PMOB Notes-Unit-2
PMOB Notes-Unit-2
Topics:
2.1 Definition & Principles of Organization
2.2 Organization Chart & its types
(a) Line Organization Structure
(b) Line & Staff Organization
(c) Functional Organization Structure
(d) Committee Organization Structure
(e) Matrix Organization Structure
(f) Virtual Organization Structure
(g) Cellular Organization &
(h) Team structure
(i) Boundaryless organization
(j) Inverted Pyramid structure
(k) Lean and Flat Organization structure
PMOB: UNIT-2 P a g e 1 | 21
4. Principle of Authority and Responsibility: –
• The authority flows downstream in the line. Everyone is empowered to complete
the work. Although authority can be delegated, the responsibility rests with the
man who has been assigned the job.
• If a superior delegates his authority to his subordinate, the superior is not deprived
of his responsibility, although the subordinate becomes liable to his superior. No
further responsibility can be assigned.
5. Principle of Definition: –
• The scope of authority and responsibility should be clearly defined. Everyone
should know their work with certainty.
• If duties are not explicitly assigned, it will not be possible to fix the responsibility
as well.
• Everyone will not be responsible. The relationships between different
departments should also be clearly defined to make the work efficient and smooth.
6. Span of Control: –
• The span of control means how many subordinates can be supervised by an
observer. The number of subordinates should be such that the supervisor is able
to control his work effectively.
• In addition, the work should be supervised in the same nature. If the span of
control is proportion less, it is bound to affect the efficiency of workers due to slow
communication with supervisors.
7. Principle of Balance: –
• The principle means that the assignment of work should be such that each person
is given only the work that he can perform well.
• If one person is over worked and the other person is under worked then the work
will suffer in both the situations. The work should be divided in such a way that
everyone is able to give their maximum.
8. Principle of Continuity: –
• The organization should be modified according to the changing circumstances.
• Every day there are changes in the methods of production and marketing systems.
• The organization should be dynamic and not static. There should always be a
possibility to make the necessary adjustments.
9. Principle of Uniformity: –
• The organization should provide for the delivery of work in such a way so that
uniformity remains.
• Each officer should be in charge of their respective area so that dual subordination
and conflicts can be avoided.
10. Principle of Unity of Command: –
• There should be unity of command in the organization. A person should be
accountable to only one boss.
PMOB: UNIT-2 P a g e 2 | 21
• If a person is in control of more than one person, there is confusion and conflict.
The person will get conflicting orders from various superiors.
• This principle creates a sense of responsibility towards a person.
• The command should be from top to bottom to make the organization sound and
clear.
• It also leads to consistency in directing, coordination and control.
PMOB: UNIT-2 P a g e 3 | 21
management team. They can be broad-based, depicting the overall company or
department or unit-specific.
Most org charts are structured by using the "hierarchical" model, which shows
management or other high-ranking officials on top, and lower-level employees beneath
them. Other types of charts include the flat org chart, the matrix chart, and the divisional
org chart. Organization structure can be seen in mechanistic and organic model. The
mechanistic organizational structure uses a top-down approach to management, while
organic organizational structure uses a more flexible management style.
Mechanistic Organization Structures:
Mechanistic organizations have centralized decision making and formal, standardized
control systems. Essentially, they are bureaucracies. Mechanistic organizations work well
in stable, simple environments. Managers integrate the activities of clearly defined
departments through formal channels and in formal meetings. Often, they feature many
hierarchical layers and a focus on reporting relationships. Example
Organic Organizations:
An organic structure. There are four segments that all communicate with one another.
Each segment has 3 to 5 individuals who all communicate with one another. Organic
organizations have a low degree of formality, specialization and standardization. Their
decision making is decentralized and their activities are well-integrated. The organic
model is usually flat, and it usually uses cross-hierarchical and cross-functional teams and
possesses a comprehensive information network that features lateral and upward
communication in addition to downward communication. Example:
PMOB: UNIT-2 P a g e 4 | 21
Various Types of Organization Structures:
Organizations are structured to ensure smooth workflow and efficient management. Two
fundamental types of organizational structures are Line Organization and Line & Staff
Organization.
(a) Line Organization
Line organization is the simplest form of organization where authority flows from the top
management to the lowest level in a direct line.
Features:
• Clear hierarchy and chain of command.
• Authority moves vertically from top to bottom.
• Each department operates independently.
• Simple and easy to understand.
Merits:
✅ Simplicity – Easy to establish and manage.
✅ Quick Decision-Making – Authority is well-defined.
✅ Accountability – Responsibility is fixed at every level.
✅ Cost-Effective – No additional staff required.
Limitations:
❌ Overburdened Managers – One person has to handle multiple tasks.
❌ Lack of Specialization – Managers may not have expertise in all areas.
❌ Rigidity – No flexibility for adapting to changes.
❌ Poor Coordination – Departments may work in silos.
Example:
• Military organizations where commands flow from the General to Soldiers.
• Small businesses with direct control from the owner to workers.
PMOB: UNIT-2 P a g e 5 | 21
(b) Line & Staff Organization
A Line & Staff Organization is a structure where staff specialists assist line managers in
decision-making, but authority remains with the line managers.
Features:
• Combination of direct authority (Line) and advisory role (Staff).
• Line managers make operational decisions.
• Staff managers provide expert advice (e.g., HR, Finance, IT).
• Increases efficiency by adding specialized knowledge.
Merits:
✅ Expertise-Based Decisions – Staff specialists improve decision quality.
✅ Flexibility – Organizations can adapt to changing needs.
✅ Reduced Workload – Line managers get advisory support.
✅ Improved Coordination – Better teamwork between departments.
Limitations:
❌ Conflicts Between Line and Staff – Line managers may ignore staff advice.
❌ High Cost – Additional staff specialists increase expenses.
❌ Delayed Decision-Making – Too many inputs may slow down processes.
❌ Confusion in Authority – Unclear roles can lead to miscommunication.
PMOB: UNIT-2 P a g e 6 | 21
Features:
1. Departmentalization – The organization is divided into different functions, each
managed by experts.
2. Hierarchy-Based Reporting – Employees report to the department heads who
specialize in their respective fields.
3. Specialization – Workers and managers focus on their specific expertise,
increasing efficiency.
4. Clear Chain of Command – Well-defined roles and responsibilities within each
function.
5. Scalability – Suitable for large organizations where specialized knowledge is
needed.
Merits:
✅ Efficiency and Expertise – Employees become highly skilled due to specialization.
✅ Clear Career Growth – Employees can advance within their respective functions.
✅ Operational Clarity – Well-defined roles and responsibilities streamline decision-
making.
✅ Better Coordination within Departments – Since all employees in a function share
similar skills, communication is effective.
Demerits:
❌ Lack of Interdepartmental Coordination – Different departments may focus only on
their goals, leading to silos.
❌ Slow Decision-Making – Since functional heads must coordinate, decision-making can
be slow.
❌ Limited Flexibility – Employees are confined to their specialized roles, which may
limit overall adaptability.
❌ Conflict of Interest – Departments may compete for resources rather than working
collaboratively.
Example:
A manufacturing company may have the following functional departments:
• Production Department – Oversees manufacturing and quality control.
• Marketing Department – Handles product promotion and sales.
• Finance Department – Manages budgeting and financial reporting.
• Human Resource Department – Looks after hiring, employee benefits, and
compliance.
Each department is led by a functional manager, ensuring that operations run smoothly
within their expertise.
PMOB: UNIT-2 P a g e 7 | 21
(d) Committee Organization Structure
A Committee Organization Structure is a management system where decisions and
responsibilities are shared among a group of individuals instead of being assigned to a
single person. This structure is used in organizations to bring diverse expertise together
for better decision-making.
Features:
1. Group Decision-Making – Decisions are made collectively by a committee rather
than a single authority.
2. Specialization – Different members contribute their expertise to solve complex
problems.
3. Accountability – Responsibility is distributed among committee members,
reducing individual risk.
4. Consensus-Based Approach – Decisions are taken after discussions and agreement
among members.
5. Formal or Informal – Committees can be permanent (standing committees) or
temporary (ad-hoc committees) based on organizational needs.
Merits:
✅ Diverse Perspectives – Brings together multiple viewpoints, leading to well-informed
decisions.
✅ Improved Decision-Making – Reduces bias as multiple members evaluate a problem.
✅ Encourages Teamwork – Promotes collaboration among different departments.
✅ Reduces Workload – Work is shared among committee members, reducing pressure
on individuals.
✅ Enhances Transparency – Decisions are documented, ensuring clarity and
accountability.
Limitations:
❌ Slow Decision-Making – Discussions and approvals take longer than in hierarchical
structures.
❌ Conflicts & Disagreements – Differences in opinions may lead to delays or ineffective
PMOB: UNIT-2 P a g e 8 | 21
decisions.
❌ Lack of Accountability – Since decisions are made collectively, individual
responsibility is sometimes unclear.
❌ Higher Costs – Meetings and discussions require time and resources.
❌ Dominance of Few Members – Strong personalities or senior members might
influence decisions unfairly.
Examples: Board of Directors in a Company
• A corporation’s Board of Directors is a classic example of a committee structure.
• The board includes members from different backgrounds like finance, marketing,
and operations.
• They collectively make key strategic decisions regarding the company’s future,
financial investments, and policies.
Other Examples:
• University Committees (Academic Council, Exam Board)
• Government Committees (Legislative Committees)
• Non-Profit Organizations (Fundraising and Strategy Committees)
Features:
1. Dual Authority – Employees report to both a functional manager and a project
manager.
2. Flexibility – Resources and personnel can be allocated dynamically based on
project needs.
3. Interdisciplinary Collaboration – Employees from different departments work
together.
PMOB: UNIT-2 P a g e 9 | 21
4. Efficient Resource Utilization – Resources are shared across projects to optimize
efficiency.
5. Temporary or Permanent Structure – The matrix can be used for temporary
projects or long-term objectives.
Merits:
✅ Efficient Use of Resources – Skilled employees are shared across multiple projects,
reducing redundancy.
✅ Enhanced Communication – Encourages coordination between departments, leading
to better problem-solving.
✅ Flexible and Adaptable – Quick response to changing market demands and project
requirements.
✅ Encourages Skill Development – Employees gain experience working with multiple
teams and managers.
✅ Improved Decision-Making – Brings together diverse expertise to make well-
informed decisions.
Limitations:
❌ Confusion in Reporting – Dual authority can lead to conflicts between managers.
❌ Complexity – Requires strong coordination and clear communication to function
effectively.
❌ Power Struggles – Managers may compete for control over resources and personnel.
❌ Higher Costs – Maintaining dual reporting systems and coordination requires
additional administrative effort.
❌ Employee Stress – Employees may face excessive workload and conflicting
instructions from different managers.
PMOB: UNIT-2 P a g e 10 | 21
(f) Virtual Organization Structure
A Virtual Organization Structure is a modern, flexible business model where a company
operates without a physical office or with minimal physical presence, relying on digital
communication and collaboration tools to function. It is formed by a network of
independent entities (companies, freelancers, remote employees) that work together to
achieve common goals.
Features:
1. Decentralized Operations – No centralized office; teams work from different
locations.
2. Heavy Reliance on Technology – Uses digital tools like cloud computing, video
conferencing, and project management software.
3. Flexible Workforce – Employees can be full-time, part-time, freelancers, or
contractors.
4. Cost-Effective – Reduces office space, utilities, and operational costs.
5. Global Talent Pool – Companies can hire skilled professionals from anywhere in
the world.
6. Focus on Core Competencies – Non-essential tasks are often outsourced to third-
party vendors.
Merits:
✅ Lower Operational Costs – Saves expenses on office rent, utilities, and infrastructure.
✅ Access to Global Talent – Companies can hire skilled workers from different regions.
✅ Increased Flexibility – Employees have the freedom to work remotely and maintain
work-life balance.
✅ Faster Decision-Making – Digital communication tools enable quick collaboration and
decision-making.
✅ Scalability – Easy to expand or contract business operations based on market
demand.
PMOB: UNIT-2 P a g e 11 | 21
✅ Eco-Friendly – Reduces carbon footprint by minimizing travel and office space
requirements.
Limitations:
❌ Lack of Face-to-Face Interaction – Reduced in-person communication can impact
teamwork and company culture.
❌ Security Concerns – Sensitive data shared online is vulnerable to cyber threats and
breaches.
❌ Coordination Challenges – Managing remote teams across different time zones can be
difficult.
❌ Reliance on Technology – Business operations depend heavily on stable internet and
software tools.
❌ Difficult Performance Monitoring – Measuring employee productivity and
engagement is challenging in remote settings.
PMOB: UNIT-2 P a g e 12 | 21
(g) Cellular Organization Structure
A Cellular Organization Structure is a decentralized business model where the
organization is divided into small, autonomous units called "cells." Each cell functions
independently but aligns with the company's overall mission. These cells are self-
managed, adaptable, and work collaboratively to achieve business objectives.
Features:
1. Small, Independent Units (Cells) – The organization is divided into multiple small
teams (cells), each with decision-making power.
2. Self-Managed Teams – Each cell is responsible for its operations, innovation, and
performance.
3. Interconnected Cells – Although independent, cells collaborate and share
knowledge/resources.
4. Flexibility & Adaptability – Cells can quickly respond to changes in the market or
industry.
5. Innovation-Driven Approach – Encourages experimentation, creativity, and
continuous improvement.
6. Decentralized Decision-Making – Each cell has the authority to make strategic
decisions relevant to its function.
Merits:
✅ Increased Innovation – Small teams can experiment and innovate without
bureaucratic restrictions.
✅ Faster Decision-Making – Each cell has the authority to make decisions, reducing
delays.
✅ High Flexibility – Cells can quickly adapt to market changes and customer needs.
✅ Employee Empowerment – Employees feel more responsible and motivated due to
autonomy.
✅ Improved Collaboration – Cells work together, fostering teamwork and knowledge
sharing.
✅ Scalability – New cells can be easily added without disrupting the existing structure.
Limitations:
❌ Coordination Challenges – Managing multiple independent units can be complex.
❌ Duplication of Efforts – Different cells may work on similar tasks, leading to
inefficiencies.
❌ Resource Allocation Issues – Some cells may have more resources than others,
creating imbalance.
❌ Risk of Isolation – Cells working too independently may lose alignment with overall
company goals.
❌ Difficult Performance Monitoring – Tracking performance across multiple self-
managed units can be challenging.
PMOB: UNIT-2 P a g e 13 | 21
Examples: Gore-Tex (W. L. Gore & Associates)
• Gore-Tex, a global materials science company, uses a cellular structure where
employees work in small, self-managing teams.
• Each team (cell) focuses on a specific product, market, or innovation area.
• The company has no formal hierarchy, and leaders emerge based on expertise
rather than job titles.
• This structure has led to continuous innovation and high employee engagement.
Other Examples:
• Spotify – Uses "Squads" (small autonomous teams) to manage product
development.
• Semco (Brazilian Manufacturing Firm) – Encourages self-managed teams with full
decision-making authority.
• Zappos – Follows a "holacracy" model where employees work in decentralized
teams.
PMOB: UNIT-2 P a g e 14 | 21
6. Shared Leadership – Leadership is often distributed among team members rather
than a single manager.
7. Innovation & Problem-Solving – Encourages creativity and diverse perspectives
to find effective solutions.
Merits:
✅ Improved Collaboration – Teams work closely together, promoting a culture of
teamwork.
✅ Faster Problem-Solving – Different skill sets lead to quicker and more effective
solutions.
✅ Higher Employee Engagement – Employees feel valued and have more autonomy
over their work.
✅ Greater Innovation – Cross-functional collaboration enhances creativity and idea
generation.
✅ Efficient Use of Skills – Employees are assigned to teams based on expertise,
maximizing productivity.
✅ Flexibility & Adaptability – Teams can easily adjust to changing business
environments.
Limitations:
❌ Conflicts & Miscommunication – Different working styles and opinions may lead to
disagreements.
❌ Accountability Issues – Shared responsibilities can sometimes result in a lack of clear
accountability.
❌ Coordination Challenges – Managing multiple teams across departments can be
complex.
❌ Time-Consuming Decision-Making – Consensus-based decisions can take longer than
top-down management.
❌ Dependency on Team Dynamics – The success of the structure depends on how well
teams function together.
❌ Difficulty in Performance Evaluation – Measuring individual contributions within a
team can be challenging.
Example: Google
• Google uses a team-based approach for innovation and project development.
• Employees work in cross-functional teams to develop new technologies, such as
AI, cloud computing, and search engine algorithms.
• The "20% rule" allows employees to spend 20% of their time on projects outside
their job role, encouraging creativity and teamwork.
• This structure has led to innovations like Gmail, Google Maps, and Google Drive.
Other Examples:
• Spotify – Uses "Squads" (small teams with autonomy) to handle different parts of
product development.
PMOB: UNIT-2 P a g e 15 | 21
• Tesla – Engineers, designers, and software developers work in teams to develop
electric vehicles.
• Apple – Teams of designers, engineers, and marketers collaborate to create new
products like the iPhone.
PMOB: UNIT-2 P a g e 16 | 21
✅ Better Employee Work-Life Balance – Remote work options provide flexibility for
employees.
✅ Collaboration Beyond Organizational Limits – Encourages partnerships with external
companies, freelancers, and stakeholders.
Limitations:
❌ Difficult to Maintain Organizational Culture – A dispersed workforce may struggle
with identity and values.
❌ Communication Challenges – Time zone differences and lack of face-to-face
interaction can impact collaboration.
❌ Security & Data Privacy Risks – Digital dependence increases cybersecurity threats.
❌ Lack of Clear Authority & Accountability – Decision-making can become unclear due
to flexible roles.
❌ Employee Engagement & Motivation Issues – Remote employees may feel isolated or
disconnected.
❌ Technology Dependence – Requires advanced digital tools and infrastructure for
seamless operations.
Example: IBM
• IBM operates as a global boundary-less organization, utilizing virtual teams and
cloud-based collaboration tools.
• Employees work remotely across different countries, contributing to projects
regardless of location.
• The company encourages open-source innovation and partnerships with startups,
research institutions, and external talent.
Other Examples:
• Tesla – Works with external suppliers, researchers, and partners worldwide to
develop electric vehicles.
• Airbnb – Operates a decentralized workforce, using a network-based collaboration
approach.
• Amazon – Uses cross-functional global teams to innovate and optimize operations.
PMOB: UNIT-2 P a g e 17 | 21
(j) Inverted Pyramid Structure:
The Inverted Pyramid Organization Structure is a leadership model that places employees
and customers at the top, while leaders and management serve as facilitators at the
bottom. This structure flips the traditional hierarchy, empowering employees to take
ownership of decisions and focus on customer satisfaction.
Features:
1. Employee-Centric Model – Frontline employees are given decision-making power
and responsibility.
2. Leadership as Support System – Managers and executives act as mentors rather
than controllers.
3. Focus on Customer Needs – The organization prioritizes delivering value directly
to customers.
4. Decentralized Decision-Making – Employees make key decisions without waiting
for top-down approval.
5. Empowerment & Autonomy – Employees have the authority and trust to manage
their own work.
6. Flat Hierarchy – Fewer managerial levels reduce bureaucracy and improve
efficiency.
7. Strong Communication & Collaboration – Encourages open dialogue between all
levels of employees.
Merits:
✅ Enhances Employee Engagement & Motivation – Employees feel valued and
empowered, leading to higher job satisfaction.
✅ Encourages Innovation & Creativity – Decentralized decision-making fosters new
ideas and problem-solving.
✅ Faster Decision-Making – Fewer layers of management allow quicker responses to
customer needs.
✅ Customer-Centric Approach – Employees focus on delivering excellent customer
service and experiences.
✅ Improved Workplace Culture – Encourages trust, collaboration, and transparency
within the organization.
✅ Higher Productivity – Employees take ownership of their work, increasing efficiency.
Limitations:
❌ Lack of Clear Leadership Authority – Without strong leadership, employees may
struggle with direction.
❌ Decision-Making Risks – Employees with decision-making power might make errors
due to lack of experience.
❌ Difficult to Implement in Large Organizations – Requires significant cultural and
structural changes.
❌ Challenges in Maintaining Consistency – With decentralized authority, ensuring
uniform processes can be difficult.
PMOB: UNIT-2 P a g e 18 | 21
❌ Not Suitable for All Industries – Works best in customer-focused industries like
hospitality and retail but may not be ideal for highly regulated sectors.
Example: Nordstrom
• The retail giant Nordstrom follows an inverted pyramid structure where
employees are given autonomy to make customer-centric decisions.
• Store associates are empowered to handle customer complaints, discounts, and
service requests without needing managerial approval.
• Leadership focuses on supporting employees by providing the resources and tools
they need to succeed.
Other Examples:
• Ritz-Carlton Hotels – Employees have the authority to go above and beyond to
serve customers.
• Zappos – Encourages a flat hierarchy where employees have decision-making
power to improve customer service.
• Southwest Airlines – Empowers frontline employees, especially cabin crew and
customer service teams, to enhance the passenger experience.
PMOB: UNIT-2 P a g e 19 | 21
3. Customer-Centric: Ensures that every activity adds value for the customer.
4. Decentralized Decision-Making: Empowers employees to make quick decisions at
all levels.
5. Cross-Functional Teams: Encourages collaboration between different
departments.
6. Agile and Flexible Processes: Quickly adapts to changes in business and customer
needs.
Merits:
✅ Higher Efficiency: Eliminates waste and streamlines operations.
✅ Cost-Effective: Reduces operational expenses through lean management.
✅ Faster Decision-Making: Fewer approval layers speed up processes.
✅ Encourages Innovation: Employees are encouraged to suggest improvements.
✅ Better Customer Satisfaction: Focuses on providing value-driven products and
services.
Limitations:
❌ Employee Stress: Constant focus on efficiency can create pressure.
❌ Requires Cultural Change: Employees need to adopt a mindset of continuous
improvement.
❌ Risk of Over-Optimization: Eliminating too many processes may lead to inefficiencies
in critical areas.
❌ Difficult to Implement in Large Organizations: Requires significant effort to
restructure traditional systems.
Example:
• Toyota: Implemented the Toyota Production System (TPS) to optimize
manufacturing and eliminate waste.
• Amazon: Uses lean principles to improve logistics and customer service efficiency.
• Tesla: Focuses on lean operations in its supply chain and production processes.
-*-*-*-
Compiled by:
Dr. N. Aruna Kumari,
Asst. Professor in Management
VNR VJIET
PMOB: UNIT-2 P a g e 21 | 21