100% found this document useful (1 vote)
169 views5 pages

Survey It Expert

The document is a questionnaire designed for IT experts to evaluate the software quality of 'EmpowerHer: Revolutionizing Students’ Health Care Through Technology' based on ISO 25010 standards. It includes sections for respondent information, software quality evaluation across various characteristics such as functional suitability, performance efficiency, usability, reliability, security, maintainability, and portability, along with a feedback section for comments and suggestions. The evaluation uses a five-point scale for respondents to rate different aspects of the software.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
169 views5 pages

Survey It Expert

The document is a questionnaire designed for IT experts to evaluate the software quality of 'EmpowerHer: Revolutionizing Students’ Health Care Through Technology' based on ISO 25010 standards. It includes sections for respondent information, software quality evaluation across various characteristics such as functional suitability, performance efficiency, usability, reliability, security, maintainability, and portability, along with a feedback section for comments and suggestions. The evaluation uses a five-point scale for respondents to rate different aspects of the software.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Questionnaire for IT Expert

PART 1: RESPONDENT’S PROFILE


Name: _________________________________________________________________
Position/Designation: _____________________________________________________
PART 2: SOFTWARE QUALITY EVALUATION
Directions: Please evaluate the software quality of the “EmpowerHer: Revolutionizing
Students’ Health Care Through Technology” based on the eight main characteristics of ISO
25010 Software Product Quality Standards. Choose on the appropriate box using the five-point
scale with its corresponding verbal descriptions (5 as the highest and 1 as the lowest).

Functional Suitability - represents the degree to which a product or system provides functions
that meet stated and implied needs when used under specified conditions
Questions 5 4 3 2 1
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
Agree Disagree
Functional completeness -
Degree to which the set of
functions covers all the
specified tasks and user
objectives.
Functional correctness -
Degree to which a product or
system provides the correct
results with the needed degree
of precision.
Functional appropriateness –
Degree to which the functions
facilitate the accomplishment
of specified tasks and
objectives.

Performance Efficiency - represents the performance relative to the amount of resources used
under stated conditions.
Questions 5 4 3 2 1
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
Agree Disagree
Time behaviour - Degree to
which the response and
processing times and
throughput rates of a product
or system, when performing
its functions, meet
requirements.
Resource utilization - Degree
to which the amounts and
types of resources used by the
system, when performing its
functions, meet requirements.
Capacity - Degree to which
the maximum limits of the
system parameter meet
requirements.
Usability - Degree to which a product or system can be used by specified users to achieve
specified goals with effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction in a specified context of use.

Questions 5 4 3 2 1
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
Agree Disagree
Appropriateness
recognizability - Degree to
which users can recognize
whether a system is
appropriate for their needs.
Learnability - Degree to
which a system can be used
by specified users to achieve
specified goals of learning to
use the system with
effectiveness, efficiency,
freedom from risk and
satisfaction in a specified
context of use.
Operability - Degree to which
a system has attributes that
make it easy to operate and
control.
User error protection - Degree
to which a system protects
users against making errors.
User interface aesthetics -
Degree to which a user
interface enables pleasing and
satisfying interaction for the
user.
Accessibility - Degree to
which a system can be used
by people with the widest
range of characteristics and
capabilities to achieve a
specified goal in a specified
context of use.

Reliability - Degree to which a system, product or component performs specified functions


under
specified conditions for a specified period of time.
Questions 5 4 3 2 1
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
Agree Disagree
Maturity - Degree to which a
system or component meets
needs for reliability under
normal operation
Availability - Degree to which
a system or component is
operational and accessible
when required for use.
Fault tolerance - Degree to which a
system or component operates as
intended despite the presence of
hardware or software faults.
Recoverability - Degree to
which, in the event of an
interruption or a failure or
system can recover the data
directly affected and re-
establish the desired state of
the system

Security - Degree to which a product or system protects information and data so that persons or
other products or systems have the degree of data access appropriate to their types and levels of
authorization.

Questions 5 4 3 2 1
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
Agree Disagree
Confidentiality - Degree to
which a system ensures that
data are accessible only to
those authorized to have
access.
Integrity - Degree to which a
system component prevents
unauthorized access to, or
modification of, computer
programs or data.
Non-repudiation - Degree to
which actions or events can
be proven to have taken
place so that the events or
actions cannot be repudiated
later.
Accountability - Degree to
which the actions of an entity
can be traced uniquely to the
entity.
Authenticity - Degree to
which the identity of a subject
or resource can be proved to
be the one claimed.

Maintainability - This characteristic represents the degree of effectiveness and efficiency with
which a product or system can be modified to improve it, correct it or adapt it to changes in
environment, and in requirements.
Questions 5 4 3 2 1
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
Agree Disagree
Modularity - Degree to
which a system or computer
program is composed of
discrete components such
that a change to one
component has minimal
impact on other components
Reusability - Degree to
which an asset can be used
in more than one system, or
in building other assets.
Analysability - Degree of
effectiveness and efficiency
with which it is possible to
assess the impact on a product
or system of an intended
change to one or more of its
parts, or to diagnose a product
for deficiencies or causes of
failures, or to identify parts
to be modified.
Modifiability - Degree to
which a product or system
can be effectively and
efficiently modified without
introducing defects or
degrading existing product
quality
Testability - Degree of
effectiveness and efficiency
with which test criteria can
be established for a system,
product or component and
tests can be performed to
determine whether those
criteria have been met.

Portability - Degree of effectiveness and efficiency with which a system, product or component
can be transferred from one hardware, software or other operational or usage environment to
another.
Questions 5 4 3 2 1
Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
Agree Disagree
Adaptability - Degree to
which a product or system
can effectively and efficiently
be adapted for different or
evolving hardware, software
or other operational or usage
environments
Installability - Degree of
effectiveness and efficiency
with which a product or
system can be successfully
installed and/or uninstalled in
a specified environment.
Replaceability - Degree to
which a product can replace
another specified software
product for the same purpose
in the same environment.
PART 4: FEEDBACK AND SUGGESTIONS
Please provide further comments about your experience in EmpowerHer: Revolutionizing
Students’ Health Care Through Technology. Kindly identify its Strong point/s to be enhanced
and its weak points that need to be addressed for improvements.

_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________

Do you have any thoughts on other Features/Functions that can be added to EmpowerHer:
Revolutionizing Students’ Health Care Through Technology? Kindly share any suggestions
with us so we can better improve it.

_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________

Respondent’s Signature: ___________________________


Date of Evaluation: _______________________

You might also like