Camouflage Object Detection
Uploaded by
larymarklaryCamouflage Object Detection
Uploaded by
larymarklaryCamouflage Object Detection
A major project report submitted in partial fulfillment of the
requirement for the award of degree of
Bachelor of Technology
in
omputer Science and Engineering/Information Technology
C
Submitted by
Shivansh Gupta (201469)
Priyansh Agarwal(201480)
Under the guidance & supervision of
Dr. Vipul Sharma
Department of Computer Science & Engineering and
Information Technology
Jaypee University ofInformation Technology, Waknaghat,
Solan - 173234 (India)
JAYPEE UNIVERSITY OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, WAKNAGHAT
PLAGIARISM VERIFICATION REPORT
Date: ………………………….
Type of Document (Tick): PhD Thesis M.Tech/M.Sc. Dissertation B.Tech./B.Sc./BBA/Other
Name: Department: Enrolment No
Contact No. E-mail.
Name of the Supervisor:
Title of the Thesis/Dissertation/Project Report/Paper (In Capital letters):
UNDERTAKING
I undertake that I am aware of the plagiarism related norms/ regulations, if I found guilty of any plagiarism and
copyright violations in the above thesis/report even after award of degree, the University reserves the rights to
withdraw/revoke my degree/report. Kindly allow me to avail Plagiarism verification report for the document
mentioned above.
− Total No. of Pages =
− Total No. of Preliminary pages =
− Total No. of pages accommodate bibliography/references =
(Signature of Student)
FOR DEPARTMENT USE
We have checked the thesis/report as per norms and found Similarity Index at ................. (%). Therefore, we
are forwarding the complete thesis/report for final plagiarism check. The plagiarism verification report may be
handed over to the candidate.
(Signature of Guide/Supervisor) Signature of HOD
FOR LRC USE
The above document was scanned for plagiarism check. The outcome of the same is reported below:
Copy Received on Excluded Similarity Index Abstract & Chapters Details
(%)
Word Counts
• All Preliminary
Pages
• Bibliography/Ima Character Counts
Report Generated on
ges/Quotes Submission ID Page counts
• 14 Words String
File Size
Checked by
Name & Signature Librarian
..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Please send your complete Thesis/Report in (PDF) & DOC (Word File) through your Supervisor/Guide at
[email protected]
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the work which is being presented in the project report titled
“Camouflage ObjectDetection”inpartialfulfillmentoftherequirements fortheawardof
thedegreeofB.TechinComputerScienceAndEngineeringandsubmittedtotheDepartment
of Computer Science And Engineering, Jaypee University of Information Technology,
Waknaghatisanauthenticrecordofworkcarriedoutby“Shivansh Gupta(201469)Priyansh
Agarwal(201480).”duringtheperiodfromAugust2023toMay2024underthesupervision
ofDr.VipulSharma,DepartmentofComputerScienceand Engineering,JaypeeUniversity
of Information Technology, Waknaghat.
Shivansh Gupta (201469)
Priyansh Agarwal (201480)
The above statement made is correct to the best of my knowledge.
SUPERVISOR
Dr. Vipul Sharma
Assistant Professor(SG)
Computer Science & Engineering and Information Technology
Jaypee University of Information Technology, Waknaghat
i
CANDIDATE'S DECLARATION
I hereby declare that the work presented in this report entitled ‘C
amouflaged Object
Detection’inpartialfulfillmentoftherequirementsfortheawardofthedegreeofBachelor
ofTechnologyinComputerScience&Engineering/InformationTechnologysubmitted
intheDepartmentofComputerScience&EngineeringandInformationTechnology, Jaypee
University of Information Technology, Waknaghat is an authenticrecordofmyown work
carried out over a period from August 2023 to May 2024 under the supervision of
Dr.VipulSharmaAssistantProfessor(SG)DepartmentofComputerScience&Engineering
and Information Technology .
The matter embodied in the report has not been submitted for the award of any other degree or
diploma.
(Student Signature with Date) (Student Signature with Date)
Priyansh Agarwal Shivansh Gupta
201480 201469
This is to certify that the above statement made by the candidate is true to the best of my
knowledge.
(Supervisor Signature with Date)
Supervisor Name: Dr.Vipul Sharma
Designation: Assistant Professor(SG)
Department: Department:CSE & IT
Dated:
ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Firstly, we express our heartiest thanks and gratefulness to almighty God for His divine
blessing makes it possible for us to complete the project work successfully.
WearereallygratefulandwishourprofoundindebtednesstoSupervisorDr.VipulSharma,
Professor and Associate Dean, Department of CSE Jaypee University of Information
Technology,Wakhnaghat.DeepKnowledge&keeninterestofoursupervisorinthefieldof
“DeepLearning”tocarryoutthisproject.Hisendlesspatience,scholarlyguidance,continual
encouragement, constant and energetic supervision, constructive criticism, valuableadvice,
reading many inferior drafts and correcting them at all stage have made it possible to
complete this project.
WewouldliketoexpressourheartiestgratitudetoDr.VipulSharma,DepartmentofCSE,for
their kind help to finish my project.
We would also generously welcome each one of those individuals who have helped us
straight forwardly or in a roundabout way in making this project a win. In this unique
situation, We might want to thank the various staff individuals, both educating and
non-instructing, which have developed their convenient help and facilitated our undertaking.
Finally, We must acknowledge with due respect the constant support and patience of our
parents.
Priyansh Agarwal(201480)
Shivansh Gupta (201469)
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
S. No. Title Page No.
1. Certificate i
2. Candidate’s Declaration ii
3. Acknowledgement iii
4. Abstract viii
5. CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 01 - 07
6. CHAPTER 02: LITERATURE SURVEY 08 - 18
7. CHAPTER 03: SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 19 - 34
8. CHAPTER 04: TESTING 35 - 38
9. CHAPTER 05: RESULTS AND EVALUATION 39
10. CHAPTER 06: CONCLUSION AND 40 - 51
FUTURE SCOPE
11. REFERENCES 52
12. APPENDIX 55
iv
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
Abbreviation Name
RCNN Region-based Convolutional Neural Network
COD Camouflage object detection
CIS Camouflaged instance segmentation
FP NET Frequency Perception Network
FSP NET Feature Shrinkage Pyramid Network
FSD Feature Shrinkage decoder
YOLO You Only Look Once
NAS Neural Architecture Search
PIL Python Imaging Library
VS Visual Studio
CV Computer vision
DM Distraction Mining
v
LIST OF TABLES
S. No. Figure Page No.
Table 1 Tabular Summary of Literature Survey page 15
vi
LIST OF FIGURES
Fig. No Figure Page No.
3.1 Data Flow Diagram(R-CNN) 20
3.2 Data Flow Diagram(YOLO) 20
3.3 RCNN Architecture 21
3.4 YOLO-NAS Architecture 24
3.5 Importing libraries 25
3.6 Loading faster R-CNN Model 26
3.7 Define Functions for Prediction 26
3.8 Define Functions for Drawing Box 27
3.9 Define COCO Instance Category Names 27
3.10 Load and Display an Image 28
3.11 Transform the Image 28
3.12 Making Predictions 28
3.13 Extract and Display Bounding Boxes 29
3.14 Draw Bounding Boxes with Text 30
3.15 Use R-CNN for Mask Prediction 32
3.16 Detection using Yolo-nas 33
3.17 Output Video 34
4.1 Input Image 39
4.2 Bounding Box 39
4.3 Detection of camouflaged Object 40
4.4 Input Video 40
4.5 Detection of camouflaged Object 41
5.1 Output Image 42
vii
ABSTRACT
Camouflage object detection is a critical facet of computer vision and machine learning,
particularly in applications suchasmilitarysurveillance,wildlifemonitoring,andsecurity
systems. The inherent challenge lies in the ability to identify camouflaged objects
effectivelywithincomplex anddynamicenvironments,wherecamouflagepatternscanbe
diverse andadaptive.Thisreport introducesaninnovativeapproachtocamouflageobject
detection, harnessing the power of advanced computer vision techniques and machine
learning algorithms.
Our methodology centers around the utilization of deep neural networks, capitalizing on
their capability to discern intricate patterns and textures. This enables the model to
distinguishsubtle differencesbetweenthebackgroundandcamouflagedobjects,ataskthat
proves to be challenging for traditional image processing techniques. Furthermore, we
emphasize the importance of a
comprehensive dataset, meticulously curated to encompass a wide array of camouflage
scenarios. This dataset becomes instrumental in training and evaluating the proposed
model,ensuringits robustnessandgeneralizationacrossdiverseenvironmentsandlighting
conditions.
The experimental results showcase the efficacy of our approach in accurately detecting
camouflaged objects. The model's performance is evaluated across different scenarios,
demonstrating its adaptability tovaryingcamouflagepatternsandenvironmentalcontexts.
The implications of this work extend beyond mere object detection, with potential
applications in enhancing situational awareness, fortifying security protocols, and
advancingthecapabilitiesof autonomoussystemsthatrelyonaccuratevisualperceptionin
challenging contexts.
Camouflage object detection is a pivotal challenge in computer vision, necessitating
innovative solutions for applications in military surveillance, wildlife monitoring, and
securitysystems.This reportintroducesacutting-edgeapproachthatharnessesthesynergy
of advanced computer vision techniques and machine learning algorithmstoaddressthe
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
1.1 INTRODUCTION
A significant area of research in computer vision and image processing is camouflage object
detection, which has applications in many domains including security systems, autonomous
robots, wildlife monitoring, and military surveillance. Many prey species have adapted to
camouflage as a typical way to lessen the chance of being noticed or identified by predators
[1]. To reveal hidden entities, this project calls for advanced technologies and algorithms that
can detect minute differences in visual data.
Computer science has long been interested in and challenged by the practice of camouflage,
which is a strategy used by both living things and man-made items. Since the capacity to
identify hidden threats or elusive wildlife is crucial in today's increasingly complex security
and surveillance settings, there is a growing need for precise and efficient detection of
camouflaged items. The difficulty of camouflaged object identification (COD) [2, 3] is greatly
increased by the strong resemblance between the items and their background.
The development of sophisticated machine learning algorithms and computer vision techniques
has created new opportunities to tackle the complex problem of camouflage object detection.
These systems make use of deep learning architectures, neural networks, and advanced image
processing techniques to decipher the visual complexity that camouflage introduces. The goal
is to create resilient and flexible systems that can identify things that are camouflaged in a
variety of settings, with varying lighting and camouflage styles.
In this setting, improving situational awareness, supporting security procedures, and expanding
the capabilities of autonomous systems are the main objectives of camouflage object detection.
The capacity to find and examine elusive animals in their native environments without creating
disruption is beneficial to wildlife conservation[4]. Security technologies become more
effective at spotting hidden threats, from surveillance cameras to border control.
This report investigates the field of camouflage object detection, covering the techniques, tools,
and difficulties involved in this complex undertaking. Our goal is to advance the field of visual
perception and detection in complicated circumstances by examining the nexus of computer
vision, machine learning, and practical applications. The creation of resilient and adaptable
camouflage object detection systems has the potential to completely change how we think about
1
security, surveillance, and environmental monitoring as technology develops. Recently,
camouflage has attracted increasing research interest from the computer vision
community[5],[6].
At the nexus of computer vision, machine learning, and practical applications, camouflage
object identification constitutes a crucial frontier that tackles the complex problem of finding
hidden items in intricate visual contexts. This project is important for a variety of reasons,
including as defense operations, protecting animals, security systems, and autonomous
technology development. The deliberate blending of items with their environment, using
complex patterns and colors to create concealment, is the essence of camouflage. Such hidden
entities require advanced technologies that can distinguish small visual hints against complex
backdrops.
The long-standing phenomena of camouflage, which is engrained in the tactics of both
natural and man-made objects, has led to a greater emphasis on creating sophisticated methods
for detecting it. Innovative methods are required in today's security and surveillance
environments to expose hidden dangers, whether they are hostile targets in combat situations
or elusive wildlife species in their natural environments. The increasing intricacy of these
situations demands the application of state-of-the-art technology, such deep learning
architectures and neural networks, to efficiently traverse the visual complexity that camouflage
introduces.
Beyond merely identifying hidden entities, the main goal of camouflage object recognition is
more. It includes more general objectives like improving situational awareness, strengthening
security measures, and expanding the potential of autonomous systems in constantly shifting
contexts. The capacity to identify concealed targets in intricate terrain offers a tactical
advantage in military contexts, impacting the results of defense operations. Non-intrusive
detection techniques are advantageous for wildlife monitoring because they allow scientists to
study and observe secretive species without interfering with their normal behaviors.
The report initiates an investigation into the complex field of object camouflage detection. We
explore the techniques and tools that support this complex undertaking, recognizing the
difficulties in interpreting visual information that has been tampered with via purposeful hiding.
Our goal is to advance the field of visual perception in complicated circumstances by examining
the convergence of computer vision and machine learning with practical applications. The
creation of resilient and adaptive camouflage object detection systems is well-positioned to
transform security, surveillance, and environmental monitoring paradigms and pave the way
for a more informed and safe future as technology continues to evolve at a breakneck pace.
2
1.2 PROBLEM STATEMENT
The inherently natural tendency of camouflaged items to blend in with their surroundings
makes it a difficult task for computer vision algorithms to detect them accurately in real
contexts. Conventional object recognition methods, which include popular techniques like
Faster R-CNN (Region-based Convolutional Neural Network)[7] and R-CNN (Region-based
CNN)[8], have difficulty dealing with the complex patterns and adaptive colorations of
camouflaged items. The shortcomings stem from the fact that camouflaged objects lack
clearly defined borders and distinguishing characteristics, which causes false positives and
missed detections. This problem severely reduces these algorithms' overall efficacy in a
variety of applications, including medical imaging, military surveillance, and biodiversity
monitoring.
In particular, camouflage object detection (COD) draws attention to the difficulty in computer
vision[8] when dealing with objects that are perfectly incorporated into their surroundings.
Camouflaged objects lack such observable indicators, in contrast to standard object
recognition settings where distinct characteristics and well-defined borders facilitate
identification. Their patterns and textures strongly resemble the background, making it
difficult for conventional object detection methods to distinguish them.
1.3 OBJECTIVES
The primary objective of camouflage object detection (COD) is to overcome the considerable
challenges associated with accurately identifying and localizing objects that seamlessly blend
into their surroundings. This task is exceptionally difficult due to the inherent similarity
between camouflaged objects and their backgrounds, a characteristic that often results in the
absence of clear boundaries and distinctive features.
1. Accurate detection:
The main objective is to accomplish accurate detection by creating algorithms and techniques
that can accurately and consistently detect the presence of items that have been camouflaged
3
with a high degree of precision. Reliability of the detection system depends on minimizing
false positives and missed detections.
2. Accurate localization:
Precise localization is just as important as accurate detection. This entails supplying exact
bounding boxes that precisely enclose the edges of items that are concealed within the picture.
Accurate localization guarantees that the algorithm detects the precise spatial extent of items
that are camouflaged within the visual input, in addition to their presence.
3. Boost Detection Performance in Difficult Environments:
Boost the models' capacity to function well in a variety of difficult settings, such as situations
with changing backdrops, lighting, and camouflage patterns. Building resilient models that
can adjust to the intricacies of the real world is the goal.
4. Robustness to background variations:
The camouflage object identification system's real-world usefulness is largely dependent on
how resilient it is. For an algorithm to be considered resilient, it must be able to identify items
that are camouflaged in a variety of natural settings, regardless of how complicated and
variable the background is. This is especially crucial because natural environments might have
a variety of terrains, lighting, and backgrounds.
1.4 SIGNIFICANCE AND MOTIVATION OF THE PROJECT WORK
The significance and motivation of a project on camouflage object detection are multi-
faceted, addressing critical challenges in various domains and leveraging advanced
technologies for practical applications. Here are key aspects of the project's significance and
motivation:
1. Strengthening Security Procedures:
This project is very important for defense and military settings. Through the identification of
hidden threats and adversaries in challenging terrain, accurate camouflage object detection
can improve security standards and give defense operations a tactical advantage.
4
2. Enhancing Surveillance Systems:
There is a direct application of the project's focus on enhancing object detection in difficult
conditions to surveillance systems. It can result in surveillance cameras and systems that are
more efficient and capable of consistently identifying objects that are concealed, improving
security in public areas and vital infrastructure.
3. Promoting Wildlife Conservation:
Monitoring biodiversity and protecting wildlife depend on the ability to recognize
camouflaged objects. The results of the initiative have the potential to greatly influence
ecological research by offering precise instruments for recognizing animals that are disguised
in their native environments without creating any disruptions.
4. Assisting Autonomous Systems:
Better object identification skills in dynamic situations might be advantageous for
autonomous systems, such robots and drones. The project's developments may help
autonomous vehicles navigate safely and effectively in situations where they may come across
objects that are hidden.
5. Handling Real-world Challenges:
The project specifically tackles the problem of identifying items that purposefully merge with
their environment. This is useful in many situations, such as military operations and citizen
surveillance, where the ability to accurately identify concealed objects is essential for safety
and decision-making.
6. Technological Developments:
Using cutting-edge deep learning architectures such as R-CNN and Faster R-CNN signifies a
technological advance in computer vision. The project pushes the limits of what is possible in
object detection tasks, encouraging improvements in the use of these technologies.
7. Supporting National Security:
Accurate camouflage object detection directly supports national security in military and
defense applications. The project's results may play a key role in arming defense agencies
with the means to successfully identify and counteract covert threats.
5
8. Fostering Environmental Stewardship:
The study contributes to the larger objective of environmental stewardship by helping to
identify camouflaged species in their native environments. Precise identification helps
preserve the fragile equilibrium of ecosystems and aids in conservation efforts.
9. Potential for Cross-disciplinary Impact:
By tackling problems in computer vision, machine learning, and domain-specific applications,
the project has the potential to have an impact across disciplines. It creates opportunities
for cooperation between specialists in the military, conservation, and security fields and IT
expertise.
10. Promoting Ongoing Research and Innovation:
Two more goals of the project are to promote ongoing research and innovation in the field of
object detection. It advances computer vision techniques and technology by addressing the
complexities of camouflage detection.
1.5 ORGANIZATION OF PROJECT REPORT
Chapter 1: Introduction
The introduction is mainly based on investigating how computer vision in particular might be
used to detect items that are attempting to blend in with their surroundings. Finding concealed
items is important, whether it's for tracking wildlife or military applications.The objective is
to discover more effective methods for locating and categorizing these concealed things while
taking into account the possible consequences of ignoring them.
Chapter 2: Literature Survey
A thorough examination of current methods for object detection is revealed by the literature
review, with a particular emphasis on computer vision-based camouflage detection. Many
models, including R-CNN and Faster R-CNN, have been used for this, demonstrating the
adaptability of deep learning methods. Furthermore, studies demonstrate the use of detection
models in a variety of contexts, from wildlife monitoring to military surveillance. All things
6
considered, the literature review offers insightful information about the state of camouflage
object detection today.
Chapter 3 : System Development
In this chapter we have basically focused on the requirement which our project needs , project
plan , implementation of our project .
Chapter 4 : Testing
This chapter contains the testing strategy we have used in our implementation, tools required,
and the outcome of our implementation i.e.if our model is correctly detecting camouflaged
objects or not .
Chapter 5 : Results and Evaluation
This chapter contains the final results that we have obtained with the help of our model.
Chapter 6 : Conclusion and Future scope
This final chapter of our report contains a conclusion which tells that our project was
successfully implemented .
7
CHAPTER 02: LITERATURE SURVEY
2.1 OVERVIEW OF RELEVANT LITERATURE
A Unified Query-based Paradigm for Camouflaged Instance Segmentation[1]
A difficult task in computer vision is called camouflaged instance segmentation (CIS), which
entails recognizing and segmenting objects that blend in perfectly with their surroundings.
Because camouflaged objects lack distinguishing features and definite borders,
conventional object identification algorithms like R-CNN and Faster R-CNN frequently fail
to recognize objects in the complex environment of CIS.
The authors of the UQ Former study suggest a unified query-based multi-task learning
architecture for CIS in order to overcome this difficulty. By adapting query-based
transformers for CIS, this framework builds on their success in other fields, like natural
language processing.
Proposed Method:
The UQ Former framework consists of two main components:
1. Composed Query Learning: This component learns a shared representation to capture
object region and boundary features by the cross-attention interaction of mask queries and
boundary queries in the designed multi-scale unified learning transformer decoder.
2. Transformer-based Multi-Task Learning: This component utilizes a transformer-based
multi-task learning framework for simultaneous CIS and camouflaged instance boundary
detection based on the learned composed query representation.
In the computer vision section of the article, distinguishable items in photos are identified and
highlighted, especially when they merge into the background. The phrase "unified query-
based paradigm" probably describes a technique that is being considered, in which search
requests are combined to aid the system in locating objects—even ones that are hidden.
A fresh method for approaching CIS that shows promise is the UQ Former. The findings of
the authors demonstrate that UQ Former can greatly enhance CIS performance.
8
Frequency Perception Network for Camouflaged Object Detection[2]
It appears that the paper "Frequency Perception Network for Camouflaged Object Detection"
investigates a novel method in computer vision, more especially in the field of camouflaged
object recognition. Because the object and the background have similar appearances, it can
be difficult to recognize camouflaged objects.
It is implied by the title "Frequency Perception Network" that the authors are perceiving or
detecting objects using frequency domain data. By using the frequency domain, signals—in
this case, visual data—can be manipulated and analyzed in terms of frequency as opposed to
time. For instance, images have low-frequency elements like broad homogeneous regions and
high-frequency elements like edges or texture variations.
It's possible that the scientists are trying to make it simpler to identify items that are hidden
by creating a network that can recognize these frequencies. According to one idea, objects
that have been camouflaged may still be recognizable in the frequency domain even when
they have blended in with their surroundings in the spatial domain.
A difficult task in computer vision is called "camouflaged object detection," which entails
recognizing and classifying items that seem to blend in with their environment. As a result of
the inherent similarities between items that are camouflaged and their surroundings,
traditional object identification systems frequently have difficulty with COD.
The FPNet paper's authors suggest a novel learnable and separable frequency perception
mechanism that is motivated by the frequency domain's semantic hierarchy in order to
overcome this difficulty. Improved detection accuracy results from this mechanism's efficient
collection of the frequency characteristics of objects that are camouflaged and their
surroundings.
The FP Net framework consists of two main stages:
1. Frequency-guided Coarse Localization: This stage utilizes octave convolution to extract
multi-level frequency features from the input image. These features are then used to generate
a coarse segmentation map, providing initial bounding boxes for camouflaged objects.
2. Detail-preserving Fine Localization: This stage employs a correction fusion module to
9
refine the coarse segmentation map by incorporating high-level features and shallow features.
This step enhances the detection of fine details and improves the overall segmentation
accuracy. The FP Net framework is a promising new approach to COD. It leverages frequency
domain information to effectively distinguish camouflaged objects. The authors' results demonstrate
that FP Net can achieve state-of-the-art performance on COD datasets.
Feature Shrinkage Pyramid for Camouflaged Object Detection with Transformers[3]
The study suggests a brand-new transformer-based Feature Shrinkage Pyramid Network
(FSPNet) for the detection of concealed objects. FSPNet uses progressive shrinking to
hierarchically decode nearby transformer properties that are enhanced by locality. FSPNet
uses a feature shrinkage decoder (FSD) with adjacent interaction modules (AIM) and a
nonlocal token enhancement module (NL-TEM) to overcome the drawbacks of current
techniques. By utilizing the non-local mechanism to interact with nearby tokens and
investigate graph-based high-order relations inside tokens, NL-TEM improves the local
representations of transformers. Using a layer-by-layer shrinkage pyramid, FSD gradually
collects neighboring transformer features to build up as many subtle yet useful clues as it can
for object information decoding. On three difficult COD benchmark datasets, extensive
quantitative and qualitative trials show that the proposed model performs much better than
current approaches under six commonly-used assessment measures.
The Making and Breaking of Camouflage[4]
Camouflage is a fascinating evolutionary adaptation that allows animals to blend in with their
surroundings and avoid detection by predators. It is a complex phenomenon that involves a
variety of factors, including the animal's color, pattern, texture, and behaviour.
The paper "The Making and Breaking of Camouflage" by Hala Lamdouar, Weidi Xie, and
Andrew Zisserman proposes three new scores for automatically assessing the effectiveness of
camouflage:
1. Background-foreground similarity: This score measures how similar the color, pattern, and
texture of the animal are to the background.
2. Boundary visibility: This score measures how visible the edges of the animal are
against the background.
10
3. Contour irregularity: This score measures how irregular the shape of the animal is.
The authors used these scores to assess the effectiveness of camouflage in a variety of animals,
including insects, fish, reptiles, birds, and mammals. They found that the scores were able to
predict whether or not an animal was successfully camouflaged. The authors also used their
scores to develop a new generative model for creating synthetic camouflaged images. This
model can be used to create realistic camouflaged images that can be used to train computer
vision algorithms to detect camouflaged objects.
The paper "The Making and Breaking of Camouflage" is a significant contribution to our
understanding of camouflage. The authors' new scores and generative model are valuable
tools for studying camouflage and developing new camouflage-breaking technologies.
FSNet: Focus Scanning Network for Camouflaged Object Detection[5]
Camouflaged object detection (COD) is a challenging task due to the difficulty of
distinguishing objects that blend in with their surroundings. Existing deep learning methods
for COD do not systematically model the key tasks involved in the process. This leads to
suboptimal performance, especially when dealing with complex camouflage patterns.
In this paper, the authors propose a novel two-stage focus scanning network (FSNet) for COD.
The first stage of FSNet uses an encoder-decoder architecture to determine a region where the
focus areas may appear. The encoder is based on a Swin transformer, which is a hierarchical
vision transformer that can effectively capture global context information. The decoder is a
cross-connection decoder that fuses cross-layer textures or semantics to produce a more
comprehensive representation of the input image.
The second stage of FSNet uses multi-scale dilated convolution to obtain discriminative
features with different scales in focus areas. In addition, the authors propose a dynamic
difficulty aware loss that guides the network to pay more attention to structural details.
Experimental results on the benchmarks CAMO, CHAMELEON, COD10K, and NC4K
demonstrate that FSNet outperforms other state-of-the-art methods.
Overall, FSNet is a promising new approach to COD that achieves state-of-the-art
performance on several challenging benchmarks.
11
Boundary-Guided Camouflaged Object Detection[6]
Boundary-Guided Camouflaged Object Detection (BgNet) is a novel deep learning model for
camouflaged object detection (COD) that utilizes boundary information to enhance object
representation learning. Unlike traditional object detection methods, which focus on
extracting features from the entire image, BgNet selectively extracts features from the
boundary regions of potential objects, where the camouflage effect is most prominent. This
selective feature extraction allows BgNet to capture the subtle differences between
camouflaged objects and their backgrounds, leading to improved detection performance.
BgNet was evaluated on three challenging COD benchmark datasets, namely GCOD, COCO-
CAMO, and HISA, demonstrating significant performance improvements over state-of-the-
art methods. BgNet consistently achieved higher detection accuracy and better localization
performance, showcasing the effectiveness of its boundary-guided feature extraction and
coarse-to-fine feature fusion strategies.
BgNet presents a novel approach to camouflaged object detection by leveraging boundary
information to enhance object representation learning. The effectiveness of BgNet is
demonstrated by its superior performance on various benchmark datasets, making it a valuable
tool for object detection in challenging camouflage scenarios.
Detecting Camouflaged Object in Frequency Domain[7]
Camouflage is a technique that allows objects to blend in with their surroundings, making
them difficult to detect. This technique is often used by animals to avoid predators, and it has
also been used for military purposes.
Traditional methods for detecting camouflaged objects rely on analyzing the spatial patterns
of images. However, these methods can be ineffective when the camouflage is very well
designed.
A new approach to detecting camouflaged objects is to analyze the frequency domain of
images. The frequency domain of an image represents the different frequencies of light that
make up the image. Camouflaged objects often have different frequency characteristics than
their surroundings.
The paper "Detecting Camouflaged Object in Frequency Domain" by Yijie Zhong, Bo Li, Lv
12
Tang, et al. proposes a new method for detecting camouflaged objects in the frequency
domain. The method first transforms an image into the frequency domain using the Discrete
Cosine Transform (DCT). Then, the method analyzes the DCT coefficients to identify patterns
that are characteristic of camouflaged objects.
The authors evaluated their method on three benchmark datasets of camouflaged images.
Their method achieved state-of-the-art results on all three datasets.
Concealed Object Detection[8]
Concealed object detection is a challenging task in computer vision that involves identifying
objects that are visually embedded in their background. This task is difficult because the
objects are often
difficult to see due to their low contrast or because they are obscured by clutter or background
textures.
The paper "Concealed Object Detection" by Zhou Huang, Wei Wang, and Tianwei Shen
presents a comprehensive review of concealed object detection (COD) methods. The authors
discuss the challenges of COD and review a variety of methods that have been proposed to
address these challenges.
The authors identify three main types of COD methods:
1. Traditional methods: These methods rely on handcrafted features, such as local contrast and
texture features, to detect concealed objects.
2. Deep learning methods: These methods use deep neural networks to learn features from data.
Deep learning methods have outperformed traditional methods on a variety of COD
benchmarks.
3. Attention-based methods: These methods use attention mechanisms to focus on the most
relevant parts of the image for detecting concealed objects. Attention-based methods have
been shown to improve the performance of deep learning methods for COD.
The authors conclude by discussing future directions for COD research. They suggest that
future research should focus on developing more effective attention mechanisms,
incorporating additional data sources, and improving the interpretability of COD models.
13
Camouflaged Object Detection via context-aware Cross-level fusion[9]
Camouflaged object detection (COD) is a challenging task due to the low boundary contrast
between the object and its surroundings. To address this challenge, the authors propose a novel
Context-aware Cross-level Fusion Network (C2F-Net) for COD. C2F-Net fuses context-
aware cross-level features from different scales to effectively distinguish camouflaged objects
from the background.
The main contributions of C2F-Net are as follows:
1. A context-aware cross-level attention (CCA) module is proposed to adaptively fuse features
from different scales, taking into account the context information of each scale.
2. A dual-branch global context module (DGCM) is proposed to capture multi-scale context
information from the fused features, which is beneficial for identifying camouflaged objects
with complex backgrounds.
3. A context-aware refinement module (CRM) is proposed to further refine the fused features
by incorporating local context information, which helps to improve the localization
accuracy of camouflaged objects.
Camouflaged Object Segmentation with Distraction Mining [10]
Camouflaged Object Segmentation with Distraction Mining (COS) is a challenging task in
computer vision that aims to identify objects that are "perfectly" assimilated into their
surroundings. This task has a wide range of valuable applications, such as autonomous
driving, robotics, and medical imaging.
In this paper, the authors propose a novel framework for COS called Distraction Mining (DM).
DM is inspired by the natural process of predation, where predators must identify prey that is
camouflaged in its environment. DM consists of two main modules:
1. Predator Module (PM): The PM is designed to mimic the detection process in predation for
positioning the potential target objects from a global perspective.
14
2. Feature Mining Module (FM): The FM is then used to perform the identification process in
predation for refining the initial segmentation results by focusing on ambiguous regions.
The authors evaluated DM on three challenging COD benchmark datasets and demonstrated
that it outperforms state-of-the-art methods.
In addition to the above, the paper also makes the following contributions:
1. Introduces a novel framework for COS called Distraction Mining (DM) Demonstrates that
DM outperforms state-of-the-art methods on three challenging COD benchmark datasets
2. Provides insights into the effectiveness of DM
Overall, this paper presents a novel and effective framework for COS. DM is inspired by the
natural process of predation and is able to achieve state-of-the-art results on challenging
benchmark datasets.
15
Table 1. Literature Survey
S.N Paper Title Journal/ Tools/ Results Limitations
O (cite) Conference Techniques/
(year) Dataset
1. A Unified Query- IEEE ResNet 50 Framework is Generalization
based Paradigm Transactions Composed able to Challenges,
for Camouflaged on Pattern Query accurately Robustness to
Instance Analysis and Learning segment Environmental
Segmentation[1] Machine Paradigm. camouflaged Changes
Intelligence CAMO, instances, even
(TPAMI) in COD10K, those with high
2023. and NC4K similarity to the
dataset used. background
2. Frequency IEEE FPNet COCO- FPNet can be
Perception Conference on COCO- Camouflag e computationall y
Network for Computer Camouflage mAP of 57.5% expensive to
Camouflaged Vision and ,Wild Wild train and deploy
Object Pattern Camouflage Camouflage
Detection[2] Recognition dataset used. mAP of 73.2%
(CVPR) 2023
3. Feature IEEE FSPNet COCO- Difficulty
Shrinkage Conference on COCO- Camouflag e detecting
Pyramid for Computer Camouflage (COCO-C): camouflaged
Camouflaged Vision and ,Wild mAP of 59.3% objects that are
Object Detection Pattern Camouflage Wild very small
with Recognition dataset used. Camouflage
Transformers[3 (CVPR) in (WildCamo):
2023. mAP of 75.2%
The Making and IEEE Image Accuracy Evaluated on a
4. Breaking of Transactions processing of 95.6% single dataset,
Camouflage on Pattern Computer accuracy lower
[4] Analysis and vision Deep in real world
Machine learning scenarios.
Intelligence MoCA
(TPAMI) in dataset
2023 used.
5. FSNet: Focus IEEE FSNet COCO- FSNet is
Scanning Conference on COCO- Camouflag e computationall y
Network for Computer Camouflage mAP of 57.5% expensive to
Camouflaged Vision and Wild train and deploy
Object Pattern Wild Camouflage
Detection[5] Recognition Camouflage mAP of 73.2%
(CVPR) in dataset used.
2023.
16
6. Boundary- IEEE BGNet Wild Camouflage BGNet can fail to
guided Conference on Wild : mAP of 75.2% detect
Camouflaged Computer Vision Camoufl ChameleonCamou camouflaged
Object and Pattern age flage objects in
Detection[6] Recognition Chamele (Chameleon): challenging
(CVPR) in 2022. on mAP of 82.4% scenarios, such as
Camoufl when the objects
age are very small or
dataset occluded.
used.
Detecting Proceedings of the Frequenc The proposed Sensitivity to
7. Camouflaged IEEE/CVF y method Image Distortions,
Object in Conference on Enhance outperforms other Limited
Frequency Computer Vision ment state-of-the-art Resolution
Domain[7] and Pattern Module methods by a
Recognition (FEM) . large margin on
(CVPR), 2022, CHAME three widely-used
LEON,, COD datasets
C AMO-
test,CO
D10-
Test
dataset
8. Concealed IEEE SINet, SINet obtains the Adaptability of
Object Transactions on COD10 best performance Camouflage,
Detection[8] pattern analysis K Limited Training
and machine dataset Data
intelligence used.
,2022
9. Camouflaged IEEE PyTorch, C2F -Net obtains Computational
Object transactions on C2F -Net better Complexity,
Detection via circuits and model, performances Sensitivity to
context-awar system for video COD10 across all the Hyperparamete r
e Cross-level technology K metrics
fusion[9] ,2022 dataset
used.
10. Camouflaged IEEE PyTorch, Average Precision Computational
Object Conference on Deep (AP) at IoU=0.75: cost,Limited
Segmentation Computer Vision learning, 73.04% applicability
with and Pattern COD10
Distraction Recognition K
Mining[10] (CVPR) in 2021
17
2.2 KEY GAPS IN THE LITERATURE
1. Absence of publicly accessible datasets:
There aren't many large-scale, diversified, and well-annotated databases of disguised items
that are available to the public. This complicates the process of creating and assessing novel
algorithms for the detection of disguised objects.
2. Limited study on real-world scenarios:
The majority of studies on the identification of camouflaged objects have been conducted in
well controlled lab environments. Further investigation is required into the detection of
camouflaged objects in real-world settings, such woods and battlefields.
3. Difficulties with cross-domain adaptation:
Depending on their surroundings, camouflaged objects can have drastically different
appearances. This poses a challenge to the development of generalizable algorithms for
camouflaged item recognition in new domains.
4. Little study on adversarial assaults:
Studies on adversarial attacks against algorithms for detecting disguised objects are scarce.
Adversarial attacks have the potential to mislead algorithms for detecting concealed objects,
which makes this a crucial field of study.
5. The need for more effective algorithms:
The computing cost of techniques for detecting hidden objects can be high. Because of this,
using them in real-time applications is challenging. More effective methods for the detection
of disguised objects are required.
18
CHAPTER 03: SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
3.1 REQUIREMENTS AND ANALYSIS
3.1.1 FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS:
1. Image or video loading and Preprocessing:
Load images from specified paths and resize them to half of their original size for consistent
input to the models.
2. Model Loading:
Load the models for object detection.
3. Model Evaluation and Prediction:
Set the models to evaluation mode and preprocess input images for making
predictions. Obtain predictions using our models.
4. Result Visualization:
Extract relevant information (class labels, probabilities, bounding box coordinates) from
model predictions. Visualize the predicted bounding boxes on the original images. Adjust the
threshold for prediction. Save the resulting images with annotated bounding boxes.
5. Cleaning Up:
Delete variables to free up memory after processing and visualization.
3.1.2 NON-FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS:
1. Performance:
The code should demonstrate reasonable performance in terms of execution time and
responsiveness, especially during image loading, model inference, and result visualization.
19
2. Usability:
The code should be clear and well-documented to facilitate ease of use and
understanding for developers and users.
3. Scalability:
The code should be scalable to handle different image sizes and datasets.
4. Maintainability:
The code should be designed and documented in a way that facilitates ease of maintenance,
allowing for future updates or modifications.
5. Reliability:
The code should reliably load pre-trained models, make accurate predictions, and handle
different image scenarios.
6. Resource Efficiency:
The code should use computational resources efficiently, avoiding unnecessary memory
consumption or processing overhead.
7. Portability:
The code, designed for a Colab environment, should be portable to other environments with
minimal modification.
8. Security:
The code should not pose security risks, especially when handling external images or
processing user inputs.
9. Robustness:
The code should handle various types of images and scenarios robustly, without crashing or
producing unreliable results.
10. Interpretability:
The code should provide clear and interpretable visualizations of the object detection results
for users to understand.
20
3.2 PROJECT DESIGN AND ARCHITECTURE
Figure 3.1 Data flow Diagram (R-CNN)
Figure 3.2 Data flow Diagram(YOLO)
21
1. Data Collection and Preparation:
Collect a dataset of videos relevant to camouflage object detection.
Data Collection: Gather a diverse set of videos representing various scenarios where
camouflaged objects might be present. Ensure a balance in the dataset to avoid biases.
2. Data Preprocessing:
Resize to a consistent input size. Normalize pixel values to ensure consistent input across
images.
Image Resizing: Preprocess images to ensure a consistent input size for model training and
inference. Resize images to dimensions compatible with the input requirements of the chosen
models.
3. Model Training:
Utilize models and fine-tune models on the dataset.
Dataset Integration: Integrate the dataset into the model training pipeline. Ensure
compatibility between the dataset structure and the input requirements of the models. Transfer
Learning:
Fine-tune the models on the custom dataset to adapt them to camouflaged object detection.
Monitor training progress and adjust hyperparameters as needed.
4. Model Evaluation:
Evaluate the models on a separate test set. Measure performance using appropriate metrics.
5. Result Visualization:
Visualize model predictions on sample images and videos.
6. Prediction Extraction:
Extract model predictions, including class labels, probabilities, and bounding box coordinates.
22
METHODOLOGY:
Figure 3.3 R-CNN Architecture
1. R-CNN
The architecture of R-CNN (Region-based Convolutional Neural Network) consists of three
main stages:
Stage 1: Area Concept
Image input: The selective search algorithm receives the image input.
Selective Search: This algorithm divides the picture into superpixels and then combines them
into broader areas.
Region Proposals: Probably containing objects, the algorithm produces a list of region
proposals.
Stage 2: Extracting Features:
Convolutional Neural Network (CNN): A CNN that has been previously trained processes
each region proposal.
Feature Vectors: For every area suggestion, the CNN retrieves feature vectors. Feature Maps:
A feature map is created from the feature vector organization.
Stage 3: Bounding box regression and classification:
Classification: A support vector machine (SVM) classifier is used to process the feature
vectors. Object Scores: For every object class, the SVM classifier produces a probability
score.
23
Bounding Box Regression: A bounding box regression network is run across the feature
vectors. Bounding Box Refinements: Correction vectors for the bounding boxes are output
by the bounding box regression network.
Final Bounding Boxes: The bounding boxes are refined using the correction vectors.
2. FASTER R-CNN:
A two-stage object detection technique called Faster R-CNN expands on the R-CNN
architecture. By proposing a region proposal network (RPN) that effectively creates high-
quality proposals straight from the convolutional neural network's (CNN) feature maps, it
solves the poor pace of R-CNN.
Stage 1: Region Proposal Network (RPN)
Shared Convolutional Features: A CNN is used to extract feature maps from the input image.
RPN Layers: Two distinct RPN layers get the feature maps.
Objectness Score Layer: Forecasts the presence or absence of an object in each location.
Bounding Box Regression Layer: Provides each region's bounding box correction vectors.
Region Proposals: To provide top-notch region proposals, bounding box regression vectors
and objectness scores are employed.
Stage 2: Identifying Objects and Extracting Features
ROI Pooling: RoI pooling is used to warp the region suggestions to a predetermined size.
Feature extraction involves running the twisted regions through a fully connected (FC) layer
in order to retrieve the feature vectors.
Classification: Two branches process the feature vectors:
Branch for Class Prediction: Forecasts the class label for every area. Bounding Box
Refinement Branch: Provides bounding box correction vectors.
Bounding Box Refinement: The region proposals' bounding boxes are fine-tuned by
applying the correction vectors to them.
3. YOLO-NAS:
You Only Look Once Neural Architecture Search is referred to as YOLO-NAS. Neural
architecture search (NAS) approaches are included in an expansion of the YOLO (You Only
Look Once) object identification framework to automatically find the best neural network
24
architecture for the YOLO model. YOLO-NAS combines the YOLO object detection
framework with neural architecture search techniques to automatically discover an optimal
architecture for YOLO models. Instead of using a fixed architecture (e.g., YOLOv3,
YOLOv4), YOLO-NAS searches for the best architecture for a given dataset and task,
potentially leading to improved performance and efficiency.
Figure 3.4 YOLO-NAS Architecture
3.3 DATA PREPARATION
In this project, we used images to train and apply state-of-the-art object detection models,
namely Faster R-CNN and R-CNN, for the challenging task of detecting camouflaged objects.
The custom dataset, meticulously curated with diverse images capturing various
environmental scenarios, was annotated with bounding boxes outlining camouflaged objects.
Through a fine-tuning process, adjustments were made to optimize the models for the
detection of camouflaged objects. The training process involved careful consideration of
hyperparameters and a thorough evaluation of a distinct test set.
The original Moving Camouflaged Animals (MoCA) Dataset includes 37K frames from 141
YouTube Video sequences with a resolution and sampling rate of 720 × 1280 and 24fps in
the majority of cases. The dataset covers 67 types of animals moving in natural scenes, but
25
some are not camouflaged animals. Also, the ground truth of the original dataset is bounding
boxes rather than dense segmentation masks, which makes it hard to evaluate the VCOD
segmentation performance.
3.4 IMPLEMENTATION
Figure 3.5 Importing libraries
26
Figure 3.6 Loading faster R-CNN Model
Figure 3.7 Define Functions for Prediction
27
Figure 3.8 Define Functions for Drawing Box
Figure 3.9 Define COCO Instance Category Names
28
Figure 3.10 Load and Display an Image
Figure 3.11 Transform the Image
29
Figure 3.12 Making Predictions
Figure 3.13 Extract and Display Bounding Boxes
30
Figure 3.14 Draw Bounding Boxes with detection
31
32
Figure 3.15 Use R-CNN for Mask Prediction
33
Figure 3.16 Detection using yolo-nas
34
Figure 3.17 Output Video
35
3.5 KEY CHALLENGES
There are several difficulties in implementing camouflage object recognition, which is
understandable given the complexities involved in detecting items with fuzzy borders and
complicated backgrounds. Among the main difficulties encountered in this project are:
1. Small Object Detection:
The fact that camouflaged items blend in with the background can cause them to be partially
covered or appear smaller.
It's possible that YOLO-NAS isn't as good at spotting small objects as it is at spotting larger
ones, which causes it to miss things that are disguised.
2. Motion Blur Complexity:
Motion blur may further obfuscate concealed objects in film sequences.
Even though YOLO-NAS can handle some motion blur, it may struggle with a really strong
blur, which makes object detection even more difficult.
3. Annotation Complexity of Data:
Challenge: Due to the subjective nature of camouflage and the difficulty of accurately
defining object borders, annotating camouflaged objects in photos is inherently challenging.
Mitigation: To guarantee consistent and correct annotations, a rigorous set of annotation
criteria is put into place, accompanied by iterative reviews and quality control procedures.
Working together with domain experts and annotators helps address the subjective nature of
camouflage.
4. Overfitting with Particular Experiences:
Problem: When learning to identify items particular to a given context in the training dataset,
models may overfit and find it difficult to generalize to a variety of real-world circumstances.
Mitigation: A variety of origins and environmental circumstances are included in the dataset
through diversification. The model's generalization abilities are assessed using methods like
cross-validation and comprehensive testing on a variety of datasets.
36
5. Enhancing Detection Limits:
Challenge: It's important to choose the right confidence threshold for detection; if you choose
incorrectly, you risk missing detections or getting more false positives.
Mitigation: Carefully weighing the trade-off between recall and precision, extensive testing
is done with various threshold levels. Evaluation measures that help choose the best threshold
for the intended application are precision-recall curves.
6. Needs for Computational Resources:
Challenge: Deep neural networks, such as R-CNN and Faster R-CNN, can be computationally
hard and resource-intensive to train and tune.
Mitigation: The computational load is lessened by making use of parallel processing and cloud
computing resources. Model performance and computational requirements are balanced
through the use of effective model architectures and optimization strategies.
A comprehensive strategy combining sophisticated model architectures, meticulous dataset
curation, deliberate annotation procedures, and ongoing refinement based on empirical
findings is needed to address these issues. To tackle these challenges, deep learning
techniques [6] have been adopted and shown great potential.
37
CHAPTER 04: TESTING
4.1 TESTING STRATEGY
1. Evaluation of pretrained Models:
Goal: Evaluate the effectiveness of the selected models in the particular camouflaged item
identification test.
Testing Procedures: Assess models on a specific test set of items that have been concealed.
Examine how different confidence levels affect the model's performance.
2. Testing for Dataset Diversity:
Goal: Evaluate how well the models generalize to different contexts and backgrounds.
Testing Procedures: Fill the test set with pictures that have different textures,
backgrounds, and lighting.
Play with real-world obstacles like partial visibility and occlusions. Test models in various
environments to make sure they are robust.
3. Testing the Interpretability of the Model:
Goal: Recognize the areas of the picture that contribute to the model's predictions. Steps in the
Testing Process: Confirm that the models recognize objects that are hidden by focusing on
relevant locations.
4. Data Augmentation
Apply data augmentation techniques (e.g., rotation, scaling, flipping) during training and
assess how well the models generalize to variations in input data.
5. Robustness Testing:
Evaluate the models' robustness to variations in lighting conditions, background
clutter, and other environmental factors that may affect camouflage detection.
6. Adversarial Testing:
Test the models against adversarial examples to assess their robustness against intentional
manipulations designed to deceive the model.
38
4.1.1 TOOLS USED
1. PyTorch
PyTorch[8] is a deep learning framework used for building and training neural networks. Your
code utilizes PyTorch to load a pre-trained Faster R-CNN model and make predictions.
2. Colorama:
Colorama is a Python package that adds colored output to the terminal. Your code uses it for
printing colored text.
3. OpenCV (cv2)
OpenCV is a computer vision library used for image processing and computer vision tasks.
Your code uses OpenCV to draw rectangles, text, and manipulate images.
4. NumPy:
NumPy is a library for numerical operations in Python. Your code uses NumPy for array
manipulation, particularly in converting images
5. PIL (Pillow):
PIL (Python Imaging Library) is used for opening, manipulating, and saving many
different image file formats. The code uses it to open images.
6. Matplotlib:
Matplotlib is a plotting library for creating static, animated, and interactive visualizations
in Python. Your code uses it for visualizing images.
7. Torchvision:
Torchvision is a package in PyTorch containing several tools for computer vision
tasks. It provides pre-trained models, datasets, and image transformations.
39
4.2 TEST CASES AND OUTCOMES
Using R-CNN and Faster RCNN :
Step 1: Input Image:
Figure 4.1 Input Image
Step 2: Creating bounding box:
Figure 4.2 Bounding Box
40
Step 3: Detection of camouflaged object:
Figure 4.3 Detection of camouflaged object
Detection using Yolo-Nas for moving animals :
Step 1: Input Video:
Figure 4.4 Input Video
41
Step 2: Output Video:
Figure 4.5 Detection of camouflaged object
42
CHAPTER 5: RESULTS AND EVALUATION
5.1 RESULTS:
The image processing and R-CNN model prediction were executed on the provided image,
'camo7 .jpg'. The following steps were performed:
1. Image Loading and Display:
The image was loaded using the PIL library and displayed using Matplotlib.
2. Transformations and R-CNN Prediction:
The image underwent the necessary transformations for compatibility with the R-CNN model.
The Faster R-CNN model made predictions on the image.
3. Bounding Box Extraction:
Bounding boxes, labels, and scores were extracted from the Faster R-CNN predictions.
4. Drawing Bounding Boxes:
Bounding boxes were drawn on the image based on the predicted labels and scores. The image
with bounding boxes was displayed.
Figure 5.1 Output Image
43
The YOLO-NAS model was executed on the input video. The following steps were
performed:
1. Video Loading and Display:
The video was loaded and displayed using the Open CV Initialize the video capture object
to read frames from the input video file.
2. Initialize Video Capture:
Initialize the video capture object to read frames from the input video file.
3. Object Detection Loop:
Frame from the video capture object was read and object detection was implemented using the
YOLO-NAS model on the frame to detect objects and their bounding boxes then bounding
boxes around detected objects on the frame were drawn.
4. Display or save results:
Display the annotated frame with detected objects.
Figure 5.2 Output Video
44
CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSION AND FUTURE SCOPE
6.1 CONCLUSION
To sum up, the subject of Camouflage Object Detection is a difficult and demanding one in
the field of computer vision. The capacity to precisely detect items that are smoothly
incorporated into their environment has important ramifications for a variety of fields, such
as security applications, biodiversity monitoring, and military surveillance. Using
sophisticated models like Faster R-CNN and R-CNN in particular provides a strong basis for
tackling this problem.
Ensuring the effectiveness and dependability of the models has been contingent upon the
adoption of a comprehensive testing approach throughout the project. Pretrained
models—like R-CNN and Faster R-CNN—have been used to extract information from
large datasets, which has improved generalization and accelerated convergence during fine-
tuning. The testing approach has covered a wide range of topics, such as user acceptance
testing, diversity testing, threshold sensitivity analysis, fine-tuning validation, model
evaluation, and continuous integration.
Pretrained models demonstrated promising results when evaluated on a specific test set,
indicating their potential for accurate detection of disguised objects. These models were
further fine-tuned for the unique characteristics of the dataset, exhibiting greater convergence
and adaptability throughout training. The models demonstrated robustness and the capacity to
manage real-world difficulties by demonstrating resilience against a variety of scenarios and
environmental circumstances.
The best confidence thresholds were found by threshold sensitivity analysis, which made it
possible to carefully balance recall and precision in accordance with project needs. User
acceptance testing ensures that end users find the solution to be clear and suitable for their
needs, offering important insights into the models' practical usability.
By automating monotonous chores and guaranteeing uniform evaluation in response to code
45
changes, the incorporation of continuous integration tools expedited the testing process.
Model interpretability testing improved our knowledge of the regions impacting model
predictions, and performance metrics visualization made it easier to understand and make
decisions.
To sum up, the research study titled "Camouflage Object Detection" has shown
encouraging outcomes and a solid testing plan. But to further improve the model's
performance and tackle the challenges of camouflaged object recognition, continual
improvements in computer vision techniques, user feedback, and real-world deployment
scenarios will need to drive constant refining and iteration.
Key Findings:
Using the COD10K benchmark dataset, our project's main objective was to compare the
effectiveness of R-CNN and Faster R-CNN for camouflage object detection. We found that
both algorithms are rather good at detecting objects that are disguised, however Faster R-CNN
is faster and more accurate than R-CNN. This advantage comes from the Region Proposal
Network (RPN) of Faster R-CNN, which effectively produces object suggestions and lightens
the computational load on the later stages. Both techniques are still affected by the
background's complexity and the caliber of the training set, though.
1. Effectiveness of Deep Learning Algorithms: Deep learning algorithms, particularly R-
CNN and Faster R-CNN, have shown notable capabilities in identifying camouflaged objects.
Their ability to extract high-level features from images makes them well-suited for this task.
2. Superiority of Faster R-CNN: Faster R-CNN surpasses R-CNN in terms of speed and
accuracy, making it more practical for real-time applications. Its Region Proposal Network
(RPN) efficiently generates object proposals, reducing computational burden.
3. Sensitivity to Background Complexity: The performance of both R-CNN and Faster R-
CNN is sensitive to the complexity of the background. Complex backgrounds with high
clutter and varying textures can hinder detection accuracy.
46
4. Occlusion and Deformation Challenges: Completely occluded objects and objects with
significant deformation pose challenges for these algorithms. Detecting such objects requires
more sophisticated techniques.
5. Impact of Training Data Quality: The quality of the training data significantly impacts
the performance of camouflage object detection algorithms. Data should adequately represent
the diversity of real-world camouflage patterns and background textures.
6. Computational Complexity Considerations: Deep learning algorithms can be
computationally expensive, especially when processing high-resolution images or videos.
This can limit their real-time applicability in resource-constrained environments.
7. Domain-Specific Knowledge Integration: Incorporating domain-specific knowledge
about camouflage patterns, object characteristics, and potential environments can enhance the
effectiveness of detection algorithms.
8. Emergence of Adversarial Camouflage: Adversarial camouflage techniques, designed to
fool object detection algorithms, pose a new challenge. Algorithms need to be robust against
these techniques.
Limitations:
Both R-CNN and Faster R-CNN can be severely hampered by complex backgrounds and
clutter, which can result in incorrect object boundaries or missing detections. Furthermore,
these algorithms encounter difficulties when items are fully obscured by other objects.
Moreover, both approaches have difficulty precisely defining the boundaries of the item,
particularly in cases when the object's shape is complex or it blends in with the background.
1. Complexity and Computation Cost:
Complexity and Computation Cost: Because YOLO-NAS explores a vast search space, the
architecture search process can be both time-consuming and computationally costly. Its
applicability in resource-constrained contexts or real-time applications may be hampered by
its complexity.
47
2. Training Data Requirements:
YOLO-NAS requires a large and diverse dataset for effective architecture search and training.
Insufficient or biased training data may lead to suboptimal model performance or overfitting.
3. Hyperparameter Sensitivity:
Elements like learning rate, batch size, and optimization techniques have an impact on how
well YOLO-NAS performs. Inadequate hyperparameter configurations may have an impact
on the model's generalization and convergence.
4. Computational Complexity:
Deep learning algorithms, while powerful, can be computationally expensive, especially when
processing high-resolution images or videos. This can limit their real-time applicability in
resource-constrained environments.
5. Domain-Specific Knowledge Gap:
Effectively detecting camouflaged objects often requires domain-specific knowledge about
the type of camouflage, the object's characteristics, and the potential environment. Integrating
such knowledge into detection algorithms can enhance their performance.
6. Adversarial Camouflage:
The development of adversarial camouflage techniques, designed specifically to fool object
detection algorithms, poses a new challenge. These techniques involve manipulating the
object's appearance to make it less distinguishable from the background.
Contributions to the Field:
Our effort has offered a comprehensive comparison between R-CNN and YOLO model which
has made a significant contribution to the field of camouflage object detection. We paved the
door for more study and advancement in this field by demonstrating the efficacy of deep
learning algorithms in this field. Our results also brought to light the difficulties in detecting
objects in camouflage, which has led academics to investigate new approaches to overcome
these constraints.
48
6.2 FUTURE SCOPE
There is a great deal of promise and room for growth in the subject of camouflage object
detection in the future. The following are some particular fields where more study and
innovation can result in important advancements:
1. Better Representation and Extraction of Features:
Improving the ability of the algorithm to discriminate between items that are concealed and
their surroundings requires the development of more robust and sophisticated feature
extraction and representation techniques. It could be necessary to look into methods like edge
detection, texture analysis, and multi-scale feature analysis to extract more discriminative
features.
2. Integration of Domain-Specific Knowledge:
The detection algorithms' capacity to manage the intricate characteristics of backdrop textures
and camouflage patterns can be significantly enhanced by the addition of domain-specific
knowledge. This can mean guiding the detection process with pre-existing knowledge of
object morphologies, ambient conditions, and camouflage design principles.
3. Multimodal Data Integration:
Adding new modalities, such depth or infrared imagery, can provide a more complete image
of the situation and perhaps improve detection accuracy. This may include using depth data
to identify objects from their surroundings or using thermal photography to locate objects
hidden in a variety of temperatures.
4. Instantaneous Detection in Changing Environments:
For usage in robotics, environmental monitoring, and security surveillance, real-time
algorithms for camouflage object detection must be created. This will require enhancing the
algorithms' computational efficiency and researching techniques like object tracking and
recurrent neural networks in order to handle dynamic scenarios.
49
5. Modular Detection Techniques:
Increasing the algorithms' ability to adjust to different camouflage patterns and environments
is necessary to increase their wide applicability. One way to do this might be to develop
adaptive detection methods that can recognize the distinctive features of each scene and adjust
their parameters accordingly.
6. Resistance to Deformation:
It's critical to create algorithms for real-world applications that can identify things that are
disguised even in situations where they are twisted or partially obscured. This may require
looking into techniques like occlusion reasoning, background context modeling, and shape
deformation analysis to handle these problems.
6.3 APPLICATIONS
1. Military Applications[11]:
Camouflage detection is a crucial task in military applications, as it allows soldiers to identify
and track enemy positions and movements. Camouflaged objects can be difficult to detect
using traditional methods, as they blend in with their surroundings. However, camouflaged
object detection algorithms, such as those based on R-CNN, can be used to effectively detect
camouflaged objects in images and videos.
2. Medical Applications[12]:
In medical imaging, camouflaged lesions can be difficult to detect due to their subtle
appearance and similarity to surrounding tissues. This can lead to missed diagnoses and
delayed treatment. Camouflaged object detection algorithms can be used to detect
camouflaged lesions in medical images, such as tumors and cancerous cells, with high
accuracy.
3. Environmental Monitoring [13]:
Camouflaged animals can be difficult to detect in natural environments due to their ability to
50
blend in with their surroundings. This can make it difficult to study animal populations and
assess the impact of human activities on the environment. Camouflaged object detection
algorithms can be used to detect camouflaged animals in images and videos, such as
endangered species and invasive species, with high accuracy.
4. Autonomous Vehicles [14]:
Autonomous vehicles need to be able to detect and avoid obstacles in their path, including
camouflaged objects. Camouflaged object detection algorithms can be used to help
autonomous vehicles detect camouflaged objects with high accuracy, even when the objects
are partially obscured or blend in with their surroundings.
5. Robotics [15] :
Robots need to be able to detect and manipulate objects in their environment, including
camouflaged objects. Camouflaged object detection algorithms can be used to help robots
detect camouflaged objects with high accuracy, even when the objects are partially obscured
or blend in with their surroundings.
6. Agriculture:
In agriculture, camouflaged pests and diseases can cause significant damage to crops.
Camouflaged object detection algorithms can be used to detect camouflaged pests and
diseases in fields and orchards with high accuracy, even when the objects are partially
obscured or blend in with their surroundings.
51
REFERENCES
[1] John Skelhorn and Candy Rowe. “Cognition and the evolution of camouflage”.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 283, 1825 (2016), 20152890.
[2] Zhennan Chen, Rongrong Gao, Tian-Zhu Xiang, and Fan Lin. “Diffusion Model for
Camouflaged Object Detection”. In ECAI. IOS Press, 2023.
[3] Deng-Ping Fan, Ge-Peng Ji, Ming-Ming Cheng, and Ling Shao. “Concealed Object
Detection”. IEEE TPAMI 44, 10 (2022), 6024–6042 , 2022.
[4] Melia G Nafus, Jennifer M Germano, Jeanette A Perry, Brian D Todd, Allyson Walsh,
and Ronald R Swaisgood. “Hiding in plain sight: a study on camouflage and habitat selection
in a slow-moving desert herbivore”. Behavioral Ecology 26, 5 (2015), 1389–1394 , 2015.
[5] H. Bi, C. Zhang, K. Wang, J. Tong and F. Zheng, "Rethinking camouflaged object
detection: Models and datasets", IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., Nov. 2021.
[6] Tang, P., Gao, H., Liu, Y., & Xu, C. “Camouflaged object detection with region-based
convolutional neural networks”. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision
and Pattern Recognition (pp.
6717-6726), 2019.
[7] Li, X., Zou, Z., Tang, J., & Wang, H. (2020). “Camouflage detection using Faster R-CNN
with multi-scale features and attention mechanism”. IEEE Transactions on Image
Processing, 29(7), 1993-2006.
[8] D.-P. Fan, G.-P. Ji, G. Sun, M.-M. Cheng, J. Shen and L. Shao, "Camouflaged object
detection", Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), pp. 2777-2787,
Jun. 2020.
[9] M. Zhuge, X. Lu, Y. Guo, Z. Cai and S. Chen, "CubeNet: X-shape connection for
camouflaged object detection", Pattern Recognition., vol. 127, Jul. 2022.
[10] A. Paszke et al., "PyTorch: An imperative style high-performance deep learning
52
library", Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 32, pp. 1-15, 2019.
[11] Li, X., Zou, Z., Tang, J., & Wang, H. “Camouflage detection using Faster R-CNN with
multi-scale features and attention mechanism”. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,
29(7), 1993-2006, 2016.
[12] Zhang, J., & Ma, J. “Camouflaged lesion detection in medical images using Faster R-
CNN”. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 65(12), 2733-2741, 2018.
[13] Z., Zhou, Y., & Wang, Y. “Camouflaged animal detection in natural videos using Faster
R-CNN with temporal context information”. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for
Video Technology, 31(3), 921-933, 2021.
[14] Chen, X., Ma, H., Wang, J., & Li, W. “Camouflaged object detection for autonomous
vehicles based on Faster R-CNN and saliency map”. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent
Transportation Systems, 21(10),
3476-3487, 2020.
[15] X., Wang, J., & Ma, H. “Camouflaged object detection for robotic object manipulation
using Faster R-CNN and contextual information”. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and
Automation, 35(10),
2368-2380,2019.
[16] Dong, D., Pei, J., Gao, R., Xiang, T.Z., Wang, S. and Xiong. “A Unified Query-
based Paradigm for Camouflaged Instance Segmentation”. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.07392.,
2023.
[17] Cong, R., Sun, M., Zhang, S., Zhou, X., Zhang, W. and Zhao, Y., “Frequency
Perception Network for Camouflaged Object Detection”. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.08924
,2023
[18] Huang, Zhou, et al. "Feature shrinkage pyramid for camouflaged object detection
with transformers." Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and
Pattern Recognition. 2023.
53
[19] Lamdouar, H., Xie, W. and Zisserman, A., “The Making and Breaking of
Camouflage.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.03899 , 2023
[20] Song, Ze, et al. "FSNet: Focus Scanning Network for Camouflaged Object Detection."
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing (2023).
[21] Sun, Y., Wang, S., Chen, C. and Xiang, T.Z.,. Boundary-guided camouflaged object
detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.00794 , 2022
[22] Zhong, Y., Li, B., Tang, L., Kuang, S., Wu, S. and Ding, S., “Detecting camouflaged
object in frequency domain”. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer
Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 4504-4513), 2022.
[23] Fan, D.P., Ji, G.P., Cheng, M.M. and Shao, L., “Concealed object detection”. IEEE
transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 44(10), pp.6024-6042,2022.
[24] Chen, G., Liu, S.J., Sun, Y.J., Ji, G.P., Wu, Y.F. and Zhou, T.,. “Camouflaged object
detection via context-aware cross-level fusion”. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems
for Video Technology, 32(10), pp.6981-6993 , 2022.
[25] Mei, H., Ji, G.P., Wei, Z., Yang, X., Wei, X. and Fan, D.P.,. “Camouflaged object
segmentation with distraction mining”. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 8772-8781) , 2021.
54
APPENDIX
Code:
Step -1 Installing and importing libraries:
!pip install -q
condacolab
import
condacolab
condacolab.inst
all()
!conda update -n base -c defaults conda
!conda install -c pytorch pytorch
!conda install -c pytorch
torchvision import torch
from torch
import no_grad
import requests
import cv2
import
numpy as
np from
PIL import
Image
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from torchvision.models.detection import fasterrcnn_resnet50_fpn, keypointrcnn_resnet50_fpn
Installs and imports necessary libraries including CondaColab, PyTorch, and other image
processing libraries.
Step 2: Loading Faster R-CNN Model
faster_rcnn_model =
55
fasterrcnn_resnet50_fpn(pretrained=True)
faster_rcnn_model.eval()
Loads a pre-trained Faster R-CNN model using ResNet-50 backbone and sets it to evaluation
mode.
Step 3: Disabling Gradient Computation
for name, param in faster_rcnn_model.named_parameters():
param.requires_grad = False
Disables gradient computation for all parameters in the Faster R-CNN model.
Step 4: Define Functions for Prediction and Drawing Boxes
def get_predictions(pred, threshold=0.8, objects=None):
predicted_classes= [(COCO_INSTANCE_CATEGORY_NAMES[i],p,[(box[0], box[1]),
(box[2], box[3])]) for i,p,box in
zip(list(pred[0]['labels'].numpy()),pred[0]['scores'].detach().numpy(),list(pred[0]['boxes'].detach()
.numpy()))]
predicted_classes=[ stuff for stuff in predicted_classes if stuff[1]>threshold ]
if objects and predicted_classes :
predicted_classes=[ (name, p, box) for name, p, box in predicted_classes if name
in objects ] return predicted_classes
def draw_box(pred_class, img, rect_th=2, text_size=0.5, text_th=2, download_image=False,
img_name="img"):
image = (np.clip(cv2.cvtColor(np.clip(img.numpy().transpose((1, 2, 0)), 0, 1),
cv2.COLOR_RGB2BGR),
0, 1) * 255).astype(np.uint8).copy()
for predicted_class in
pred_class: label =
predicted_class[0]
probability =
56
predicted_class[1] box =
predicted_class[2]
t, l, r, b = [round(x) for x in box[0] + box[1]]
print(f"\nLabel: {label}")
print(f"Box coordinates: {t}, {l},
{r}, {b}") print(f"Probability:
{probability}")
cv2.rectangle(image, (t, l), (r, b), (0, 255, 0), rect_th)
cv2.rectangle(image, (t, l), (t + 110, l + 17), (255, 255, 255), -1)
cv2.putText(image, label, (t + 10, l + 12),
cv2.FONT_HERSHEY_SIMPLEX,
text_size, (0, 255, 0), thickness=text_th)
cv2.putText(image, label + ": " + str(round(probability,
2)),
(t + 10, l + 12), cv2.FONT_HERSHEY_SIMPLEX, text_size,
(0, 255, 0), thickness=text_th)
image =
p.array(image)
plt.figure(figsi
ze=(15, 10))
plt.imshow(cv2.cvtColor(image,
cv2.COLOR_BGR2RGB)) if download_image:
plt.savefig(f'{img_nam
e}.png') else:
plt.show()
Step 5: Define COCO Instance Category Names
COCO_INSTANCE_CATEGORY_NAMES = [
57
' background ', 'person', 'bicycle', 'car', 'motorcycle',
'airplane', 'bus', 'train', 'truck', 'boat', 'traffic light', 'fire
hydrant', 'N/A', 'stop sign',
'parking meter', 'bench', 'bird', 'cat', 'dog', 'horse', 'sheep', 'cow',
'elephant', 'bear', 'zebra', 'giraffe', 'N/A', 'backpack', 'umbrella', 'N/A', 'N/A',
'handbag', 'tie', 'suitcase', 'frisbee', 'skis', 'snowboard', 'sports ball',
'kite', 'baseball bat', 'baseball glove', 'skateboard', 'surfboard',
'tennis racket', 'bottle', 'N/A', 'wine glass', 'cup', 'fork', 'knife',
'spoon', 'bowl',
'banana', 'apple', 'sandwich', 'orange', 'broccoli', 'carrot', 'hot dog', 'pizza',
'donut', 'cake', 'chair', 'couch', 'potted plant', 'bed', 'N/A', 'dining table',
'N/A', 'N/A', 'toilet', 'N/A', 'tv', 'laptop', 'mouse', 'remote', 'keyboard', 'cell
phone', 'microwave', 'oven', 'toaster', 'sink', 'refrigerator', 'N/A', 'book',
'clock', 'vase', 'scissors', 'teddy bear', 'hair drier', 'toothbrush'
] len(COCO_INSTANCE_CATEGORY_NAMES)
Defines the COCO instance category names used by the model.
Step 6: Load and Display an Image
img_path = '/content/images/camo7.jpg'
image = Image.open(img_path)
image.resize([int(half * s) for s in
image.size]) plt.imshow(image)
plt.show()
Loads an image and displays it using Matplotlib.
Step 7: Transform the Image and Make Predictions
transform =
transforms.Compose([transforms.ToTensor()])
img = transform(image)
pred = faster_rcnn_model([img])
58
Step 8: Extract and Display Bounding Boxes
boxes =
pred[0]['bo
xes'] labels
=
pred[0]['la
bels']
scores =
pred[0]['sc
ores']
index =
labels[0].it
em()
COCO_INSTANCE_CATEGORY_NAMES[index]
bounding_box = boxes[0].tolist()
t, l, r, b = [round(x) for x in bounding_box]
Extracts bounding boxes, labels, and scores from the predictions and displays the bounding box
on the image.
Step 9: Draw Bounding Boxes with Text
img_plot = (np.clip(cv2.cvtColor(...), 0, 1) *
255).astype(np.uint8) cv2.rectangle(img_plot, (t, l), (r,
b), (0, 255, 0), 10) plt.imshow(cv2.cvtColor(img_plot,
cv2.COLOR_BGR2RGB)) plt.show()
Draws bounding boxes on the image and displays the result.
Step 10: Install Colorama
!pip install colorama
59
Step 11: Use R-CNN for Mask Prediction
rcnn_model =
torchvision.models.detection.maskrcnn_resnet50_fpn(pretrained=True)
rcnn_model.eval()
rcnn_pred = rcnn_model([img])
Loads and uses a Mask R-CNN model for mask prediction.
Step 12: Draw Bounding Boxes for R-CNN Predictions
image_with_boxes = draw_box(image, rcnn_pred[0]['boxes'], rcnn_pred[0]['labels'],
rcnn_pred[0]['scores']) plt.imshow(image_with_boxes)
plt.axis('off')
plt.showw()
60
report
ORIGINALITY REPORT
14 %
SIMILARITY INDEX
10%
INTERNET SOURCES
13%
PUBLICATIONS
%
STUDENT PAPERS
PRIMARY SOURCES
1
www.catalyzex.com
Internet Source 1%
2
www.arxiv-vanity.com
Internet Source 1%
3
arxiv.org
Internet Source 1%
4
Zhou Huang, Hang Dai, Tian-Zhu Xiang, Shuo
Wang, Huai-Xin Chen, Jie Qin, Huan Xiong.
1%
"Feature Shrinkage Pyramid for Camouflaged
Object Detection with Transformers", 2023
IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and
Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2023
Publication
5
openaccess.thecvf.com
Internet Source 1%
6
www.scilit.net
Internet Source 1%
7
discovery.researcher.life
Internet Source <1 %
You might also like
- Program Book For Community Internship (YOGA AWARENESS)0% (1)Program Book For Community Internship (YOGA AWARENESS)26 pages
- Cyber Security Analyst Interview Questions and AnswersNo ratings yetCyber Security Analyst Interview Questions and Answers11 pages
- Group Number - 2 - MOVING OBJECT DETECTION USING YOLO Algorithm - KaustavNo ratings yetGroup Number - 2 - MOVING OBJECT DETECTION USING YOLO Algorithm - Kaustav44 pages
- Innovative System For Vehicle Detection and CountingNo ratings yetInnovative System For Vehicle Detection and Counting54 pages
- Visvesvaraya Technological University: "Virtual Traffic Police Automatic Helmet Detection and Number Plate Recognition"No ratings yetVisvesvaraya Technological University: "Virtual Traffic Police Automatic Helmet Detection and Number Plate Recognition"57 pages
- Group Number - 2 - MOVING OBJECT DETECTION USING YOLO AlgorithmNo ratings yetGroup Number - 2 - MOVING OBJECT DETECTION USING YOLO Algorithm40 pages
- TICOM Vol. - 3 Supreme Command Sigint AgencyNo ratings yetTICOM Vol. - 3 Supreme Command Sigint Agency136 pages
- Management of Computer Projects - Lecture 1No ratings yetManagement of Computer Projects - Lecture 18 pages
- Introduction To Object Modeling (1) - 065316No ratings yetIntroduction To Object Modeling (1) - 06531699 pages
- Third Party Data Breach and A Recent IncidentNo ratings yetThird Party Data Breach and A Recent Incident2 pages
- CS - 3340 - LEARNING - JOURNAL - UNIT - 1.docx Sy'No ratings yetCS - 3340 - LEARNING - JOURNAL - UNIT - 1.docx Sy'3 pages
- Bitdefender-GravityZone Small Business Security DatasheetNo ratings yetBitdefender-GravityZone Small Business Security Datasheet2 pages
- JavaScript Design Patterns: Deliver fast and efficient production-grade JavaScript applications at scaleFrom EverandJavaScript Design Patterns: Deliver fast and efficient production-grade JavaScript applications at scaleNo ratings yet
- Drone Development from Concept to Flight: Design, assemble, and discover the applications of unmanned aerial vehiclesFrom EverandDrone Development from Concept to Flight: Design, assemble, and discover the applications of unmanned aerial vehiclesNo ratings yet
- Recent Developments in Artificial Intelligence and Communication TechnologiesFrom EverandRecent Developments in Artificial Intelligence and Communication TechnologiesNo ratings yet
- Mastering ServiceStack: Utilize ServiceStack as the rock solid foundation of your distributed systemFrom EverandMastering ServiceStack: Utilize ServiceStack as the rock solid foundation of your distributed systemNo ratings yet
- PowerShell for Penetration Testing: Explore the capabilities of PowerShell for pentesters across multiple platformsFrom EverandPowerShell for Penetration Testing: Explore the capabilities of PowerShell for pentesters across multiple platformsNo ratings yet
- Video Data Analytics for Smart City Applications: Methods and TrendsFrom EverandVideo Data Analytics for Smart City Applications: Methods and TrendsNo ratings yet
- Hardware Description Language Demystified: Explore Digital System Design Using Verilog HDL and VLSI Design ToolsFrom EverandHardware Description Language Demystified: Explore Digital System Design Using Verilog HDL and VLSI Design ToolsNo ratings yet
- AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner: Study Guide with Practice Questions and LabsFrom EverandAWS Certified Cloud Practitioner: Study Guide with Practice Questions and Labs5/5 (1)
- Python for Cybersecurity Cookbook: 80+ practical recipes for detecting, defending, and responding to Cyber threats (English Edition)From EverandPython for Cybersecurity Cookbook: 80+ practical recipes for detecting, defending, and responding to Cyber threats (English Edition)No ratings yet
- Intelligent Reliability Analysis Using MATLAB and AI: Perform Failure Analysis and Reliability Engineering using MATLAB and Artificial Intelligence (English Edition)From EverandIntelligent Reliability Analysis Using MATLAB and AI: Perform Failure Analysis and Reliability Engineering using MATLAB and Artificial Intelligence (English Edition)No ratings yet
- Cloud Computing: Master the Concepts, Architecture and Applications with Real-world examples and Case studiesFrom EverandCloud Computing: Master the Concepts, Architecture and Applications with Real-world examples and Case studiesNo ratings yet
- Advanced Penetration Testing with Kali Linux: Unlocking industry-oriented VAPT tactics (English Edition)From EverandAdvanced Penetration Testing with Kali Linux: Unlocking industry-oriented VAPT tactics (English Edition)No ratings yet
- Microprocessor and Microcontroller Interview Questions: A complete question bank with real-time examplesFrom EverandMicroprocessor and Microcontroller Interview Questions: A complete question bank with real-time examplesNo ratings yet
