Module 5 Sample Design Problem With Solution
Module 5 Sample Design Problem With Solution
1. Considering only the column, and only as a short column, find the largest magnitude of 𝑷𝒖 that can be safely applied onto the
frame, as shown in the figure.
2. Assume that 40% of the applied load is dead load. Place three (3) harped strands in the beam with zero eccentricity at the free
end, and at the zero-tension envelope at the column face. Then, based only on the ultimate flexural strength design, determine
whether the beam is adequate for carrying the applied loads of Part 1? Do not use any mild steel, and do not need to check stresses
either at the transfer or at the service conditions.
3. Using the detailed shear design method, determine the amount (if any) of the shear reinforcement necessary for the beam at its
critical section. (Will be discuss on Final Term)
4. Check maximum crack width for the beam and determine if it is acceptable for humid areas. (Will be discuss on Final Term)
5. Using only the non-sway magnification factor for a single cantilever column, determine the maximum lever arm for the 𝟎. 𝟏𝑷𝒖 load,
so that the column not fail due to its slenderness.
Prepared by: Engr. Andro S. Rebuyas, RCE, ME-1, SO2, RMP, RME, PE-1, M.Eng-SE│ NEW ERA UNIVERSITY P a g e |1
NEW ERA UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE
#9 Central Avenue, New Era, Quezon City
1. Considering only the column, and only as a short column, find the largest magnitude of 𝑷𝒖 that can be safely applied onto the frame,
as shown in the figure.
Compute for 𝑴𝒏
Compute for 𝒆
𝑴𝒏 𝑴𝒖 0.7𝑃 𝑚
𝒆= = = = 0.7 𝑚
𝑷𝒏 𝑷𝒖 𝑃
Compute for 𝜷𝟏
𝑓′ = 34.5 𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝟎. 𝟎𝟓
𝜷𝟏 = 𝟎. 𝟖𝟓 − (𝒇′𝒄 − 𝟐𝟖) > 𝟐𝟖 𝑴𝑷𝒂 𝒃𝒖𝒕 𝒏𝒐𝒕 𝒍𝒆𝒔𝒔 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒏 𝟎. 𝟔𝟓
𝟕
0.05
𝛽 = 0.85 − (34.5 − 28) = 0.8036
7
Compute for 𝒄
𝒂 𝑎
𝒄= =
𝜷𝟏 0.8036
𝟐
𝒅𝒊 − 𝒄
𝑷𝒏 = 𝟎. 𝟖𝟓 𝒇′𝒄 𝒃𝒂 − 𝑬𝒑𝒔 𝑨𝒑𝒔𝒊 𝜺𝒄𝒆 + 𝜺𝒑𝒆 + 𝜺𝒄𝒖
𝒄
𝒊 𝟏
𝑷𝒆
𝜺𝒄𝒆 = 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒; 𝑷𝒆 = (𝟏 − 𝜸)𝒙𝑵𝒔 𝒙𝑨𝒑𝒔 𝒙𝒇𝒑𝒔
𝑬𝒄 𝑨𝒄
𝒇𝒑𝒆
𝜺𝒑𝒆 = 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒; 𝒇𝒑𝒆 = (𝟏 − 𝜸)𝒙𝒇𝒑𝒔
𝑬𝒑𝒔
1,042.4 𝑁/𝑚𝑚
𝜀 = = 5.2123 𝑥10
199,945 𝑁/𝑚𝑚
𝑎
𝑑 −
𝑃 = 0.85 (34.5 𝑁/𝑚𝑚 )(400 𝑚𝑚)𝑎 − (199,945 𝑁/𝑚𝑚 ) (3𝑥98.7 𝑚𝑚 ) 1.3976 𝑥10 + 5.2123 𝑥10 + 0.003 0.8036
𝑎
0.8036
𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑒; 𝑑 = 350 𝑚𝑚
𝑎
350 𝑚𝑚 −
𝑃 = 0.85 (34.5 𝑁/𝑚𝑚 )(400 𝑚𝑚)𝑎 − (199,945 𝑁/𝑚𝑚 ) (3𝑥98.7 𝑚𝑚 ) 1.3976 𝑥10 + 5.2123 𝑥10 + 0.003 0.8036
𝑎
0.8036
𝟏. 𝟒𝟗𝟖𝟔𝟒𝟕𝟑𝟎𝟕 𝒙 𝟏𝟎𝟏𝟎
𝑴𝒏 = 𝟐, 𝟑𝟒𝟔, 𝟎𝟎𝟎𝒂 − 𝟓, 𝟖𝟔𝟓𝒂𝟐 + 𝟒𝟏, 𝟕𝟕𝟓, 𝟐𝟎𝟔. 𝟔𝟐 + (𝑬𝒒𝒖𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝟏. 𝟎𝒃)
𝒂
𝑴𝒏
𝒆=
𝑷𝒏
1.498647307 𝑥 10
2,346,000𝑎 − 5,865𝑎 + 41,775,206.62 +
700 𝑚𝑚 = 𝑎
99,909,820.44
11,730 𝑎 − 278,501.3775 −
𝑎
𝑎 = 132.309 𝑚𝑚
Prepared by: Engr. Andro S. Rebuyas, RCE, ME-1, SO2, RMP, RME, PE-1, M.Eng-SE│ NEW ERA UNIVERSITY P a g e |2
NEW ERA UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE
#9 Central Avenue, New Era, Quezon City
𝒇𝒑𝒚
𝜺𝒚 =
𝑬𝒑𝒔
𝑓 1586 𝑁/𝑚𝑚
𝜀 = = = 7.93 𝑥 10
𝐸 199,945 𝑁/𝑚𝑚
𝒅𝟏 (𝟏 − 𝜸) − 𝒂
𝜺𝒑𝒔𝟏 = 𝜺𝒄𝒆 + 𝜺𝒑𝒆 + 𝜺𝒄𝒖
𝒂
𝒅𝟐 (𝟏 − 𝜸) − 𝒂
𝜺𝒑𝒔𝟐 = 𝜺𝒄𝒆 + 𝜺𝒑𝒆 + 𝜺𝒄𝒖
𝒂
50 𝑚𝑚 (1 − 20%) − 132.309 𝑚𝑚
𝜀 = 1.3976 𝑥10 + 5.2123 𝑥10 + 0.003 = 3.259 𝑥 10 < 7.93 𝑥 10
132.309 𝑚𝑚
(𝑰𝒕 𝒊𝒔 𝒂𝒄𝒕𝒖𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒚 𝒃𝒆𝒕𝒘𝒆𝒆𝒏 𝟐𝟑𝟎 & 𝟐𝟕𝟎 𝒌𝒔𝒊): 𝑼𝒔𝒆: 𝒇𝒑𝒔(𝟏𝒐𝒓𝟐) = 𝟐𝟓𝟎 𝒌𝒔𝒊 = 𝟏, 𝟕𝟐𝟒 𝑴𝑷𝒂
𝒅𝟐 − 𝒄
𝑷𝒏 = 𝟎. 𝟖𝟓 𝒇′𝒄 𝒃𝒂 − 𝒇𝒑𝒔(𝟏𝒐𝒓𝟐) 𝑨𝒑𝒔 − 𝑬𝒑𝒔 𝑨𝒑𝒔 𝜺𝒄𝒆 + 𝜺𝒑𝒆 + 𝜺𝒄𝒖
𝒄
𝑎
50 𝑚𝑚 −
𝑃 = 0.85 (34.5 𝑁/𝑚𝑚 )(400 𝑚𝑚)𝑎 − (1,724 𝑁/𝑚𝑚 )(3𝑥98.7 𝑚𝑚 ) − (199,945 𝑁/𝑚𝑚 )(3𝑥98.7 𝑚𝑚 ) 1.3976 𝑥10 + 5.2123 𝑥10 + 0.003 0.8036
𝑎
0.8036
7,614,922.14
𝑃 = 11,730 𝑎 − 649,727.0887 − (𝐸𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 2𝑎)
𝑎
ℎ 𝑎 ℎ 𝑑 −𝑐 ℎ
𝑀 = 0.85 𝑓 𝑏𝑎 − +𝑓 ( )𝐴 𝑑 − +𝐸 𝐴 𝜀 +𝜀 +𝜀 𝑑 −
2 2 2 𝑐 2
𝑎
400 𝑚𝑚 𝑎 50 𝑚𝑚 − 0.80357 400 𝑚𝑚
𝑀 = 0.85 (34.5 𝑁/𝑚𝑚 )(400 𝑚𝑚)𝑎 − + (1,724 𝑁/𝑚𝑚 )(3𝑥98.7 𝑚𝑚 ) + (199,945 𝑁/𝑚𝑚 )(3𝑥98.7 𝑚𝑚 ) 1.3976 𝑥10 + 5.2123 𝑥10 + 0.003 𝑎 50 𝑚𝑚 −
2 2 2
0.80357
1,065,156,385
𝑀 = 2,346,000𝑎 − 5,865𝑎 + 20,377,126.91 − (𝐸𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 2𝑏)
𝑎
𝑴𝒏
𝒆=
𝑷𝒏
1,065,156,385
2,346,000𝑎 − 5,865𝑎 + 20,377,126.91 −
700 𝑚𝑚 = 𝑎
7,614,922.14
11,730 𝑎 − 649,727.0887 −
𝑎
𝑎 = 82.919 𝑚𝑚
Prepared by: Engr. Andro S. Rebuyas, RCE, ME-1, SO2, RMP, RME, PE-1, M.Eng-SE│ NEW ERA UNIVERSITY P a g e |3
NEW ERA UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE
#9 Central Avenue, New Era, Quezon City
7,614,922.14
𝑃 = 11,730𝑎 − 649,727.0887 −
𝑎
7,614,922.14
𝑃 = 11,730(82.919 𝑚𝑚) − 649,727.0887 − = 231,077.11 𝑁 𝑜𝑟 231.077 𝑘𝑁
82.919 𝑚𝑚
1,065,156,385
𝑀 = 2,346,000𝑎 − 5,865𝑎 + 20,377,126.91 −
𝑎
1,065,156,385
𝑀 = 2,346,000(82.919 𝑚𝑚) − 5,865(82.919 𝑚𝑚) + 20,377,126.91 − = 161,734,192.55 𝑁. 𝑚𝑚 𝑜𝑟 161.734 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚
82.919 𝑚𝑚
𝑪𝒐𝒎𝒑𝒖𝒕𝒆 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒄
𝑡𝑜 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑑 𝑐:
𝒂 = 𝜷𝟏 𝒄
𝑎 82.919 𝑚𝑚
𝑐= = = 103.1844 𝑚𝑚
𝛽 0.8036
𝑡𝑜 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑑 𝑐/𝑑 :
𝒄 103.1844 𝑚𝑚
= = 0.295 > 0.375
𝒅𝒕 350 𝑚𝑚
𝑪𝒐𝒎𝒑𝒖𝒕𝒆 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝜙
𝑡𝑜 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑑 𝜙:
𝑈𝑠𝑒𝑑 𝜙 = 0.90
Prepared by: Engr. Andro S. Rebuyas, RCE, ME-1, SO2, RMP, RME, PE-1, M.Eng-SE│ NEW ERA UNIVERSITY P a g e |4
NEW ERA UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE
#9 Central Avenue, New Era, Quezon City
2. Assume that 40% of the applied load is dead load. Place three (3) harped strands in the beam with zero eccentricity at the free end,
and at the zero-tension envelope at the column face. Then, based only on the ultimate flexural strength design, determine whether
the beam is adequate for carrying the applied loads of Part 1? Do not use any mild steel, and do not need to check stresses either
at the transfer or at the service conditions.
𝑨𝟏 𝒚𝟏 + 𝑨𝟐 𝒚𝟐
𝑪𝒃 = (𝑉𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑜𝑛 𝑠 𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑚)
𝑨𝟏 + 𝑨𝟐
𝑪𝒕 = 𝒉𝒘 𝒇 − 𝑪𝒃
𝐶 = 600 𝑚𝑚 − 350 𝑚𝑚
𝟑 𝟐 𝟐
(𝒃𝒘 )(𝒉𝒘 )𝟑 𝒃𝒇 𝒉𝒇 𝒉𝒘 𝒎𝒎 𝒉𝒇
𝑰𝒄 = + + 𝒃𝒘 (𝒉𝒘 ) 𝑪𝒕 − + 𝒃𝒇 𝒉𝒇 𝑪𝒕 − [𝒉𝒘 + ]
𝟏𝟐 𝟏𝟐 𝟐 𝟐
𝑰 4,933.33 𝑥 10 𝑚𝑚
𝒓𝟐 = =
𝑨 160,000 𝑚𝑚
𝑟 = 30,833.3125 𝑚𝑚
𝑰 4,933.33 𝑥 10 𝑚𝑚
𝑺𝒕 = = = 19.733 𝑥 10 𝑚𝑚 (𝑆𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑀𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑙𝑖/𝑀𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑙𝑢𝑠)
𝑪𝒕 250 𝑚𝑚
𝑰 4,933.33 𝑥 10 𝑚𝑚
𝑺𝒃 = = = 14.095 𝑥 10 𝑚𝑚 (𝑆𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑀𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑙𝑖/𝑀𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑙𝑢𝑠)
𝑪𝒃 350 𝑚𝑚
𝑺𝒕 19.733 𝑥 10 𝑚𝑚
𝑲𝒃 = = = 123.33 𝑚𝑚 (𝐿𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑘𝑒𝑟𝑛)
𝑨 160,000 𝑚𝑚
Compute for Mu
𝒉
𝑴𝒖 = 𝟎. 𝟏 𝑷𝒖 𝑳 − (𝑀𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑎𝑡 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛)
𝟐
0.40 𝑚
𝑀 = 0.1 (207.969 kN) 7.0 𝑚 − = 141.419 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚
2
𝟔𝟎
𝑴𝑳 = 𝑴 = 1.50𝑀
𝟒𝟎 𝑫
𝑀 = 39.283 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚
𝑴𝑻 = 𝑴𝑫 + 𝑴𝑳
Prepared by: Engr. Andro S. Rebuyas, RCE, ME-1, SO2, RMP, RME, PE-1, M.Eng-SE│ NEW ERA UNIVERSITY P a g e |5
NEW ERA UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE
#9 Central Avenue, New Era, Quezon City
𝑴𝑫
𝒂𝒎𝒊𝒏 = 𝑲𝒃 + 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒; 𝑷𝒊 = 𝑨𝒑𝒔 𝒙𝒇𝒑𝒔 = (3𝑥98.7 𝑚𝑚 )(1,303 𝑁/𝑚𝑚 ) = 385,818.3 𝑁
𝑷𝒊
39.283 𝑥 10 𝑁. 𝑚𝑚
𝑎 = 𝑒 = 123.33 𝑚𝑚 + = 225.147 𝑚𝑚 (𝑒𝑐𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑎𝑡 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛)
385,818.3 𝑁
𝒅𝒑 = 𝑪𝒕 + 𝒆
Prepared by: Engr. Andro S. Rebuyas, RCE, ME-1, SO2, RMP, RME, PE-1, M.Eng-SE│ NEW ERA UNIVERSITY P a g e |6
NEW ERA UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE
#9 Central Avenue, New Era, Quezon City
𝜸𝒑 𝒇𝒑𝒖 𝒅
𝒇𝒑𝒔 = 𝒇𝒑𝒖 𝟏 − 𝝆 + (𝝆 − 𝝆 )
𝜷𝟏 𝝆 𝒇′𝒄 𝒅𝒑
𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒; 𝜌 − 𝜌 = 0
𝒇𝒑𝒔 ≥ 𝟎. 𝟓𝟎 𝒇𝒑𝒖
𝑓′ = 34.5 𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝟎. 𝟎𝟓
𝜷𝟏 = 𝟎. 𝟖𝟓 − (𝟑𝟒. 𝟓 − 𝟐𝟖) > 𝟐𝟖 𝑴𝑷𝒂 𝒃𝒖𝒕 𝒏𝒐𝒕 𝒍𝒆𝒔𝒔 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒏 𝟎. 𝟔𝟓
𝟕
0.05
𝛽 = 0.85 − (34.5 − 28) = 0.8036
7
𝑨𝒑𝒔
𝝆𝒑 =
𝒃𝒇 𝒅𝒑
3𝑥98.7 𝑚𝑚
𝜌 = = 1.558 𝑥 10 (𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑒 𝑁. 𝐴. 𝑖𝑠 𝑖𝑛 𝑓𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒)
400 𝑚𝑚 (475.147 𝑚𝑚)
𝜸𝒑 𝒇𝒑𝒖
𝒇𝒑𝒔 = 𝒇𝒑𝒖 𝟏 − 𝝆
𝜷𝟏 𝝆 𝒇′𝒄
𝐶=𝑇
𝟎. 𝟖𝟓 𝒇 𝒄 𝒃𝒇 𝒙 𝒂 = 𝑨𝒑𝒔 𝒇𝒑𝒔
𝟏
𝝓𝑴𝒏 = 𝝓𝑨𝒑𝒔 𝒇𝒑𝒔 𝒅𝒑 − 𝒂
𝟐
1
𝜙𝑀 = 0.90𝑥3𝑥98.7 𝑚𝑚 𝑥1,782.233 𝑁/𝑚𝑚 𝑥 475.147 𝑚𝑚 − [44.99 𝑚𝑚] 𝑥 10
2
𝜙𝑀 = 214.986 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚
𝑀 = 141.419 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚
𝝓𝑴𝒏 ≥ 𝑴𝒖
Prepared by: Engr. Andro S. Rebuyas, RCE, ME-1, SO2, RMP, RME, PE-1, M.Eng-SE│ NEW ERA UNIVERSITY P a g e |7
NEW ERA UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE
#9 Central Avenue, New Era, Quezon City
3. Using the detailed shear design method, determine the amount (if any) of the shear reinforcement necessary for the beam at its
critical section. (Will be discuss on Final Term)
𝝀 𝒇𝒄 𝑴𝒄𝒓 𝒇𝒄
𝑽𝒄𝒊 = [ 𝒃 𝒅 + 𝑽𝒅 + 𝑽𝒊 ≥ 𝒃𝒘 𝒅𝒑
𝟐𝟎 𝒘 𝒑 𝑴𝒎𝒂𝒙 𝟕
𝜆 = 1.0, 𝑽𝒅 = 𝟎. 𝟏𝑷𝑫
𝑃 207.969 𝑘𝑁
𝑉 = 0.1 = 0.1 = 5.777 𝑘𝑁 𝑜𝑟 5,777 𝑁
3.6 3.6
𝑷𝒆 𝒆𝑪𝒃
𝒇𝒄𝒆 = − 𝟏+ 𝟐
𝑨 𝒓
𝑓 = −6.86 𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝑴𝑫
𝒇𝒅 =
𝑺𝒃
𝑀 39.283 𝑥 10 𝑁. 𝑚𝑚
𝑓 = = = 2.787 𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝑆 14.095 𝑥 10 𝑚𝑚
𝑑 = 𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 0.80 ℎ
𝑑 = 𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 0.80 (400 𝑚𝑚) = 320 𝑚𝑚 < 475.147 𝑚𝑚, 𝑢𝑠𝑒𝑑 475.147 𝑚𝑚
𝑀 = 14.095 𝑥 10 𝑚𝑚 (0.5(1.0) 34.5 𝑁/𝑚𝑚 + 6.86 𝑁/𝑚𝑚 − 2.787 𝑁/𝑚𝑚 ) 𝑥 10 = 98.804 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚
𝝀 𝒇𝒄 𝑴𝒄𝒓 𝒇𝒄
𝑽𝒄𝒊 = 𝒃𝒘 𝒅𝒑 + 𝑽𝒅 + 𝑽𝒊 ≥ 𝒃𝒘 𝒅𝒑
𝟐𝟎 𝑴𝒎𝒂𝒙 𝟕
𝑽𝒄𝒘 = 𝟎. 𝟑 𝝀 𝒇 𝒄 + 𝟎. 𝟑𝒇𝒄 𝒃𝒘 𝒅𝒑 + 𝑽𝒑
𝟏
𝒆
𝑽𝒑 = 𝑷𝒆 𝑺𝒊𝒏 𝜶 𝜶 = 𝒕𝒂𝒏
𝑨
𝑒 225.147 𝑚𝑚
𝛼 = 𝑡𝑎𝑛 = 𝑡𝑎𝑛 = 1.842°
𝐿 7000 𝑚𝑚
𝑉 = 0.3 1.0 34.5 𝑁/𝑚𝑚 + 0.3[−1.929 𝑁/𝑚𝑚 ] (200 𝑚𝑚)(475.147 𝑚𝑚) + 9,921.218 𝑁
𝑉 = 160,874.5664 𝑁
𝑽𝒄 = 𝒎𝒊𝒏(𝑽𝒄𝒊 𝒐𝒓 𝑽𝒄𝒘 )
𝑉 = 79,738.763 𝑁
𝟏
𝑽𝒖 = 𝟎. 𝟏𝑷𝒖 ≥ 𝝓𝑽𝒄
𝟐
1
𝑉 = 0.1𝑃 ≥ (0.75)(79,738.763 𝑁)
2
Prepared by: Engr. Andro S. Rebuyas, RCE, ME-1, SO2, RMP, RME, PE-1, M.Eng-SE│ NEW ERA UNIVERSITY P a g e |8
NEW ERA UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE
#9 Central Avenue, New Era, Quezon City
4. Check maximum crack width for the beam and determine if it is acceptable for humid areas. (Will be discuss on Final Term)
𝟓
𝑨𝒕
𝒘𝒎𝒂𝒙 = 𝜶𝒘 𝒙 𝟏𝟎 (𝜟𝒇𝒔 ), 𝒎𝒊𝒍𝒍𝒊𝒎𝒆𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒔
𝜮𝒐
𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒;
𝐴 = 𝑐𝑚
𝛴 = 𝑐𝑚
𝛥𝑓 = 𝑀𝑝𝑎
𝑨𝒕 = 𝟐𝒉′(𝒃𝒘 )
𝒉 = 𝒉𝒘 𝒇 − 𝒅𝒑
𝜮𝒐 = 𝑵𝒔 [𝝅𝑫𝒔 ]
𝐴
𝑤 = 𝛼 𝑥 10 (𝛥𝑓 ), 𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑠
𝛴
𝐴 500 𝑐𝑚
𝑤 = 8.48 𝑥 10 (𝛥𝑓 ) = 8.48 𝑥 10 (207 𝑀𝑃𝑎) = 0.733 𝑚𝑚
𝛴 11.969 𝑐𝑚
Prepared by: Engr. Andro S. Rebuyas, RCE, ME-1, SO2, RMP, RME, PE-1, M.Eng-SE│ NEW ERA UNIVERSITY P a g e |9
NEW ERA UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE
#9 Central Avenue, New Era, Quezon City
5. Using only the non-sway magnification factor for a single cantilever column, determine the maximum lever arm for the 𝟎. 𝟏𝑷𝒖 load, so
that the column not fail due to its slenderness.
𝐻 = 𝐿 = 3.0 𝑚
𝒓 = 𝟎. 𝟑𝟎 𝒉𝑿
𝑲𝑳𝒖 0.20(3.0 𝑚)
= = 5 < 40 (𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑛𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑤𝑎𝑦 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛𝑠)
𝒓 0.120 𝑚
𝐾𝐿 𝑀
≤ 34 + 12 = 34 + 12(−1.0) = 22 (𝑆𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛)
𝑟 𝑀
𝑪𝒎
𝜹𝒏𝒔 = ≥ 𝟏. 𝟎
𝑷𝒖
𝟏−
𝟎. 𝟕𝟓𝑷𝒄
𝑴𝟏
𝑪𝒎 = 𝟎. 𝟔𝟎 − 𝟎. 𝟒 ≥ 𝟎. 𝟒𝟎
𝑴𝟐
𝝅𝟐 𝑬𝑰
𝑷𝒄 =
(𝑲𝑳𝒖 )𝟐
𝟎.𝟒𝟎 𝑬𝒄 𝑰𝒈
𝑬𝑰 =
𝟏 𝜷𝒅
1.2 𝑃
𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒; 𝛽 =
1.2 𝑃 + 1.6 𝑃
𝟏. 𝟐 𝑷𝑫
𝜷𝒅 =
𝟏. 𝟐 𝑷𝑫 + 𝟏. 𝟔(𝟏. 𝟓 𝑷𝑫 )
𝑀 = 39.283 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚
𝑴𝑫 = 𝑷𝑫 𝑳
𝑃 = 5.612 𝑘𝑁
𝑀 = 58.9245 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚
𝑴𝑳 = 𝑷𝑳𝑳
𝑃 = 8.418 𝑘𝑁
(400 𝑚𝑚)
0.40 4,700 34.5 𝑁/𝑚𝑚
12
𝐸𝐼 = = 1.8846 𝑥 10 𝑁. 𝑚𝑚
1 + 0.250
𝝅𝟐 𝑬𝑰
𝑷𝒄 =
(𝑲𝑳𝒖 )𝟐
𝜋 (1.8846 𝑥 10 𝑁. 𝑚𝑚 )
𝑃 = = 516,673,790.4 𝑁 𝑜𝑟 516,673.7904 𝑘𝑁
(0.2𝑥3000 𝑚𝑚)
𝑪𝒎
𝜹𝒏𝒔 = ≥ 𝟏. 𝟎
𝑷𝒖
𝟏−
𝟎. 𝟕𝟓𝑷𝒄
1.0
𝛿 = ≥ 1.0
207.969 𝑘𝑁
1−
0.75(516,673.7904 𝑘𝑁)
𝐿 7.0 𝑚
𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝑙𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑟𝑚 = = = 𝟔. 𝟗𝟗𝟔 𝒎
𝛿 1.00436975
Prepared by: Engr. Andro S. Rebuyas, RCE, ME-1, SO2, RMP, RME, PE-1, M.Eng-SE│ NEW ERA UNIVERSITY P a g e | 10