Scribd
Upload
62 views4 pages

UTAUT Model Analysis Using MLR

The reliability analysis of the survey constructs showed high internal consistency, with all scales exceeding the optimal Cronbach Alpha threshold of 0.70. A multiple linear regression indicated that Performance Expectancy and Effort Expectancy significantly predict Behavioral Intentions, explaining approximately 65.2% of the variance. However, Facilitating Conditions had a marginally insignificant effect, and Social Influence did not have a significant impact on Behavioral Intentions.

Uploaded by

Saidul Islam
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
62 views4 pages

UTAUT Model Analysis Using MLR

The reliability analysis of the survey constructs showed high internal consistency, with all scales exceeding the optimal Cronbach Alpha threshold of 0.70. A multiple linear regression indicated that Performance Expectancy and Effort Expectancy significantly predict Behavioral Intentions, explaining approximately 65.2% of the variance. However, Facilitating Conditions had a marginally insignificant effect, and Social Influence did not have a significant impact on Behavioral Intentions.

Uploaded by

Saidul Islam
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Result

Analysis of the Survey Questions


Reliability Analysis
According to Cortina (1993), Cronbach Alpha value greater than 0.70 is the optimal benchmark to
select a construct. The reliability analysis of the research constructs revealed a high internal
consistency across all scales. Performance Expectancy (α = .869), Effort Expectancy (α = .924),
Social Influence (α = .875), Facilitating Conditions (α = .946), and Behavioral Intention (α = .921)
all demonstrated strong reliability, surpassing the optimal threshold of 0.70. These results indicate
that the survey items used for this research to measure the research constructs are consistent and
reliable. Hence, these constructs are carried out in order to investigate the behavioral intention of
the adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies in the domain of maintenance strategies.

Research Model
A multiple linear regression analysis was run to measure the impact of Performance Expectancy,
Effort Expectancy, Social Influence, and Facilitating Conditions on Behavioral Intentions.

The regression model was statistically significant, F (4, 65) = 30.401, p < .001, with a favorable
R2 of .652. The R2 value indicates that approximately 65.2% of the variance in Behavioral Intention
can be explained by the predictors.

The regression coefficients reveal that out of the 4 model predictors: Performance Expectancy (β
= .348, p = .001) and Effort Expectancy (β = .360, p = .003) can significantly predict Behavioral
Intentions. This indicate that higher values in these constructs are associated with stronger
behavioral intentions to adopt new technologies.

However, other predictors: Facilitating Conditions showed a positive but marginally insignificant
effect (β = .147, p = .096), and Social Influence did not yield any significant impact (β = -.010, p
= .915).
Model Summaryb

Adjusted R Std. Error of


Model R R Square Square the Estimate

1 .807a .652 .630 .62757

a. Predictors: (Constant), Facilitating_conditions,


Performance_expectancy, Social_influence, Effort_expectancy

b. Dependent Variable: Behavioral_intentions

Coefficientsa
Unstandardized Standardized Collinearity
Coefficients Coefficients Statistics

Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig. Tolerance VIF

1(Constant) 1.407 .494 2.851.006

Performance expectancy .348 .100 .365 3.478.001 .487 2.054

Effort expectancy .360 .116 .396 3.091.003 .326 3.070

Social influence -.010 .092 -.009 -.107 .915 .713 1.403

Facilitating conditions .147 .087 .176 1.690.096 .491 2.035

a. Dependent Variable: Behavioral_intentions


Reference list
Cortina, J.M. (1993). What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications.
Journal of Applied Psychology, [online] 78(1), pp.98–104. Doi: HTTPs://doi.org/10.1037/0021-
9010.78.1.98.

You might also like