Scribd
Upload
20 views7 pages

Stats

The document presents results from multiple hypothesis tests comparing means and proportions across different scenarios. In some cases, null hypotheses were rejected indicating significant differences, while in others, they were not rejected suggesting no significant differences. The tests utilized various significance levels and statistical methods including t-tests, chi-square tests, and z-tests.

Uploaded by

kean.servida
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
20 views7 pages

Stats

The document presents results from multiple hypothesis tests comparing means and proportions across different scenarios. In some cases, null hypotheses were rejected indicating significant differences, while in others, they were not rejected suggesting no significant differences. The tests utilized various significance levels and statistical methods including t-tests, chi-square tests, and z-tests.

Uploaded by

kean.servida
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

1.

a. H0: μ1 = μ2
H1: μ1 ≠ μ2 (two-tailed)

b. α = .05

c. T stats
t = -2.106625221173716 and t = 2.106625221173716

d. T critical value/p-value
t critical = -2.045 and t critical = 2.045
p = 0.04391892935399045

e. Since the Test statistic falls into the rejection region, this only means that H0 is rejected.
This means that the mean score of the applicants on the entrance examination this year
is significantly different from last year’s mean score.

2.
a. H0: μ1 = μ2
H1: μ1 < μ2

b. α = .05
c. T stats
t = -2.2661759398307244
d. T critical value/p-value
t critical = -4.197
p = 0.01318233263761238
e. Since the test statistic does not fall to the rejection region, we fail to protect the
left tailed hypothesis. Meaning that there is no significant difference between the
5-week course and 6-week course.

3.
a. H0: μ1 = μ2
H1: μ1 ≠ μ2
b. α = .01
c. T stats
t=0
d. T critical value/p-value
t critical = 4.751
p = 1.0000000214575295
e. Since the test statistic does not fall to the rejection region, we fail to protect the two tailed
hypothesis. Meaning that there is no significant difference between the two.

4.
a. H0: μ1 = μ2
H1: μ1 ≠ μ2
b. α = 0.01
c. T stats
t = -2.1544298128421646 and t = 2.1544298128421646
d. T critical value/p-value
t critical = - 6.150 and t critical = 6.150
p= 0.034752331788079724
e. Since the test statistic does not fall to the rejection region, we fail to protect the two tailed
tailed hypothesis. Meaning that there is no significant difference between the study
conducted in two schools using comparable samples and equally qualified, competent
teachers.

5.
a. H0: p1 = p2
H1: p1 ≠ p2
b. The level of significance is .01
c. Test statistic
Z = 1.3535421418297169
d. Critical value and P value
P= 0.0056430770740839575
e. Since the P value is less than 0.01 there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the
proportion between the approved respondents on the president’s leadership is not
correlational to one another.

6.
a. Ho: σ2 = 100
H1: σ2 > 100
b. Significance level
.01
c. X2 = 19.9959 and 65.4756
d. Chi-square critical = 51.5775
e. Since the test statistic is greater than and less than to both the critical value respectively,
we can conclude that there’s not much different when it comes to the result of the SAT in
previous years compared to the present.

7.
a. H0: μD = d0
H1: μD < d0 (left tailed)
b. The level of significance is .05 or the confidence level is 0.95 (95%)
c. Compute the test statistic.
t= -3.253956867279843
d. t critical = N/A
p = 0.004967142745924352
e. Since the P value is less than .05, we can conclude that the null hypothesis is
rejected, meaning that the post test mean score is higher than the pre test mean
score.

You might also like