CLYDE KLUCKHOHN

In this selection, written more than half a century ago, Clyde Kluckhohn explains the an thropological concept of culture in a way that is eminently understandable for the beginning student of comparative cultures. Riferring to culture as a "design for living," Kluckhohn, whofor much if his career was the leading authority on the Navajo, used the anthropologi cal perspective to explain what most nonanthropologists at the time considered to be "queer customs." He examined culture by showing how it is different from biological influences on our behavior, how culture influences biological processes, how it is learned rather than being genetically transmitted, and how it functions to help people adapt to their environment. Even though some of his riferences are today politically incorrect (for example, the use of such terms as primitive and heathen), Kluckhohn's piece serves as a valuable reminder that the study of other cultures allows us to better understand our own culture.

hy do the Chinese dislike milk and milk products? Why would the Japan ese die willingly in a Banzai charge that seemed senseless to Americans? Why do some na tions trace descent through the father, others through the mother, still others through both par ents? Not because different peoples have different instincts, not because they were destined by God or Fate to different habits, not because the weather is different in China and Japan and the United States. Sometimes shrewd common sense has an answer that is close to that of the anthro pologist: "because they were brought up that way." By "culture" anthropology means the total life way of a people, the social legacy the individ ual acquires from his group. Or culture can be re garded as that part of the environment that is the creation of man. This technical term has a wider meaning than the "culture" of history and literature. A

humble cooking pot is as much a cultural prod uct as is a Beethoven sonata. In ordinary speech a man of culture is a man who can speak lan guages other than his own, who is familiar with history, literature, philosophy, or the fine arts. In some cliques that definition is still narrower. The cultured person is one who can talk about James Joyce, Scarlatti, and Picasso. To theanthropolo gist, however, to be human is to be cultured. There is culture in general, and then there are the specific cultures such as Russian, American, British, Hottentot, Inca. The general abstract notion services to remind us that we cannot ex plain acts solely in terms of the biological prop erties of the people concerned, their individual past experience, and the immediate situation. The past experience of other men in the form of culture enters into almost every event. Each specific culture constitutes a kind of blueprint for all oflife's activities.

From M.rrorf.r Man: AlltlJropology alld Modem Life by Clyde Kluckhohn, pp. 17-27. Used with pennis~ion.

ARTICLE 2

QUEER CUSTOMS

One of the interesting things about human beings is that they try to understand themselves and their own behavior. While this has been par ticularly true of Europeans in recent times, there is no group which has not developed a scheme or schemes to explain man's actions. To the insis tent human query "why?" the most exciting illu mination anthropology has to offer is that of the concept of culture. Its explanatory importance is comparable to categories such as evolution in bi ology, gravity in physics, disease in medicine. A good deal of human behavior can be understood, and indeed predicted, if we know a people's de sign for living. Many acts are neither accidental nor due to personal pecularities nor caused by su per'na1tural forces nor simply mysterious. Even those of us who pride ourselves on out individu alism follow most of the time a pattern not of our own making. We brush our teeth on arising. We put on pants-not a loincloth or a grass skirt. We eat three meals a day-not four or five or two. We sleep in a bed-not in a hammock or on a sheep pelt. I do not have to know the individual and his life history to be able to predict these and countless other regularities, including many in the thinking process, of all Americans who are not in carcerated in jails or hospitals for the insane. To the American woman a system of plural wives seems "instinctively" abhorrent. She can not understand how any woman can fail to be <jealous and uncomfortable if she must share her husband with other women. She feels it "unnat ural" to accept such a situation. On the other hand, a Koryak woman of Siberia, for e'-ample, would find it hard to understand how a woman could be so selfish and so undesirous of femine companionship in the home as to wish to restrict her husband to one mate. Some years ago I met in New York City a young man who did not speak a word of English and was obviously bewildered by American ways. By "blood" he was as American- as you or I, for his parents had gone from Indiana to China as missionaries. Orphaned in infancy, he was reared by a Chinese family in a remote village. All who met him found him more Chinese than Ameri

can. The facts of his blue eyes and light hair were less impressive than a Chinese style of gait, Chi nese arm and hand movements, Chinese facial ex pression, and Chinese modes of thought, The biological heritage was American, but the cultural training had been Chinese. He returned to China. Another example of another kind: I once knew a trader's wife in Arizona who took a some what devilish interest in producing a cultural reac tion. Guests who came her way were often served delicious sandwiches filled with a meat that seemed to be neither chicken nor tuna fish yet was reminiscent of both. To queries she gave no reply until each had eaten his fill. She then explained that what they had eaten was not chicken, not tuna fish, but the rich, white flesh of freshly killed rattlesnakes. The response was instantaneous vomiting, often violent vomiting. A biological process is caught in a cultural web. A highly intelligent teacher with long and successful experience in the public schools of Chicago was finishing her first year in an Indian school. When asked how her Navaho pupils com pared in intelligence with Chicago youngsters, she replied, "Well, I just don't knOw. Sometimes the Indians seem just as bright. At other times they just act like dumb animals. The other night we had a dance in the high school. I saw a boy who is one of the best students in my English class standing offby himself. So I took him over to a pretty girl and told them to dance. But they just stood there with their heads down. They would n't even say anything." I inquired if she knew whether or not they were members of the same clan. "What difference would that make?" "How would you feel about getting into bed with your brother?" The teacher walked off in a huff, but, actually, the two cases were quite com parable in principle. To the Indian the type of bodily contact involved in our social dancing has a directly sexual connotation. The incest taboos between members of the same clan are as severe as between true brothers and sisters. The shame of the Indians at the suggestion that a clan brother and sister should dance and the indigna tion of the white teacher at the idea that she

SECTION I PERSPECTIVES ON CULTURE

should share a bed with an adult brother repre sent equally nonrational responses, culturally standardized unreason. All this does not mean that there is no such thing as raw human nature. The very fact that certain of the same institutions are found in all known societies indicates that at bottom all human beings are very much alike. The files of the Cross-Cultural Survey at Yale University are organized according to categories such as "marriage ceremonies," "life crisis rites," "in cest taboos." At least seventy-five of these cate gories are represented in every single one of the hundreds of cultures analyzed. This is hardly surprising. The members of all human groups have about the same biological equipment. All men undergo the same poignant life experi ences such as birth, helplessness, illness, old age, and death. The biological potentialities of the species are the blocks with which cultures are built. Some patterns of every culture crystallize around focuses provided by the inevitables of biology: the difference between the sexes, the presence of persons of different ages, the vary ing physical strength and skill of individuals. The facts of nature also limit culture forms. No culture provides patterns for jumping over trees or for eating iron ore. There is thus no "either-or" between nature and that special form of nurture called culture. Culture determinism is as one-sided as biological determinism. The two factors are interdepen dent. Culture arises out of human nature, and its forms are restricted both by man's biology and by natural laws. It is equally true that culture chan nels biological processes-vomiting, weeping, fainting, sneezing, the daily habits of food intake and waste elimination. When a man eats, he is reacting to an internal "drive," namely, hunger contractions consequent upon the lowering of blood sugar, but his precise reaction to these in ternal stimuli cannot be predicted by physiologi cal knowledge alone. Whether a healthy adult feels hungry twice, three times, or four times a day and the hours at which this feeling recurs is a question of culture. vVhat he eats is of course lim

ited by availability, but is also partly regulated by culture. It is a biological fact that some types of berries are poisonous; it is a cultural fact that, a few generations ago, most Americans considered tomatoes to be poisonous and refused to eat them. Such selective, discriminative use of the environment is characteristically cultural. In a still more general sense, too, the process of eating is channeled by culture. Whether a man eats to live, lives to eat, or merely eats and lives is only in part an individual matter, for there are also cultural trends. Emotions are physiological events. Cer tain situations will evoke fear in people from any culture. But sensations of pleasure, anger, and lust may be stimulated by cultural cues that would leave unmoved someone who has been reared in a different social tradition. Except in the case of newborn babies and of individuals born with clear-cut structural or functional abnormalities we can observe innate endowments only as modified by cultural train ing. In a hospital in New Mexico where Zuni In dian, Navaho Indian, and white American babies are born, it is possible to classifY the newly ar rived infants as unusually active, average, and quiet. Some babies from each "racial" group will fall into each category, though a higher propor tion of the white babies will fall into the unusu ally active class. But if a Navaho baby, a Zuni baby, and a white baby-all classified as unusually active at birth-are again observed at the age of two years, the Zuni baby will no longer seem given to quick and restless activity-as compared with the white child-though he may seem so as compared with the other Zunis of the same age. The Navaho child is likely to fall in between as contrasted with the Zuni and the white, though he will probably still seem more active than the average Navaho youngster. It was remarked by many observers in the Japanese relocation centers that Japanese who were born and brought up in this country, espe cially those who were reared apart from any large colony of Japanese, resemble in behavior their white neighbors much more closely than they do their own parents who were educated in Japan.

pI

10
th
III

IS

Cl

ca ne ul fit
m

su ila gr TI In laJ pr in, me

su} co
In

as of an' the an, kn the tiv: "T to wo sist are tifi

the

-------------

ARTICLE 2

QUEER CUSTOMS

.s b. e e o
;e
lr
.0

I have said "culture channels biological processes." It is more accurate to say "the bio logical functioning of individuals is modified if they have been trained in certain ways and not in others." Culture is not a disembodied force. It is created and transmitted by people. However, culture, like well-known concepts of the physi cal sciences, is a convenient abstraction. One never sees gravity. One sees bodies falling in reg ular ways. One never sees an electromagnetic field. Yet certain happenings that can be seen may be given a neat abstract formulation by as suming that the electromagnetic field exists. Sim ilarly, one never sees culture as such. What is seen are regularities in the behavior or artifacts of a group that has adhered to a common tradition. The regularities in style and technique of ancient Inca tapestries or stone axes from Melanesian is lands are due to the existence of mental blue prints for the group. Culture is a way of thinking, feeling, believ ing. It is the group's knowledge stored up (in memories of men; in books and objects) for fu ture use. We study the products of this "mental" activity: the overt behavior, the speech and ges tures and activities of people, and the tangible re sults of these things such as tools, houses, cornfields, and what not. It has been customary in lists of "culture traits" to include such things as watches or lawbooks. This is a convenient way of thinking about them, but in the solution of any important problem we must remember that they, in themselves, are nothing but metals, paper, and ink. What is important is that some men know how to make them, others set a value on them, are unhappy without them, direct their ac tivities in relation to them, or disregard them. It is only a helpful shorthand when we say "The cultural patterns of the Zulu were resistant to Christianization." In the directly observable world of course, it was individual Zulus who re sisted. N evertpeless, if we do not forget that we are speaking at a high level of abstraction, it is jus tifiable to speak of culture as a cause. One may compare the practice of saying "syphilis caused the extinction of the native population of the is

land." Was it "syphilis" or "syphilis germs" or "human beings who were carriers of syphilis?" "Culture," then, is "a theory." But if a theory is not contradicted by any relevant fact and if it helps us to understand a mass of otherwise chaotic facts, it is useful. Darwin's contribution was much less the accumulation of new knowl edge than the creation of a theory which put in order data already known. An accumulation of facts, however large, is no more a science than a pile of bricks is a house. Anthropology's demon stration that the most weird set of customs has a consistency and an order is comparable to mod ern psychiatry's showing that there is meaning and purpose in the apparently incoherent talk of the insane. In fact, the inability of the older psy chologies and philosophies to account for the strange behavior of madmen and heathens was the principal factor that forced psychiatry and an thropology to develop theories of the uncon scious and of culture. Since culture is an abstraction, it is important not to confuse culture with society. A "society" refers to a group of people who interact more with each other than they do with other individuals who cooperate with each other for the attainment of certain ends. You can see and indeed count the individuals who make up a society. A "culture" refers to the distinctive ways of life of such a group of people. Not all social events are culturally pat terned. New types of circumstances arise for which no cultural solutions have as yet been devised. A culture constitutes a storehouse of the pooled learning of the group. A rabbit starts life with some innate responses. He can learn from his own experience and perhaps from observing other rabbits. A human infant is born with fewer instincts and greater plasticity. His main task is to learn the answers that persons he will never see, persons long dead, have worked out. Once he has learned the formulas supplied by the culture of his group, most of his behavior becomes almost as automatic and unthinking as if it were instinc tive. There is a tremendous amount of intelli gence behind the making of a radio, but not much is required to learn to turn it on.

10

SECTION I PERSPECTIVES ON CULTURE

The members of all human societies face some of the same unavoidable dilemmas, posed by biol ogy and other facts of the human situation. This is why the basic categories of all cultures are so simi lar. Human culture without language is unthink able. No culture fails to provide for aesthetic expression and aesthetic delight. Every culture supplies standardized orientations toward the deeper problems, such as death. Every culture is designed to perpetuate the group and its solidarity, to meet the demands of individuals for an orderly way of life and for satisfaction of biological needs. However, the variations on these basic themes are numberless. Some languages are built up out of twenty basic sounds, others out of forty. Nose plugs were considered beautiful by the predynas tic Egyptians but are not by the modern French. Puberty is a biological fact. But one culture ig nores it, another prescribes informal instructions about sex but no ceremony, a third has impres sive rites for girls only, a fourth for boys and girls. In this culture, the first menstruation is welcomed as a happy, natural event; in that culture the at mosphere is full of dread and supernatural threat. Each culture dissects nature according to its own system of categories. The Navaho Indians apply the same word to the color of a robin's egg and to that of grass. A psychologist once assumed that this meant a difference in the sense organs, that Navahos didn't have the physiological equipment to distinguish "green" from "blue." However, when he showed them objects of the two colors and asked them if they were exactly the same col ors, they looked at him with astonishment. His dream of discovering a new type of color blind ness was shattered. Every culture must deal with the sexual in stinct. Some, however, seek to deny all sexual ex pression before marriage, whereas a Polynesian adolescent who was not promiscuous would be distinctly abnormal. Some cultures enforce life long monogamy, others, like our own, tolerate serial monogamy; in still other cultures, two or more women may be joined to one man or sev eral men to a single woman. Homosexuality has been a permitted pattern in the Greco-Roman

world, in parts of Islam, and in various primitive tribes. Large portions of the population of Tibet, and of Christendom at some places and periods, have practiced completely celibacy. To us mar riage is first and foremost an arrangement be tween two individuals. In many more societies marriage is merely one facet of a complicated set of reciprocilies, economic and otherwise, be tween two fAmilies or two clans. The essence of the cultural process is selectiv ity. The selection is only exceptionally conscious and rational. Cultures are like Topsy. They just grew. Once, however, a way of handling a situa tion becomes institutionalized, there is ordinarily great resistance to change or deviation. When we speak of" our sacred beliefs," we mean of course that they are beyond criticism and that the per son who suggests modification or abandonment" must be punished. No person is emotionally in different to his culture. Certain cultural premises may become totally out of accord with a new factual situation. Leaders may recognize this and reject the old ways in theory. Yet their emotional loyalty continues in the face of reason because of the intimate conditionings of early childhood. A culture is learned by individuals as the re sult of belonging to some particular group, and it constitutes that part oflearned behavior which is shared with others. It is our social legacy, as con trasted with our organic heredity. It is one of the important factors which permits us to live to gether in an organized society, giving us ready made solutions to' our problems, helping us to predict the behavior of others, and permitting others to know what to expect of us. Culture regulates our lives at every turn. From the moment we are born until we die there is, whether we are conscious of it or not, constant pressure upon us to follow certain types ofbehav ior that other men have created for us. Some paths we follow willingly, others we follow because we know no other way, still others we deviate from or go back to most unwillingly. Mothers of small children know how unnaturally most of this comes to us-how little regard we have, until we are "culturalized," for the "proper" place, time,

and ing, nois. of re livin

liokE
Rut tion that I adju to 01 as w, that safe ghos of t1 Cult mea: grou be II biol< exan they
fI

cultt valw phys the ( adap to be clost cons

is alt featt thrOl tive j

will how to d man' tent. hors, Fron

ARTICLE 2

QUEER CUSTOMS

11

and manner for certain acts such as eating, excret is positively irrational. But the act has the latent ing, sleeping, getting dirty, and making loud function of maintaining the c~wboy's prestige in noises. But by more or less adhering to a system the terms of his own subculture. One can in of related designs for carrying out all the acts of stance the buttons on the sleeve of a man's coat, living, a group of men and women feel themselves our absurd English spelling, the use of capital let ters, and a host of other apparently nonfunc linked together by a powerful chain of sentiments. Ruth Benedict gave an almost complete defini tional customs. They serve mainly the latent tion of the concept when she said, "Culture is function of assisting individuals to maintain their that which binds men together." security by preserving continuity with the past and by making certain sectors of life familiar and It is true any culture is a set of techniques for adjusting both to the external environment and , predictable. Every culture is a precipitate of history. In to other men. However, cultures create problems more than one sense history is a sieve. Each cul as well as solve them. If the lore of a people states ture embraces those aspects of the past which, that frogs are dangerous creatures, or that it is fot safe to go about at night because of witches or usually in altered form and with altered meanings, live on in the present. Discoveries and inventions, ghosts, threats are posed which do not arise out of the inexorable facts of the external world. both material and ideological, are constantly Cultures produce needs as well as provide a being made available to a group through its his torical contacts with other peoples or being cre means of fulfilling them. There exists for every ated by its own members. However, only those group culturally defined, acquired drives that may be more powerful in ordinary daily life than the that fit the total immediate situation in meeting biologically inborn drives. Many Americans, for the group's needs for survival or in promoting the example, will work harder for "success" than psychological adjustment of individuals will be they will for sexual satisfaction. come part of the culture. The process of culture building may be regarded as an addition to man's Most groups elaborate certain aspects of their culture far beyond maximum utility or survival innate biological capacities, an addition providing value. In other words, not all culture promotes instruments which enlarge, or may even substi physical survival. At times, indeed, it does exactly tute for, biological functions, and to a degree the opposite. Aspects of culture which once were compensating for biological limitations-as in en suring that death does not always result in the loss adaptive may persist long after they have ceased to be useful. An analysis of any culture will dis to humanity of what the deceased has learned. close many features which cannot possibly be Culture is like a map. Just as a map isn't the construed as adaptations to the total environment territory but an abstract representation of a par in which the group now finds itself. However, it ticular area, so also a culture is an abstract de is altogether likely that these apparently useless scription of trends toward uniformity in the words, deeds, and artifacts of a human group. If a features represent survivals, with modifications through time, of cultural forms which were adap map is accurate and you can read it, you won't get lost; if you know a culture, you will know tive in one or another previous situation. Any cultural practice must be functional or it your way around in the life of a society. Many ed will disappear before long. That is, it must some ucated people have the notion that culture ap how contribute to the survival of the society or plies only to exotic ways of life or to societies to the adjustment of the individual. However, where relative simplicity and relative homogene ity prevail. Some sophisticated missionaries, for many cultural functions are not manifest but la example, will use the anthropological conception tent. A cowboy will walk three miles to catch a in discussing the special modes of living of South horse which he then rides one mile to the store. Sea Islanders, but seem amazed at the idea that it From the point of view of manifest function this

12

SECTION I

PERSPECTIVES ON CUtlURE

could be applied equally to inhabitants of New York City. And social workers in Boston will talk about the culture of a colorful and well-knit im migrant group but boggle at applying it to the behavior of staff members in the social-service agency itself. In the primitive society the correspondence between the habits of individuals and the customs of the community is ordinarily greater. There is probably some truth in what an old Indian once said, "In the old days there was no law; every body did what was right." The primitive tends to find happiness in the fulfillment of intricately involuted cultural patterns; the modern mo~ often tends to feel the pattern as repressive to his individuality. It is also true that in a complex stratified society there are numerous exceptions to generalizations made about the culture as a whole. It is necessary to study regional, class, and occupational subcultures. Primitive cultures have greater stability than ,modern cultures; they change-but less rapidly. However, modern men also are creators and carriers of culture. Only in some respects are they influenced differently from primitives by culture. Moreover, there are such wide variations in primitive cultures that any black-and-white contrast between the primitive and the civilized is altogether fictitious. The distinction which is most generally true lies in the field of conscious philosophy. The publication of Paul Radin's Primitive Man as a Philosopher did much toward destroying the myth that an abstract analysis of experience was a peculiarity of literate societies.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
1. What does Kluckhohn mean when he says that "culture channels biological processes"? Can you think of any contemporary examples of this principle? 2. What is meant by the nature-nurture debate? 3. The title of the book from which this selection is taken is Mirror for Man. What is tJ;1e meaning of this title?

RESOURCES ON THE INTERNET

You can find further relevant readings by search ing InfoTrac College Edition, an online library with access to thousands of scholarly and popular pe riodicals. Below are suggested search terms for this article: custom trait environment

Anthropology Online: Wadsworth's

(http://anthropology.wadsworth.com)

The Wadsworth Anthropology Resource Center contains a wealth of information and useful tools for students including information on careers in anthropology.