0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views23 pages

m7 MQAM ErrorAnalysis

The document discusses various M-ary modulation types, including MFSK, MPSK, and M-QAM, focusing on their design, error performance, and trade-offs in power and bandwidth efficiency. It highlights the importance of choosing the right modulation scheme based on factors like power efficiency and bandwidth efficiency, while also addressing the theoretical limits on performance and spectral efficiency. Additionally, it provides a summary comparison of M-ary modulation schemes, detailing their bit rates, bandwidth, average transmit power, and error probabilities.

Uploaded by

tamchiuho0125
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views23 pages

m7 MQAM ErrorAnalysis

The document discusses various M-ary modulation types, including MFSK, MPSK, and M-QAM, focusing on their design, error performance, and trade-offs in power and bandwidth efficiency. It highlights the importance of choosing the right modulation scheme based on factors like power efficiency and bandwidth efficiency, while also addressing the theoretical limits on performance and spectral efficiency. Additionally, it provides a summary comparison of M-ary modulation schemes, detailing their bit rates, bandwidth, average transmit power, and error probabilities.

Uploaded by

tamchiuho0125
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 23

Update/Outline

• Previously we have discussed


– Probability of Error for Orthogonal M-ary
modulation
– Union Bound
– Some signal types
• We will now consider
– M-ary Modulation Types
– MFSK, MPSK
– Tradeoffs

!1
M-ary Modulation Types
• We have seen how to:
– Design an optimum M-ary Receiver
– Calculating the probability of bit and
symbol errors
– Considered some general transmission
signal types
• Now we wish to discuss specific but
popular modulation formats and
determine their properties and when to
use which one

!2
M-ary Phase-Shift Keying (MPSK)

• Assuming that

!3
Examples of MPSK constellation

Also called QPSK

!4
MPSK signal sets for M=2,4,8,16

!5
Error Performance of MPSK
• It can be shown that

i.e. Eqn.(4-98) in Ziemer and Peterson


Except for M = 2 and 4, numerical integration is needed.
Alternatively, we can use the tight upper and lower bounds below.

!6
SER vs Eb/No for MPSK

!7
For large Es/No:

Very tight for fixed M as Es/N0 increases.

How about Bit error prob?


Different from M-ary orthogonal, it depends
on the bit labeling scheme used.

Typically Gray Coding is used for MPSK.


!8
Binary Code Gray Code

!9
Gray Coding
• Allows representation of symbols or bit-to-symbol
mapping
• In going from one symbol to an adjacent symbol,
only one bit out of the k (or n bits in text) bits
changes.
• An adjacent symbol error (i.e. the most likely
symbol error) will therefore be accompanied by one
and only one bit error.
• Thus, the bit error probability of Gray-coded
MPSK can be well approximated by

!10
M-QAM Modulation
Time Domain Description
sk (t) = ak cos( c t) + bk sin( c t) for t [0, Ts ], k = {1, 2, ..., M }

where ak , bk ⇤ {± , ±3 , ..., ±( M 1) } and M = {4, 16, 64, 256, ...}

Geometric Domain Description 2-dim signal space with basis


functions {cos( c t), sin( c t)}
Rectangular M-QAM
signals can be
2 generated easily
using I-Q modulator

!11
2
MQAM Performance
• Bit Rate: Rb = T1 log2 M
s

• Average Symbol Energy: Es = 2 + 2(3 ) + ...
2
M
2 2


– e.g. for 16QAM, Es = 2
4 2 + 2(3 ) = 10 2
2 2

• Average Transmit Power: Ps = Es


Ts

• Remarks:
– Not all M points have the same energy.
– Information can be visualized as carried by
the amplitude and phase information of the
points
!12
MQAM Performance
• Symbol Error Probability (SER)
Analysis:
– M-QAM can be regarded as two
independent M-PAM, each having M = 2 k/2
points

– Probability of correct decision for M-QAM


is given by:
Pc = (1 P M )2 where P M is the probability

of error of a M -PAM.

2
!13
M-QAM Performance
• It can be shown that
⇥ ⇤ ⇥
P⇥M = 2 1 ⇥1
M
Q 3 Es
M 1 N0

• Hence, ⇥ ⇥
PM = 1 (1 P⇥M )2 ⇥ 2P⇥M = 4 1 ⇥1
M
Q 3 Es
M 1 N0

• Recall that the MPSK



SER

is given by:
PM 2Q sin M 2Es
N0

• Compare M-QAM with M-PSK SER:


– The gain of M-QAM over M-PSK is given
by: gain = 2 3/(M 2
1)
sin ( /M)
!14
M-QAM Union Bound
• Instead of working out the exact Pe, the
union bound is simpler and is
asymptotically accurate for high SNR.
⇥ ⇥ ⇥
d2min (2 )
2
3Es
Pe ⇥ 4Q ⇤ 4Q ⇤ 4Q
2N0 2N0 (M 1)N0

On average 4 nearest neighbors


• Compare with the exact Pe, they are very
close especially for large Es/No.

!15
Choices of M-ary Modulations

• There are a number of factors that one needs to


consider in order to pick a modulation scheme.
For example:
– Power efficiency (inversely propotional to Eb/No)
– Bandwidth efficiency (bit rate/bandwidth)
• M-ary modulation allows us to trade in power,
bit rate and bandwidth

!16
Error Probability Performance Curves
• Allow us to design and set an operating point for a
system
• Consider MFSK
– Increasing M can provide an improvement in Pb,or
reduction in the Eb/N0 required, at the cost of increased
bandwidth
• Consider MPSK
– Increasing M can provide a reduction in bandwidth
requirement, at the cost of degraded Pb, or increase in
the Eb/N0 requirement

!17
Theoretical Limits on Performance
• Channel Capacity is the theoretical upper bound for the
maximum rate at which information could be transmitted
without error (Shannon 1948)
• For a bandlimited channel that is corrupted by AWGN
the maximum rate achievable is given by

!18
the ideal channel
Spectral Efficiency
Shannon Limit
• N=N0B, hence

• Next note that Energy Efficiency

• Then

!19
Bandwidth- efficiency plane

MPAM/MQAM

MPSK

Coherent
MFSK !20
Trade-Offs
• Power-Limited Systems: Power scarce but bandwidth
available
– Improved Pb by expanding bandwidth (for a
given Eb/N0 ) or required Eb/N0 can be reduced
by expanding bandwidth (for a given Pb)
• Bandwidth-Limited Systems: bandwidth scarce
– Maximize R over the bandlimited channel at the
expense of Eb/N0 (for a given Pb)

!21
Shannon Limit
• In the limit as R/B goes to 0, we get

This value is called the Shannon Limit ( what


is the relationship with k going to infinity)
Received Eb/N0 must be > −1.6dB for reliable
communications to be possible

!22
Summary of M-ary Modulation Schemes
M-FSK M-PSK M-QAM
Bit Rate 1 1 1
Rb = log2 (M ) Rb = log2 (M ) Rb = log2 (M )
Ts Ts Ts
BW (Bandpass) M 1 1
BW =
<latexit sha1_base64="63ex6CMatJbg99j4M8tf7vvI+Nc=">AAAB/XicdVDLSsNAFJ3UV62v+Ni5GWwFVyWplDYLodSNG6FCX9CGMJlO2qGTBzMToYbgr7hxoYhb/8Odf+OkraCiBy4czrmXe+9xI0aFNIwPLbeyura+kd8sbG3v7O7p+wddEcYckw4OWcj7LhKE0YB0JJWM9CNOkO8y0nOnl5nfuyVc0DBoy1lEbB+NA+pRjKSSHP2o1OzBCzj0OMLJdZq0HZGWHL1olK16tXpeh0bZMKyKVVPEsiyzZkJTKRmKYImWo78PRyGOfRJIzJAQA9OIpJ0gLilmJC0MY0EihKdoTAaKBsgnwk7m16fwVCkj6IVcVSDhXP0+kSBfiJnvqk4fyYn47WXiX94gll7dTmgQxZIEeLHIixmUIcyigCPKCZZspgjCnKpbIZ4gFYRUgRVUCF+fwv9Jt1I2Fb+pFBvNZRx5cAxOwBkwQQ00wBVogQ7A4A48gCfwrN1rj9qL9rpozWnLmUPwA9rbJ2LslI8=</latexit>
Ts
BW =
Ts
BW =
Ts
Average Transmit Es Es 4 2
log2 M/2
⇥ (2i 1)2
Power Ts Ts M Ts i=1

Average Symbol ⇤ ⇥ ⇤ ⇥
Es 2Es ⇥ ⇥
Error Probability Pe ⇥ (M 1)Q Pe 2Q sin( /M ) PM ⇥ 4 1 ⇥1 Q 3 Es
M 1 N0
N0 N0 M

(SER)
Remarks • Orthogonal Signaling • Equi-energy constellation • Points are NOT equi-energy
Schemes (Equi-energy points (information carried by phase
• Information is carried by
& Mutually orthogonal values only)
both amplitude and phase
signals)
• Dimension of the signal set • Enhance spectral efficiency
• Enhance Energy Efficiency is always 2 (I-Q modulator) at the expense of extra power
at the expense of extra BW
• Enhance spectral efficiency • Better than M-PSK for
at the expense of extra power
M>4.
!23

You might also like