BECE317L Module1 Part(a)
BECE317L Module1 Part(a)
Dr. Ramesh R
AB1 504 Cabin 6
Good Morning to all
Module:1 Mobile Radio Propagation: Large Scale
Fading
Overview of Wireless Communication, Cellular concept – Frequency reuse – Channel
assignment strategies – Handoff strategies – Interference and system capacity – Trunking and
mechanisms, Free space model, Two ray model, Outdoor and indoor propagation
Efficient Use for Specific Applications: Ideal for applications where only
one-way communication is necessary, such as broadcasting, keyboard input to
a computer, or sending data to a printer.
Disadvantages of Simplex Mode
Lack of Bidirectional Communication: The most significant disadvantage is
the incapacity to send data back in the opposite way. This limitation makes it
unsuitable for interactive communication.
Inefficiency for Complex Tasks: Simplex mode is not suitable for tasks
requiring response or acknowledgment, such as error-checking or data
authentication, which are crucial in many communication systems.
Limited Flexibility: Simplex systems lack flexibility because they cannot be
easily adjusted to situations where bidirectional communication might become
necessary.
Not Ideal for Modern Networks: Most advanced communication systems
require bidirectional data flow, making simplex mode largely antiquated in
networking scenarios.
Half-Duplex Mode
• In half-duplex mode, Sender can send the data and also receive the data one
sequentially. It is a bidirectional communication but limited to only one at a
time. Example , Walkie-Talkie, in which information is sent one at a time but
in bi-directions.
• Half-duplex mode is a balance between simplex and full-duplex modes,
providing dual communication but with some compromises in speed and
performance.
Advantages of Half-Duplex Mode
Efficient Use of Channel: Half-duplex allows for bidirectional communication
over a single channel, making it effective for scenarios where parallel
transmission isn’t required.
Cost-Effective: It requires less complicated and less costly hardware than full-
duplex systems, as only one device conveys at a time.
Simplified Collision Handling: Since only one device can transmit at a time,
crashes are reduced, reducing the need for complicated collision detection and
management protocols.
Suitable for Periodic Communication: Optimal for situations where
communication doesn’t need to happen concurrently in both directions, such as
walkie-talkies or specific network protocols.
Disadvantages of Half-Duplex Mode
Slower Data Transmission: Since data can only run in one direction at a time,
communication is naturally delayed compared to full-duplex systems where data
can be delivered and received simultaneously.
Increased Latency: The need to exchange between sending and receiving
modes introduces delay, which can affect performance in congestion
applications.
Not Ideal for High-Traffic Networks: In networks with congestion or
applications requiring constant communication, half-duplex mode can become a
restriction.
Inefficient for Complex Communications: For tasks that require frequent two
way communication, half-duplex can be less effective as it forces devices to wait
their turn, which can lead to pauses.
Full Duplex Mode
• Full-duplex mode, Sender can send the data and also can receive the data
simultaneously. It is dual way communication that is both way of
communication happens at a same time. Example of this kind of transmission
is Telephone Network, where communication happens parallel.
Advantages of Full-Duplex Mode
High-Speed Communication: Data transfer is quicker because there is no
delaying for the channel to clear before sending or receiving data.
In simplex mode, sender can send In Half Duplex mode, sender can In Full Duplex mode, sender can
Sender and Receiver the data but that sender can’t send the data and also can receive send the data and also can receive
receive the data. the data but one at a time. the data simultaneously.
Usage of one channel for the Usage of one channel for the Usage of two channels for the
Channel usage
transmission of data. transmission of data. transmission of data.
Example of simplex mode are: Example of half duplex mode is: Example of full duplex mode is:
BECE317L Wireless and Mobile Communications
Dr. Ramesh R
AB1 504 Cabin 6
Good Morning to all
Evolution Of Wireless Technologies 1G To 5G In Mobile
Communication
The evolution of cellular mobile communications.
History of wireless technology
• Roaming is possible
• Enhanced security
• Limited mobility
• EDGE – Enhanced Data GSM Evolution was also developed to improve the
data rate for GSM networks. EDGE was capable of supporting up to
473.6kbps (maximum).
• CDMA2000 was also introduced to support higher data rates for CDMA
networks. This technology has the ability to provide up to 384 kbps data rate
(maximum).
3G – Third-generation communication system
• UMTS has a data rate of 384kbps, and it supports video calling for the first
time on mobile devices.
• Video calling
• TV streaming
• High-quality 3D games
3.5G to 3.75 Systems
• In order to enhance the data rate in existing 3G networks, two
technology improvements are introduced to the network.
• HSDPA – High-Speed Downlink Packet Access and HSUPA – High-
Speed Uplink Packet Access, developed and deployed to the 3G
networks.
• 3.5G network can support up to 2Mbps data rate.
• 3.75 system is an improved version of the 3G network with HSPA+
High-Speed Packet Access Plus. Later this system will evolve into a
more powerful 3.9G system known as LTE (Long Term Evolution).
Disadvantages of 3G systems
• Simultaneous transmission of voice and data is possible with an LTE system, which
significantly improves the data rate. All services, including voice services, can be
transmitted over IP packets. Complex modulation schemes and carrier aggregation
are used to multiply uplink/downlink capacity.
• Costly spectrum (in most countries, frequency bands are too expensive)
• Cluster Patterns: Cell clusters are constructed using patterns such as 1/3, 1/4,
1/7, and so on, depending on the desired reuse factor. Each pattern specifies the
number of cells in a cluster and the minimum distance necessary between cells
with the same frequencies to avoid interference.
No. of channels in a single cell (k) = Total no. of channels in the system/ Frequency
reuse factor
=800 / 5 = 160
No. of clusters reqd. to cover the geography (M) = 300/5 = 60
Write the expression for system capacity (C) in terms of total number of channels (S).
C = S × M = N ×k × M
C = 800 × 60 = 48000
If a total of 33 MHz of bandwidth is allocated to a particular FDD cellular
telephone system which uses two 25 kHz simplex channels to provide full duplex
voice and control channels, compute the number of channels available per cell if a
system uses (a) four-cell reuse, (b) seven-cell reuse, and (c) 12-cell reuse.
Solution
Given:
Total bandwidth = 33 MHz
Channel bandwidth = 25 kHz × 2 simplex channels = 50 kHz/duplex channel
Total available channels = 33,000/50 = 660 channels
(a) For N = 4,
total number of channels available per cell = 660/4 ≈ 165 channels.
(b) For N = 7,
total number of channels available per cell = 660/7 ≈ 95 channels.
(c) For N = 12,
total number of channels available per cell = 660/12 ≈ 55 channels.
Handoff in Mobile Connections
(a) How many times would the cluster of size 7 have to be replicated in order to
cover the entire service area? Calculate the number of channels per cell and
the system capacity.
(b) If the cluster size is decreased from 7 to 4, then does it result into increase in
system capacity? Comment on the results
obtained.
Service area of a cellular system, Asys = 4200 km2 (given)
Coverage area of a cell, Acell = 12 km2 (given)
Total number of available channels, N = 1001 (given)
(a) To calculate number of clusters, cell capacity, and system capacity
Cluster size, K = 7 (given)
Step 1. To calculate the coverage area of a cluster
The coverage area of a cluster, Acluster = K × Acell
Therefore, Acluster = 7 × 12 km2 = 84 km2
Step 2. To calculate the number of clusters
The number of times that the cluster has to be replicated tocover the entire service area of
cellular system = Asys Acluster Or, number of clusters, M = 4200 84
Hence, number of clusters, M = 50 clusters
Step 3. To calculate cell capacity
Since total number of available channels are allocated to one cluster, therefore,
the number of channels per cell, J = N K
Or, cell capacity, J = 1001 7
Hence, cell capacity, J = 143 channels/cell
Step 4. To calculate system capacity
The system capacity, C = N × M
Or, system capacity, C = 1001 × 50
Hence, the system capacity, C = 50 050 channels
• (b) To calculate new system capacity for reduced K
• New cluster size, K = 4 (given)
• Step 5. To calculate the coverage area of a new cluster
• The coverage area of a cluster, Acluster = K × Acell
• Therefore, Acluster = 4 × 12 km2 = 48 km2
• Step 6. To calculate increased number of clusters
• The number of times that the cluster has to be replicated to
• cover the entire service area of a cellular system = Asys Acluster
• 110 Wireless Communications
• Or, number of clusters, M = 4200 48
• Hence, number of clusters, M = 87 (approx.)
• Step 7. To calculate new system capacity
• The system capacity, C = N × M
• Or, system capacity, C = 1001 × 87
• Hence, the system capacity, C = 87 000 channels
Comments on the results
From (a) and (b) above, it is seen that for decrease in cluster size from 7 to 4
results into an increase in number of clusters from 50 to 87 for a given service
area.
The system capacity is increased from 50,050 channels to 87,000 channels.
Therefore, decreasing the cluster size does increase the system
capacity.
However, the average signal-to-cochannel interference also increases which
has to be kept at an acceptable level in order to achieve desirable signal
quality.
Practical Handoff Considerations
• Figure with Umbrella illustrates an umbrella cell which is collocated with some smaller
microcells. The umbrella cell approach ensures that the number of handoffs is minimized for
high-speed users and provides additional microcell channels for pedestrian users.
• If a high-speed user in the large umbrella cell is approaching the base station, and its velocity
is rapidly decreasing, the base station may decide to hand the user into the co-located
microcell, without MSC intervention.
cell dragging
• Another practical handoff problem in microcell systems is known as cell dragging. Cell
dragging results from pedestrian users that provide a very strong signal to the base station.
Such a situation occurs in an urban environment when there is a line-of-sight (LOS) radio
path between the subscriber and the base station.
• As the user travels away from the base station at a very slow speed, the average signal
strength does not decay rapidly. Even when the user has traveled well beyond the designed
range of the cell, the received signal at the base station may be above the handoff threshold,
thus a handoff may not be made.
• This creates a potential interference and traffic management problem, since the user has
meanwhile traveled deep within a neighboring cell. To solve the cell dragging problem,
handoff thresholds and radio coverage parameters must be adjusted carefully.
Co-channel Interference and System Capacity
• Frequency reuse implies that in a given coverage area there are several cells
that use the same set of frequencies.
• These cells are called co-channel cells, and the interference between signals
from these cells is called co-channel interference.
• By increasing the ratio of D/R, the spatial separation between co-channel cells
relative to the coverage distance of a cell is increased. Thus, interference is reduced
from improved isolation of RF energy from the co-channel cell.
• The parameter Q, called the co-channel reuse ratio, is related to the cluster size.
• Ii is the interference power caused by the ith interfering co-channel cell base
station.
• If the signal levels of co-channel cells are known, then the S/I ratio for the
forward link can be found using Equation
Co-channel Interference and System Capacity contd…
• Propagation measurements in a mobile radio channel show that the average
received signal strength at any point decays as a power law of the distance of
separation between a transmitter and receiver. The average received power
Pr at a distance d from the transmitting antenna is approximated by
Co-channel Interference and System Capacity contd…
where P0 is the power received at a close-in reference point in the far field
region of the antenna at a small distance d0 from the transmitting antenna and
n is the path loss exponent
Co-channel Interference and System Capacity contd…
• consider the forward link where the desired signal is the serving base station
and where the interference is due to co-channel base stations.
• If Di is the distance of the ith interferer from the mobile, the received power at
a given mobile due to the ith interfering cell will be proportional to (Di)–n.
• The path loss exponent typically ranges between two and four in urban cellular
systems.
Co-channel Interference and System Capacity contd…
• When the transmit power of each base station is equal and the path loss exponent is the same
throughout the coverage area, S/I for a mobile can be approximated as
• Considering only the first layer of interfering cells, if all the interfering base stations are
equidistant from the desired base station and if this distance is equal to the distance D between
cell centers, then above equation simplifies to
• Equation relates S/I to the cluster size N, which in turn determines the overall capacity of the
system from the above equation.
Co-channel Interference and System Capacity contd…
• For the U.S. AMPS cellular system which uses FM and 30 kHz channels, subjective tests
indicate that sufficient voice quality is provided when S/I is greater than or equal to 18 dB.
• Using above equation, it can be shown Thus, meet this requirement, the cluster size N
should be at least 6.49, assuming a path loss exponent n = 4.
Thus, a minimum cluster size of seven is required to meet an S/I requirement of 18 dB.
Illustration of the first tier of co-channel cells for a cluster size of N = 7. An approximation of the
exact geometry is shown here, When the mobile is at the cell boundary (point X ), it experiences
worst case co-channel interference on the forward channel. The marked distances between the
mobile and different co-channel cells are based on approximations made for easy analysis.
Co-channel Interference and System Capacity contd…
• Using an exact cell geometry layout, it can be shown for a seven-cell cluster,
with the mobile unit at the cell boundary, the mobile is a distance D – R from
the two nearest co-channel interfering cells and is exactly D + R/2, D, D – R/2,
and D + R from the other interfering cells in the first tier, assuming n = 4, the
signal-to-interference ratio for the worst case can be closely approximated as
• Equation given above can be rewritten in terms of the co-channel reuse ratio Q,
as
• For N = 7, the co-channel reuse ratio Q is 4.6, and the worst-case S/I is
approximated as 49.56 (17 dB).
• Hence for a seven-cell cluster, the S/I ratio is slightly less than 18 dB for the
worst case. To design the cellular system for proper performance in the worst
case, it would be necessary to increase N to the next largest size is found to be 12
(corresponding to i = j = 2).
• significant decrease in capacity, since 12-cell reuse offers a spectrum utilization
of 1/12 within each cell, whereas seven-cell reuse offers a spectrum utilization of
1/7.
• In practice, a capacity reduction of 7/12 would not be tolerable to accommodate
for the worst-case situation which rarely occurs.
• From the above discussion, it is clear that co-channel interference determines
link performance, which in turn dictates the frequency reuse plan and the overall
capacity of cellular systems.
If a signal-to-interference ratio of 15 dB is required for satisfactory forward channel
performance of a cellular system, what is the frequency reuse factor and cluster size that should
be used for maximum capacity if the path loss exponent is (a) n = 4, (b) n = 3? Assume that
there are six cochannel cells in the first tier, and all of them are at the same distance from the
mobile. Use suitable approximations.
Solution
(a) n = 4
First, let us consider a seven-cell reuse pattern.
co-channel reuse ratio D/R = 4.583.
signal-to-noise interference ratio is given by S/I = (1/6) × (4.583)4 = 75.3 = 18.66 dB
Since this is greater than the minimum required S/I, N = 7 can be used.
(b) n = 3
First, let us consider a seven-cell reuse pattern.
the signal-to-interference ratio is given by S/I = (1/6) × (4.583)3 = 16.04 = 12.05 dB
Since this is less than the minimum required S/I, we need to use a larger N.
the next possible value of N is 12, (i = j = 2).
The corresponding co-channel ratio is given by D/R = 6.0
Using Equation (3.3), the signal-to-interference ratio is given by S/I = (1/6) × (6)3 = 36 = 15.56 dB
Since this is greater than the minimum required S/I, N = 12 is used.