LectureNotes_10
LectureNotes_10
Lecture 10: 1-D maps, the Lorenz map, the logistic map,
sine map, period doubling bifurcation, tangent bifurca-
tion, transient and intermittent chaos in maps, orbit di-
agram (or the Feigenbaum diagram), the Feigenbaum con-
stants, universals of unimodal maps, universal route to
chaos
Contents
1 The Lorenz map 2
1.1 Cobweb diagram and map iterates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.2 Comparison of fixed point x∗ in 1-D continuous-time systems and 1-D discrete-time maps . 3
1.3 Period-p orbit and stability of period-p points . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Zz
it iii
it
z
Figure 1: (Left) Cobweb diagram of the Lorenz map. (Right) The Lorenz map iterates corresponding to
the cobweb diagram shown on the left.
I
In the previous lecture we showed, using the linearisation procedure, that the fixed point z ∗ (period-1
point) satisfying
I f (z ∗ ) = z ∗ , (3)
A IFF
where f (z) is the function defining the Lorenz map, is unstable. The general conditions for fixed point
stability were shown to be dependant on the absolute value of map function slope evaluated at given fixed
point z ∗ . For
|f 0 (z ∗ )| < 1, (4)
the fixed point is stable. For
|f 0 (z ∗ )| = 1, (5)
the fixed point is participating in a bifurcation. An example of this is shown below in Sec. 3.2. For
|f 0 (z ∗ )| > 1, (6)
the fixed point is unstable.
The following interactive numerical file shows the Lorenz map, its cobweb diagram and iterates. It can
be used to confirm the fact that the Lorenz map’s fixed point z ∗ is indeed unstable.
Numerics: nb#1
Cobweb diagram and iterates of the (generalised) Lorenz map. Lyapunov exponent λ(r) of the logistic
map.
1.0 1.0
0.5 0.5
zmax
zn+1
0.0 0.0
Zz
-0.5
it
-0.5
-1.0
-1.0 -0.5 0.0
zn
0.5
iii
1.0
it
-1.0
0 2 4
n
6
Figure 2: (Left) Cobweb diagram of the normalised Lorenz map showing the first ten iterates for z0 ≈ z ∗
8 10
I
A
I
IFF
Figure 3: (Top-left) Stable fixed point x∗ of a one-dimensional system given by ẋ = f (x) where f 0 (x∗ ) < 0 is
shown with the filled bullet. (Top-right) A family of time-series solutions shown for several initial conditions
positioned close to x∗ . The solutions correspond to the phase portrait shown on the left. (Bottom-left)
Unstable fixed point x∗ shown with the empty bullet where f 0 (x∗ ) > 0. (Bottom-right) A family of time-
series solutions shown for several initial conditions positioned close to x∗ . The solutions correspond to the
phase portrait shown on the left.
1.2 Comparison of fixed point x∗ in 1-D continuous-time systems and 1-D discrete-
time maps
The fixed points of one-dimensional continuous-time systems or in other words ordinary differential equa-
tions (ODEs) and of discrete-time one-dimensional maps are clearly analogous. Below we’ll start to distin-
guish fixed points of maps by their type. The type of the fixed point mentioned here will be referred to as
so called period-1 point. Figures 3 and 4 show that analogy and other similarities.
iti i
i
i
iti
T
j
ii
i t
i
Figure 4: (Top-left) Stable fixed point x∗ (a period-1 point) of a one-dimensional map given by xn+1 =
f (xn ) where |f 0 (x∗ )| < 1 is shown with the filled bullet. (Top-right) Three sets of map iterates xn where
i i
n ∈ [0, 3] shown for initial conditions x01 , x∗ and x02 corresponding to the cobweb diagram shown on the left.
∗ o 0 ∗
(Bottom-left) Unstable fixed point T x (a period-1 point) shown with the empty∗ bullet where |f (x )| > 1.
j iterates xn shown for initial conditions x01 , x and x02 corresponding to
t
(Bottom-right) Three sets of map
the cobweb diagram shown on thei left. t
i
i
i t i
1
PERIOD PERIOD
Figure 5: (Left) Period-4 orbit, shown with the blue graph, where zn+4 = zn . (Right) The Lorenz map
iterates zn where n ∈ [0, 8] corresponding to the cobweb diagram shown on the left. The map iterated
values repeat every four iterates.
So, can trajectories in a cobweb diagram of the Lorenz map close onto themselves? We could imagine a
trajectory of the Lorenz map’s cobweb plot closing onto itself in a manner shown in Fig. 5. Visual inspection
of the cobweb diagram shown in Fig. 5 reveals that the iterates zn (local maxima of the three-dimensional
Lorenz flow) repeat themselves such that z4 = z0 or more generally
if this dynamics can be shown to be possible, then it would strongly suggest that a limit-cycle might be
possible in the three-dimensional Lorenz attractor. This conclusion can be generalised further:
where p ∈ Z+ is the period of a limit-cycle. This type of fixed point is called the period-p point and
it represents the period-p orbit of the map. Period-p points are a new type of fixed points or in
other words a new type of dynamics. A period-1 point coincides with our old friend—fixed point z ∗ . The
period-p points where p > 1 don’t have corresponding analogies in one-dimensional continuous systems in
the manner as was discussed and shown in Sec. 1.2. This is because the period-p points represent oscil-
latory limit-cycle solutions which are not possible in one-dimensional systems, cf. Fig. 3 (see Lecture 2:
Impossibility of oscillations in 1-D systems).
It is natural to assume that period-p points or orbits, very much like fixed points z ∗ (a period-1 point),
can be either stable (attracting trajectories) or unstable (repelling trajectories). If we can show
that stable period-p orbits are possible in the Lorenz map, then that would strongly suggest a possibility
of periodic solutions in the continuous-time Lorenz attractor.
Let’s find the analytical expression for the relationship between zn+p and zn in (8). The n-th iterate of a
selected initial condition z0
zn = f (f (f (. . . f (z0 ) . . .))) ≡ f n (z0 ), (9)
| {z }
n times
where fn is the n-th iterate map—the map applied to itself n times. Don’t confuse this notation with
raising the map function to the n-th power. The subsequent iterates of the closed period-p orbits, similar
to the one shown in Fig. 5 with the blue trajectory, expressed analytically are
z1 = f (z0 ) ≡ f 1 (z0 )
z2 = f (z1 ) = f (f (z0 )) ≡ f 2 (z0 )
z3 = f (z2 ) = f (f (f (z0 ))) ≡ f 3 (z0 )
(10)
z4 = f (z3 ) = f (f (f (f (z0 ))) ≡ f 4 (z0 )
..
.
zn+p = f p (zn ),
where z is the period-p point in the period-p orbit and f p is the p-th iterate map.
Definition: z is a period-p point if equation
f p (z) = z, (11)
We find
chain rule +
d orbit points
|(f 2 (z))0 | = |f (f (z))| = 0
zn+2 = zn , = |f (f| (z
0 0 0
0 )) · f (z0 )| = |f (z1 )| · |f (z0 )| > 1, (14)
dz {z }
z1
and we select z0
because for the Lorenz map |f 0 (z)| > 1, ∀z in the map basin. The period-2 point is thus unstable. The
evolution of perturbations defined by (13) generalised to all period-p points in any closed period-p orbit are
the following:
p−1
Y
ηn+p ≈ f 0 (zn+k ) ηn , (15)
k=0
here, again, by the Lorenz map property:
p−1
Y
f 0 (zn+k ) > 1. (16)
k=0
Thus, all period-p points are unstable. The above analysis of the Lorenz map has strongly demonstrated
(not proven) that periodic solutions of the Lorenz system are not possible and that the flow is indeed long-
term aperiodic.
Following common usage, we’ll call both of them maps. If you’re disturbed by this, you must be a pure
mathematician... or should consider becoming one! Fixed point x∗ of one-dimensional map (17) satisfies
Eq. (3) and period-p point x satisfies Eq. (11) for minimal p.
Maps arise in various ways:
1. As tools for analysing differential equations. We have already encountered maps in this role. For
instance, the Lorenz map provided evidence that the Lorenz attractor is aperiodic, and is not just a
long-period limit-cycle. In future lectures the Poincaré maps will allowed us to prove the existence
of a periodic solutions, and to analyse the stability of periodic solutions in general. Maps will prove
to be superb tools for studying and analysing chaotic systems.
2. As models of natural phenomena. In some scientific contexts it is natural to regard time as
discrete. This is the case in digital electronics, in parts of economics and finance theory, in impulsively
driven mechanical systems, and in the study of certain animal populations where successive generations
do not overlap, i.e., where a generation lives only for one season.
3. As simple examples of chaos. Maps are interesting to study in their own right, as mathematical
laboratories for chaos. Indeed, maps are capable of much wilder behaviour than differential equations
because iterates xn hop along their orbits or trajectories rather than flow continuously. Continuity
is very much a restriction on possible dynamics, cf. Lecture 6: The Poincaré-Bendixson theorem.
Xh4 xhn xu
naif.gg xn
O 12
Figure 6: The logistic map shown with the red curve and the diagonal where xn+1 = xn .
Slide: 3
i
The logistic map
iii
1
The logistic map has the following form:
n ∈ Z+ , (1)
l
no
TRANSIENT PERIOD
l l l l
4
l l
PERIOD
l
3 / 19
l l
in
41
N htt 42 h13 14
n
Reading suggestion
Link File name Citation
Paper#1 paper2.pdf Robert M. May, “Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynam-
ics,” Nature, 261, pp. 459–467, (1976).
doi:10.1038/261459a0
Slides: 4–6
The Lyapunov exponent of the logistic map The Lyapunov exponent of the logistic map
Chaos is characterised by sensitive dependence on initial For small values of η0 , the quantity inside the absolute value signs is
conditions. If we take two close-by initial conditions, say x0 and just the derivative of f n with respect to x evaluated at x = x0 :
y0 = x0 + η with η 1, and iterate them under the map, then the 1 df n
difference between the two time series ηn = yn − xn should grow λ = ln . (5)
n dx x=x0
exponentially
|ηn | ∼ |η0 eλn |, (2) Since, f n (x) = f (f (f (. . . f (x))) . . .), by the chain rule:
where λ is the Lyapunov exponent. For maps, this definition leads to df n
= f 0 (f n−1 (x0 )) · f 0 (f n−2 (x0 )) · . . . · f 0 (x0 )
a very simple way of measuring the Lyapunov exponents. Solving (2) dx x=x0
for λ yields: n−1
Y (6)
1 ηn = |f 0 (xn−1 ) · f 0 (xn−2 ) · . . . · f 0 (x0 )| = f 0 (xi ) .
λ = ln . (3)
n η0 i=0
n n
By definition ηn = f (x0 + η0 ) − f (x0 ). Thus Our expression for the Lyapunov exponent takes the form:
n−1
Y n−1
1 f n (x0 + η0 ) − f n (x0 ) 1 1X
λ= ln . (4) λ= ln f 0 (xi ) = ln |f 0 (xi )|. (7)
n η0 n i=0
n i=0
2
See Mathematica .nb file uploaded to the course webpage.
D. Kartofelev YFX1560 6 / 19
The obtained algorithm is used in the following numerical file to calculate the Lyapunov exponent of the
logistic map as a function of the growth rate r.
Numerics: nb#1
Cobweb diagram and iterates of the (generalised) Lorenz map. Lyapunov exponent λ(r) of the logistic
map.
-1
λ
-2
-3
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
r
Figure 7: The Lyapunov exponent of the logistic map as a function of the growth rate r. Calculation
uses 5000 iterations for every r value plotted.
naif.gg
|r − 2r + 2| < 1, (30)
|2 − r| < 1, (31)
−xn
1 < 2 − r < 1 | − 2, (32)
O 12 − 3 < −r < −1 | · (−1), (33)
1 < r < 3. (34)
The fixed points x∗ = 1 − 1/r exist and is stable for 1 < r < 3.
iii i
i
Figure 8: (Left) Map slope at the fixed points x∗ = 1 − 1/r (same as the trivial cases x∗ = 0 = 1) for r = 1.
(Right) Map slope at the fixed points x∗ = 1 − 1/r for r = 3.
It seems that the found intervals (26), (28) and (34) excluded r = 1 (obviously it does not satisfy |f 0 (x∗ )| <
1). Let’s find the value of the map slope |f 0 (x∗ )| for r = 1 using (24) in the case of the trivial solutions
x∗ = 0 i
in
|f 0 (x∗ )| = |1 − 0| = 1, (35)
x∗ = 1 no
INITIAL |f 0 (x∗ )| = |1 − 2| = 1, (36)
TRANSIENT PERIOD 4 l PERIOD l
41
l l
and in the non-trivial case forI x∗l= 1l − l1/rl = 1l − l1 =n 0. Which should obviously generate the same result
13 14
N htt 42 h
1
|f 0 (x∗ )| = 1 − 2 1 − = |1 − 0| = 1. (37)
1
Below, it will also be beneficial to know what happens for r = 3, the r value just after the interval (34).
We consider the non-trivial fixed point x∗ = 1 − 1/r and find the slope
0 ∗ 1
|f (x )| = 3 − 2 · 3 1 − = |3 − 4| = | − 1| = 1. (38)
3
Usually, slope |f 0 (x∗ )| = 1 corresponds to the period doubling or flip bifurcation point (dynamics
explained below). Values r = 1 and r = 3 are the bifurcation points. Figure 8 shows the map and map
slopes |f 0 (x∗ )| evaluated at the non-trivial fixed point x∗ = 1 − 1/r for r = 1 and r = 3. The following
interactive numerical file show the dynamics of the logistic map for 0 ≤ r < 1 and 1 < r < 3.
Numerics: nb#2
Cobweb diagram of the logistic map. Orbit diagram of the logistic map. Period doubling bifurcation.
1.0 1.0
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
xn+1
xn
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0 5 10 15 20
xn n
1.0 1.0
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
xn+1
xn
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0 5 10 15 20
xn n
Figure 9: (Top-left) Cobweb diagram of the logistic map shown for r = 0.98 < 1. The fixed point
x∗ = 0. (Top-right) Map iterates corresponding to the cobweb diagram shown on the left. (Bottom-
left) Cobweb diagram of the logistic map shown for interval 1 < r < 3 with r = 2.82. The fixed point
x∗ = 1 − 1/r. (Bottom-right) Map iterates corresponding to the cobweb diagram shown on the left.
What happens for r ≥ 3? What happens after the period doubling or flip bifurcation at r = 3? The
name “flip” refers to the fact that the map trajectories start to flip between two values—the period-2 points
in a period-2 orbit. Let’s see this dynamics play out using a computer.
Numerics: nb#2
Cobweb diagram of the logistic map. Orbit diagram of the logistic map. Period doubling bifurcation.
After the initial transient behaviour has decayed the dynamics of the √ map settles to a stable
period-2 orbit. It can be showed that period-2 orbits exist for 3 ≤ r < 1 + 6.
1.0 1.0
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
xn+1
xn
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
xn n
Figure 10: (Left) Cobweb diagram of the logistic map shown for r = 3.19 ≥ 3 featuring the stable
period-2 point. (Right) Map iterates corresponding to the cobweb diagram shown on the left.
Let’s try to think about and unpack this outcome some more...
Slides: 7–9
The logistic map, period-2 window The logistic map, period-2 window
√
Period-2 window for 3 ≤ r < 1 + 6. √
Period-2 window for 3 ≤ r < 1 + 6.
(
f (p) = rp(1 − p) = q,
(10)
f (q) = rq(1 − q) = p,
here period-2 point values p and q are the f.p.s of f (x) map.
If you want to study the dynamics of the attractors of second iterate map analytically consider one f2
of the equations in (11, slide numbering). The fourth order polynomial defined by Eq. (11)
In our case:
)
(f 2 (p))0 = f 0 (f (p)) · f 0 (p) = f 0 (q) · f 0 (p)
⇒ (f 2 (p))0 = (f 2 (q))0 .
(f 2 (q))0 = f 0 (f (q)) · f 0 (q) = f 0 (p) · f 0 (q)
(14)
Above follows from the commutative property of multiplication.
D. Kartofelev YFX1560 9 / 19
The slopes of map f 2 at its fixed points p and q are equal and they are the products of map f slopes
at its respective period-2 points.
√
What happens for r ≥ 1 + 6? Once again we use a computer...
Numerics: nb#2
Cobweb diagram of the logistic map. Orbit diagram of the logistic map. Period doubling bifurcation.
√
A period-4 orbit has emerged. It can be shown that period-4 orbits exist for 1 + 6 ≤ r < 3.54409...
0.8
naif.gg xn
1.0
0.8
0.6 O 12 0.6
xn+1
xn
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
iii i
xn n
√
Figure 11: (Left) Cobweb diagram of the logistici map shown for r = 3.535 ≥ 1 + 6 featuring the stable
period-4 point. The blue graph shows the fourth iterate map f 4 . (Right) Map iterates corresponding
to the cobweb diagram of map f shown on the left.
Figure 12 counts the period-4 points or iterate values in the period-4 orbit of the logistic map. Compare
Fig. 12 to Figs 5 and 11.
I
INITIAL
TRANSIENT PERIOD
l l l l l
no
4
l l
PERIOD
l l l
in
41
N htt 42 h13 14
n
Figure 12: Period-4 orbit with its repeated iterates as they should appear in the logistic map.
What have we seen so far? As we have incrementally increased the value of control parameter r the
periods of the fixed points have increased as well—(from period-1) to period-2 and finally to period-4. The
period is clearly doubling starting from period-2. This type of bifurcation is called the period doubling
bifurcation. Now the name “period doubling” introduced above alongside “flip” bifurcation should make
more sense. Further period-doublings to orbits of period-8, -16, -32, -64, etc., also occur as r is increased.
Slide: 10
Specifically, let rn denote the value of r where a stable 2n -orbit first appears. Then computer experi-
ments reveal that:
r1 = 3.0 √ period-2
r2 = 1 + 6 ≈ 3.44949 period-4
r3 ≈ 3.54409 period-8
r4 ≈ 3.56441 period-16
r5 ≈ 3.56875 period-32
r6 ≈ 3.56969 period-64
.. ..
. .
r∞ ≈ 3.569946 period-2∞
r∞ – onset of chaos (the accumulation point).
rn−1 − rn−2
δ = lim ≈ 4.669201609... (15)
n→∞ rn − rn−1
D. Kartofelev YFX1560 10 / 19
Note that the successive bifurcations come faster and faster. Ultimately, the rn converge to
a limiting value r∞ . The convergence is (essentially) geometric (it’s geometric near r∞ ): in the limit
of large n, the distance between successive transitions shrinks by a constant factor of δ. This ratio is
called the Feigenbaum constant. After the accumulation point r > r∞ the dynamics becomes
chaotic as we’ll see below.
Numerics: nb#2
Cobweb diagram of the logistic map. Orbit diagram of the logistic map. Period doubling bifurcation.
The connection between the cobweb diagram, orbit diagram and the Lyapunov exponent is shown in the
following interactive numerical file.
Numerics: nb#3
The logistic map: cobweb diagram, orbit diagram and map iterates, the Lyapunov exponent.
Slides: 11, 12
Orbit diagram and period doubling Zooming into the logistic map, self-similarity
The period doubling is driven by the subsequent flip bifurcations or supercritical pitchfork
bifurcations (if we use the nomenclature introduced in Lecture 2). As mentioned above, unstable
fixed point and period-p points are omitted from the orbit diagram. The Feigenbaum diagram
shows both stable and unstable fixed points and period-p points or simply diagram branches (not shown
here).
The orbit diagram of the logistic map features self-similarity. In mathematics, a self-similar object
is (exactly or) approximately similar to a part of itself, i.e., the whole has the same shape or quality
as one or more of its sub-parts.
Slide: 13
Orbit diagram, period-3 window
D. Kartofelev YFX1560 13 / 19
√
The period-3 window that occurs for 1 + 8 ≤ r ≤ 3.8415... is the most conspicuous. On the above
slide it is shown within the red rectangle. Suddenly, against a backdrop of chaos, a stable period-3
orbit appears out of the blue.
Let’s see if we can find the period-3 orbit and window of the logistic map using a computer.
Numerics: nb#2
Cobweb diagram of the logistic map. Orbit diagram of the logistic map. Period doubling bifurcation.
√
The tangent bifurcation is a new type of bifurcation for us, that occurs at r = 1 + 8.
1.0 1.0
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
xn+1
xn
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
xn n
Figure 13: (Left) Period-3 orbit of the logistic map can be found in the period-3 window of the orbit
diagram, see Slide 11. Here, showing the trajectory for r = 3.83 and x0 & 0. (Right) Map iterates xn
corresponding to the cobweb diagram of the logistic map shown on the left.
The mechanism responsible for the occurrence of the odd number periods-p points is shown in Fig. 14.
The intersections between the graph of f 3, shown √ in red, and the diagonal correspond to solutions of
3
f (x) = x. There are eight solutions for r ≥ 1 + 8, six of interest to us are marked with the smaller blue
dots, and two imposters that are not genuine period-3; they are actually fixed points, or period-1 points for
which f (x∗ ) = x∗. The blue filled dots in Fig. 14 correspond to a stable period-3 cycle; note that the slope
of f 3 (x) is shallow at these points, consistent with the stability of the cycle. In contrast, the slope exceeds
one at the cycle marked by the empty blue dots; this period-3 orbit is therefore unstable.
h
xnn
yf.iyjo.IT
ipl xwo
king
Hagi
Xu
Figure 14: A period-3 orbit can be found in the period-3 window of the orbit diagram. The hollow bullets
correspond to the unstable period-p points, the filled bullets to the stable ones. The dashed and continuous
curves shown within the grey rectangular outline is a smaller distorted copy of map f in its entirety.
√
Now suppose we decrease r toward the chaotic regime r < 1 + 8. Then the red dashed graph in Fig. 14
changes shape—the hill moves down and the √ valleys rise up. The curve therefore moves towards the
diagonal. Figure 14 shows that when r = 1 + 8, the six blue intersections have merged to form three black
filled period-3 points by becoming tangent to the diagonal. At this critical value of r, the stable and
unstable period-3 cycles coalesce and annihilate in the tangent bifurcation. This transition defines the
beginning of the period-3 window discussed above.
All odd number periods will also undergo the period doubling. This means that all number periods [1, ∞)
are eventually represented in the orbit diagram.
Figure 14 also explains the self-similarity present in the orbit diagram as shown on Slide 12 for dif-
ferent scales of magnification. The peaks (shown within the grey rectangle) and valleys of map f 3 are
smaller distorted copies of the original map f . Thus, the local dynamics of the cobweb trajectories for map
f 3 must be similar to the dynamics of the original map f .
Slide: 14
3
Intermittency and period-3 window
Transient chaos and intermittency
√ in dynamical systems. Tangent
bifurcation occurs at r = 1 + 8 ≈ 3.8284 (onset of period-3 orbit).
xn
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
n
50 100 150
The dynamics closely related to the tangent bifurcation is intermittency. The logistic map exhibits
intermittent chaos for r values just before the period-3 window, i.e., just before the onset of the
period-3 orbit.
The following numerical file was used to calculate and create the graph shown on the above slide.
Numerics: nb#4
Period-3 window and intermittency in the logistic map.
Slide: 15
Universality of period doubling in unimodal maps
The graph of the sine map has the same basic shape as the graph of the logistic map. Both curves
are smooth, concave down, and have a single maximum. Such maps are called unimodal.
Sine is also a transcendental function opposed to an algebraic function as is the polynomial that
defines the logistic map. A transcendental function is an analytic function that does not satisfy a
polynomial equation. In other words, a transcendental function “transcends” algebra in that it cannot
be expressed in terms of a finite sequence of the algebraic operations of addition, multiplication, and
root extraction.
The transcendental nature of the sine map must make the underlying higher-dimensional physics
represented by the sine map fundamentally different from, e.g., the three-dimensional Lorenz flow
sampled by the Lorenz map.
Numerics: nb#5
The sine map iterates, cobweb and orbit diagrams where xn ∈ [0, 1].
In the following numerical file the basin of attraction is widened to span [−1, 1]. In effect, here two
unimodal maps are placed side-by-side. Sine map takes the following form:
Numerics: nb#6
The sine map iterates, cobweb and orbit diagrams where xn ∈ [−1, 1].
The dynamics of sine map is surprisingly similar to the dynamics of the logistic map. Mitchell
J. Feigenbaum was one of the first researchers1 to discover the quantitative laws that are independent
of unimodal map functions f . By that we mean that the algebraic form of f (x) is irrelevant, only its
overall shape matters, i.e., unimodality.
The following slide shows the scaling constants that are related to these universal laws that are present
in all the unimodal maps:
1
The first published works on period doubling and related phenomena were authored by a Finnish mathematician Pekka
Juhana Myrberg (1892–1976).
Slide: 16
dn−1
α = lim ≈ −2.502907875... (18)
n→∞ dn
D. Kartofelev YFX1560 16 / 19
Here xm = max f (x) is the maximum of the map graph. The Feigenbaum constants are valid up to
the onset of chaos at accumulation point r∞ and inside each periodic window for r > r∞ .
In addition to scaling law in control parameter r direction, shown earlier, Feigenbaum also found
a scaling law for the vertical x-direction of the orbit diagram. The Feigenbaum constants are
universal the same convergence rate appears no matter what unimodal map is iterated! They are
mathematical constants, as basic to period doubling as π is to circles.
Reading suggestion
Link File name Citation
Paper#2 paper3.pdf Mitchell J. Feigenbaum, “Quantitative universality for a class of nonlinear trans-
formations,” Journal of Statistical Physics, 19(1), pp. 25–52, (1978).
doi:10.1007/BF01020332
Paper#3 paper4.pdf Mitchell J. Feigenbaum, “Universal behavior in nonlinear systems,” Physica D:
Nonlinear Phenomena, 7(1–3), pp. 16–39, (1983).
doi:10.1016/0167-2789(83)90112-4
Revision questions
1. What is cobweb diagram?
2. What is recurrence map or recurrence relation?
3. What is 1-D map?
4. How to find fixed points of 1-D maps?
5. What is the Lorenz map?
6. What is the logistic map?
7. What is sine map?
8. What is period doubling?
9. What is period doubling bifurcation?
10. What is tangent bifurcation?
11. Do odd number periods (period-p orbits) exist in chaotic systems?
12. Do even number periods (period-p orbits) exist in chaotic systems?
13. Can maps produce transient chaos?
14. Can maps produce intermittency?
15. Can maps produce intermittent chaos?
16. What is orbit diagram (or the Feigenbaum diagram)?
17. What are the Feigenbaum constants?