NERC 2024 Q2 Report
NERC 2024 Q2 Report
NERC©2024
Please direct all inquiries, comments, and suggestions on the report to:
The Commissioner
Planning, Research and Strategy Division
Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission
Plot 1387, Cadastral Zone A00
Central Business District
P.M.B 136, Garki, Abuja
Nigeria
NERC website: www.nerc.gov.ng
Contact Centre:
Tel: +234 (09) 462 1400, +234 (09) 462 1410
Email: [email protected]
Table of Contents
1.0 SUMMARY ..................................................................................... viii
2.0 STATE OF THE INDUSTRY .....................................................................2
2.1 Operational Performance ......................................................................2
2.1.1 Available Generation ..................................................................................... 2
2.1.2 Plant Availability Factor .................................................................................. 4
2.1.3 Total Quarterly Generation ............................................................................. 6
2.1.4 Generation Load Factor .................................................................................. 8
2.1.5 Generation Mix ........................................................................................... 10
2.2 Grid Performance ............................................................................. 11
2.2.1 Transmission Loss Factor ............................................................................... 12
2.2.2 Grid Frequency ........................................................................................... 13
2.2.3 Voltage Fluctuation ...................................................................................... 15
2.2.4 System Collapse .......................................................................................... 16
2.3 Commercial Performance .................................................................... 18
2.3.1 Energy offtake performance .......................................................................... 18
2.3.2 Energy Billed and Billing Efficiency................................................................. 20
2.3.3 Revenue and Collection Efficiency.................................................................. 22
2.3.4 Aggregate Technical, Commercial and Collection (ATC&C) Loss ....................... 24
2.3.5 Market Remittance ....................................................................................... 26
3.0 REGULATORY FUNCTIONS................................................................. 34
3.1 Regulations, Orders and Directives ........................................................ 35
3.1.1 Regulations ................................................................................................. 35
3.1.2 Orders ........................................................................................................ 35
3.1.3 Directives .................................................................................................... 41
3.2 Licences Issued or Renewed ................................................................. 41
3.3 Captive Power Generation Permits......................................................... 42
3.4 Mini-grid Permits and Registration Certificates ........................................... 42
3.5 Meter Service Providers/Meter Asset Providers ......................................... 43
3.6 Hearings and Public Consultations ......................................................... 44
3.7 Compliance and Enforcement ............................................................... 45
3.8 Alternative Dispute Resolution .............................................................. 45
4.0 CONSUMER AFFAIRS........................................................................ 48
4.1 Consumer Enlightenment and Stakeholder Engagements .............................. 48
4.2 Metering End-Use Customers ................................................................ 49
4.3 Customer Complaints ......................................................................... 51
4.3.1 NERC-CCU .................................................................................................. 53
4.3.2 DisCo-CCUs................................................................................................. 54
4.3.3 Forum Offices .............................................................................................. 56
4.4 Health and Safety ............................................................................. 58
5.0 Appendix ....................................................................................... 62
List of Tables
Table 1: Plant Availability Factor (%) in 2024/Q1 vs. 2024/Q2 ................................... 5
Table 2: Average Hourly Generation (MWh/h) in 2024/Q1 vs. 2024/Q2 .................... 8
Table 3: System Collapse in 2024/Q2 ..................................................................... 17
Table 4: DisCo energy offtake performance in 2024/Q1 vs. 2024/Q2........................ 20
Table 5: Energy Received and Billing Efficiency by DisCos in 2024/Q1 vs. 2024/Q2 ... 21
Table 6: Revenue Collection Performance (%) of DisCos in 2024/Q1 vs. 2024/Q2 ...... 23
Table 7: ATC&C Loss (%) by DisCos in 2024/Q1 vs. 2024/Q2 .................................. 25
Table 8: Total NBET Invoice and Final Obligation (DRO) of DisCos for 2024/Q2 ......... 28
Table 9: DisCos Remittance Performances to NBET and MO in 2024/Q2 ..................... 31
Table 10: Invoices and Remittances of Other Customers in 2024/Q2........................... 32
Table 11: Reporting Requirements on the Operationalisation of MAF .......................... 40
Table 12: Licences issued by the Commission in 2024/Q2 .......................................... 42
Table 13: Meter Service Providers certified in 2024/Q2 ............................................ 43
Table 14: Hearings conducted by the Commission in 2024/Q2 ................................... 44
Table 15: Compliance and Enforcement Actions of the Commission in 2024/Q2 ........... 45
Table 16: Metering Progress as of 2024/Q2 ............................................................ 49
Table 17: Meter Deployment by DisCos in 2024/Q1 vs. 2024/Q2 ............................. 50
Table 18: Complaints Received by DisCos in 2024/Q1 vs. 2024/Q2 .......................... 54
Table 19: Appeals handled by Forum Offices in 2024/Q2 ......................................... 56
Table 20: Health and Safety (H&S) Reports in 2024/Q1 vs. 2024/Q2 ........................ 58
Table 21: Causes of casualties recorded in 2024/Q2 ................................................ 59
List of Figures
Figure 1: Average Available Capacity (MW) in 2024/Q1 vs. 2024/Q2........................ 3
Figure 2: Average Hourly Generation (MWh/h) in 2024/Q1 vs. 2024/Q2 ................... 7
Figure 3: Load Factor (%) in 2024/Q1 vs. 2024/Q2 ................................................. 10
Figure 4: Electricity Generated by Energy Sources in 2024/Q1 vs. 2024/Q2 .............. 11
Figure 5: Actual Transmission Loss Factor (%) vs. MYTO TLF Target (%) Jan - June 2024 13
Figure 6: Monthly System Frequency from Jan - June 2024 ......................................... 14
Figure 7: Monthly System Voltage (kV) from Jan - June 2024 ..................................... 16
Figure 8: DisCos Remittance Performances to NBET in 2024/Q2 ................................. 29
Figure 9: DisCos Remittance Performances to MO in 2024/Q2 ................................... 30
Figure 10: Category of complaints received at the Commission’s CCU in 2024/Q2 ....... 54
Figure 11: Category of complaints received by DisCos in 2024/Q2 ............................ 55
Figure 12: Category of Complaints Received by Forum Offices in 2024/Q2 ................. 57
Figure 13: Accident Report for 2024/Q2.................................................................. 59
List of Abbreviations
ADR Alternative Dispute Resolution
AEDC Abuja Electricity Distribution Company Plc
ATC&C Aggregate Technical, Commercial & Collection Loss
BEDC Benin Electricity Distribution Company Plc
CAPEX Capital Expenditure
CCU Customers Complaint Unit
CEET Compagnie Energie Electrique du Togo
CTC Competition Transition Charge
DisCos Distribution Companies
DSOs Distribution System Operators
EA Electricity Act
ECR Eligible Customer Regulations
EEDC Enugu Electricity Distribution Company Plc
EKEDC Eko Electricity Distribution Company Plc
EPSRA Electric Power Sector Reform Act
GenCos Generation Companies
GWh Gigawatt hour
IBEDC Ibadan Electricity Distribution Company Plc
IEDN Independent Electricity Distribution Network
IE Ikeja Electric Plc
JED Jos Electricity Distribution Company Plc
KAEDC Kaduna Electricity Distribution Company Plc
KEDCO Kano Electricity Distribution Company Plc
kWh Kilowatt hour
MAP Meter Assets Provider
MDA Ministries, Departments and Agencies
MO Market Operator
MTS MYTO Target Sales
MW Megawatts
MWh Megawatt hour
MYTO Multi-Year Tariff Order
NBET Nigerian Bulk Electricity Trading plc
NERC Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission
NESI Nigerian Electricity Supply Industry
NICE Notices of Intention to Commence Enforcement
NIGELEC Société Nigerienne d’electricite; Nigerien Electricity Society
NIPP National Integrated Power Project
NMMP National Mass Metering Program
PAC Partial Activation of Contract
PCC Partial Contracted Capacity
PHED Port Harcourt Electricity Distribution Company Plc
PP Percentage points
SBEE Société Béninoise d'Energie Electrique
TCN Transmission Company of Nigeria Plc
TLF Transmission Loss Factor
YEDC Yola Electricity Distribution Company Plc
1.0 SUMMARY
Operational Performance
4,700
Average Available Capacity (2024/Q1) 4,249.10MW
4,459
4,500
4,331
Average Available Capacity (MW)
4,300
4,184
4,026
4,100
3,957
3,864
3,900
3,500
Jan-24 Feb-24 Mar-24 Apr-24 May-24 Jun-24
Months
4,600
Average Hourly Generation 2024/Q1 4,069.57MWh/h
4,275
4,400
4,138
Average Hourly Generation (MWh/h)
4,200
3,934
4,000
3,796
3,723
3,800
3,600
3,388
3,400
3,000
Jan-24 Feb-24 Mar-24 Apr-24 May-24 Jun-24
Month
During 2024/Q2, there was one (1) incident of partial collapse on the
national grid. The incident occurred on 15 April 2024. In line with
section 20.1 of the Grid Code, the SO is expected to submit to the
Commission, a detailed report containing the root causes of the
incidents along with mitigation plans to avoid future recurrence.
Commercial Performance
In 2024/Q2, Yola was the only DisCo that recorded a lower ATC&C
(48.04%) than its target (56.00%). The inability of DisCos to achieve
their respective ATC&C targets means that they are not able to recover
the full revenues they require to provide returns to investors and in
some instances – they may not even fully recover the cost of delivering
electricity to the customers. Ultimately, both cases may lead to the
erosion of their long-term financial sustainability.
1
The NBET invoice payable by the DisCos for 2024/Q2 was only ₦343.76 billion because the FGN has taken
responsibility for ~52% (₦380.06 billion) of the total generation costs in the form of subsidies arising from the
freezing of end-use customer tariffs at the rates that became effective in December 2022.
2
It is noteworthy that both local and international bilateral customers made payments during 2024/Q2 for
outstanding MO invoices from previous quarters; the international bilateral customers paid $16.65 million while
the domestic bilateral customers paid ₦1,309.97 million. The details of these payments are contained in
Appendix VII.
Regulatory Functions
3
Hearings are proceedings pursuant to the provisions of the Act through which the Commission seeks additional
information on petitions or any matter filed before it by market participants or consumers in order to make a
final decision.
Consumer Affairs
2,498
2,500 Average Metering rate as at
June 2024 45.43%
Number of Customers (thousand)
2,000
1,500 1,396
1,370
1,244 1,209 1,179
1,069
1,000 926
873 878 882
773 818
747
675
635
502
500 438
Performance 36% 70% 49% 57% 45% 43 % 77% 34% 24% 24% 43% 16%
Investigations have e. Health & Safety: The total number of accidents in 2024/Q2
been launched into was sixty-three (63) which resulted in seventeen (17) injuries
all reported and thirty-four (34) fatalities. The Commission has launched
accidents in the
investigations into all the accidents and will continue to work
NESI.
with all sector stakeholders to improve the overall health and
safety of the NESI.
Pursuant to Section 34(1)(e) of the Electricity Act 2023 which states that "the
Commission shall ensure the safety, security, reliability, and quality of service in the
production and delivery of electricity to consumers”, the Nigerian Electricity
Regulatory Commission (NERC) continues to monitor the technical, operational, and
commercial performance of the Nigerian Electricity Supply Industry (NESI).
The Commission’s evaluation of the state of the NESI for 2024/Q2 covers the
following key areas –
• Available generation
• Plant availability factor
• Total quarterly generation
• Generation load factor
• Generation mix
1,800
2024/Q1 2024/Q2
1,600
1,671
Average Available Capacity (MW)
1,400
1,392
1,200
1,000
800
600
659
400
452
442
431
432
349
347
328
316
301
301
297
278
200
276
0
Egbin ST(Gas) Azura IPP Delta GS Odukpani ainji Jebba Afam VI Others
4
Zungeru has been excluded from the inter-quarterly comparison because it only became operational in
2024/Q2.
The availability factor of a plant is measured as a ratio of the maximum rated output
of the plant declared by the operator (available capacity) relative to the maximum
rated output specified by the manufacturer (installed capacity). The available
capacity of a plant may change from time to time due to several factors including i)
atmospheric conditions at the plant; ii) mechanical availability of the plant (planned
and unplanned outages); iii) feedstock availability, etc. The formula for the plant
availability factor (PAF) is represented by equation 1:
The plant availability factor (PAF) is a critical parameter for evaluating the overall
health of the upstream segment of the NESI. In 2024/Q2, the average plant
availability factor for all grid-connected plants was 32.30% which shows that more
than 67% of the installed capacity in the NESI was unavailable.
Overall, only four (4) plants had availability factors above 50% with the Azura IPP
plant recording the highest availability factor - 98.05%. On the other end of the
spectrum, Omotosho NIPP, Ihovbor NIPP, Alaoji NIPP, and Sapele GT NIPP all
recorded 0% PAF in 2024/Q2.
This is the second consecutive quarter where all four (4) power plants; Alaoji NIPP,
Ihovbor NIPP, Omotosho NIPP, and Sapele GT NIPP have recorded <5% PAF due
to gas issues. As reported in the 2024/Q1 report (section 2.1.2), the management
of the Niger Delta Power Holding Company (NDPHC) is working with its gas
supplier and other relevant stakeholders to implement measures to resolve the issues
hindering gas supply to these power plants.
The PAF of all the grid-connected plants is contained in Table 1. The hydropower
plants; Dadin owa (-47.80pp), ainji (-17.34pp), Shiroro (-13.59pp), and Jebba
(-5.46pp) recorded decreases in PAF in 2024/Q2 compared to 2024/Q1. The
decrease in the PAF of the hydropower plants is consistent with the expected impact
of seasonality on river flows. The capacities of hydropower plants are constrained
by water availability from January to July every year.
The hourly output produced by all the units in a power plant fluctuates based on grid
demand, mechanical operability of the unit(s), and the availability of feedstock.
Plants are only dispatched when the load on the grid is sufficient to offtake the energy
while operating within acceptable technical limits. The factors that determine the
dispatch of a plant include:
Total generation Ave. hourly generation (MWh/h)×24hrs× number of days in the quarter (2)
Both the hourly generation and total generation of the grid-connected power plants
(excluding Zungeru) decreased by -9.52%5 respectively in 2024/Q2 compared to
generation in 2024/Q1; the hourly generation decreased from 4,069.57MWh/h
recorded in 2024/Q1 to 3,682.02MWh/h in 2024/Q2 (-387.56MWh/h) while the
total generation decreased from 8,887.93GWh generated in 2024/Q1 to
8,041.50GWh in 2024/Q2 (-846.43GWh). The significant decrease in generation
is attributable to the decrease in the available capacity of many power plants during
the quarter as explained in section 2.1.1.
5
The percentage change in total generation and average hourly generation is the same across Q2/2024 vs
Q1/2024 because the number of days in each of the quarters is the same (92 days). When there is a difference
between the number of the days of the quarters being compared, the percentage in total generation will be
different from the percentage change in average hourly generation. For ease of comparison with other sections
of the report, the average hourly generation is used in the subsequent analyses.
(+48.64%), Geregu NIPP (+28.18%), Rivers IPP (+26.16%) and Paras (+16.55%)
increased in 2024/Q2 compared to 2024/Q1.
1,800
2024/Q1 2024/Q2
1,600
Average Hourly Generation (Mh/h)
1,596
1,400
1,200
1,240
1,000
800
600
622
400
418
417
400
399
346
336
322
303
200
284
277
268
266
259
0
Egbin ST(Gas) Azura IPP Delta GS ainji Odukpani Afam VI Jebba Others
Generation Companies
Cumulatively, the average hourly generation of the Jebba, Shiroro, and ainji
hydropower plants reduced by -28.09% (741.28MWh/h in 2024/Q2 relative to
1,030.88MWh/h in 2024/Q1). This decrease is consistent with the expectations
associated with seasonal variation which occurs from January to July as explained
in Section 2.1.2.
The cumulative average hourly generation from thermal plants also decreased by -
2.62% (2,934.46MWh/h in 2024/Q2 relative to 3,013.56MWh/h in 2024/Q1)
with sixteen (16) out of the twenty-three (23) thermal plants recording decreases in
generation (Table 2).
Average hourly generation from the Olorunsogo NIPP, Afam IV – V, and Geregu
power plants dropped to 14.54MWh/h, 16.91MWh/h, and 143.08MWh/h
respectively in 2024/Q2, compared to 68.32MWh/h, 43.49MWh/h, and
225.59MWh/h generated in 2024/Q1 (-78.72%, -61.12%, and -36.58%
respectively), driven by gas constraints and mechanical faults.
The load factor is a measure of the utilisation of a power plant’s available capacity,
calculated as the ratio of the average electricity generated over a period to the
maximum possible generation (assuming all the available capacity is utilised all the
time over the period). A higher load factor means better capacity utilisation thereby
reducing the cost per unit of energy and increasing profitability, as fixed costs are
spread over a larger amount of dispatched energy. The load factor (also known as
the dispatch rate) reflects both the demand for energy and a plant’s ability to supply
it. The formula for load factor is represented by equation 3:
The overall load factor for all grid-connected power plants in 2024/Q2 was
91.42%; meaning that on average, 8.58% of available energy (MWh) was not
dispatched during the quarter. The load factor of grid-connected plants (excluding
Zungeru) was 91.48% which is a -4.29pp decrease compared to the 95.77% load
factor recorded in 2024/Q1. When combined with the reduction in the average
available capacity of these plants as indicated in section 2.1.1, this indicates a
decrease in the utilisation of available capacity and the total energy delivered to
the National Grid in 2024/Q2.
The load factors of the seven (7) power plants with the highest dispatch rates in
2024/Q2 are presented in Figure 3. Four (4) power plants (Omoku, Trans Amadi,
Olorunsogo NIPP, and Omotosho) recorded dispatch rates of 100% with ten (10)
other power plants recording dispatch rates above 90%. While ainji and Dadin
owa hydropower plants recorded dispatch rates >90%, Shiroro and Jebba
recorded dispatch rates of 87.98% and 87.28% respectively. This is inconsistent
with the Commission’s Order No: NERC/182/2019 6 and further investigations are
being undertaken by the Commission to determine if sanctions should be issued
against relevant market participants.
6
The Order stipulates that hydropower plants which are the cheapest energy generation source, should be
dispatched with priority to reduce wholesale energy costs for consumers
The electricity generation mix refers to the combination of fuels used to generate
electricity over a period. The composition of the generation mix varies across
countries and is influenced by factors such as natural resource availability,
government policies, environmental considerations, type of power plants, energy
demand, and seasonal fluctuations. An ideal energy mix must balance the three key
elements of the energy trilemma: i) Energy Security2; ii) Energy Sustainability3; and
iii) Energy Affordability/Equity4. The formula for the share of electricity generated
by fuel source is given by equation 4:
The share of electricity generated from different fuel sources in 2024/Q1 and
2024/Q2 are presented in Figure 4. The contribution from hydropower plants to
total generation (2,367.68GWh) increased by +2.66% (+61.29GWh) in 2024/Q2
compared to 2024/Q1 (2,306.39GWh). This translated to a +1.02pp increase in
the contribution of hydropower to the energy mix over the same period; 25.95%
(2,306.39GWh) in 2024/Q1 to 26.98% (2,367.68GWh) in 2024/Q2. The
increase in the contribution of hydropower plants to total generation during the
quarter, despite decreases in the plant availability factor of the existing hydropower
plants reported in section 2.1.2, can be attributed to the Zungeru hydropower plant
which began evacuating power onto the grid on 29 April 2024.
Transmission Loss Factor (TLF) refers to the proportion of the total energy sent out
by the power plants that was either lost in transmission or utilised in the transmission
station i.e., neither delivered to the DisCos nor exported to international customers.
There is an inverse relationship between the TLF and the efficiency of the transmission
system; i.e. a decline in the TLF indicates an improvement in transmission efficiency
over a given period. The formula for TLF is represented by equation 5:
The average TLF in 2024/Q2 was 7.79% 7 (Figure 5). A TLF of 7.79% indicates that
for every 100MWh of energy injected into the grid, 7.79MWh of energy is
undelivered to DisCos and international customers due to losses in the transmission
network or consumption at the transmission substations. The TLF recorded in
2024/Q2 represents a decrease (improvement) of -0.69pp relative to the 8.48%
recorded in 2024/Q1.
7
This represents the average TLF recorded in April and June only – May has been excluded because of the
extraordinarily low TLF recorded in the month as a result of the fact that energy injected into the grid by Zungeru
between 29 April to 15 May 2024 was not apportioned to DisCos and thus was used to net off transmission
losses on the grid during the period.
8
Transmission Loss Factor (%)
7
2024 MYTO LTF Target 7.00%
6
1
Jan-24 Feb-24 Mar-24 Apr-24 May-24 Jun-24
Months
Figure 5: Actual Transmission Loss Factor (%) vs. MYTO TLF Target (%) Jan - June
2024
As specified in section 10.1.2 of the Grid Code, the standard frequency for
operation on the Grid is 50Hz. The code provides that under normal circumstances,
the grid can operate within a deviation of ±0.5% i.e. between a lower limit of
49.75Hz and an upper limit of 50.25Hz. Section 10.1.2 of the Grid Code further
provides that in extreme circumstances, the grid may operate within a tolerance of
±2.5% i.e. system frequency may reach a lower bound stress limit of 48.75Hz and
an upper bound stress limit of 51.25Hz.
A system’s stability over a given period is measured by its ability to operate as close
as possible to the 50Hz benchmark set in the Grid Code; this means that the lower
the range between the average upper daily system frequency and the average
lower daily system frequency, the more stable the system has been.
During 2024/Q2, the average upper daily system frequency was 50.64Hz, while
the average lower daily system frequency was 49.13Hz, which translates to a range
of 1.51Hz. Comparatively, in 2024/Q1, the average upper daily system frequency
was 50.68Hz, while the average lower system frequency was 49.00Hz, with a
range of 1.68Hz. The -10.12% (-0.17Hz) decrease in the average quarterly
frequency range recorded in 2024/Q2 relative to 2024/Q1 indicates an
improvement in the operational performance of the National Grid.
It is noteworthy that in May, the average upper frequency (50.06Hz) was lower
than the upper range allowed in the grid code – this is the first month in over seven
(7) years where the national grid has operated at an average upper frequency
within 50.25Hz limit for steady-state operation. While the average lower frequency
(49.23Hz) was outside of the steady state limit contained in the grid code
(49.75Hz), it was the closest average to the target recorded in over five (5) years
further verifying the improved performance of the grid in May 2024 (Figure 6).
The operation of the grid outside the normal frequency limits indicates an imbalance
in the supply and demand of electricity on the grid. This imbalance is primarily
caused by the lack of a Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system.
The System Operator (SO) has invested in an IoT-based solution to improve real-
time visibility into the operations of the Grid. However, the inability to remotely
operate the entire system as would be possible under the SCADA system continues
to pose challenges to the SO’s ability to operate the grid within the normal frequency
limits provided in the grid code.
To guarantee the quality of electricity delivered to end users, the Grid Code specifies
a nominal system voltage of 330kV with a tolerance range of ±5% (313.50kV to
346.50kV in the lower and upper bounds respectively). Fluctuations in grid voltage,
including spikes, dips, flickers, and brownouts, can cause significant harm to
consumers and result in substantial commercial losses. Extreme cases of voltage
fluctuations, particularly at the distribution network level can cause severe damage
to industrial machines thereby compelling the industrial customers to seek alternative
sources of power outside of the National Grid.
The system voltage pattern from Jan - June 2024 is illustrated in Figure 7. The
average upper and lower operating voltage bounds for the transmission network in
2024/Q2 were 355.13kV and 304.36kV respectively; both values are outside the
respective allowable limits specified in the Grid Code.
By way of comparison, the range between the Grid’s average upper and lower
operating voltage for 2024/Q2 was 50.77kV which is lower than the 55.58kV
(average upper and lower voltages of 353.18kV and 297.60kV respectively) that
was recorded in 2024/Q1. This finding confirms the conclusion from section 2.2.2
that there was an improvement in the operational efficiency of the National Grid in
2024/Q2 relative to 2024/Q1.
The Commission continues to engage with TCN and other stakeholders to ensure
sustained efforts at keeping the system voltage within the regulated limits, providing
a safe and reliable electricity supply to end users.
The national power grid is a vast network of electrical transmission lines that link
power stations to end-use customers across the nation and is designed to function
within specific stability boundaries, including voltage (330kV ± 5.0%) and frequency
(50Hz ± 0.5%). Any deviation from these stability ranges can result in decreased
power quality and, in severe cases, cause widespread power outages ranging from
a partial collapse of a section of the grid to a full system-wide blackout.
While the SO is responsible for ensuring that all parameters are maintained within
their respective tolerance thresholds, the primary parameter that the SO tracks to
avoid system disturbances is frequency. When the electricity demand is higher than
the supply, the grid frequency drops. Conversely, if supply surpasses demand, the
frequency increases. In reaction to the grid operating at a frequency outside of the
normal operation range (especially when the frequency is too low), safety settings
on generation units can cause the units to shut down. This often exacerbates the
frequency imbalance on the grid thereby leading even more generation units to shut
down causing a full or partial system collapse.
One (1) incident of partial collapse on the national grid occurred in 2024/Q2. The
incident happened on 15 April 2024. The details of the events leading to the incident
are contained in Table 3.
1 15th April The cascading tripping of A fire incident at the The cause(s) of the fire
2024 at generating units at 12 Afam Transmission incident at Afam
02:41hours power stations 8 caused Station caused the Transmission Station
load–generation tripping of Afam VI and should be investigated to
imbalance inducing a Afam III with a load loss avert future occurrences.
frequency decline from of 305MW and 25MW The cause(s) of the
50.01Hz to 48.75Hz respectively while also cascaded tripping of
which led to a Partial triggering the split of the units on Island 2 should
system collapse of Island operations of the grid be investigated and
29. into two (2) islands – rectified to forestall
island 1 (Ibom power) future occurrences.
and Island 2.
8
The power plants are Delta, Odukpani G.S, Okpai, Olorunsogo Gas, Jebba G.S, Kainji G.S, Geregu gas
and NIPP, Sapele steam, Shiroro G.S, Azura, and Paras Energy
9
Island 2 consist of Kainji, Jebba, Shiroro, Dadin Kowa, Egbin, Delta, Sapele Steam, Geregu 1, Geregu
Nipp, Omotosho 1, Olorunsogo Gas & Nipp, Azura-Edo, Paras Energy, Okpai, Afam Vi, Rivers Ipp,
Odukpani, Taopex, Mepp, and Omoku power plants
The commercial performance of the NESI is a measure of the flow of funds from
customers to upstream electricity industry players. The financial performance is
critical because funds are required to keep all the players along the value chain
operational. In evaluating the commercial performance of the NESI for 2024/Q2,
the following parameters were considered:
The Partial Activation of Contract (PAC) regime, which took effect in July 2022,
defines the target volume of energy to be off-taken by DisCos at any time as their
Partially Contracted Capacity (PCC). As explained in prior reports, under the PAC
regime, DisCos have take-or-pay obligations on their PCC which means that they
must pay for available capacity irrespective of their offtake. This structure is
consistent with international best practices for long-term contract-based power
procurement and ensures that GenCos earn capacity payments to compensate them
for availability.
The PAC regime also mandates GenCos or TCN to compensate DisCos through
Liquidated Damages (LDs) in the event of capacity shortfalls. Under the single-buyer
model being operated in the NESI, when there is a shortfall in generation, LDs from
GenCos are treated as net-offs in the invoices issued to NBET thereby reducing the
net payables due from DisCos.
When there is sufficient generation capacity, every DisCo will be directed by the SO
to offtake its entire PCC. When generation falls below the required target, the SO
prorates the available capacity among all DisCos based on their respective PCCs 10
10
Commencing 2023/Q3, the Commission developed a mechanism whereby Abuja, Eko and Ikeja DisCos get
their full allocation provided that generation is above 4,100MW which is the minimum grid stability requirement;
the rest of the capacity is pro-rated based on PCC for the remaining DisCos. When available generation is below
4,100MW, generation allocation to all the DisCos is pro-rated based on PCC.
– “Available PCC”. The ratio between a DisCo’s energy offtake and the available
PCC is known as the “energy offtake performance”. The formula for determining a
DisCo’s energy offtake performance is represented by equation 6:
Energy Offtake
Energy Offtake performance (%) ( ) ×100 (6)
Available PCC
Considering the large disparity between energy on the national grid and customer
demand, it is expected that DisCos will offtake 100% of their available PCC at all
times. However, the Commission continues to observe with concern that many DisCos
do not take their full PCC due to a combination of technical limitations as well as
load rejection by the DisCos largely due to commercial reasons i.e., high commercial
and collection losses in certain areas.
It is noteworthy that when DisCos have offtake ratios below 100%, this means that
they incur increased wholesale energy costs as they still have to pay NBET/GenCos
for unused capacity. The tariff methodology utilised by the Commission does not
allow DisCos to recover the resultant additional wholesale energy costs (relative to
the volume of energy offtaken) from customers.
In 2024/Q2, the average energy offtake by DisCos at their trading points was
3,165.93MWh/h, which represents a decrease of -3.59% (-117.94MWh/h) when
compared to 3,283.87MWh/h off-take in 2024/Q1. The reduction in the average
energy offtake at trading points was because of the reduction in energy available
for offtake (PCC) driven by the reduced generation explained in section 2.1.3.
The cumulative energy offtake performance of DisCos during the quarter was
99.29% which is +6.94pp greater than the 92.35% achieved in 2024/Q1.
Disaggregated DisCo performance shows that all the DisCos except Jos DisCo took
more than 90% of its PCC during the quarter. Nine (9) DisCos recorded increases
in their offtake performances between 2024/Q1 and 2024/Q2 with Port Harcourt,
Benin and Eko DisCos recording the most significant improvements of +12.21pp,
+9.31pp and +9.00pp respectively. Conversely, Jos and Yola DisCos recorded
decreases of –2.57pp and -0.38pp respectively, in their energy offtake performance
between 2024/Q1 and 2024/Q2 (Table 4).
2024/Q1 2024/Q2
Energy Available Offtake Energy Available Offtake
DisCos Offtake PCC Performance Offtake PCC Performance
(MWh/h) (MWh/h) % (MWh/h) (MWh/h) %
Abuja 512.36 555.63 92.21 498.63 509.26 97.91
Benin 263.71 287.03 91.88 257.81 254.79 101.19
Eko 433.15 485.76 89.17 431.32 439.35 98.17
Enugu 252.54 270.77 93.27 225.27 235.48 95.66
Ibadan 383.51 398.90 96.14 373.68 364.16 102.61
Ikeja 511.83 555.53 92.13 520.53 516.06 100.87
Jos 181.15 199.79 90.67 152.33 172.91 88.10
aduna 203.25 216.09 94.06 202.69 201.31 100.69
ano 201.61 218.00 92.48 203.45 202.48 100.48
PH 243.14 260.52 93.33 243.24 230.48 105.54
Yola 97.61 106.03 92.06 56.99 62.16 91.68
All DisCos 3,283.87 3,556.05 92.35 3,165.93 3,188.59 99.29
The Commission will continue to undertake regulatory activities that will compel
DisCos to improve their operational capacities to facilitate the maximum utilisation
of energy that is made available by the GenCos.
The total energy offtake by all DisCos in 2024/Q2 was 6,914.39GWh and the total
energy billed was 5,693.11GWh, which translates to a billing efficiency of 82.34%.
A billing efficiency of 82.34% implies that for every ₦100 worth of energy received
by DisCos in 2024/Q2, ₦17.66 was not billed to end users. Comparatively, the
total energy received and billed in 2024/Q1 were 7,171.93GWh and
5,769.52GWh respectively, which translated to a billing efficiency of 80.45%. This
means that at the aggregated level, the NESI recorded a +1.89pp increase in billing
efficiency between 2024/Q1 and 2024/Q2.
Disaggregated performance of the DisCos shows that Enugu recorded the highest
billing efficiency of 95.33%, while aduna recorded the lowest billing efficiency of
63.07%. A quarter-on-quarter comparison of billing efficiency showed that six (6)
DisCos recorded improvements in their billing efficiencies in 2024/Q2 relative to
2024/Q1 with Enugu, Yola and aduna recording the most significant increases of
+14.87pp, +7.31pp and +6.41pp respectively. Conversely, five (5) DisCos
recorded decreases in billing efficiency with Jos (-3.28pp) DisCo recording the most
significant decrease (Table 5).
Collection efficiency is the ratio of the amount that has been collected from customers
relative to the amount billed to them by the DisCos. The significant under-recovery
of the invoices issued to customers by DisCos is driven by a lack of willingness of
customers to pay bills when due, unsatisfactory DisCos’ services and inadequate
customer metering among other challenges. A collection efficiency of 70% for
instance implies that for every ₦100.00 worth of energy billed to customers by
DisCos, approximately ₦30.00 remained unrecovered from the billed customers.
The formula for collection efficiency is represented by equation 8:
The total revenue collected by all DisCos in 2024/Q2 was ₦431.16 billion out of
the ₦543.64 billion that was billed to customers. This translates to a collection
efficiency of 79.31%. In comparison, the total revenue collected by all DisCos in
2024/Q1 was ₦291.62 billion out of the ₦368.65 billion billed to customers which
translated to a 79.11% collection efficiency. The 79.31% collection efficiency
recorded in 2024/Q2 is +0.20pp higher than the collection efficiency recorded in
2024/Q1 (79.11%).
The most proven method to improve energy accountability and revenue recovery is
accurate customer enumeration and the installation of end-use customer meters. The
Commission issued the Order on the Operationalisation of Tranche A of the Meter
Acquisition Fund (MAF) during the quarter. The Order which became effective on
24th June 2024 directed DisCos to utilise the first tranche of disbursement from the
MAF scheme to procure and install meters for unmetered Band A customers within
their franchise areas. DisCos are also still expected to continue to utilise one or more
metering frameworks provided for in the NERC MAP and NMMP metering
regulation (2021) to improve end-use customer metering in their franchise area. This
will reduce commercial and collection losses thereby improving the flow of funds to
upstream market participants in the NESI.
The target ATC&C reflects the efficient operational losses which the DisCo is
expected to incur in its operations and this is recoverable from the allowed tariffs.
The target ATC&C usually reduces over time as DisCos make investments that are
geared towards improving operational efficiency. ATC&C loss is made up of the
following components:
a. Technical Loss: heat loss due to load flow in electrical lines and transformation
loss in transformers.
b. Commercial Loss: due to discrepancy in meter reading, erroneous billing,
unmetered consumption, or energy theft;
c. Collection Loss: unpaid bills.
Any DisCo that can outperform its allowed ATC&C (i.e., has a lower actual ATC&C
than the target used to compute its cost-reflective tariff) will earn more returns on its
set tariffs. Conversely, any DisCo that fails to meet its allowed ATC&C (i.e., has a
higher actual ATC&C than the target), will be unable to earn the expected returns
on its set tariffs and could risk long-term financial challenges.
The aggregate ATC&C loss recorded across all 11 DisCos in 2024/Q2 was
34.70%, which comprised 17.66% in technical and commercial losses, and 20.69%
in collection loss (Table 7). The aggregate ATC&C loss of 34.70% recorded in
2024/Q2 is 9.97pp higher than the allowed aggregate efficient loss target
(24.73%) applied in the computation of the tariffs in the MYTO. This means that
cumulatively, DisCos recorded losses that are 9.97pp higher than what was allowed
to be recovered from the customers – these inefficient losses that are not recoverable
from customers will adversely affect DisCos' profitability.
The ATC&C loss for 2024/Q2 (34.70%) reduced by -1.66pp compared to 36.36%
recorded in 2024/Q1. Eight (8) DisCos recorded improvements in ATC&C loss
performance in 2024/Q2 compared to 2024/Q1 with the highest improvements
recorded by Yola (-14.32pp) and Enugu (-6.49pp). Conversely, Ikeja (+6.12pp),
ano (+3.46pp) and aduna (+1.80pp) DisCos recorded worse ATC&C loss
performances in 2024/Q2 compared to 2024/Q1 (Table 7).
Under the account administration mechanism set up by the CBN in 2013 as part of
the Nigerian Electricity Market Stabilisation Facility (NEMSF) intervention, all the
collections of the DisCos are escrowed. The DisCos only have access to their
revenues after relevant deductions towards their loan obligations have been made.
This escrow mechanism also provides visibility into the financial performance of the
DisCos with respect to collections.
In June 2020, the remit of the fund manager responsible for the escrow was
expanded to include the implementation of the payment waterfall framework which
was designed by the Commission to increase upstream market remittance to NBET
and TCN. This was to cover the cost of energy taken from GenCos, transmission
charges (payable to the TSP) and the MO’s administrative charges.
As explained in the 2024/Q1 report, the DRO regime replaced the Minimum
Remittance Obligation 12 (MRO) framework in January 2024 and DisCos are
expected to pay 100% of their DROs. The transition to the DRO regime was
necessitated by the risk of unpaid tariff subsidy debts encumbering the balance
sheets of the DisCos thereby preventing them from raising finance to undertake
critical investments. Furthermore, DisCos are expected to remit 100% of the invoices
received from the MO for transmission and administrative service costs.
The total NBET invoices and final obligation for each DisCo (based on DRO) during
2024/Q2 are summarised in Table 8. It is important to note that due to the absence
of cost-reflective tariffs across all DisCos, the Government incurred a subsidy
obligation of ₦380.06 billion (52.51% of total NBET invoice) in 2024/Q2 (average
of ₦126.69 billion per month). Between 2024/Q1 and 2024/Q2, the subsidy
obligation of the government reduced by - ₦253.24 billion, from ₦633.30 billion
(90.57% of total GenCo invoice) to ₦380.06 billion (52.51% of total GenCo
invoice). The significant decrease in the subsidy obligation of the FGN is a result of
the policy directive of the Government to implement reviews of tariffs charged to
Band A customers while the tariffs for Band B-E customers remain frozen at the rates
payable since December 2022.
In 2024/Q2, the DRO-adjusted invoice from NBET to the DisCos was ₦343.76
billion 13 while the total remittance made was ₦271.87 billion, which translates to a
79.09%% remittance performance. Comparatively, in 2024/Q1, the DRO-adjusted
invoice from NBET to DisCos was ₦65.96 billion and the total remittance was
₦65.52 billion, which translated to a 99.33% remittance performance. This means
that the remittance performance of DisCos to NBET decreased by –20.24pp in
11
The outstanding portion of GenCo invoice not covered by allowed tariffs and thus not billed to the DisCos is
to be covered by the FGN in the form of tariff subsidies.
12
For the MRO framework, DisCos are invoiced 100% of energy cost but only expected to pay MRO share of
the invoice. The outstanding balance is only cleared from the DisCo’s record when the FGN subsidy is paid to
NBET
13
Total NBET invoice for 2024/Q2 without adjustment for DRO (total bill issued by GenCos) is ₦723.82
billion
Table 8: Total NBET Invoice and Final Obligation (DRO) of DisCos for 2024/Q2
65.06
57.71
54.53
53.86
51.70
Remittances (₦ Billion)
47.98
38.76
29.50
27.48
24.18
23.73
21.93
20.30
19.24
19.24
19.04
14.20
11.88
7.84
5.61
0.88
0.97
Abuja Benin Eko Enugu Ibadan Ikeja Jos aduna ano P/Harcourt Yola
Performance 83% 80% 99% 79% 76% 79% 66% 29% 70% 81% 111%
The Market Operator issues invoices to DisCos for energy transmission and
administrative services. In 2024/Q2, DisCos made a total remittance of ₦46.78
billion against the cumulative invoice of ₦55.77 billion issued by the MO. This
payment translates to 83.88% remittance performance and is a -9.76pp decrease
when compared to 93.64% remittance performance recorded in 2024/Q1 where
DisCos remitted ₦45.09 billion out of ₦48.16 billion invoice issued by the MO.
MO Invoice MO Remittance
9.00
9.15
9.14
8.51
8.00
8.10
7.00
6.92
Remittances (₦ Billion)
6.64
6.49
6.00
5.58
5.00
4.52
4.00
4.18
4.06
3.87
3.72
3.61
3.51
3.49
3.00
3.17
2.51
2.00
1.99
1.57
1.00
1.04
0.79
0.00
Abuja Benin Eko Enugu Ibadan Ikeja Jos aduna ano P/Harcourt Yola
Performance 93% 86% 96% 84% 86% 89% 63% 22% 72% 92% 150%
14
Remittances above 100% are due to payment of outstanding invoices from previous quarters
15
In May 2024, Yola made payment against all outstanding MO invoices from Jan – May 2024
The special customer (Ajaokuta Steel Co. Ltd and the host community) did not make
any payment towards the ₦1.39 billion (NBET) and ₦0.11 billion (MO) invoices
received in 2024/Q2. This continues a longstanding trend of non-payment by this
customer and the Commission has communicated the need for intervention on this
issue to the relevant FGN authorities. A continuation of the non-payment could
trigger total disconnection from the grid.
NBET MO
Invoice Remittance Performance Invoice Remittance Performance
(Million) (Million) (%) (Million) (Million) (%)
2024 2024 2024 2024 2024 2024
/Q2 /Q2 /Q2 /Q2 /Q2 /Q2
International Customers
The Commission did not issue any new Regulation for the NESI in 2024/Q2.
3.1.2 Orders
During the quarter, the Commission issued forty-two (42) Orders to guide the
activities of licensees. The details of the Orders are outlined below:
However, in line with the policy direction of the FGN on electricity subsidy, the
allowed tariffs for Band B-E customer categories remained frozen at the rates
payable in December 2022 subject to further policy direction by the government.
This implies that, vide the April 2024 supplementary Order, only the Band A
customer category experienced changes in their tariffs relative to March 2024.
The Order provides that prices of meters under the MAP scheme shall be
determined through a competitive bidding process and customers will be
provided with a choice of authorised meter vendors. Meters to be deployed
under the MAP scheme may include basic electronic meters, Internet of Things
(IoT) meters, DIN Rail meters and Current Limiters but are subject to full
compliance with the NESI Metering Code and the requirements/specifications of
the DisCos.
The Orders became effective on the 1st of May 2024 and have the following
objectives;
functions stipulated in the EA. The name of the company shall be the Nigerian
Independent System Operator of Nigeria Limited (NISO) which will manage all
assets and liabilities pertaining to market and system operation as well as carry
out all market and system operation-related contractual rights and obligations
novated to it by the TCN. The initial subscribers to the NISO shall be the BPE and
the Ministry of Finance Incorporated (MOFI).
Due to the subsistence of the policy direction of the FGN on electricity subsidy
which mandates that tariffs for Band B-E customer categories shall remain frozen
at the rates payable in December 2022, subject to further policy direction by the
government, only customers in Band A experienced any change in their May
tariffs relative to April 2024.
Due to the subsistence of the policy direction of the FGN on electricity subsidy,
which mandates that tariffs for Band B-E customer categories shall remain frozen
at the rates payable in December 2022, subject to further policy direction by the
government, only customers in Band A experienced any change in their June
tariffs relative to May 2024.
The Order provided that DisCos shall utilise the first tranche of disbursement from
the MAF scheme based on contributions made by DisCos as at the April 2024 market
settlement to procure and install meters for unmetered Band A customers within their
franchise areas. The Order also specified the reporting requirements of the various
parties to the Commission with respect to the operationalisation of the MAF (Table
11).
ii. Provide a transition plan for the transfer of regulatory oversight for the
intrastate electricity market in Imo State from the Commission to ISERC in
accordance with the CFRN and the EA.
iii. Address ensuing transitional matters arising from the transfer of regulatory
oversight for the intrastate electricity market in Imo State from the
Commission to ISERC.
The Order mandates EEDC to incorporate within 60 days, a subsidiary under the
CAMA for the assumption of its responsibilities for intrastate supply and distribution
of electricity in Imo State.
3.1.3 Directives
In 2024/Q2, the Commission issued one (1) Directive for managing grid imbalances
caused by insufficient generation. The details of the Directive are outlined below;
The Directive was issued further to the Commission’s Order on the Transmission
System Dispatch Operation, Cross-Border Supply and Related Matters
(NERC/2024/044) and in the overriding public interest of ensuring continuous
improvement in electricity supply to Nigerians. The Directive was issued to
ensure that the Zungeru power plant continued to inject power to improve
service delivery to electricity consumers pending the finalisation of its long-term
contractual arrangements with prospective off-takers.
In 2024/Q2, the Commission issued five (5) new off-grid generation licences (gross
capacity of 12.36MW), two (2) on-grid generation licences (gross capacity of
66MW), one (1) new trading licence and one (1) system operator licence (Table
12).
Captive power generation permits are issued to entities that intend to own and
maintain power plants exclusively for their own consumption i.e. no sale of electricity
generated from the plant to any third party. The Commission issued one (1) captive
power generation permit in 2024/Q2 to Nestle Nigeria in Lagos State with a
nameplate capacity of 5MW.
Pursuant to section 165(1)(m) of the EA 2023 which states that the Commission
shall “award licence of mini-grid concessions to renewable energy companies to
exclusively serve a specific geographical location indicating aggregate electricity
to be generated and distributed from a site with obligation to serve customers to
request service”, the Commission continues to encourage the development and
utilisation of renewable energy by issuing permits and registration certificates for
mini-grid development.
The Commission certified six (6) MSPs – three (3) meter installer companies, and
three (3) meter manufacturers in 2024/Q2. The Commission also issued 2 (two)
permits for MAP. Details of the certified MSPs and MAP are contained in Table 13.
1 CCECC SU Power Petition for a review of fines imposed 8 May 2024 Subjudiced by
Company & SU by the commission for operating suite no:
Distribution Plc undertakings without requisite FHC/LF/CS/4
licensees /2024
3 Ibadan DisCo Petition for a review of April 30 May 2024 The ruling has
Supplementary Order to MYTO been
2024 & non-compliance with the communicated
procedure for tariff review
16
Hearings are proceedings pursuant to the provisions of the Act through which the Commission seeks additional
information on petitions or any matter filed before it by market participants or consumers in order to make a
final decision.
Section 64(1) of the EA 2023 mandates all licensees to comply with the provisions
of their licences, regulations, codes, orders and other requirements issued by the
Commission. The Commission is responsible for evaluating the compliance of all its
licensees/permit-holders and carrying out enforcement actions against infractions
based on the provisions of the Act and other extant regulatory instruments.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 76 of the EA 2023, the Commission issued five
(5) Rectification Directives (RD), five (5) Notices of Intention to Commence
Enforcement (NICE) and three (3) fines for different breaches/defaults in 2024/Q2
(full list and further details can be found in Table 15). The Commission is committed
to ensuring that all licensees comply with the codes and standards of the NESI as
well as the provisions of their respective licences.
Pursuant to the provisions of section 42.3.7 of the Market Rule, the Commission has
established an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) process to resolve disputes
between market participants in the NESI. This includes the constitution of a Dispute
Resolution Panel (DRP) and the appointment of a Dispute Resolution Counsellor
(DRC). No disputes were brought before the DRP during this quarter.
Failure to comply with the HSE Code and Abuja, Eko, Jos
6 03 April 2024 16 April 2024
NESIS regulations and Ikeja DisCos
Fines
As part of its routine activities, the Commission also engages relevant stakeholders
as well as the wider public to apprise them of the Commission’s activities. The main
avenues for the interface between the Commission and stakeholders are:
The details of these engagements are shared with the public via the Commission’s
social media accounts (LinkedIn, X and Instagram). In addition to the update on the
engagement activities, the Commission also uses these channels to address relevant
issues including:
In 2024/Q2, the Commission held one (1) town hall meeting in Enugu between
18th-20th April 2024. Some of the major issues that were discussed at the town hall
meeting include:
The Commission also continued to sponsor radio jingles across radio stations
throughout the country. These jingles educate customers on complaint redress
mechanisms and provide addresses of NERC Forum Offices.
During 2024/Q2, 49,188 end-user customers were metered with Abuja, Ikeja and
Aba DisCos recording the highest number of meter installations accounting for
23.85%, 18.45% and 17.86% respectively, of the total installations. Relative to
2024/Q1, this translates to a -60.86% decrease in the total number of customers
metered during the quarter (125,664).
Only ano (+138.19%) and Aba (+12.37%) DisCos recorded improvements in the
number of meter installations. All other DisCos recorded a decline in meter
installations with Jos (-87.48%), Eko (-82.53%) and Ibadan (-77.19%) DisCos
recording the biggest decline in the number of meters installed in 2024/Q2
compared to 2024/Q1 (Table 17).
17
Upon data reconciliation, the number of meters installed across all metering schemes in 2024/Q1 was
125,664 as against 123,604 reported in the 2024/Q1 report.
18
There are 5 metering frameworks contained in the Commission’s updated MAP & NMMP Regulations (NERC -
R-113-2021). They are:
• Meter Asset Provider: This framework aims to provide for the provision and maintenance of end-user
meters as a service by third-party investors on which customers benefitting from such meters pay a
Metering Service Charge (MSC) to cover the cost of metering service.
• National Mass Metering Programme: This is a policy intervention with support from the CBN for the
provision of long-term (10-year tenure) single-digit interest loans to DisCos strictly for the provision of
locally manufactured/assembled meters to customers.
metering progress under the NMMP, MAP as well as Vendor and DisCo financed
frameworks are presented in appendices IX, X and XI respectively.
Under the MAP framework, a total of 35,985 meters were installed in 2024/Q2
representing a -68.46% decrease compared to the 114,082 MAP meter installations
recorded in 2024/Q1. Abuja (10,717), Ibadan (5,828) and Ikeja (5,732) DisCos
recorded the highest number of installations under the MAP framework during the
quarter with 29.78%, 16.20% and 15.93% of the total installations respectively.
Since October 2023, only aduna DisCo has metered customers under the NMMP
framework; 264 customers were metered in 2024/Q2. Abuja, Eko, Ibadan, Ikeja,
Jos and Port Harcourt DisCos have exhausted their meter allocations under the
NMMP phase 0 and hence have achieved a 100% utilisation rate. Benin, aduna
and Yola still have significant allocations under the NMMP which they are yet to
utilise.
A total of 12,843 customers were metered under the Vendor financed framework in
2024/Q2. Aba, Abuja, Benin and Ikeja are the only DisCos that have taken
advantage of this metering framework. During the quarter, Aba and Ikeja DisCos
installed 8,483 and 3,344 respectively, under the framework. These correspond to
+31.09% and +33.02% change respectively compared to the 6,471 and 2,514
installations in 2024/Q1. Only ano DisCo (96) recorded meter installations under
the DisCo financed framework in 2024/Q2.
• Vendor Finance: This is a mutual agreement between a DisCo and a Local Meter
Manufacturer/Assembler (LMMA) or Meter Asset Provider (MAP) on a deferred payment arrangement
where the base cost of meters shall not exceed the regulated price approved by the Commission.
• Self-funded by DisCos: This involves procurement of meters from other sources outside the MAP and
NMMP framework. The allowable costs of meters, accessories, installation and warranties should not
exceed the regulated pricing approval by the Commission and the terms of supply should not be in
conflict with terms of existing MAP and NMMP contracts.
• Other External Efficient Meter Financing: The Commission has also approved other external meter
financing that are efficient, cost-effective, and in tune with the terms of existing MAP and NMMP
contracts.
channels for customers to lodge complaints against their service providers. The
primary channels available for customers to lodge complaints in the NESI are:
C. NERC Forum Offices: Forum offices serve as the “court of second instance” for
customers not happy with the resolution of their complaints at the DisCo-CCU. The
Commission set up Forum Offices to hear and resolve customer complaints not
satisfactorily resolved at the DisCo-CCUs. As of 30th June 2024, the Commission
had thirty-two (32) operational Forum Offices in thirty (30) states and the FCT,
Abuja. The details including names, addresses and contacts of the Commission’s
Forum Offices are contained in Appendix XV.
The Forum Office is managed by the forum secretariat while the hearings are
conducted by five (5) forum panel members who are not staff of the Commission, as
stipulated in the Customer Protection Regulation (CPR) 2023. The forum panels hear
and resolve customer complaints in the state in which it is situated, if there is no
Forum Office in a state, the Commission determines which neighbouring Forum
Office will oversee customer complaints from the state. The composition of the forum
panel is as follows:
4.3.1 NERC-CCU
In 2024/Q2, 4,469 complaints were received at the Commission’s CCU and 1,000
were resolved corresponding to a 22.38% resolution rate. Customers of Ikeja and
Eko DisCos lodged 1,704 and 1,052 complaints accounting for 38.13% and
23.54% respectively of the total complaints lodged at NERC-CCU. Conversely, Aba
Power had the lowest number of complaints with 16 (0.36%).
During the quarter, customer complaints about billing constituted 30.90% of the total
complaints. Other common issues among the 4,469 complaints received were
complaints about tariff band (24.70%), service interruption (17.92%) and metering
(17.72%). These four (4) complaints categories cumulatively accounted for 91.25%
of the total complaints in the quarter (Figure 10). The complaints on billing that were
resolved during the quarter resulted in a credit adjustment on customers' bills to the
tune of ₦134,127,040.25 (Appendices XIII and XIV).
The Commission notes the poor resolution rate (22.38%) of complaints lodged at
the NERC-CCU in 2024/Q2 and is taking steps to improve the speediness of
complaints resolution by DisCos. The complaint resolution meetings organised by
the Commission between DisCos and customers provide for “on-the-spot” resolution
of customer complaints by DisCos. If the complaints raised at the meetings cannot
be resolved on the spot, the Commission provides reasonable timelines for resolution
and has put in place a tracking mechanism to monitor DisCos’ compliance.
4.3.2 DisCo-CCUs
ano (+58.35%) and Aba (+28.58%) DisCos recorded the most significant increase
in the number of customer complaints received in 2024/Q2 compared to 2024/Q1.
Conversely, Enugu (-38.12%) and Yola (-26.82%) DisCos recorded the most
significant decrease in the number of customer complaints received.
The most common issues among the 287,441 complaints received by DisCos in
2024/Q2 were metering (48.85%), billing (14.29%), and service interruption
(9.80%). These three (3) complaints categories cumulatively accounted for 72.95%
of the total complaints in the quarter (Figure 11).
66,341
23.08%
METER
3,363
1.17% SERVICE INTERRUPTION
140,423 BILLING
41,078 48.85%
14.29% DISCONNECTION
DELAY IN CONNECTION
OTHERS
470
0.16% 28,179
9.80%
4,798
1.67%
The summary of the appeals received across the Forum Offices is presented in Table
19. Through 2024/Q2, there were 2,625 active appeals (905 pending appeals
from 2024/Q1 and 1,720 new appeals in 2024/Q2) across the 32 Forum Offices.
This represents a +8.07% increase compared to the 2,429 active appeals in the
previous quarter (2024/Q1). Compared to 2024/Q1, the pending appeals carried
over in the quarter (2024/Q2) increased by 129 (+16.62%) while new appeals
increased by 67 (+4.05%). The Forum Offices serving Ibadan DisCo have the
highest number of active appeals (717) while the Forum Office serving Yola DisCo
has the fewest (8) in 2024/Q2.
The total number of Forum sittings in 2024/Q2 increased by +4.17% from 72 sittings
in 2024/Q1 to 75. Cumulatively, the Forum Offices recorded a decrease of -2.65pp
in appeal resolution rate between 2024/Q1 and 2024/Q2; 57.55% vs. 54.90%.
The decrease in complaint resolution rate despite an increase in forum sitting can be
attributed to the number of active appeals during the quarter compared to
2024/Q1. The Commission will continue efforts to ensure that the forum panels sit
regularly to increase the resolution rate and reduce the number of pending appeals
carried over across quarters.
The breakdown of the various categories of active appeals at the Forum Offices in
2024/Q2 is contained in Figure 12. Similar to 2024/Q1, appeals related to billing
were the most prevalent, accounting for 55.93% of the total appeals received
(2024/Q1 – 59.59%). Appeals related to metering and disconnection represented
25.23% and 6.22% of the appeals, respectively. The Commission is working on
interventions to improve the quality of customer complaint resolution at the DisCo-
CCU to resolve effectively and reduce the number of appeals filed at the Forum
Offices.
4
0.23% 164
9.53%
26 BILLING
1.51%
DISCONNECTION
DELAY IN CONNECTION
434
25.23% SERVICE INTERRUPTION
962
55.93% METERING
LOADSHEDDING
21 VOLTAGE INTERRUPTION
1.22% 107
6.22%
OTHERS
2
0.12%
Statistics of accidents in the NESI for 2024/Q2 are presented in Table 20. Relative
to 2024/Q1, the number of accidents increased by +14.55% (55 to 63), the number
of fatalities increased by +47.83% (23 to 34) but the number of injuries decreased
by -45.16% (31 to 17).
Table 20: Health and Safety (H&S) Reports in 2024/Q1 vs. 2024/Q2
During the quarter (2024/Q2), no casualty was recorded among the GenCos while
NESCO and Yola were the only DisCos that did not record casualties 20. Out of the
fifty-one (51) casualties reported in the quarter, the licensees with the highest number
of casualties were Ibadan (13), Eko (8), Jos (7) and Enugu (6) which represented
25.49%, 15.69%, 13.73% and 11.76% of the total respectively.
As observed in previous quarters, DisCos continue to account for the majority of the
safety challenges experienced in NESI. Cumulatively, they accounted for 100% of
19
The licensees with outstanding reports are Paras Energy (3), FIPL (2); Benin (1), Ibadan (1) and Jos (1)
DisCos
20 Casualty refers to the count of injuries and deaths arising from any safety accident/incident.
Furthermore, TCN (23), Ibadan (2) and Eko (1) recorded damage to
property/infrastructure due to explosions, fire outbreaks or acts of vandalism in
2024/Q2. The accident report showing all licensees with casualties during the
quarter is detailed in Figure 13.
14
14
12
10
9 9
Count
8
7 7
6 6 6
6
5 5
4 4
4
3 3 3 3
2 2 2 2 2 2
2
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Ibadan Eko TCN Jos Enugu aduna Ikeja Port Aba Abuja ano Others
Harcourt
Licensee
The breakdown of the causes of causalities arising from the accidents reported in
2024/Q2 is contained in Table 21.
The Commission has initiated investigations into all reported accidents and will
enforce appropriate actions against licensees where necessary. Furthermore, the
Commission continues to closely monitor the implementation of licensees’ accident
reduction strategy for the NESI. The Commission also implements various programs
aimed at improving the health and safety performance of the NESI.
In June 2024, the biannual Health and Safety Manager’s Meeting was held with
compliance and regulatory officers of licensees to discuss the reporting obligations
of licensees as well as health and safety matters. During the meeting, licensees'
scorecards on compliance with health and safety standards, forum office decisions,
and key performance indicators were discussed while highlighting areas of
improvement. The Commission shall continue to ensure that all licensees comply with
the subsisting performance standards in the NESI.
5.0 Appendix
Appendix I: Definition of Terms
Term Definition
Accident This is an incident that happens unexpectedly and unintentionally,
typically resulting in damage, injury, or fatality
Available Capacity This is the maximum rated output (MW) of a power plant over a specified
period declared by the operator when restricted by factors such as
feedstock availability, mechanical availability, environmental conditions,
etc.
Bilateral customers These are customers who purchase electricity directly from GenCos
without a middleman (e.g., bulk trader).
Cost-reflective tariff This is a tariff that if charged to consumers will allow for 100% recovery
of the costs incurred in the production, transmission, distribution, and
supply of electricity as well as guaranteeing regulatory approved profit
margin for the operators.
Energy offtake This is the process by which distribution companies receive and supply
energy to end-use consumers
Feedstock This refers to the type of fuel (e.g., gas, water) required to power a
generating plant
Installed capacity This is the maximum rated output of a power plant under specific
conditions designated by the manufacturer
Load factor This is a measure of the utilisation of a power plant's capacity, calculated
as the ratio of the average electricity generated over a period to the
maximum possible generation (assuming all the available capacity is
utilised).
Mini-grid This is an electricity supply system with its own power generation
capacity, supplying electricity to more than one customer and which can
operate in isolation from or be connected to a distribution network
Orders A series of directives/instructions issued by the Commission to Licensees
in response to a particular event/situation
Plant Availability This is a parameter that measures the proportion of a plant’s installed
Factor capacity which is available for the generation of electric energy.
Regulations A set of rules that the Commission may issue from time to time to optimise
the performance of licensees to give effect to the object of the EA 2023
Service-based tariff Service-based tariff is a pricing system under which consumers are
charged varying tariffs dependent on the average number of hours of
supply they receive per day.
Total Energy This refers to the total energy generated (GWh) by a power plant during
Generated the period under review
Appendix III: Monthly energy offtake and energy billed by DisCos in 2024/Q1 and 2024/Q2
Appendix IV: Monthly revenue performance and collection efficiency by DisCos in 2024/Q1 and 2024/Q2
DisCos Total Billing (₦’ Billion) Revenue Collected (₦’Billion) Collection Efficiency
2024/Q1 2024/Q2 2024/Q1 2024/Q2 2024/Q1 2024/Q2
(%) (%)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June Jan Feb Mar Apr May June
Abuja 19.03 18.66 20.60 28.70 27.84 27.94 15.55 16.28 16.77 22.92 22.97 24.29 83.36 83.07
Benin 10.89 8.82 9.67 13.29 14.23 13.71 7.61 7.31 7.53 11.03 10.65 12.27 76.39 82.35
Eko 21.25 15.83 19.43 27.41 30.87 27.16 16.30 15.71 16.72 24.93 23.92 26.37 86.24 88.03
Enugu 9.75 8.15 8.48 12.02 15.09 13.75 7.37 6.95 6.90 9.09 10.18 11.11 80.45 74.35
Ibadan 15.28 14.03 15.46 18.27 23.91 20.82 10.03 10.26 10.05 14.50 14.74 15.02 67.78 70.25
Ikeja 20.13 17.08 18.63 29.99 32.31 29.96 17.59 19.58 20.70 29.40 26.92 31.02 103.61 94.67
Jos 8.11 6.68 7.05 8.92 7.15 7.99 3.88 4.88 4.52 6.05 4.71 4.96 60.81 65.37
aduna 4.50 4.31 4.77 8.07 8.63 7.54 3.24 3.16 3.19 5.01 4.67 5.01 70.66 60.62
ano 7.39 6.90 7.28 12.53 13.25 11.54 5.05 4.35 4.19 6.66 6.83 8.41 63.09 58.71
Port Harcourt 10.04 8.50 9.14 14.01 14.36 13.64 6.62 6.52 7.24 10.78 10.35 11.46 73.66 77.59
Yola 4.42 4.04 4.10 3.54 1.98 3.08 1.99 1.95 1.50 1.10 1.81 1.87 43.03 55.67
All DisCos 130.83 113.05 124.66 176.79 189.65 177.18 95.26 97.01 99.33 141.51 137.80 151.83 79.11 79.31
Appendix V: DisCos monthly invoices & remittances to NBET in 2024/Q1 and 2024/Q2
Appendix VI: DisCos monthly invoices & remittances to MO in 2024/Q1 and 2024/Q2
Appendix VII: Domestic and international bilateral customers invoices & remittances to MO in 2024/Q2
April-24 May-24 June-24 2024/Q2 2024/Q2 Other
Remittances
(million)
Invoice Remittance Invoice Remittance Invoice Remittance Invoice Remittance Remittance
(million) (million) (million) (million) (million) (million) (million) (million) Performance
(%)
International Customers
PARAS-SBEE ($) 1.21 1.21 1.85 1.85 1.23 0.00 4.29 3.06 71.21 3.73
TRANSCORP-SBEE ($) 1.96 1.96 1.57 1.57 0.70 0.70 4.25 4.25 100.00 4.45
MAINSTREAM-NIGELEC ($) 1.20 1.20 1.30 1.30 1.09 0.00 3.59 2.50 69.72 4.71
ODU PANI-CEET ($) 1.47 0.00 1.14 0.00 0.85 0.00 3.47 0.00 0.00 3.76
Total 5.86 4.38 5.89 4.75 3.90 0.71 15.60 9.81 62.88 16.65
Bilateral Customers
MSTM/INNER GALAXY (₦)
MSTM/ AM IND. (₦)
MSTM/ AM INT. (₦)
MAINSTREAM/PRISM (₦) 369.27 369.27 449.20 449.20 391.31 391.31 1,209.78 1,209.78 100.00 1,147.67
MSTM ZEBERCED (₦)
MSTM/ADFV (₦)
NDPHC/WEEWOOD (₦) 32.72 0.00 37.45 0.00 29.61 0.00 99.78 0.00 0.00 0.00
NORTH SOUTH/STAR P (₦) 8.18 8.12 13.88 0.00 9.51 9.51 31.57 17.69 56.03 23.55
TRANS AMADI/ OAU (₦)
11.82 0.73 13.47 0.00 9.45 0.00 34.74 0.73 2.10 95.33
TRANS AMADI (FMPI) (₦)
NDPHC/SUNFLAG (₦)
13.77 0.00 15.59 0.00 12.92 0.00 42.28 0.00 0.00 0.00
OMOTOSHO II/PUL IT (₦)
ALAOJI GENCO/APLE (₦) 140.45 0.00 169.31 0.00 141.80 0.00 451.56 0.00 0.00 0.00
TAOPEX/ AM INT (₦)
26.39 26.39 41.33 41.33 38.39 0.00 106.11 67.72 63.82 0.00
TAOPEX/ AM STEEL (₦)
SAPELE/PHOENIX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.48 0.00 15.48 0.00 0.00 43.42
Total 602.60 403.78 732.4 490.53 640.81 400.82 1,991.30 1,295.13 65.55 1,309.97
Appendix VIII: Meter installation for all Frameworks (MAP, NMMP, Vendor and DisCo Financed)
Meters Meters Meters Meters installed Meters installed Meters Meters Meters Total
DisCos contracted installed in installed in in 2021 in 2022 installed in installed in installed in installations
2019 2020 2023 2024/Q1 2024/Q2 since 2019
Aba 24,000 - - - - 9,917 7,817 8,784 26,518
Abuja 1,000,475 63,925 105,253 87,987 83,494 105,154 21,493 11,733 479,039
Benin 664,646 1,169 11,154 72,838 6,771 34,344 10,455 3,510 140,241
Eko 283,178 5,422 32,353 64,618 44,577 36,484 4,637 810 189,260
Enugu 713,926 17,410 54,603 96,836 57,751 73,256 13,932 4,241 318,279
Ibadan 1,106,294 4,771 38,403 94,309 146,044 139,138 25,551 5,828 477,576
Ikeja 1,186,114 22,876 160,469 125,460 145,364 151,197 27,795 9,076 642,921
Jos 606,096 15 4,673 88,827 19,190 12,937 3,649 457 128,895
aduna 519,152 43 8,258 17,942 34,385 10,039 3,027 2,450 76,945
ano 562,747 22 3,314 80,969 3,476 2,056 199 474 90,510
Port 220,044 7,775 36,546 92,543 33,549 48,989 6,278 1,825 227,504
Harcourt
Yola 749,376 - 478 5,955 30,386 19,295 831 - 56,555
Total 7,612,048 123,428 455,504 828,284 604,987 642,806 125,664 49,188 2,854,243
Appendix XI: Meter installation through Vendor and DisCo Finance Frameworks as of 2024/Q2
Meters Meters Meters Meters Total Meters Meters Meters Meters Meters Meters Meters Total
installed installed in installed installed installations installed installed installed installed installed installed installed installations
DisCos in 2022 2023 in in in 2019 in in 2021 in 2022 in 2023 in in since 2019
2024/Q1 2024/Q2 2020 2024/Q1 2024/Q2
Appendix XIV: Category of complaints received at the NESI Call Centre in 2024/Q2
Credit Complaint Categories
Complaints Complaints Adjustment
DisCos Received Resolved (₦’000) Metering Interruption Voltage Loadshedding Billing Disconnection Delay Others Band
Aba 16 5 - 1 4 0 0 5 2 0 0 4
Abuja 714 99 - 31 114 7 0 113 16 1 9 423
Benin 101 22 3,617.59 15 39 5 0 35 4 0 0 3
Eko 1,039 189 3,577.67 216 259 15 1 266 32 3 12 235
Enugu 153 60 1,970.49 27 27 5 1 53 12 1 1 26
Ibadan 250 41 48,734.74 63 48 0 1 62 9 0 6 62
Ikeja 1,688 491 20,663.57 383 201 10 8 731 101 11 31 211
Jos 58 23 - 9 15 4 0 7 1 0 0 22
Kaduna 39 7 - 3 9 1 0 10 1 0 0 15
Kano 18 8 - 3 9 1 0 2 2 0 0 1
Port
Harcourt 164 32 - 24 50 8 0 42 9 1 3 27
Yola 17 5 - 0 5 1 0 6 1 0 1 3
All DisCos 4,257 982 29,878.07 775 780 57 11 1,332 190 17 63 1,032
Appendix XV: List and addresses of NERC Forum Offices as of June 2024
2024/Q1 2024/Q2
S/N Forum Offices Appeals Appeals Appeals Resolution Rate Appeals Appeals Appeals Resolution Rate
Received Resolved Pending Received Resolved Pending
1 Abakaliki, Ebonyi State 41 17 21 41.46% 66 42 18 63.64%
2 Abeokuta, Ogun State 122 42 33 34.43% 152 14 63 9.21%
3 Abuja, FCT 35 27 8 77.14% 45 30 15 66.67%
4 Ado-Ekiti 16 10 6 62.50% 19 11 8 57.89%
5 Asaba, Delta State 72 50 21 69.44% 51 34 15 66.67%
6 Awka, Anambra State 101 56 45 55.45% 149 103 46 69.13%
7 Bauchi, Bauchi State 6 6 0 100.00% 3 3 0 100.00%
8 Benin, Edo State 55 39 16 0.00% 60 53 7 0.00%
9 Calabar, C/Rivers State 3 3 0 0.00% 26 19 7 73.08%
10 Dutse, Jigawa State 27 17 10 62.96% 4 2 2 50.00%
11 Eko, Lagos State 7 5 2 71.43% 218 155 63 71.10%
12 Enugu, Enugu State 207 159 45 76.81% 204 83 76 40.69%
13 Gombe, Gombe State 201 82 68 40.80% 13 1 12 7.69%
14 Gusau, Zamfara State 12 0 11 0.00% 10 10 0 100.00%
15 Ibadan, Oyo State 8 2 6 25.00% 104 65 39 62.50%
16 Ikeja, Lagos State 142 114 28 80.28% 642 320 322 49.84%
17 Ilorin, Kwara State 537 240 297 44.69% 96 62 34 64.58%
18 Jos, Plateau State 60 26 34 43.33% 17 13 4 76.47%
19 Kaduna, Kaduna State 17 12 5 70.59% 28 17 0 60.71%
20 Kano, Kano State 22 13 7 59.09% 23 17 0 73.91%
21 Katsina, Katsina State 26 15 7 57.69% 4 3 1 75.00%
22 Kebbi, Kebbi State 3 1 2 33.33% 4 2 2 50.00%
23 Lafia, Nasarawa State 8 3 3 37.50% 10 4 6 40.00%
24 Lokoja, Kogi State 10 10 0 100.00% 5 3 2 0.00%
25 Makurdi, Benue State 5 3 2 0.00% 11 7 1 63.64%
26 Osogbo, Osun State 13 5 1 38.46% 365 173 192 47.40%
27 Owerri, Imo State 371 194 177 52.29% 26 18 8 69.23%
28 Port Harcourt, Rivers State 15 9 6 60.00% 83 57 24 68.67%
29 Sokoto, Sokoto State 69 57 8 82.61% 10 6 4 60.00%
30 Umuahia, Abia State 5 2 3 40.00% 12 6 6 50.00%
Umuahia 2, Abia State 9 5 4 55.56% 5 2 3 40.00%
31 Uyo, Akwa Ibom State 5 4 1 80.00% 152 104 48 68.42%
32 Yola, Adamawa State 176 148 27 84.09% 5 0 5 0.00%
All Forum Offices 2,429 1,398 904 57.55% 2,625 1,441 1,034 54.90%
Appendix XVII: Category of appeals received by Forum Offices in 2024/Q1 and 2024/Q2
2024/Q1 2024/Q2
Load Shedding
Load Shedding
Disconnection
Disconnection
Interruption
Interruption
Forum Office
Con. Delay
Con. Delay
Metering
Metering
Voltage
Voltage
Others
Others
Billing
Billing
Abakaliki, Ebonyi State 25 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 43 0 0 1 1 0 0 0
Abeokuta, Ogun State 48 1 0 1 16 5 0 9 60 2 0 1 22 19 0 15
Abuja, FCT 1 0 0 0 22 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 30 0 0 3
Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State 10 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 5 0 0 1
Asaba, Delta State 19 3 0 0 3 0 0 3 21 0 0 0 5 0 0 4
Awka, Anambra State 68 5 0 0 13 0 0 1 81 6 0 0 17 0 0 0
Bauchi, Bauchi State 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
Benin, Edo State 24 1 0 1 4 0 1 3 36 1 0 0 2 0 0 5
B/ ebbi, ebbi State 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Calabar, C/Rivers State 11 1 0 1 4 0 0 3 7 3 0 0 4 0 0 2
Dutse, Jigawa State 3 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Eko, Lagos State 53 13 0 5 73 0 1 7 68 10 0 13 65 0 1 16
Enugu, Enugu State 150 5 0 0 19 0 0 1 107 9 0 0 13 3 0 4
Gombe, Gombe State 4 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
Gusau, Zamfara State 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0
Ibadan, Oyo State 60 4 0 1 12 0 0 1 42 7 0 1 23 0 0 3
Ikeja, Lagos State 171 22 1 0 100 2 0 19 171 25 0 1 109 1 1 37
Ilorin, wara State 34 3 0 0 11 0 0 5 29 2 0 0 19 1 1 10
Jos, Plateau State 8 0 0 0 4 1 0 4 5 1 0 0 4 1 0 1
aduna, aduna State 5 5 0 0 1 0 0 2 6 4 0 0 4 0 0 7
ano, ano State 4 4 0 6 2 2 0 6 4 4 0 1 1 0 0 6
atsina, atsina State 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Lafia, Nasarawa State 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 1
Lokoja, ogi State 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
Makurdi, Benue State 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Osogbo, Osun State 158 2 0 0 81 0 0 5 94 7 0 0 70 0 0 17
Owerri, Imo State 6 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 8 7 0 0 3 0 0 2
P/Harcourt, Rivers State 38 5 0 0 13 4 0 4 56 5 0 1 8 1 0 4
Sokoto, Sokoto State 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 3
Umuahia, Abia State 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 1 0 1 0 0 1
Umuahia 2, Abia State 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2
Uyo, Akwa Ibom State 50 16 0 0 19 0 5 21 77 10 0 2 16 0 1 19
Yola, Adamawa State 7 0 0 0 11 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
All Forum Offices 985 95 2 15 427 14 9 106 962 107 2 21 434 26 4 164