Scribd
Upload
10 views2 pages

Lab5 CPEN21 Ver2 2

The document outlines the submission requirements and grading criteria for a Grade Evaluation System project. It specifies the need for screenshots of code and output, as well as a detailed reflection on the learning experience. The grading criteria include correctness, reflection quality, logic use, efficiency, and output formatting, each rated on a scale from poor to excellent.

Uploaded by

melvinllaneta709
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
10 views2 pages

Lab5 CPEN21 Ver2 2

The document outlines the submission requirements and grading criteria for a Grade Evaluation System project. It specifies the need for screenshots of code and output, as well as a detailed reflection on the learning experience. The grading criteria include correctness, reflection quality, logic use, efficiency, and output formatting, each rated on a scale from poor to excellent.

Uploaded by

melvinllaneta709
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Name: Date:

Section: Batch:

Grade Evaluation System


Submission Requirements
1. Screenshot of Code:
o A clear, full screenshot of the complete code implementation.
2. Screenshot of Output:
o A complete screenshot showing the program's execution and the output for sample inputs.
3. Detailed Takeaway:
o A detailed write-up explaining what you learned or challenges faced during the activity.

2
4 1
Criteria 5 3 (Needs Score
(Good) (Poor)
Improvement)
(Excellent) (Satisfactor
y)

Displays all Displays all Doesn't /5


Displays most Displays some
information information, display
information, but information with
Correctness correctly minor relevant
with errors or significant
with proper formatting information
omissions. errors.
formatting. issues. or crashes.

Detailed /5
and Good
insightful reflection, No
Basic reflection Vague or
reflection covering reflection or
Takeaway with minimal incomplete
on main irrelevant
insight. reflection.
challenges challenges or response.
and learnings.
learnings.

Correct use /5
of logic, Mostly Logic has some Logic errors
Use of Logic is flawed,
calculations, correct logic errors or prevent
Instructions with significant
and with minor unnecessary program
(Logic) inefficiencies.
conditional inefficiencies. calculations. execution.
statements.

Efficient /5
Mostly Works, but has Inefficient with Highly
and concise,
efficient, few inefficiencies or many inefficient
Efficiency no
redundant unnecessary unnecessary and overly
unnecessary
instructions. instructions. instructions. complex.
instructions.

Clear output, /5
Clear output
minor Mostly clear, but Hard to read or Output is
Formatting and with correct
formatting not well-spaced improperly unreadable
Output newlines
improvements or formatted. formatted output or incorrect.
and spacing.
needed.
Instructions:
Create a program that calculates a student's final grade based on their scores in three components:
● Quizzes (30% of the grade)

● Exams (40% of the grade)

● Projects (30% of the grade)


The program should determine the grade range and provide a corresponding performance level using the following criteria:
● Grade >= 90: "Excellent"

● Grade >= 80 and < 90: "Very Good"

● Grade >= 70 and < 80: "Satisfactory"

● Grade >= 60 and < 70: "Needs Improvement"

● Grade < 60: "Fail"


Tasks:
● Input:
o Scores for quizzes, exams, and projects.
● Process:
o Calculate the weighted grade using the given percentages.
o Use conditional statements to determine the performance level.

● Output:

You might also like