Project title
Project title
English Centre
The project life cycle is a systematic framework commonly employed to depict the distinct
phases of a project from initiation to completion (William, 1996). This approach, developed by
the Project Management Institute, is crucial as it offers a structured guide for project managers to
navigate each stage of the project, ensuring that all essential steps are followed to achieve
successful outcomes. There are five key stages: Initiation, Planning, Execution, Monitoring and
Closure.
1. Initiation
At this phase, the involved activities are defining the objectives, organising resources and
determining the scope of the project. The project manager will have a broader perspective of the
upcoming tasks in the researching process (Kerzner, 2018). The impact of the initiation phase is
considerable because it sets the foundation for what the project aims to achieve, as well as
aligns stakeholders' expectations and ensures that the project goals are well understood and
agreed upon (Siriram, 2022)
As a project manager developing a project management plan, this phase is where I need to
research and deepen my understanding of AI, along with how it's applied in various business
activities. This foundational knowledge will be essential for successfully executing the project.
Next, I must establish clear goals for the project to guide my decisions and ensure I stay on track.
The objectives I’ve set (outlined in section 1.3) will also help me determine the necessary
resources, including both human and financial resources, to meet the project's needs.
2. Planning
After obtaining a project overview, a more detailed plan is developed. This phase involves
breaking down each work item into smaller, specific tasks. Common elements include assessing
resource availability, budgeting, defining milestones, setting deadlines, and establishing a
stakeholder communication strategy. Risk assessment and mitigation strategies are incorporated
to address potential challenges that may arise during the next phase of the project — execution.
This detailed planning phase serves as a roadmap for the project, ensuring all aspects are
considered and accounted for before implementation begins (Pinto & Slevin, 1988).
At this stage, I need a detailed plan. I will create a work breakdown structure (WBS) and Gantt
chart to clearly visualise the tasks and avoid confusion during the implementation process.
Developing a cost estimate table, setting quality evaluation criteria, and establishing a risk
control strategy are crucial to keep the project on track. To aid my planning process, I'll consider
key questions such as:
These questions will help refine my approach and ensure a comprehensive planning process.
3. Execution
The execution phase in the project life cycle is where the project plan is put into action, and the
project team works to deliver the project's objectives (William, 1996). During this phase, all
tasks and activities outlined in the planning stage are carried out to produce the project's intended
outcomes, transforming theoretical plans into tangible results (Kerzner, 2002). Effective
coordination of resources and team members is essential to ensure that the project proceeds
according to schedule and within the allocated budget (Kendrick, 2013).
I will need to continuously update information about the business activity that applies AI to the
process (in this case, the application of AI in teaching and class management). This ensures no
important information is missed while minimising the risk of incorrect or missing data. The goal
is to maintain the quality of the project output — recommendations for the chosen business and
other businesses involved in similar operations. At this stage, I will conduct interviews with
representatives of tED English Centre to update information about their AI application activities
in the teaching process. This is also the time to distribute the questionnaire to project
stakeholders (in this case they are tED’s students) to collect information and data, which will
then inform the development of the stakeholder communication plan.
4. Monitoring
The main tasks in this phase include: tracking progress, performance assessment, issue
identification and adjustments and corrective actions. Regularly monitoring project milestones
and deliverables is essential to verify that they are being met as intended. Continuous evaluation
ensures the project remains on track to achieve its goals, while also identifying any deviations
from the plan. By spotting potential problems early, proactive management can be employed to
address issues before they escalate into major challenges. Based on the monitoring data,
necessary adjustments can be implemented to keep the project aligned with its objectives and
ensure successful outcomes (Mithileni, 2022).
In publicising and distributing the questionnaire to stakeholders, it is easy to encounter risks such
as applicants intentionally providing false information or the group of subjects filling out the
questionnaire is not representative enough for a group of stakeholders, leading to biassed survey
results. The same applies to conducting in-depth interviews, where the interviewee may decline
to provide additional information or choose to discontinue cooperation unilaterally. Therefore, I
need to closely monitor during this stage to be able to recognize risks and find solutions as soon
as possible. I can also provide solutions to deal with impossible or unexpected situations to
increase the flexibility of my problem-solving process through continuous monitoring,
evaluation and feedback.
5. Closure
This is the final stage of the project life cycle and also the end of project activities. At this stage,
it is necessary to ensure that all aspects of the project are completed, documented, and
communicated effectively to stakeholders. Key activities include delivering final outputs to
stakeholders, documenting relevant information such as project objectives and lessons learned,
and conducting a comprehensive evaluation of the project's performance against its initial goals
(Wilson, 2014).
Upon reaching the final stage of the project, following the completion of all four preceding
phases, I will deliver the project’s outcomes to tED English Centre. These deliverables consist of
actionable recommendations that can be implemented to finalise their product. Additionally, I
will compare the project results with the initial objectives and assess the extent to which the
project goals have been achieved.
Furthermore, I will reflect on the new insights and lessons gained throughout the project and
provide a comprehensive evaluation of the entire process. This stage also presents an opportunity
to leverage the research findings as a foundation for future projects, contributing to continued
development and improvement.
2. Company introduction
tED is an English centre established in late 2022, providing basic English courses and IELTS
preparation courses at each level. Teaching and management activities are carried out online
through two main platforms: Google meet and Google classroom. Due to the high calibre of the
courses offered and the efficacy of promotional efforts on social media platforms, there has been
a notable surge in student enrollment, consequently resulting in substantial revenue growth.
Nevertheless, accompanying this issue is the overload of business management and operation
when existing online platforms (Google meet & Google classroom) reach their limitations in
meeting business requirements and ensuring customer contentment due to the predominant
reliance on human intervention. Consequently, despite tED being a modest enterprise, its board
of directors has opted to create software incorporating artificial intelligence to bolster business
functions.
As of the current date (October 8, 2024), the development of this AI-infused software is nearing
completion and is preparing to enter the testing phase. At this stage, the management board
begins to question the extent to which artificial intelligence will be integrated into business
operations and the degree to which human involvement will be preserved. This project
management plan aims to delve further into the AI initiatives undertaken by the company,
offering insights into its implementation strategies, while also exploring potential solutions or
recommendations to enhance the operations of tED.
Determine the functions of AI to the organisation in specific and the foreign language
educational businesses as a whole
Recommendations for tED English Centre and other businesses engaged in similar
activities
Data collection & analysis finished (using both qualitative and 26/11/2024 2/12/2024
quantitative method)
Finalise and submission finished 6/12/2024 7/12/2024
+ Clear interview
objectives: Develop a
detailed interview
guide outlining the key
topics, questions, and
objectives for each
interview.
+ Structured
interview process:
Implement a structured
format for the
interview, ensuring
that all necessary data
is gathered while
allowing flexibility for
open-ended responses
+ Clear interview
objectives: Develop a
detailed interview
guide outlining the key
topics, questions, and
objectives for each
interview.
+ Structured
interview process:
Implement a structured
format for the
interview, ensuring
that all necessary data
is gathered while
allowing flexibility for
open-ended responses
+ It is essential to
achieve the minimum
required number of
responses within the
predetermined time
frame. Avoid
extending the deadline,
as this could impact
the overall progress of
the project.
Given the different types of data to be collected, I will employ both quantitative and qualitative
methods. However, the primary approach will be qualitative, as tED is a relatively new and small
business. Conducting in-depth interviews will provide more comprehensive and detailed insights.
A survey will also be administered to tED’s students to gather quantitative data and represent
this stakeholder group. Afterward, I will follow up with in-depth interviews with selected
students to further refine the data, ensuring greater depth and accuracy
1. Quantitative method, its functions in gathering data and its importance to a project
The quantitative method is a systematic approach to data collection and analysis that focuses on
numerical and measurable data. In gathering data, it employs tools such as surveys, experiments,
questionnaires, and statistical records to generate quantifiable information (Nardi, 2018). The
function of this method is to provide objective, precise, and reproducible results, allowing project
managers to identify patterns, trends, and relationships between variables. By using statistical
techniques, it enables the analysis of large datasets, supporting conclusions that can be
generalised to broader populations (Curran & Hussong, 2009).
One effective quantitative technique is distributing questionnaires to gather data from a specific
target group. This method enables the efficient collection of standardized information across a
large sample, facilitating clear comparisons and robust statistical analysis. Questionnaires offer
several advantages as a data collection method. They are cost-effective, efficient for gathering
information from large groups, and provide standardized responses, which simplifies comparison
and analysis (Taherdoost, 2021). However, questionnaires often lack depth, may result in low
response rates, and can be misinterpreted by respondents. They also lack the flexibility to ask
follow-up questions and may be prone to response bias, where participants give socially
desirable answers rather than truthful ones.
This method is especially useful in projects where concrete metrics are needed to measure
performance, assess risks, or validate outcomes.
2. Qualitative method, its functions in gathering data and its importance to a project
The qualitative method is a research approach that focuses on understanding phenomena through
the exploration of non-numerical data, such as experiences, behaviours, and perceptions. Its
primary function in gathering data is to provide in-depth insights into the underlying reasons,
motivations, and context behind people's actions and decisions (Wright & Wright, 2016). This
method uses techniques like interviews, focus groups, observations, and case studies to collect
rich, detailed information. Unlike quantitative methods, which rely on numerical data, qualitative
methods aim to capture the complexity of human experience and are particularly useful for
exploring new or complex issues. The data collected through this method helps in identifying
patterns, themes, and deeper meanings, making it valuable in situations where the goal is to
understand the "why" and "how" behind behaviours and decisions (Hennink, Hutter & Bailey,
2020).
In addition to quantitative method, this project will primarily focus on qualitative research
methods. Key techniques include conducting in-depth interviews to gather detailed insights from
participants, and closely monitoring the integration of AI into the teaching process over a defined
period. By observing the application of AI in educational process and class management, this
project aims to capture the nuances of its impact on both instructors and students.
8. PMP Evaluation
I will analyze and evaluate the factors of PMP in achieving the project objectives initially stated.
9. Appendix
Details about start and finish date of Gantt Chart
William, R. D., (1996), “A guide to the project management body of knowledge”, pp. 11-13
Kerzner, H., (2018), “Project management best practices: Achieving global excellence”, John
Wiley & Sons.
Pinto, J. K. & Slevin, D. P., (1988), “Critical success factors across the project life cycle:
definitions and measurement techniques”, Project Management Journal, 19(3), pp. 67-75
Kerzner, H., (2002), “Strategic planning for project management using a project management
maturity model”, John Wiley & Sons.
Kendrick, T., (2013), “The project management tool kit: 100 tips and techniques for getting the
job done right”, HarperChristian+ ORM.
Mithileni, S. A., (2022), “Exploring the project management monitoring and control process in
the ‘Working for Water Programme’”, Doctoral dissertation, North-West University (South
Africa).
Wilson, R., (2014), “A comprehensive guide to project management schedule and cost control:
methods and models for managing the project lifecycle”, Pearson Education.
Rea, L. M. and Parker, R. A., (2014), “Designing and conducting survey research: A
comprehensive guide”, John Wiley & Sons.
Fosnacht, K., Sarraf, S., Howe, E. and Peck, L.K., (2017), “How important are high response
rates for college surveys?”, The Review of Higher Education, 40(2), pp.245-265.
Davis, K., (2016), “A method to measure success dimensions relating to individual stakeholder
groups”, International Journal of Project Management, 34(3), pp.480-493.
Nardi, P. M., (2018), “Doing survey research: A guide to quantitative methods”, Routledge.
Curran, P. J. and Hussong, A. M., (2009), “Integrative data analysis: the simultaneous analysis of
multiple data sets”, Psychological methods, 14(2), p.81.
Taherdoost, H., (2021) “Data collection methods and tools for research; a step-by-step guide to
choose data collection technique for academic and business research projects”. International
Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM), 10(1), pp.10-38.
Wright, L. T. and Wright, R., (2016), “Qualitative research. In The Marketing Book, pp. 191-
210, Routledge.
Hennink, M., Hutter, I. and Bailey, A., (2020), “Qualitative research methods”, Sage.