Final Demo DLP in Philo
Final Demo DLP in Philo
I. Objectives
c. Show deeper understanding of prudence and realize the consequences of choices by reflecting on past
actions.
b. Materials: projector, laptop, paper, ball pen, Manila paper, pentel pen, notebook,
c. References:
Introduction to the Philosophy of the Human Person Christine Carmela R. Ramos, PhD
Pages 94 - 116
Introduction to the Philosophy of the Human Person Brenda B. Corpuz, BSE, MAEd, PhD et.al.
Pages 76 – 94
III. PROCEDURES:
- Good morning
- Good morning Sir!
- Thank you. Now, before you seat down, look around you and
make sure that your room is clean.
- Yes sir. ( The students follow the instruction)
“JUMBLED NO MORE”
You just have to rearrange the jumbled words and explain their
definition relative to our previous discussion:
Prudence, Sir
1. E-C-N-E-D-U-R-P (PRUDENCE)- Ability to regulate one’s
behaviour.
Equity, Sir
-Very good, class! You were able to recall the significant points of
the previous lesson. We will now talk about our topic for today.
"What can you hold in your hand, but cannot be seen, and is only
truly valuable when you give it away?
Freedom, Sir
-(The teacher will post and give the definition of freedom to the
students)
Definition:
-The absence of constraint, coercion, or necessity in action or
choice
D. Lesson proper
“Who am I?”
(The teacher will show images of different philosophers who are
related to the lesson and the students will guess each one.)
Aristotle, Sir
Very well, class. Since we are able to have some highlight about
these prominent people in Philosophy, I want you to dig deeper
and figure out their connection to our topic.
-Now, I’m going to divide the class into 6 groups. Each group will
receive a piece of paper containing the task. You will be given 5
to 10-minute preparation. Presentation and explanation will only
last for 3 minutes per group. Note: Groups shall select their
leader, secretary and the representative who will discuss your
presentations in front of the class.
(The teacher will group the students into 6 and give each group
a task. The teacher will also present the rubric to the students)
Alright! Again, I would like to remind you that each reporter will
only consume three minutes to explain. Do you get it class?
Yes sir!
Power of Volition
Aristotle's theory of volition, or the power of
choice, was a key part of his ethics and virtue
ethics. He believed that volition was a rational
process that involved deliberation and choice.
Very nice! Let us give also group 4 five claps for their
presentation.
(Students will clap)
Next is group 5.
And last but not the least is group 6. Let us hear their report.
b. Love is freedom
God create us all. Human beings have the unique power to
change themselves and the things around them for the better.
Eternal law, natural law, human law, and divine law are four
types of law that St. Thomas Aquinas used to explain the world.
Eternal law
God's plan for the universe, which governs all things
The blueprint that directs all creation towards its ultimate
end.
Natural law
An innate universal command to do good and avoid evil
A participation in the Eternal Law that leads to primary
precepts
A way to explain the world and the place of humans within
it
Human law
Laws created by humans to capture the truths of the
Natural Laws
Laws made by humans to guide society towards the
common good
Divine law
God's rules given by scripture, such as the Ten
Commandments
Divine positive law from religious authorities
c. Spiritual freedom
As humans, we are both material and spiritual. We have
conscience because of our spirituality. God is love and Love is our
destiny. St. Thomas Aquinas believed that spiritual freedom is
the ability to seek universal goodness freely and in accordance
with human nature. He believed that reason, law, and grace are
essential to freedom.
d. Individual freedom
Represents the existentialist. Jean Paul Sartre claims that we
have limitless freedom because the world is empty and that we
have absolute freedom to choose our values and create the kind
of world we desire. In this context, Sartre argues that there is no
objective morality, moral codes, or laws, and no God determines
the essence of man.
I can see that most of you understood our topic for today. Now,
can you give the importance of knowing or learning about
freedom and the consequences of your actions?
D. Application
“Talk to Sartre”
Any
thoughts?
Questions:
1. Who among you can give his/her views about my belief?
2. How important is freedom of choice to you as an individual?
-(Students’ answer may vary)
Very good!
E. Developing mastery
F. Evaluation
Analyze the given situations below. Identify if it falls to Power of Volition, Love is Freedom, Spiritual Freedom,
Individual Freedom, Social Contract (Hobbes) or Social Contract (Rousseau).
1. A God-fearing and intelligent boy willing to help classmates to learn by teaching them what he knows while
doing it the right way.
2. Citizens aiming for peace and order are not questioning the curfew implemented by the government even if it
was set from 7:00 pm to 5:00 am the next day.
3. A student who is behind their coursework and tempted to put it off, but decides to focus and work diligently
through the night to complete the assignment.
4. A spouse who encourages her partner to travel solo for a period of time to experience personal growth and self-
discovery, even though she may miss him while he’s gone.
5. Citizens actively participating in the political process and contributing to the creation of laws that reflect the
general will.
6. Each and every one of us has the right to health, education, and an adequate standard of living.
Answers:
1. Spiritual Freedom
2. Social Contract (Hobbes)
3. Power of Volition
4. Love is Freedom
5. Social Contract (Rousseau)
6. Individual Freedom
G. ASSIGNMENT
Read articles about the term “Intersubjectivity” and prepare a 5-sentence paragraph explaining your own
interpretation of the word.
Prepared by:
Arvin. M. Romualdo
Applicant