Experimental_Optimization_of_Process_for
Experimental_Optimization_of_Process_for
Centurion University of Technology and Management, Odisha, India, Department of Chemistry, R. Sitapur,
Upalada, Gajapati, odisha, PIN: 761211, India, Mobile Number: 09437132916;
2Prof. (Dr.) R. K. Singh, Department of Chemical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela (Odisha),
India, PIN: 769008, Phone: 91 661 2462260 (O), 91 661 2463260 (R), 91 9861285425 (Mob), Fax: 0661-2472926, 0661-
2471169
*1 [email protected]; [email protected]
74
Advances in Energy Engineering (AEE) Volume 1 Issue 3, July 2013 www.seipub.org/aee
over different type of zeolite catalysts such as BEA, mesoporous silica catalyst (FSM) in a semi batch
ZSM-5 and MOR with different surface areas, pore reactor without external gas flow[Uddin, Koizumi,
structures, acidities and Si/Al molar ratios and Murata, and Sakata, 1997, Uddin, Sakata, Muto,
calculated the apparent activation energies of the Shiragam, Koizumi and Kanada, 1998]. Catalytic
processes by the Kissinger equation[Durmus, NaciKoc, cracking of polypropylene has been carried out in a
Selda, Pozan, and Kasgoz, 2005]. The performance semi batch stirred reactor using spent equilibrium
of several differently treated clinoptilolite zeolites catalyst from FCC units, large pore zeolites as well as
(dealuminatedclinoptilolite catalysts) in the degradation amorphous and ordered silica–alumina in order to
of polypropylene was investigated in a semi-batch study extensively the influence of pore size (micro and
reactor at 400°C [Kim, Kim, Yoon, Park, and Woo, meso), crystallite size and the number and strength of
2002]. The effects of different zeolites as H-Y, the active acid sites [Salvador, Cardona and Corma.
Na-Y, H-mordenite and Na-mordenite on the 2000].
catalytic degradation of polypropylene was studied
usingthermogravimetry under nitrogen flow [Zhao, Lin et al. used a laboratory catalytic fluidised-bed
Hasegawa, Fujita, Yoshii, Sasaki, and Makuuchi, 1996]. reactor to obtain a range of volatile hydrocarbons by
The catalytic cracking of polypropylene was carried degradation of polypropylene in the temperature
out by silica–alumina and H-ZSM-5 at temperatures range 290-430°C using different zeolitic and non
between 350°C and 420°C and sulfated zirconia at zeolitic catalysts such as HZSM-5, HMOR and HUSY,
temperatures below 300°C, and also by means of MCM-41 and SAHA and found product streams
thermogravimetry under helium flow[Negelein, Lin varied markedly depending on catalysts type and
and White, 1998]. The catalytic degradation of structure[Lin and Yen, 2005]. The thermogravimetric
polypropylene under vacuum in a semi batch reactor, study of the thermal and catalytic decomposition (with
using catalysts as Al2O3, SiO2, SiO2–Al2O3, and Na-Y, MCM-41, ZSM-5 and an FCC as a catalyst) of
H-Y and REY zeolites, at temperatures between 200°C polypropylene showedthat the addition of MCM-41
and 600°C was reported [Audisio, Silvani, Beltrame, produceda remarkable decrease of almost 110°C in
and Carniti, 1884]. Meanwhile, Sakata et al. studied the temperature of maximum decomposition rate
the catalytic cracking of polypropylene with silica– [Marcilla, Go´ mez, Reyes-Labarta and Giner, 2003].
alumina catalyst at 380°C in a semi batch reactor Zhao et al. found that the degradation temperature of
without external gas flow[Sakata, Uddin, Koizumi, polypropylene strongly depended on the type of
and Murata, 1996]. Ishihara et al. investigated the zeolite used and the amount added and one type of
catalytic degradation of polypropylene by silica– HY zeolite (320HOA) was shown to be a very effective
alumina at temperatures between 180°C and 300°C in catalyst [Zhao, Hasegawa, Fujita, Yshii and Sasaki,
a semi batch reactor under a nitrogen flow[Ishihara, 1996]. The catalytic degradation of polypropylene has
Nanbu, Iwata, Ikemura, and Takesue, 1989]. been investigated using solid acid catalysts, such as
Aguado et al. have studied the catalytic cracking of silica-alumina and zeolites (HZSM-5, natural zeolite,
LDPE, HDPE and polypropylene in a semi batch Mordenite etc.), in the range of 350-450°C [Hwang,
reactor at 400°C under a nitrogen flow using MCM-41, Choi, Kim, Park and Woo, 1998].
H-ZSM-5 zeolite and silica–alumina as solid acid Achilias et al. carried out the catalytic pyrolysis of low-
catalysts[Aguado, Serrano, Romero, and Escola. density polyethylene(LDPE), high-density polyethylene
1996,Aguado, Sotelo, Serrano, Calles and Escola, 1997]. (HDPE) and polypropylene (PP) in a laboratory fixed
Lin et al. have investigated the catalytic cracking of bed reactor with an FCC catalyst [Achilias, Roupakias,
HDPE and polypropylene in a fluidized bed reactor Megalokonomos, Lappas and Antonakou, 2007].
using H-ZSM-5, H-USY, H-mordenite, silica–alumina
Pyrolysis of polyolefin wastes (PP and PE fractions)
and MCM-41, with nitrogen as fluidizing gas[Lin,
was carried out in a fluidized bed reactor equipped
Sharratt, Garforth, and Dwyer,1998]. Mordi et al. have
with a char removal system, under various reaction
reported the catalytic degradation of LDPE and PP at
conditions (temperature, feed rate, and fluidizing
350°C in a batch reactor under vacuum, using zeolite
medium [Jung, Cho, Kang and Kim,.2010].
catalysts as H-ZSM-5, H-Theta-1 and H-mordenite
[Mordi, Fields, and Dwyer, 1994, Mordi, Fields,and Degradations of polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene
Dwyer,1992]. Uddin et al. have studied the catalytic (PE) over pure hexagonal mesoporous silica and
cracking of PE and PP at 430°C and 380°C with silica– aluminum-containing hexagonal mesoporous silica
alumina, H-ZSM-5, silicalite and a non-acidic catalysts were studied in a fixed bed catalytic reactor
75
www.seipub.org/aee Advances in Energy Engineering (AEE) Volume 1 Issue 3, July 2013
76
Advances in Energy Engineering (AEE) Volume 1 Issue 3, July 2013 www.seipub.org/aee
Weight(%)
up to the desired temperature. The condensable liquid
products were collected through the condenser and 40
77
www.seipub.org/aee Advances in Energy Engineering (AEE) Volume 1 Issue 3, July 2013
Thermal pyrolysis
100 Catalytic pyrolysis
100
Oil PP:catalyst = 3:1
Residue 90
Gas
80
80
70
60
Wt % of Liquid
60
weight %
50
40
40
30
20
20
10
0 0
375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 400 425 450 475 500 525 550
0
Temperature ( C) Temperature (0C)
FIG. 3 EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON PRODUCT FIG. 4b EFFECT OF CATALYST ON OIL YIELD AT DIFFERENT
DISTRIBUTION OF WASTE POLYPROPYLENE TEMPERATURE
2) Effect of catalyst From Figure 5a, it is observed that the reaction time of
the pyrolysis reaction also decreased with addition of
The thermal decomposition of polypropylene was
catalyst. Figure 5b provides a comparison of the rate of
carried out in presence of kaolin as catalyst with
production of oil in thermal and catalytic pyrolysis. In
different polypropylene to catalyst ratio. Reaction thermal pyrolysis, there was gradual increase in oil
time decreased and oil yield increased with production with time. Whereas there was sharp increase
incrementin catalyst amount (Figure 4a). The highest in oil yield with time observed in presence of the catalyst.
yield of oil (87.5wt.%) was obtained at the ratio of
plastics to catalyst 3:1 at 500°C. The effect of catalyst
Plastic:Catalyst = 3:1 Thermal Reaction
was not significant at the ratio of polymer to catalyst 500 Kaoline catalysed reaction
20:1and it is almost negligible at 40:1. Figure 4b
400
shows the effect of presence of catalyst on oil yield at
Reaction time (Minutes)
which facilitated the cracking reaction. FIG. 5a EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE AND CATALYST ON
REACTION TIME
100
Temperature = 5000C Reaction time
Wt.% of oil 20
Reaction time in minute/Wt. % of Liquid
18
Volume of condensable fraction (ml)
80 16
14
12
10 Thermal
60
Kaoline catalysed
8
4
40 2
2:1 3:1 4:1 6:1 10:1 20:1 40:1 Thermal
Plastic:catalyst 0
40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Reaction time (minutes)
FIG. 4a EFFECT OF PLASTIC: CATALYST RATIO ON THE
REACTION TIME AND OIL YIELD OF PYROLYSIS OF
POLYPROPYLENE FIG. 5b EFFECT OF CATALYST ON RATE OF PRODUCTION OF OIL
78
Advances in Energy Engineering (AEE) Volume 1 Issue 3, July 2013 www.seipub.org/aee
A comparison of product distribution and basic physical observed that the yield and quality of liquid oil
properties of the oil obtained from thermal and catalytic product remain almost same up to four times repeated
pyrolysis of waste polypropylene is summarized in the use of the catalyst and yield decreased at 5th reuse.
Table 1. The density and viscosity of the oil obtained in The reaction time of the reaction increased gradually
the two processes show a remarkabledifference. for every repeated use.
The decrease in the catalytic activity may be due to the
Reusability of Catalyst
deposition of carbon and other plastics impurities over
The activity of kaolin catalyst was studied by re-using the surface. The SEM EDX (Figure 6 a b c d) of the
it repeatedly in the degradation of polypropylene and catalyst sample clearly distinguishes the deposition of
the results are summarized in the Table 2. It is carbon over the surface of used catalyst.
TABLE 1 PYROLYSIS OF POLYPROPYLENE IN OPTIMUM CONDITION
TABLE 2 PRODUCT DISTRIBUTION, REACTION TIME AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF OIL OBTAINED IN CATALYTIC PYROLYSIS WITH FEED- KP: WP-1:3 AT
TEMPERATURE- 500 °C
Weight of different fractions in weight % Residence time in Specific gravity of oil @ Viscosity of oil
No of times re-used
Oil Gas Solid residue minutes 15 °C/15 °C at 30°C in Cst
Fresh 89.5 8.9 1.6 44 0.7777 2.27
1st time 87.5 10.6 1.9 58 0.7776 2.27
2nd time 87.5 10.4 2.1 64 0.7645 2.27
3rd time 88 10.25 1.75 68 0.7641 2.26
4th time 88 10.4 1.6 68 0.7638 2.26
5th time 84 14.25 1.75 73 0.7630 2.24
Regenerated catalyst 88 10.25 1.75 45 0.7732 2.26
79
www.seipub.org/aee Advances in Energy Engineering (AEE) Volume 1 Issue 3, July 2013
120
100
80
%T
60
40
20
Wavelength (cm-1)
The kaolin after usefor 5th run degradation was Characterization of Liquid Products
regenerated by calcinating it inside a muffle furnace
at 750°C for one hour. The catalytic activity of The oil sample was characterized using FTIR for
regenerated catalyst was found to be almost same as functional group composition, GC-MS for detail
that of the fresh kaolin. When the used catalysts were composition and fuel properties to know its usability
regenerated at high temperature, the deposited carbon as an engine fuel. Figure 7 indicates the FTIR of
burnt off and surface of catalyst become free of all thermal and catalytic pyrolysed oil at 500°C.The
depositions. important assignments were summarized in Table 3.
80
Advances in Energy Engineering (AEE) Volume 1 Issue 3, July 2013 www.seipub.org/aee
TABLE 4 GC-MS COMPOSITION OF OIL OBTAINED BY THE CATALYTIC PYROLYSIS OF POLYPROPYLENE AT 5000C
The GC-MS of the oil obtained in thermal and kaolin alcohol, ketone, etc. are also found in the oil, which
catalytic pyrolysis reaction at 500°C are shown in Figure 8. may be due to oxidative degradation of polypropylene
in presence of limited quantity of oxygen inside the
Different components present in the oil obtained by
reactor as the reaction is not carried out in inert
comparing NIST library are summarized in the Table 4.
atmosphere.
This result indicates the presence of different
hydrocarbons mostly alkanes and alkenes in the oil. In Hayashi J et al. reportedthatpolypropylene is more
addition, some oxygenated compounds such as susceptible to oxidation than others because it contains
81
www.seipub.org/aee Advances in Energy Engineering (AEE) Volume 1 Issue 3, July 2013
TABLE 5 FUEL PROPERTIES OF THE OIL OBTAINED AT 500 °C OBTAINED FROM KAOLIN CATALYSED PYROLYSIS
FIG. 8 GC-MS OF OIL OBTAINED IN THE CATALYTIC PYROLYSIS WITH 1:3 CATALYST TO POLYPROPYLENE FEED AT 500 °C
82
Advances in Energy Engineering (AEE) Volume 1 Issue 3, July 2013 www.seipub.org/aee
tertiary carbons and forms peroxide in the chemical Aguado, J., Serrano, D.P., Romero, M.D., Escola, J.M.,
form of –C–O–O–H in presence of oxygen even at “Catalytic conversion of polyethylene into fuels over
150°C. Peroxides are further decomposed to more
mesoporous MCM-41”, Chemical Communications Vol.
stable oxygen-containing groups such as hydroxyl and
carbonyl groups [Hayash, Nakahara, and Kusakabe, 6, 1996, PP. 725-732.
Morooka, 1998]. Aguado, J., Sotelo, J., Serrano, D.P., Calles, J.A.,
Escola,J.M.,“Catalytic conversion of polyolefins into
All the fuel properties of the oil were tested by
prescribed IS methods and the results are summarized liquid fuels over MCM-41: Comparision with ZSM-5 and
in Table 5. amorphous SiO2-Al2O3”, Energy and Fuels, Vol.11, 1997,
From the distillation report of the oil, it was observed PP. 1225-1232.
that the boiling point range of the oil is 68-346°C using Audisio, G., Silvani, A., Beltrame, P.L., Carniti,P.,“Catalytic
kaolin, which inferedthe presence of mixture of thermal degradation of polymers : Degradation of
different oil components such as gasoline, kerosene polypropylene”, Journal of Analytical and Applied
and diesel in the oil. Again, 30% oil recovery occuredat
Pyrolysis, Vol.7, 1984, PP. 83-90.
160°C, which was the boiling range of gasoline, while
Chaianansutcharit, S., Katsutath, R., Chaisuwan, A., Bhaskar,
the rest must be in the range of kerosene and diesel.
All the other fuel properties of the oil obtained using T., Nigo, A., Muto,A.,“Catalytic degradation of
the catalyst was almost similar and comparable to that polyolefins over hexagonal mesoporous silica: Effect of
of petro fuels. Based onthis result, it can be concluded aluminum addition”, Journal of Analytical and Applied
that the oil produced in the catalytic pyrolysis can be Pyrolysis, Vol.80, 2007, PP. 360-368.
used as a substitute of petro fuels in engine.
Durmus, A.¸ NaciKoc, S.,¸Selda,Pozan, G., Kasgoz, A.,
“Thermal-catalytic degradation kinetics of polypropylene
Conc lusion
over BEA, ZSM-5 and MOR zeolites”, Applied Catalysis
The kaolin is found as an efficient catalyst for the
B, Vol. 61, 2005, PP. 316–322.
conversion of waste polypropylene to gasoline/diesel/
kerosene range chemicals. It increases the oil yield and Hayash, J., Nakahara, J., Kusakabe, K., Morooka, S.,
the rate of pyrolytic reaction. In addition, the quality “Pyrolysis of polypropylene in the presence of oxygen”,
of oil produced from the kaolin catalysed pyrolysis Fuel Processing Technology, Vol.55, No.3, 1998, PP>265-
reaction of polypropylene is better as compared to that 275.
produced from thermal pyrolysis. The maximum oil
Hwang, E.Y., Choi, J.K., Kim, D.H., Park, D.W.,
yield in the catalytic process is 87.5% with 3:1 plastics
Woo,H.C.,“Catalytic degradation of polypropylene i.
to catalyst feed at 500°C. In addition, it can be reused
repeatedly without much affecting the oil quality. Screening of catalysts”, Korean Journal of Chemical
Again, the used catalyst can be regenerated and Engineering, Vol. 15, No.4, 1998, PP. 434-438.
performance of the regenerated catalyst is found that Ishihara, Y., Nanbu, H., Iwata, C., Ikemura, T., Takesue, T.,
same as that of the fresh kaolin. Natural kaolin being “The Catalytic Degradation Reaction of Polypropylene
available abundantly could be a good candidate for its
with Silica–Alumina”, Bulletin of Chemical Society Japan,
commercial application in the degradation of
Vol.62, 1989, PP. 2981-1988.
polypropylene. Further detailed kinetic studies would
be necessary for a better understanding of the Jung, S.H., Cho, M.H., Kang, B.S., Kim,J.S.,“Pyrolysis of a
degradation mechanism and design of catalyst for fraction of waste polypropylene and polyethylene for the
proper uses of degraded products. recovery of BTX aromatics using a fluidized bed reactor”,
Fuel Processing Technology , Vol. 91, 2010, PP. 277–284.
REFEREN CES
Kim, J.R., Kim, Y.A., Yoon, J.H., Park, D.W., Woo, H.C.,
Achilias, D.S., Roupakias, C., Megalokonomos, P., Lappas, “Catalytic degradation of polypropylene: effect of
A.A., Antonakou, E.V., “Chemical recycling of plastic dealumination of clinoptilolite catalyst”, Polymer
wastes made from polyethylene (LDPE and HDPE) and Degradation and Stability, Vol. 75, 2002, PP. 287–294.
polypropylene (PP)”, Journal of Hazardous Materials, Lin, Y.H., Yen, H.Y., Fluidised bed pyrolysis of
Vol.149, 2007, PP. 536–542. polypropylene over cracking catalysts for producing
83
www.seipub.org/aee Advances in Energy Engineering (AEE) Volume 1 Issue 3, July 2013
84