in this video I'll teach you a system for remembering everything you read study or

learn I've been using the system for the last 7 years starting from learning
disease pathophysiology in medical school through to reading research articles and
learning science or reading books on productivity or business and the reason the
system works so consistently and so well is because it breaks down that process of
reading into two distinct stages the first stage is the consumption period and the
second stage is the digestion period most people think that by focusing on the
first stage and consuming more information they'll be able to therefore remember
and apply more information so they focus on trying to read faster or watching
lectures at triple speed or binge listening to audio books or watching hours of
YouTube tutorials but that is not how learning works and once we understand how
learning does work you'll see why my system is so effective you see when it comes
to remembering and applying information it's much less about what comes in to your
brain and it's much more about how much stays in your brain and that is what the
second stage the digestion period is all about and it's the part that is often
neglected so teach you a system for mastering both of these stages which in turn
increases your Aurora retention as well as your ability to actually use the
knowledge in the way that you need to but first we need to ask ourselves is it even
possible to remember everything you read and the short answer is no but here's the
secret trying to remember everything we read should not be the goal in the first
place and we know this because of a man who actually could remember everything this
man's name is Kim Peak and his story is so crazy that Hollywood made an entire
movie about him Kim Peak was a mega genius and his memory was ridiculous he was
able to memorize a book with such perfect recall that after reading a book one time
he would be able to write it out word for word with every comma and full stop back
to front he memorized so many maps and atlases that he could give you driving
directions between any two cities in the world and the path that he gave you was
mentally calculated to be the shortest distance now the reason K had such
supernatural abilities is because of a very rare medical condition he had called FG
syndrome he was born with macroy which means he had a larger brain and he had no
Corpus colossum which is basically the bundle of neurons that connect both
hemispheres of the brain together in scientists believe that because he didn't have
the normal pattern of neurons his brain adapted and developed Ved new connections
to compensate which I guess gave him like superhuman memory now I want you to
imagine that both you and Kim Peak were about to sit the same exam who do you think
would do better and the answer is that it actually depends on the exam you see
despite his superhuman memory Kim Peak struggled with reasoning and problem solving
which means that if the exam was at the junior levels of schooling which often
tests on the lower levels of of learning which involve a lot of memorization and
recall then Kim Peak would definitely win but if the exam was at a higher level
like University or postgraduate where the reasoning and problem solving the higher
orders of learning are examined as a higher priority then you may actually have the
edge now for most of you listening probably using the knowledge you have consumed
to reason and problem solve is kind of the whole point of why you're trying to read
and remember in the first place which basically means that it is not enough to
remember everything which is good because for most people that's not possible
anyway but it is possible to remember everything you need to remember in such a way
that we can use that knowledge in the way we need to and that is what the system
that I'll teach you helps you to achieve so to start using the system we have to
understand that not all information is equal in fact I break down the information
that I read into five different categories using the acronym Pacer and it's
important to be able to identify which category the information you're reading to
belongs to because for each category there are specific targeted processes that
then help you to deal with and manage that information more effectively and when we
use the wrong process for the specific category of information it makes remembering
and understanding what you read much harder much more timec consuming and much less
effective and that you're more likely to forget what you read it also increases the
chance of you entering the passive mode of reading which is where you get to the
bottom of a page and you can't even remember what you just read so the system goes
like this in the first part where we are consuming information we want to identify
which category what we are consuming belongs to using the Pacer acronym then during
stage two we digest what we have read using the targeted process for that category
which takes the information and stores it in our long-term memory through the
process called encoding so let's go through Pacer together so that you can
accurately identify the category of information you're trying to remember the p and
Pacer stands for procedural and procedural information is any information that
tells you how something should be executed for example this is a book that I used
during medical school that taught me about how to do a clinical examination like
listen to a heartbeat or take someone's blood pressure and a lot of the information
in this book is about the correct technique to perform the examination and some
subjects and domains have a lot of procedural information some great examples of
this would be coding and languages the targeted process for working with with and
mastering this type of procedural information is practice the key is that you want
to apply procedural information in real life as early as possible a lot of people
will spend time to read it and memorize it and write lots of notes about it and
then a week or two later they'll try to practice it but by then it's too late we've
already forgotten a lot of it and a lot of that time is just wasted instead as soon
as you take that procedural information into your brain try to apply it and
practice it as early as you can now straight away we run into a problem with using
this approach what if we're reading something and we don't have time to practice it
right now the answer is you either move on to something else or you stop consuming
anything and you wait until you have time to practice it but you do not waste your
time trying to just memor memorize it on the spot because here is the crucial part
about learning that everyone overlooks the two stages of consuming and digesting
must always be balanced everything you consume must be digested in order for you to
retain and use it only when stage one is followed by stage two does learning
actually occur if we're reading something and we don't have time time to use the
right process like practice then most people will say oh well I don't have time
right now I'm just going to get through as much of it as I can and they spend more
time reading and reading and essentially just consuming more and more but this is
the learning equivalent of overeating they haven't had a chance to digest it so
they're just going to end up vomiting it all up again through the mental vomiting
process we call forgetting which is why for most people the amount that they forget
after reading is extremely high with some studies suggesting that up to 90% of what
is consumed is forgotten despite hours of consuming and if we're forgetting 90% of
what we read rather than consuming more and taking time away from the digesting it
actually makes more sense to spend less time consuming and more time on the
digesting and processing this increases your retention with which therefore
increases the amount of working knowledge you're able to build so earlier I said
what goes into your brain is less important than what stays in your brain and this
principle of balancing stage one consuming with stage two digesting is important
not just for procedural information but for every other category of PESA
unfortunately stage two digesting is almost completely neglected for the second
category of in the a of Pacer which stands for analogous analogous information is
actually one of the easiest types of information to work with and remember and
apply because analogous information is the information that is related to something
you already have prior knowledge about and even if we don't have direct prior
knowledge about it it may remind us indirectly of something that we do have
knowledge about for example let's say that we are an avid swimmer and we're
learning about the physiology of a muscle contraction when we look at that muscle
contraction cycle we might think hey that reminds me a lot about the swimming
technique I use and by connecting the new information about muscle contraction
physiology with what we already know our swimming technique we have created an
analogy and so that is analogous information and analogies can form with any prior
knowledge including knowledge within a topic itself in most fields of study there
are Concepts or patterns of Concepts and relationships that tend to repeat and
recur throughout that field you might have learned about how to solve a particular
type of problem last semester and now this semester this new problem solving
approach that you're learning for the first time reminds you a lot of that old
problem solving process and relating those two approaches is also an analogy so
when we're engaging in stage one the consumption period of reading we want to
actively be thinking about whether what we are reading is related to something that
we already have knowledge
about and once we identifi it as potentially analogous information the targeted
process we want to use here is critique this is the part I said everyone misses
once we create an analogy critiquing it means we examine critically how good that
analogy actually is for example with the analogy of muscle contraction and swimming
technique critiquing that analogy means asking ourselves in what way specifically
are these two things similar or related to each other in what ways are they
different in what situation does this analogy not make sense anymore and if there
are a lot of differences or a lot of conditions and situations where the analogy
breaks apart then is there a better analogy or can we extend or modify that analogy
to make it more comprehensive and more accurate this critiquing process massively
drives up our attention and depth of understanding of this new information and the
reason this works is because instead of new information just being new information
that your brain doesn't know what to do with we're actually extending it from what
we already know we're taking our existing Network and connecting it to the new
information straight away which is the reason why creating analogies has been shown
in studies repeatedly to be so powerful for our retention and understanding now at
this point you might be looking at the system and thinking this seems a little
forced it doesn't feel natural and you're right in fact it's crucial that you
understand that this is not natural and that's why it works if you have no time
pressure and it doesn't matter how well you learn something then you can learn and
read however you want but unfortunately what research has shown is that there are
clear biological limitations of the human brain to how much it can consume and
store into our memory in one go and in the modern day when there is so much we have
to learn it is very very easy to exceed that biological limit and then get
overwhelmed learning is extremely complicated so to be able to learn a lot in a
short amount of time reach a high level of knowledge a lot of processes need to go
right and this is why most people will Plateau on their learning ability and after
a point not really improve for the rest of their lives for me figuring out what
processes to care about and therefore what to improve on and then how to even
execute on those correctly took me at least 7 or 8 years of almost constant
experimentation and reading of research and coaching people to see what works for
them and honestly I got lucky because 10 15 years ago a lot of the research didn't
even exist which is why to make it easier for you I've started a free Weekly
Newsletter I take everything that I've learned that helps you become a more
efficient learner the things that have the highest chance of giving you success in
a short amount of time and I packaged them in a way that you can take and Implement
into your own learning in less than 10 15 minutes if you want to sign up to the
newsletter it's completely free I'll leave a link in the description for you now
getting back to peser you might notice that the way that I've written the a in PESA
is is like this it's this kind of strange shape there the reason is because a the
analogous information can exist within as a subset of procedural information for
example you could create an analogy on a set of instructions to make it simpler and
easier for you to understand and then later you go and practice it but analogous
information also exists as a subset within the next category of information which
is the C of Paca and this stands for conceptual if procedural information is the
how to do something then conceptual information is the what and for most science
subjects the majority of what you need to learn is conceptual conceptual
information includes facts and explanations theories and principles relationships
between Concepts and ways that that concept can be applied and in most cases we
need both the procedural and the conceptual knowledge to solve a problem and apply
our knowledge properly for example although this book goes through how to listen to
someone's heart I still need to have the conceptual knowledge about what I'm
listening to to be able to analyze that and make a conclusion on the diagnosis so
when we identify that a piece of text we're reading is conceptual type information
the process we want to use straight away is mapping nonlinear network based note
taking such as mind mapping is an efficient way of increasing your attention and
Mastery of conceptual knowledge because conceptual knowledge inherently exists in a
network although a textbook or a lecture might be delivered word after word in a
linear format if we look at the mind and knowledge of the person that wrote that
textbook it doesn't exist in a linear sentence by sentence structure their
knowledge and expertise exists in a highly connected network of information there
is no innate sequence of information an expert can start at any point and navigate
to any other point this is what allows an expert to do complex problem solving
because they can look at a problem understand what concepts are related and see how
those Concepts connect together to solve the problem whereas a beginner who's only
learned it at a surface level just sees individual separated Concepts and they
don't understand how they link together as a learner our job is not to remember the
sequence word for word our job is to try to recreate that network of knowledge that
the expert had and mapping is such a great technique because it forces us to not
only think about each fact and concept but also how they connect to each other to
form a bigger picture so when you are reading and consuming take some time to get
out a piece of paper or a tablet and make a map of the things that you're learning
and as you read more you add more to your map you move things around you reorganize
things as you read more you also digest more and your map grows remember analogous
information can also exist within conceptual information so you might find
Opportunities within conceptual information to create some analogies and you might
want to add those into your map as well even if the analogy doesn't make its way
into the map it could give you an idea in terms of how you want to structure your
ideas on your map now here's that same problem again let's say you reading but you
don't have time to draw a map or maybe you don't have anything to map on while
you're reading then again we need to slow down and consume less so that consumption
and digestion can stay balanced and if you don't you'll just end up overwhelmed
again and wasting time because not only are you going to forget a lot of what you
are consuming but now you've given the future version of you more work to do by
having to go and figure out what your forgotten and then Rec consume it again
anyway now the good news is that the digesting of procedural analogous and
conceptual information is easily the most timec consuming the E and the r of PESA
are much faster and easier to deal with I talk about e and are together because
they're both very similar to each other but pay close attention because the two are
actually so similar to each other that most people never distinguish between the
two and that can lead directly to hours of wasted time per week the E and Pacer
stands for evidence evidence type information is the information that helps make
conceptual information more concrete they're often very detailed sometimes very
technical pieces of information but they're useful because we can use these facts
or statistics or cases as examples to prove a conceptual point for example we could
understand conceptually how World War I started but we also need to know the
evidence information of date certain specific events occurred between which
specific people at which specific location to make that concept more concrete and
the key process for evidence type information is to store and rehearse store means
that you just colle collect that information and note it down somewhere you could
add it to your conceptual map or you could add it to a second brain system using
something like notion or Rome or obsidian or you can put it onto flashcards you
could even just write them down on a document somewhere with all the other things
that you are storing this should happen as soon as you identify it so as you are
consuming the information and you identify that this piece of information is an
Evidence type we go ahead and straight away store it the rehearsing part of it
comes a little later we put aside time to do the rehearsal and rehearsing the
information is the key to improving our retention of evidence type information
rehearsing means that we think about how we will need to use this piece of
information how are we going to apply it what type of conceptual information is
this an example of we then challenge ourselves by using an applying that
information in the way that we will need to use it this means solving problems or
writing detailed answers to questions or creating explanations teaching it to other
people or maybe writing essays that use that piece of evidence as a supporting
example for a wider concept and so while we store the information while we consume
it the rehearsing happens later maybe at the end of the day or at the end of the
week but do not waste time while you are cons assuming trying to just memorize and
read and reread and writing copious notes on that piece of information otherwise
you are not going to have enough time for the PA and C the first three types of
information which is what forms the foundation of knowledge that the evidence type
needs to build off of in the first place now evidence type information is very
similar to the final type which is the r of PESA and this stands for reference type
information reference information
is the easiest to deal with it is all of the Nitty Gritty very specific detailed
bits of information that don't really change your conceptual understanding they're
not particularly that important they're not analogous and they're not procedural
but for whatever reason we might need to know this later this might be something
like the exact value of a mathematical con Conant or a specific Gene involved in a
particular mutation or the name of a very specific molecule of a disease or maybe a
list of attributes used to define a variable for coding and the process we use to
deal with this type of information is the same as for evidence almost it's store
and rehearse the same things the storing part exactly the same you Chuck it in a
second brand and your flash cards wherever makes sense for you but if you need to
be able to record this information from memory and you can't like refer back to
your notes when you need to use it then you probably want to use something like
flash cards because the rehearse part is a little different because reference type
information is by definition not very conceptually important anyway it's quite hard
to use this for problem solving or as part of like an extended discussion or answer
the way we're probably going to use this information is just Direct fact recoil
which is why something like flash cards using a space repetition active recoil
strategy like an app like ankey is going to be the best way to handle reference
type information so as you're reading and you're thinking hey this might be a
reference type information you dump it into your flashcards and you put aside like
30 minutes every day or whatever to just go through your flash cards to do your
rehearsal but please again absolutely do not waste time while you're reading trying
to just read and reread and write notes and just memorize this information at the
time you need to use that time for the first three which forms the bulk of your
knowledge as I said earlier there are a lot of things that need to go right to be
able to learn a lot of information in a short period of time and wasting time on
trying to memorize reference information while you are reading it instead of
spending that time on the first three types is one of the worst offenders and as
soon as you get into that mind frame of reading something and then rereading it
again trying to get it into your head you can say goodbye to your learning
efficiency so now you know the five types of information for you to try to identify
as you consume in stage one and the appropriate targeted process that will help you
to digest that information in stage two and the key to be able to retain a lot and
have a good high level of knowledge for what you have consumed is to keep that
stage one and stage two balanced however when it comes to learning efficiently this
just scratches the surface in fact if you look at this map of learning that
outlines the major processes that you need to be a consistently High performing
efficient learner what we talked about today is like barely a few percent of it so
if you want to start unpacking what those other processes look like without having
to dedicate a decade of your life to uh learning about it like I did then make sure
to check out my free newsletter the link is in the description thank you so much
for watching and I will see you in the next one