Chem Project
Chem Project
A PROJECT REPORT ON
SUBMITTED BY
R. TANUSHREE
XII B2 - SCIENCE STREAM
BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE
1
This is to certify that TANUSHREE.R ,a student of GRADE XII
has completed chemistry project, entitled
‘BONDING IN COORDINTION COMPOUNDS’ under the guidance
of Mrs. T.KOWSALYA.,(PGT-CHEMISTRY) during the
academic year2024-25 in partial fulfillment of CHEMISTRY
PRACTICAL EXAMINATION conducted by SSCE, New
Delhi.
REGISTER NUMBER:
DATE OF EXAMINATION:
BIBILIOGRAPHY
NCERT CHEMISTRY PART I
2
https://unacademy.com/content/cbse-class-12/study
material/chemistry/coordination-compounds/
https://ncert.nic.in/textbook/pdf/lech109.pdf
https://byjus.com/jee/coordination-compounds/
3
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
4
I am highly thankful to Mr MANOHAR T, lab incharge
for his valuable guidance and for his constant
encouragement.
5
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION
X. BIBLIOGRAPHY
6
INTRODUCTION
7
WERNER’S THEORY
8
BONDING IN COORDINATION
COMPOUNDS
9
Coordination compound bonding is presently
the subject of a slew of hypotheses. American
physicists Linus Pauling and John C. Slater
devised an important component of the valence
bond theory for coordination compounds, which
explains bonding by examining how many
empty electrons the metal ion’s hybridised
orbitals have. A coordinate-covalent bond is
formed when an unfilled metal ion orbital and a
filled ligand orbital overlap, and each ligand
provides an electron pair to do so.
As an example, sp (linear), sp3 (tetrahedron),
dsp2 (planar), and D2sp33 (octahedron) are all
examples of hybridizations in which orbitals of a
given type and number participate in the
hybridization. In many cases, the number of
10
unpaired electrons measured is in agreement
with the theoretical forecast. By differentiating
between inner orbital complexes (d2sp3) and
outer orbital complexes (sp3d3), Henry Taube, a
Canadian-born American Chemistry Nobel
winner, further developed the theory in 1952 to
account for discrepancies between octahedral
complexes.
LIMITATIONS OF VALENCE BOND THEORY
11
II. CRYSTAL FIELD THEORY: The Crystal Field
Theory (CFT) is a model for transition metal and
ligand binding interactions. It depicts the impact
of the ligand’s non-bonding electrons being
attracted by the positive charge of the metal
cation and the negative charge of the metal
cation. Due to the static electric field produced
by a surrounding charge distribution, the
degeneracy of electronic orbital states,
commonly d or f orbitals, is broken as the
ligands approach the core metal ion. CFT can
account for various magnetic characteristics,
hues, and hydration energies of transition metal
complexes, but it fails to account for bonding.
12
The ligands’ arrangement around the
metal ion.
13
III. LIGAND FIELD THEORY: Ligand field
theory is the most powerful bonding theory for
coordination compounds. It is essentially
molecular orbital theory applied to coordination
compounds. It can explain covalent bonding in
coordination compounds, it can explain their
shapes, it can explain their magnetism, and
their electronic spectra. It can also explain the
stability of coordination compounds, in
particular the 18e rule and their exceptions. It
is, however, more complicated than other
bonding theories.
Just like in molecular orbital theory we can
apply symmetry adapted linear combination of
atomic orbitals to construct molecular orbitals.
However, slightly modified rules apply to
optimize molecular orbital theory for
coordination compounds. These modifications
are useful due to the greater complexity of
coordination compounds. In the first step we
determine the point group of the molecule and
assign axes in a useful way. In the second step,
we determine the valence orbitals, also called
frontier orbitals of the metal. For example, for a
transition metal of the 4th period we would
consider the 4s, the 4p, and the 3d orbitals as
the frontier orbitals. Next, we determine the
symmetry of these orbitals. We can do this by
14
just looking into the character table of the
respective point group. In the following we
select the highest-energy ligand orbitals that
are suitable for σ-bonding. For ligands that are
molecules or polyatomic ions, these orbitals are
the HOMOs suitable for σ-bonding. For simple
ions like chloro-ligands these are the highest
occupied atomic orbitals. Next, we group the
selected ligand orbitals to form ligand group
orbitals (LGOs), and determine their symmetry
types. To do so, we determine the reducible
representation, and then the irreducible
representations of the LGOs. This gives us the
symmetry types of the ligand group orbitals. We
then combine metal frontier orbitals and ligand
group orbitals of the same symmetry type to
form molecular orbitals. Now we have
constructed all molecular orbitals suitable for σ-
bonding, and can draw a molecular orbital
diagram for the σ-bonding in the coordination
compound.
Next, we look for ligand orbitals that are
suitable for π-bonding with the metal. We then
determine the symmetry types of their ligand
group orbitals. Ligand group orbitals and metal
orbitals of the same symmetry will then be
combined to form molecular orbitals. These
MOs represent the π-bonding in the molecule.
We add these molecular orbitals to the
15
molecular orbital diagram. Finally, we check if
there are ligand orbitals suitable for δ𝛿-bonding
with the metal. If so, we also form ligands group
orbitals for these, determine their symmetry
types, and combine ligand group orbitals and
metal orbitals of the same symmetry to form
molecular orbitals. These orbitals will then also
be added to the molecular orbital diagram.
16
NOMENCLATURE IN COORDINATION
COMPOUNDS
Nomenclature is important in coordination
chemistry because of the need to have
unambiguous method of describing formulas
and writing systematic names, particularly
when dealing with isomers
I. FORMULAS OF MONONUCLEAR
COORDINATION ENTITIES: Mononuclear
coordination entities contain a single central metal
atom. The following rules are applied while writing
the formulas:
The central atom is listed first
The ligands are then listed in alphabetical order.
The placement of a ligand in the list does not
depend on its charge.
Polydentate ligands are also listed alphabetically.
In case of abbreviated ligand, the first letter of
the abbreviation is used to determine the
position of the ligand in the alphabetical order
The formula for the entire coordination entity,
whether charged or not, is enclosed in square
brackets. When ligands are polyatomic, their
formulas are enclosed in parentheses. Ligand
abbreviations are also enclosed in parentheses
There should be no space between the ligands
and the metal within a coordination sphere
17
When the formula of a charged coordination
entity is to be written without that of the counter
icon, the charge is indicated outside the square
brackets as a right superscript with the number
before the sigh.
The charge of the cation is balanced by the
charge of the anion.
18
metals, the Latin names are used in the complex
anions, e.g., ferrate for Fe.
(v) The neutral complex molecule is named similar to
that of the complex cation
19
DEFINITIONS OF SOME IMPORTANT
TERMS PERTAINING TO COORDINATION
COMPOUNDS
20
is said to be unidentate. When a ligand can bind
through two donor atoms as in H 2NCH2CH2NH2
(ethane-1,2-diamine) or C2O42– (oxalate), the ligand is
said to be didentate and when several donor atoms
are present in a single ligand as in N(CH 2CH2NH2)3,
the ligand is said to be polydentate.
Ethylenediaminetetraacetate ion (EDTA4–) is an
important hexadentate ligand. It can bind through
two nitrogen and four oxygen atoms to a central
metal ion.
(d) Coordination number: The coordination number
(CN) of a metal ion in a complex can be defined as
the number of ligand donor atoms to which the metal
is directly bonded. For example, in the complex ions,
[PtCl6]2– and [Ni(NH3)4]2+, the coordination number of
Pt and Ni are 6 and 4 respectively. Similarly, in the
complex ions, [Fe(C2O4)3]3– and [Co(en)3]3+, the
coordination number of both, Fe and Co, is 6 because
C2O42– and en (ethane-1,2-diamine) are didentate
ligands
It is important to note here that coordination number
of the central atom/ion is determined only by the
number of sigma bonds formed by the ligand with the
central atom/ion. Pi bonds, if formed between the
ligand and the central atom/ion, are not counted for
this purpose.
(e) Coordination sphere: The central atom/ion and
the ligands attached to it are enclosed in square
bracket and is collectively termed as the coordination
21
sphere. The ionisable groups are written outside the
bracket and are called counter ions. For example, in
the complex K4[Fe(CN)6 ], the coordination sphere is
[Fe(CN)6 ]4– and the counter ion is K+ .
(f) Coordination polyhedron: The spatial arrangement
of the ligand atoms which are directly attached to the
central atom/ion defines a coordination polyhedron
about the central atom. The most common
coordination polyhedra are octahedral, square planar
and tetrahedral. For example, [Co(NH3 )6]3+ is
octahedral, [Ni(CO)4 ] is tetrahedral and [PtCl4 ]2– is
square planar. Fig. 5.1 shows the shapes of different
coordination polyhedral
(g) Oxidation number of central atom: The oxidation
number of the central atom in a complex is defined
as the charge it would carry if all the ligands are
removed along with the electron pairs that are
shared with the central atom. The oxidation number
is represented by a Roman numeral in parenthesis
following the name of the coordination entity. For
example, oxidation number of copper in [Cu(CN)4]3– is
+1 and it is written as Cu(I).
(h) Homoleptic and heteroleptic complexes:
Complexes in which a metal is bound to only one kind
of donor groups, e.g., [Co(NH3)6]3+, are known as
homoleptic. Complexes in which a metal is bound to
more than one kind of donor groups, e.g.,
[Co(NH3)4Cl2]+, are known as heteroleptic
22
ISOMERISM IN COORDINATION
COMPOUNDS
STRUCTURAL ISOMERISM
Linkage isomerism: arises in a coordination
compound containing ambidentate ligand. A simple
example is provided by complexes containing the
thiocyanate ligand, NCS– , which may bind through
23
the nitrogen to give M–NCS or through sulphur to
give M–SCN. Jørgensen discovered such behaviour in
the complex [Co(NH3)5 (NO2 )]Cl2 , which is obtained
as the red form, in which the nitrite ligand is bound
through oxygen (–ONO), and as the yellow form, in
which the nitrite ligand is bound through nitrogen (–
NO2 ).
COORDINATION ISOMERISM: This type of isomerism
arises from the interchange of ligands between
cationic and anionic entities of different metal ions
present in a complex. An example is provided by
[Co(NH3 )6 ][Cr(CN)6 ], in which the NH 3 ligands are
bound to Co3+ and the CN– ligands to Cr 3+. In its
coordination isomer [Cr(NH3 )6 ][Co(CN)6 ], the NH3
ligands are bound to Cr3+ and the CN– ligands to
Co3+.
IONISATION ISOMERISM: This form of isomerism
arises when the counter ion in a complex salt is itself
a potential ligand and can displace a ligand which
can then become the counter ion. An example is
provided by the ionisation isomers [Co(NH 3 )5
24
(SO4 )]Br and [Co( .
25
STEREOISOMERISM
Stereoisomers have the same chemical formula and
chemical bonds but they have different spatial
arrangement. Structural isomers have different
bonds. A detailed account of these isomers are given
below:
26
GEOMETRIC ISOMERISM: This type of isomerism
arises in heteroleptic complexes due to different
possible geometric arrangements of the ligands. The
two ligands X may be arranged adjacent to each
other in a cis isomer, or opposite to each other in a
trans isomer.
27
IMPORTANCE AND APPLICATIONS
Coordination compounds find use in many
qualitative and quantitative chemical analysis.
The familiar colour reactions given by metal ions
with a number of ligands (especially chelating
ligands), as a result of formation of coordination
entities, form the basis for their detection and
estimation by classical and instrumental methods
of analysis. Examples of such reagents include
EDTA, DMG (dimethylglyoxime), a–nitroso–b–
naphthol, cupron, etc.
Hardness of water is estimated by simple
titration with Na2EDTA. The Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions
form stable complexes with EDTA. The selective
estimation of these ions can be done due to
difference in the stability constants of calcium
and magnesium complexes.
Some important extraction processes of metals,
like those of silver and gold, make use of
complex formation. Gold, for example, combines
with cyanide in the presence of oxygen and water
to form the coordination entity [Au(CN)2]– in
aqueous solution. Gold can be separated in
metallic form from this solution by the addition of
zinc.
Similarly, purification of metals can be achieved
through formation and subsequent
decomposition of their coordination compounds.
For example, impure nickel is converted to
28
[Ni(CO)4 ], which is decomposed to yield pure
nickel
Articles can be electroplated with silver and gold
much more smoothly and evenly from solutions
of the complexes, [Ag(CN)2]– and [Au(CN)2]– than
from a solution of simple metal ions.
In black and white photography, the developed
film is fixed by washing with hypo solution which
dissolves the undecomposed AgBr to form a
complex ion, [Ag(S2O3 )2]3–
There is growing interest in the use of chelate
therapy in medicinal chemistry. An example is
the treatment of problems caused by the
presence of metals in toxic proportions in
plant/animal systems. Thus, excess of copper and
iron are removed by the chelating ligands D–
penicillamine and desferrioxime B via the
formation of coordination compounds. EDTA is
used in the treatment of lead poisoning. Some
coordination compounds of platinum effectively
inhibit the growth of tumours. Examples are: cis–
platin and related compounds.
29
30