Scribd
Upload
27 views2 pages

Final Defense Rubrics

The document outlines the research rubrics for the final oral defense at Darwin International School, detailing evaluation criteria across various sections including Introduction, Literature Review, Research Design, Results, Conclusion, and References. Each section contains specific indicators rated on a scale from 1 to 5, assessing the quality and relevance of the research output. Additionally, it includes a section for overall remarks regarding the research's acceptance status.

Uploaded by

d1deleon.viancafelicia
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
27 views2 pages

Final Defense Rubrics

The document outlines the research rubrics for the final oral defense at Darwin International School, detailing evaluation criteria across various sections including Introduction, Literature Review, Research Design, Results, Conclusion, and References. Each section contains specific indicators rated on a scale from 1 to 5, assessing the quality and relevance of the research output. Additionally, it includes a section for overall remarks regarding the research's acceptance status.

Uploaded by

d1deleon.viancafelicia
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

FINAL DEFENSE RUBRICS

Darwin International School - Pulong Buhangin

RESEARCH RUBRICS FOR FINAL ORAL DEFENSE


Title of the Study:
Researcher:

Research Adviser:
Date of Completion:

Directions: Analyze the research output based on the following criteria below. Check the
appropriate column (5 as the highest and 1 as the lowest) indicating your evaluation.

INTRODUCTION

Indicators 5 4 3 2 1
1. The introduction consists of an adequate introductory discussion of the problem.
2. Factors that led to the problem are well-discussed.
3. The in-text citations are properly and clearly presented.

LITERATURE REVIEW AND CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

Indicators 5 4 3 2 1
1. Cited literature and studies are recent (5-10 yrs up to the present year), adequate, and
relevant to the research problem.
2. Synthesis of the reviewed literature and studies is well-organized, concise (not too long
nor too short) and is based on the researchers’ logical analysis of the cited materials.
3. The sources of the cited li t e r a t u r e and studies are appropriately acknowledged
and/or credited.
4. The framework presented conceptualizes the concepts of the theory appropriately.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHOD

Indicators 5 4 3 2 1
1. The research methodology is well-described and is suitable or fitting to the research problem
including the procedure and techniques of gathering data.
2. The research design and method employed by the researchers are correct and relevant to the
fulfillment of the accurate results of the study.
3. The statistical tools elected ar e appropriate to gather the needed data and answer the
problem of the study.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

Indicators 5 4 3 2 1
1. Tables and figures are scholarly presented.
2. Analysis and interpretation of datasets are accruate and well-written.
3. For quantitative, statistical results are analyzed correctly. For qualitative, proper analysis is
employed.
4. The way the results are presented addressed the gap of the study or the title of their
research.

CONCLUSION

Indicators 5 4 3 2 1
1. Conclusion is well-written and follows parsimony.
2. Conclusion is drawn appropriately from the findings of the study through a generalization.
3. The conclusion capsulates the entire research endeavors and answers the aims of the study.
FINAL DEFENSE RUBRICS
Darwin International School - Pulong Buhangin

REFERENCES

Indicators 5 4 3 2 1
1. The references cited in the manuscript are complete.
2. The referencing follows an APA format.
3. It follows an alphabetical order; and follows accurately and correctly the format in referencing
all authors (bold, italics, etc.)

Overall Total: __________________________

REMARKS

Passed without revision

Failed ______ with minor revision

_______ with major revision

_______ rejected

Name and Signature of Panel:

Date:

Noted by:
Thesis Adviser

You might also like