0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views59 pages

Posets

The document discusses the concepts of partial orders and lattices, focusing on their definitions, properties, and applications in computing properties of programs. It provides examples of partial orderings, Hasse diagrams, and extremal elements, as well as the conditions for a structure to be considered a lattice. Additionally, it explores complete lattices and their significance in the context of subsets and bounds.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views59 pages

Posets

The document discusses the concepts of partial orders and lattices, focusing on their definitions, properties, and applications in computing properties of programs. It provides examples of partial orderings, Hasse diagrams, and extremal elements, as well as the conditions for a structure to be considered a lattice. Additionally, it explores complete lattices and their significance in the context of subsets and bounds.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 59

Partial orders, Lattices, etc.

In our context…
• We aim at computing properties on programs
• How can we represent these properties? Which kind of algebraic
features have to be satisfied on these representations?
• Which conditions guarantee that this computation terminates?
Motivating Example (1)
• Consider the renovation of the building of a firm.
In this process several tasks are undertaken
– Remove asbestos
– Replace windows
– Paint walls
– Refinish floors
– Assign offices
– Move in office furniture
– …
Motivating Example (2)
• Clearly, some things had to be done before others could begin
– Asbestos had to be removed before anything (except
assigning
offices)
– Painting walls had to be done before refinishing floors
to avoid ruining them, etc.
• On the other hand, several things could be done concurrently:
– Painting could be done while replacing the windows
– Assigning offices could be done at anytime before
moving in office furniture
• This scenario can be nicely modeled using partial orderings
Partial Orderings: Definitions
• Definitions:
– A relation R on a set S is called a partial order if it is
• Reflexive
• Antisymmetric
• Transitive
– A set S together with a partial ordering R is called a
partially ordered set (poset, for short) and is denote
(S,R)
• Partial orderings are used to give an order to sets that may
not have a natural one
• In our renovation example, we could define an ordering
such that (a,b)R if ‘a must be done before b can be
done’
Partial Orderings: Notation
• We use the notation:
– a p b, when (a,b)R
– a p b, when (a,b)R and ab
• The notation p is not to be mistaken for “less than” (p versus ≤)
• The notation p is used to denote any partial ordering
Comparability: Definition

• Definition:
– The elements a and b of a poset (S, p) are called comparable
if
either apb or bpa.
– When for a,bS, we have neither apb nor bpa, we say
that a,b are incomparable
• Consider again our renovation example
– Remove Asbestos p ai for all activities ai except assign
offices
– Paint walls p Refinish floors
– Some tasks are incomparable: Replacing windows can
be done before, after, or during the assignment of
offices
Total orders: Definition
• Definition:
– If (S,p) is a poset and every two elements of S are
comparable,
S is called a totally ordered set.
– The relation p is said to be a total order
• Example
– The relation “less than or equal to” over the set of
integers (Z, ) since for every a,bZ, it must be the
case that ab or ba
– What happens if we replace  with <?

The relation < is not reflexive, and (Z,<) is not a poset


Hasse Diagrams
• Like relations and functions, partial orders have a convenient
graphical representation: Hasse Diagrams
– Consider the digraph representation of a partial order
– Because we are dealing with a partial order, we know
that the relation must be reflexive and transitive
– Thus, we can simplify the graph as follows
• Remove all self loops
• Remove all transitive edges
• Remove directions on edges assuming that they are
oriented upwards
– The resulting diagram is far simpler
Hasse Diagram: Example

a a5
a a
5
4 4

a a
2 a 2 a3
3

a a
1 1
Hasse Diagrams: Example (1)
• Of course, you need not always start with the complete
relation in the partial order and then trim everything.
• Rather, you can build a Hasse Diagram directly from
the partial order
• Example: Draw the Hasse Diagram
– for the following partial ordering: {(a,b) | a|b }
– on the set {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, 15, 20, 30, 60}
– (these are the divisors of 60 which form the basis of
the ancient Babylonian base-60 numeral system)
Hasse Diagram: Example (2)

6
0

1 2 3
2 0 0

4 6 1 15
0

2 3 5

1
Example

c d e f

a b

L= {a,b,c,d,e,f,g}
p ={(a,c), (a,e), (b,d), (b,f), (c,g), (d,g), (e,g), (f,g)}RT

(L, p) is a partial order


Example

6 L= N (natural numbers)
5 p ={(0,1), (1,2), (2,3), (3,4), (4,5),…}RT
4
3 (L, p) is a totally ordered set (infinite)
2
1
0
Example

9
8
7
L= N (natural numbers)
6
p ={(n,m):  k such that m=n*k}
5
4 (L, p) is a partially ordered set (infinite)
3
2
Example
• On the same set E={1,2,3,4,6,12} we can define
different partial orders:

12 12
12
6 6
4 6 4 4
3
3 2 2
2 1 3
1 1
Example

• All possible partial orders on a set of three


elements (modulo renaming)
Extremal Elements: Summary
We will define the following terms:
• A maximal/minimal element in a poset (S, p)
• The maximum (greatest)/minimum (least) element of a poset
(S, p)
• An upper/lower bound element of a subset A of a poset (S, p)
• The greatest lower/least upper bound element of a
subset A of a poset (S, p)
Extremal Elements: Maximal
• Definition: An element a in a poset (S, p) is called
maximal if it is not less than any other element in S. That
is: (bS (apb))
• If there is one unique maximal element a, we call it the
maximum element (or the greatest element)
Extremal Elements: Minimal
• Definition: An element a in a poset (S, p) is called minimal if
it is not greater than any other element in S. That is:
(bS (bpa))
• If there is one unique minimal element a, we call it the
minimum element (or the least element)
Extremal Elements: Upper Bound
• Definition: Let (S,p) be a poset and let AS. If u is an
element of S such that a p u for all aA then u is an upper
bound of A
• An element x that is an upper bound on a subset A and is
less than all other upper bounds on A is called the least
upper bound on A. We abbreviate it as lub.
Extremal Elements: Lower Bound
• Definition: Let (S,p) be a poset and let AS. If l is an
element of S such that l p a for all aA then l is an lower
bound of A
• An element x that is a lower bound on a subset A and is
greater than all other lower bounds on A is called the
greatest lower bound on A. We abbreviate it glb.
Example

N x N

(x1,y1) N x N (x2,y2)  x 1 N x 2 
y 1 N y 2
Example

N ´
N upper bounds of Y

lub(Y)

glb(Y)

lower bounds of Y
(x1,y1) N x N (x2,y2)  x 1 N x 2 
y 1 N y 2
Extremal Elements: Example 1
c d

a b

What are the minimal, maximal, minimum, maximum elements?

• Minimal: {a,b}
• Maximal: {c,d}
• There are no unique minimal or maximal elements,
thus no minimum or maximum
Extremal Elements: Example 2
Give lower/upper
{d,e,f}
bounds & glb/lub of the
sets: • Lower bounds: , thus no glb
• Upper bounds: , thus no lub
{d,e,f}, {a,c} and
{b,d}

{a,c}
g i h
• Lower bounds: , thus no glb
• Upper bounds: {h}, lub: h

d e f
{b,d}
• Lower bounds: {b}, glb: b
b
a c • Upper bounds: {d,g},
lub: d because dpg
Extremal Elements: Example 3
• Minimal/Maximal elements?
i j
• Minimal & Minimum element: a
• Maximal elements: b,d,i,j
f g h
• Bounds, glb, lub of {c,e}?

• Lower bounds: {a,c}, thus glb is c


e
• Upper bounds: {e,f,g,h,i,j}, thus lub
is e

c
b d • Bounds, glb, lub of {b,i}?
• Lower bounds: {a}, thus glb is c
a
• Upper bounds: , thus lub DNE
Lattices
• A special structure arises when every pair of elements in
a poset has an lub and a glb
• Definition: A lattice is a partially ordered set in which
every pair of elements has both
– a least upper bound and
– a greatest lower bound
Lattices: Example 1
• Is the example from before a i j
lattice?

f g h

• No, because the pair {b,c} e


does not have a least
upper bound
b c d

a
Lattices: Example 2

• What if we modified it as j
shown here?
i
f g h

• Yes, because for any pair, e


there is an lub & a glb

b c d

a
A Lattice Or Not a Lattice?
• To show that a partial order is not a lattice, it suffices to
find a pair that does not have an lub or a glb (i.e., a
counter-example)
• For a pair not to have an lub/glb, the elements of the pair
must first be incomparable (Why?)
• You can then view the upper/lower bounds on a pair as a
sub-Hasse diagram: If there is no maximum/minimum
element in this sub- diagram, then it is not a lattice
Complete lattices
• Definition:
A lattice A is called a complete lattice if every subset S of A
admits a glb and a lub in A.

• Exercise:
Show that for any (possibly infinite) set E, (P(E),) is a
complete lattice
(P(E) denotes the powerset of E, i.e. the set of all subsets of E).
Example

Y
c d e f

a b
L= {a,b,c,d,e,f,g}
 ={(a,c), (a,e), (b,d), (b,f), (c,g), (d,g), (e,g), (f,g)}T

(L,) is not a lattice:


a and b are lower bounds of Y, but a and b are not comparable
Exercise

• Prove that “Every finite lattice is a complete lattice”.


Example

{1,2,3}

lub(Y)

{1,2} {1, {2,3}


Y 3}

{1} { {3}
2
}

L= glb(Y) = Y
({1,2,3})

p =
lub(Y) = Y

glb(Y)
Example

- - - - 0 1 2 3 4
4 3 2 1


L= Z  {T,}
nZ : p npT
Example

L= Z+
6
p total order on Z+
5
lub = max
glb = min 4
3
2
is a lattice, but not complete:
It 1
For instance, the set of even numbers has no lub 0

37
Example

L= Z+  {T}
6
p total order on Z+  {T}
5
lub = max
glb = min 4
3
2
is a complete lattice
This 1
0
Examples

L=R (real numbers) with p =  (total


order) (R,  ) is not a complete lattice:
for instance {x  R | x > 2} has no lub
On the other hand,
for each x<y in R, ([x,y],  ) is a complete lattice

L=Q (rational numbers) with p =  (total


order) (Q,  ) is not a complete lattice
The set {x  Q | x2 < 2} has upper bounds but there is
no
least upper bound in Q.
• Theorem:
Let (L, p) be a partial order. The following conditions are
equivalent:
1. L is a complete lattice
2. Each subset of L has a least upper bound
3. Each subset of L has a greatest lower bound

• Proof:
– 1  2 e 1  3 by definition
– In order to prove that 2  1, let us define for
each Y  L glb(Y) = lub({l L |  l’  Y : l
 l’})
upper bounds of Z

glb(Y)= lub({l L |  l’  Y : l  {1,2,3}


l’})

Y
{1,2} {1, {2,3}
3}

lub(Z)
{ {2} {3}
1
}

{l L |  l’  Y : l  l’}
Z= 
Functions on partial orders
• Let (P,P) and (Q,Q) two partial orders. A function  from
P to Q is said:

• monotone (order
preserving) if p1 P p2
 p1 Q p2

• embedding if
p1 P p2  p1 Q p2

• Isomorphism if it is a surjective embedding


Examples

b d 1a  1 is not monotone


1d
a c 1b1
c

e
2d2e   is2 monotone, but it is not
d  b c
b c 2 2 an
2a embedding:2bQ2c
but it is not true that
a
bPc
Examples
e
d 3e  3 is monotone but it is
3c3 not an
b c embedding:3bQ3c
d
but it is not true that
3a3
a bPc
b

d 4d
4c
b c 
 4 is an embedding, but
not an isomorphism.
a 4b
4a
Isomorphism

j j’

i g h g’
i’

f
d e
e ’ d’
h’

f’
b b’
a’

c
c’
Monotone? Embedding? Isomorphism?

  from (Z, ) to (Z, ), defined by: (x)=x+1

1
  from((S), )
0 , defined by:
to
(U)=1 if U is nonempty, ()=0.

  from ((Z), ) to ((Z), ) , defined by:


(U)={1} if 1  U
(U)={2} if 2  U and 1 does not belong to U
(U)=  otherwise
Ascending chains

• A sequence (ln)nN of elements in a partial order


L is an ascending chain if
n  m  ln  lm

• A sequence (ln)nN converges if and only if

 n0N :  nN : n0  n  ln  ln
0

• A partial order (L,) satisfes the ascending chain


condition (ACC) iff each ascending chain
converges.
Example

• The set of even natural


12 numbers satisfies the
10 descending chain condition,
but not the ascending chain
8 condition
6
4
2
0
Example

• Infinite set
• Satisfies both ACC and
... DCC
Lattices and ACC
• If P is a lattice, it has a bottom element and satisfies ACC,
tyen it is a complete lattice

• If P is a lattice without infinite chains, then it is complete


Continuity
• In Calculus, a function is continuous if it preserves the limits.
• Given two partial orders (P,P) and (Q,Q), a functoin  from P to
Q
is continuous id for every chain S in P

lubS  lub{ (x) | xS }

(P,  (Q,Q
P) )
S
(S
)
Fixpoints

• Consider a monotone function f: (P,P)  (P,P) on a


partial order P.

• An element x of P is a fixpoint of f if f(x)=x.


• The set of fixpoints of f is a subset of P called Fix(f):

Fix(f) ={ l  P | f(l)=l}
Fixpoint on Complete Lattices

• Consider a monotone function f:LL on a complete lattice L.

• Fix(f) is also a complete lattice:

lfp(f) = glb(Fix(f))  Fix(f)


gfp(f) = lub(Fix(f))  Fix(f)

• Tarski Theorem:
Let L be a complete lattice. If f:LL is monotone then
lfp(f) = glb{ l  L | f(l)  l
} gfp(f) = lub{ l  L | l 
f(l) }
Fixpoints on Complete Lattices

{ l  L | f(l) P l}

gfp(f) = lub{ l  L | l 
Fix(f) ={ l  L |
f(l)=l} f(l) } lfp(f) = glb{ l  L |

f(l)  l }

{ l  L | l P f(l)}
Kleene Theorem
• Let f be a monotone function: (P,P)  (P,P) on a complete
lattice P. Let = n0 f n()

– If Fix(f) then = lfp(f)

– Kleene Theorem
If f is continuous then the least fixpoint of f esists , and it is
equal
to 

You might also like