The document discusses the flow characteristics over cylinders and spheres, highlighting the transition from laminar to turbulent flow and its impact on drag coefficients (CD) across various Reynolds numbers (Re). It explains vortex shedding, its frequency, and methods to mitigate vibrations caused by vortex shedding, such as using helical strakes and Stockbridge dampers. Additionally, it covers the principles of lift generation in aerofoils, the effects of wing design on performance, and the Magnus effect related to spinning objects in fluid flow.
The document discusses the flow characteristics over cylinders and spheres, highlighting the transition from laminar to turbulent flow and its impact on drag coefficients (CD) across various Reynolds numbers (Re). It explains vortex shedding, its frequency, and methods to mitigate vibrations caused by vortex shedding, such as using helical strakes and Stockbridge dampers. Additionally, it covers the principles of lift generation in aerofoils, the effects of wing design on performance, and the Magnus effect related to spinning objects in fluid flow.
Rounded objects like spheres and cylinders show a distinct dip in
the CD where 105 > Re < 106 . This is where the change occurs from laminar to turbulent boundary layer and the turbulent boundary layer is able to cling more effectively to the object – and therefore reduce the width of the wake (thus reducing the pressure drag). B.L. changes from (Fig 11-34, Cengel) laminar to turbulent For Re < 1, Stokes (creeping) flow, CD sphere = 24/Re, no flow separation. At Re = 10 separation starts occurring. At Re = 90 cylinders start vortex shedding (spheres don’t shed vortices). Up until Re 103 the CD steadily decreases (while drag increases!). Cylinders can shed × 105 vortices up until Re = 2× Fig 11-33 Cylinder, Re = 2×103, vortex shedding Source: Meyer Frequency of Vortex Shedding The frequency of vortex shedding f is given by the Strouhal equation, where d is cylinder diameter and V is fluid velocity fd 19,7 5 Str = = 0,198 1 − 250 < Re < 2 × 10 V Re In engineering design, it is important to identify if vortex shedding will happen and whether the frequency of vortex shedding is a harmonic (an exact multiple or fraction) of the natural frequency of the object. If it is, the object may start to vibrate at certain flow rates – which could cause damage. See the Tacoma Narrows Bridge video. Vortex shedding as winds pass Heard Island (bottom left) in the southern Indian Ocean resulted in this Kármán vortex street in the clouds. Helical Strake – A “Stockbridge Damper” is used to reduce used to reduce effect vortex shedding vibrations in cables. Vibrations of vortex shedding. in the cable cause the symmetrically-placed For maximum masses at its ends to oscillate. Careful choice of effectiveness each fin the mass of the blocks, and the stiffness and length or strake should have of the damper cable matches the mechanical a height of about 10 impedance of the damper to that of the line, and percent of the greatly reduces oscillation of the main cable. cylinder diameter and a pitch for each fin of approximately 5 times the cylinder diameter. In the range 103 > Re < 105, CD remains roughly constant. Boundary layer is laminar and a wide wake is formed. Re = 15 000, wide wake In the range 105 > Re < 106 CD is suddenly reduced. Boundary layer A narrow wake, Re = 30 000 but boundary flow changes from laminar to layer has been tripped. This type of wake is usually formed where 105 > Re < 106 turbulent and a narrow wake is formed. Note: Streamlined objects experience a sudden increase in CD when the boundary layer changes from laminar to turbulent because most of the drag is generated by skin friction and a turbulent b.l generates more skin friction drag than a laminar b.l. Effect of Surface roughness Remember that golf ball? A golf ball reaches a maximum velocity of about 150m/s. This means that the Re of a golf ball reaches a maximum of about 4×105. The dimples reduce the CD at the expected operating range of Re. Drag coefficients for infinite and finite cylinders To calculate drag force of spheres and infinite cylinders (very long cylinders, or if there is no flow around the ends of the cylinder), calculate the Re first and then use the CD vs Re graphs (Fig 11-34, Cengel) to obtain the CD. For finite (short) cylinders with flow around both ends, first calculate the L/D ratio and then multiply the CD∞ by the CD/CD∞ ratio from Table 8.1 (slide after next). For finite cylinders with flow around one end, first double the length of the cylinder, then calculate the L/D ratio and then multiply the CD∞ by the CD/CD∞ ratio from Table 8.1 (slide after next). Figure 11.34 (Cengel) – Cd for sphere and infinite, smooth cylinder long B.L. changes from laminar to turbulent Terminal velocity of a sphere in any fluid When an object falls freely in a fluid (water, oil, hydrogen, air…) three forces act on it: – Weight (W) due to gravity (acting downwards) = mg – Buoyancy (B) due to displaced fluid (upwards) = ρfluidgV (V is volume of object) D B – Drag force (D) (upwards) = ½CDρAv2 (v is terminal velocity of object) Solve for terminal velocity by assuming v, calculating Re, getting CD from Fig 11-34, solving for a new v from equation: mg = ρfluidgV + ½CDρAv2 W Then repeat the process using the new v to calculate Re. Continued on next page… To simplify this equation even further, volume of a sphere is given by: d3 d3 d3 V = 43 πr 3 = 43 π =π ∴ m = ρ Sπ 8 6 6 πd 2 also A = 4 d3 d3 1 πd 2 2 ∴ρ πS g = ρg π + C ρ 2 D v 6 6 4 d3 πg ( ρ S − ρ ) 4 gd ( ρ − ρ ) 4 gd ρ ∴v = 6 = S = S − 1 πd 2 3CD ρ 3CD ρ 1 2 CD ρ 4 Terminal velocity of a sphere in air. When an object falls freely in the atmosphere (air) the buoyancy force is relatively small and is sometimes ignored. In this simplified case, just two forces are considered: – Weight (W) due to gravity (acting downwards) = mg – Drag force (D) (upwards) = ½CDρAv2 (v is terminal velocity of object) D Where mg = ½CDρAv2 Rearranging gives: v = [2mg/(CD ρA)]½ Solve using the same process as the previous slide. Note: Because of buoyancy, accurate mass measurement requires correction for the density of the object being measured relative to the comparison mass-piece density (8000kg/m3). For W general engineering activities this is usually also ignored. For completeness, we will always include the density of air (just use the previous slide only). Aerofoils Theories of Lift: Pressure Theory Lift is generated entirely from pressure forces. The shape of an aerofoil makes fluid travel faster over the upper surface. Pressure is low at locations where the flow velocity is high (where streamlines are close together – think Bernoulli) Pressure is high at locations where velocity is low (where streamlines are far apart – think Bernoulli) Lift is therefore generated by positive pressure under the wing and negative pressure (suction) above the wing. Theories of Lift: Circulation Theory (also explains lift) An anti-clockwise vortex is always created downwind of the trailing edge (which can be seen in practice). A balancing clockwise circulation around the wing explains the streamlines separating at the tip of the trailing edge. Above the wing, clockwise circulation speeds up the flow (and makes low pressure). Below the wing, clockwise circulation slows down the flow (and makes high pressure). Trailing edge Unbalanced circulation (doesn’t Balanced circulation (explains flow occur under normal lift conditions) and lift under normal lift conditions) Lift to Drag Ratio It is useful to compare CL/CD at various angles of attack at a particular velocity. For fuel efficient flight, the wings of aircraft are set at the angle of attack at the maximum CL/CD ratio at the design cruising speed. During take-off and landing, the angle of attack is adjusted for maximum lift at low speed. Stalling happens shortly after CL/CD max where the CL/CD ratio drops rapidly. CL/CD max can also be found from a CL vs CD graph. See CLvs CD graph (top left). 1 CL vs CD CL vs α 2 CL CL CL/CD max Most efficient flight CL max at αcritical. Stall happens at higher α (considering wing Corresponding CL and angles (considering wing aerodynamics only). aerodynamics only) α for most efficient . flight (considering wing aerodynamics only) To find α, CL and CD at max CL/CD, draw line 1, 3 then 2, then 3, then 4. CD α CD vs α Check this max CL/CD on the graphs alongside. Pitching moment vs CD Corresponding CD for most efficient flight alpha. Not (considering wing aerodynamics only) covered in this course. 4 Go and have a look at: http://airfoiltools.com/ α Minimum flight velocity In steady flight, with horizontal engine thrust, and if buoyancy is ignored, the weight of an aircraft is balanced by the lift force, therefore, the minimum flight velocity can be determined. Note that the minimum flight velocity occurs at the maximum coefficient of lift. 2 W = FL = 12 CL max ρAVmin 2W ∴ Vmin = ρACL max Slots and extendable flaps on wings increases A and CL. Extended flaps on aircraft Retracted flaps allow drag to wings allow the lift be reduced at high speed coefficient to be improved for during cruising. low speeds during takeoff . This also increases the planform area of the wing. Slots in a wing prevent the separation of the boundary layer from the upper surface of the wing, prevent “stall” and improve lift coefficient. The effect of slotted flaps on CL and CD is shown in Fig 11-45. Notice that CL is increased but CD is also increased. Wing Tip Vortices Flow around the tips of wings causes wing tip vortices. This causes flow over the wing to be less efficient near the wing tips A wing tip vortex can be seen in this photo of a light aircraft flying under a cloud of smoke. Induced Drag (CDi) Wing tip vortices cause a downwash velocity component, a change in the effective angle of attack and induced drag (CDi) The drag of an ‘infinite’ wing CD∞ can be adjusted for induced drag using: [( )] C D = C D∞ + C Di = C D∞ + C L2 / π b 2 A = C D∞ + C L2 /[π ( AR )] where CL is the lift coefficient, b is the wing span, A is the wing plan area (b × c), and AR is the aspect ratio: span b AR = = chord c See Sayers Fig 12.35 note “Induced Drag” for derivation and vector diagram. Also, be sure to work through Example 12.6 (Induced drag) – also on the hand-out provided in class. A vulture with fanned out wing tip feathers to reduce the effect of wing tip vortices. Endplates reduce the effect of wing tip vortices Source: Sayers AT, Fluid Mechanics – An Introduction The solution was done on the board in class. Lift Generated by Spinning A spinning object in a flowing fluid generates lift. This is called the Magnus effect. Examples where this effect is clearly visible are table tennis (top spin so that the ball curves downwards towards the table) and soccer (where the ball is curved into the goals from a “corner”). Note which way the ball spins, the direction of fluid flow and which way the ball moves. The lift and drag coefficients of a rotating sphere at Re = 6×104 are shown. Lift FL and drag FD can be calculated using the normal equations as shown. Note that units of ω are rad/s.