Econdev - Midterm Reviewer
Econdev - Midterm Reviewer
3. 7 Negatives
– Lower Y per head
– Poor people bear the burden of population growth
– Large population limits educational opportunities
– The health of women is harmed
– Family food is limited
– Environmental degradation occurs
– Illegal international migration and
over-urbanization 2.2 The Malthusian Model
– Malthus predicted that natural population growth
1.2 Population Growth Isn’t A Problem! would inevitably outpace agricultural output,
Growth And Poverty 1. Other Issues resulting in famine and other catastrophes until the
– Rapid growth is bad for the poor because they – Underdevelopment population was reduced below a sustainable level.
would be bypassed and marginalized by the – Resource Depletion and Environmental
structural changes of modern growth. Destruction
– Population Distribution
Policy Options On Income Inequality And – Subordination of Women
Poverty: Some Basic Considerations
1. Altering the functional distribution of income 2. False Issue.
through relative factor prices – Neocolonial dependence theory
2. Modifying the size distribution through increasing
assets of the poor 3. Desirable
3. Progressive income and wealth taxes – Consumer Demand
4. Direct transfer payments and the public – Economies of Scale
provisions of goods and service – Labor Supply (sufficient-low cost)
– Non-economic reasons
Lesson 6: Population Growth and Economic Criticisms of Malthus’ model
Development: Causes, Consequences, and – the theory only addressed population issues
Controversies related to his home country of England. the theory
1.1 Population Growth Is A Problem! was rooted in racist ideologies related to England's
1. Population and the Global Crisis imperialist foreign policy. Malthus failed to anticipate
– Poverty, low levels of living, malnutrition, ill health, the development of new technologies that would
environmental degradation, etc. decrease food insecurity.
2. Population-poverty cycles
2.3 The Household Model
– Gary Becker's fertility theory holds that with higher
income people would purchase more children,
people behave as they would in purchasing
consumer durables. However, higher-income groups
frequently have fewer children. Becker says that
higher-income families want high-quality children
who are more expensive.