RM
RM
Answer:
When choosing a data collection strategy, you should consider:
What you need to know (numbers or stories).
Where the data is located (environment, files, people).
The resources and time you have.
How complex the data is.
How often you need to collect the data.
How you plan to analyze the data.
13. What should you consider when choosing a data collection tool?
Answer:
When choosing a data collection tool, consider:
The evaluation question you need to answer.
The type of data you need (quantitative or qualitative).
The resources and time available.
The strengths and weaknesses of each tool.
Use more than one tool to get a complete picture.
14. What are the advantages of using diaries and self-reported checklists?
Answer:
Diaries and self-reported checklists are useful because:
They capture real-time information about people’s daily lives.
They can supplement other data collection methods.
They provide a more quantitative approach than just narratives.
Example:
1. Age Group?
o Under 18
o 18-30
o 31-45
o 46-60
o Over 60
2. How often do you use public transport?
o Daily
o Weekly
o Monthly
o Rarely
o Never
3. Rate your satisfaction (1 = Very dissatisfied, 5 = Very
satisfied):
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
4. What improvements would you suggest?
(Write your answer here)
Q1: What is supervision in the context of research?
A1: Supervision is when a senior person (like a professor) guides and
oversees the work of a junior researcher, such as a postgraduate student.
It’s a partnership where the supervisor helps the student complete their
research successfully.
Answer:
The supervisor has several important responsibilities to guide and support
the researcher:
1. Regular Meetings: The supervisor should agree on a schedule of
regular meetings with the researcher, following the school’s policy
and the researcher’s needs.
2. Accessibility: The supervisor should be available for advice and
support when the researcher needs help outside of scheduled
meetings.
3. Guidance: The supervisor provides guidance on the research
process, including planning, literature review, and expected
standards.
4. Feedback: The supervisor should request written work from the
researcher and provide constructive feedback in a reasonable time.
5. Training: The supervisor ensures the researcher is trained in
ethical, legal, and other research conventions.
6. Awareness of Policies: The supervisor makes sure the researcher
knows about university policies, such as intellectual property, health
and safety, and equal opportunities.
7. Support for Presentations: The supervisor arranges for the
researcher to present their work in seminars and prepares them for
oral exams.
8. Monitoring Progress: The supervisor keeps an eye on the
researcher’s progress and helps them avoid common pitfalls.
Answer:
The researcher also has important responsibilities to ensure the success
of their project:
1. Regular Contact: The researcher should maintain regular contact
with the supervisor and discuss the type of guidance they need.
2. Raising Issues: The researcher should take the initiative to raise
any problems or difficulties, no matter how small they seem.
3. Safety: The researcher must ensure they are competent in any
research techniques they use and follow safety guidelines.
4. Planning: The researcher should plan a project that is achievable
within the given time frame and follow the agreed schedule.
5. Progress: The researcher should maintain progress according to
the stages agreed with the supervisor and submit written work on
time for feedback.
6. Thesis Submission: The researcher decides when to submit the
thesis, but should consider the supervisor’s advice and university
requirements.
7. Personal Development: The researcher is responsible for their
own personal and professional development, agreeing on
development needs with the supervisor.
8. Awareness of Policies: The researcher should be familiar with
university regulations and policies that affect their research.
Answer:
To manage the supervisor effectively, the researcher should:
1. Discuss Key Issues Early: Talk about important topics like
authorship, research ethics, and intellectual property at the start of
the project.
2. Be Proactive: Arrange regular formal meetings with the supervisor.
3. Prepare for Meetings: Send an agenda to the supervisor in
advance and prepare work (e.g., reading lists, data, drafts) to focus
the discussion.
4. Accept Feedback: Be open to receiving feedback and criticism,
and use it to improve your work.
5. Summarize Meetings: After each meeting, summarize the
discussion and send a copy to the supervisor to avoid
misunderstandings.
6. Deal with Problems Early: If any issues arise (technical, resource-
related, or with supervision), address them as soon as possible.
Question 4: What should a researcher do if there are problems
with the supervisor?
Answer:
If problems arise, the researcher should:
1. Talk to the Supervisor: First, discuss the issue directly with the
supervisor.
2. Involve Others: If the problem persists, speak to the second
supervisor or the department’s doctoral program director.
3. Escalate: If the issue is still unresolved, approach the head of the
department.
4. Change Supervisor: If all else fails, the researcher can agree to
change supervisors.
Answer:
A good relationship is built on:
1. Mutual Respect: Both the supervisor and researcher should
respect each other’s roles and contributions.
2. Clear Expectations: Both parties should understand what is
expected from each other.
3. Shared Commitment: Both should be committed to the goal of
completing the research successfully.
4. Open Communication: Regular, honest communication helps
prevent misunderstandings and conflicts.
1. What is plagiarism?
Answer:
Plagiarism is when you use someone else's words, ideas, or work and pretend it’s
your own. It’s like stealing someone’s homework, copying a friend’s answers, or
taking a picture from the internet without saying where you got it. Even if you
change a few words, it’s still plagiarism if you don’t give credit to the original
person who created it.
Answer:
The two types of plagiarism are:
Intentional plagiarism: This includes
copying a friend’s work
buying or borrowing papers
cutting and pasting text from electronic sources without
documentation
media “borrowing” without documentation.
Unintentional plagiarism: This includes
careless paraphrasing
poor documentation
excessive quoting
failure to use your own “voice.”
Answer:
Plagiarism is considered a serious offense because:
It is theft of intellectual property.
It is a form of cheating.
It can result in failing grades, disciplinary referrals, or
even removal from organizations like the National Honor
Society.
It can damage reputations, as seen in cases involving prominent
historians, politicians, and journalists.
4. What are some real-life consequences of plagiarism?
Answer:
Real-life consequences of plagiarism include:
Damaged reputations: For example, historians Stephen Ambrose
and Doris Kearns Goodwin faced reputational damage for
plagiarism.
Career loss: Boston Globe journalist Mike Barnicle was forced to
resign for plagiarism.
Academic consequences: At the University of Virginia, 45
students were dismissed, and 3 graduate degrees were revoked due
to plagiarism.
Political fallout: Senator Joseph Biden dropped his 1987
presidential campaign after being accused of plagiarism.
Answer:
No, you do not need to cite everything. You do not need to document:
Facts that are widely known (common knowledge), such as "John
Adams was the second president of the United States."
Your own experiences, observations, or reactions.
Results of original research (e.g., from science experiments).
Answer:
Quoting: Using the exact words of an author, copied directly from a
source. Quotations must be cited and enclosed in quotation marks.
Paraphrasing: Rephrasing the words of an author in your own
words. Paraphrased material must still be cited.
Summarizing: Putting the main ideas of one or several writers into
your own words, including only the main points. Summaries are
shorter than the original and must also be attributed to the original
source.
Answer:
Common excuses for plagiarism include:
“It’s okay if I don’t get caught!”
“I was too busy to write that paper!”
“My teachers expect too much!”
“I’ve got to get into a good university!”
“My parents expect ‘A’s!”
“This assignment was boring!”
“Everyone does it!”
Answer:
To avoid plagiarism, you can use the following strategies:
Quoting: Use the exact words of the author and cite the source.
Paraphrasing: Rephrase the author’s ideas in your own words and
cite the source.
Summarizing: Condense the main ideas of a source into your own
words and cite the source.
Always ensure that your own voice is heard in your work and that
you properly attribute any borrowed ideas or words.
Answer:
Incorrect paraphrasing, even if the source is cited, can still be considered
plagiarism. This happens when:
Too many words or phrases from the original source are used.
The structure and order of ideas remain too similar to the original.
To avoid this, you must thoroughly rephrase the ideas in your own
words and ensure the citation is accurate.
3. Submit it to a journal.
1. What is Research?
o Answer: Research is a systematic way to solve problems. It
has five key characteristics: it is systematic (follows a
process), logical (uses reasoning), empirical (based on
evidence), reductive (generalizes findings), and replicable
(can be repeated using the same methods).
11. What is the difference between APA and MLA citation styles?
Answer:
o APA (American Psychological Association) is used in social sciences. It
includes the author’s name and year of publication (e.g., Smith, 2020).
o MLA (Modern Language Association) is used in humanities. It includes the
author’s name and page number (e.g., Smith 45).
6. What should a PhD student do to have a good relationship with their supervisor?
Answer: The student should set timelines, prepare for meetings, ask questions, and be
clear about what is expected. They should also be enthusiastic about their work,
accept criticism, and avoid personal conflicts.
10. What is the most important component of success in the PhD student-supervisor
relationship?
Answer: The most important components are communication, hard work,
and transparency. Both the student and supervisor need to work together, respect
each other, and be honest.
14. What is the ideal PhD supervisor like from a student’s perspective?
Answer: The ideal supervisor is knowledgeable, passionate about mentoring, and
cares about the student’s well-being. They should also encourage independent
thinking and help the student grow professionally.
6. What should a PhD student do to have a good relationship with their supervisor?
Answer: The student should set timelines, prepare for meetings, ask questions, and be
clear about what is expected. They should also be enthusiastic about their work,
accept criticism, and avoid personal conflicts.
10. What is the most important component of success in the PhD student-supervisor
relationship?
Answer: The most important components are communication, hard work,
and transparency. Both the student and supervisor need to work together, respect
each other, and be honest.
14. What is the ideal PhD supervisor like from a student’s perspective?
Answer: The ideal supervisor is knowledgeable, passionate about mentoring, and
cares about the student’s well-being. They should also encourage independent
thinking and help the student grow professionally.
15. What is the importance of mutual respect in the supervisor-student relationship?
Answer: Mutual respect is crucial because it creates a positive and productive
environment. Both the student and supervisor need to value each other’s contributions
and work together effectively.
Mids:
What is Research?
Answer: Research is a systematic way of finding answers to questions. It involves
collecting, analyzing, and interpreting information to solve problems or create new
knowledge. It must be unbiased, objective, and based on valid and reliable methods.
9. What is a Hypothesis?
Answer: A hypothesis is an educated guess or assumption about a relationship
between variables. It is tested through research to see if it is true, partially true, or
false.