplication of common activities. A
central purchasing department may achieve better prices and lower overall overhead than
divisional purchasing departments
- Loss of central control: conflicts may occur if top management disagrees with the
decisions of divisional managers
Conditions for successful decentralization
- Business has several separate activities
- Divisions should be independent from each other
- Central policies to integrate and control (e.g. major capital expenditure, strategic
decisions and transfer prices)
- Carefully designed performance evaluation systems to reduce risk of dysfunctional
decisions
17.2. Divisional performance evaluation
Measurement characteristics
- A significant risk of decentralization: managers make decisions that are not in the best
interests of the overall company (dysfunctional decisions)
- A good performance measurement system
o Goal congruence: encourage decisions consistent with company objectives
o Timeliness: reporting fast enough to allow any required corrective action
o Controllability: evaluation only on performance under control
Possible measures
- Ratio analysis
Profitability Liquidity Other measures
Net profit margin Current ratio Contribution per key factor/
limited resource
Gross profit margin Quick ratio Sales per employee
Contribution margin Receivables collection period Industry-specific cost-related
Expenses as a Payables payment period ratios: transport cost per km;
percentage of sales Inventory holding period overheads per chargeable hour
- Non-financial measures
• Staff turnover • %Returns
• New customers gained • %Rejects/reworks (number of complaints
• Proportion of repeat booking received)
• Orders received • On-time deliveries
• Set-up times (customer waiting time) • Client contact hours
• New products developed • Training time per employee
- Measures by division
Division type Possible measure
Revenue Financial sales variances (volume, price, mix)
center selling cost ratio
Non-financial sales volume per employee
customer satisfaction rating
customer retention
Cost center Financial cost variances
costs per unit produced
Non-financial labor turnover
Profit center Financial controllable profit (if assessing manager)
traceable profit (if assessing division)
sales variances; profit margin; contribution margins
Non-financial customer returns
Investment Financial return on investment
center residual income
liquidity ratio: current ratio; receivables days
Non-financial number of new products developed
Controllable and traceable profit
- Controllable profit used to assess the manager’s performance
- Traceable profit used to assess the division’s performance
$ $
External sales x
Internal sales x
x
Variable costs x
Controllable by manager
Fixed costs x
(x)
Controllable divisional profit x
Divisional costs outside manager’s control (x)
Traceable divisional profit x
Allocated head-office costs (x)
Divisional net profit x
ROI & RI là 2 chỉ tiêu cơ bản để đánh giá hiệu quả hoạt động của các bộ
phận (division) được tổ chức theo hình thức các trung tâm đầu tư (investment
center)
17.3. Return on investment (ROI): a return on capital employed which compares
income with the operational assets used to generate that income
Profit is BEFORE INTEREST AND TAX/AFTER DEPRECIATION because
interest is affected by financing decisions, and tax is an appropriation
For manager For division
Controllable profit Traceable profit
ROI = x 100 ROI = x 100
Capital employed Capital employed
Decision rule – divisional performance is favorable if ROI is greater than the cost
of capital
Components of capital
- ROI is the divisional version of company ROCE (advise shareholders to buy or sell the
company’s shares)
- It is a measure of divisional performance, NOT an investment appraisal method
- If divisional managers choose projects with high ROI, the division’s ROI should be high.
The head office will favorably assess the manager
- But an ROI hurdle should not be the sole measure of a division’s purpose, as it may lead
to dysfunctional decisions
Advantages
- As a relative measure, it is easy to compare divisions.
- Similar to ROCE used externally by analysts.
- Focuses attention on scarce capital resources.
- Encourages reduction in non-essential investment by: selling off unused non-current
assets; and minimising the investment in working capital.
- Easily understood percentages (especially by non-financial managers)
- Can be further analysed (i.e. between profit margin and asset turnover)
Disadvantages
- Risk of dysfunctional decision-making
- The definition of capital employed is subjective
- If net book value is used, ROI will increase over time because of depreciation.
- Risk of window-dressing; boosting reported ROI by: under-investing; and cutting
discretionary costs (especially if ROI is linked to bonus systems).
17.4. Residual income: pre-tax profit less imputed interest charge for capital invested
For manager For division
Controllable profit x Traceable profit x
Imputed interest charge (x) Imputed interest charge (x)
Residual income x Residual income x
- Imputed interest: notional interest charge on the division by the head office
IMPUTED INTEREST = CAPITAL EMPLOYED x INTEREST RATE
Decision rule – accept a project/investment if RI is positive
Advantages
- RI overcomes some of the problems associated with ROI (dysfunctional behavior and
holding on to old assets)
- It can be linked to NPV, which, theoretically, is the best way to make investment
decisions. The PV of an investment's residual income equals the investment's NPV. In the
long run, companies that maximise RI will also maximise NPV and, in turn, shareholder
wealth
- A risk-adjusted cost of capital can reflect different risk positions of different divisions
Disadvantages
- Definition of capital employed
- Effect of depreciation
- Window dressing
- It is challenging to compare divisions of different sizes. The manager of the larger
division will generally show a higher residual income because of the size of the division
rather than superior managerial performance
- Less easily understood than a percentage
CHAPTER 18: TRANSFER PRICING
18.1. Transfer pricing: the price at which one division transfers goods or services to another
division within a company or from one subsidiary to another within a group
When needed
- An organization has been decentralized into divisions
- Inter-division trading of goods or services occurs
Objectives
- Goal congruence: encourage divisions with each other to trade in a way that maximize
profits for the company
- Division autonomy: divisional managers should be free to make their own decisions and
autonomy should improve their motivation
- Divisional performance evaluation: should be ‘fair’ and allow an objective assessment
If there is a conflict between two objectives of a transfer pricing system, goal congruence
must take priority
18.2. Opportunity cost approach
Supplying division pespective: accept a MINIMUM transfer price
= MARGINAL (VARIABLE COST) + OPPORTUNITY COST
- Scenario 1: Opportunity cost is zero (internal transfers do not reduce contribution from
external sales)
No external market or and No production constraints
External market but spare capacity
- Scenario 2: Opportunity cost arises (an internal sale sacrifices an external sale)
An external market exists, and
The supplying division operates at full capacity
Buying division perspective: MAXIMUM transfer price acceptable will be the lower of
- The external market price (if an external market exists); or
- The net revenue of the buying division
Economic transfer price rule
Minimum (per selling division) transfer price ≥ Marginal cost of selling division
and
Maximum (per buying division) transfer price ≤ The lower of
• External market price (if an external market exists); and
• Net marginal revenue of buying division
18.3. Practical approach
Market price method
- If buying and selling divisions can buy/sell externally at market price
- Need to be adjusted downwards if internal sales incur lower costs than external sales
(e.g. due to lower delivery costs)
Advantages Disadvantages
Optimal for goal congruence if the selling division Only possible if a perfectly competitive external
is at full capacity market exists
Encourage efficiency: the supplying division must Market prices may fluctuate
compete with external competition
Full cost plus
- The supplying division charges full absorption cost pluss a mark-up
- Standard costs should be used rather than actual costs to avoid selling divisions
transferring inefficiencies to buying divisions
Easy to calculate if standard costing system exists The fixed costs of them selling division become
Covers all costs of the selling division the variable costs of the buying division – may
May approximate to market price lead to dysfunctional decisions
If the selling division has spare capacity, it may
lead to dysfunctional decisions
The markup is arbitrary
Variable cost plus is similar to full cost plus
Marginal cost = Variable cost + Any incremental fixed costs (e.g. stepped costs)
Optimal for goal congruence when: selling division It may be dificult to calculate (variable cost is
has spare capacity; or no external market exists often used as an approximation)
Any transfer price other than the variable cost of the transferring division has the risk of
dysfunctional decision-making unless an upper limit equal to the net (marginal) revenue
in the receiving division is also imposed
18.4. Dual pricing: is sometimes used in situations where no transfer price would be
acceptable to both the buying and selling division
- A higher price is used when calculating the revenue of the selling division for goods
supplied to the buying division
- A lower price is used when calculating the costs in the buying division for the goods
supplied to it by the selling division
- The head office absorbs the difference between the two as a head office overhead
KIẾN THỨC CƠ BẢN
Transfer price: áp dụng cho các giao dịch mua bán nội bộ giữa các bộ phận trong công ty/tổ
chức
3 vấn đề khi xây dựng “Transfer price”
- Divisional autonomy: các bộ phận ra quyết định để tối ưu lợi ích chính họ thay vì công
ty
- Corporate profit maximization: các bộ phận tranh cãi về mức sản lượng đầu ra phù hợp
nên lợi nhuận của toàn công ty sẽ không được tối ưu
- Divisional performance: mức giá chuyển nhượng ảnh hưởng đến hành vi và quyết định
của các bộ phận
Mức giá chuyển nhượng lý tưởng phải bảo đảm
- Bộ phận bán kiếm lợi nhuận bù đắp cho công sức của họ. Bộ phận mua chỉ phát sinh chi
phí tương ứng lợi ích mà họ nhận được
- Khuyến khích bộ phận thực hiện chuyển nhượng và tối đa hoá lợi nhuận tổng thể công ty
- Xây dựng ở mức “hợp lí” đảm bảo kết quả hoạt động các bộ phận được đánh giá “hợp lí”
Nguyên tắc
Mức giá tối thiểu (Minimum price) = Chi phí cận biên (Marginal cost) của bộ phận bán +
Chi phí cơ hội bộ phận bán mất khi chuyển nhượng hàng hoá nội bộ
Mức giá tối đa (Maximum price) = Giá thị trường (Market price) thấp nhất mà bộ phận
mua có thể mua từ nhà cung cấp khác – Chi phí nội bộ tiết kiệm được trong đóng gói, vận
chuyển
VD: Công ty có 2 bộ phận A và B
- A sản xuất sản phẩm với chi phí cận biên là $100/unit và A có thể bán sản phẩm cho
khách hàng bên ngoài, thu về lợi nhuận gộp (contribution) là $20
- B có thể mua sản phẩm này từ nhà cung cấp khác với giá $160/unit
Mininum price = 100 + 20 = $120; Maximum price = $160
TH bộ phận bán có công suất dư thừa, có thể vừa bán cho nội bộ, vừa sản xuất bán cho
bên ngoài thì KHÔNG PHÁT SINH CHI PHÍ CƠ HỘI khi bán nội bộ
Cách xây dựng chính sách Giá chuyển nhượng tối ưu (Optimal transfer price)
- Mức giá chuyển nhượng lý tưởng nên phản ánh chi phí cơ hội giao dịch của các bộ phận
- Khi tồn tại thị trường hoàn hảo (perfect market) & chi phí biến đổi, giá bán là không đổi:
Chi phí cơ hội của việc chuyển nhượng = Giá thị trường – Chi phí tiết kiệm được (nếu
có)
- Khi không có thị trường cho sản phẩm nhưng chi phí biến đổi, giá bán là không đối: Giá
chuyển nhượng = Standard variable cost + chi phí cơ hội của việc chuyển nhượng
- Khi đơn giá bán và chi phí biến đổi thay đổi: mức giá chuyển nhượng lý tưởng chỉ có thể
xác định qua thương lượng và phân tích của các bộ phận
CƠ SỞ XÂY DỰNG
Xây dựng giá chuyển nhượng dựa trên giá thị trường “Market price”
- Áp dựng khi sản phẩm có thể được mua từ các nhà cung cấp bên ngoài khác
- Ưu điểm
o Lợi ích tốt nhất cho toàn bộ công ty: 2 bộ phận hưởng lợi vi chi phí quản lý, bán hàng
và vận chuyển rẻ hơn; bộ phận mua hưởng chất lượng tốt hơn, linh hoạt về thời gian
o Các bộ phận được tự do thương lượng, mặc cả => đảm bảo lợi ích tốt nhất
o Khi 1 cơ sở giá khác được áp dụng: luôn tranh cãi về sự hợp lí của giá chuyển
nhượng
- Nhược điểm
o Market price chỉ là tạm thời, ảnh hưởng bởi biến động thị trường
o Có thể khiến các nhà quản lý không muốn tận dụng công suất dư thừa (spare
capacity)
o Nhiều sản phẩm sẽ không có giá thị trường, phải sử dụng giá sản phẩm tương tự
o TH thị trường imperfect với sản phẩm (yêu cầu sản phẩm có giới hạn, cạnh tranh
không lành mạnh): bộ phận bán sẽ phải giảm giá bán khi cố gắng bán càng nhiều
càng tốt
Xây dựng giá chuyển nhượng dựa trên chi phí sản xuất
- Là cơ sở thường được sử dụng trong thực tế
- Giá chuyển nhượng có thể xác định theo tổng chi phí sản xuất hoặc chi phí biến đổi
- Full cost – nhược điểm: bên bán sẽ không có lợi nhuận nên không có động lực để thực
hiện giao dịch nội bộ và chi phí cố định cũng có nhiều cách phân bổ vào giá thành sản
phẩm => Thông thường DN sẽ cộng thêm 1 tỷ lệ lợi nhuận vào full cost
- Variable cost: bộ phận bán không đủ doanh thu để bù đắp chi phí cổ định
CASE STUDY
The Portable Garage Co (PGC) is a company specialising in the manufacture and sale of a range
of products for motorists. It is split into two divisions: the battery division (Division B) and the
adaptor division (Division A). Division B sells one product – portable battery chargers for
motorists which can be attached to a car’s own battery and used to start up the engine when the
car’s own battery fails. Division A sells adaptors which are used by customers to charge mobile
devices and laptops by attaching them to the car’s internal power source.
Recently, Division B has upgraded its portable battery so it can also be used to rapidly charge
mobile devices and laptops. The mobile device or laptop must be attached to the battery using a
special adaptor which is supplied to the customer with the battery. Division B currently buys the
adaptors from Division A, which also sells them externally to other companies.
The following data is available for both divisions:
Division B Division A
Selling price for each portable battery, Selling price per adaptor to Division B $13
including adaptor $180 Selling price per adaptor to external customers
$15
Costs per battery: Costs per adaptor:
Adaptor from Division A $13 Materials $3
Other materials from external suppliers Labour costs $4
$45 Labour costs $35
Annual fixed overheads $5,460,000 Annual fixed overheads $2,200,000
Annual production and sales of portable Current annual production capacity and sales of
batteries (units) 150,000 adaptors – both internal and external sales (units)
350,000
Maximum annual market demand for Maximum annual external demand for adaptors
portable batteries (units) 180,000 (units) 200,000
In addition to the materials and labour costs above, Division A incurs a variable cost of $1 per
adaptor for all adaptors it sells externally.
Currently, Head Office’s purchasing policy only allows Division B to purchase the adaptors from
Division A but Division A has refused to sell Division B any more than the current level of
adaptors it supplies to it.
The manager of Division B is unhappy. He has a special industry contact who he could buy the
adaptors from at exactly the same price charged by Division A if he were given the autonomy to
purchase from outside the group.
After discussions with both of the divisional managers and to ensure that the managers are not
demotivated, Head Office has now agreed to change the purchasing policy to allow Division B to
buy externally, provided that it optimises the profits of the group as a whole.
(a) Under the current transfer pricing system, prepare a profit statement showing the profit for
each of the divisions and for The Portable Garage Co (PGC) as a whole. Your sales and costs
figures should be split into external sales and inter-divisional transfers, where appropriate
Lập báo cáo lãi lỗ từng bộ phận và toàn công ty theo chính sách giá cũ
Items Division B ($’000) Division A ($’000) PGC Co ($’000)
Sales revenue:
External sales $180 x 150,000 = 27,000 $15 x 200,000 = 3,000 30,000
Internal transferred sales $13 x 150,000 = 1,950
Total revenue 27,000 4,950 30,000
Variable costs:
External material costs $45 x 150,000 = 6,750 $3 x 350,000 = 1,050 7,800
Internal transferred costs $13 x 150,000 = 1,950
Labor costs $35 x 150,000 = 5,250 $4 x 350,000 = 1,400 6,650
Other costs of external $1 x 200,000 = 200 200
sales
Total variable costs 13,950 2,650 14,650
Contribution 13,050 2,300 15,350
Less fixed costs 5,460 2,200 7,660
Profit 7,590 100 7,690
(b) Assuming that the new group purchasing policy will ensure the optimisation of group profits,
calculate and discuss the number of adaptors which Division B should buy from Division A and
the number of adaptors which Division A should sell to external customers.
Xác định sản lượng Division A nên bán nội bộ và bán ra bên ngoài theo chính sách giá mới
Nhìn nhận các giao dịch từ góc độ tập đoàn chứ không phải từng bộ phận
- Giá bán thiết bị chuyển đổi của Division A ra bên ngoài là $15/unit
- Mỗi sản phẩm Division A bán ra bên ngoài sẽ mang lại cho tập đoàn lợi nhuận góp
(contribution) là: $15 - $3 - $4 - $1 = $7/unit
- Chi phí cần thiết tăng thêm cho tập đoàn khi Division B mua từ bên ngoài $13 – ($3 +
$4) = $6/unit
- Như vậy bù trừ đi thì mỗi sản phẩm Division A bán ra bên ngoài vẫn sẽ mang lại cho tập
đoàn $1 lợi nhuận. Do đó, từ góc độ tập đoàn, A nên bán tối đa ra bên ngoài. Còn lại thì
bán cho B với mức giá chuyển nhượng do 2 bên thoả thuận
Sản lượng Division A bán ra bên ngoài: 200,000
Sản lượng Division A cung cấp cho Division B: 150,000
Sản lượng Division B phải mua từ nhà cung cấp bên ngoài: 30,000
Assume now that no external supplier exists for the adaptors which Division B uses.
(c) Calculate and discuss what the minimum transfer price per unit would be for any additional
adaptors supplied above the current level by Division A to Division B so that Division B can
meet its maximum annual demand for the new portable batteries.
Khi Division A bán cho Division B 180,000 sản phẩm nghĩa là Division A phải giảm thiểu doanh
số bán ra bên ngoài từ 200,000 xuống 170,000 sản phẩm. Do đó, đây là TH chuyển nhượng khi
không có công suất dư thừa nên giá chuyển nhượng tối thiểu trong TH này phải bảo gồm cả
chi phí cơ hội của việc chuyển nhượng. Cụ thể:
Mức giá tối thiểu (minimum price) = Chi phí cận biên (marginal cost) của bộ phận bán +
Chi phí cơ hội bộ phận bán bị mất khi chuyển nhượng hàng hoá nội bộ
Trong đó
- Chi phí cận biên của Division A khi chuyển nhượng nội bộ: $4 + $3 = $7
- Chi phí cơ hội Division A mất đi khi chuyển nhượng nội bộ: $7
- Giá chuyển nhượng tối thiểu: $14/unit
September/December 2021
The country of Jayland has two airlines, Flag Co, its national airline, and Budget Co, a recent entrant
into the market
Flag Co was government owned until ten years ago but is now operated as a private company. Its
mission is ‘to be the airline of choice for long distance travelers’. It charges premium fares and
operates routes from Jayland’s capital city to the major airports serving the largest cities around the
world. Many of its flights have durations greater than 12 hours. The majority of its passengers are
travelling on business and are prepared to pay high prices, however the demand for business travel is
very sensitive to economic conditions. Its fleet of aircrafts is regarded as ‘ageing’ by industry analysis.
Budget Co was founded by a wealthy entrepreneur who invested their personal fortune in the
company’s equity. Its mission is ‘to be the lowest fare airline on any route we serve’. If offers flights to
desinations up to three hours travel from Jayland. Its fleet of aircraft are generally less than two years
old. Most of its passengers are holiday-makers and the demand for its flights appears to be relatively
insensitive to economic conditions
The following information is available for both companies:
Statement of profit or loss extract for year end Flag Co Budget Co
31 Dec 20X6 $m $m
Total revenue 11,333 6,654
Operating profit 1,239 404
Finance costs 250 50
Other non-operating costs 130 76
Profit before tax 859 278
The better fuel economy is probably related to Budget Co’s newer fleet of aircraft. Better fuel
economy would tend to improve Budget Co’s operating margin, however, it is still lower than
Flag Co’s.
Liquidity
Flag Co Budget Co
Current ratio 0.6 0.79
= Current assets/Current liabilities 3,404/5,700 885/1,116
The current ratios of the two businesses are below the text book norm of 2:1, however, they
are both service companies which carry little inventory, so this is not surprising or worrying.
There is no apparent reason for the difference between the two companies.
Risk
Flag Co Budget Co
Capital employed 110.44% 51.47%
= Debt/equity 5,078/4,598 x 100 1,001/1,945 x 100
Interest cover 4.96 times 8.08 times
= PBIT/Interest (859+130+250)/250 (278+76+50)/50
Operating gearing 950% 820%
=
Flag Co has a relatively high level of long-term borrowings. This adds to the risks of the
business as interest on these borrowings has to be paid no matter the company’s operating
profit. At present, its operating profit is nearly five times larger than its interest bill and it
appears to be able to comfortably pay its commitments. Its operating gearing is 950%,
indicating that if sales volume fell by 10%, then its profit before interest and tax would fall by
95% (that is 950% or 9.5 times more). This would cause Flag Co difficulty in covering its
interest payments. As demand for business travel is very sensitive to economic conditions,
there is a strong probability that at some point Flag Co will experience a fall in sales volume.
As a result of its owner’s equity investment, Budget Co carries less financial gearing than Flag
Co and has better interest cover. Its operating gearing is slightly lower and given its relative
insensitivity to economic conditions, it can be considered a safer company than Flag Co.
(b) Briefly explain how Fitzgerald and Moon’s building block model could be used to manage the
performance of a service business
Fitzgerald and Moon’s building block model provides a framework for service companies to
design performance measurement systems which are linked to management rewards. It
provides a system of targets (standards) which will motivate managers to improve business
performance.
There are three building blocks in the model.
The first block gives six dimensions, meaning the aspects of performance which must be
measured in a service business. These are:
- Financial performance, for example, profitability and growth
- Competitiveness which measures an organisation’s standing against its competition
- Quality of the service offered
- Flexibility of the organisation in providing the service
- Innovation which addresses the ability to introduce new processes and services
- Resource utilisation which measures productivity and efficiency
These six dimensions should be split into results (financial performance and competitiveness)
which are the outcomes of past decisions and determinants (quality, flexibility, innovation and
resource utilisation) which drive future performance and results.
The second block relates to setting standards. To motivate managers, it is important that they
take ownership of standards (that is accept or internalise them) and the standards appear
achievable and equitable (fair).
The third block relates to the rewards managers are offered for achieving the standards. These
must have clarity (the performance measurement scheme must be understood by managers),
they must be motivating (rewards must be attractive) and controllable (not subject to
influences outside the manager’s control).
Required:
a. Assess the financial performance of the business during its first two quarters using only
the data in Table 1 above
Sales growth
Ties Only has had an excellent start to their business. From a standing start they have made
$420,000 of sales and then grown that figure by over 61% to $680,000 in the following quarter.
This is impressive particularly given that the clothing industry is very competitive. Equally it is
often the case that new businesses make slow starts, this does not look to be the case here.
Gross profit
The gross profit for the business is 52% for quarter 1 and 50% for quarter 2. Comparable
industry data is not provided so firm conclusions cannot be drawn. However, gross profit has
reduced by 2% in just one quarter. This is potentially serious and should not be allowed to
continue.
The cause of this fall is unclear, price pressure from competitors is possible, who may be
responding to the good start made by the business. If Ties Only were reducing its prices, this
would reflect on the gross profit margin produced.
It could also be that the supply side cost figures are rising disproportionately. As the business has
grown so quickly, it may have had to resort to sourcing extra new supplies at short notice
incurring higher purchase or shipping costs. These could all reduce gross margins achieved.
Website development
Website costs are being written off as incurred to the management accounting statement of profit
or loss. They should be seen as an investment in the future and unlikely to continue in the long
term. Website development has been made with the future in mind; future website costs may be
expected to be lower than at present. Taking this into consideration the loss made by the business
does not look as serious as it first appears.
Administration costs
These are 23.9% of sales in quarter 1 and only 22.1% of sales in quarter 2. This could be good
cost control, impressive given the youth and inexperience of the management team.
Also any fixed costs included in the cost (directors’ salaries are included) will be spread over
greater volume. This would also reduce the percentage of cost against sales figure. This is an
example of a business gaining critical mass. The bigger it gets the more it is able to absorb costs.
Ties Only may have some way to go in this regard, gaining a much greater size than at present.
Distribution costs
This is a relatively minor cost that again appears under control. Distribution costs are likely to be
mainly variable (postage) and indeed the proportion of this cost to sales is constant at 4.9%.
Launch marketing
Launch marketing is another cost that, although included in this statement of profit or loss, it is
unlikely to continue at this level. Once the “launch” is complete this cost will be replaced by
more general marketing of the website. Launch marketing will be more expensive than general
marketing and so the profits of the business will improve over time. This is another good sign
that the results of the first two quarters are not as bad as they seem.
Other costs
Another cost that appears under control in that it seems to have simply varied with volume.
b. Briefly consider whether the losses made by the business in the first two quarters are a
true reflection of the current and likely future performance of the business
Although the business has lost over $188,000 in the first two quarters of its life, this is not as
disastrous as it looks. The reasons for this view are:
- New businesses rarely breakeven within six months of launch;
- The profits are after charging the whole of the website development costs, these costs
will not be incurred in the future;
- Launch marketing is also deducted from the profits. This cost will not continue at such a
high level in the future.
The major threat concerns the fall in gross profit percentage that should be investigated.
The owners should be relatively pleased with the start that they have made. They are moving in
the right direction and without website development and launch marketing they made a profit of
$47,137 in quarter 1 and $75,360 in quarter 2.
If sales continue to grow at the rate seen so far, the business (given its ability to control costs) is
well placed to return significant profits in the future.
The current profit (or loss) of a business does not always indicate a business’s future
performance.
c. The owners are well aware of the importance of non-financial indicators of success and
therefore have identified a small number of measures to focus on. These are measured monthly
and then combined to produce a quarterly management report.
The data for the first two quarters management reports is shown below:
Table 2
Quarter 1 Quarter 2
System downtime 2% 4%
Notes:
A website hit is automatically counted each time a visitor to the website opens the home page of
Ties Only Co.
The industry average conversion rate for website hits to number of ties sold is 3.2%.
The industry average sales return rate for internet-based clothing sales is 13%
Comment on each of the non-financial data in Table 2 above taking into account, where
appropriate, the industry averages provided, providing your assessment of the
performance of the business
Website hits
This is a very impressive start. A new business can often find it difficult to make an impression
in the market. Growth in hits is 25% between the two quarters. If this continued over a year the
final quarter hits would be over 1.3m hits. The Internet enables new businesses to impact the
market quickly.
Number of ties sold
The conversion rates are 4% for quarter 1 and 4.5% for quarter 2. Both these figures may seem
low but are ahead of the industry average data. (Industry acquired data must be carefully applied,
although in this case the data seems consistent.) It appears that the business has a product that the
market is interested in. Ties Only is indeed looking competitive.
Average price achieved for the ties:
Quarter 1: $420,000/27,631 = $15.20 per tie
Quarter 2: $680,000/38,857 = $17.50 per tie
This suggests that the fall in gross profit has little to do with the sales price for the ties. The
problem of the falling gross profit must lie elsewhere.
On time delivery
Clearly the business is beginning to struggle with delivery. As it expands, its systems and
resources will become stretched. Customers’ expectations will be governed by the terms on the
website, but if expectations are not met then customers may not return. More attention will have
to be placed on the delivery problem.
Sales returns
Returns are clearly common in this industry. Presumably, ties have to be seen and indeed worn
before customers accept them as suitable. The concern here is that the business’s return rate has
jumped up in quarter 2 and is now well above the average for the industry. In other words,
performance is worsening and below that of the competitors. If the business is under pressure on
delivery (as shown by the lateness of delivery) it could be that errors are being made. If wrong
goods are sent out then disappointed customers will return them.
The alternative view is that the quality of the product is not what is suggested by the website. If
the quality is poor then unhappy customers could well return the products.
This is clearly concerning and an investigation is needed.
System down time
System down time is to be avoided by Internet based sellers as much as possible. If the system is
down then customers cannot access the site. This could easily lead to lost sales at that time and
cause customers not to try again at later dates. Downtime could be caused by insufficient
investment at the development stage or the site being is under pressure due to peaking volumes.
This second explanation is more likely in this case (as money was invested to build the server to
a high specification).
The down time percentage has risen alarmingly and this is concerning. Figures for the average
percentage down time achieved by comparable systems are needed to be able to comment
further.
The owners are likely to be disappointed given the level of initial investment they have already
made. A discussion with the website developers may well be warranted.
Summary: This new business is doing well. It is growing rapidly and ignoring non-recurring
costs is profitable. It needs to focus on delivery accuracy, speed and quality of product. It also
needs to focus on a remedy for the falling gross profit margin.
CHAPTER 18: TRANSFER PRICING
Bath Co
Bath Co specialises in the manufacture and sale of baths. Each bath consists of a main unit plus a
set of bath fittings. The company is split into two divisions, A and B. Division A manufactures
the bath and Division B manufactures sets of bath fittings. Currently, all of Division A’s sales are
made externally. Division B, however, sells to Division A as well as to external customers. Both
of the divisions are profit centres. The following data is available for both divisions:
Division A
Division B
Materials $5
(b) Head Office is considering changing the transfer pricing policy to ensure maximisation of
company profits without demotivating either of the divisional managers. Division A will be
given autonomy to buy from external suppliers and Division B to supply external customers in
priority to supplying to Division A => B sản xuất hết external 180,000 units, còn lại 20,000 units
internal transfer. A nhận 20,000 units và buy externally 60,000 unit (thêm $65 variable cost per
unit)
Calculate the maximum profit could be earned by Bath Co if transfer pricing is optimised
Division A Division B Bath Co
Revenue:
External 36,000 (80,000 x $450) 14,400 (180,000 x $80) 50,400
Inter-divisional transfer 1,300 (20,000 x $75)
Total 36,000 15,700 50,400
Variable costs
External material costs 19,900 ($265 x 60,000 + 1,000 ($5 x 200,000) 20,900
$200 x 20,000)
Inter-divisional transfer 1,300
Labor cost 3,600 3,000 6,600
Total (24,800) (4,000) (27,500)
Fixed cost (7,440) (4,400) (11,840)
Profit 3,760 7,300 11,060
(c) Discuss the issues of encouraging divisional managers to take decisions in the interests
of the company as a whole, where transfer pricing is used. Provide a reasoned
recommendation of a policy Bath Co should adopt
- Divisional performance: metric decided by the company
- Simply be the profit for the period or depending on type of responsibility center
- Whatever metric, profit figure => keen to maximize their individual profits => not aware
of the decisions’ impact on the company as a whole
Transfer pricing system take into account behavioral impact of the price charged
Divisional managers’ performance is assessed using a metric as decided by the company. This
may simply be the profit for the period, or, depending on the type of responsibility centre being
used, a metric such as residual income or return on capital employed. Whatever the metric being
used, the division’s profit figure is going to affect it and divisional managers are therefore going
to be keen to maximise their individual profits. By focusing on individual decisions, divisional
managers are often not aware of the impact of their decisions on the company as a whole. This
would particularly be the case where a decision which is in the best interests of the company
actually makes an individual division’s performance look worse.
The transfer pricing system in place needs to take into account the behavioural impact of the
prices being charged.
- Minimum transfer price B (spare capacity) = marginal cost of $20 per unit
- HOWEVER, B becomes worse off than before and the manager not like it meanwhile A
will not want to pay more than $65 that it can buy from outside the group
- Policy
Ensure: (1) A prepared to buy 20,000 sets from B
(2) B prepared to sell them at $65 per set để B work at full capacity & B biết A
có thể obtain for $65 => not difficult for B to agree
Also require divisions buy internally first to ensure (1) happens. Therefore, Bath’s
overall profit is maximized while ensuring that divisional manager do not be come
demotivated.
It can be seen from (b) that the best decision for Bath is that:
Division A buys 60,000 sets of fittings from an outside supplier and buys the remaining 20,000
sets of fittings from Division B in order to ensure that Division B is working to full capacity.
Division B sells as many fittings as possible externally, at $80 per set. Since the maximum
external demand is 180,000 units, Division B sells the remaining 20,000 sets to Division A. The
minimum transfer price that would be acceptable to Division B is its marginal cost of $20 per
unit, since it has spare capacity. However, using this transfer price, Division B becomes worse
off than before the autonomy was given and Division B’s manager will not like this. Division A
will not want to pay more than the $65 that it can buy from outside the group.
Bath’s policy therefore needs to ensure that, firstly, Division A’s manager is prepared to buy
20,000 sets of fittings from Division B and secondly, Division B is prepared to sell them at $65
per set. Since it is in Division B’s best interest to work to full capacity and the manager of
Division B knows that Division A can obtain fittings for $65 per set, it should not be difficult for
B to agree to sell to A at this price. A policy of negotiated transfer prices would achieve this
fairly quickly. However, Bath also needs to have a policy that divisions buy internally first,
where this would be in the best interests of the overall profitability of the company. This would
ensure that Division A buys the 20,000 sets of fittings from Division B. In this way, Bath’s
overall profit is maximised while also ensuring that divisional managers do not become
demotivated.
Actual Target
Financial perspective
Customer perspective
Number of first-time homebuyers given a mortgage
Internal processes
b. Using all of the information provided, including The People’s Bank’s vision and values,
discuss the performance of The People’s Bank in 20X6
Financial perspective
- Overall: mixed success
- ROCE: target 12%, only achieved 11% => investment made in IT, but still a good idead:
pursue vision & keep customer happy & prevent future fraud
- Interest income: higher => offering better interest rates to customers than competing
banks as the interest margin achieved slightly lower
- Amount of new lending to SME: failure to meet target => insufficient number of staff
trained
The People’s Bank has had a year of mixed success when looking at the extent to which it has
met its financial targets. Its return on capital employed (ROCE) shows how efficiently it has used
its assets to generate profit for the business. The target for the year was 12% but it has only
achieved an 11% return. The People’s Bank’s interest income, however, was in fact $0.5m
higher than its target, which is good. This may have been achieved by offering slightly better
interest rates to customers than competing banks, as the interest margin The People’s Bank
achieved is slightly lower than target. The most likely reason for the under target ROCE is
therefore probably the investment which The People’s Bank has made in IT security and
facilities for the disabled and visually impaired. Whilst this may have reduced ROCE, this
investment is essentially a good idea as it helps The People’s Bank pursue its vision and will
keep customers happy. It will also, in the case of the IT security investment, prevent the bank
and its customers from losing money from fraud in the future.
The other performance measure, the amount of new lending to SMEs, is a little disappointing,
given The People’s Bank’s stated value of making a difference to communities. The failure to
meet this target may well be linked to having an insufficient number of staff trained to provide
advice to SMEs and, consequently, fewer of them may have been successful in securing
additional finance.
Customer perspective
- Provide mortgages to new homeowners: exceed => pursue vision
- Customer complaints: beat target => improved processes at the bank/ỉmproved security
- Help the disabled and visually impaired => good for reputations & stated value
With regard to its customers, The People’s Bank has performed well in the year. It has exceeded
its target to provide mortgages to new homeowners by 6,000. This is helping The People’s Bank
pursue its vision of helping new homeowners. It has also managed to beat the target for customer
complaints such that there are only 1.5 complaints for every 1,000 customers, well below the
target of 2. This may be as a result of improved processes at the bank or improved security. It is
not clear what the precise reason is but it is definitely good for The People’s Bank’s reputation.
The bank has also exceeded both of its targets to help the disabled and visually impaired, which
is good for its reputation and its stated value of making services more accessible.
Internal processes
- Process simplified: exceed target => good, lower customer complaints levels
- Investment to improve IT system => less incidences of fraud
- Only 2 new services available instead of 5
- New systems prevented business from keeping its CO2 emissions to target level
The number of processes simplified within the bank has exceeded the target, which is good, and
the success of which may well be reflected in the lower customer complaints levels. Similarly,
the investment to improve IT systems has been a success, with only three incidences of fraud per
1,000 customers compared to the target of 10. However, perhaps because of the focus on this
part of the business, only two new services have been made available via mobile banking,
instead of the target of five, which is disappointing. Similarly, it is possible that some of the new
systems have prevented the business from keeping its CO2 emissions to their target level.
Learning and growth
- Hours of paid volunteer work & No. Community organization supported: exceed =>
additional costs, not meet target for ROCE
- Helping small businesses & the disadvantagesd: not quite met targets => shortfall in
training of employees to give advice to SMEs
- Trainee positions: missed target, no. of candidates not as high as planned + no control
The People’s Bank has succeeded in helping the community, exceeding both of its targets
relating to hours of paid volunteer work and number of community organisations supported by
volunteers or funding. These additional costs could have contributed to the bank not quite
meeting its target for ROCE.
However, the bank has not quite met its targets for helping small businesses and helping the
disadvantaged. As mentioned earlier, the shortfall in training of employees to give advice to
SMEs may have contributed to The People’s Bank’s failure to meet its target lending to SMEs.
As regards the percentage of trainee positions, the target was only just missed and this may well
have been because the number of candidates applying from these areas was not as high as
planned and the bank has no control over this.
Overall, the bank has had a fairly successful year, meeting many of its targets. However, it still
has some work to do in order to meet its stated values and continue to pursue its vision.
Jamair was founded in September 2007 and is one of a growing number of low-cost airlines in
the country of Shania.
Jamair’s strategy is to operate as a low-cost, high efficiency airline, and it does this by:
- Operating mostly in secondary cities to reduce landing costs
- Using only one type of aircraft in order to reduce maintenance and operational costs.
These planes are leased rather than bought outright
- Having only one category of seat class
- Having no pre-allocated seats or in-flight entertainment
- Focusing on e-commerce with customers both booking tickets and checking in for flights
online.
The airline was given an ‘on time arrival’ ranking of seventh best by the country’s aviation
authority, who rank all 50 of the country’s airlines based on the number of flights which arrive
on time at their destinations. 48 Jamair flights were cancelled in 2013 compared to 35 in 2012.
This increase was due to an increase in the staff absentee rate at Jamair from 3 days per staff
member per year to 4.5 days.
The average ‘ground turnaround time’ for airlines in Shania is 50 minutes, meaning that, on
average, planes are on the ground for cleaning, refuelling, etc for 50 minutes before departing
again. Customer satisfaction surveys have shown that 85% of customers are happy with the
standard of cleanliness on Jamair’s planes.
The number of passengers carried by the airline has grown from 300,000 passengers on a total of
3,428 flights in 2007 to 920,000 passengers on 7,650 flights in 2013. The overall growth of the
airline has been helped by the limited route licensing policy of the Shanian government, which
has given Jamair almost monopoly status on some of its routes. However, the government is now
set to change this policy with almost immediate effect, and it has become more important than
ever to monitor performance effectively.
Required:
(a) Describe each of the four perspectives of the balanced scorecard. (6 marks)
- Financial perspective – concerned with how a company looks to its shareholders. How
can it create value for them? There are three core financial themes which will drive the
business strategy: revenue growth and mix, cost reduction and asset utilisation.
- Customer perspective – considers how the organisation appears to customers. It should
identify the customer and market segments in which the business will compete. There is a
strong link between the customer perspective and the revenue objectives in the financial
perspective. If customer objectives are achieved, revenue objectives should be too.
- Internal perspective – requires the organisation to ask itself: ‘what must we excel at to
achieve our financial and customer objectives?’ It must identify the internal business
processes which are critical to the implementation of the organisation’s strategy. These
will include the innovation process, the operations process and the post-sales process.
- Learning and growth perspective – requires the organisation to ask itself whether it can
continue to improve and create value. The organisation must continue to invest in its
infrastructure – i.e. people, systems and organisational procedures – in order to improve
the capabilities which will help the other three perspectives to be achieved.
(b) For each perspective of the balanced scorecard, identify one goal together with a
corresponding performance measure which could be used by Jamair to measure the
company’s performance. The goals and measures should be specifically relevant to Jamair.
For each pair of goals and measures, explain why you have chosen them.
Financial perspective
- Fewer planes: Lease costs of plane per customer => operating efficiency (cover the cost)
- Increase seat revenue per plane: Revenue per available passenger mile => operating
efficiency
Customer perspective
- Flight on time: ranking from authority => currently 7th, customer more likely to use =>
increase revenue
- Reduce the number of flights cancelled: the number of flights cancelled => if flights are
seen to be cancelled frequently => customer will not want to use it, need to be reliable
Internal perspective
- Improve turnaround time on the ground: on the ground time => less time spent on the
ground means fewer planes are needed => reduce plane leasing costs
- Improve the cleanliness of planes: % of customer happy as reported in surveys => only
85%, can cause loss of revenue
- Develop the online booking system: % downtime => relies entirely on the booking
system, critical it can deal with growing number of customers
Innovation and growth
- Reduce the employee absentee rate: number of days absent per employee => workforce
reliable, at worse, absent staff lead to cancelled flights
- Increase ground crew training on cleaning and refueling procedures: number of days’
training per ground crew member => better trained, reduce time plane stays on the
ground => fewer planes required, lower costs + better cleaning => higher customer
satisfaction