Scribd
Upload
22 views5 pages

Notes

The document discusses the complexities of defining and classifying abnormal behavior and mental disorders, highlighting the challenges in establishing a 'gold standard' for mental health compared to physical health. It critiques the DSM-5 for its categorical approach and operational criteria while acknowledging its benefits in minimizing subjectivity and providing clear definitions. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of understanding mental illness as a result of internal dysfunction rather than social deviance, and the need for a dimensional approach to better capture the variability of human behavior.

Uploaded by

teyawnagrignon99
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
22 views5 pages

Notes

The document discusses the complexities of defining and classifying abnormal behavior and mental disorders, highlighting the challenges in establishing a 'gold standard' for mental health compared to physical health. It critiques the DSM-5 for its categorical approach and operational criteria while acknowledging its benefits in minimizing subjectivity and providing clear definitions. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of understanding mental illness as a result of internal dysfunction rather than social deviance, and the need for a dimensional approach to better capture the variability of human behavior.

Uploaded by

teyawnagrignon99
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

January 12, 2023

Overlapping domains in study of abnormal behavior


- Nature
o Pure description
o Ex. Difference between mood and personality disorder
- Causes
o Explanation
o Why does someone develop depression, anxiety, etc.
- Factors involved in eliminating or reducing psychopathology… or
treatment
o Relies heavily on explanation and cause
Nature of psychopathology… or description
- How do we delineate mental disorder
o Carve them up
- Defining
- Organizing
o Categorization and classification
Challenge for defining: what’s the “gold standard”
- For physical illness the norm is the structural ad functional
integrity of the body
- For mental disorders... what “norm” of human functioning should
we use?
o More complicated
o “normal” behavior and mental functions are highly variable
o Variability in human behavior is what makes humans unique
and wonderful
o Makes diagnosing abnormal behavior tricky
Elements of definition
- Mental illness entails internal dysfunction
o Some psychological process (mood, emotion, memory,
cognition, language) is unable to function appropriately
o Psychological process: some process that is supposed to be
working properly
- Must have either distress (mental pain) or disability (loss of
functioning)
o Severity criteria (to distinguish from normal experiences)
o What makes it clinically significant
- Ultimate cause (etiology) irrelevant
o Need not be internal or psychological
o May be psychological, biological, social
o Example: adjustment disorders tied to current life stress
o Can develop disorder de to chemical in environment
- Mental disorder is not social deviance
o Deviance is personally chosen violation of social norms
o Only mental disorder when due to internal dysfunction
“Nomenclature”
- Standardized system if terms used within a particular science or
discipline
- Good description, using standardized terms, permits classification
o E.g. impulse > impulse-control disorders
- Standardized classification adds clarity, efficiency, and consistency
to communication
- A classification for diseases if called a nosology
o In America for mental disorders: DSM
- Specialised language
- Cynical word: jargon
Pros of DSM-5
- Operational criteria are given
o For each disorder
o Clear definition that can be measured and observed
- Relatedly, subjectivity is minimized
o Someone that meets symptoms for GAD, will meet
symptoms at all psychologists
- Descriptive and atheoretical
o Doesn’t claim cause of disorders
o Disorders grouped by symptoms, not causes
Cons of DSM-5
- Can mislead us into:
o Forgetting that tis is only one way of classifying
psychopathology
o No alternative to classifying
o Overlooking it’s a work in progress, product of human minds
o Placement of disorders in categories shifts
o Consideration of a “disorder” changes
 New disorders emerge
 Ex. Disruptive mood regulation (kids)
 Old disorders no longer exist
 Homosexuality
o It is a categorical system
 Based off medical model
 Implies sharp division
 Between “normal” and abnormal”
o Example: high functioning psychopath,
would meet many psychopathic symptoms
except for getting in trouble by law
 Between disorders
o Example: body dysmorphia and OCD. Both
repetitive thoughts and behavior
Categorical diagnostic system
- Meet 5/9 criteria? Yes- diagnosis No
Dimension approach
- ID primary dimensions of human personality and psychological
functioning
o These apply to whole population
o Building block of human experience
o Extraversion
o Negative affectivity
o Impulsivity
o Perfectionism
o Neuroticism (emotional instability)
o Hostility
- Locate the individuals scores on the dimensions
o Only extremes, or some combinations, may be pathological
DSM-5 structure
- no longer multi-axial
o Previous DSM thought of disorders as either long term or
short-term
- Mental disorders
o Symptom syndrome (“state” disorders)
 “Short term”
o Personality dysfunction (“trait” disorders)
- Relevant medical conditions
o Some medical conditions have similar symptoms to mental
conditions
- Other conditions that can be focus of clinical attention
o E.g. psychosocial/environmental factors
- Optional: disability rating
o WHO disability assessment schedule
Caveats
- Dangers of looking at symptoms in isolation
o Overestimate amount of mental illness... “pathologizing”
 Ex. Medical student syndrome, applying everything to
ourselves
 Everyone has elements of disorders
o Overlook continuity with all human experience
o Overlook social causes and personal context

You might also like