0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views40 pages

Carrier Conc

The document discusses carrier concentrations and distribution functions in semiconductors, focusing on Maxwell-Boltzmann, Fermi-Dirac, and Bose-Einstein distributions. It explains the conditions for equilibrium, the movement of the Fermi level, and how carrier concentrations depend on available states and energy distributions. Additionally, it covers the temperature dependence of carrier concentrations and the intrinsic and extrinsic properties of semiconductors.

Uploaded by

pkeerthana2610
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views40 pages

Carrier Conc

The document discusses carrier concentrations and distribution functions in semiconductors, focusing on Maxwell-Boltzmann, Fermi-Dirac, and Bose-Einstein distributions. It explains the conditions for equilibrium, the movement of the Fermi level, and how carrier concentrations depend on available states and energy distributions. Additionally, it covers the temperature dependence of carrier concentrations and the intrinsic and extrinsic properties of semiconductors.

Uploaded by

pkeerthana2610
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 40

• If they replace column V elements, then act as

acceptors
• Known as amphoteric dopants
• Carrier Concentrations:
– Needed for calculating current transport
– For this, we need:
• Distribution Function (DF) of particles as a
function of energy
• The Density of Available States [known as the
Density of States (DoS)] as a function of energy
• The carrier concentration is a product of these two,
integrated over all allowed energies
Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 1
• Distribution Functions (DF):
– Maxwell-Boltzmann (MB)
– Fermi-Dirac (FD)
– Bose-Einstein (BE)
• Maxwell-Boltzmann Distribution
Function (MBDF):
– For classical, distinguishable particles, without
spin (e.g., gas particles, dilute carrier
concentrations, etc.)

Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 2


– f(E)  exp[E/(kT)]
– n2/n1 = exp[E/(kT)]
E = E2 E1
n1,n2: Particles in energy levels E1,E2
E/(kT): Boltzmann factor
– Particle concentration drops off exponentially
with an increase in energy
– As T, the distribution tends to become
uniform

Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 3


Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 4
• Fermi-Dirac Distribution Function
(FDDF):
– Two basic differences with MBDF:
• Particles have spin and obey Pauli Exclusion
Principle
• Particles are indistinguishable (very heavy
concentration)
1
 f E 
 E  EF 
1  exp  
 kT 
f(E): Probability that a state at an energy E is
occupied by an electron
Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 5
f(E)
1
EF: Fermi Energy
(Average energy of
T1
electrons in the system)
1/2
T2 > T 1 > 0 K
T=0K

0
EF E
Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 6
– At T = 0, f(E) becomes a step function:
• For E < EF, f(E) = 1
• For E > EF, f(E) = 0
– f(E) gives the probability that a QS at energy
E will be occupied
– f(E) = 1/2 for E = EF at all temperatures
– As T, the edges of the step function gets
rounded, and the function spreads out
– Amount of this spread ~ (3-4)kT
– For very high T, the distribution tends to
diffuse and spread out
Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 7
• The Boltzmann Approximation:
– If (EEF) > (3-4)kT:
 EF   E   E 
f  E   exp   exp     exp   
 kT   kT   kT 
Exactly similar to MBDF
 High energy tail of FDDF is Maxwellian
in nature
– [(EEF) > (3-4)kT] is known as the Boltzmann
approximation  greatly simplifies maths
– Separates semiconductors into 2 categories:
degenerate and non-degenerate
Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 8
• Bose-Einstein Distribution Function
(BEDF):
– Applicable for particles:
• With integral spin
→ spin quantum # = 0,1,2,3,…
• Not subject to Pauli Exclusion
• Indistinguishable
– Example: Photons (Generic Name: Bosons)
– DF: 1
f  E   E  kT 
e 1

Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 9


• Conditions for Equilibrium:
– No external excitation except a constant
temperature
– Across any interface, no net:
• Transport of energy
• Carrier motion
• Charge transport
– There can’t be any gradient in the equilibrium
Fermi level EF

Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 10


– Proof:
• Let two layers (1 and 2) in contact with each other
• Let for a given specific energy E:
– The DoS in layers 1 and 2 be g1(E) and g2(E) respectively
– The DF in layers 1 and 2 be f1(E) and f2(E) respectively
• Carrier flow from layer 1 to layer 2:
 (# of filled states in layer 1)  (# of empty states
in layer 2)
 g1(E)f1(E)  g2(E)[1f2(E)] (1)
• Similarly, carrier flow from layer 2 to layer 1:
 g2(E)f2(E)  g1(E)[1f1(E)] (2)

Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 11


• Based on the definition of equilibrium, (1) must equal
(2)
 f1(E) = f2(E)  EF1 = EF2  dEF/dx = 0
 No gradient in EF
An extremely important condition for equilibrium
– Physical Interpretation:
• EF is a measure of average energy of electrons in the
system
• Constant EF implies that electron energy is constant
across the system
 There can’t be any net motion
• When the system is out of equilibrium, then the
equilibrium Fermi level loses its physical significance

Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 12


• Movement of EF Within Eg:
– Intrinsic:
• n = p = ni
• # of electrons in CB = # of holes in VB
• Average energy of electrons in the system will
roughly be at the middle of the band gap
• Known as the intrinsic level Ei
• Ei is not exactly at the middle of the band gap,
however, the difference from the center is so small,
that it can be neglected

Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 13


– n-type:
• n >> p
• # of electrons in CB >> # of holes in VB
• Average electron energy of the system 
• EF moves towards EC
– p-type:
• p >> n
• # of holes in VB >> # of electrons in CB
• Average electron energy of the system 
• EF moves towards EV

Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 14


EC EC EC
EF

Ei = E F Ei Ei

EF
EV EV EV

Intrinsic n-type p-type

Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 15


• Carrier Concentrations:
– Depend not only on f(E), but also on the # of
states available at E
– If there are no available states, then there can’t
be any carriers, irrespective of the value of f(E)
– For example, within the band gap, there is no
available state
 No carrier can stay within the band gap
unless a state is created there somehow,
e.g., dopant/trap levels, recombination
centers, etc.
Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 1
30-60 meV ( Shallow Donor States)
EC
Traps
Eg
Recombination
Ei
Centers
Traps
EV
30-60 meV ( Shallow Acceptor States)

Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 2


• Electron and Hole Concentrations in
Equilibrium:
– Equilibrium electron concentration in CB:

n0   f (E)N(E)dE
EC

– N(E)dE: Density of available states (DoS) per


unit volume in the CB within an
energy range dE
– Note the upper limit (why  ?)

Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 3


– N(E) is calculated using SE under PBC:
3/2
1  2m  *
N(E)  2  2  E1/2
2   
Applicable for both CB and VB by replacing:
m* by m*n and m*p , and E by  E  E C  and
 E V  E  , respectively
– Note:
• At EC and EV , DoS = 0
• Square root dependence on E
Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 4
E
Conduction
Band
1/2
 (E – EC)
EC
0

0
EV
1/2
Valence  (EV – E)
Band

N(E)

Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 5


– Within the band gap, DoS = 0
– In CB, f(E) as E goes above EC
 f(E)N(E)
 Most of the electrons occupy states near
the bottom of CB (~3kT)
– In VB, [1f(E)] as E goes below EV
 Most of the holes occupy states near the
top of the VB (~3kT)
– Can assume that all available states in CB are
located at EC and use FDDF at EC under the
Boltzmann approximation
Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 6
– Thus, electron concentration in CB:
 EC  EF 
n 0  N C f (E C )  N C exp    (show)
 kT 
NC: Effective DoS at EC (note that actual DoS
at EC is zero)
3/2
 2m kT 
*
 2 n
2 
 h 

– Note: N C   m 
32
*
n and  T 3 2
– Care: It is valid only if (ECEF) > 3kT

Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 7


– Similarly, hole concentration in VB:
 EF  EV 
p 0  N V [1  f (E V )]  N V exp   
 kT 

NV: Effective DoS at EV (actual DoS at EV is


zero)
3/2
 2m kT 
*

 2 
p
 h 2
 3 2
*
 
– Note: N V  m p and  T 3 2
– Care: It is valid only if (EFEV) > 3kT

Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 8


– In equilibrium:

 Eg 
n 0 p0  n  N C N V exp  
2
i 
 kT 
 Eg 
 n i  N C N V exp   
 2kT 

– For intrinsic material, EF lies at Ei (intrinsic


level)
– Care: Ei is NOT exactly at the center of the
band gap, since m*n  m*p

Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 9


– Fundamental expressions for carrier
concentrations:
 EC  Ei   Ei  E v 
n i  N C exp    and pi  N v exp   
 kT   kT 
and
 E F  Ei   Ei  E F 
n 0  n i exp   and p0  n i exp  
 kT   kT 

– These expressions are immensely important


– They express n0 and p0 in terms of EC, EV, Ei,
EF, and ni
Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 10
• Temperature Dependence of Carrier
Concentration:
– Explicit temperature dependence through the
term kT
– Implicit dependence through ni
 2kT   Eg 
3/2

n i (T)  2  2  *
(m m )
n
* 3/4
p exp   
 h   2kT 
 Eg 
= AT 32
exp   
 2kT 

Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 11


• Temperature Dependence of Carrier
Concentration:
– Explicit temperature dependence through the
term kT
– Implicit dependence through ni
 2kT   Eg 
3/2

n i (T)  2  2  *
(m m )
n
* 3/4
p exp   
 h   2kT 
 Eg 
= AT 32
exp   
 2kT 

Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 1


– A: Temperature independent constant
– Temperature dependent terms: T3/2 and
exp[Eg/(2kT)]
– Obviously, the latter one would dominate
– Also Eg has a very weak temperature
dependence (Varshini Model):
T 2
E g  T   E g0 
T
E g0  E g at T = 0 

,: Constants (material dependent)


– For rough calculations, this dependence of Eg
on temperature is generally ignored
Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 2
Material
Eg0  
(eV) (eV/K) (K)
–4
Ge 0.74 4.7710 235
–4
Si 1.17 4.7310 636
–4
GaAs 1.52 5.4110 204

Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 3


Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 4
• Concentration as a Function of Temperature:

N D = 1015 cm 3

Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 5


– Consider an n-type material with donor doping
ND cm3
– Free electron concentration = n0
– At very low T, all dopants are not ionized
 n0 small
– As T , n0, since more dopants start to get
ionized
– Known as the Ionization Zone
– After all dopants get ionized, n0 = ND, and stays
constant w.r.t. T
– Known as the Extrinsic Zone
Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 6
– In the background, ni keeps on growing
exponentially with T
– A point comes when n0 approaches ni
– Beyond this point, n0 follows ni, and the
semiconductor is no more extrinsic
 End of the Extrinsic Zone and start of the
Intrinsic Zone
– Definition of Extrinsic Zone:
The range of temperature over which the
majority carrier concentration remains equal to
the doping concentration and is sufficiently
greater than ni (about 2-5 times)
Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 7
– The extrinsic range is a function of the doping
concentration
• As the doping concentration, the extrinsic range
also
– For a given material, the dopant concentration
should be chosen such that it gives a
sufficiently large extrinsic range
– Obvious that Ge has the least extrinsic range
(why?), followed by Si, and GaAs has the
largest extrinsic range, for any value of doping

Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 8


• Space Charge Neutrality:
– Intrinsic material is charge neutral
– Extrinsic material also is charge neutral
– Total four types of charges present in a
semiconductor:
• Electrons n0 (negative)
• Holes p0 (positive)
 Ionized Donors N D (positive)
 Ionized Acceptors N A (negative)
– Total positive charges must equal total
negative charges

Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 9


– Leads to the expression for the space charge
neutrality:
 
p0  N D  n 0  N A
– This, along with the law of mass action
uniquely determines n0 and p0 for given values
of ND and NA
– In general, 100% ionization approximation is
valid for shallow dopants:
 p0 + ND = n0 + NA
– Interesting scenario:
If ND = NA  n0 = p0 = ni

Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 10


– Sample has turned intrinsic by doping of both
types of equal magnitude:
Known as Full Compensation
Can also be partially compensated
– Note:
• If NA = 0 and ND >> ni, n0  ND and 0
p  n 2
i ND

• If ND = 0 and NA >> ni, p0  NA and n 0  n i N A


2

• If (NDNA) >> ni, n0  (NDNA) and p 0  n i2  N D  N A 


• If (NAND) >> ni, p0  (NAND) and n 0  n i2  N A  N D 

Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 11


• Resistivity and Conductivity:
– General Expression for Extrinsic Conductivity:
 = 1/ = q(nn + pp)
n,p: Electron,hole mobility
– Mobility:
• Measure of ease of carrier motion under an applied
electric field
• Given by:  = vd/E
vd: drift velocity
E : electric field
• Defined as velocity per unit electric field

Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 12


– For intrinsic material, intrinsic conductivity:
i = 1/i = qni(n+p)
– Care: i is not the same as max
– Exercise: Find the condition to obtain max
– In intrinsic Si:
n ~ 1300-1400 cm2/V-s
p ~ 400-500 cm2/V-s
– In intrinsic GaAs:
n ~ 8500-9000 cm2/V-s
p ~ 400-500 cm2/V-s
Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 13
– With doping, these values drop
– Doping classifications:
• 1012-1014 cm3: Low
• 1015-1017 cm3: Moderate
• 1018-1019 cm3: High
• > 1019 cm3: Very high (degenerate)
– Under degenerate doping, n and p can drop to
as low as 500 and 200 cm2/V-s respectively
– Conductivity can be increased greatly by:
• Light (photo-conductivity)
• Temperature
• Doping
• High energy carrier bombardment

Aloke Dutta/EE/IIT Kanpur 14

You might also like