SMS Texting
SMS Texting
Abstract
The University of Wolverhampton serves a region of suggest that SMS texting must also fit somewhere in
considerable social, economic and educational addressing UK higher education’s most pressing
diversity and disadvantage in the UK. The University problems, namely increased student participation and
is aware of the potential of mobile learning, teaching retention.
and administration in addressing the needs of its
students and it has national Centre of Excellence 2. The Technologies
(CETL) status for using innovative technologies in its
work. After several pilot projects with handheld In order to send SMS text from a computer,
computers and mobile phones (cell phones), it is now institutions and organisations can choose from
moving to a large-scale scheme that will use targeted various technologies. A very rough classification of
bulk SMS texting to enhance student support, the choices might be:
inclusion and retention. Bought-in standalone SMS texting systems
Component systems that integrate SMS
This paper examines the range of technologies and functionality into other applications
pedagogies that underlie the educational use of Existing systems that offer SMS texting as a
texting, the institutional issues that the proposed feature to enhance their core functionality.
large-scale texting scheme must address and the Any of these systems will enable a user to send an
interim results and progress of the scheme prior to its SMS text but the user will also need to have bought
launch at the start of the academic year 2005/2006. messages, preferably in bulk at a discount. It is the
role of ‘aggregators’ to act as intermediaries and
1. Introduction buffers between the networks and the customers
(since the customers cannot anticipate the exact mix
Most people including educators and their students of networks of their recipients).
are unaware of the facts that SMS text messages can
be bought in bulk at a considerable discount and can In order to exploit the full educational potential of
be written and sent from a conventional computer, for SMS texting it will be necessary in the future for
example a networked desktop PC or wireless-enabled higher education to involve the value-added service
laptop PC, using an interface no more complex than a (VAS) providers that work alongside the aggregators.
standard office email client. This opens up enormous These providers are responsible for the development
possibilities for using mobile phones, as cell phones of all the enhancements to basic SMS that are now
are known in the UK, to enhance, supplement and very apparent in the retail, media, business and
support student learning. There is a convincing leisure sectors such as voting by SMS, gaming by
educational argument that we outline below that SMS SMS, weather forecasts, news alerts, sports results
texting must fit somewhere, however small, within and share prices by SMS.
every institution’s blend of learning and an equally
convincing business case that sets the costs of bulk In practice of course, some providers offer all three
SMS text messages against student fee income and of the services outlined above.
Standalone systems are widely available, usually as a application that will contain a simple address book,
download. Once installed they appear as an perhaps imported directed from an
other personal information management application In anticipation of the initiative described in this
or via a file, often CSV, created specifically for this paper, a survey across large first-year modules in
purpose by the other application, otherwise created most Schools of the University of Wolverhampton
by hand, and containing a minimum of names and showed that undergraduates were positively disposed
phone numbers. The application will also minimally to SMS text to support their studies. The following
contain the functionality to create and send an SMS figure shows results from a typical module:
text. The vendors will obviously sell bulk messages
at a discount and may also charge a fee for using the Which would be useful ? Yes No
software – the situation varies from vendor to vendor. Help with Studying 51 8
Room Changes 38 21
In the case of UK further and higher education, a Appointment Reminders 49 8
variety of institutional software systems may offer Library Recalls 39 18
SMS functionality as an extra. These include Revision Tips 42 15
university or college library management systems, Assessment Reminders 52 6
students’ academic records databases and Assessment Marks 52 7
virtual/managed learning environments Timetable Changes 53 6
(VLEs/MLEs). In general it is fair to say that the Assessment Feedback 41 17
vendors and developers of many of these types of Ignores 1 – 3 unknowns per row
systems are grappling with the challenges presented
by mobile devices (both handheld computers and
This survey followed one of students involved in the
mobile phones) and by mobile learners.
earlier pilot in the School of Computing and IT at the
University that showed the participants in an SMS
There are many technologies that move the
pilot generally felt it had been a useful and helpful
educational use of mobile phones beyond the
experience.
possibilities of 2.5G, for example WAP and MMS.
The key feature of SMS and 2.5G technology is that Yes, No Did not
it is the most ubiquitous and hence most socially 46 Returns Maybe
Definitely Way Answer
inclusive of all the current phone technologies. This Are you pleased
has enormous ramifications in terms of any business you took part in 43 2 0 1
the experiment?
model, and in terms of staff and student acceptance.
Did the
experiment help 40 5 0 1
3. Student Reactions in your studies?
Would you
recommend the
One of the key issues in implementing any scheme of experiment to
38 7 0 1
large-scale will be student acceptance and other students?
engagement. There have been several surveys that
help to define the extent of student reaction and
hence the envelope of possibilities. Another question looked at the typology of SMS uses
An early survey took place at Kingston University Which messages are most useful ?
(Alsop et al, 2002 [1]) where feedback from students 46 Returns Most Fairly Useless Did Not
showed a wide acceptance of personalised, timely, Useful Useful Answer
Urgent admin,
non-‘spam’ SMS text and a preference for “push” such as room 29 13 1 3
technologies over “pull” technologies, that is SMS changes
and email over web-sites and notice boards, as a way General
of receiving information. A large and reminders, eg
25 19 0 2
coursework
complementary survey by the Learning and Skills
deadlines
Development Agency (Attewell & Savill-Smith, Teaching
2003 [2]) of 18-24-yr-olds showed a universal materials such 39 7 0 0
acceptance of SMS and a preference for mobiles as revision tips
phones and games over handheld computers. Individual 33 12 0 0
feedback on
coursework
Individual These examples are probably all, to a greater or lesser
admin such as 18 24 0 0
appointments extent, a mixture of learning and teaching
methodologies, difficult to extricate. We can however
examine SMS texting in order to assess its capacity to
All this survey work suggested that there was a role support a range of theoretical models. The most
for institutional SMS text within the University of obvious dichotomy is between transmissive and
Wolverhampton. discursive learning.