Cognitive Psy
Cognitive Psy
Visual Search
● The observer must find a target in a visual display that has numerous distractors. In
some cases, our lives may depend on accurate visual searches.
● Jeremy Wolfe and his colleagues (2005) found that people are much more accurate in
ID a target if it appears frequently.
● If the target appears (in a visually complex background) on 50% of the trials, participants
missed their target 7% of the time.
● When the same target appeared in this same complex background on only 1% of the
trials, participants missed the target 30% of the time.
Memory
Stages of memory:
Encode, storage/retention and retrieval.
● Ability to remember info, experiences and people.
● Storage is a passive process of retaining info in the brain, whether sensory, STM or
LTM.
● Each if these different stage of memory function as a sort of filter that best helps protects
us from flood of information that confront us on a daily basis, avoiding overload of info
and helping to keep us sane.
● The more the info is repeated or used, the more likely it is to be retained in LTP.
● Fill incomplete data
STM
● German psychologist Ebbinghaus first described primacy and recency effect in the late
19 century as part of the serial position effect in his memory studies.
● Brown-Peterson Task.
● 20 seconds
● Interference ( proactive and retroactive)
● Trace decay
LTM
● Place for storing large amounts of info for indefinite periods if time.
● Mental treasure chest or scrapbook.
● Explicit and implicit.
● Semantic and episodic
● Thomas Landauer
● Cerebral cortex has 10(13) synapses, so some believe that human memory can hold
10(13) distinct bits of information.
● Another estimate is 10(20) buts, estimated number of neural impulses.
● Landauer argued that bith the estimates are probably too high: not every neural impulse
results in memory.
● He came to an estimate of about 1 billion bits for an adult at midlife (35 years old).
●
LTM Coding
● Errors made while recalling information from from LTM are likely to be due to semantic
confusion.
● Baddeley (1976) concluded that the following generalisation, although not absolute; is
roughly true; semantic similarity affects LTM.
● Kagdila
● Bahrick (84) test 733 adults who had taken or were taking a high school or university
course in Spanish.
● For the first 3 years after completing Spanish study, participant’s recall declined.
● But for the next three decades, forgettting curve was flats, suggesting no further loss of
info.
● It only showed decline after 35 years.
● Permastore State: Refers to highly stable and enduring for of memory retention, where
info remains accessible fir extended period, often a lifetime, with minimal loss.
LTM Forgetting
● Herman Ebbinghaus
● Nonsense syllables
● Experiments on the number of repetitions needed for perfect recall, the nature if
forgetting, the effects of fatigue on learning, and effects of widely spread versus closely
spaced practiced.
● “Forgetting curve”
Categorisation
Encoding specificity
Context Effect
● Memory retrieval is more effective when an individual’s internal state at retrieval matches
the state at encoding.
Working Memory
Fergus Craik and Robert Lockhart proposed LOP Model of memory, which suggestd that
memory retention on how deeply information is processed:
Depths of Processing:
● Shallow Processing involves encoding information based on surface level features
such as sound or appearance. This leads to weaker memory recall.
● Deep Processing involves meaningful analysis, suchj as understanding, making
connections and relating information to existing knowledge, resulting in stronger memory
recall.
Distinctiveness and Elaboration:
● Unique and well differentiated information is easier to remember.
● Connecting new info to prior knowledge enhances recall.
Self Reference Effect
Memory is improved when
Levels of processing