Scribd
Upload
5 views

Assignment-11-Homework

The document presents two ANOVA analyses: one comparing GMAT scores across different undergraduate backgrounds and another assessing the value for the dollar among various cell phone types. The first analysis shows significant differences in GMAT scores, particularly with Sciences outperforming Liberal Arts and Business backgrounds. The second analysis indicates no significant differences in perceived value for the dollar across cell phone types.

Uploaded by

khanhtruong.31231027495
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
5 views

Assignment-11-Homework

The document presents two ANOVA analyses: one comparing GMAT scores across different undergraduate backgrounds and another assessing the value for the dollar among various cell phone types. The first analysis shows significant differences in GMAT scores, particularly with Sciences outperforming Liberal Arts and Business backgrounds. The second analysis indicates no significant differences in perceived value for the dollar across cell phone types.

Uploaded by

khanhtruong.31231027495
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

29

S1:
H0: There is no significant difference in the mean GMAT score of students from different undergraduate backgrounds who app
H1: There is at least 1 significant difference in the mean GMAT score of students from different undergraduate backgrounds w
S2: 3 undergraduate backgrounds => Use the ANOVA
S3: Desciptive Statistics
Descriptives
Scorces 95% Confidence
Interval for Mean
Std. Lower Upper
N Mean Deviation Std. Error Bound Bound Minimum Maximum
Business 13 584.08 11.601 3.217 577.07 591.09 565 605
Liberal Arts 7 572.00 7.461 2.820 565.10 578.90 562 584
Sciences 18 595.50 9.532 2.247 590.76 600.24 580 612
Total 38 587.26 13.231 2.146 582.91 591.61 562 612

There are 7 respondents who have Liberal Arts background, have the average scorces is 572.00 and std=7.461
The highest scorces belongs to the group of people who have Sciences background, with the mean is 595.50 and std=9.532

S4: Homogeneity of Varience test


Test of Homogeneity of Variances
Levene
Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
Scorces Based on 1.183 2 35 0.318
Mean
Based on 0.995 2 35 0.380
Median
Based on 0.995 2 33.091 0.381
Median
and with
adjusted df
Based on 1.179 2 35 0.320
trimmed
mean
Flevene's test = 1.183, plevene's test>0.05
* Equal variences assumed
* ANOVA table could be use
* Don't need to use Robust test for Equality of Mean (Welch test/Brown Forsythe)

S5: Hypothesis test


ANOVA
Scorces
Sum of Mean
Squares df Square F Sig.
Between 2983.945 2 1491.973 14.948 0.000
Groups
Within 3493.423 35 99.812
Groups
Total 6477.368 37

FANOVA's test = 14.948, p<0.001


There is at least 1 significant difference in the mean GMAT score of students from different undergraduate backgrounds who a
S6: Post-hoc test
Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable:
LSD 95% Confidence
Mean Interval
(I) Undergraduate Difference Lower Upper
Major (I-J) Std. Error Sig. Bound Bound
Business Liberal Arts 12.077* 4.684 0.014 2.57 21.59
Sciences -11.423* 3.636 0.003 -18.81 -4.04
Liberal Arts Business -12.077 *
4.684 0.014 -21.59 -2.57
Sciences -23.500* 4.450 0.000 -32.53 -14.47
Sciences Business 11.423* 3.636 0.003 4.04 18.81
Liberal Arts 23.500* 4.450 0.000 14.47 32.53
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.

The mean GMAT score of students who are from Business background is 12.077 bigger than the mean GMAT score of student
The mean GMAT score of students who are from Liberal Arts background is 23.500 smaller than the mean GMAT score of stud
The mean GMAT score of students who are from Sciences background is 11.423 bigger than the mean GMAT score of student

30
S1:
H0: There is no significant difference in the mean response for Value for the Dollar from different types of cell phones.
H1: There is at least 1 significant difference in the mean response for Value for the Dollar from different types of cell phones.
S2: 3 types of cell phones => Use the ANOVA
S3: Descriptive Statistics
Descriptives
Value for the Dollar 95% Confidence
Interval for Mean
Std. Lower Upper
N Mean Deviation Std. Error Bound Bound Minimum Maximum
Smart 21 3.81 1.030 0.225 3.34 4.28 2 5
Camera 19 3.16 0.958 0.220 2.70 3.62 1 5
Basic 12 3.17 0.577 0.167 2.80 3.53 2 4
Total 52 3.42 0.957 0.133 3.16 3.69 1 5

There are 12 respondents who use Basic cell phones, have the average Value for the Dollar is 3.17$ and std=0.577$
The highest average Value for the Dollar belongs to the group of respondents who use Smart cell phones, with the mean is 3.8

S4: Homogeneity of Varience test


Test of Homogeneity of Variances
Levene
Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
Value for Based on 3.171 2 49 0.051
the Dollar Mean
Based on 2.965 2 49 0.061
Median
Value for
the Dollar

Based on 2.965 2 46.596 0.061


Median
and with
adjusted df
Based on 2.986 2 49 0.060
trimmed
mean

Flevene's test = 3.171, plevene's>0.05


* Equal variences assumed
* ANOVA table could be use
* Don't need to use Robust test for Equality of Mean (Welch test/Brown Forsythe)

S5: Hypothesis test


ANOVA
Value for the Dollar
Sum of Mean
Squares df Square F Sig.
Between 5.261 2 2.631 3.111 0.053
Groups
Within 41.431 49 0.846
Groups
Total 46.692 51

FANOVA's test = 3.111, p>0.05


Because p>0.05 so there is no significant difference in the mean response for Value for the Dollar from different types of cell p
raduate backgrounds who apply to the MBA program.
undergraduate backgrounds who apply to the MBA program.

and std=7.461
an is 595.50 and std=9.532

ergraduate backgrounds who apply to the MBA program.


mean GMAT score of students who are from Liberal Arts background, the difference is significant at 0.05 level.
the mean GMAT score of students who are from Sciences background, the difference is significant at 0.001 level.
mean GMAT score of students who are from Business background, the difference is significant at 0.001 level.

t types of cell phones.


ifferent types of cell phones.

17$ and std=0.577$


l phones, with the mean is 3.81$ and std=1.030$
r from different types of cell phones.

You might also like