Scribd
Upload
39 views2 pages

0th Review Evaluation

The document outlines the submission process for project proposals for the academic year 2024-25, including details on team members, project titles, and evaluation criteria. It specifies the requirements for the 0th review presentation and the rating scale for assessing various aspects of the project proposals. Additionally, it provides guidelines on the acceptance status based on evaluation scores and necessary modifications if required.

Uploaded by

takerhelp
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
39 views2 pages

0th Review Evaluation

The document outlines the submission process for project proposals for the academic year 2024-25, including details on team members, project titles, and evaluation criteria. It specifies the requirements for the 0th review presentation and the rating scale for assessing various aspects of the project proposals. Additionally, it provides guidelines on the acceptance status based on evaluation scores and necessary modifications if required.

Uploaded by

takerhelp
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

ACADEMIC YEAR – 2024-25

PROJECT PROPOSAL SUBMISSION – 0th REVIEW

Date :

Class / Semester / Section : IV – I B. Tech


Project Batch Number :
Name of the Project Guide :
Project Team :
Member 1/ Leader Member 2 Member 3 Member 4
Reg. 21K61A1243 21K61A1220 21K61A1228 21K61A1202
No
Name PENUMUDI SATYA I V N SATISH M RAMYA SRI B LEELA SAI
RAM KUMAR KRISHNA
Sign

Base paper details :


Project Proposal 1 Project Proposal 2 Project Proposal 3
Category of the APPLICATION / RESEARCH / PRODUCT APPLICATION / RESEARCH / PRODUCT APPLICATION / RESEARCH / PRODUCT
Proposal BASED / REVIEW (Tick) BASED / REVIEW (Tick) BASED / REVIEW (Tick)

Development IMPLEMENTATION / SIMULATION / IMPLEMENTATION / SIMULATION / IMPLEMENTATION / SIMULATION /


Method PRODUCT DESIGN / ANALYSIS (Tick) PRODUCT DESIGN / ANALYSIS (Tick) PRODUCT DESIGN / ANALYSIS (Tick)

MACHINE LEARNING DEEP LEARNING MOBILE DEVELOPMENT


Problem Domain

Sub Domain LSTM


FAKE URL PREDICTION SENTIMENT ANALYSIS DIGITAL NOTICE BOARD
Proposed Title USING LSTM WITH STUDENTS
DISCUSSION FORM

Base Paper Title

Journal Name

Publisher Name

Publication Year

Impact Factor

Note:
Base paper title and proposed title should not be same but relevant to the proposed work

0th Review slide should contain the following information for each Project Idea / Title

Title Slide, Problem statement & Objective, Existing System, Future Enhancements / Disadvantages of Existing
System, Proposed System, Applications of the Proposed System ----------------------------- 6 to 8 slides

Here by I am recommending my project team to attend 0th review after careful verification of the slides
and other necessary documents prepared by them.

Signature of the Project Guide


PROJECT – 0th REVIEW EVALAUTION

Rate the following questions in 1 to 5 scales.

1. Is the publication year of the base paper from 2021 and 2022? If not, are you satisfied P1 P2
P3 with the justification given by the project teams? ------------------------------------------

2. Social impact of the project. ------------------------------------------

3. Quality of the Journal and Publisher of the base paper. ------------------------------------------

4. Clarity in the Problem definition. ------------------------------------------

5. Clarity in objective. ------------------------------------------

6. Analysis about existing system. ------------------------------------------

7. Definite explanation about proposed system. ------------------------------------------

8. Clear idea about the feasibility of the project. ------------------------------------------

9. Knowledge and Content Organization of slide used during presentation. -------------

10. Command & proficiency of the language used during presentation. -------------

Total

Changes Suggested by the DPRC Member

1.

2.

3.

4.

Final Project Proposal suggested by the DPRC Member

Accepted if marks > 40 Accepted with minor Modifications if marks > 30

Accepted with major Modifications if marks > 20 Rejected if marks < 20

Signature of the DPRC


Member
Note:

⮚ Accepted status is informed to proceed further with the title proposed.


⮚ Accepted with minor modifications status is asked to incorporate the changes suggested by the DPRC and the modified
documents (duly signed by the supervisor) should be submitted to the Project Coordinator.
⮚ Accepted with major modifications status is asked to incorporate the changes suggested by the evaluation team and
attend re-review in front of DPRC.
⮚ Rejected status is asked to attend re-review with another three set of ideas in front of DPRC.

You might also like