0% found this document useful (0 votes)
1 views2 pages

OOP Group Rating

The document is a rubric for evaluating Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) projects, detailing criteria such as application of OOP principles, class and object design, encapsulation, and error handling. Each criterion is scored on a scale from 5 to 10, with descriptions for developing, standard, and exemplary performance levels. The total score is out of 100, and the document emphasizes the importance of real-world application and effective presentation.

Uploaded by

Mark Larong
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
1 views2 pages

OOP Group Rating

The document is a rubric for evaluating Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) projects, detailing criteria such as application of OOP principles, class and object design, encapsulation, and error handling. Each criterion is scored on a scale from 5 to 10, with descriptions for developing, standard, and exemplary performance levels. The total score is out of 100, and the document emphasizes the importance of real-world application and effective presentation.

Uploaded by

Mark Larong
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Student Name: ______________________________________________________

Group Number: _____________ Date: ______________

Rubric for Object-Oriented Programming Developmental Output

Criteria Developing (5) Standard (8) Exemplary (10) Max


Points
Application of Incorrect or limited Correct use of core Comprehensive 10
OOP Principles use of core OOP OOP concepts with application of OOP
concepts (e.g., minor principles, including
inheritance, inconsistencies or advanced concepts
polymorphism, missing advanced like abstraction and
encapsulation). features. polymorphism.
Class and Classes and objects Classes and objects Classes and objects 10
Object Design are poorly are well-structured are highly
structured; lack but lack structured,
clear purpose or fail optimization or optimized, and
to model the advanced design effectively model
problem effectively. considerations. real-world
problems.
Encapsulation Poor encapsulation; Adequate Excellent 10
and Modularity code lacks encapsulation and encapsulation; code
modularity, leading modularity with is highly modular,
to redundancy and minor cohesive, and
weak separation of redundancies or demonstrates strong
concerns. weak cohesion in separation of
some areas. concerns.
Inheritance and Limited or incorrect Inheritance is Advanced use of 10
Reusability use of inheritance; applied effectively inheritance;
minimal or no but may lack promotes high
emphasis on code clarity or fail to reusability and
reusability. optimize minimizes
reusability. redundancy in the
code.
Polymorphism Minimal or incorrect Polymorphism is Polymorphism is 10
use of implemented extensively and
polymorphism; correctly but not effectively applied
lacks dynamic used effectively to create flexible
behavior where it is throughout the and scalable
appropriate. project. solutions.
Error Handling Poor error handling; Basic error Robust error 10
and Debugging system crashes or handling handling; system
behaves implemented; gracefully handles
unpredictably under system handles exceptions and
invalid input or most common provides meaningful
exceptions. issues but misses feedback.
edge cases.
Code Code is poorly Code is adequately Code is clean, well- 10
Readability and written, lacks written and organized, and
Documentation comments, and is documented but thoroughly
difficult to lacks clarity in documented with
understand. some sections. meaningful
comments.
Testing and Minimal or no Sufficient testing Extensive testing 10
Validation testing conducted; conducted with conducted; results
results do not minor issues or demonstrate high
demonstrate limited coverage of reliability, accuracy,
reliability or edge cases. and robustness.
functionality of the
system.
Real-World System has limited System System is highly 10
Application or no practical demonstrates applicable to real-
application; focuses moderate real- world scenarios and
solely on theoretical world applicability demonstrates clear
implementation. with minor benefits and
limitations. adaptability.
Presentation Lacks clarity or Presentation is Presentation is 10
and Delivery logical flow; fails to clear and organized highly engaging,
effectively but could be more well-organized, and
communicate engaging or thoroughly
project details and thorough. communicates all
significance. aspects of the
project.

Total Score: ______ / 100

Criteria Breakdown

1. Application of OOP Principles: Evaluates the understanding and implementation of


OOP concepts like encapsulation, inheritance, polymorphism, and abstraction.
2. Class and Object Design: Assesses the logical design of classes and objects in relation
to the problem domain.
3. Encapsulation and Modularity: Measures how well code is organized into modular,
cohesive units.
4. Inheritance and Reusability: Reviews the use of inheritance to promote code reusability
and minimize redundancy.
5. Polymorphism: Examines the use of polymorphism to create flexible and extensible
code.
6. Error Handling and Debugging: Focuses on the system's ability to handle errors
gracefully and its debugging strategies.
7. Code Readability and Documentation: Evaluates the clarity of the code and the quality
of comments or documentation.
8. Testing and Validation: Considers the comprehensiveness of testing performed and the
reliability of results.
9. Real-World Application: Reviews how well the project addresses practical, real-world
problems.
10. Presentation and Delivery: Assesses how effectively the project is communicated and
presented.

You might also like